The field of this disclosure relates generally to fiber lasers and fiber-coupled laser systems to deliver optical beams for use in additive manufacturing and, in particular, to improved annular laser beam profiles for powder bed fusion applications.
There are several types of additive manufacturing capable of processing metal workpieces. Two such categories of additive manufacturing include powder bed fusion and direct energy deposition (DED).
Powder bed fusion is a type of additive manufacturing that entails fusing powder using heat energy provided by an optical or electron beam. Currently, there are two primary types of powder bed fusion that employ optical beams.
A first type of powder bed fusion is called selective laser sintering (SLS). In SLS, a laser beam sinters powdered materials such as plastics, nylons, and ceramics. Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) is a similar technology in which the powder is metal.
A second type of powder bed fusion is called selective laser melting (SLM). In SLM processes, a laser creates a melt pool in the powder bed. The melt pool quickly cools and solidifies to form parts.
DED includes laser engineering net shape (LENS) and electron beam additive manufacturing (EBAM). Instead of sintering or melting powder layers, feedstock is concurrently deposited and cured with heat energy.
Some attempts have been made to characterize the use of annular intensity distributions in additive manufacturing. For example, in a 2015 paper titled, “Simulation of the effect of different laser beam intensity profiles on heat distribution in selective laser melting,” Wischeropp et al. describe a 2D-FEM model for qualitatively simulating the heat distribution for the melting of TiAl6V4 powder on top of a solid TiAl6V4 block. The heat distribution during the melting of a single track was simulated for three different laser beam intensity profiles at different scanning speeds and laser powers. The results touted in the paper note an increased energy efficiency and a reduced amount of vaporized material when employing the donut-shaped laser beam intensity profiles in contrast to Gaussian-shaped ones. The authors suggest donut-shaped laser beam intensity profiles provide higher build-up rates for powder bed fusion applications.
Donut-shaped laser beam intensity profiles, more generally referred to as annular intensity distributions (which include saddle shapes), have previously been attempted through excitation of a population of many modes. In other words, a multi-mode input is used to essentially flood a fiber optic segment having an annular core so as to excite many modes delivered at an output of the segment.
This disclosure describes low-moded source excitation of few modes in multi-mode annular confinement core (i.e., a core having a cross-sectional profile in the shape of a ring). It is the inventors' present belief that, in contrast to a high population of modes delivered at an output, the few modes provide a higher beam quality in terms of BPP and Rayleigh range, which dramatically improve performance in terms of increased processing speed, reduced vaporized material (lower smoke and soot production), and reduced sizes of features that can be manufactured.
In some embodiments, few modes produce non-uniformity of an intensity distribution delivered at an output. Thus, this disclosure also describes embodiments including externally applied perturbation to establish a functionally homogenized annular intensity distribution with a relatively high Rayleigh range for additive manufacturing. The disclosed embodiments rely on different optical properties and mechanisms by which to homogenize the annular intensity distribution. Accordingly, the embodiments (and underlying mechanisms) are generally referred to as a phase displacement embodiment and a variable modal excitation embodiment.
More specifically, in a first embodiment, rapid vibration is applied toward a free end of an optical fiber so as to introduce mechanical oscillations (e.g., about 70 Hz) that rapidly change an interference pattern of the few modes. The change in the interference pattern rapidly moves any high intensity areas within the annular intensity distribution so as to functionally homogenize it from the perspective of the powder material. In other words, any so-called hot spots are rapidly distributed to avoid excess smoke and soot while still delivering a relatively low BPP and high Rayleigh range.
In a second embodiment, external perturbation is applied to modulate launch conditions through which few modes are excited. Accordingly, a source beam rapidly changes the population of modes that are excited. When the launch conditions are varied sufficiently rapidly, the rapid modulation has the effect (from the perspective of the powdered material) of homogenizing the annular intensity distribution delivered at the output.
Additional aspects and advantages will be apparent from the following detailed description of embodiments, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Not fully populating modes that would otherwise be supported in a multi-mode waveguide, however, tends to cause a lumpy, non-uniform intensity distribution at the output (also called a lobed structure). Uneven energy distribution 110 is characterized by relatively low- and high-intensity areas or so-called hot spots. Because there are few modes excited in the disclosed systems, their distribution under state(s) of static perturbation and mode excitation conditions appears to be somewhat lumpy at the output. This lumpiness may be tolerated (i.e., statically delivered) in some applications having materials and scan speeds that are not sensitive to hot-spots. This inhomogeneity can have a time dependence, which would also make the beam unstable.
For some other applications, however, uneven energy distribution 110 is functionally homogenized through externally applied perturbation that dynamically provides one or both of modulation of phase displacement and rapid variation of launch conditions for varying the population of few excited modes. Even though the resultant beam may still be instantaneously inhomogeneous at any particular time, the perturbation is sufficiently fast to allow the beam to behave in its interactions with workpieces (e.g., powder beds and the like) as if it is homogenous and stable. Thus, this disclosure describes techniques for homogenizing an inhomogeneous, non-uniform, or asymmetric intensity distribution so that it retains a relatively high quality (e.g., in terms of depth of filed and Rayleigh range) for use in industrial laser processing applications.
There are several fiber optic devices capable of generating annular intensity distribution 100. Three such embodiments are described as follows, although skilled persons will appreciate in light of this disclosure that other embodiments are also possible. Although the examples that follow are described in the context of annular intensity distributions, the disclosed techniques have widespread applicability for different types of multi-mode waveguide structures (e.g., rectangular, hexagonal, and others) having modes that are not fully populated and therefore associated with inhomogeneous, non-uniform, or asymmetric beams of various shapes (e.g., a top hat beam having hot spots).
To further enhance the resultant beam for use in additive manufacturing, the present inventors tested an SM input 280 exciting few modes 286 in second length of fiber 280, which would typically support many modes. In other words, low-moded input 280 delivered by first length of fiber 204 at junction 206 excites relatively small population of modes 286 in second length of fiber 208 acting as a waveguide for guiding modes 286. In a representative experiment, a single-mode beam was launched into an annular guiding region with an inner diameter of approximately 40 μm and an outer diameter of approximately 60 μm. Populating all the modes of the annular region would result in an M2 value of about 30, whereas the measured M2 was about 8 for the actual annular beam (due to its low-moded excitation). This 3.8×improvement in beam quality results in a 3.8×increase in the depth of field (Rayleigh range) for the focused beam, providing substantial processing advantages (larger process window, lower sensitivity to optical alignment).
An exact number of modes in a small population can vary based on empirical results. It is the inventors' present belief that excitation of about half (i.e., 50%) or less of the supportable modes provides desired benefits in connection with powder bed fusion. In other embodiments, the number of modes excited may comprise a range from two to ten modes, which may be about 10% or less of the possible modes that are actually guidable by the waveguide. Other percentages and ranges of excited (vis-à-vis supported) modes are also considered to fall within the scope of this disclosure. Likewise, the low number of modes of the source can be expressed in terms of the proportion of the few modes excited at the output. For instance, an SM source is suitable for exciting ten or fewer modes, and, more generally, a low-moded source (e.g., four modes) is suitable for exciting 10% or less of the supported modes. The actual percentage may vary depending on the number of modes supported in the multimode fiber spans a broad range for different fiber designs. Some designs support 10-20 modes in which case the low-moded input may excite about 80% of those modes, whereas others support more than 1000 modes and the low-moded input excites a much smaller percentage.
In a first embodiment, lab experiments performed by the present inventors have demonstrated that the distribution of power shown in
In terms of the underlying mechanism that produces the functional result, it is noted that externally applied perturbation at the output changes the phase relationship among the few modes, and it need not change a number of modes that are excited. Thus, a change in phase results in rapidly changing minima and maxima and positive and negative interference among the modes in the second length of fiber, which in turn rapidly changes the azimuthal location of the hot spots. The average intensity, therefore, appears to be homogenized when the change in phase is sufficiently rapid.
Various other types of perturbation devices are also possible. For example, many other devices could be used internal or external to the laser box: piezo, voice coil, solenoid actuators, alternating electromagnetic fields, a fan/air to vibrate the fiber, or other devices and sources of vibration. FIG. 24 of the '854 patent shows examples of different types perturbation devices for varying the population of excited modes, and these types of devices are also suitable for use in changing the phase relationship inside fiber 610. Other mechanical actuators include linear or rotary motor that drives the vibration directly or via a linkage that changes the frequency (e.g., an eccentric rotating mass), pneumatic actuators, and electro- or magneto-strictive devices. Perturbation may also be imparted by pushing or compressing the ring fiber, introducing small micro bends to the ring fiber, and including some geometry to the fiber cladding.
In a second embodiment, the present inventors recognized that rapid variations in launch conditions could also be used to generate functionally homogenized results. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 10,677,984 of Brown et al. describes techniques for generating temporally apparent intensity distributions by rapid, externally applied perturbation at a VBC fiber to excite modes in different cores. This technique could also be applied to dither between different small populations of few modes that are excited in the same core, thereby rapidly changing the hot spots for delivering a high-quality beam enhancing powder bed fusion. The dithering can vary launch conditions between two coaxial cores or within a single ring core (e.g., by moving a portion of the beam between cladding and the waveguide portion or by imparting rapid transverse displacement of a beam launched in the single ring core). In some embodiments, a static perturbation is applied to impart transverse displacement and a high-frequency dynamic supplemental perturbation is applied to rapidly vary launch conditions in a single ring core.
Finally, skilled persons will appreciate that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. For example, features of the first and second embodiments for introducing externally applied perturbation are combinable into a third embodiment having both phase relationship and modal excitation homogenization. Furthermore, skilled persons will appreciate that modulation frequency and speed of variation in launch conditions are functions of the desired average intensity distribution, type of laser process, and workpiece thermal material properties such as thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, specific heat, melting point, or other properties. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/865,902 filed Jun. 24, 2019; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/882,442 filed Aug. 2, 2019. Both related applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/039463 | 6/24/2020 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62882442 | Aug 2019 | US | |
62865902 | Jun 2019 | US |