The subject invention relates to a fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material, facings made with the fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material for faced building insulation assemblies, such as but not limited to faced building insulation assemblies commonly used to insulate homes and other residential building structures; offices, stores and other commercial building structures; and industrial building structures, and to the faced building insulation assemblies faced with such facings. The kraft paper sheet material facings of the subject invention are designed to exhibit improved fungi growth-inhibiting characteristics and may also exhibit other improved performance characteristics such as but not limited to improved functionality to improve installer productivity.
Building insulation assemblies currently used to insulate buildings, especially fiberglass building insulations, are commonly faced with kraft paper facings, such as 30-40 lbs/3MSF (30 to 40 pounds/ 3000 square feet) natural kraft paper. In addition, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,733,624; 5,746,854; 6,191,057; and 6,357,504 disclose examples of polymeric facings for use in faced building insulation assemblies and US patent application nos. US 2002/0179265 A1; US 2002/0182964 A1; and US 2002/0182965 A1 disclose examples of polymeric-kraft laminates for use in faced building insulation assemblies.
While building insulation assemblies faced with such kraft paper facings function quite well, have been used for decades, and the patents listed above disclose kraft paper facing materials as well as alternative facing materials, there has remained a need for facings with improved performance characteristics. The improved kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention, the improved kraft paper sheet material facings of the subject invention, and the building insulation assemblies faced with the improved kraft paper sheet material facings of the subject invention provide faced insulation assemblies designed to exhibit improved fungi growth-inhibiting characteristics over current kraft paper facings commonly used to face insulation assemblies.
The fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention can be used for many applications where unwanted fungi growth is typically encountered. However, the fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention is particularly useful as a sheet material for the facings of the faced building insulation assemblies of the subject invention. The fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention and the facings of the subject invention, made with the fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention include a kraft paper sheet and an asphalt coating applied to one of the major surfaces of a kraft paper sheet that contains one or more fungi growth-inhibiting agents. The asphalt coating layer not only makes the kraft paper sheet more fungi resistant, but functions as vapor retarder to retard the transmission of water vapor through the fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material and as a bonding layer to bond the facings of the subject invention to insulation layers. The fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention; the facings of the subject invention made with the fungi resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention; the facings of the subject invention as applied to the insulation layer to form faced building insulation assemblies of the subject invention; and the covering sheets of the subject invention applied over nonfaced insulation are preferably fungi growth resistant as defined herein and more preferably fungi growth resistant with no observable fungi growth as defined herein.
When a surface of a specimen of a kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention or a facing of the subject invention, as bonded to an insulation layer of a faced insulation assembly of the subject invention, and a surface of a comparative specimen of a white birch or southern yellow pine wood, which are each approximately 0.75 by 6 inches (20 by 150 mm), are tested as follows, the specimen of kraft paper sheet material or facing of the subject invention will have less spore growth than the comparative specimen of white birch or southern yellow pine. Spore suspensions of aspergillus niger, aspergillus versicolor, penicillium funiculosum, chaetomium globosum, and asperguillus flavus are prepared that each contain 1,000,000 ±200,000 spores per mL as determined with a counting chamber. Equal volumes of each of the spore suspensions are blended together to produce a mixed spore suspension. The 0.75 by 6 inch surface of the specimen of the kraft paper sheet material or facing of the subject invention and the 0.75 by 6 inch surface of the comparative specimen of white birch or southern yellow pine wood are each inoculated with approximately 0.50 mL of the mixed spore suspension by spaying the surfaces with a fine mist from a chromatography atomizer capable of providing 100,000 ±20,000 spores/ inch2. The specimens are immediately placed in an environmental chamber and maintained at a temperature of 86 ±4° F. (30 ±2° C.) and 95 ±4% relative humidity for a minimum period of 28 days ±8 hours from the time incubation commenced (the incubation period). At the end of the incubation period, the specimens are examined at 40× magnification. The specimen of the kraft paper sheet material or facing of the subject invention made of the kraft paper sheet material passes the test provided the specimen of the kraft paper sheet material or facing has less spore growth than the comparative specimen of white birch or southern yellow pine wood. As used in this specification and claims the term “fungi growth resistant” means the observable spore growth at 40× magnification on the surface of a kraft paper sheet material or facing specimen being tested is less than the observable spore growth at 40× magnification on either a white birch or southern yellow pine comparative specimen when the specimens are tested as set forth herein in accordance with ASTM Standard Test Method for Determining Fungi Resistance of Insulation Materials and Facings C 1338- 00. As used in this specification and claims the term “fungi growth resistant with no observable fungi growth” means there is no observable spore growth at 40× magnification on the surface of a kraft paper sheet material or facing specimen being tested when the specimens are tested as set forth herein in accordance with ASTM Standard Test Method for Determining Fungi Resistance of Insulation Materials and Facings C 1338- 00.
As used in this specification and claims the term “kraft paper sheet” means a paper sheet derived from cellulose fibers and includes paper sheets such as but not limited to dyed kraft paper, bleached kraft paper, and natural kraft paper. As used herein the term “asphalt” includes both asphalt and modified asphalt, such as but not limited to one of the modified asphalts commonly used in the industry to bond facings to insulation layers. The asphalt coating layer may be applied to the major surface of the kraft paper sheet by various methods, such as but not limited to, applying the asphalt to one major surface of the kraft paper sheet with a slot die extrusion coater; applying the asphalt to one major surface of the kraft paper sheet with a transfer roll; and applying the asphalt to one major surface of the kraft paper sheet by conventional spray on techniques. The asphalt coating layer may be pre-applied to the facing or applied to the facing and/or a major surface of the insulation layer at the point where the facing and the insulation layer are being combined. For example, the asphalt coating layer may be applied to the kraft paper sheet immediately prior to applying the kraft paper sheet material thus formed to a major surface of an insulation layer while the asphalt is still hot or the asphalt coating layer may be preapplied to the kraft paper sheet and the kraft paper sheet material thus formed reheated for application to a major surface of an insulation layer. The asphalt layer of the kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention has a softening point temperature sufficiently low to enable the asphalt layer to be heated to a temperature to effect a bond between the facing and a major surface of the insulation layer without degrading the facing. The asphalt layer of the facing of the subject invention will typically increase the water repellency of the kraft paper sheet and thereby make the facing less susceptible to fungi growth by reducing the presence of moisture in the insulation assembly. In addition, the kraft paper sheet, with the asphalt layer, exhibits a reduced water vapor permeance rating and functions as a water vapor and/or air transmission retarder to reduce the passage of water vapor and/or air through kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention and facings of the subject invention.
The facing of the subject invention may have lateral tabs, may be tabless, or may have lateral tabs made from a sheet material that differs from the sheet material of the field portion of the facing and that are sufficiently transparent to enable framing members to be seen through the tabs, sufficiently open to enable wallboard to be directly bonded to framing members overlaid by the tabs, and/or sufficiently greater in integrity than the field portion of the facing to permit a less expensive material to be used for the field portion of the facing. The field portion of the facing of the subject invention may include a mineral coating (e.g. clay coating) layer with or without modifiers or a polymeric coating or film layer with or without modifiers that is applied to the kraft paper sheet material.
The facing of the subject invention may be formed from a gusseted tubular sheet material. The facing of the subject invention may be separable longitudinally at spaced apart locations in the central field portion of the facing so that the facing can be applied to a pre-cut longitudinally separable insulation layer and separated where the pre-cut longitudinally separable insulation layer is separable. The building insulation assembly of the subject invention may have a laterally compressible resilient insulation layer faced with a tabless facing having portions, e.g. lateral edge portions, which may be separated from the insulation layer when the insulation layer is laterally compressed to form lateral tabs in place that extend laterally beyond the compressed insulation layer. The fungi growth resistant kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention, typically in widths of about four feet or more, may be applied as a vapor passage retarding covering directly to the framing members of a wall where unfaced insulation is used to insulate the wall cavities.
FIGS. 9 to 12 are partial schematic views of embodiments of the faced insulation assembly of the subject invention showing other tabs that may be substituted for the tabs shown on the facing of FIGS. 1 to 3. The partial schematic views of FIGS. 9 to 12 correspond to the view of
The kraft paper sheet material 10 of the subject invention shown in
The kraft paper sheet material 10: has more fungi growth resistance than the kraft paper sheet 12 has by itself; preferably, is fungi growth resistant (as defined herein); and more preferably, is fungi growth resistant with no observable fungi growth (as defined herein). Typically, the kraft paper sheet 12 by itself is not fungi growth resistant (as defined herein).
The kraft paper sheet 12 has a preferred Gurley Hill porosity of at least 20. The preferred porosity of the a kraft paper sheet 12 facilitates the partial absorption by the kraft paper sheet 12 of the asphalt coating layer 14 applied to the first major surface of the sheet the kraft paper sheet with little or no bleed through of the asphalt to the second major surface of the kraft paper sheet so that the kraft paper sheet material 10 is fungi resistant with an essentially asphalt free second major surface. By itself, the kraft paper sheet 12 is too permeable to function as a vapor retarder for many facing applications. However, by combining the kraft paper sheet 12 with the asphalt coating layer 14, the permeance of the kraft paper sheet material 10 may be set so that kraft paper sheet material 10 functions as a vapor retarder to retard the transmission of water vapor through the kraft paper sheet material to a desired degree. For example, the kraft paper sheet material 10 may be coated with the asphalt coating layer so that the kraft paper sheet material (as measured in accordance with ASTM Test Designation: E 96-00 entitled “Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials”) exhibits a water vapor permeance rating no greater than 1 and, more preferably, approximately 1 grain/ft2/hour/inch Hg (no greater than 1 perm and more preferably, approximately 1 perm); a water vapor permeance rating between 1 and 10 grain/ft2/hour/inch Hg (between 1 perm and 10 perms); or a water vapor permeance rating greater than 10 grain/ft2/hour/inch Hg (greater than 10 perms) to provide a vapor retarder or barrier for a faced fibrous insulation blanket, e.g. a faced resilient fiberglass insulation blanket, and other insulation assemblies or systems.
It should be noted that the fungi growth-inhibiting agent used in asphalt coating layer 14 may comprise one fungi growth-inhibiting agent or a combination or blend of two or more fungi growth-inhibiting agents to provide a broader or more efficacious fungi growth resistance for the kraft paper sheet material 10 and that the fungi growth-inhibiting agent should be able to withstand temperatures in excess of 150° C. (300°F.) for long periods of time, e.g. periods of up to about 12 hours, and, preferably, temperatures in excess of 175° C. (350° F.) for periods up to 60 minutes without significant degradation. The following are examples of fungi growth inhibiting agents that withstand the above temperatures for the specified times without significant degradation: 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (a chemical also known as “TBZ”) sold by Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designation Iraguard F 3000; silver zeolyte sold by Rohm & Haas Company under the trade designation KATHON; and Zinc Pyrithione sold by Arch Chemicals Inc. under the trade designation Zinc Omadine.
In a preferred kraft paper sheet material 10 of the subject invention, the kraft paper sheet material 10 contains between 200 and 2000 ppm (parts per million), more preferably between 300 and 700 ppm, and most preferably between 400 and 600 ppm of the fungi growth-inhibiting agent 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (a chemical also known as “TBZ”). In another preferred kraft paper sheet material 10 of the subject invention, the asphalt coating layer 14 contains at least 1.5 grams of 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) per each 100 square meters of coating. As mentioned above, the asphalt coating layer 14 is preferably applied to the kraft paper sheet in amounts ranging from about 0.03 to about 0.05 kilograms per square meter (about 6 to about 10 pounds per 1000 square feet). The inclusion of 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) in the asphalt coating layer 14 rather than incorporating the 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) in the kraft paper sheet during the manufacture of the kraft paper sheet has proved to be very beneficial. When tested in accordance with ASTM Standard Test Method for Determining Fungi Resistance of Insulation Materials and Facings Designation: C 1338-00, a kraft paper sheet material 10 using a particular kraft paper sheet with an asphalt coating layer containing about 2 grams of 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) per 1000 square feet of coating (about 2 grams of 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) per each 92.9 square meters of coating) had a fungi growth resistance substantially equal to the fungi growth resistance of an otherwise identical kraft paper sheet containing about 5 grams of 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) per each 1000 square feet of kraft paper sheet (about 5 grams of 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) per each 92.9 square meters of the kraft paper sheet). Thus, for similar efficacy against fungi growth, the inclusion of the 2-(4-Thiazolyl) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”) in the asphalt of the asphalt coating layer 14 resulted in about a 60% reduction in the usage of 2(4-Thiazoly) Benzimidazole (“TBZ”).
Samples of the standard asphalt used by Johns Manville International to form the asphalt coating layers on facings of kraft faced building insulation were modified by adding quantities of TBZ and/or Zinc Pyrithione to the asphalt-in parts per million (ppm). Five specimens of the asphalt with and without the TBZ and/or Zinc Pyrithione additives were then one-side coated on glass fiber filter paper (this type of filter paper does not support mold growth and is used as a noncontributing carrier for the asphalt). A sample of the number four specimen of asphalt was also one-side coated on regular 35 pound per 3000 square feet natural kraft paper to form specimen number 6. The variations shown in the table below were tested in triplicate for mold growth resistance in accordance with ASTM Test Designation G 21-96 (Reapproved 2002) entitled “Standard Practice for Determining Resistance of Synthetic Polymeric Materials to Fungi”.
ASTM Test Designation G-21 has the following ratings for observed fungi growth on specimens (Sporulating or Non-Sporulating, or Both):
The results indicate the following:
1. The asphalt with no fungi growth-inhibiting additives supports fungi growth and is not very fungi resistant.
2. TBZ added to the asphalt makes the asphalt dramatically more fungi resistant.
3. Zinc Pyrithione added to the asphalt at the 600 ppm level does not provide a measurable fungi resistance benefit.
4. TBZ used in combination with Zinc Pyrithione makes the asphalt dramatically more fungi resistant even at relatively low addition levels. The results suggest a synergistic benefit from the blend of these two fungi growth inhibiting agents.
5. Theory suggests that a secondary heating of specimen 6, by passing the specimen over a hot roll as when a facing is reheated prior to its application to an insulation layer, would enhance the fungi resistance of the uncoated side of specimen and provide better results than those recorded above for specimen 6.
The asphalt of the asphalt coating layer may contain an odor-reducing additive in an amount sufficient to significantly reduce and substantially neutralize the asphalt odor that would otherwise be emitted by the asphalt coating layer without adversely affecting the adherent qualities of the asphalt coating layer. For example the asphalt of the asphalt coating layer may include an odor-reducing additive of essential plant oil in an amount approximating 1 part by weight odor-reducing additive to 10,000 parts by weight asphalt.
Where the kraft paper sheet of the kraft paper sheet material includes a mineral coating (e.g. a clay coated 30-40 lbs/3MSF kraft paper laminate or a clay coated 20-30 lbs/3MSF kraft paper laminate), polymeric coating (e.g. a 20-30 lb/3MSF natural kraft that is coated with an outer white-pigmented HDPE film layer such as an HDPE film layer applied at a weight of about 7-15 lbs/3MSF), or ink coating layer, a fungi growth-inhibiting agent or fungi growth-inhibiting agent and pesticide also may be included in any one or more of the coating layers. At a relatively low cost, the mineral coating layer increases the stiffness and body of the kraft paper sheet material, the integrity of the kraft paper sheet material, the “cuttability” of the kraft paper sheet material, the “cuffability” (ability of the kraft paper sheet material to hold a fold when forming tabs), and the fire resistance of the kraft paper sheet material.
Preferably, each kraft paper sheet material and facing of the subject invention, as bonded to the insulation layer, passes the ASTM Test Designation C 1338-00, entitled “Standard Test Method for Determining Fungi Resistance of Insulation Materials and Facings”, published August 2000, by ASTM International of West Conshohocken, Pa. (referred to in this specification and claims as “ASTM Test Designation C 1338-00”). More preferably, each kraft paper sheet material and facing of the subject invention is fungus resistant (as defined in section 11.2 of the test) as tested by ASTM Test Designation D 2020 - 92 (Reapproved 1999), entitled “Standard Test Methods for Mildew (Fungus) Resistance of Paper and Paperboard”, published August 1992 (referred to in this specification and claims as “ASTM Test Designation D 2020-92”). Most preferably, each kraft paper sheet material and facing of the subject invention has a rating of 0 (as defined in section 9.3 of the test) as tested by ASTM Test Designation G 21-96 (Reapproved 2002), entitled “Standard Practice for Determining Resistance of Synthetic Polymeric Materials to Fungi”, published September 1996 (referred to in this specification and claims as “ASTM Test Designation G 21-96”). The text of ASTM Test Designations C 1338-00, D 2020-92, and G 21-96 referred to in this paragraph are hereby incorporated into this specification in their entirety by reference.
As discussed above, asphalt coating layer 14 may be applied to the kraft paper sheet 12 to form the kraft paper sheet material 10 by different methods. For example, the asphalt coating layer 14 may be applied to the first major surface of the kraft paper sheet 12 with a slot die extrusion coater; with a transfer roll; or with the use of conventional spray on techniques. The asphalt coating layer 14 is applied to the kraft paper sheet 10 with the asphalt heated to temperatures in excess of 120° C. (250° F.) and typically, with the asphalt heated to temperatures. in excess of 150° C. (300° F.). At these temperatures, the asphalt of the asphalt coating layer 14 is absorbed into the kraft paper sheet 12 by a wicking or capillary action without degrading the kraft paper sheet and the fungi growth-inhibiting agent in the asphalt increases the fungi growth resistance of the kraft paper sheet throughout the kraft paper sheet including the uncoated second major surface of the kraft paper sheet. Preferably, the asphalt coated kraft paper sheet forms a kraft paper sheet material 10 that is fungi growth resistant (as defined herein) and more preferably fungi growth resistant with no observable fungi (as defined herein).
When the kraft paper sheet material 10 is used as a facing, the asphalt coating layer 14 may be pre-applied to the kraft paper sheet 12 to form a facing for later application to an insulation layer or the asphalt coating layer 14 may be applied to the kraft paper sheet 12 in an on line process where the facing and the insulation layer are being combined. When the asphalt coating layer 14 is preapplied to the kraft paper sheet 10 to form a facing for later application to an insulation layer, the asphalt layer of the facing is reheated immediately prior to the application of the facing to a major surface of an insulation layer; the facing is applied to the insulation layer while the asphalt is still hot and tacky; and the asphalt is allowed to cool to bond the facing to the insulation layer. The secondary heating of the preapplied asphalt in this process may cause the asphalt to further penetrate the kraft paper sheet to make the kraft paper sheet material 10 more fungi resistant. When the asphalt coating layer 14 is applied to the kraft paper sheet 12 to form the facing immediately prior to applying the facing thus formed to an insulation layer, the facing is applied to a major surface of the insulation layer while the asphalt is still hot and tacky and the asphalt is allowed to cool to bond the facing to the major surface of an insulation layer.
While the insulation layers faced with the facings of the subject invention may be made of other materials, such as but not limited to foam insulation materials, preferably, the insulation layers of the insulation assemblies of the subject invention are resilient fibrous insulation blankets and, preferably, the faced conventional uncut resilient fibrous insulation blankets and the faced pre-cut resilient fibrous insulation blankets of the subject invention are made of randomly oriented, entangled, glass fibers and typically have a density between about 0.3 pounds/ft 3 and about 1.6 pounds/ft3. Examples of fibers that may be used other than or in addition to glass fibers to form the faced resilient insulation blankets of the subject invention are mineral fibers, such as but not limited to, rock wool fibers, slag fibers, and basalt fibers; organic fibers such as but not limited to polypropylene, polyester and other polymeric fibers; natural fibers such as but not limited to cellulose, wood, flax and cotton fibers; and combinations of such fibers. The fibers in the faced resilient insulation blankets of the subject invention may be bonded together at their points of intersection for increased integrity, e.g. by a binder such as but not limited to a polycarboxy polymers, polyacrylic acid polymers, a urea phenol formaldehyde or other suitable bonding material, or the faced resilient fibrous insulation blankets of the subject invention may be binder-less provided the blankets possess the required integrity and resilience.
While the faced resilient fibrous insulation blankets of the subject invention may be in roll form (typically in excess of 117 inches in length), for most applications, such as the insulation of walls in homes and other residential structures, the faced resilient fibrous insulation blankets of the subject invention are in the form of batts about 46 to about 59 inches in length (typically about 48 inches in length) or 88 to about 117 inches in length (typically about 93 inches in length). Typically, the widths of the faced resilient fibrous insulation blankets are substantially equal to or somewhat greater than standard cavity width of the cavities to be insulated, for example: about 15 to about 15½ inches in width (a nominal width of 15 inches) for a cavity where the center to center spacing of the wall, floor, ceiling or roof framing members is about 16 inches (the cavity having a width of about 14 ½ inches); and about 23 to about 23½ inches in width (a nominal width of 23 inches) for a cavity where the center to center spacing of the wall, floor, ceiling or roof framing members is about 24 inches (the cavity having a width of about 22½ inches). However, for other applications, the faced resilient fibrous insulation blankets may have different initial widths determined by the standard widths of the cavities to be insulated by the insulation blankets.
The amount of thermal resistance or sound control desired and the depth of the cavities being insulated by the faced insulation assemblies determine the thicknesses of the faced insulation assemblies of the subject invention, e.g. faced resilient fibrous insulation blankets. Typically, the faced insulation assemblies are about three to about ten or more inches in thickness and approximate the depth of the cavities being insulated. For example, in a wall cavity defined in part by nominally 2×4 or 2×6 inch studs or framing members, a faced pre-cut resilient fibrous insulation blanket will have a thickness of about 3½ inches or about 5 ½ inches, respectively.
The facing 22 of the faced insulation assembly 20 and the other facings and water vapor transmission retarding coverings of the other insulation assemblies and systems of the subject invention may be formed from a collapsed tubular kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention that includes first and second lateral gusset portions.
FIGS. 9 to 20 show additional embodiments of the faced insulation assembly of the subject invention. The faced insulation assemblies of FIGS. 9 to 20 include facings of the subject invention made from the kraft paper sheet material of the subject invention and an insulation layer. The elements of the faced insulation assemblies of FIGS. 9 to 20 that correspond to those of FIGS. 1 to 3 will have corresponding reference numerals in the hundreds with the same last two digits as the reference numerals-used for those elements in FIGS. 1 to 3. Unless otherwise stated, the elements of FIGS. 9 to 20 identified with reference numerals having the same last two digits as the reference numerals referring to those elements in FIGS. 1 to 3 are and function the same as those of
When the insulation layer 824 of faced insulation assembly 820 is compressed in the direction of its width to fit between a pair of framing members that are spaced a distance less than the width of insulation layer 824, the lateral edge portions 896 of the facing sheet can be separated from the major surface 826 of the insulation layer and extended as tabs beyond the lateral surfaces of the laterally compressed insulation layer 824 to provide a water vapor transmission retarding barrier between the facing and the framing members and/or for attachment to the framing members. When an insulation section 890 of faced insulation assembly 820 is compressed in the direction of its width to fit between a pair of framing members that are spaced a distance less than the width of insulation section 890, the portions of the facing sheet adjacent the lateral surfaces of the compressed insulation section 890 (portions 896 and/or 898) can be separated from the major surface 826 of the insulation layer and extended as tabs beyond the lateral surfaces of the laterally compressed insulation section 890 to provide a water vapor transmission retarding barrier between the facing and the framing members and/or for attachment to the framing members. However, the installer may choose to leave the facing 822 bonded to the major surface of the insulation layer so that no lateral tabs are formed on the insulation layer or sections of the insulation layer when they are compressed laterally.
In
In
In describing the invention, certain embodiments have been used to illustrate the invention and the practices thereof. However, the invention is not limited to these specific embodiments as other embodiments and modifications within the spirit of the invention will readily occur to those skilled in the art on reading this specification. Thus, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, but is to be limited only by the claims appended hereto.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 10/703130 filed Nov. 6, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 10/465311 filed Jun. 19, 2003, which is a continuation of patent application Ser No. 10/394134 filed Mar. 20, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10801734 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11584709 | Oct 2006 | US |
Parent | 10394134 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10465311 | Jun 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10703130 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 10801734 | Mar 2004 | US |
Parent | 10465311 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10703130 | Nov 2003 | US |