This invention relates generally to furniture cushions and, more particularly, to furniture cushions including pocketed spring cores.
Typically, furniture cushions are commonly made in one of two types: foam core or spring core. Foam core cushions are the most common. They typically consist of a polyurethane foam core, fabricated by cutting from a larger slab or bun, and typically have a layer of polyester fiber applied to the top and bottom, or wrapped “bull-nose” top, front and bottom. Spring cushions are less common, typically preferred by higher end furniture manufacturers. They typically consist of a pocketed spring core, surrounded by a top and bottom layer of polyurethane foam, and a four-piece boxing made of polyurethane foam. The bottom layer is assembled with the boxing pieces using adhesive, the coil unit inserted into the cavity created, and the top foam layer glued in place to enclose the coil unit. The resulting assembly is then typically covered as above with a layer of polyester fiber.
There are other types of cushion constructions, usually designed for specialty markets. One such construction is the all-fiber cushion used in the outdoor furniture market. This construction contains only one type of material, although the layers of polyester fiber may be of various densities.
Foam cushions have their advantages. A foam core is very easy to fabricate—the desired thickness is slit from a bun, and the width and depth are cut from the slab. Odd shapes or sizes are easily cut from the slab or bun stock.
Foam cushions also have their disadvantages. Foam is relatively expensive; foam cost has been rising significantly faster in recent history than most other types of raw materials. The cost of foam is more volatile in general than other types of cushion components. Foam scrap from the fabricating process is not fully recyclable—it can only be shredded for use in low-value products or for making re-bonded foam. Foam loses a significant portion of its support very early in its life cycle, so a foam core cushion will lose support characteristics quickly during its life cycle, and will continue to lose support over the entire life cycle, leading to decreased consumer satisfaction and increased consumer returns. Foam has significantly less push back when a load is removed, compared to the resistance of the foam when the load is applied—this is felt by the occupant as less push from a cushion when getting up from the seated position. Foam is difficult to manufacture with consistency, and any given lot of foam will vary in its density and firmness. Foam is the most flammable of the cushion component choices. Smoldering foam creates toxic and explosive gases. Burning foam creates toxic gases. Foam cannot be manufactured with any post-consumer recycled content. Used foam is not practical to recycle.
Traditional spring cushions have their advantages. A coil spring unit (pocketed coil or otherwise) retains most of its support characteristics throughout its life cycle, so a cushion made with coils will retain more of its original support throughout use. A coil spring unit is more resilient than foam, pushing back with essentially the same force when a load is removed, as it resists the load when it is applied. Coils are typically much more consistent in firmness than foam, so any cushion made with coil content will typically be more consistent than a foam cushion.
Traditional spring cushions also have their disadvantages. Fabrication costs are higher, as the typical traditional spring cushion as described above will require six pieces of foam to be cut and sub-assembled, then assembled with the spring core. The foam component remaining in the top and bottom layers of the traditional spring cushion still share the same disadvantages as listed in the foam cushion above, although those disadvantages are proportionally less bothersome as the percentage of foam content decreases due to the use of a coil unit.
Fiber cushions have their advantages. Fiber will not retain water like foam, making it appropriate for use in outdoor cushions. Flammability is reduced compared to foam cushions, as are toxic or explosive by-products of burning. Fiber is more easily recyclable than foam.
Fiber cushions also have their disadvantages. Lofted fiber will lose height over its life cycle, which is seen as loose cushion covers and felt as a loss of overall seat height.
Finally, to make an acceptable finished cushion, the user must be insulated from the feel of the individual coils.
It is therefore an objective of this invention to reduce, or preferably eliminate, polyurethane foam from upholstered furniture cushion construction.
Another objective of this invention has been to provide a method of making a furniture cushion that reduces the labor and overhead associated with traditional methods of coil cushion construction.
Yet another objective of this invention has been to accomplish the previous objectives without compromising the ability to insulate the user from the feel of the individual coils.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the invention is a furniture cushion comprising a matrix of interconnected pocketed springs, each spring of which is contained within a pocket of fabric. Foam surrounds at least three sides of the matrix of interconnected pocketed springs to create a foam assembly. A fiber pad is wrapped bull-nose around the foam assembly so as to cover or overlay an upper surface of the matrix of pocketed springs, the fiber pad having a first layer in contact with the upper surface of the matrix of pocketed springs and a second layer in contact with the first layer, the first layer having a first density and the second layer having a second density, the first density being greater than the second density.
The fiber can be polyester fiber. The first layer can be a needle punched densified layer of polyester fiber and the second layer can be a loft layer of polyester fiber. The first density can range from about 3 pounds per cubic foot to about 10 pounds per cubic foot, and the second density can range from about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot to about 2.5 pounds per cubic foot. The fiber pad may underlie a lower surface of the matrix of pocketed springs, the first layer of the second fiber pad in contact with the lower surface of the matrix of pocketed springs and the second layer of the second fiber pad in contact with the first layer of the second fiber pad. The matrix of pocketed springs includes a pair of opposed side edges and a pair of opposed end edges. An upholstery cover may surround the fiber pad and foam assembly. The springs can be formed to be taller than the pockets, whereby the springs are pre-loaded in the pockets.
In another aspect, the invention is a furniture cushion comprising a foam assembly comprising a matrix of interconnected pocketed springs, each spring of which is contained within a pocket of fabric, and foam surrounding the matrix of interconnected pocketed springs. A fiber pad is wrapped bull-nose around the foam assembly so as to cover an upper surface, a front end edge, and a lower surface of the matrix of pocketed springs, the fiber pad having a first layer in contact with the upper and lower surfaces of the matrix of pocketed springs and a second layer in contact with the first layer, the first layer having a first density and the second layer having a second density, the first density being greater than the second density.
The fiber can be polyester fiber. The first layer can be a needle punched densified layer of polyester fiber, and the second layer can be a loft layer of polyester fiber. The first density can range from about 3 pounds per cubic foot to about 10 pounds per cubic foot, and the second density can range from about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot to about 2.5 pounds per cubic foot. The matrix of pocketed springs includes a pair of opposed side edges and a rear end edge and an upholstery cover surrounding the fiber pad and foam assembly. The springs can be formed to be taller than the pockets, whereby the springs are pre-loaded in the pockets.
In yet another aspect, the invention is a furniture cushion comprising a matrix of interconnected pocketed springs, each spring of which is contained within a pocket of fabric, a foam pad overlying an upper surface of the matrix of pocketed springs, and a fiber pad overlying an upper surface of the foam pad.
The foam can be polyethylene foam, and the fiber can be polyester fiber. The density of the polyethylene foam can range from about 1.5 pounds per cubic foot to about 2.0 pounds per cubic foot, and the density of the polyester fiber can range from about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot to about 2.5 pounds per cubic foot. The foam pad and fiber pad can be wrapped bull-nose around the matrix of pocketed springs so as to cover an upper surface, a front end edge, and a lower surface of the matrix of pocketed springs. The matrix of pocketed springs includes a pair of opposed side edges and a rear end edge; the cushion further comprises an edge loft layer of polyester fiber on each of the opposed side edges and rear end edge of the matrix of pocketed springs, and an upholstery cover surrounding the fiber pads and the edge fiber loft layers. The springs can be formed to be taller than the pockets, whereby the springs are pre-loaded in the pockets.
In yet another aspect, a furniture cushion comprises a matrix of interconnected pocketed springs, each spring of which is contained within a pocket of fabric. A foam border surrounds three sides of the matrix of interconnected pocketed springs. A fiber pad is wrapped bull-nose around the matrix of pocketed springs so as to cover an upper surface, front end edges and a lower surface of the matrix of pocketed springs. The fiber pad may have a first layer in contact with the upper surface of the matrix of springs and a second layer in contact with the first layer, the first layer having a first density and the second layer having a second density, the first density being greater than the second density.
The fiber can be polyester fiber. The first layer can be a needle punched densified layer of polyester fiber, and the second layer can be a loft layer of polyester fiber. The first density can range from about 3 pounds per cubic foot to about 10 pounds per cubic foot, and the second density can range from about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot to about 2.5 pounds per cubic foot. The fiber pad can be wrapped bull-nose around the matrix of springs so as to cover an upper surface, a front end edge, and a lower surface of said matrix of springs.
One advantage of the present invention is that polyurethane foam is reduced or eliminated from upholstered furniture cushion construction.
Another advantage of the present invention is that a method of making a furniture cushion is provided that reduces the labor and overhead associated with traditional methods of coil cushion construction.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is that the previous advantages have been provided without compromising the ability to insulate the user from the feel of the individual coils.
These and other objectives and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent during the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the Drawings herein.
Referring to
The fiber pad 14 includes a first layer 30 in contact with the upper surface 16 of the matrix 12 of pocketed springs, and a second layer 32 in contact with the first layer 30. The first layer 30 has a first density, and the second layer 32 has a second density; the first density is greater than the second density. The dual density fiber pad 14 can be fabricated of polyester fiber. The first layer 30 can be a needle punched densified layer of polyester, and the second layer 32 can be a loft layer of polyester fiber. This construction insulates the user from the feel of the individual coils. The densified layer 30 of polyester fiber can have a density ranging from about 3 pounds per cubic foot to about 10 pounds per cubic foot, with about 5 pounds per cubic foot being preferred. The densified layer 30 can range from about ⅛ inch thick to about ¼ inch thick. The loft layer 32 of polyester fiber can have a density ranging from about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot to about 2.5 pounds per cubic foot, with about 1.0 pounds per cubic foot being preferred. The loft layer 32 can range from about 1 inch thick to about 2 inches thick. The second fiber pad 18 is of similar construction; the first layer 30 thereof is in contact with the lower surface 20 of the matrix 12 of pocketed coils, and the second layer 32 thereof is in contact with the first layer 30. The layers 30 and 32 of the pads 14, 18 are preferably mechanically joined (as by needle punching) or bonded together by low melt fibers or other bonding agents. One suitable commercially available dual density polyester fiber pad is the 3.0 (ounce per square foot) PLV, available from Thomasville-Dexel, Inc., located in High Point, N.C.
The matrix 12 of pocketed coils includes a pair 40, 40 of opposed side edges and a pair 42, 42 of opposed end edges. The cushion 10 can further include an edge loft layer 44 of polyester on each of the opposed side edges 40, 40 of the matrix 12 of interconnected pocketed springs, and an edge loft layer 46 of polyester on each of the opposed end edges 42, 42 of the matrix 12 of interconnected pocketed springs. The edge loft layers 44, 46 can be a single length of loft polyester fiber, as illustrated, or any number of separate lengths of loft polyester fiber. The edge loft layers preferably have a density of about 0.5 pounds per cubic foot.
Finally, the cushion 10 can include an upholstery cover 50 surrounding the matrix 12 of pocketed springs, upper pad 14, lower pad 18, and edge layers 44, 46. The cover 50 can include a suitable closure mechanism, such as zipper 52.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The foam used for the foam border 82 may be any conventional upholstery seat cushioning foam. Typically, such foam is polyurethane, having a density between 1.5 and 2.2 pounds per cubic foot. The firmness of the foam is expressed in Indention Force Deflection (“IFD”). The foam used for the foam border 82 may have an IFD between 20 and 36 pounds, with 24 to 28 pounds being preferable. One suitable foam border used in this invention comprises polyurethane foam having an IFD of 28 pounds and a density of 1.8 pounds per cubic foot.
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
The method of making a cushion 80 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
The method of making a cushion 102 shown in
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
The method of making a cushion 122 shown in
The inventions described herein have a number of advantages. The cost of coil and fiber components are rising less quickly than foam, and tend to be more stable over time. The embodiments of
Manufacturing labor and resulting overhead costs are minimized. The coil units have come to be manufactured by highly automated processes. By maximizing the coil content of the cushion, the labor content of the cushion is minimized. Eliminating foam (
The advantages of coil spring units are similar to those listed for the traditional spring cushion above, but are maximized due to the maximized coil content. A coil spring unit (pocketed coil or otherwise) retains most of its support characteristics throughout its life cycle, so a cushion made with coils will retain more of its original support throughout use. A coil spring unit is more resilient than foam, pushing back with essentially the same force when a load is removed, as it resists the load when it is added. Coils are typically much more consistent in firmness than foam, so any cushion made with coil content will typically be more consistent than a foam cushion.
Flammability is reduced compared to foam cushions. By-products of burning polyester fibers or polypropylene fabric are not as toxic or explosive as by-products of burning foam. The steel wire in the coil units is not flammable and creates no dangerous by-products.
Total environmental impact is minimized. The steel, fiber, and fabric components of the cushion all may contain a percentage of post-consumer recycled content. Fiber scrap from the manufacturing process is fully recyclable and can be re-processed into first quality batting for use in full-value products. Used steel components are fully recoverable. Used fiber components are fully and easily recycled.
The embodiments shown and described are merely for illustrative purposes only. The drawings and the description are not intended to limit in any way the scope of the claims. Those skilled in the art will appreciate various changes, modifications, and other embodiments. For example, the fiber pad can have one layer of a needle punched shoddy pad made from a combination of waste fibers that may include polyester, rayon, cotton acrylics and about 10% polypropylene fibers that is thermically bonded to a polyester loft layer having a minimum of 10% low melt fibers. This composition has the advantage of being low cost and also provides for an easily controllable insulation since the shoddy pad may offer thickness and density variations that affect the comfort factor of the cushion. For example, in an instance where the pocketed coils were to be very soft (in a back cushion, for example), the shoddy pad could be made with a thickness of ¾ inch, improving the insulation factor of the cushion to prevent the occupant from feeling the coil and at the same time reducing the thickness of the loft, thus reducing the cost of the cushion. Stated another way, an advantage of using the needle punched shoddy pad is the thickness and density can be varied without drastically affecting the cost since the raw material cost of the shoddy pad versus the layer of densified polyester is on the order of about three to ten. All such changes, modifications and embodiments are deemed to be embraced by the claims. Accordingly, the scope of the right to exclude shall be limited only by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/171,099 filed Jun. 28, 2011 entitled “FURNITURE CUSHION”, which is fully incorporated herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
685160 | Marshall | Oct 1901 | A |
2313443 | Krakauer | Mar 1943 | A |
3138807 | Blecker | Jun 1964 | A |
3178735 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3923293 | Wiegand | Dec 1975 | A |
4234983 | Stumpf | Nov 1980 | A |
4424600 | Callaway | Jan 1984 | A |
4429427 | Sklar | Feb 1984 | A |
4449261 | Magnusson | May 1984 | A |
4862540 | Savenije | Sep 1989 | A |
5040255 | Barber, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5127635 | Long et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5317768 | Klancnik | Jun 1994 | A |
5327596 | Wallace et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
6490744 | Schulz, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7013515 | Price | Mar 2006 | B1 |
8302229 | Bullard et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
20040117913 | Gladney et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050097676 | Rensink | May 2005 | A1 |
20060116435 | Housel | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070006383 | Ogle et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070220680 | Miller et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080008862 | Ogle et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20110047710 | Beard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073239 | Manning et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130000043 | Bullard et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130000044 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13171099 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13402044 | US |