This application claims priority to DE Patent Application No. 10 2012 202 059.4 filed Feb. 10, 2012. The contents of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The disclosure relates to a fuse arrangement for safety fuses.
A safety fuse is an overcurrent protection facility, which interrupts the current circuit by fusing one or more fuse elements, if the current strength exceeds a specific value over a specific period of time. A safety fuse typically consists of an insulated body comprising two electrical connections, which are connected to one another inside the insulating body by way of the fuse element. The fuse element is heated by the current flowing therethrough, and when the nominal current of the fuse is clearly exceeded for a specific period of time, the fuse element melts to open the circuit.
Safety fuses of this type are used inter alia in the field of electrical installations in so-called electrical power distribution installations. Because space is limited in electrical power distribution installations, the electrical line to be fused is divided into several lines which are electrically connected in parallel with one another. The several lines are also fused in each instance with their own safety fuse. Here the maximum current strength across each of the several lines is reduced accordingly depending on the safety fuse of each of the several lines, so that narrower and flatter fuse bodies can be used in the electrical power distribution installation. By dividing the current across several fused lines, compact electrical power distribution installations can be used. Furthermore, the power loss and the I2t value are reduced by the parallel connection of the safety fuses.
In an electrical power distribution installation having electric lines connected in parallel, problems may arise if individual safety fuses are used therein. For example, problems may arise if the safety fuses can be individually disconnected from an electrical power distribution installation and exchanged for other individual safety fuses. While one may intend to replace a damaged safety fuse, an undamaged safety fuse may accidentally be replaced while the damaged safety fuse remains in the electrical power distribution installation. Furthermore, a safety fuse could be removed from the electrical power distribution installation and accidentally replaced by a safety fuse of a different type (with a correspondingly similar installation size). These possibilities are to be prevented under all circumstances against the background of more stringent procedures to ensure these problems do not occur.
One embodiment provides a fuse arrangement comprising: a first safety fuse, a second safety fuse, which is arranged adjacent to the first safety fuse and is provided with the first safety fuse for an electrical parallel connection, and an end plate, which is mechanically coupled to the first safety fuse and the second safety fuse, such that a structural unit is herewith formed.
In a further embodiment, the fuse arrangement comprises at least one further safety fuse, which is electrically connected in parallel to the first safety fuse and the second safety fuse and is likewise mechanically coupled to the end plate. In a further embodiment, the safety fuses each comprise a first contact and a second contact respectively.
In a further embodiment, the safety fuses each comprise a first contact and a second contact respectively.
In a further embodiment, the first contacts are arranged twisted about a longitudinal direction of the safety fuses relative to the second contacts.
In a further embodiment, at least one of the contacts comprises an inner thread for electrical contacting purposes.
In a further embodiment, the first contacts and/or the second contacts are embodied as blade contacts.
In a further embodiment, at least one of the blade contacts comprises a borehole for electrical contacting purposes.
In a further embodiment, at least one of the blade contacts is embodied with slots.
In a further embodiment, the first contacts each comprise a first slot which is aligned with a first direction, and the second contacts each comprise a second slot which is aligned along the longitudinal direction, oriented at right angles to the first direction.
Example embodiments of a fuse arrangement are described in more detail with the aid of the appended figures, in which:
Embodiments disclosed herein provide a fuse arrangement, which may overcome certain problems discussed above regarding conventional fuse arrangement.
In one embodiment, a fuse arrangement comprises a first safety fuse and a second safety fuse, which is arranged adjacent to the first safety fuse and is provided to form an electrical parallel connection with the first safety fuse. Furthermore, the fuse arrangement comprises an end plate, which is mechanically coupled to the first safety fuse and the second safety fuse such that a structural unit is herewith formed.
The first safety fuse and the second safety fuse are permanently connected to the end plate so that neither of the two safety fuses can be disconnected from the assembly of the fuse arrangement without the assistance of a tool. Alternatively, the safety fuses are undetachably connected to the end plate, so that one of the safety fuses may only be detached from the assembly by destruction of said safety fuse and/or the end plate. A simple disassembly and thus replacement of only one of the two safety fuses is therefore no longer possible. Because the first safety fuse and the second safety fuse now form a structural unit of two safety fuses connected electrically in parallel with one another, assembly and/or disassembly of individual safety fuses is precluded. The parallel connection of several safety fuses can use narrower and flatter safety bodies, because the maximum current strength of the individual safety fuses, which are electrically connected in parallel, is reduced accordingly. The installation space required for the arrangement can therefore be kept correspondingly more compact than would be the case with a single safety fuse having a corresponding maximum current strength of three times more.
The electrical parallel connection of the first safety fuse and the second safety fuse can take place by way of the end plate, which may be conductive. Alternatively however, a non-conductive end plate can also be used, for instance made of plastic, wherein in this case the electrical parallel connection of the first and second safety fuse takes place by way of the electrical connections and/or contacts of the safety fuses.
In one embodiment, the fuse arrangement comprises at least one further safety fuse, which is electrically connected in parallel to the first safety fuse and the second safety fuse and is likewise mechanically coupled to the end plate. With the aid of a correspondingly embodied end plate, depending on the application, three or more safety fuses can also be connected to the end plate without any large structural outlay and thus combined to form a structural unit. The structural unit may then be assembled and disassembled relative to an electrical power distribution installation such that a disconnection of an individual safety fuse from the electrical power distribution installation is no longer possible.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, the safety fuses comprise in each instance a first contact and in each instance a second contact. The first contacts and second contacts are guided out of the safety body of the respective safety fuse and are used to electrically contact the respective safety fuse.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, the first contacts are arranged twisted about a longitudinal direction of the safety fuses relative to the second contacts. Each first contact may be at 45° or 90° about the longitudinal direction relative to the second contact of the relevant safety fuse. The fuse arrangement can in this way be flexibly adjusted to the most varied of operating conditions.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, at least one of the contacts comprises an inner thread for electrical contacting purposes. With the aid of the inner thread, which may be embodied as a metric ISO thread, the fuse can also be electrically connected by means of a corresponding screw connection, for instance of the M10 or M12 type.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, the first contacts and/or the second contacts are embodied as blade contacts. Blade contacts are also referred to as contact blades and are embodied in a correspondingly compact manner in order to conduct higher currents.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, at least one of the blade contacts comprises a borehole for electrical contacting purposes.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, at least one of the blade contacts is embodied with slots. Slotted blade contacts enable a quick and simple fastening and contacting of the fuse arrangement, for instance on a busbar.
In a further embodiment of the fuse arrangement, the first contacts each comprise a first slot, which is aligned with a first direction. The second contacts each comprise a second slot, which is aligned along the longitudinal direction, oriented at right angles to the first direction. By the first slots being aligned in the first direction and the second slots in the second direction, which is oriented at right angles, e.g., perpendicular, to the first direction, a compensatory tolerance is realized, i.e. a possibility of compensating for manufacturing tolerances relating to the dimensions of the individual safety fuses. A higher flexibility in respect of adjustment to different operating conditions of the fuse arrangement is achieved in this way by the varied alignment of the slots.
The first contacts 21 and 22 are embodied as slotted blade contacts and to this end comprise in each instance a first slot 24 and/or 25, which is aligned respectively with a first direction A. Similarly, the second contacts 31 and 32 are embodied as slotted blade contacts and each comprise a second slot 34 and/or 35, which is aligned in each instance with a second direction B, which is oriented essentially at right angles to the first direction A. On account of the different, essentially perpendicular alignment of the first slots 24 and 25 relative to the second slots 34 and 35, a compensatory tolerance, i.e. possibility of compensating for manufacturing specific dimensional tolerances of the individual safety fuses, is enabled. The use of slotted blade contacts 21, 22, 31 and 32 further makes it possible to fasten and connect the fuse arrangement 10-1 rapidly and simply, for instance to corresponding connection structures, e.g., blade receptacles, of a conventional busbar, e.g., as shown in
With this embodiment, three essentially structurally identical safety fuses 11, 12 and 13 are electrically connected in parallel to one another, so that the electric current splits into the three safety fuses 11, 12 and 13. The maximum current strength of this fuse arrangement 10-2 thus corresponds to three times the maximum current strength of the individual, structurally identical safety fuses 11, 12 and 13. The individual safety fuses 11, 12 and 13 can in this way be embodied to be narrower and flatter so that the installation space required for this fuse arrangement 10-2 can be kept correspondingly more compact than would be the case with a single safety fuse having a maximum current strength of correspondingly three times more.
A third exemplary embodiment of the fuse arrangement 10-3 is shown schematically in several views in
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 202 059 | Feb 2012 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2167608 | Cole | Jul 1939 | A |
3152231 | Edsall | Oct 1964 | A |
3156801 | Cole et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3489978 | Mikulecky | Jan 1970 | A |
3639873 | Hodgson | Feb 1972 | A |
3810063 | Blewitt | May 1974 | A |
3838375 | Frind et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4355269 | Burton | Oct 1982 | A |
4691197 | Damiano | Sep 1987 | A |
4906963 | Ackermann et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5982267 | Locht | Nov 1999 | A |
6304429 | Locht et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6459356 | Dout et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476705 | Betti et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6509824 | Inaba et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6753754 | Black et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7378933 | Rogers | May 2008 | B2 |
7515031 | Jakobsen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7808362 | Stanek et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
1045051 | Mallory | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20020080005 | Mollet et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030085048 | Lindholm et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050237147 | Carreras | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060284721 | Jakobsen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070159291 | Wilniewczyc et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20110148564 | Staylor | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
335351 | Dec 1958 | CH |
2342464 | Oct 1999 | CN |
1795523 | Jun 2006 | CN |
672563 | Mar 1939 | DE |
295336 | Nov 2015 | DE |
593784 | Oct 1947 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action, Application No. 201310050152.8, 15 pages, Oct. 28, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130207769 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |