The present invention relates to a fuse cutout that can be used with power distribution systems to protect against electrical overload. Outdoor cutouts, such as a high voltage dropout fuse, may provide overcurrent protection for equipment that can be damaged by system overload or fault conditions. Such outdoor cutouts may be used to clear fault or overload currents on a section of an overhead distribution line or a damaged piece of equipment.
An outdoor cutout may include a fuse tube (including a fuse element) and a mounting insulator that electrically isolates the conductive portions of the cutout from the support to which the cutout is fastened. The mounting insulator typically includes an outer shield. The outer shield generally includes a number of radially extending fins for increasing creep and flashover distance on the exterior of the insulator. In conventional systems, the outer shield is formed by over-molding the insulator as a single piece.
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings may identify the same or similar elements.
Systems and/or methods described herein relate to a support bracket for a fuse cutout. In one implementation, the support bracket may include an insulating rod with a first threaded standoff at a top end of the insulating rod and a second threaded standoff at a bottom end of the insulating rod. One or more shed sleeves may be secured, via an interference fit, over an outside surface of the insulating rod between the first threaded standoff and the second threaded standoff. The interior surfaces of the one or more shed sleeves form a dielectric interface between the outside surface of the insulating rod and the interior surface of the shed sleeve. A mounting bracket may be secured to a portion of the support bracket between the first threaded standoff and the second threaded standoff. The one or more shed sleeves may be pre-molded prior to installation over the insulating rod.
In another implementation, a support bracket for a fuse cutout may include an insulating rod having a top portion, a bottom portion opposite the top portion, and a middle portion between the top portion and the bottom portion. A first shed sleeve may be secured, via an interference fit, over an outside surface of the top portion, such that an interior surface of the first shed sleeve forms a dielectric interface between the outside surface of the top portion and the interior surface of the first shed sleeve. Similarly, a second shed sleeve may be secured, via another interference fit, over an outside surface of the bottom portion, such that an interior surface of the second shed sleeve forms a dielectric interface between the outside surface of the bottom portion and the interior surface of the second shed sleeve. A mounting bracket may be secured to the middle portion of the insulating rod between the first shed sleeve and the second shed sleeve.
As used in this disclosure with reference to the apparatus (e.g., device 10), the term “high voltage” refers to equipment configured to operate at a nominal system voltage above 3 kilovolts (kV). Thus, the term “high voltage” refers to equipment suitable for use in electric utility service, such as in systems operating at nominal voltages of about 3 kV to about 38 kV, commonly referred to as “distribution” systems, as well as equipment for use in “transmission” systems, operating at nominal voltages above about 38 kV.
Device 10 may generally include a support bracket 100 that supports a fuse assembly 200. Device 10 may provide overcurrent protection for equipment that can be damaged by system overload or fault conditions. As shown in
Mounting bracket 104 may include an elbow section 105 and a ring 106 formed, for example, of galvanized steel. Elbow section 105 (also referred to as a flange) may include a mounting aperture and an angled frame to allow device 10 to be mounted to a grounding element at an angle from vertical (e.g., as shown in
Each threaded standoff 108 may include, for example, a male or female hex connector with a stud mounted thereon. The hex connector of threaded standoff 108 may be mounted to an end of insulating core 103 so as to form a shoulder 109 at the interface of insulating core 103 and threaded standoff 108. In one implementation, threaded standoff 108 may receive an end bracket 110 (which may abut against shoulder 109), secured via a washer 112 and a nut 114 onto the stud of standoff 108. To keep end bracket 110 from rotating, a hex shaped aperture may be machined into end bracket 110 to match the hex shape portion of threaded standoff 108. When end bracket 110, washer 112, and nut 114 are secured to each threaded standoff 108 at the ends of insulating rod 102, fuse assembly 200 may be mounted to each end bracket 110.
Support bracket 100 may also include an upper insulator shed sleeve 120 and a lower insulator shed sleeve 130 (referred to herein collectively as “insulator shed sleeves 120/130” or generically as “insulator shed sleeve 120/130”) to prevent voltage flashover or voltage tracking due to moisture and contamination. Insulator shed sleeves 120/130 may generally be formed from, for example, a dielectric silicone, a thermoplastic elastomer or rubber, which is vulcanized under heat and pressure, such as an ethylene-propylene-dienemonomer (EPDM) elastomer. According to implementations described herein, insulator shed sleeves 120/130 may be pre-molded components with an interior bore that is sized to be forced over the circumference of insulating rod 102 and maintain position via an interference fit with insulating core 103. In one implementation, the pre-molded shed sleeves 120/130 may be manufactured in an automated manner that removes the flash (e.g., unwanted material left by the molding process) without manual processing.
The outer surface of insulating core 103 (e.g., along the circumference of insulating rod 102) is generally smooth and cylindrical to provide clean contact with an interior surface of each insulator shed sleeve 120/130. The interference fit (also referred to as a friction fit) ensures that an interior surface of each insulator shed sleeve 120/130 forms a dielectric interface between the outside surface insulating rod 102 and insulator shed sleeve 120/130.
In some implementations, insulator shed sleeves 120/130 may each include a number of radially extending fins 122/132 for increasing a creep distance on an exterior of support bracket 100. Fins 122/132 may be desirable in above-ground or weather-exposed switch installations. Increased creep distance may be provided, for example, by changing the spacing and/or dimensions of fins 122/132 on insulator shed sleeves 120/130.
In one implementation, the configuration of upper insulator shed sleeve 120 and lower insulator shed sleeve 130 may be identical to provide interchangeable components for upper insulator shed sleeve 120 and lower insulator shed sleeve 130. In another implementation, as shown in
As shown in
In contrast, referring collectively to
Process 800 may also include sliding a pre-molded upper shed sleeve over an outside surface of a top portion of the insulating rod to form dielectric interface between the outside surface of the top portion and the interior surface of the upper shed sleeve (block 830). For example, upper shed sleeve 120 may be pushed over a top end of insulating rod 102 so that the top portion of insulating rod 102 fills central bore 124 and forms a dielectric interface between insulating rod 102 and upper shed sleeve 120 along the exterior of insulating rod 102 between mounting bracket 104 and top threaded standoff 108.
Process 800 may also include sliding a pre-molded lower shed sleeve over an outside surface of a bottom portion of the insulating rod to form dielectric interface between the outside surface of the bottom portion and the interior surface of the lower shed sleeve (block 840). For example, lower shed sleeve 130 may be pushed over a bottom end of insulating rod 102 so that the bottom portion of insulating rod 102 fills central bore 132 and forms a dielectric interface between insulating rod 102 and lower shed sleeve 130 along the exterior of insulating rod 102 between mounting bracket 104 and bottom threaded standoff 108.
Providing pre-molded shed sleeves that may be applied over an insulating rod for a fuse cutout support bracket, simplifies manufacturing and eliminates the complicated overmolding process used to manufacture conventional support brackets. Additionally, the pre-molded shed sleeves reduce instances of manually removing flash. Flash from the conventional molding process must be removed (typically manually) after the part is molded to avoid tracking on the flash line due to contamination buildup. Similarly, scrap from molding defects during manufacturing can be reduced by eliminating instances where an entire support bracket must be scrapped due to defects in a shed. Furthermore, material types for sheds may be easily adapted to meet customer preferences (e.g., a preference for silicone or EPDM). Also, implementations using pre-molded shed sleeves that leave the mounting bracket (e.g., mounting bracket 104) uncovered may eliminate known problems with erosion through the shed insulation around the mounting bracket.
The foregoing description of exemplary implementations provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments described herein to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the embodiments.
Although the invention has been described in detail above, it is expressly understood that it will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that the invention may be modified without departing from the spirit of the invention. Various changes of form, design, or arrangement may be made to the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the above-mentioned description is to be considered exemplary, rather than limiting, and the true scope of the invention is that defined in the following claims.
No element, act, or instruction used in the description of the present application should be construed as critical or essential to the invention unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein, the article “a” is intended to include one or more items. Further, the phrase “based on” is intended to mean “based, at least in part, on” unless explicitly stated otherwise.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119, based on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/968,020 filed Mar. 20, 2014, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3868615 | Haubein et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3898372 | Kalb | Aug 1975 | A |
3962667 | Link | Jun 1976 | A |
4527028 | Luehring | Jul 1985 | A |
4714438 | Williams | Dec 1987 | A |
4724284 | Wheeler | Feb 1988 | A |
4744765 | DeLeo | May 1988 | A |
4822289 | DeLeo | Apr 1989 | A |
4859192 | DeLeo | Aug 1989 | A |
4896008 | Aoki et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4941834 | DeLeo | Jul 1990 | A |
5131855 | Pickering | Jul 1992 | A |
5214249 | Goch | May 1993 | A |
5563379 | Kunieda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5667060 | Luzzi | Sep 1997 | A |
6075209 | Luzzi | Jun 2000 | A |
6172317 | Wristen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6225567 | Kester | May 2001 | B1 |
6310310 | Wristen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6462639 | Farag et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485326 | Trainor et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6593842 | Haynam et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6952154 | Almgren et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7094974 | Ohkawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7180003 | Almgren et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7435120 | Janicke et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7532103 | Almgren et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7661979 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7717736 | Chua et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7772515 | Skiving et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7883356 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7909635 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8038457 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049129 | Wristen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20020135452 | White | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020158745 | Haynam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040155014 | Schreiber et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20080174399 | Benke | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090160598 | Benke et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201845734 | May 2011 | CN |
202013858 | Oct 2011 | CN |
202042292 | Nov 2011 | CN |
202423198 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202549769 | Nov 2012 | CN |
19921477 | Nov 2000 | DE |
2634786 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2868875 | Oct 2005 | FR |
2001084854 | Mar 2001 | JP |
4400955 | Jan 2010 | JP |
0041199 | Jul 2000 | WO |
20006273 | May 2001 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Doug Lescarbeau and Rob Dunkel, “Increasing Strength and Reliability of Interference Fits”, Oct. 1, 2013, Assembly Magazine, Entire Document. |
“BOSS 9609 Press Fit Retaining Compound”, BOSS Products, Aug. 26, 2016, Entire Document. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action issued in corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,881,884; dated Feb. 15, 2016; 4 pages. |
European Patent Office; European Search Report issued in corresponding Application No. 15157310.2; dated Mar. 8, 2015; 10 pages. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; Search Report issued in corresponding Chines Patent Application No. 201510112005.8; dated Mar. 13, 2015; 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150270087 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61968020 | Mar 2014 | US |