The present disclosure generally relates to fuse systems and, in particular, to an electrical fuse system having both a non-serviceable fuse and a serviceable connection facilitating use of a serviceable fuse, if needed.
Fuses are commonly-used in various products to protect electrical components and wiring from receiving unintended high levels of electrical current that could otherwise damage the protected components and wiring. In particular, fuses are positioned in electrical circuits between the power source and the component or wiring to be protected. When a fuse experiences an electrical current level that exceeds a threshold current (rated for the particular fuse), the fuse “blows,” thereby disconnecting the power source from the protected wiring or component. Thus, the protected component or wiring is protected from the unintended high current level.
Many electrical distribution centers, such as those used for motor vehicles, utilize loose-piece replaceable fuses to protect electrical components and wiring. These replaceable fuses come in various sizes with various current-handling capabilities and are typically chosen based on the current-carrying requirements of the circuit they are intended to protect. They are typically installed between two terminals in a system in an accessible location. If such a conventional serviceable fuse blows in the field, it is may be replaced with a similar fuse by a consumer or service person, such as, in the case of motor vehicles, a mechanic in a garage. Examples of replaceable fuses may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,346,411 entitled “Tap-In Blade Fuse”; U.S. Pat. No. 2,527,160 entitled “Plug Type Fuse”; and U.S. Pat. No, 3,581,262 entitled “Safety Fuse With Glass Coating On Fusible Portion.” Such replaceable fuses offer the advantage of being readily available to the consumer or the mechanic at the time that a replacement is needed. When replacement fuses are in an accessible location, they are readily removed and replaced and are therefore referred to herein as “serviceable fuses.”
As an alternative to the above-described serviceable fuses, some electrical distribution centers use non-replaceable or “non-serviceable fuses” to protect electrical components and wiring. Non-replaceable fuses are commonly integrated onto circuit boards during manufacture and cannot be replaced or serviced without replacing the entire circuit board. Examples of non-serviceable fuses may be found in United States Patent Application Number 2005233515 entitled “Method Of Etching A Semiconductor Device”; United States Patent Application Number 2003205777 entitled “Integrated Fuse With Regions Of Different Doping Within The Fuse Neck”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,552,757 entitled “Surface-Mounted Fuse Device”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,923,239 entitled “Printed Circuit Board Assembly Having An Integrated Fusible Link”; and German Patent Number 3,723,832 entitles “Printed Circuit With An Integrated Fuse.” Other “non-serviceable fuses within the meaning of this disclosure include fuses that would otherwise be replaceable but for their physical location in the system (i.e., fuses that are positioned in inaccessible locations).
While serviceable fuses are conveniently replaceable, they can represent a significant cost to the manufacturer of the original product in comparison to the use non-serviceable fuses. A serviceable fuse is more costly to manufacture than a non-serviceable fuse. Further, a serviceable fuse must be physically installed, either manually or by machine, in the terminals in the electrical distribution center assembly, thereby adding additional steps and costs to the manufacturing process. Even where the installation is accomplished automatically, various steps in the automated process, such as manual loading of the supply tubes for the automatic insertion equipment, must still be performed manually. On the other hand, non-serviceable fuses are less costly to manufacture and they do not require any special handling or fixturing. However, when such a non-serviceable fuse blows, it is not possible for a mechanic or consumer to rapidly and inexpensively replace the fuse alone. Instead, the entire device or a circuit board (on which the non-serviceable fuse resides) must be replaced when a non-serviceable fuse blows. Thus, it is significantly more costly to replace a non-serviceable fuse (i.e., replace an entire circuit board) than to replace a serviceable fuse.
As a result, a dilemma exists in designing fuses into electrical systems. It may be advantageous to a manufacturer to choose a non-serviceable fuse instead of a serviceable fuse at the time of manufacture to save manufacturing cost. However, it may be disadvantageous to have a non-serviceable fuse rather than a serviceable fuse at the time that a repair is needed, since the repair will be more expensive. Thus, the choice of a non-serviceable fuse may increase warranty cost and consumer dissatisfaction. Hence, in retrospect, if the fuse never blows, a non-serviceable fuse is more cost effective, but if the fuse blows during the lifetime of the electrical system, a serviceable fuse is more cost effective.
The embodiments disclosed herein are intended to address this dilemma. Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided herein. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the present invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present application discloses a fuse system having both a non-serviceable fuse and a fuse terminal system for selectively installing a serviceable fuse. The fuse terminal system has first and second terminals for selectively connecting a serviceable fuse in electrical parallel with the non-serviceable fuse.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example in greater detail with reference to the attached figures, in which:
Disclosed herein is a fuse system having both a non-serviceable fuse and a fuse terminal system for selectively installing a serviceable fuse. The fuse terminal system has first and second terminals for selectively connecting a serviceable fuse in electrical parallel with the non-serviceable fuse. The “non-serviceable fuse” is, in most embodiments, a non-replaceable type fuse integrated onto a circuit board, but it may also be other types of fuses that are difficult to service, such as a replaceable type fuse that is particularly inaccessible to the mechanic or consumer at the time replacement is needed. The fuse terminal system is configured to be used with replaceable fuses, such as those commonly used in motor vehicle applications or in consumer electronics, referred to herein as “serviceable fuses.”
Refer now to the drawings wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views and exemplary embodiments are illustrated. FIGS. 1A and 3-5 illustrate an exemplary fuse system 10 protecting an electrical component (not shown), which may include an electrical device, an electrical circuit, or electrical wiring. The fuse system 10 includes both (i) a non-serviceable fuse 20 disposed between electrical contacts 22 and 24 and (ii) a terminal system comprising terminals 16 and 18 for selectively connecting a serviceable fuse 30. Terminals 16 and 18 are in electrical communication with contacts 22 and 24, respectively. The fuse system 10 is intended to be electrically connected at terminals 22 and 24 generally between a power source (not shown) and the protected electrical component. The fuse system 10 may be assembled on a board 12, such as a printed circuit board. As will be described later herein, the board 12 may be used solely for the fuse system 10, may support additional fuse assemblies or, alternatively, may support the electrical component protected by the fuse system 10.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The exemplary fuse terminal system (i.e., terminals 16 and 18) shown in
As shown in
A web 56 of material, which may be formed in a molding process when the cover 50 is created, may be provided across at least one of the slots or apertures 52 or 54. The web 56 may be broken by one of the blades 32 or 34 of a replacement or serviceable fuse 30 when a serviceable fuse is installed in the terminal assembly, as shown in
Thus, in use, the fuse system 10 or 10′ described above relies upon non-serviceable fuse 20 or 20′ to provide protection against unintended high electrical currents in the first instance. If and when the non-serviceable fuse blows, it can be easily “replaced” by installing a serviceable fuse 30 in the fuse terminal system (terminals 16 and 18). If the non-serviceable fuse never blows, then there is no need to ever install a serviceable fuse. In this way, the initial cost of manufacturing the electrical system is reduced as compared to having to install at the outset a serviceable fuse that may never blow, while, at the same time, the fuse terminal system provides a relatively convenient and low-cost option for “replacing” a blown non-serviceable fuse (with a serviceable fuse) without having to replace the entire circuit board.
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. Many alternative approaches or applications other than the examples provided would be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading the above description. The scope of the invention should be determined, not with reference to the above description, but should instead be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is anticipated and intended that future developments will occur in the arts discussed herein, and that the disclosed systems and methods will be incorporated into such future examples. In sum, it should be understood that the invention is capable of modification and variation and is limited only by the following claims.
The present embodiments have been particularly shown and described, which are merely illustrative of the best modes. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various alternatives to the embodiments described herein may be employed in practicing the claims without departing from the spirit and scope as defined in the following claims. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that the method and apparatus within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby. This description should be understood to include all novel and non-obvious combinations of elements described herein, and claims may be presented in this or a later application to any novel and non-obvious combination of these elements. Moreover, the foregoing embodiments are illustrative, and no single feature or element is essential to all possible combinations that may be claimed in this or a later application.
All terms used in the claims are intended to be given their broadest reasonable constructions and their ordinary meanings as understood by those skilled in the art unless an explicit indication to the contrary is made herein. In particular, use of the singular articles such as “a,” “the,” “said,” etc. should be read to recite one or more of the indicated elements unless a claim recites an explicit limitation to the contrary.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/834,591 entitled FUSES WITH SERVICEABLE CONNECTIONS filed Aug. 1, 2006, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3237060 | Ross | Feb 1966 | A |
3437736 | Claypoole et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3668476 | Wrabel et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3723932 | Miller et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
4346345 | Welz | Aug 1982 | A |
4394639 | McGalliard | Jul 1983 | A |
4499447 | Greenberg | Feb 1985 | A |
4775064 | Baxter | Oct 1988 | A |
4815993 | Falchetti | Mar 1989 | A |
4909552 | Weber et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4912449 | Bonhomme | Mar 1990 | A |
5099219 | Roberts | Mar 1992 | A |
5281171 | Job | Jan 1994 | A |
5471193 | Peterson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5552757 | Blecha et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5629663 | Seki et al. | May 1997 | A |
5654701 | Liao et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659283 | Arratia | Aug 1997 | A |
5662245 | Grant | Sep 1997 | A |
5808859 | Liang | Sep 1998 | A |
5818320 | Matsuoka | Oct 1998 | A |
5894925 | Sukiennik et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923239 | Krueger et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928004 | Sumida et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6007350 | Isshiki | Dec 1999 | A |
6107908 | Santa Cruz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119898 | Dark | Sep 2000 | A |
6260942 | Ahne et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6330959 | Dark | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6411482 | Funke | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416091 | Wenk et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6878004 | Oh | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020008607 | Castonguay et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020135481 | Conwell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030205777 | Ito et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040041887 | Beilman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040196135 | Clair | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209028 | Gosselin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040252446 | Friedrich et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029158 | Moore et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062578 | Ackermann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050233515 | Ng et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050275499 | Kita | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060017540 | Smith | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046526 | Minich | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060100576 | Wang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060165465 | Wu | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3040884 | May 1982 | DE |
3723832 | Jul 1987 | DE |
3743482 | Jul 1989 | DE |
2852140 | Sep 2004 | FR |
2899997 | Oct 2007 | FR |
03077395 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080030294 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60834591 | Aug 2006 | US |