Fuses have long been necessary parts of electrical circuits, providing quick protection of circuits from overloads. Many fuses have parts that are familiar, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,560,971. A fuse includes a fuse body, a conductor or fuse element within the body, and two end caps or ferrules for connection into a fuseholder or other connecting portions of a circuit. Of course, these same parts may be used in fuses large and small, and also for loads large and small. However, as circuits and circuitry get smaller, fuses also need to reduce their size. See, for example, the Nano2® Fuse series from Littelfuse, Inc., intended for use on very small surface-mounted circuits, in which many parts are actually printed onto the substrate.
When working with large fuses, it is relatively simply to assemble the fuse. The fuse element may be several inches long, as is the body, and the ferrules or other termination may be ½ inch (about 1.3 cm) or larger in diameter. Placing the parts together, by hand or in fixtures, is relatively simple and is easily accomplished. However, when the entire fuse is much reduced in size, such as fuses intended for surface-mount applications, the difficulty is increased. Many of the fuses in the above-mentioned series are less than ½ inch (about 1.3 cm) in length, and may be only about ⅛ of an inch (about 0.3 cm) in both width and depth. These small sizes are necessary to conform to the scale of the circuitry in surface-mount technology.
It is challenging to assemble reliable fuses on this small scale, principally because the requirements for reliability are high, while the size of the fuse, and all its internal bonds are small. The consistency and reliability of solder bonds are very important characteristics that must be built into the fuse. X-rays or other inspection techniques may occasionally reveal fuses which have inferior bonds. However, the trend in manufacturing is not to inspect quality into the parts, but rather to design a process in which reliability is almost inherent. That is, the present manufacturing process continually strives to consistently attain 100% reliable fuse products. Of course, the structure of a fuse, and the process for making the fuse, may vary drastically from the process described here. See, e.g., the fuses and the processes described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,977,860, and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,322. Fuses described in these patents are made by entirely different processes,
Without being bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the problem with the present process is that assembly requires the application of consistent external force and air pressure to reliably fit and bond the parts together. This presents no problem with the first end cap, because the opposite end is still open, allowing gas to escape. When the second end cap is secured, however, it is believed that this process traps pressurized air inside the fuse body. The pressurized gas exerts a force on the end caps, tending to move them off the fuse body. To control this, both external force and air pressure are applied. The external force holds the fuse parts together while the external air pressure will balance the pressure inside the fuse and prevent solder from coming out of the fuse assembly. This part of the process is important for attaining reliable bonds and is not easy to consistently control. Any undesirable variation in the operations will lead to inferior bonds.
The present invention is directed to solving this problem by using improved fuse components and a better process.
There are many embodiments of the present invention. One embodiment is a fuse. The fuse includes a hollow body having two ends and at least one slot on both ends, the slots and a central cavity of the hollow body forming a continuum allowing passage of gasses or air from the central cavity to an outer surface of the body, a metallic element passing through the body, and a metallic cap on both ends in electrical communication with the wire, wherein when the fuse is assembled, the slots are closed and the central cavity does not communicate to the outer surface of the body. The metallic element may be a wire.
Another embodiment is a fuse. The fuse includes a hollow body having an inner surface, the body having two ends and at least two slots on each end in communication with the inner surface, a metallic wire extending through the hollow body, and a metallic cap soldered on each end and joined to the metallic wire.
Yet another embodiment is also a fuse. The fuse includes a hollow ceramic body having an inner surface, the body having two ends with at least one slot on at least one end, the at least one slot extending from the inner surface to an outer surface of the end, a metallic element extending through the body, and a metallic cap sealed to each end of the body.
Another embodiment is a method of making a fuse. The method includes a step of providing a hollow fuse body with first and second ends and a slot on at least one of the ends, the at least one slot in communication with a central cavity of the hollow fuse body, joining the body to a first metallic cap on the first end, connecting a metallic element to the first metallic cap, the metallic element extending through the body, and joining a second metallic cap to the metallic element and to the second end.
Additional features and advantages are described herein, and will be apparent from, the following Detailed Description and the figures.
There are many embodiments of the invention, of which the embodiments depicted and described herein are only a few examples. The fuses with hollow slotted bodies are preferably used for surface-mount applications, because these fuses are easily adapted to mass manufacturing techniques. In some embodiments, the fuses depicted herein are relatively small, for example, about 11 mm long (about 0.4 inches) and are have a cross section generally in the form of a square, a square with rounded corners, a circle, a rectangle, or a rectangle with rounded corners, and having a body width/depth of about 2.9 mm and a cap width/depth of about 3.1 mm. Other sizes may be used. The solder pads prepared for these fuses are preferably two square pads about 3.4 mm wide by about 3.2 mm long, such that both pads fit into a length about 12.6 mm (about ½ inch) long. Other sizes and configurations may be used.
A first embodiment of a fuse is shown and described in
The hollow body is preferably ceramic, such as aluminum oxide, alumina, but may instead be made from mullite or other insulative, inexpensive and available materials. The body may also be made from a glass-ceramic material, from glass, or from virtually any non-conductive material that is capable of service in this application. Even a plastic or fiberglass body could work, so long as the material is capable of withstanding soldering temperatures or other processing temperatures typically involved in the fabrication of printed circuit boards, especially surface-mount type printed circuit boards. The end caps are silver-plated brass, for excellent conductivity and ease of soldering, but they could also be gold plated, tin/lead plated or plated with another suitable material. Solder suitable for the application and temperatures involved should be used. While solder is clearly preferred, other methods of attachment could be used, such as welding or brazing, for instance for very high temperature applications.
In addition to the embodiment of
Without being bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the slots enable gasses within the hollow body to escape from the body during the placing and bonding of the second cap. The process, as will be explained below, includes the application of force during bonding. If pressurized gas remains within the body after the solder flow is complete, the pressurized gas will tend to urge the cap away from the body and may result in inferior bonds. It is believed that the slots allow the gas to escape during the solder process, thus eliminating the problem of trapped, pressurized gas. As a result, only one end of the fuse need have slots, the end that is bonded and soldered second. However, with modern mass production and material handing techniques, it will be tedious to align fuse bodies so that the end without a slot is capped and soldered first while the end with the slot is capped and soldered second. Thus, even though it is believed that the advantage will accrue with a single slot, it is easier and more practical to have a slot on both ends.
As mentioned, it is believed that the purpose served by the slot is to allow air from the hollow center to escape. Thus, the slot needs to connect the inner hollow to the outside of the fuse body. Another embodiment that meets this requirement is depicted in
Many fuses have been made and tested with the new slotted bodies. In order to form a fuse that will not fail mechanically during or after assembly to a printed circuit board, it is desired that the bond strength between the cap and the body can withstand an axial force of at least 2 lbs. The average force for caps made with bodies without slots is about 3.5 lbs. However, even with this excellent performance, there are outliers that may fail during assembly to a printed circuit board, or may fail later in service. Tests made with the embodiment of
A method of making fuses using the new slotted bodies is depicted in the flowchart of
Solder is then placed 44 into the second end cap and melted, and heat is applied at atmospheric pressure 45 to join the other end of the fuse body to the second end cap. The body, now with a fuse wire and two end caps attached, is now cooled 46 in a sealed cooling chamber at about 16-22 psig to consolidate the bonds and form the fuse. This process takes about 1-2 minutes. Afterwards, a sample of the fuses are tested 47 to insure electrical continuity and the strength of the bond. Samples may also be x-rayed or subjected to other non-destructive testing to assure the strength and quality of the internal bonds.
The shape of the fuse embodiments is not limited to straight, in-line embodiments as shown above. Other embodiments, as shown in
It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, most of the embodiments depict four slots, two on each end, at right angles to a longitudinal axis of the fuse body. It has been pointed out that angled slots may advantageously be used. In other embodiments, there may be three or four slots on each end, and the slots may go through the corners of the fuse body, rather than spanning them as shown. The slots are shown rather wide, but in some embodiments, the slots may be only a little wider than the width of the wire or fuse element used for the fuse. This may help retain solder within the body, helping to form the solder dome, during manufacturing. The slots themselves may have a cross section in the form of a circle, a portion of a circle, a rounded rectangle, a rounded square, a rounded trapezoid or a rounded parallelogram, or even a triangle.
Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present subject matter and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1773182 | Hickey | Aug 1930 | A |
1773184 | Hickey | Aug 1930 | A |
1831002 | Hickey | Nov 1931 | A |
1902568 | Maxam | Mar 1933 | A |
1904691 | Magee | Apr 1933 | A |
2640125 | Eggers | May 1953 | A |
3460086 | Fister | Aug 1969 | A |
3601574 | Fiddler | Aug 1971 | A |
3644861 | Fister | Feb 1972 | A |
3719912 | Harner et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3735309 | Hurtle | May 1973 | A |
3775723 | Mamrick et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3775724 | Mamrick et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3797393 | Marchandise et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3801947 | Blewitt et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3810061 | Salzer | May 1974 | A |
3810063 | Blewitt | May 1974 | A |
3839786 | Salzer | Oct 1974 | A |
3849142 | Conwicke | Nov 1974 | A |
3875542 | Holland et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3878423 | Hill et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3913050 | Mikulecky | Oct 1975 | A |
3943009 | Hipp | Mar 1976 | A |
3976967 | Magherini | Aug 1976 | A |
4034329 | Arikawa et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4056884 | Williamson et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4057774 | Arikawa et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4080039 | Ahroni et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4099153 | Cameron | Jul 1978 | A |
4099320 | Schmitdt et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4100523 | Arikawa et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4101860 | Fister | Jul 1978 | A |
4107759 | Shirn et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4122426 | Maruo | Oct 1978 | A |
4161712 | Thiel | Jul 1979 | A |
4178061 | Ahroni | Dec 1979 | A |
4183004 | Kozacka | Jan 1980 | A |
4193106 | Coleman | Mar 1980 | A |
4219793 | Kawamura | Aug 1980 | A |
4224592 | Urani et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4297666 | Asdollahi | Oct 1981 | A |
4329006 | Gale | May 1982 | A |
4375630 | Gaia | Mar 1983 | A |
4398124 | Kohl et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4409729 | Shah | Oct 1983 | A |
4417226 | Asdollahi et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4445106 | Shah | Apr 1984 | A |
4467308 | Arikawa et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4513807 | Rose et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4532489 | Phillips | Jul 1985 | A |
4540969 | Sugar | Sep 1985 | A |
4570104 | Janssen et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4612529 | Gurevich et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4656453 | Reeder | Apr 1987 | A |
4698454 | Moore | Oct 1987 | A |
4703299 | Vermij | Oct 1987 | A |
4713644 | Nash et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4715283 | Yengst | Dec 1987 | A |
4724305 | Iimura et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4751489 | Spaunhorst | Jun 1988 | A |
4760367 | Williams | Jul 1988 | A |
4769902 | Mehta et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4771260 | Gurevich | Sep 1988 | A |
4855705 | Narancic et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
RE33137 | Gurevich et al. | Dec 1989 | E |
4890380 | Narancic et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4918420 | Sexton | Apr 1990 | A |
4920327 | Arikawa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4926153 | Gurevich | May 1990 | A |
4928384 | Gurevich | May 1990 | A |
4963850 | Ranjan et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972170 | Ehlmann et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4996509 | Bernstein | Feb 1991 | A |
5198792 | Bacon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5214406 | Reese et al. | May 1993 | A |
5235307 | Oh | Aug 1993 | A |
5280261 | Mollet | Jan 1994 | A |
5453726 | Montgomery | Sep 1995 | A |
5596306 | Kowalik et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5642090 | Arikawa | Jun 1997 | A |
5663702 | Shaw, Jr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5726620 | Arikawa | Mar 1998 | A |
5739740 | Stark et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760676 | Yamada | Jun 1998 | A |
5770994 | Evans | Jun 1998 | A |
5898358 | Tompkins et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905426 | Douglass | May 1999 | A |
5926084 | Frochte | Jul 1999 | A |
5963123 | Douglass | Oct 1999 | A |
5994994 | Ito et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6133819 | Comberg et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6207938 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6269745 | Cieplik et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6552646 | Wong | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577486 | Nishimiya et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6639188 | Ito | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650223 | Jollenbeck et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6798330 | Arikawa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6856092 | Pothoven et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6917020 | Ito | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7094371 | Lo | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7138899 | Jollenbeck et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7172984 | Zolnier et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7250843 | Richter et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7320171 | Jollenbeck et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20080084267 | Jollenbeck et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
574822 | Jan 1946 | GB |
807755 | Jan 1959 | GB |
1176004 | Jan 1970 | GB |
03062429 | Mar 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090072943 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |