This application relates to a coating system wherein an erosion resistant coating is secured to a housing through a fusible bond layer.
Gas turbine engines are known and, typically, include a fan delivering air into a compressor section. The compressed air is delivered into a combustion section where it is mixed with fuel and ignited. Products of this combustion pass downstream over turbine rotors driving them to rotate.
In modern gas turbine engines, providing a very efficient engine is of increasing importance. Thus, it becomes important to effectively utilize all of the energy produced in the engine. To this end, a compressor section typically includes rotating blades that are spaced from a static housing or case. Sealing surfaces are provided adjacent an outer surface of the blades to provide close clearance between the blade and the housing. This prevents leakage of the air around the blades, which would reduce the efficiency of the engine.
Gas turbine engines, for example for military applications, are being utilized more and more in environments having significant particulates, such as dust and sand. Such an environment raises challenges with regard to maintaining close clearances in the compressor section in that the sand is abrasive. Thus, the coatings provided on the case are being provided by increasingly hard coatings which are resistant to impact from abrasives such as sand. However, challenges arise in that under certain conditions the compressor blade may extend further outwardly than normal and contact this coating. Since the coating is hard, this contact can prove problematic and could result in damage to the blades.
It is also known that a bare base metal may surround the blades, which is of course also hard.
In a featured embodiment, a seal comprises a housing. A coating has at least two layers with a bond layer to be positioned between a housing and a second hard layer. The second hard layer is formed to be harder than the bond layer. The bond layer has a bond strength greater than or equal to 200 psi and less than or equal to 2000 psi.
In another embodiment according to the previous embodiment, the bond strength is a cohesive bond strength.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond strength is between 750 and 1500 psi.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond strength is between 900 and 1250 psi.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the hard layer is formed of a ceramic.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond layer is formed of a ceramic.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond layer is formed of the same ceramic as the hard layer.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the ceramic is an alumina/titania ceramic.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the hard layer is formed of a metal.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the hard layer may be an aluminum silicon alloy.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the hard layer has a thickness greater than or equal to 0.002 inch (0.00502 centimeters) and less than or equal to 0.050 inch (0.127 centimeters).
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, a thickness of the bond layer is between 0.00075 inch (0.001905 centimeters) and less than or equal to 0.00125 inch (0.003175 centimeters).
In another featured embodiment, a gas turbine engine comprises a rotating blade having a radially outer tip. A housing is positioned radially outwardly of the blade. A coating is provided on the housing outwardly of the blade. The coating has at least two layers with a bond layer positioned between the housing and a second hard layer. The second hard layer is formed to be harder than the bond layer. The bond layer has a bond strength greater than or equal to 200 psi and less than or equal to 2000 psi.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond strength is a cohesive bond strength.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond strength is between 750 and 1500 psi.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond strength is between 900 and 1250 psi.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the hard layer has a thickness greater than or equal to 0.002 inch (0.00502 centimeters) and less than or equal to 0.050 inch (0.127 centimeters). A thickness of the bond layer is between 0.00075 inch (0.001905 centimeters) and less than or equal to 0.00125 inch (0.003175 centimeters).
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, a method of forming a coating layer in a gas turbine engine comprises the steps of depositing a first bond layer onto a housing, and depositing a second hard layer on the bond layer. There is a low bond strength between the bond layer and the hard layer. The bond layer has a bond strength greater than or equal to 200 psi and less than or equal to 2000 psi.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, a plasma spray deposit is utilized. The bond layer is deposited with a lower velocity and at a lower temperature than is utilized to deposit the hard layer.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the bond layer and the hard layer are formed of the same material.
These and other features may be best understood from the following drawings and specification.
Referring to
As shown, the seal 104 is positioned within a housing 109. The seal consists of two layers with an outer hard layer 106 and a bond layer 108. The bond layer 108 does not provide a strong cohesive bond to the hard layer 106. Rather, there is a relatively low strength cohesive bond.
The low strength bond may also be seen as a strength in a direction perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the engine.
As mentioned below, the shear strength and compressive strength of the bond layer are well correlated to the cohesive bond strength. The bond strengths mentioned below for the cohesive bond strength would also apply to both compressive and shear strengths.
Although not shown in
Thus, as shown in
As shown in
In this sense, the bond layer 108 provides an effective “fuse” which releases the hard coating preventing damage to the rotor blade 102.
In embodiments, a thickness of the bond layer 108 is smaller than a thickness of the hard layer 106. The hard layer 106 thickness may be greater than or equal to 0.002 inch and less than or equal to 0.050 inch thick. In other applications, the thickness of the bond layer may be on the order of 0.012 inch thick. The thickness of the bond layer 108 should be smaller than the thickness of the hard layer 106. The bond layer may be between 0.00075 inch (0.001905 centimeters) and 0.00125 inch (0.003175 centimeters). In addition, the hard layer has better erosion resistance properties than the bond layer, as it will see sand and other erosion creating impurities.
Notably, the thicknesses are averaged thicknesses as determined in a metallographic cross-section. The coatings have roughnesses that vary significantly across a layer.
The bond layer 108 and the hard layer 106 may be formed of the same material. As an example, a ceramic material may be deposited on the housing 109 to form both layers 108 and 106, with different deposition techniques utilized to achieve the low bond strength of the bond layer 108.
As an example, air plasma spray techniques may be utilized as shown in
In one example, a 3 MB air plasma spray torch from Sulzer Metco having a “G nozzle” and a “2” powder point was utilized. A torch was set up to use nitrogen primary gas and hydrogen secondary gas. The powder for both a bond layer and a hard layer was one available from Sulzer Metco as Sulzer Metco 204NS7YSZ, and was fed to the torch using nitrogen carrier gas.
A part to be coated in this example was arranged on an ID surface of a 20 inch diameter cylindrical fixture, and rotated about a fixture axis while a spray torch traversed back and forth axially relative to the fixture while spraying perpendicularly to the surfaces to be coated.
The fuse or bond layer 108 was formed using relatively low energy plasma spray parameters, and the part surface was controlled to be relatively cool. In one example, the fixture rotated at 160 rpm. Air coolers were positioned to cool the OD of the part and maintain the substrates at a temperature below 300° F. The torch traversed at 24 inches per minute axially to the fixture, and was positioned to spray perpendicularly to the part ID surface at a spray distance of five inches. The torch was operated at 65 scfh of nitrogen and 6 scfh of nitrogen. A power supply amperage was adjusted to achieve a torch power level of 17 kW.
Powder was fed via a powder port at 50 grams/minute with 9 scfh of carrier gas flow rate. These conditions produced particles having an average temperature of about 2900° C. and a velocity of about 70 meters/second at the spray distance as measured with a Technar Accuraspray sensor. The torch traversed across the already bonded coated surface six times to produce a layer thickness of about 0.003. The strength of the layer as measured in tension perpendicular to its surface was about 1200 psi.
Maintaining this porosity of this thin coating is difficult using standard epoxy bonding methods, and these values were measured as part of the coating system after the hard and dense layers have been applied.
The hard or dense layer was formed using relatively high energy plasma spray parameters. The part surface temperature was allowed to reach elevated temperatures. In this example, the substrate temperature was limited to 500° F., however, so that silicon masking materials may be used.
The fixture rotated at 40 rpm. Air coolers were positioned to cool the outer diameter of the parts and maintain the substrate at a temperature below 500° C. Coolers were turned on after a preheat during which the torch passed over the part four times and the spray powder was turned on. Torch parameters were the same for the hard top coat as the bond layer. The torch traversed at six inches per minute axially to the fixture and was positioned to spray perpendicularly to the part inner diameter surface at a spray distance of 3.5 inches. The torch was operated at 120 scfh of nitrogen and 18 scfh of nitrogen. A power supply amperage was adjusted to achieve a torch power level of 46 kW. Powder was fed via a powder port at 50 g/minutes with 11 csfh of carrier gas flow rate. These conditions produced particles that had an average temperature of about 3500° C. and a velocity of about 130 m/s at the spray distance as measured with a Technar Accuraspray sensor. The torch traversed across the bond layer 40 times to produce a thickness of about 0.012 inches. The strength of this layer as measured in tension perpendicular to its surface was about 6000 psi.
The porosity of the bond layer and the hard layer are 4.4 and 5.4 g/cc in density, which equates to about 22 and 5 volume % porosity, respectively. Of course, these are merely examples.
Then, as shown schematically in
A worker of ordinary skill in the metallurgical arts would recognize how to form the layers 108 and 106 of the same material in such that one is hard and the other has a low bond strength.
Particular ceramics which may be utilized include 98/2 (% weight) alumina/titania, and 7% (% weight) yttria stabilized zirconia. In addition, metals such as 88/12 Al/Si, Ni and Co alloys, may be utilized. Further, cermets and other ceramics may be utilized.
The two main characteristics is that there be a low bond strength in the layer 108. The “low” bond strength may be defined as having compressive strength and shear strength of greater than or equal to 200 psi and less than or equal to 2000 psi. More narrowly, the strengths may be between 750 and 1500 psi. Even more narrowly, the shear strength may be between 900 and 1250 psi. In addition, the hard layer 106 has erosion resistance capabilities.
In addition, the thickness of the hard layer 106 is maintained small enough that if breaking away does occur, such as shown in
Although an embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
This application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/037,127 filed May 17, 2016, which is a National Phase Application of International Application No. PCT/US2014/063778 filed Nov. 4, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/913,948, filed Dec. 10, 2013.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. 5148262-0302-0343, awarded by the United States Army. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3545944 | Witherell | Dec 1970 | A |
4194042 | Dates | Mar 1980 | A |
5350599 | Rigney | Sep 1994 | A |
6102656 | Nissley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6203021 | Wolfla | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6860718 | Suzuki | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7435056 | Liston | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7998581 | Yasui | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8061978 | Tholen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8557342 | Wagh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8876470 | Strock | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9103035 | Ganesh | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20030121777 | Sato | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030170119 | Fried | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20060099440 | Sahoo | May 2006 | A1 |
20070218309 | Hajmrle | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080026142 | Vontell | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026160 | Taylor | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090123737 | Yasui et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136740 | Reynolds et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090148278 | Allen | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100226783 | Lipkin | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110045264 | Heutling | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048017 | Margolies et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120063888 | Strock et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120099973 | Strock | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2540868 | Jan 2013 | EP |
9512004 | May 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
E. Alfredo Campo, 2—Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Materials, Editor(s): E. Alfredo Campo, In Plastics Design Library, Selection of Polymeric Materials, William Andrew Publishing, p. 77 (Year: 2008). |
Picas, J.A., Punset, M., Baile, M.T., Martin, E. and Forn, A. (2009), Properties of WC—CoCr Based Coatings Deposited by Different HVOF Thermal Spray Processes. Plasma Processes Polym., 6: S948-S953. (Year: 2009). |
International Search Report from corresponding PCT/US14/63778. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2014/063778 mailed Jun. 23, 2016. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 14879855.6 mailed Oct. 12, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200248577 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61913948 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15037127 | US | |
Child | 16724865 | US |