FUSION POLYPEPTIDES

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20190255167
  • Publication Number
    20190255167
  • Date Filed
    November 02, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Published
    August 22, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to fusion polypeptides comprising (a) a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold which is capable of forming multimers, and (b) a polypeptide antigen; and homo- and hetero-multimers thereof. The invention also provides nucleic acid molecules and vectors encoding the fusion polypeptides and multimers; and methods of using the fusion polypeptides, multimers, nucleic acid molecules and vectors to produce an immunogenic response against the polypeptide antigen.
Description

The present invention relates to fusion polypeptides comprising (a) a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold which is capable of forming multimers, and (b) a polypeptide antigen; and homo- and hetero-multimers thereof.


The invention also provides nucleic acid molecules and vectors encoding the fusion polypeptides and multimers; and methods of using the fusion polypeptides, multimers, nucleic acid molecules and vectors to produce an immunogenic response against the polypeptide antigen.


Modern vaccinology approaches use highly-purified protein antigens which often have limited innate stimulatory activity and so may be poorly immunogenic. To address this, multiple strategies have been developed, including incorporating protein antigens into oil emulsions, formulating with aluminium salts, and addition of, or fusion to, Toll-like receptor agonists [1]. Alternatively, by using DNA or recombinant viral vectors, innate immune stimulation can be achieved by the vector while exploiting the host's translational machinery to provide in vivo expression of the antigen [2].


A separate strategy, which has a good safety profile, involves alteration of the size and multimerisation of the antigen either by attachment of the protein to a self-assembling bacteriophage or by fusion to part of a viral capsid [3, 4, 5] or other similar protein [6]. Such virus-like particles (VLPs), which are typically 20-200 nm in diameter, include commercially-deployed human papilloma virus and hepatitis B vaccines [4] as well as numerous products at earlier stages in development [5, 7]. The varied immunological mechanism(s) behind VLP-induced enhanced immunogenicity include ready access to the lymphatic system, rapid dendritic cell uptake and activation, and arrayed-antigen mediated B-cell receptor cross-linking [4]. In some cases, particle entry into cells mediated by specific host receptors has been demonstrated [8, 9]. VLP immunogenicity is likely a result of a combination of these mechanisms.


A limited number of non-viral antigen multimerisation domains have been described. One such domain, IMX313, is derived from the multimerisation domain of a vertebrate complement C4 binding protein (C4 bp) [2], and extensively re-engineered to minimise cross-reactivity with human C4 bp. Marked improvements in immunogenicity to some antigens have been observed with this strategy [10, 11]. Other related technologies include fusion to ferritin or encapsulin molecules [12] or fusion with the highly-multimerising protein lumazine synthetase [13].


Vaccine development is continuing for a range of bacterial pathogens, including S. aureus, pathogenic Neisseria species [14], M. tuberculosis [15], E. coli [14] and against Apicomplexa (e.g. P. falciparum [10]). Multi-antigen vaccines are under development, and there are presently far more candidate antigens than antigen scaffolding strategies. This is potentially problematic, since prior immunity to a scaffold may inhibit immune responses to the antigen-scaffold combination, as was observed with circumsporozoite protein-hepatitis B surface antigen fusions in human adults [16]. It is at present unclear how many molecules exist biologically which are capable of enhancing immunogenicity when fused to other antigens, what the required biophysical properties are, and whether multimerisation is necessary for the adjuvanting effect. Nevertheless, if such proteins exist, pro-immunogenic domains unrelated both to mammalian proteins and to existing viral-like particle components, including Hepatitis B surface antigen, might have utility in a range of vaccines which are currently being developed.


A range of S. aureus proteins which were previously reported to be capable of multimerising (Dps, QacR, SA1388) have now been tested for pro-immunogenic activity using a DNA vaccination system. None displayed a pro-immunogenic effect in this system. This is surprising given the structural similarities between Dps and ferritin, a self-multimerising molecule which is successful at increasing immunogenicity to some antigens when fused to their C-terminus [12].


One S. aureus protein (SAR1376), however, was found to adopt a pro-immunogenic, multimeric, structure in vivo when produced by a DNA vaccination system. This protein is a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT).


4-Oxalocrotonate tautomerases (4-OTs) are typically 60-80 amino acids in length, placing them among the smallest enzymes known. They have an unusual mechanism of action, involving the proline at residue 1 (after the initiator methionine) and are involved in the catalytic breakdown of polycyclic compounds into tri-carboxylic acid (Krebs') cycle precursors in a variety of bacteria [21]. A range of other enzymatic activities have been described in proteins with 4-OT-like structures [21, 26], but all depend on the initial proline.


SAR1376 was found to be pro-immunogenic in mice when fused to a range of pathogen antigens from S. aureus and from P. falciparum, whether delivered by DNA vaccination, viral vectored vaccines or as protein-in-adjuvant formulations. It is also demonstrated herein by mutagenesis that the adjuvant effect does not depend on enzymatic activity, but is abrogated by mutations unfolding the hexameric structure of the protein.


It is therefore proposed that 4-OT proteins represent a class of pro-immunogenic proteins which can be used as scaffolds and fused to a range of antigens, thus enhancing immune responses against such antigens.


It is an object of the invention, therefore, to provide a fusion polypeptide comprising a polypeptide antigen which is presented on a 4-OT-based polypeptide scaffold. Such fusion polypeptides are capable of forming multimers which can enhance the immunogenicity of the presented antigen.


It is a further object of the invention to provide a nucleic acid molecule, such as a recombinant viral vector, which encodes the fusion polypeptide of the invention, to exploit the host's translational machinery in order to provide in vivo expression of the antigen.


The invention therefore provides a fusion polypeptide, wherein the fusion polypeptide comprises:

    • (a) a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold which is capable of forming multimers; and
    • (b) a polypeptide antigen.


The fusion polypeptide comprises at least two parts.


Part (a) is a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold which is capable of forming multimers.


The scaffold is based on a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT) polypeptide. As used herein, the term “4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold” means that the scaffold is a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT) polypeptide or a variant or derivative thereof.


The function of the scaffold is to present the polypeptide antigen in such a manner that the polypeptide antigen elicits an immunogenic response in a subject into which the fusion polypeptide is administered. The scaffold enhances the immunogenicity of the polypeptide antigen. The scaffold may also be said to have an adjuvanting effect on the polypeptide antigen.


The scaffold is capable of multimerising and of presenting the polypeptide antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response in a subject.


It will be appreciated that the 4-OT polypeptide or a variant or derivative thereof does not have to be enzymatically active in order for it to function as a scaffold.


4-OT-like enzymes are common in bacteria [21]. Using a protein sequence-based search strategy, 2780 discrete family members (with a modal length of 63 amino acids) were found across Eubacteria, with examples in Archaea also. The 2780 sequences were found by using the method described in Example 1.


At least 20% sequence identity was observed in the primary protein sequences between the most diverse members of the family (see FIG. 4), and many members exhibited significantly higher levels of sequence identity.


Furthermore, examination of eleven bacterial crystal structures of 4-OT enzymes showed very similar crystal structures in the family members, despite huge evolutionary distances (see FIG. 4B).


Additionally, conserved motifs, including a highly-conserved initial proline, exist within the primary sequences of 4-OT enzymes from genera known to be pathogenic to man (see FIG. 4C).


The sequences of 26 preferred 4-OT enzymes are given herein as SEQ ID NOs: 1-26.


4-OT enzymes may be tested for by their capability to convert 2-hydroxymuconate to the αβ-unsaturated ketone, 2-oxo-3-hexenedioate. As mentioned above, however, the scaffold polypeptide of the invention does not necessarily have to have such activity; but the presence of such activity may be used to identify 4-OT enzymes from which variants and/or derivatives may be produced.


Taken together, the above information may be used by the skilled artisan to readily identify 4-OT polypeptide and variants and derivatives thereof.


Preferably, the 4-OT polypeptide is from or derived from a bacterium.


More preferably, the 4-OT polypeptide is from or derived from a eubacterium.


Preferably, the 4-OT polypeptide is from of derived from a bacterium of one of the following genera: Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Bartonella, Bordetella, Burkholderia, Campylobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Haemophilus, Helicobacter, Leptospira, Mycobacterium, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Rhodobacter, Salmonella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Thermoanaerobacter, Vibrio and Yersinia.


Preferably, the 4-OT polypeptide is from or derived from one of the following bacteria: Acinetobacter baumannii OIFC021, Bacillus cereus, Bartonella elizabethae Re6043vi, Bordetella sp. FB-8, Burkholderia sp. RPE67, Campylobacter jejuni, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Helicobacter pylori, Leptospira interrogans serovar Djasiman str. LT1649, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus suis, Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus, Vibrio fluvialis, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica.


In some preferred embodiments, the 4-OT polypeptide is from S. aureus.


More preferably, the 4-OT polypeptide comprises or consists of the amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-29 or a variant or derivative thereof.


Most preferably, the 4-OT polypeptide comprises or consists of the amino acid sequence as given in one of SEQ ID NOs: 27-29 or a variant or derivative thereof.


SEQ ID NO: 27 is the wild-type amino acid sequence of the S. aureus 4-OT polypeptide. SEQ ID NO: 28 is the amino acid sequence of the S. aureus 4-OT polypeptide which has a proline→alanine mutation at position 1 (P1A). This mutation disrupts enzymatic activity but does not affect multimerisation. SEQ ID NO: 29 is the amino acid sequence of the S. aureus 4-OT polypeptide which has an arginine→alanine mutation at position 35 (R35A).


In a further embodiment, the invention provides a polypeptide comprising or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28 or 29.


In other embodiments, the 4-OT polypeptide comprises or consists of one of the amino acid sequences as given in SEQ ID NOs: 38-627, or a variant or derivative thereof.


In some preferred embodiments, the 4-OT polypeptide comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 38-127, or a variant or derivative thereof having at least 50% sequence identity thereto, more preferably at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity thereto.


In some preferred embodiments, the 4-OT polypeptide comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 128-627, or a variant or derivative thereof having at least 80% sequence similarity thereto, more preferably at least 90% or 95% sequence similarity thereto.


In some preferred embodiments, the 4-OT polypeptide comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 128-627, or a variant or derivative thereof having at least 80% sequence identity thereto, more preferably at least 90% or 95% sequence identity thereto.


The scaffold of part (a) is a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide. As used herein, this means that the scaffold is a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT) polypeptide or a variant or derivative thereof.


Any variants or derivatives of the 4-OT polypeptide need to retain their ability to multimerise and their ability to present the antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response against the antigen in a subject to whom the fusion polypeptide is administered.


As used herein, the term “variants”, when applied to a polypeptide or amino acid sequence, refers to polypeptides having at least 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 99% amino acid sequence identity to the reference SEQ ID NO.


As used herein, the term “derivatives”, when applied to a polypeptide or amino acid sequence, includes fragments of the reference SEQ ID NO which are at least 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 99% of the length of the reference SEQ ID NO.


As used herein, the term “variants”, when applied to a nucleotide sequence, refers to polynucleotides having at least 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 99% nucleotide sequence identity to the reference SEQ ID NO.


As used herein, the term “derivatives”, when applied to a nucleotide sequence, includes fragments of the reference SEQ ID NO which are at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 99% of the length of the reference SEQ ID NO.


The polypeptide variants and derivatives must still retain the essential properties of the scaffold, e.g. being capable of multimerising and of presenting the bacterial or viral antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response in a subject against that antigen.


Variants and derivatives of the nucleotide sequences must encode polypeptides which retain these essential properties.


The polypeptide variants may comprise one or more amino acid substitutions, deletions or insertions compared to the reference sequence.


Preferably, the polypeptide variants comprise one or more amino acid substitutions compared to the reference sequence, most preferably one or more conservative amino acid substitutions.


As used herein, the term “conservative sequence modifications” is intended to refer to amino acid modifications that do not significantly affect or alter ability of the fusion polypeptide to multimerise and to present the bacterial or viral antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response in a subject against that antigen.


Conservative amino acid substitutions are ones in which the amino acid residue is replaced with an amino acid residue having a similar side chain. Families of amino acid residues having similar side chains have been defined in the art. These families include amino acids with basic side chains (e.g. lysine, arginine, histidine), acidic side chains (e.g. aspartic acid, glutamic acid), uncharged polar side chains (e.g. glycine, asparagine, glutamine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, cysteine, tryptophan), nonpolar side chains (e.g. alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine), beta-branched side chains (e.g. threonine, valine, isoleucine) and aromatic side chains (e.g. tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, histidine). Thus, one or more amino acids of the scaffold polypeptides may be replaced with another amino acid from the same side chain family, and the modified amino acid sequence may be tested to evaluate its ability to multimerise and to present the bacterial or viral antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response in a subject.


In some embodiments, the 4-OT polypeptide-based scaffold comprises 1-20, 1-10 or 1-5 or 1-2 conservative amino acid substitutions compared to a 4-OT polypeptide SEQ ID NO disclosed herein.


Percentage amino acid sequence identities and nucleotide sequence identities may be obtained using the BLAST methods of alignment (Altschul et al. (1997), “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs”, Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402; and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Preferably the standard or default alignment parameters are used.


Standard protein-protein BLAST (blastp) may be used for finding similar sequences in protein databases. Like other BLAST programs, blastp is designed to find local regions of similarity. When sequence similarity spans the whole sequence, blastp will also report a global alignment, which is the preferred result for protein identification purposes. Preferably the standard or default alignment parameters are used. In some instances, the “low complexity filter” may be taken off.


BLAST protein searches may also be performed with the BLASTX program, score=50, wordlength=3. To obtain gapped alignments for comparison purposes, Gapped BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can be utilized as described in Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389. Alternatively, PSI-BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can be used to perform an iterated search that detects distant relationships between molecules (see Altschul et al. (1997) supra). When utilizing BLAST, Gapped BLAST, PSI-BLAST, the default parameters of the respective programs may be used.


With regard to nucleotide sequence comparisons, MEGABLAST, discontiguous-megablast, and blastn may be used to accomplish this goal. Preferably the standard or default alignment parameters are used. MEGABLAST is specifically designed to efficiently find long alignments between very similar sequences. Discontiguous MEGABLAST may be used to find nucleotide sequences which are similar, but not identical, to the nucleic acids of the invention.


The BLAST nucleotide algorithm finds similar sequences by breaking the query into short subsequences called words. The program identifies the exact matches to the query words first (word hits). The BLAST program then extends these word hits in multiple steps to generate the final gapped alignments. In some embodiments, the BLAST nucleotide searches can be performed with the BLASTN program, score=100, wordlength=12.


One of the important parameters governing the sensitivity of BLAST searches is the word size. The most important reason that blastn is more sensitive than MEGABLAST is that it uses a shorter default word size (11). Because of this, blastn is better than


MEGABLAST at finding alignments to related nucleotide sequences from other organisms. The word size is adjustable in blastn and can be reduced from the default value to a minimum of 7 to increase search sensitivity.


A more sensitive search can be achieved by using the newly-introduced discontiguous megablast page (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Web/Newsltr/FallWinter02/blastlab.html). This page uses an algorithm which is similar to that reported by Ma et al. (Bioinformatics. 2002 March; 18(3): 440-5). Rather than requiring exact word matches as seeds for alignment extension, discontiguous megablast uses non-contiguous word within a longer window of template. In coding mode, the third base wobbling is taken into consideration by focusing on finding matches at the first and second codon positions while ignoring the mismatches in the third position. Searching in discontiguous MEGABLAST using the same word size is more sensitive and efficient than standard blastn using the same word size. Parameters unique for discontiguous megablast are: word size: 11 or 12; template: 16, 18, or 21; template type: coding (0), non-coding (1), or both (2).


In some embodiments, the BLASTP 2.5.0+ algorithm may be used (such as that available from the NCBI) using the default parameters.


In other embodiments, a BLAST Global Alignment program may be used (such as that available from the NCBI) using a Needleman-Wunsch alignment of two protein sequences with the gap costs: Existence 11 and Extension 1.


In some embodiments, the NCBI RefSeq database may be queried using BLASTp and delta-BLAST [14] using default parameters. Alignments may be prepared using the NCBI Cobalt multiple alignment engine [35] with default parameters.


Sequences are most preferably aligned pairwise using the Needleman-Wunsch global sequence alignment algorithm (Needleman, Saul B. & Wunsch, Christian D. (1970), “A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins”, Journal of Molecular Biology. 48 (3): 443-53. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4. PMID 5420325) as implemented in the nwalign 0.3.1 python package https://pypi.python.org/pypi/nwalign. Alignments are made with a gap opening penalty of 10 and an extension penalty of 4 using the BLOSUM62 matrix (Henikoff, J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10915-10919 (1992)) obtained from the National Centres for Biotechnology Information. Preferably, for sequence “identity”, at each position in the alignment, a score of 1 is given if the amino acids are identical; zero is assigned in all other positions, including those with gaps. Preferably, for sequence “similarity”, at each position in the alignment, as score of 1 is given if the amino acids in each position are (i) identical, or (ii) come from the same group, where the groups used are: polar positive {Histidine, Lysine, Arginine}; polar negative: {Aspartic acid, Glutamic acid}; polar neutral: {serine, threonine, asparagine, glutamine}; non-polar aliphatic {alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine}; {proline and glycine}. This classification is well accepted by those skilled in the field.


The fusion polypeptide also comprises (b) a polypeptide antigen.


The polypeptide may be a “polypeptide-based” antigen, i.e. the antigen is based on a (poly) amino acid sequence which may or may not be glycosylated.


The polypeptide antigen may, for example, be 1-1000, 1-500, 1-200, 1-100 or 1-70 amino acids in length.


The polypeptide antigen may, for example, be one which is presented on a microbe, parasite or neoplasm, or a variant or derivative thereof.


The polypeptide antigen may, for example, be a viral, bacterial, protozoan, animal, mammalian or human antigen, or a variant or derivative thereof.


In some embodiments, the antigen is from a disease-causing bacteria, disease-causing parasite or disease-causing virus, or a variant or derivative thereof.


For example, the antigen may be from a malaria-causing parasite or an influenza-causing virus.


Preferably, the bacterial or parasite antigen is from or derived from Staphylococcus, pathogenic Neisseria, Mycobacteria, Escherichia or from Apicomplexa (e.g. Plasmodium) or helminths.


More preferably, the bacterial or parasite antigen is from or derived from S. aureus, pathogenic Neisseria species, M. tuberculosis, E. coli or P. falciparum.


The polypeptide antigen may, for example, be an polypeptide selected from the group consisting of ClfA, ClfB, FnBPA, FnBP, SdrC, SdrD, SdrE, SasA, SasB, SasC, SasD, SasX, SasF, SasG/AAp, MntC, IsdA, IsdB, IsdH, FhuD2, EsxA, EsxB, Spa, Coa, vWbp, HIa, HIgA, HIgB, HIgC, LukA, LukB, LukD, LukE, EpiP, Can, Csa1A, Csa1B, Csa1C, Csa1D, CsA2A, Csa3A, Csa3B, CsA3C, Csa3D, Csa3E, Csa3G, Csa3H, Csa31, Csa3J, Csa4A, Csa4B, Csa4c, scn, efb, efbc, or a variant or derivative thereof which maintains the immunogenic potential of the antigen.


In one embodiment, the bacterial antigen is S. aureus BitC, a cell surface lipoprotein [19], with accession number NP_370379.


In another embodiment, the bacterial antigen is the extracellular domain of the S. aureus Clumping factor B precursor [20] (ClfB, with accession YP_001333563).


In another embodiment, the bacterial antigen is the S. aureus alpha toxin or a truncated form thereof (e.g. amino acids 1-75 or tHIa75).


In another embodiment, the bacterial antigen is the P. falciparum protein Pfs25.


Preferably, the polypeptide antigen is not a 4-OT polypeptide, or a variant or derivative thereof.


The fusion polypeptide comprises at least two parts, i.e. the scaffold and the antigen. The scaffold and antigen may be linked in any suitable way.


More preferably, however, the scaffold and antigen are joined in the orientation {N-terminus}-antigen-scaffold-{C-terminus}. Preferably, the C-terminus of the scaffold is unmodified.


In some embodiments, the amino acid sequences of the scaffold and antigen are contiguous (i.e. with no intervening amino acids).


In other embodiments, the scaffold and antigen are joined by a linker molecule.


The linker may, for example, be a peptide linker comprising e.g. 1-20 amino acids, or a non-peptide linker.


If present, the linker should not significantly affect (i.e. significantly reduce) the ability of the fusion polypeptide to elicit protective immunity in a subject (e.g. a human subject).


A short amino acid linker may be placed between the antigen and the scaffold sequences. For example, a linker consisting of 1-20, 1-10, 1-5 or 1-3 amino acids may be used.


Preferred linkers include GSG, SGS and SGSG (SEQ ID NO: 36). Most preferably, the linker is GSG. Examples of non-peptide linkers include —(CH2)n—, wherein n is 1-10.


The fusion polypeptide may comprise a leader sequence. The leader sequence is preferably the human tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) signal sequence.


In some embodiments, the fusion polypeptide may additionally comprise an epitope tag, e.g. the V5 epitope tag (-GKPIPNPLLGLDST-, SEQ ID NO: 37). This may be used to monitor protein expression.


The 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold is capable of forming multimers.


As used herein, the term “capable of forming multimers” means that the scaffold polypeptide is capable of forming n-mers (e.g. dimers, trimers), wherein n=2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16 or 20, or more.


The invention also provides a multimer formed of two or more fusion polypeptides of the invention. The multimer may be a homo-multimer or hetero-multimer. Preferably, the multimer is a homo-multimer, wherein the fusion polypeptides are all the same.


In one preferred embodiment, the fusion polypeptide is capable of forming hexamers, most preferably homo-hexamers.


In a particularly-preferred embodiment, the fusion polypeptide comprises a 4-OT polypeptide which is capable of forming homo-hexamers.


In other embodiments, the multimer is a hetero-multimer, wherein the fusion polypeptides are not all the same.


In particular, the invention provides a hetero-multimer comprising two or more (e.g. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6) different fusion polypeptides of the invention.


For example, the fusion polypeptides in the hetero-multimer may comprise the same polypeptide scaffold but different polypeptide antigens. In this way, immunity against a number of different antigens may be achieved using a single hetero-multimer.


For example, the hetero-multimer may comprise two or more different fusion polypeptides of the invention, wherein the polypeptide antigens are derived from different S. aureus antigens.


The fusion polypeptides of the invention may be produced using recombinant methodology. For example, such techniques are described in “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual” (Fourth Edition), by Michael R. Green and Joseph Sambrook.


Alternatively, the nucleotide sequence encoding the polypeptides may be produced by chemical synthesis. Such a nucleotide sequence may then be ligated into an appropriate vector for host cell transformation or transfection. The polypeptides may then be expressed in such host cells.


For modifications of existing 4-OT genes, CRISPR-based techniques may also be used, such as those described in “CRISPR-Cas: A Laboratory Manual” (2016), edited by Jennifer Doudna (University of California, Berkeley) and Prashant Mali (University of California, San Diego). TALENs-based techniques may also be used.


Alternatively, the polypeptides of the invention may be synthesised using standard chemical peptide synthesis techniques. Solid phase synthesis of peptides in which the C-terminal amino acid of the sequence is attached to an insoluble support followed by sequential addition of the remaining amino acids may, for example, be used.


In a further embodiment, the invention provides a nucleic acid molecule which codes for one or more fusion polypeptides of the invention. Preferably, the nucleic acid molecule encodes two or more, preferably 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 of the fusion polypeptides of the invention.


Preferred nucleotide sequences include those encoding one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 1-29, and nucleotide sequences having at least 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% sequence identity thereto, encoding polypeptides which are capable of multimerising and of presenting the bacterial or viral antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response in a subject.


The nucleic acid molecule may encode two or more different fusion polypeptides of the invention which are capable of forming a hetero-multimer of the invention.


In other preferred embodiments, the nucleotide sequence has or comprises the sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 30-32, or a nucleotide sequence having at least 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% sequence identity thereto, encoding a polypeptide which is capable of multimerising and of presenting the bacterial or viral antigen in order to elicit an immunogenic response in a subject.


As used herein, the terms “nucleic acid sequence”, “nucleic acid molecule” and “polynucleotide” are used interchangeably and do not imply any length restriction. These include DNA (including cDNA) and RNA sequences.


The nucleic acid molecules of the present invention include isolated nucleic acid molecules, i.e. molecules that have been removed from their naturally-occurring environment, recombinant or cloned DNA isolates, and chemically-synthesized analogues or analogues which have been synthesized biologically by heterologous systems.


The nucleic acid molecules of the present invention may be prepared by any means known in the art. For example, large amounts of the polynucleotides may be produced by replication in a suitable host cell. The natural or synthetic DNA fragments coding for a desired fragment may be incorporated into recombinant nucleic acid constructs, typically DNA constructs, capable of introduction into and replication in a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell. Usually the DNA constructs will be suitable for autonomous replication in a unicellular host, such as yeast or bacteria, but may also be intended for introduction to and integration within the genome of a cultured insect, mammalian, plant or other eukaryotic cell lines.


The nucleic acid molecules of the present invention may also be produced by chemical synthesis, e.g. by the phosphoramidite method or the tri-ester method, and may be performed on commercial automated oligonucleotide synthesizers. A double-stranded fragment may be obtained from the single-stranded product of chemical synthesis either by synthesizing the complementary strand and annealing the strand together under appropriate conditions or by adding the complementary strand using DNA polymerase with an appropriate primer sequence.


The original (e.g. wild-type) codons in a nucleic acid molecule may be optimised for expression in a desired cell line, for example, using an online tool such as that available at http://genomes.urv.es/OPTIMIZER/.


In one embodiment of the invention, therefore, the nucleic acid molecule is codon-optimized for expression in a host cell, preferably a human cell.


The invention also provides a vector or plasmid comprising a nucleic acid molecule of the invention. Preferably, the vector is an expression vector.


The vector and/or plasmid may comprise one or more regulatory sequences which are operably linked to the nucleotide sequence which encodes the fusion polypeptide, e.g. one or more enhancer, promoter and/or transcriptional terminator sequences.


Preferably, the promoter is a CMV promoter, most preferably the CMV IE94 promoter.


Preferably, the vector or plasmid includes a nucleotide sequence which encodes a polyA tail.


Examples of such nucleotide sequences include the bovine growth hormone (BGH) polyadenylation sequence.


In a preferred embodiment, the vector or plasmid comprises elements which encode:


(i) a human tPA leader sequence;


(ii) a bacterial or viral antigen;


(iii) a GSG linker;


(iv) a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold which is capable of forming multimers; and


(v) a BGH polyA tail.


In some embodiments, the vector is viral vector, e.g. a poxvirus vector. In other embodiments, the vector is an adenoviral vector or a Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) viral vector. Preferably, the vector is a non-replicating vector.


Non-replicating poxviruses and adenoviruses represent groups of viruses which may be used as vectors for the delivery of genetic material into a target cell. Viral vectors serve as antigen delivery vehicles and also have the power to activate the innate immune system through binding cell surface molecules that recognise viral elements. A recombinant viral vector can be produced that carries a nucleic acid encoding a given antigen. The viral vector can then be used to deliver the nucleic acid to a target cell, where the encoded antigen is produced by the target cell's own molecular machinery. As “non-self”, the produced antigen generates an immune response in the target subject.


Without wishing to be bound by any one particular theory, the inventors believe that antigen delivery using the vectors of the invention stimulates, amongst other responses, a T-cell response in the subject. Thus, the inventors believe that one way in which the present invention produces an immunogenic response is by stimulating T-cell responses and the cell-mediated immunity system. In addition, humoral (antibody) based protection can also be achieved.


The vector of the invention may be a non-replicating poxvirus vector. As used herein, a non-replicating (or replication-deficient) viral vector is a viral vector which lacks the ability to productively replicate following infection of a target cell. Thus, a non-replicating viral vector cannot produce copies of itself following infection of a target cell. Non-replicating viral vectors may therefore advantageously have an improved safety profile as compared to replication-competent viral vectors.


In one embodiment, the non-replicating poxvirus vector is selected from a Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vector, a NYVAC vaccinia virus vector, a canarypox (ALVAC) vector, and a fowlpox (FPV) vector. MVA and NYVAC are both attenuated derivatives of vaccinia virus. Compared to vaccinia virus, MVA lacks approximately 26 of the approximately 200 open reading frames.


In one embodiment, the non-replicating poxvirus vector is an MVA vector.


The vector of the invention may be an adenovirus vector. In one embodiment, the adenovirus vector is a non-replicating adenovirus vector (wherein non-replicating is defined as above). Adenoviruses can be rendered non-replicating by deletion of the E1 or both the E1 and E3 gene regions. Alternatively, an adenovirus may be rendered non-replicating by alteration of the E1 or of the E1 and E3 gene regions such that said gene regions are rendered non-functional. For example, a non-replicating adenovirus may lack a functional E1 region or may lack functional E1 and E3 gene regions. In this way the adenoviruses are rendered replication-incompetent in most mammalian cell lines and do not replicate in immunised mammals. Most preferably, both E1 and E3 gene region deletions are present in the adenovirus, thus allowing a greater size of transgene to be inserted. This is particularly important to allow larger antigens to be expressed, or when multiple antigens are to be expressed in a single vector, or when a large promoter sequence, such as the CMV promoter, is used. Deletion of the E3 as well as the E1 region is particularly favoured for recombinant Ad5 vectors. Optionally, the E4 region can also be engineered.


In one embodiment, the adenovirus vector is selected from a human adenovirus vector, a simian adenovirus vector, a group B adenovirus vector, a group C adenovirus vector, a group E adenovirus vector, an adenovirus 6 vector, a PanAd3 vector, an adenovirus C3 vector, a ChAdY25 vector, an AdC68 vector, and an Ad5 vector.


The viral vector of the invention, as described above, can be used to deliver a single antigen to a target cell. Advantageously, the viral vector of the invention can also be used to deliver multiple (different) antigens, homo-multimers or hetero-multimers to a target cell.


In one embodiment, the vector of the invention further comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding an adjuvant (for example, a cholera toxin, an E. coli lethal toxin, or a flagellin).


The nucleic acid sequence encoding a vector (as described above) may be generated by the use of any technique for manipulating and generating recombinant nucleic acid known in the art. In one aspect, the invention provides a method of making a vector (as described above), comprising providing a nucleic acid, wherein the nucleic acid comprises a nucleic acid molecule encoding a vector of the invention; transfecting a host cell with the nucleic acid molecule; culturing the host cell under conditions suitable for the propagation of the vector; and obtaining the vector from the host cell.


As used herein, “transfecting” may mean any non-viral method of introducing nucleic acid molecules into a cell. The nucleic acid molecule may be any nucleic acid molecule suitable for transfecting a host cell. Thus, in one embodiment, the nucleic acid molecule is a plasmid. The host cell may be any cell in which a vector (i.e. a non-replicating poxvirus vector or an adenovirus vector, as described above) may be grown. As used herein, “culturing the host cell under conditions suitable for the propagation of the vector” means using any cell culture conditions and techniques known in the art which are suitable for the chosen host cell, and which enable the vector to be produced in the host cell. As used herein, “obtaining the vector”, means using any technique known in the art that is suitable for separating the vector from the host cell. Thus, the host cells may be lysed to release the vector. The vector may subsequently be isolated and purified using any suitable method or methods known in the art.


The invention also provides a host cell comprising a nucleic acid molecule, vector or plasmid of the invention.


Preferably, the host cell is a eukaryotic host cell. Examples of eukaryotic host cells include yeast and mammalian cells.


The host cell is preferably a cell in which a vector (e.g. a non-replicating poxvirus vector or an adenovirus vector, as described above) may be grown or propagated. The host cell may be selected from a 293 cell (also known as a HEK, or human embryonic kidney, cell), a CHO cell (Chinese Hamster Ovary), a CCL81.1 cell, a Vero cell, a HELA cell, a Per.C6 cell, a BHK cell (Baby Hamster Kidney), a primary CEF cell (Chicken Embryo Fibroblast), a duck embryo fibroblast cell, or a DF-1 cell.


In other embodiments, the host cell is a human cell (e.g. an isolated human cell).


As used herein, the term “product of the invention” refers to the fusion polypeptides of the invention, multimers of the invention, nucleic acids of the invention and vectors and plasmids of the invention, inter alia.


The invention provides a composition comprising a product of the invention.


In particular, the invention provides a composition comprising one or more fusion polypeptides of the invention, one or more multimers of the invention, one or more nucleic acid molecules of the invention, and/or one or more vectors of the invention, optionally together with one or more pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers, excipients or diluents.


The composition is an immunogenic composition.


Substances suitable for use as pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers are known in the art. Non-limiting examples of pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers include water, saline, and phosphate-buffered saline. In some embodiments, however, the composition is in lyophilized form, in which case it may include a stabilizer, such as bovine serum albumin (BSA). In some embodiments, it may be desirable to formulate the composition with a preservative, such as thiomersal or sodium azide, to facilitate long term storage. Examples of buffering agents include, but are not limited to, sodium succinate (pH 6.5), and phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4).


In addition to a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier, the composition of the invention can be further combined with one or more of a salt, excipient, diluent, adjuvant, immunoregulatory agent and/or antimicrobial compound.


In one embodiment, the products of the invention may contain 5% to 95% of active ingredient (i.e. fusion polypeptide, multimer, nucleic acid, vector), such as at least 10% or 25% of active ingredient, or at least 40% of active ingredient or at least 50%, 55%, 60%, 70% or 75% active ingredient.


The products of the invention may be administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation, and in such amount as will be prophylactically and/or therapeutically effective.


Administration of the products of the invention is generally by conventional routes, e.g. intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or mucosal routes. The administration may be by parenteral administration; for example, a subcutaneous or intramuscular injection.


Accordingly, the products of the invention may be prepared as injectables, either as liquid solutions or suspensions. Solid forms suitable for solution in, or suspension in, liquid prior to injection may alternatively be prepared. The preparation may also be emulsified, or the peptide encapsulated in liposomes or microcapsules. The active ingredients are often mixed with excipients which are pharmaceutically acceptable and compatible with the active ingredient. Suitable excipients are, for example, water, saline, dextrose, glycerol, ethanol, or the like and combinations thereof. In addition, if desired, the products of the invention may also contain minor amounts of auxiliary substances such as wetting or emulsifying agents, and/or pH buffering agents.


Additional formulations which are suitable for other modes of administration include oral formulations or formulations suitable for distribution as aerosols. Oral formulations include such normally employed excipients as, for example, pharmaceutical grades of mannitol, lactose, starch, magnesium stearate, sodium saccharine, cellulose, magnesium carbonate, and the like. These compositions take the form of solutions, suspensions, tablets, pills, capsules, sustained release formulations or powders.


It may be desired to direct the products of the present invention to the respiratory system of a subject. Efficient transmission of a therapeutic/prophylactic composition or medicament to the site of infection in the lungs may be achieved by oral or intra-nasal administration.


Formulations for intranasal administration may be in the form of nasal droplets or a nasal spray. An intranasal formulation may comprise droplets having approximate diameters in the range of 100-5000 μm, such as 500-4000 μm, 1000-3000 μm or 100-1000 μm. Alternatively, in terms of volume, the droplets may be in the range of about 0.001-100 μl, such as 0.1-50 μl or 1.0-25 μl, or such as 0.001-1 μl.


Alternatively, the composition may be an aerosol formulation. The aerosol formulation may take the form of a powder, suspension or solution. The size of aerosol particles is relevant to the delivery capability of an aerosol. Smaller particles may travel further down the respiratory airway towards the alveoli than would larger particles. In one embodiment, the aerosol particles have a diameter distribution to facilitate delivery along the entire length of the bronchi, bronchioles, and alveoli. Alternatively, the particle size distribution may be selected to target a particular section of the respiratory airway, for example the alveoli. In the case of aerosol delivery of the medicament, the particles may have diameters in the approximate range of 0.1-50 μm, preferably 1-25 μm, more preferably 1-5 μm.


Aerosol particles may be for delivery using a nebulizer (e.g. via the mouth) or nasal spray. An aerosol formulation may optionally contain a propellant and/or surfactant.


Preferably, the composition of the invention is a vaccine composition, e.g. suitable for parenteral administration, optionally together with one or more adjuvants.


As used herein, a vaccine is a formulation that, when administered to an animal subject such as a mammal (e.g. a human, bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine, equine, cervine, canine or feline subject; in particular a human subject), stimulates a protective immune response against an infectious disease. The immune response may be a humoral and/or a cell-mediated immune response. Thus, the vaccine may stimulate B cells and/or T cells.


Examples of suitable adjuvants include those which are selected from the group consisting of:

    • metal salts such as aluminium hydroxide or aluminium phosphate,
    • oil in water emulsions,
    • toll like receptors agonist, (such as toll like receptor 2 agonist, toll like receptor 3 agonist, toll like receptor 4 agonist, toll like receptor 7 agonist, toll like receptor 8 agonist and toll like receptor 9 agonist),
    • saponins, for example Quil A and its derivatives such as QS7 and/or QS21,
    • CpG containing oligonucleotides,
    • 3D-MPL,
    • (2-deoxy-6-o-[2-deoxy-2-[(R)-3-dodecanoyloxytetra-decanoylamino]-4-o-phosphono-β-D-glucopyranosy]]-2-[(R)-3-hydroxytetradecanoylamino]-α-D-glucopyranosyldihydrogenphosphate),
    • DP (3S, 9 R)-3-[(R)-dodecanoyloxytetradecanoylamino]-4-oxo-5-aza-9(R)-[(R)-3-hydroxytetradecanoylamino] decan-1, 10-diol, 1,10-bis(dihydrogenophosphate), and
    • MP-Ac DP (3S-,9R)-3-[(R)-dodecanoyloxytetradecanoylamino]-4-oxo-5-aza-9-[(R)-3-hydroxytetradecanoylamino]decand, 10-diol, 1-dihydrogenophosphate 10-(6-aminohexanoate),


      or combinations thereof.


Preferably, the adjuvant is selected from the group comprising:

    • a saponin associated with a metallic salt, such as aluminium hydroxide or aluminium phosphate
    • 3D-MPL, QS21 and a CpG oligonucleotide, for example as an oil in water formulation,
    • saponin in the form of a liposome, for example further comprise a sterol such as QS21 and sterol, and
    • ISCOM.


In some particularly preferred embodiments, the adjuvant comprises a saponin. Saponins are steroid or triterpenoid glycosides, which occur in many plant species. Saponin-based adjuvants act in part by stimulating the entry of antigen-presenting cells into the injection site and enhancing antigen presentation in the local lymph nodes.


Preferably, the adjuvant comprises saponin, cholesterol and a phospholipid, e.g. ISCOM Matrix-M™ (Isconova, Novavax).


In Matrix-M, purified saponin fractions are mixed with synthetic cholesterol and a phospholipid to form stable particles than can be readily formulated with a variety of vaccine antigens. Matrix-M™ induces both a cell-mediated and an antibody mediated immune response.


In some other preferred embodiments, the adjuvant comprises a squalene-oil-in-water nano-emulsion emulsion, e.g. AddaVax™ (InvivoGen).


Squalene is an oil which is more readily metabolized than the paraffin oil used in Freund's adjuvants. Squalene oil-in-water emulsions are known to elicit both cellular (Th1) and humoral (Th2) immune responses. This class of adjuvants is believed to act through recruitment and activation of APC and stimulation of cytokines and chemokines production by macrophages and granulocytes.


The composition may further comprise a surfactant. Examples of suitable surfactants include Tween (such as Tween 20), briji and polyethylene glycol.


Vaccine preparation is generally described in New Trends and Developments in Vaccines, edited by Voller et al., University Park Press, Baltimore, Md., U.S.A., 1978. Encapsulation within liposomes is described, for example, by Fullerton, U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,877.


The amount of the polypeptide, multimer, nucleic acid molecule or vector of the present invention present in each vaccine dose is selected as an amount which induces an immunoprotective response without significant, adverse side effects in typical vaccines. Such amount will vary depending upon which specific immunogen is employed and whether or not the vaccine is adjuvanted. Generally, it is expected that each dose will comprise 1-1000 μg of protein, for example 1-200 μg, such as 10-100 μg, and more particularly 10-40 μg. An optimal amount for a particular vaccine can be ascertained by standard studies involving observation of antibody titres and other responses in subjects. Following an initial vaccination, subjects will preferably receive a boost in about 4 weeks, followed by repeated boosts every six months for as long as a risk of infection exists. The immune response to the products of this invention is enhanced by the use of adjuvant and or an immunostimulant.


The amount of saponin for use in the adjuvants of the present invention may be in the region of 1-1000 μg per dose, generally 1-500 μg per dose, more such as 1-250 μg per dose, and more specifically between 1 to 100 μg per dose (e.g. 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 or 90 μg per dose).


The invention also provides a combined preparation comprising two or more components selected from two or more fusion polypeptides of the invention, two or more multimers of the invention, two or more nucleic acids of the invention, two or more vectors of the invention and two or more compositions of the invention as a combined preparation in a form suitable for simultaneous, separate or sequential use, preferably for use in producing an immunogenic response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.


In yet another aspect, the invention provides an antibody against a fusion polypeptide of the invention.


In yet further embodiments, the invention provides a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention for use in therapy or for use as a medicament.


In a further aspect, the invention provides a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention for use in producing an immunogenic response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.


In a further aspect, the invention provides a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention for use in a method of inducing a T-cell or B-cell response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.


In particular, a non-replicating poxvirus vector of the invention can be used to stimulate a protective immune response via the cell-mediated immune system. In one embodiment, the T-cell is a T-helper cell (Th-cell). In one embodiment, the T-cell is a Th17-cell.


In further embodiments, the invention provides the use of a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention in the manufacture of a medicament for use in producing an immunogenic response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.


In further embodiments, the invention provides the use of a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention in the manufacture of a medicament for use in a method of inducing a T cell or B-cell response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.


The invention also provides a method of producing an immunogenic response to a polypeptide antigen in a subject, the method comprising administering an effective amount of a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention to the subject.


The invention also provides a method of inducing a T-cell or B-cell response to a polypeptide antigen in a subject, method comprising administering an effective amount of a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention to the subject.


A polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention may also be used in similar uses and methods to produce neutralising antibodies in vivo against the polypeptide antigens.


The efficacy of the uses and methods to produce an immunogenic response in a subject may be tested (e.g. by ELISA) by establishing the presence or absence of neutralising antibodies against the polypeptide antigen in the subject's blood.


Also provided is an immunogenic composition comprising two or more fusion polypeptides, two or more nucleic acid molecules or two or more vectors or plasmids as defined herein as a combined preparation in a form suitable for simultaneous, separate or sequential use for stimulating an immune response in a subject against the polypeptide antigen.


Preferably, the fusion polypeptide (or other product of the invention) increases the antibody response in a subject (e.g. mouse or human) against the polypeptide antigen (e.g. as measured by a LIPS assay) compared to the antibody response produced by a control polypeptide which encodes the polypeptide antigen alone (i.e. in the absence of the polypeptide scaffold).


Preferably, the fusion polypeptide (or other product of the invention) increases the number or concentration of IFN-γ producing T-cells in a subject (e.g. as measured by IFN-γ ELISpot assay) compared to the number or concentration of IFN-γ producing T-cells produced by a control polypeptide which encodes the polypeptide antigen alone (i.e. in the absence of the polypeptide scaffold).


The subject is preferably a mammal, e.g. a human, pig, cow or horse, more preferably a human.


As used herein, the term “preventing” includes preventing the initiation of a bacterial or viral infection and/or reducing the severity of intensity of a bacterial or viral infection.


Thus, “preventing” encompasses vaccination.


As used herein, the term “treating” embraces therapeutic and preventative/prophylactic measures (including post-exposure prophylaxis) and includes post-infection therapy and amelioration of a bacterial or viral infection. Each of the above-described methods and uses can comprise the step of administering to a subject an effective amount, such as a therapeutically-effective amount, of a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention.


As used herein, an effective amount is a dosage or amount that is sufficient to achieve a desired biological outcome. As used herein, a therapeutically-effective amount is an amount which is effective, upon single or multiple dose administration to a subject (such as a mammalian subject, in particular a human subject) for treating, preventing, curing, delaying, reducing the severity of, ameliorating at least one symptom of a disorder or recurring disorder, or prolonging the survival of the subject beyond that expected in the absence of such treatment.


Accordingly, the quantity of active ingredient to be administered depends on the subject to be treated, capacity of the subject's immune system to generate a protective immune response, and the degree of protection required. Precise amounts of active ingredient required to be administered may depend on the judgement of the practitioner and may be particular to each subject. Administration to the subject can comprise administering to the subject a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention (i.e. a product of the invention) wherein the product of the invention is sequentially administered multiple times (for example, wherein the composition is administered two, three or four times). Thus, in one embodiment, the subject is administered a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention and is then administered the same product of the invention (or a substantially similar product) again at a different time.


In one embodiment, administration to a subject comprises administering a fusion polypeptide of the invention, a multimer of the invention, a nucleic acid of the invention, a vector of the invention or a composition of the invention to a subject, wherein said product of the invention is administered substantially prior to, simultaneously with, or subsequent to, another immunogenic composition.


The invention also extends to prime-boost regimes. For example, priming and/or boosting may be effected using one or more products of the invention. The products may be administered to a subject sequentially, simultaneously or separately. The first and subsequent products of the invention may be the same or different.


The fusion polypeptides may be in the form of a pharmaceutical composition, preferably a vaccine composition, optionally together with one or more pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers, diluents, excipients and adjuvants.


In one embodiment, the first and second products of the invention are administered as part of a prime-boost administration protocol. Thus, the first product may be administered to a subject as the “prime” and the second product subsequently administered to the same subject as the “boost”.


In one preferred embodiment, the first product is an adenovirus vector of the invention prime (e.g. AdHu5), and the second product is a non-replicating poxvirus vector of the invention boost (e.g. MVA).


In one embodiment, each of the above-described methods further comprises the step of administration to the subject of a product of the invention.


In one embodiment, the polypeptide of the invention is administered separately from the administration of a viral vector of the invention. Preferably the fusion polypeptide and a viral vector are administered sequentially, in any order. Thus, in one embodiment, the viral vector (“V”) and the fusion polypeptide (“P”) may be administered in the order V-P, or in the order P-V.


In certain embodiments, the above-described methods further comprise the administration to the subject of an adjuvant. Adjuvant may be administered with any of the products of the invention.


The products of the invention may be given in a single dose schedule (i.e. the full dose is given at substantially one time). Alternatively, the products of the invention may be given in a multiple-dose schedule.


A multiple-dose schedule is one in which a primary course of treatment (e.g. vaccination) may be with 1-6 separate doses, followed by other doses given at subsequent time intervals required to maintain and or reinforce the immune response, for example (for human subjects), at 1-4 months for a second dose, and if needed, a subsequent dose(s) after a further 1-4 months.


The dosage regimen will be determined, at least in part, by the need of the individual and be dependent upon the judgment of the practitioner (e.g. doctor or veterinarian).


Simultaneous administration means administration at (substantially) the same time.


Sequential administration of two or more products of the invention means that the products are administered at (substantially) different times, one after the other.


For example, sequential administration may encompass administration of two or more products of the invention at different times, wherein the different times are separated by a number of days (for example, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 90, 100, 150 or 200 days).


For example, in one embodiment, the vaccine of the present invention may be administered as part of a ‘prime-boost’ vaccination regime.


In one embodiment, the products of the invention can be administered to a subject such as a mammal (e.g. a human, bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine, equine, cervine, canine or feline subject) in conjunction with (simultaneously or sequentially) one or more immunoregulatory agents selected from, for example, immunoglobulins, antibiotics, interleukins (e.g. IL-2, IL-12), and/or cytokines (e.g. IFN-γ).


In yet further embodiments, the invention provides a process for the production of one or more of fusion polypeptides of the invention, which process comprises expressing one or more nucleic acid molecules coding for one or more of said fusion polypeptides in a suitable host, and recovering the polypeptide product(s).


Preferably, the polypeptide products are recovered as multimers.


Preferably, the host is a human cell.


The disclosure of each reference set forth herein is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1. Crystal structures of four multimerizing domains examined (PDB references are shown beneath each image pair).



FIG. 2. Antibody responses to BitC measured by LIPS after vaccination with different scaffolds fused to the c-terminus of BitC. Panel A) Design of pMono2 DNA vaccination vectors; CMV: CMV IE94 promoter, TPA: human tissue plasminogen activator signal sequence, Antigen: antigen being tested, V5: epitope tag and linker sequence, Scaffold: molecule under test, BGH pA: Bovine growth hormone polyadenylation sequence. Panel B) BitC-specific antibody response after prime-boost immunisations of groups of 4-5 BALB/c mice with 50 μg BitC-scaffold DNA as measured by LIPS assay. Sera were collected 3 weeks post boost. Each symbol represents a single mouse. Dotted line: threshold for background response. *p<0.05.



FIG. 3. SAR1376 scaffold enhances immune responses to BitC and ClfB in BALB/c mice. Antigen specific antibody responses against BitC (panel A) and ClfB (panel C) as measured by LIPS assay, and number of IFN-γ producing T-cells induced by BitC (panel B) and ClfB (panel D) after vaccination with different scaffolds fused to the c-terminus of the antigens. Sera were collected 3 weeks post boost. Each symbol represents a single mouse. Dotted line: threshold for background response. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.



FIG. 4. 4-OT family members. A) Family tree, 2780 discrete family members (modal length of 63 amino acids) were found across Eubacteria. B) Published crystal structures of 4-OT members from diverse genera, including SAR1376, whose positions are indicated in A. C) Cobalt alignment of twenty-four 4-OT like sequences from selected genera which include human pathogens.



FIG. 5. SAR1376 mutant P1A scaffold enhances immune responses to ClfB in BALB/c and CD1 mice. Antigen specific antibody responses against ClfB in BALB/c (panel A) and CD1 (panel C) mice as measured by LIPS assay, and number of IFN-γ producing T-cells induced by ClfB in BALB/c (panel B) and CD1 (panel D) mice after vaccination with mutant scaffolds fused to the c-terminus of the antigen. Sera were collected 3 weeks post boost. Each solid symbol represents a single mouse. Dotted line: threshold for background response. *p<0.05; **p<0.01.



FIG. 6. SAR1376 specific antibodies measured after vaccination with (mutant) scaffold fused to the c-terminus of the antigen. Panel A) antibody response against SAR1376 in BALB/c mice immunised with BitC-SAR1376 fusion protein; Panel B) anti-SAR1376 antibody levels after vaccination of BALB/c mice with ClfB fused to SAR1376, SAR1376-P1A or SAR1376-R35A, Panel C) anti-SAR1376 antibodies in CD1 mice immunised with ClfB-SAR1376 mutant PIA scaffold, as measured by LIPS assay. Each solid symbol represents a single mouse. ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.



FIG. 7. SAR1376 mutant PIA fused to truncated HIa increases (functional) antibody response when expressed in Viral Vectors. Panel A) Anti α-hemolysin antibody levels, Panel B) anti SAR1376 antibody levels after vaccination of BALB/c mice with tHIa75-PIA, tHIa75-No scaffold, or empty vectors (controls) as assessed respectively by ELISA and LIPS assay. Sera were collected pre boost (day 56 post prime), and post boost (day 70 post prime). Panel C) α-Toxin neutralizing activity of the antibodies was assessed in day 70 serum by Neutralisation Assay. Minimum and Maximum level as determined with mAb 8B7 as described in Methods. **p<0.01.



FIG. 8. Fusion of SAR3176-P1A to Pfs25 improves functional activity.



FIG. 8A) Plasmid construct for expression of pfs25-SAR1376 P1A in Pichia pastoris.



FIG. 8B) Antibody response after vaccination of BALB/c mice with Pfs2525 fused to SAR1376-P1A. Sera were collected at day 14, 28 and day 61 post prime and IgG responses measured using a standardised ELISA. Each solid symbol represents a single mouse.



FIG. 8C) Pooled-purified IgG mixed with malaria infected blood was fed to Anopheles stephensi mosquitos through a membrane. Midguts were dissected 9 days post-feed and the number of oocysts per gut were counted. Each solid symbol represents the count from one mosquito. AU=antibody units. *p<0.05.





EXAMPLES

The present invention is further illustrated by the following Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight and degrees are Celsius, unless otherwise stated. It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Thus, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.


Example 1: Methods

Scaffolds Used and their Production


Chosen scaffold sequences were human codon optimised and DNA synthetized (GeneArt, Life Technologies Ltd) (SEQ ID NOs: 38-127). Scaffolds were fused to the C-terminus of the S. aureus antigens in a mammalian expression vector (pMono2) using a restriction enzyme based strategy. Antigens fused were S. aureus BitC, a S. aureus cell surface lipoprotein (accession NP_370379); the extracellular domain of the S. aureus Clumping factor B precursor [20] (ClfB, accession YP_001333563); S. aureus α-hemolysin (accession YP_111574996, amino acids 1-75, designed tHIa75 here); and P. falciparum protein Pfs25 (accession AAN35500) [10]. Sequences for all these were synthesised by Life Technologies Ltd.



S. aureus tHIa75 was ligated into the pMono2 vector from which the construct was subcloned into shuttle vectors and transfected into replication-deficient adenovirus human serotype 5 (AdHu5) and Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) as described elsewhere [29, 30].


The gene coding for Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking antigen, Pfs25, with a 6-his tag (His6-Pfs25) was fused 5′ of the gene coding for SAR1376-PIA and ligated into the pPinka-HC plasmid (FIG. 8A) which puts protein expression under methanol-inducible control and allows secretion of the expression product from Pichia pastoris via the α-mating factor secretion signal. Electrocompetent P. pastoris were transformed with the expression plasmid. Colonies were screened for optimal expression and the highest expressing clone selected for scale up. A one litre shake flask culture of the selected clone was grown under inducing conditions and the supernatant harvested. Supernatant containing the secreted expression product was harvested by centrifugation and the product purified by nickel-chelate affinity chromatography.


Vaccination Experiments


All mouse procedures were conducted in accordance to the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (Project licence 30/2825) and were approved by the University of Oxford Animal Care and Ethical Review Committee. Six to eight week old female BALB/c or CD1 mice from Harlan Laboratories UK were used.


In DNA vaccination experiments, groups of 4-12 mice (BALB/c or CD1) were immunised intramuscularly with 50 μg vector DNA in 50 μl PBS (25 μl/hind leg). Immunisation was repeated 2 weeks later. On day 35, blood samples were taken from all animals under terminal anaesthesia (heart bleeds) for immune assays (IFN-gamma secreting T-cell numbers (ELISpot), and antibody levels by Luciferase ImmunoPrecipitation System (LIPS) assay) [31-32].


For viral vector immunization, groups of 6 mice were immunised intramuscularly with 109 i.u. AdHu5 in 25 μl PBS followed at least 8 weeks later by 107 pfu MVA as prime-boost sequence, a regime we refer to as AM7. Venous blood samples were taken from the tail vein of all animals pre boost and 2 weeks post boost.


For immunization with recombinant proteins, groups of 6 BALB/c mice were immunised intramuscularly with 50 μl aliquots (25 μl/hind leg) of protein-in-Alhydrogel formulations, containing 2.5 μg of either Pfs25-P1A or monomeric Pfs25 twice at 2 week intervals.


Blood was collected from the tail vein on day 14 (2 weeks post prime) and day 28 (2 weeks post boost).


Assessment of Immune Responses Against BitC and ClfB


A Luciferase ImmunoPrecipitation System (LIPS) assay was used to detect specific serum anti-S. aureus BitC and ClfB antibodies as described [32]. Briefly, recombinant BitC and ClfB fusion protein with Renilla luciferase were produced in 293 cells as described [32]. Serially diluted sera were incubated with Renilla luciferase-BitC or ClfB fusion proteins. The mix was added to filter plates loaded with A/G beads (Thermo Fisher). After incubation and subsequent washings, chemiluminescence was measured in a Luminometer (ClarioStar, BMG Labtech) after adding substrate (Renilla luciferase assay system, Promega UK Ltd.). Log transformation was applied to luminescence data prior to statistical analysis. Specific luminescence was generated by subtracting the assay background, which was considered to be the luminescence observed in the absence of any sera. The assay limit of detection was considered to be four standard deviations above the specific luminescence in the control groups.


Anti-Alpha Toxin Immune Responses


The anti-tHIa antibody levels and functional activity (neutralizing activity, NA) of the antibodies in serum were assessed respectively by ELISA and Toxin Neutralisation Assay (TNA) as described by Oscherwitz and Cease [33]. In brief, the ability of antibody to block recombinant alpha toxin (AT) cytotoxicity in vitro was assessed using the Jurkat T cell line (TIB-152, ATCC, Manassas, Va.). Mouse anti-Staphylococcal alpha hemolysin mAb (8B7) (IBT Bioservices #0210-001) was used as standard positive to obtain minimum and maximum levels for neutralisation of AT (H9395, Sigma Biologicals).


Anti-Pfs25 Immune Responses


Antibody levels in serum were assessed by standardised anti-Pfs25 ELISA, as described [10]. A serially-diluted standard reference serum with a known antibody titre was used to determine the antibody titre of individual samples. Total IgG was purified from the pooled serum of the mice immunised with Pfs25-SAR1376-P1A and assessed by functional assay by Standard Membrane Feeding Assay (SMFA). This assay involves feeding malaria infected blood mixed with purified IgG to Anopheles stephensi mosquitos through a membrane [34]. If the IgG has functional activity, it will block development of the malaria sexual stage in the mosquito midgut; and at 9 days post feed there will be a reduction in the number of oocysts observed in the gut compared to a non-functional IgG control.


Statistical Analysis


Data on antibody response and IFNγ-specific spots were statistically analysed for effect of added scaffold by means of an F-test after a log10 transformation and correction for background. Log(number of IFN-γ secreting cells) was used, because of the approximate log-normal distribution of ELISpot counts in the animals (not shown). Specific antibody levels from the LIPS assay were generated by subtracting the assay luminescence background, which was considered to be the luminescence observed in the absence of any sera, from the luminescence observed with serum dilutions added. The assay limit of detection was considered to be four standard deviations above the background. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Dunnett's Multiple Comparison Test. Differences were considered significant when p<0.05. The statistical packages used were R 2.15 (http://www.cran.org), and GraphPad Prism version 5.04 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).


Bioinformatic Identification of 4-OT-Like Proteins.


The NCBI RefSeq database was queried using BLASTp and delta-BLAST [14] using default parameters with the S. aureus 4-OT enzyme (YP_040781.1) as a query. Further searches were performed using distant hits and results pooled, and then filtered using custom R scripts to include hits encoding proteins of 55 to 85 amino acids. Manual curation was performed, and the sequence start of predicted proteins was trimmed to begin with MP, as a proline is present in position 2 of all canonical family members [21], i.e. any amino acids purported to originate from upstream initiator codons were removed. A single sequence was selected per genus; using genus-specific sequences, an alignment was prepared using the NCBI Cobalt multiple-alignment engine [35] with default parameters. Additionally, a tree was constructed using PhyML [36] using default parameters, and visualised using Archeopterix [37] software.


Presentation of Crystal Structures


Crystal structures of proteins of interest were downloaded from the Protein data bank. A single hexameric structure was isolated from each set of crystal data using Pymol v.1.8.2 for Windows. For comparison of multiple 4-OT crystals, structures were aligned using CEAlign (Pymol) using default parameters. Pymol was also used to render images.


Example 2: Selection of Scaffolding Tags

Study of crystal structures within the Protein Data Bank revealed a number of bacterial proteins which form self-multimers of various orders. A subset was selected based on absence of intra- or inter-chain disulphide bonding, absence of transmembrane regions and absence of toxicity and oncogenic activity, with a view to increasing the probability of efficient expression.


In the first instance, a number of self-multimerising proteins were selected from S. aureus, a pathogenic microbe causing disease that is controlled by both T-cell and antibody-mediated mechanisms [17]. FIG. 1 shows the structures of the four proteins which were chosen: Dps-like Peroxide Resistance Protein Dpr, with a structure similar to that of ferritin [12]; QacR, a multidrug binding transcriptional repressor; SA138818, a protein of unknown function annotated as a homologue of E. coli ygbL aldolase class 2-like gene; and SAR1376, a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT). The size of the crystallising unit varied from more than 20 nm (for QacR) to less than 5 nm (for SAR1376) (FIG. 1).


Example 3: Fusion of SAR1376 to S. aureus Antigens Enhances their Immunogenicity in Mice

Expression vectors producing fusions of the four proteins (see Sequences herein) with a series of S. aureus antigens were constructed. The expression cassette was composed of a human tissue plasminogen activator leader sequence, the antigen of interest, an epitope tag (V5) used to monitor protein expression, and the scaffolding domain via a GSG linker (FIG. 2A).


We studied scaffold fusions to two S. aureus antigens: BitC [19], a cell surface lipoprotein (accession NP_370379), and the extracellular domain of the Clumping factor B precursor [20] (ClfB, accession YP_001333563). As comparators, constructs expressing antigen without scaffold were constructed (FIG. 2A). Additionally, in some experiments, the multimerising tag IMX313 [2] fused to the antigen C-terminus was used as a positive control.


Groups of BALB/c mice were immunised intramuscularly with a mammalian expression DNA vector expressing BitC fused to one of the four test scaffolding domains. A priming and boosting immunisation was administered, separated by two weeks (FIG. 2). Measurement of the antibody response against BitC three weeks post-boost indicated that fusion of SAR1376 might increase immunogenicity of BitC relative to the no-scaffold comparator (p=0.16), while the mice vaccinated with the Dps scaffold responded poorly against BitC (FIG. 2B).


We further tested the SAR1376 and QacR scaffolds with both ClfB S. aureus antigen and with BitC, in the same 2-week prime-boost vaccination regimen. Humoral and cellular (IFN-γ ELISpot) responses were measured following the second immunisation. Comparator constructs containing the QacR domain were included in order to assess the specificity of the observed response. The immunogenicity results supported the previous experiment, in which a small increase was observed in antibody responses to BitC but not QacR (FIG. 3A; p=0.06 for BitC-SAR1376 when pooling data from experiments shown in FIGS. 2 and 3). A significantly higher antibody response to ClfB-SAR1376 was observed compared to ClfB without a scaffold (p=0.002, FIG. 3C). The SAR1376 scaffold did not enhance IFN-γ producing T-cell numbers with either of these two antigens (FIGS. 3B and 3D), although the IMX313 tag, used here as a positive control, did increase the T cell responses to BitC (FIG. 3B, p=0.01).


Example 4: The 4-OT Family

4-OT-like enzymes are common in bacteria [21]. Using a protein-based search strategy, 2780 discrete family members (modal length of 63 amino acids) were found across Eubacteria, with examples in Archaea also noted (see Example 1). One example was chosen randomly from the 342 different genera identified. Extensive diversity is observed within the protein family, with only 20% identity in primary protein sequences between diverse members of the family (FIG. 4A). Examination of eleven bacterial crystal structures, however, showed a very similar crystal structures in family members despite huge evolutionary distance (FIG. 4B). Conserved motifs, including a highly conserved initial proline, do exist within the primary sequences from genera known to be pathogenic to man (FIG. 4C).


The crystal structure of SAR1376 reveals a hexamer forming an approximately spherical structure of about 5 nm diameter. It further suggests that the amino terminus of a short linker attached to the N-terminus of SAR1376 is surface accessible. Three such amino termini are present on each side of the sphere. This suggests a model in which fusion of antigens to the N-terminus of SAR1376 generates a small sphere with six antigens displayed outwards (FIG. 1).


Example 5: Inactivated SAR1376 Enzyme Retains the Adjuvant Activity

Since the mechanism of 4-OT catalysis has been heavily investigated, we mutated two critical residues involved in the active site: proline-1 (P1) and arginine-35 (R35), a site corresponding to R39 in other crystallised family members [21]. P1A mutations disrupt enzymatic activity, but leave the protein structure intact, whereas R39A or Q mutations disrupt catalysis and impair protein multimerisation [21]. The immunogenicity of ClfB fused to these variants was compared (FIG. 5). The SAR1376 mutant P1A enhanced both the antibody and T-cell responses to ClfB significantly compared to no scaffold (p=0.021) (FIGS. 5A and 5B). By contrast, the immune response to ClfB with the scaffold containing the R35A mutation [21] was not significantly different from ClfB without a scaffold (FIGS. 5A and 5B). The effect of SAR1376 mutant P1A on the ClfB antibody response was similar in both BALB/c (FIG. 5A) and outbred CD1 mice (FIG. 5C). Enhancement on IFN-γ producing T-cell numbers by P1A was observed in one mouse strain (FIGS. 5B and 5D). Taken together, this suggests that protein multimerisation contributes to the enhanced immunogenicity, but catalytic activity does not.


Example 6: SAR1376 and the PIA Variant are Immunogenic

We next investigated the capacity of SAR1376 fusion proteins to raise a humoral response against SAR1376 itself. Antibody responses against SAR1376 fused to either BitC (FIG. 6A) or ClfB (FIG. 6B) in immunised BALB/c mice were not significantly raised, as compared to the no-scaffold groups. By contrast, immunization with ClfB fusion constructs containing the SAR1376 mutant PIA scaffold raised a significant antibody response to SAR1376 in both BALB/c (FIG. 6B) and CD1 outbred (FIG. 6C) mice whereas the R35A mutation did not (FIG. 6B). In both strains, serological responses against SAR1376 in the absence of SAR1376 immunisation were indistinguishable from the assay background (FIG. 6), suggesting that SAR1376 homologues, if present in colonising murine microbiota, do not generate detectable cross reactivity with SAR1376.


In summary, fusion of two S. aureus antigens to SAR1376-PIA significantly increased antibody responses to the antigens, when expressed from DNA vaccine vectors. The enhancement was observed in two different mouse strains, and was abrogated by a mutation known to disrupt multimerisation of SAR1376. Baseline immune responses against SAR1376 were not detected in the two mouse strains, but SAR1376-P1A variant is itself immunogenic.


Example 7: Viral Vectored Vaccines Expressing SAR1376-PIA Fused to Truncated HIa Increase Immunogenicity

We investigated whether the pro-immunogenic effect of SAR1376 fusion was restricted to DNA vaccination. Because the effect of SAR1376 fusion appeared most marked on antibody induction, we elected to study the S. aureus alpha toxin (AT), a haemolytic multimeric β-pore forming toxin which is a critical virulence factor in S. aureus [22] and is encoded by the H/a gene. AT can be neutralised by antibody [22]. We designed a truncated form of AT, designated tHIa75, comprising amino acids 1-75, the portion of the molecule reported to contain the receptor ADAM10 (A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10) binding domain [23, 24]. Recombinant adenoviral (AdH5) and MVA vectors expressing SAR1376 fused to tHIa75 were constructed. BALB/c mice were vaccinated with AdH5-tHIa75 followed eight weeks later by MVA-tHIa, a prime-boost regime known to be highly immunogenic [2]. Analysis of the immune response against alpha toxin showed that SAR1376 fusion did not increase the immunogenicity of adenovirally expressed proteins (FIG. 7A), but two weeks post MVA boost, a significantly-enhanced antibody response was observed in the tHIa75-PIA group relative to the tHIa75-no scaffold group (FIG. 7A). However, the tHIa75 construct did not induce substantial functional (neutralising) antibody titres (FIG. 7C) in either configuration.


As expected, antibodies against SAR3176 were raised and boosted in tHIa75-PIA vaccinated group animals (FIG. 7B).


Example 8: Fusion of SAR1376-PIA to Pfs25 Recombinant Protein Improves Immunogenicity in BALB/c Mice

We investigated whether the pro-immunogenic effect of SAR1376 fusion extended to recombinant protein antigens by studying the effect SAR1376 fusion on immunogenicity of a P. falciparum protein, Pfs25. Pfs25 is a candidate antigen for a transmission blocking vaccine and antibodies against Pfs25 have been shown in several studies to interfere with sexual reproduction of the parasite in the mosquito vector [25]. Recently, we have reported that heptamerisation of Pfs25 by fusion to IMX313 increased its immunogenicity significantly in pre-clinical studies [10].


Recombinant monomeric Pfs25 and Pfs25-SAR1376-P1A proteins were produced in Pichia pastoris as secreted proteins and purified using a 6-Histidine tag (FIGS. 8A and 8B). Mice were immunised twice with either Pfs25-SAR1376-P1A or monomeric Pfs25 protein-in-Alhydrogel formulations at 2-week intervals.


Little response was seen in mice following vaccination with Pfs25. The antibody levels at all time points were significantly higher in the group that received Pfs25-SAR1376-P1A than the mice receiving monomeric Pfs25, demonstrating that fusion of Pfs25 to SAR1376-P1A significantly improved the immune response (FIG. 8C). The pooled and purified IgG from the Pfs25-SAR1376-P1A immunised mice (day 28) were able to completely block oocyst development in the mosquito midgut in the ex vivo Standard Membrane Feeding Assay (SMFA), demonstrating that antibodies produced by immunisation with this platform were functional (FIG. 8D).


REFERENCES



  • 1 De Gregorio, E., Caproni, E. & Ulmer, J. B. Vaccine adjuvants: mode of action. Front Immunol 4, 214, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00214 (2013).

  • 2 Rollier, C. S., Reyes-Sandoval, A., Cottingham, M. G., Ewer, K. & Hill, A. V. Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: deployment in sight. Curr Opin Immunol 23, 377-382, doi:10.1016/j.coi.2011.03.006 (2011).

  • 3 Tissot, A. C. et al. Versatile virus-like particle carrier for epitope based vaccines. PLoS One 5, e9809, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009809 (2010).

  • 4 Bachmann, M. F. & Jennings, G. T. Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nature reviews. Immunology 10, 787-796, doi:10.1038/nri2868 (2010).

  • 5 Lopez-Sagaseta, J., Malito, E., Rappuoli, R. & Bottomley, M. J. Self-assembling protein nanoparticles in the design of vaccines. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 14, 58-68, doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2015.11.001 (2016).

  • 6 Lee, L. A. & Wang, Q. Adaptations of nanoscale viruses and other protein cages for medical applications. Nanomedicine 2, 137-149, doi:10 1016/j.nano.2006.07.009 (2006).

  • 7 Richardson, C., Bargatze, R. F., Goodwin, R. & Mendelman, P. M. Norovirus virus-like particle vaccines for the prevention of acute gastroenteritis. Expert review of vaccines 12, 155-167, doi:10.1586/erv.12.145 (2013).

  • 8 Da Silva, D. M. et al. Physical interaction of human papillomavirus virus-like particles with immune cells. International Immunology 13, 633-641, doi:10.1093/intimm/13.5.633 (2001).

  • 9 Al-Barwani, F., Young, S. L., Baird, M. A., Larsen, D. S. & Ward, V. K. Mannosylation of virus-like particles enhances internalization by antigen presenting cells. PLoS One 9, e104523, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104523 (2014).

  • 10 Li, Y. et al. Enhancing immunogenicity and transmission-blocking activity of malaria vaccines by fusing Pfs25 to IMX313 multimerization technology. Sci Rep 6, 18848, doi:10.1038/srep18848 (2016).

  • 11 Forbes, E. K. et al. T cell responses induced by adenoviral vectored vaccines can be adjuvanted by fusion of antigen to the oligomerization domain of C4b-binding protein. PLoS One 7, e44943, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044943 (2012).

  • 12 Kanekiyo, M. et al. Rational Design of an Epstein-Barr Virus Vaccine Targeting the Receptor-Binding Site. Cell 162, 1090-1100, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.043 (2015).

  • 13 Jardine, J. et al. Rational HIV immunogen design to target specific germline B cell receptors. Science 340, 711-716, doi:10.1126/science.1234150 (2013).

  • 14 Boratyn, G. M. et al. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biology direct 7, 12, doi:10.1186/1745-6150-7-12 (2012).

  • 15 Kaufmann, S. H. Tuberculosis vaccine development ata divide. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine 20, 294-300, doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000041 (2014).

  • 16 White, M. T. et al. A combined analysis of immunogenicity, antibody kinetics and vaccine efficacy from phase 2 trials of the RTS,S malaria vaccine. BMC medicine 12, 117, doi:10 1186/PREACCEPT-5212460251240508 (2014).

  • 17 Daum, R. S. & Spellberg, B. Progress toward a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 54, 560-567, doi:10.1093/cid/cir828 (2012).

  • 18 Saikatendu, K. S. et al. Structure of a conserved hypothetical protein SA1388 from S. aureus reveals a capped hexameric toroid with two PII domain lids and a dinuclear metal center. BMC structural biology 6, 27, doi:10.1186/1472-6807-6-27 (2006).

  • 19 Dugourd, D., Martin, C., Rioux, C. R., Jacques, M. & Harel, J. Characterization of a periplasmic ATP-binding cassette iron import system of Brachyspira (Serpulina) hyodysenteriae. J Bacteriol 181, 6948-6957 (1999).

  • 20 Ni Eidhin, D. et al. Clumping factor B (ClfB), a new surface-located fibrinogen-binding adhesin of Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular microbiology 30, 245-257 (1998).

  • 21 Whitman, C. P. The 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase family of enzymes: how nature makes new enzymes using a beta-alpha-beta structural motif. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 402, 1-13, doi:10.1016/S0003-9861(02)00052-8 (2002).

  • 22 Sampedro, G. R. et al. Targeting Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin as a novel approach to reduce severity of recurrent skin and soft-tissue infections. J Infect Dis 210, 1012-1018, doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu223 (2014).

  • 23 Inoshima, I. et al. A Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxin subverts the activity of ADAM10 to cause lethal infection in mice. Nat Med 17, 1310-1314, doi:10.1038/nm.2451 (2011).

  • 24 Wilke, G. A. & Bubeck Wardenburg, J. Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin-mediated cellular injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 13473-13478, doi:10.1073/pnas.1001815107 (2010).

  • 25 Kaslow, D. C. et al. A vaccine candidate from the sexual stage of human malaria that contains EGF-like domains. Nature 333, 74-76, doi:10.1038/333074a0 (1988).

  • 26 Huddleston, J. P., Burks, E. A. & Whitman, C. P. Identification and characterization of new family members in the tautomerase superfamily: analysis and implications. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 564, 189-196, doi:10.1016/j.abb.2014.08.019 (2014).

  • 27 4-Oxalocrotonate like proteins: Uniprot query, <http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/?query=family:%224-oxalocrotonate+tautomerase+family %22> (2014).

  • 28 Ewer, K. J. et al. Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: from immunogenicity to impact. Curr Opin Immunol 41, 47-54, doi:10.1016/j.coi.2016.05.014 (2016).

  • 29 Gilbert, S. C. et al. Enhanced CD8 T cell immunogenicity and protective efficacy in a mouse malaria model using a recombinant adenoviral vaccine in heterologous prime-boost immunisation regimes. Vaccine 20, 1039-1045 (2002).

  • 30 Draper, S. J. et al. Effective induction of high-titer antibodies by viral vector vaccines. Nat Med 14, 819-821, doi:10.1038/nm.1850 (2008).

  • 31 Burbelo, P. D., Goldman, R. & Mattson, T. L. A simplified immunoprecipitation method for quantitatively measuring antibody responses in clinical sera samples by using mammalian-produced Renilla luciferase-antigen fusion proteins. BMC biotechnology 5, 22, doi:10.1186/1472-6750-5-22 (2005).

  • 32 van Diemen, P. M. et al. Irradiated wild-type and Spa mutant Staphylococcus aureus induce anti-S. aureus immune responses in mice which do not protect against subsequent intravenous challenge. Pathog Dis 68, 20-26, doi:10.1111/2049-632X.12042 (2013).

  • 33 Oscherwitz, J. & Cease, K. B. Identification and validation of a linear protective neutralizing epitope in the beta-pore domain of alpha toxin. PLoS One 10, e0116882, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116882 (2015).

  • 34 Miura, K. et al. Qualification of standard membrane-feeding assay with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and potential improvements for future assays. PLoS One 8, e57909, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057909 (2013).

  • 35 Papadopoulos, J. S. & Agarwala, R. COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 23, 1073-1079, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm076 (2007).

  • 36 Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic biology 59, 307-321, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 (2010).

  • 37 Creech, C. B., 2nd et al. Vaccination as infection control: a pilot study to determine the impact of Staphylococcus aureus vaccination on nasal carriage. Vaccine 28, 256-260, doi:50264-410X(09)01435-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.088 (2009).













SEQUENCES















SEQ ID NO: 1



Acinetobacter_baumannii_OIFC021 gi444755286



MPFINIQTIEGLLDKDSKAELFKRITDLFVEIEGKGNPAFREHVWIRIDEYPPEQWQLGSLSPTKQMIELMTASK





SEQ ID NO: 2



Bacillus_cereus gi487908138



MPYVTVKMLEGRTEEQKKALAEKVTAAVSETTGAPEENIIVFIEEMSKNHYAVGGKRLSDK





SEQ ID NO: 3


Bartonella_elizabethae_Re6043vi gi395417463


MPYVNIKITNEDVTSEQKRQLIEGATQLLVDVLNKNPRTTVVVIDEVDTDNWGIGGVPVTELRKL





SEQ ID NO: 4



Bordetella_sp._FB-8 gi518780346



MPYIRVEMLEGRSDEQKAKLAQAITNAMVEHAGAKPDSIFVVIEDVKKSNWATGGILMSQRK





SEQ ID NO: 5



Burkholderia_sp._RPE67 gi636800047



MPIVTIQVTREGNTPGANAVTADEKAQLIKGVSELLRDVLNKPLDSTFVVIQEVELENWGWGGLPVPEYRRQKQARD


S





SEQ ID NO: 6



Campylobacter_jejuni gi657884310



MPFVNIRITKENGKPTTEQKQELIAGVTDLLAKVLNKNKSSTVVIIDEIDTDNYGLGGKSITQVRKEKS





SEQ ID NO: 7



Citrobacter_freundii gi489932881



MPHVDIKCFPRDLNEEEKAALATDITEVIIRHLQSKESSVSVALNEVEPDAWQAVWDAEIAPQMTRLIKKPGYSM





SEQ ID NO: 8



Enterobacter_cloacae gi654545569



MPHVDIKCFPRDLNDEQKTALAADIAEVIIRHFNSKDGSVSVALNQVNPEDWKAQVWDTEIGPKLDELIKKPGYSM





SEQ ID NO: 9



Escherachia_coli gi447042883



MPHIDIKCEPRELDEQQKAALAADITDVIIRHLNCKDSSISIALQQIQPESWQAIWDAEIAPQMEALIKKPGYSM





SEQ ID NO: 10



Haemophilus_parainfluenzae gi503830159



MRYVNIKVTGGAEAPTAKQKAELIEGVTHLLQKVLNKNPETTVVVIDEVDMDNWGIGGKTVTSRRSMK





SEQ ID NO: 11



Helicobacter_pylori gi639858229



MPFINIKLVPENGGSTNEQKQQLIEGVSDLMVKVLNKNKASIVVIIDEVDSNNYGLGGESVYHLRQKN





SEQ ID NO: 12



Leptospira_interrogans_serovar_Djasiman_str._LT1649 gi464164388



MPLVQIFVPAGSLSADMKNDMIQKVTDAVVETEGKPVVRRYTWVHINEVPDGGWGMSGKVVTIDAMKKSLEKTE





SEQ ID NO: 13



Mycobacterium_intracellulare gi497639745



MPLVEVTLVQGRAPHQLRTLISELTDAVETALGVSRSAIRVVLREVPDTHWAAGDVTIAERNKSS





SEQ ID NO: 14



Neisseria_meningitidis gi488141741



MPYVNIKVTGGKEAPTAAQKAELIGGVTELLARVLGKNPETTVVVIDEVDTDNWGIGGKSVSERRKEGR





SEQ ID NO: 15



Neisseria_gonorrhoeae gi636860961



MPYVNIKVTGGKEAPTAAQKAELIGGVIELLARVLGKNPETTVVVIDEVDTDNWDIGGKSVSERRKEGR





SEQ ID NO: 16



Pseudomonas_aeruginosa gi501023324



MPYVNIRVTREGVSADQKRQLIEGATDLLLKVLGKPPESTFVVIDEVDPDNWGVAGESVSALRRRQTPRTS





SEQ ID NO: 17



Pseudomonas_putida gi639678172



MPIAQLYILEGRSDEQKESLIREISEAMSRSLDAPIERVRVIITEMPKNHFGIGGEPASKLNR





SEQ ID NO: 18



Pseudomonas_aeruginosa gi489251658



MPLVTVKGIEGVFSTEQKAEIISKITDAMVSVEGEKMRGVTWVVFEEVKSGDWGIGGEPITTEKVRALQNS





SEQ ID NO: 19



Salmonella_enterica gi555267960



MPHVDIKCFPRDLTDEAKLALAADITDVIIRHLQSKESSISVALNHVPPEEWQAVWDTEIAPQMETLIKKPGYTMSK





SEQ ID NO: 20



Staphylococcus_aureus gi447046020



MPIVNVKLLEGRSDEQLKNLVSEVTDAVEKTTGANRQAIHVVIEEMKPNHYGVAGVRKSDQ





SEQ ID NO: 21



Streptococcus_pneumoniae gi642960263



MPEVRIDLFEGRTLEQKKALAKEVTEAVVRNTGAPRSAVHVIINDMPEGTYFPQGEMRTK





SEQ ID NO: 22



Streptococcus_agalactiae gi657924480



MPFVKIDLFEGRSQEQKNELAREVTEVVSRIAKAPKENIHVFINDMPEGTYYPQDELKKK





SEQ ID NO: 23



Streptococcus_suis gi489024563



MPFVRIDLFEGRTEEQKIALAREVTEVVSRNTNAPKEAIHVFINDMPEGTYYPQGEMKRK





SEQ ID NO: 24



Vibrio_fluvialis gi520908977



MPYINVKVTDDGVTKEQKQAIIKGCTQLMVDILNKNPEKTFVVIDEVNTDNWGVGFDQVTELRR





SEQ ID NO: 25



Yersinia_pseudotuberculosis gi501054428



MPYVNIKITREGATAEQKKQLIAGVTQLLVDTLGKNPATTVVVIDEVDTDNWGIGGRSVTDLRQSS





SEQ ID NO: 26



Yersinia_enterocolitica gi644933472



MPYVNIKITREGATAEQKKQLIAGVTQLLVDTLGKNPATTVVVIDEVDTDNWGIGGHSVTELRKSS





SEQ ID NO: 27


SAR1376 (amino acid sequence)


MMPIVNVKLLEGRSDEQLKNLVSEVTDAVEKTTGANRQAIHVVIEEMKPNHYGVAGVRKSDQ





SEQ ID NO: 28


SAR1376 P1A (amino acid sequence, mutation underlined)


MMAIVNVKLLEGRSDEQLKNLVSEVTDAVEKTTGANKAIHVVIEEMKPNHYGVAGVRKSDQ





SEQ ID NO: 29


SAR1376 R35A (amino acid sequence, mutation underlined)


MMPIVNVKLLEGRSDEQLKNLVSEVTDAVEKTTGANAQAIHVVIEEMKPNHYGVAGVRKSDQ





SEQ ID NO: 30


SAR1376


ATGATGCCCATCGTGAACGTGAAGCTGCTGGAAGGCAGAAGCGACGAGCAGCTGAAGAACCTGGTGTCCGA


AGTGACCGACGCCGTGGAAAAGACCACCGGCGCCAACAGACAGGCCATCCACGTCGTGATCGAGGAAATGAAGCCCA


ACCACTACGGCGTGGCCGGCGTGCGGAAAAGCGATCAGTGATGA





SEQ ID NO: 31


SAR1376 P1A (mutation underlined)


ATGATGGCCATCGTGAACGTGAAGCTGCTGGAAGGCAGAAGCGACGAGCAGCTGAAGAACCTGGTGTCCGA


AGTGACCGACGCCGTGGAAAAGACCACCGGCGCCAACAGACAGGCCATCCACGTCGTGATCGAGGAAATGAAGCCCA


ACCACTACGGCGTGGCCGGCGTGCGGAAAAGCGATCAGTGATGA





SEQ ID NO: 32


SAR1376 R35A (mutation underlined)


ATGATGCCCATCGTGAACGTGAAGCTGCTGGAAGGCAGAAGCGACGAGCAGCTGAAGAACCTGGTGTCCGA


AGTGACCGACGCCGTGGAAAAGACCACCGGCGCCAACGCCCAGGCCATCCACGTCGTGATCGAGGAAATGAAGCCCA


ACCACTACGGCGTGGCCGGCGTGCGGAAAAGCGATCAGTGATGA





SEQ ID NO: 33


SA1388


ATGAAGATCGCCGACCTGATGACCCTGCTGGACCACCACGTGCCCTTTAGCACAGCCGAGAGCTGGGACAA


CGTGGGCCTGCTGATTGGCGACGGCGACGTGGAAGTGACCGGCGTGCTGACAGCCCTGGACTGCACACTGGAAGTCG


TGAACGAGGCCATCGAGAAGGGCTACAACACCATCATCAGCCACCACCCCCTGATCTTCAAGGGCGTGACCAGCCTG


AAGGCCAACGGCTACGGCCTGATCATCCGGAAGCTGATCCAGCACGACATCAACCTGATCGCCATGCACACCAACCT


GGACGTGAACCCCTACGGCGTGAACATGATGCTGGCCAAGGCCATGGGCCTGAAGAACATCAGCATCATCAACAACC


AGCAGGACGTGTACTACAAGGTGCAGACCTACATCCCCAAGGATAATGTGGGCCCCTTCAAGGACAAGCTGAGCGAG


AATGGCCTGGCCCAGGAAGGCAACTACGAGTACTGCTTCTTCGAGAGCGAGGGCAGAGGCCAGTTCAAGCCTGTGGG


CGAGGCCAACCCTACCATCGGCCAGATCGACAAGATCGAGGACGTGGACGAAGTGAAGATCGAGTTCATGATCGACG


CCTACCAGAAGTCCAGAGCCGAGCAGCTGATCAAGCAGTACCACCCCTACGAGACACCCGTGTTCGACTTCATCGAG


ATTAAGCAGACCTCCCTGTACGGCCTGGGCGTGATGGCCGAGGTGGACAACCAGATGACTCTGGAAGATTTCGCCGC


CGACATCAAGAGCAAGCTGAACATCCCCTCCGTCAGATTCGTGGGCGAGAGCAACCAGAAGATCAAGCGGATCGCCA


TCATCGGCGGCAGCGGCATCGGCTACGAGTATCAGGCTGTGCAGCAGGGCGCCGACGTGTTCGTGACAGGCGATATC


AAGCACCACGACGCCCTGGACGCCAAGATCCATGGCGTGAACCTGATCGACATCAACCACTACAGCGAGTACGTGAT


GAAGGAAGGCCTGAAAACCCTGCTGATGAACTGGTTCAATATCGAGAAGATTAACATTGATGTGGAAGCCAGCACCA


TCAATACCGACCCCTTCCAGTACATCTGATGATGA





SEQ ID NO: 34


Dps


ATGAGCAACCAGCAGGACGTCGTGAAAGAACTGAATCAGCAGGTGGCCAACTGGACCGTGGCCTACACCAA


GCTGCACAACTTCCATTGGTACGTGAAGGGCCCCAACTTCTTCAGCCTGCACGTGAAGTTCGAGGAACTGTACAACG


AGGCCAGCCAGTACGTGGACGAGCTGGCCGAGAGAATCCTGGCCGTGGGCGGAAATCCTGTGGGCACCCTGACCGAG


TGCCTGGAACAGAGCATTGTGAAAGAGGCCGCCAAGGGCTACAGCGCCGAGCAGATGGTGGAAGAACTGAGCCAGGA


CTTCACCAACATCAGCAAGCAGCTGGAAAACGCCATCGAGATCGCCGGCAACGCTGGCGACGATGTGTCCGAGGACA


TGTTCATCGGCATGCAGACCAGCGTGGACAAGCACAACTGGATGTTCAAGAGCTACCTGAGCTGATGATGA





SEQ ID NO: 35


QacR


ATGAACCTGAAGGACAAGATCCTGGGCGTGGCCAAAGAGCTGTTCATCAAGAACGGCTACAACGCCACCAC


CACCGGCGAGATCGTGAAGCTGAGCGAGAGCAGCAAGGGCAACCTGTACTACCACTTCAAGACCAAAGAGAACCTGT


TCCTGGAAATCCTGAACATCGAGGAATCCAAGTGGCAGGAACAGTGGAAGAAAGAACAGATCAAGTGCAAGACCAAC


CGCGAGAAGTTCTACCTGTACAACGAGCTGAGCCTGACCACCGAGTACTACTACCCCCTGCAGAACGCCATCATCGA


GTTCTGCACAGAGTACTACAAGACCAATAGCATCAACGAGAAGATGAACAAGCTGGAAAACAAGTACATCGACGCCT


ACCACGTGATCTTCAAAGAGGGCAATCTGAACGGCGAGTGGTGCATCAATGACGTGAACGCCGTGTCCAAGATCGCC


GCCAACGCCGTGAATGGCATCGTGACCTTCACCCACGAGCAGAACATCAATGAGCGGATCAAGCTGATGAACAAATT


CAGCCAGATCTTCCTGAACGGCCTGAGCAAGTGATGA








Claims
  • 1. A fusion polypeptide, wherein the fusion polypeptide comprises: (a) a 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (4-OT)-based polypeptide scaffold which is capable of forming multimers; and(b) a polypeptide antigen.
  • 2. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in claim 1, wherein the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold is from or derived from a bacterium of a genera selected from the group consisting of Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Bartonella, Bordetella, Burkholderia, Campylobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Haemophilus, Helicobacter, Leptospira, Mycobacterium, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Rhodobacter, Salmonella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Thermoanaerobacter, Vibrio and Yersinia.
  • 3. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold is from or derived from Staphylococcus aureus.
  • 4. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 38-127, or a variant or derivative thereof having at least 50% sequence identity thereto, more preferably at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or 95% sequence identity thereto, which retains the ability to multimerise and to present the polypeptide antigen.
  • 5. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 128-627, or a variant or derivative thereof having at least 80% sequence similarity thereto, more preferably at least 90% or 95% sequence similarity thereto, which retains the ability to multimerise and to present the polypeptide antigen
  • 6. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 128-627, or a variant or derivative thereof having at least 80% sequence identity thereto, more preferably at least 90% or 95% sequence identity thereto, which retains the ability to multimerise and to present the polypeptide antigen.
  • 7. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence as given in any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-29, or a variant or derivative thereof which retains the ability to multimerise and to present the polypeptide antigen.
  • 8. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in claim 7, wherein the variant of the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold comprises or consists of an amino acid sequence having at least 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 99% amino acid sequence identity to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-29.
  • 9. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in claim 7, wherein the derivative of the 4-OT based polypeptide scaffold comprises or consists of a fragment of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-29 which is at least 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% or 99% of the length of that SEQ ID NO.
  • 10. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polypeptide antigen is one which is presented on a microbe, parasite or neoplasm.
  • 11. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polypeptide antigen is a viral, bacterial, protozoan, animal, mammalian or human antigen.
  • 12. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polypeptide antigen is from a disease-causing bacterium, a disease-causing parasite or a disease-causing virus, preferably from a malaria-causing parasite or an influenza-causing virus.
  • 13. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polypeptide antigen is a bacterial or parasitic antigen which is from or derived from Staphylococcus, pathogenic Neisseria, Mycobacteria, Escherichia or from Apicomplexa (e.g. Plasmodium) or helminths, preferably from or derived from S. aureus, a pathogenic Neisseria species, M. tuberculosis, E. coli or P. falciparum.
  • 14. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polypeptide antigen is selected from the group consisting of ClfA, ClfB, FnBPA, FnBP, SdrC, SdrD, SdrE, SasA, SasB, SasC, SasD, SasX, SasF, SasG/AAp, MntC, IsdA, IsdB, IsdH, FhuD2, EsxA, EsxB, Spa, Coa, vWbp, HIa, HIgA, HIgB, HIgC, LukA, LukB, LukD, LukE, EpiP, Can, Csa1A, Csa1B, Csa1C, Csa1D, CsA2A, Csa3A, Csa3B, CsA3C, Csa3D, Csa3E, Csa3G, Csa3H, Csa31, Csa3J, Csa4A, Csa4B, Csa4c, scn, efb, efbc, or a variant or derivative thereof which maintains the immunogenic capacity of the antigen.
  • 15. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the polypeptide antigen is S. aureus BitC; the extracellular domain of the S. aureus Clumping factor B precursor (ClfB); the S. aureus alpha toxin or a truncated form thereof; or the P. falciparum protein Pfs25.
  • 16. A homo-multimer, wherein the homo-multimer comprises 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16 or 20 fusion polypeptides as defined in any one of claims 1 to 15.
  • 17. A hetero-multimer, wherein the hetero-multimer comprises 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16 or 20 fusion polypeptides as defined in any one of claims 1 to 15.
  • 18. A hetero-multimer as claimed in claim 17, wherein the hetero-multimer comprises 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 different fusion polypeptides as defined in any one of claims 1 to 15.
  • 19. A hetero-multimer as claimed in claim 17 or claim 18, wherein the hetero-multimer comprises the same 4-OT-based polypeptide scaffold but different polypeptide antigens.
  • 20. A nucleic acid molecule encoding a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, preferably wherein the nucleic acid molecule is DNA.
  • 21. A vector or plasmid comprising a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, preferably wherein the vector is an expression vector.
  • 22. A vector as claimed in claim 21, wherein the vector is a viral vector, preferably an Adenoviral vector or a Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) viral vector.
  • 23. A host cell comprising a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20 or a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or claim 22, preferably wherein the host cell is a eukaryotic cell.
  • 24. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, or a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, optionally together with one or more pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers, excipients or diluents.
  • 25. A vaccine composition comprising a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, or a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, optionally together with an adjuvant.
  • 26. A combined preparation comprising two or more components selected from the group consisting of fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, multimers as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, nucleic acid molecules as claimed in claim 20, and vectors or plasmids as claimed in claim 21 or 22, as a combined preparation in a form suitable for simultaneous, separate or sequential use, preferably for use in producing an immunogenic response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.
  • 27. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, or a composition or preparation as claimed in any one of claims 24 to 26, for use in therapy or for use as a medicament.
  • 28. A fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, or a composition or preparation as claimed in any one of claims 24 to 26, for use in producing an immunogenic response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject, preferably for inducing a T-cell or a B-cell response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.
  • 29. Use of a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, or a composition or preparation as claimed in any one of claims 24 to 26, in the preparation of a medicament for producing an immunogenic response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject, preferably for inducing a T-cell or a B-cell response to the polypeptide antigen in a subject.
  • 30. A method of inducing an immunogenic response to a polypeptide antigen in a subject, the method comprising administering an effective amount of a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, or a composition or preparation as claimed in any one of claims 24 to 26, to the subject.
  • 31. A method of inducing an immunogenic response to a polypeptide antigen in a subject, method comprising administering to the subject: (i) an effective priming amount of a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, or a composition or preparation as claimed in any one of claims 24 to 26; and then(ii) an effective boosting amount of a fusion polypeptide as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, a multimer as claimed in any one of claims 16-19, a nucleic acid molecule as claimed in claim 20, a vector or plasmid as claimed in claim 21 or 22, or a composition or preparation as claimed in any one of claims 24 to 26.
  • 32. A method as claimed in claim 31, the method comprising administering to the subject: (i) an effective priming amount of an adenovirus vector as claimed in claim 22 (preferably AdHu5); and then(ii) an effective boosting amount of a non-replicating poxvirus vector as claimed in claim 22 (preferably MVA).
  • 33. A process for the production of one or more of fusion polypeptides as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, which process comprises expressing one or more nucleic acid molecules as claimed in claim 20 in a host cell, and recovering the fusion polypeptide product(s).
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1618536.5 Nov 2016 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB2017/053300 11/2/2017 WO 00