Patent Literature 1 and Patent Literature 2 disclose a fusion splicer, a fusion splicing system, and a method for fusion-splicing an optical fiber.
Patent Literature 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2002-169050
Patent Literature 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2020-20997
A fusion splicer according to the disclosure includes an imaging unit, a discrimination unit, and a splicing unit. The imaging unit images a pair of optical fibers to generate imaging data. The discrimination unit discriminates a type of each of the pair of optical fibers based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data provided from the imaging unit. The discrimination unit has first and second discrimination algorithms for discriminating a type of optical fiber, and adopts a discrimination result by any of the first and second discrimination algorithms. The first discrimination algorithm is predetermined by a method, other than machine learning, based on a correlation between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data of the optical fibers and a type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. The second discrimination algorithm includes a discrimination model for discriminating a type of optical fiber to be spliced based on imaging data of the optical fiber to be spliced. The discrimination model is created by machine learning using sample data indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data of an optical fiber and the type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. The splicing unit fusion-splices the pair of optical fibers to each other under a splicing condition according to a combination of the types of pair of optical fibers based on a discrimination result in the discrimination unit.
A fusion splicing system according to the disclosure includes a plurality of fusion splicers, each of which is the fusion splicer, and a model creation device. The model creation device creates a discrimination model by collecting sample data from the plurality of fusion splicers to perform machine learning, and provides the discrimination model to the plurality of fusion splicers.
A method for fusion-splicing an optical fiber according to the disclosure includes generating imaging data, discriminating, and fusion-splicing. In the generating imaging data, imaging data is generated by imaging a pair of optical fibers. In the discriminating, a type of each of the pair of optical fibers is discriminated based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from imaging data acquired in the generating imaging data. In the discriminating, a discrimination result by any one of first and second discrimination algorithms for discriminating a type of optical fiber is adopted. The first discrimination algorithm is predetermined by a method, other than machine learning, based on a correlation between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from imaging data of an optical fiber and a type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. The second discrimination algorithm includes a discrimination model for discriminating a type of optical fiber to be spliced based on imaging data of the optical fiber to be spliced. The discrimination model is created by machine learning using sample data indicating a correspondence relationship between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from imaging data of an optical fiber and a type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. In the fusion-splicing, the pair of optical fibers are fusion-spliced to each other under a splicing condition according to a combination of the types of pair of optical fibers based on a discrimination result in the discriminating.
There are various types of optical fibers. For example, the types of optical fibers are distinguished by features related to applications and optical characteristics and structural features. As the features related to applications and optical characteristics, there are features such as single mode fiber (SMF), multi mode fiber (MMF), general-purpose single mode fiber, dispersion shifted single mode fiber (DSF), and non-zero dispersion shifted single mode fiber (NZDSF: Non-Zero DSF). As the structural features, there are features such as optical fiber diameter, core diameter, core and cladding material, and radial refractive index distribution. Further, optimum fusion conditions when a pair of optical fibers is fusion-spliced, for example, discharge time, relative position between optical fibers, vary depending on the combination of types of pair of optical fibers. However, the type of optical fiber already laid is unknown in many cases. Therefore, it is important for a fusion splicer to accurately discriminate the combination of the types of pair of optical fibers to be spliced.
For example, in a system described in Patent Literature 2, a discrimination model capable of discriminating the type of optical fiber from luminance distribution data in a radial direction of the optical fiber is created using machine learning. However, even when only the discrimination model by machine learning is used, discrimination accuracy is limited.
According to the disclosure, it is possible to provide a fusion splicer, a fusion splicing system, and a method for fusion-splicing an optical fiber, which can improve optical fiber type discrimination accuracy.
First, embodiments of the disclosure will be listed and described. A fusion splicer according to an embodiment includes an imaging unit, a discrimination unit, and a splicing unit. The imaging unit images a pair of optical fibers and generates imaging data. The discrimination unit discriminates a type of each of a pair of optical fibers based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data provided from the imaging unit. The discrimination unit has first and second discrimination algorithms for discriminating the type of optical fiber, and adopts a discrimination result by any of the first and second discrimination algorithms. The first discrimination algorithm is predetermined by a method, other than machine learning, based on a correlation between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data of the optical fibers and a type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. The second discrimination algorithm includes a discrimination model for discriminating a type of optical fiber to be spliced based on imaging data of the optical fiber to be spliced. The discrimination model is created by machine learning using sample data indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data of the optical fiber and the type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. The splicing unit fusion-splices the pair of optical fibers to each other under a splicing condition according to a combination of the types of pair of optical fibers based on a discrimination result in the discrimination unit.
A fusion splicing system according to an embodiment includes a plurality of fusion splicers, each of which is the fusion splicer, and a model creation device. The model creation device collects sample data from the plurality of fusion splicers, performs machine learning to create a discrimination model, and provides the discrimination model to the plurality of fusion splicers.
A method for fusion-splicing an optical fiber according to an embodiment includes generating imaging data, discriminating, and fusion-splicing. In the generating imaging data, imaging data is generated by imaging a pair of optical fibers. In the discriminating, a type of each of the pair of optical fibers is discriminated based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from imaging data acquired in the generating. In the discriminating, a discrimination result by any one of first and second discrimination algorithms for discriminating a type of optical fiber is adopted. The first discrimination algorithm is predetermined by a method, other than machine learning, based on a correlation between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from imaging data of an optical fiber and a type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. The second discrimination algorithm includes a discrimination model for discriminating a type of optical fiber to be spliced based on imaging data of the optical fiber to be spliced. The discrimination model is created by machine learning using sample data indicating a correspondence relationship between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from imaging data of an optical fiber and a type of optical fiber from which the feature amounts are obtained. In the fusion-splicing, the pair of optical fibers are fusion-spliced to each other under a splicing condition according to a combination of the types of pair of optical fibers based on a discrimination result in the discriminating.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, the types of optical fibers are discriminated using the first and second discrimination algorithms. Of these discrimination algorithms, the first discrimination algorithm is predetermined by a method, other than machine learning, based on a correlation between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data of the optical fibers and the types of optical fibers, and the same discrimination accuracy as before can be expected. The second discrimination algorithm includes a discrimination model created by machine learning using sample data indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of feature amounts and the types of optical fibers. Therefore, high-precision discrimination based on machine learning can be expected for the types of optical fibers that cannot be discriminated or tend to be erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm. Therefore, according to the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, by adopting a discrimination result by any of the first and second discrimination algorithms, the optical fiber type discrimination accuracy may be improved when compared to a conventional case.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, machine learning may be deep learning. In this case, the optical fiber type discrimination accuracy may be further improved.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may adopt a discrimination result by one of the first and second discrimination algorithms when a predetermined feature amount included in the plurality of feature amounts is larger than a threshold value, and may adopt a discrimination result by the other one of the first and second discrimination algorithms when the predetermined feature amount is smaller than the threshold value. For example, by such a method, it is possible to easily select a discrimination result of one of the first and second discrimination algorithms to be adopted. In this case, the threshold value may be a value determined based on a comparison between the discrimination accuracy by the first discrimination algorithm and the discrimination accuracy by the second discrimination algorithm when the predetermined feature amount changes. In this way, the optical fiber type discrimination accuracy may be further improved.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may adopt the discrimination result thereof when the type of each of the optical fibers can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm, and may adopt the discrimination result by the second discrimination algorithm when the type of each of the optical fibers cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm. For example, by such a method, it is possible to improve the optical fiber type discrimination accuracy. Further, in this case, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may first execute the first discrimination algorithm, and then execute the second discrimination algorithm when the type of each of the optical fibers cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm. As a result, the amount of calculation (the discriminating) of the discrimination unit may be reduced. Alternatively, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may execute the first discrimination algorithm and the second discrimination algorithm in parallel. As a result, it is possible to shorten a time required to obtain a final discrimination result.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, the imaging unit (the generating imaging data) may image the pair of optical fibers at least two times to generate imaging data for at least two times. Then, when the variation of a predetermined feature amount between at least two feature amount groups consisting of the plurality of feature amounts obtained from at least two imaging data is larger than a threshold value, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may adopt a discrimination result obtained by one of the first and second discrimination algorithms, and when the variation of the predetermined feature amount is smaller than the threshold value, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may adopt a discrimination result obtained by any one of the first and second discrimination algorithms. As a result, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the type of optical fibers.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, the imaging unit (the generating imaging data) may image the pair of optical fibers at least two times to generate imaging data for at least two times. Then, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may execute the first and second discrimination algorithms based on at least two feature amount groups consisting of the plurality of feature amounts obtained from at least two imaging data. Among at least two discrimination results obtained by the first discrimination algorithm and at least two discrimination results obtained by the second discrimination algorithm, the discrimination unit (the discriminating) may adopt the at least two discrimination results with smaller variation of discrimination results. As a result, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the type of optical fibers.
In the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the fusion-splicing method, imaging positions of at least two times of imaging data in an optical axis direction of the pair of optical fibers may be identical to each other or different from each other.
In the fusion splicing system, the model creation device may classify the plurality of fusion splicers into two or more groups presumed to have similar tendencies of imaging data to create the discrimination model for each group. The second discrimination algorithm of the discrimination unit of each of the fusion splicers may obtain the discrimination model corresponding to the group to which each of the fusion splicers belongs from the model creation device. As a result, the machine learning can be performed only within a group in which the tendencies of the imaging data are similar, for example, within a group in which the mechanical and structural variations of the fusion splicers are small, or within a group in which the mechanical and structural variations of the imaging units are small. Therefore, it is possible to further improve the optical fiber type discrimination accuracy by the second discrimination algorithm.
In the fusion splicing system, the sample data used for the machine learning of the model creation device may include both the sample data when a type of each of the pair of optical fibers is allowed to be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm, and the sample data when a type of each of the pair of optical fibers is not allowed to be discriminated and when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm. In this case, it is possible to include the types of optical fibers, which are weak points of the first discrimination algorithm, in machine learning of the model creation device, and to improve overall optical fiber type discrimination accuracy.
In the fusion splicing system, the sample data used for machine learning of the model creation device may include only the sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm, and the discrimination unit of each fusion splicer may perform machine learning using sample data thereof when the type of each of the optical fibers cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the optical fibers is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm to improve the discrimination model. In this case, discrimination accuracy of the second discrimination algorithm may be improved for each fusion splicer for the types of optical fibers that cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm due to mechanical and structural variations of each fusion splicer, for example, mechanical and structural variations of the imaging unit.
In the fusion splicing system, the sample data used for machine learning of the model creation device may include sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm, and sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the optical fibers is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm. The discrimination unit of each fusion splicer may perform machine learning using sample data thereof when the type of each of the optical fibers cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the optical fibers is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm to improve the discrimination model. However, sample data provided to the model creation device is excluded. In this case, it is possible to include the types of optical fibers, which are weak points of the first discrimination algorithm, in machine learning of the model creation device, and to improve the discrimination accuracy of the second discrimination algorithm for each fusion splicer for the types of optical fiber that cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm due to mechanical and structural variations of each fusion splicer, for example, mechanical and structural variations of the imaging unit. Therefore, it is possible to further improve the overall optical fiber type discrimination accuracy.
In the method for fusion-splicing, two or more optical fibers of known types may be imaged to generate imaging data, the types of the two or more optical fibers may be discriminated by the first and second discrimination algorithms based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data. One of the first and second discrimination algorithms with the higher discrimination accuracy may be adopted in the discriminating. As a result, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the type of optical fibers.
Specific examples of the fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the method for fusion-splicing the optical fiber of the disclosure will be described below with reference to the drawings. It should be noted that the invention is not limited to these examples, is indicated by the scope of claims, and is intended to include all modifications within the meaning and scope equivalent to the scope of claims. In the following description, the same elements will be designated by the same reference symbols in the description of the drawings, and duplicate description will be omitted.
The splicing unit 3 has a holder mounting portion on which a pair of optical fiber holders 3a can be mounted, a pair of fiber positioning portions 3b, and a pair of discharge electrodes 3c. Each of the optical fibers to be fused is held and fixed by the optical fiber holders 3a, and each of the optical fiber holders 3a is placed on and fixed to the holder mounting portion. The fiber positioning portions 3b are disposed between the pair of optical fiber holders 3a to position a tip of the optical fiber held in each of the optical fiber holders 3a. The discharge electrodes 3c are electrodes for fusing tips of optical fibers to each other by arc discharge, and are disposed between the pair of fiber positioning portions 3b.
The windshield cover 6 is coupled to the housing 2 to cover the splicing unit 3 so as to be openable and closable. An introduction port 6b for introducing an optical fiber into the splicing unit 3, that is, to each of the optical fiber holders 3a, is formed on each of side faces 6a of the windshield cover 6.
The communication unit 11 is constituted by, for example, a wireless LAN module. The communication unit 11 transmits and receives various data to and from the model creation device 20 via the information communication network 30 such as the Internet. The imaging unit 12 images a pair of optical fibers to be spliced from a radial direction of the optical fibers through the observation optical unit (lens) with the pair of optical fibers facing each other, and generates imaging data. The feature amount extraction unit 13 extracts a plurality of feature amounts for specifying a type of optical fiber from the imaging data obtained from the imaging unit 12. The feature amounts include brightness information in the radial direction of the optical fibers. The brightness information in the radial direction of the optical fibers includes, for example, at least one of the following items: a luminance distribution in the radial direction of the optical fiber; an outer diameter of the optical fiber; an outer diameter of a core; a ratio of the outer diameter of the core to the outer diameter of the optical fiber; a ratio of the area of the core to the area of the cladding of the optical fiber; the total luminance of the optical fiber; positions and the number of variation points of the luminance distribution in a cross section of the optical fiber; a luminance difference between a core portion and a clad portion of the optical fiber; and a width of the core portion having specific luminance or more. In addition, the imaging data used for extracting the feature amounts may include imaging data obtained while discharging the pair of optical fibers to be connected in a state in which the optical fibers face each other. In this case, the feature amounts includes, for example, at least one selected from a light intensity at a specific position and a temporal light intensity variation at the specific position.
The discrimination unit 14 discriminates the type of each of the pair of optical fibers to be spliced based on the plurality of feature amounts provided by the feature amount extraction unit 13. Therefore, the discrimination unit 14 stores and holds a first discrimination algorithm 14a and a second discrimination algorithm 14b for discriminating the type of optical fiber. The first discrimination algorithm 14a is predetermined by a method, other than machine learning, based on a correlation between the plurality of feature amounts and the type of optical fiber. For example, the first discrimination algorithm 14a determines a threshold value of a typical feature amount according to a type of optical fiber empirically or by a test, and discriminates the type of optical fiber based on a magnitude relationship between the feature amount and the threshold value. As an example, in order to discriminate between a single mode fiber and a multimode fiber, the core outer diameter is used as the feature amount. In that case, it is determined to be the single mode fiber when the core outer diameter as a feature amount is smaller than a predetermined threshold value, and it is determined to be the multimode fiber when the core outer diameter is larger than the predetermined threshold value.
The second discrimination algorithm 14b includes a discrimination model Md for discriminating a type of optical fiber to be spliced based on imaging data of the optical fiber to be spliced. The discrimination model Md is created by machine learning by the model creation device 20 using sample data indicating a correspondence relationship between a plurality of feature amounts and the types of optical fibers. The discrimination model Md discriminates the type of each of the pair of optical fibers by inputting the feature amount obtained from the feature amount extraction unit 13. These discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b are stored in, for example, the ROM 10c or the auxiliary storage device 10e. The discrimination unit 14 selects and adopts a discrimination result by any of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b using any of the following systems A, B, C and D.
(System A)
The discrimination unit 14 adopts a discrimination result of the first discrimination algorithm 14a when a risk of erroneous discrimination by the first discrimination algorithm 14a is low, and adopts a discrimination result of the second discrimination algorithm 14b when a risk of erroneous discrimination by the first discrimination algorithm 14a is high. A level of the risk of erroneous discrimination may be determined, for example, by the magnitude of a predetermined feature amount included in a plurality of feature amounts and a threshold value. That is, when the predetermined feature amount included in the plurality of feature amounts is larger than the predetermined threshold value, a discrimination result by one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b is adopted, and when the predetermined feature amount is smaller than the predetermined threshold value, a discrimination result by the other one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b is adopted. In other words, the first discrimination algorithm 14a is adopted when the predetermined feature amount is smaller (or larger) than the predetermined threshold value, and the second discrimination algorithm 14b is adopted when the predetermined feature amount is larger (or smaller) than the predetermined threshold value.
The predetermined threshold value is a value determined based on a comparison between discrimination accuracy by the first discrimination algorithm 14a and discrimination accuracy by the second discrimination algorithm 14b when the predetermined feature amount changes. In other words, the predetermined threshold value is a value of the predetermined feature amount when the height of the discrimination accuracy is reversed between the first discrimination algorithm 14a and the second discrimination algorithm 14b. Therefore, in a range where the predetermined feature amount is smaller than the predetermined threshold value, the discrimination accuracy by the first discrimination algorithm 14a is higher (or lower) than the discrimination accuracy by the second discrimination algorithm 14b. In a range where the predetermined feature amount is larger than the predetermined threshold value, the discrimination accuracy by the second discrimination algorithm 14b is higher (or lower) than the discrimination accuracy by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. Further, the discrimination unit 14 adopts a discrimination result of one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b having the higher discrimination accuracy based on the magnitude relationship between the predetermined feature amount and the predetermined threshold value. Note that the discrimination accuracy of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b changes over time as the fusion splicer 10 is operated. The above-mentioned predetermined threshold value is determined, for example, by sequentially calculating the discrimination accuracies of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b while the fusion splicer 10 is in operation.
(System B)
When the type of each of the pair of optical fibers can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, the discrimination unit 14 adopts the discrimination result. When the type of each of the pair of optical fibers cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, the discrimination unit 14 adopts the discrimination result by the second discrimination algorithm 14b. Here, “the optical fiber type can be discriminated” means that the optical fiber type corresponding to the plurality of feature amounts extracted by the feature amount extraction unit 13 is present in the first discrimination algorithm 14a. “The optical fiber type cannot be discriminated” means that the optical fiber type corresponding to the plurality of feature amounts extracted by the feature amount extraction unit 13 is not present in the first discrimination algorithm 14a. In this system B, the discrimination unit 14 may first execute the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and when the discrimination algorithm 14a cannot discriminate the type of each of the pair of optical fibers, the second discrimination algorithm 14b may be executed. Alternatively, the discrimination unit 14 may execute the first discrimination algorithm 14a and the second discrimination algorithm 14b in parallel.
(System C)
In this system, first, the imaging unit 12 images the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 at least two times to generate imaging data PX and PY for at least two times. The feature amount extraction unit 13 extracts at least two feature amount groups consisting of a plurality of feature amounts from at least two times of imaging data PX and PY. When a variation of predetermined feature amounts between at least two feature amount groups is larger than a threshold value, the discrimination unit 14 adopts a discrimination result obtained by one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b, that is, the algorithm having a smaller decrease in discrimination accuracy due to the variation of the predetermined feature amount. When the variation of the predetermined feature amounts is smaller than the threshold value, the discrimination unit 14 adopts a discrimination result obtained by one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b. The predetermined feature amount is, for example, the outer diameter of the core. In this system, the imaging positions of at least two times of the imaging data PX and PY in the optical axis direction of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 may be identical to each other or different from each other. The imaging data PX and PY having imaging positions different from each other are obtained, for example, by moving the imaging unit 12 in the optical axis direction of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 for each imaging.
(System D)
Also in this system, first, the imaging unit 12 images the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 at least two times to generate imaging data PX and PY for at least two times. The feature amount extraction unit 13 extracts at least two feature amount groups consisting of a plurality of feature amounts from at least two times of imaging data PX and PY. The discrimination unit 14 executes both the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b based on at least two feature amount groups. Among at least two discrimination results obtained by the first discrimination algorithm 14a and at least two discrimination results obtained by the second discrimination algorithm 14b, the discrimination unit 14 adopts the at least two discrimination results with smaller variation of discrimination results. Also in this system, the imaging positions of at least two times of imaging data PX and PY in the optical axis direction of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 may be identical to each other or different from each other.
The discrimination result adopted by the discrimination unit 14 is displayed on the monitor 5. When the type of each of the pair of optical fibers displayed on the monitor 5 is erroneous, a user inputs a correct type via the input device 10d and corrects the discrimination result. In this case, the discrimination unit 14 has made an erroneous discrimination, and this correction is fed back to the discrimination accuracy of each of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b described above. Alternatively, the user may input the type of each of the pair of optical fibers via the input device 10d regardless of the discrimination result by the discrimination unit 14. In that case, the input by the user is preferentially adopted, and the type of each of the pair of optical fibers is specified. Alternatively, by selecting one of manufacturing conditions set in advance for each type of optical fiber, the input may be replaced with input of the corresponding type of optical fiber itself. In this case, correctness of the discrimination result of each of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b is fed back to the discrimination accuracy.
The fusion control unit 15 controls an operation of the splicing unit 3. That is, the fusion control unit 15 receives an operation of a switch by the user and controls arc discharge and a contact operation between the tips of the pair of optical fibers in the splicing unit 3. The contact operation between the tips of the pair of optical fibers includes a positioning process of the optical fibers by the fiber positioning portion 3b, that is, control of a tip position of each optical fiber. The control of the arc discharge includes control of discharge power, a discharge start timing, and a discharge end timing. Various splicing conditions such as the tip position of the optical fiber and the discharge power are preset for each combination of the types of pair of optical fibers, and are stored in, for example, the ROM 10c. The fusion control unit 15 selects a splicing condition according to a combination of the types of pair of optical fibers discriminated by the discrimination unit 14 or input by the user. That is, the splicing unit 3 recognizes the combination of the types of pair of optical fibers based on the discrimination result in the discrimination unit 14 or the input result by the user, and fusion-splices the pair of optical fibers to each other under the splicing conditions according to the combination of the types of pair of optical fibers.
The operation of the splicing unit 3 is as follows. First, as illustrated in
Immediately after the start of the arc discharge, the end faces F1a and F2a are separated from each other. The arc discharge corresponds to preliminary discharge for pre-softening the end faces F1a and F2a before fusion. When the arc discharge is started, the fusion control unit 15 controls the position of the fiber positioning portion 3b to bring the end faces F1a and F2a closer to each other and bring the end faces F1a and F2a into contact with each other. Then, the fusion control unit 15 performs main discharge by continuing the arc discharge. As a result, the end faces F1a and F2a are further softened and fused to each other.
In the present embodiment, the splicing conditions include at least one of the following items: the positions of the end faces F1a and F2a before the start of discharge; an interval between the end faces F1a and F2a before the start of discharge; a preliminary discharge time; a main discharge time; the pushing amount after the end faces F1a and F2a are in contact with each other; the pull-back amount after mutually pushing the respective end faces F1a and F2a; preliminary discharge power; main discharge power; and discharge power at the time of pulling back.
The positions of the respective end faces F1a and F2a before the start of discharge refer to positions of the respective end faces F1a and F2a with respect to a line connecting central axes of a pair of discharge electrodes 3c, that is, discharge central axis, at a state illustrated in
Here,
The communication unit 21 illustrated in
The discrimination model creation unit 22 performs machine learning using the sample data Da provided by the communication unit 21. The discrimination model creation unit 22 creates the discrimination model Md for discriminating the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 based on the imaging data PX and PY. Machine learning is preferably deep learning. As a machine learning technique, it is possible to apply various techniques included in so-called supervised learning such as a neural network and a support vector machine. The discrimination model creation unit 22 continuously performs machine learning using a huge amount of the sample data Da obtained from a large number of fusion splicer 10 in operation, and enhances accuracy of the discrimination model Md. The discrimination model creation unit 22 of the present embodiment classifies the plurality of fusion splicers 10 into two or more groups presumed to have similar tendencies of the imaging data PX and PY. Then, the discrimination model creation unit 22 collects the sample data Da for each group and creates a discrimination model Md for each group. Creating the discrimination model Md for each group means that machine learning is performed using only the sample data Da obtained from a plurality of fusion splicers 10 belonging to a certain group, and the created discrimination model Md is provided only to the fusion splicers 10 belonging to the group.
The two or more groups presumed to have similar tendencies of the imaging data PX and PY are classified based on, for example, an inspection result of the fusion splicer 10, similarity of an inspection condition of the fusion splicer 10, similarity of a manufacturer and a date and time of manufacture of the fusion splicer 10, similarity of a manufacturer and a date and time of manufacture of the imaging unit 12, similarity of environmental conditions at a usage place of the fusion splicer 10, similarity of a deterioration state of the fusion splicer 10, or similarity of a type of optical fiber to be spliced. The similarity of an inspection result of the fusion splicer 10 is, for example, a similarity of luminance distribution in the imaging data PX and PY. The similarity of an inspection condition of the fusion splicer 10 is a similarity of environmental conditions when a reference optical fiber is imaged during inspection of each fusion splicer 10, for example, a similarity of at least one selected from temperature (atmospheric temperature), humidity, and atmospheric pressure when a reference optical fiber is imaged. The similarity of environmental conditions at a usage place of the fusion splicer 10 is, for example, at least one selected from temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure at a usage place of the fusion splicer 10. The similarity of a deterioration state of the fusion splicer 10 is, for example, at least one of the following matters: the number of discharges of the fusion splicer 10; splicing frequency; a degree of contamination on the discharge electrodes 3c; a dimming state of the light source that illuminates the optical fiber from the opposite side from the imaging unit 12; a degree of contamination on a lens; and device diagnosis results.
The discrimination model Md created by collecting sample data Da for each group in this way is transmitted and provided to the fusion splicer 10 belonging to each corresponding group via the communication unit 21. The discrimination algorithm 14b of the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10 obtains the discrimination model Md corresponding to the group to which each fusion splicer 10 belongs from the model creation device 20, and discriminates a type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2.
The sample data Da used for machine learning of the discrimination model creation unit 22 includes both sample data when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and sample data when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. Alternatively, the sample data Da used for machine learning of the discrimination model creation unit 22 may include only the sample data when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. In that case, the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10 performs additional machine learning using sample data thereof when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and improves the discrimination model Md owned by the discrimination unit 14.
The sample data Da used for machine learning of the discrimination model creation unit 22 may include both sample data when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and sample data when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. In that case, the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10 may perform additional machine learning using sample data thereof when the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated or is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a to improve the own discrimination model Md. However, the sample data used in the additional machine learning is not include the sample data Da provided to the model creation device 20. In this case, sample data that cannot be discriminated or that is erroneously discriminated for a certain period or number from shipment of the fusion splicer 10 may be provided to machine learning of the discrimination model creation unit 22. Sample data that cannot be discriminated or that is erroneously discriminated thereafter may be provided to the additional machine learning in the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10.
Next, as an imaging process ST2, the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 is imaged to generate the imaging data PX and PY. Subsequently, as a discrimination process ST3, the type of each of the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 is discriminated based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data PX and PY generated in the imaging process ST2. In this discrimination process ST3, a discrimination result by any of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b for discriminating the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 is adopted. As described above, the first discrimination algorithm 14a is predetermined by a method other than machine learning based on a correlation between the plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data PX and PY of the optical fibers F1 and F2 and the types of optical fibers F1 and F2. Further, the second discrimination algorithm 14b includes the discrimination model Md created in the model creation process ST1. The discrimination model Md corresponds to a group to which the fusion splicer 10 performing the discrimination process ST3 belongs. Subsequently, as the splicing process ST4, the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 are fusion-spliced to each other under a splicing condition according to a combination of types of pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 based on a discrimination result in the discrimination process ST3.
As shown in
Effects obtained by the fusion splicing system 1A, the fusion splicer 10, and the fusion-splicing method of the present embodiment described above will be described. In the present embodiment, the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 are discriminated using the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b. Of these discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b, the first discrimination algorithm 14a is predetermined by a method other than machine learning based on a correlation between a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data of the optical fibers F1 and F2 and the types of optical fibers F1 and F2, and the same discrimination accuracy as before can be expected. Further, the second discrimination algorithm 14b includes a discrimination model Md created by machine learning using sample data Da indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of feature amounts and the types of optical fibers F1 and F2. Therefore, high-precision discrimination based on machine learning can be expected for the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 that cannot be discriminated or tend to be erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. Therefore, according to the present embodiment, by adopting a discrimination result by any of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b, the discrimination accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 may be improved when compared to a conventional case.
As mentioned above, machine learning may be deep learning. In this case, the discrimination accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 may be further improved.
As described above, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may adopt a discrimination result by one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b when a predetermined feature amount included in the plurality of feature amounts is larger than a threshold value, and may adopt a discrimination result by the other one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b when the predetermined feature amount is smaller than the threshold value. For example, by such a method, it is possible to easily select a discrimination result of one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b to be adopted. Further, in this case, the threshold value may be a value determined based on a comparison between the discrimination accuracy by the first discrimination algorithm 14a and the discrimination accuracy by the second discrimination algorithm 14b when the predetermined feature amount changes. In this way, the discrimination accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 may be further improved.
As described above, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may adopt the discrimination result thereof when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and may adopt the discrimination result by the second discrimination algorithm 14b when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. For example, by such a method, it is possible to improve the discriminating accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2. In this case, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may first execute the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and then execute the second discrimination algorithm 14b when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. As a result, the amount of calculation of the discrimination unit 14 (in the discrimination process ST3) may be reduced. Alternatively, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may execute the first discrimination algorithm 14a and the second discrimination algorithm 14b in parallel. As a result, it is possible to shorten a time required to obtain a final discrimination result.
As described above, the imaging unit 12 (the imaging process ST2) may image the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 at least two times and generate imaging data PX and PY for at least two times. And then, when the variation of a predetermined feature amount between at least two feature amount groups consisting of the plurality of feature amounts obtained from at least two imaging data PX and PY is larger than a threshold value, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may adopt a discrimination result obtained by one of the first and second discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b. When the variation of the predetermined feature amount is smaller than the threshold value, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may adopt a discrimination result obtained by one of the first and second discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b. As a result, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the type of optical fibers F1 and F2.
As described above, the imaging unit (the imaging process ST2) may image the pair of optical fibers F1 and F2 at least two times to generate imaging data PX and PY for at least two times. And then, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may execute the first and second discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b based on at least two feature amount groups consisting of the plurality of feature amounts obtained from at least two imaging data PX and PY. Note that, among at least two discrimination results obtained by the first discrimination algorithm 14a and at least two discrimination results obtained by the second discrimination algorithm 14b, the discrimination unit 14 (the discrimination process ST3) may adopt the at least two discrimination results with smaller variation of discrimination results. As a result, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the type of optical fibers F1 and F2.
As described above, the model creation device 20 may create the discrimination model Md for each group by classifying the plurality of fusion splicers 10 into two or more groups presumed to have similar tendencies of the imaging data PX and PY. Then, the second discrimination algorithm 14b of the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10 may obtain the discrimination model Md corresponding to a group to which each fusion splicer 10 belongs from the model creation device 20. As a result, since machine learning can be performed only within a group in which the tendencies of the imaging data PX and PY are similar, for example, a group in which there is little mechanical and structural variation in each fusion splicer 10, or a group in which there is little mechanical and structural variation in the imaging unit 12. Therefore, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 by the discrimination algorithm 14b.
As described above, the sample data Da used for machine learning of the model creation device 20 may include both sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. In this case, it is possible to include the types of optical fibers F1 and F2, which are weak points of the first discrimination algorithm 14a, in machine learning of the model creation device 20, and to improve overall discrimination accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2.
As described above, the sample data Da used for machine learning of the model creation device 20 may include only the sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10 may perform machine learning using sample data thereof when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a to improve the discrimination model Md. In this case, discrimination accuracy of the second discrimination algorithm 14b may be improved for each fusion splicer 10 for the types of optical fibers F1 and F2 that cannot be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a due to mechanical and structural variations of each fusion splicer 10, for example, mechanical and structural variations of the imaging unit 12.
As described above, the sample data Da used for machine learning of the model creation device 20 may include sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 can be discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a, and sample data when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 is erroneously discriminated by the first discrimination algorithm 14a. Then, the discrimination unit 14 of each fusion splicer 10 may perform machine learning using sample data thereof when the type of each of the optical fibers F1 and F2 cannot be discriminated and is erroneously discriminated by the discrimination algorithm 14a to improve the discrimination model Md. However, sample data provided to the model creation device 20 is excluded. In this case, it is possible to include the types of optical fibers F1 and F2, which are weak points of the discrimination algorithm 14a, in machine learning of the model creation device 20. In addition, it is possible to improve the discrimination accuracy of the discrimination algorithm 14b for each fusion splicer 10 for the types of optical fiber F1 and F2 that cannot be discriminated by the discrimination algorithm 14a due to mechanical and structural variations of the imaging unit 12 of each fusion splicer 10. Therefore, it is possible to further improve the overall discrimination accuracy of the types of optical fibers F1 and F2.
As described above, two or more optical fibers of known types may be imaged to generate imaging data PX and PY, the types of the two or more optical fibers may be discriminated by the first and second discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b based on a plurality of feature amounts obtained from the imaging data PX and PY. Then, one of the first and second discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b with the higher discrimination accuracy may be adopted in the discrimination process ST3. As a result, it is possible to further improve the discrimination accuracy of the type of optical fibers F1 and F2.
The fusion splicer, the fusion splicing system, and the method for fusion-splicing the optical fiber according to the present disclosure are not limited to the above-described embodiment, and various other modifications are possible. For example, in the fusion splicer 10 of the embodiment, the case where discrimination cannot be performed by the first discrimination algorithm 14a and the case where a discrimination result by the first discrimination algorithm 14a is likely to be erroneous are illustrated as a criterion for adopting a discrimination result of the second discrimination algorithm 14b. Other criteria may be used as long as the overall discrimination accuracy may be improved.
In the fusion splicer 10 according to the above embodiment, any one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b is used to fusion-splice the pair of optical fibers to each other under the connection conditions corresponding to the combination of the types of the pair of optical fibers, but in addition, any one of the discrimination algorithms 14a and 14b may be used to align the pair of optical fibers after the type of the pair of optical fibers has been discriminated, for example, to recognize the position of the core.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2020/016859 | Apr 2020 | WO | international |
The present disclosure relates to a fusion splicer, a fusion splicing system, and a method for fusion-splicing an optical fiber. This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from International Application No. PCT/JP2020/016859, filed on Apr. 17, 2020, the entire contents of the International Application are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2021/015225 | 4/12/2021 | WO |