The present invention relates to fuzing arrangements, and it relates especially to proximity fuzing arrangements for fuzing warheads carried by missiles.
It is known that proximity fuzes, i.e., fuzes which cause the detonation of a warhead when it is at a predetermined distance away from a target, the distance depending upon the conditions of attack, are substantially more lethal than impact fuzes. It is therefore of advantage to utilise proximity fuzes in missiles, but such fuzes can be caused to trigger prematurely by external causes such as enemy counter measures or naturally occurring phenomena such as rain.
It is an object of this invention to provide a proximity fuzing arrangement in which the abovementioned difficulties are reduced.
According to the invention there is provided a proximity fuzing arrangement comprising means for transmitting radiation and receiving such radiation after reflection from echo sources, means for processing the received radiation so as to derive target signals indicative by their frequency of relative motion between the transmitting and receiving means on the one hand and echo sources on the other hand, a plurality greater than two of signal channels, each responsive to target signals in differing respective frequency bands, and means for comparing the signals of said channels so as to permit the arrangement to distinguish true target signals from spurious signals where the terms “true target signals” and “spurious signals” as hereinafter described. Preferably one of said channels responds to a frequency band which encompasses substantially all target signals produced by rain and the said channel is coupled to a gain control circuit preceding the said channels so as to permit the signals fed to said channels to be reduced in the presence of rain.
In order that the invention may be clearly understood and readily carried into effect, one embodiment thereof will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which: —
Referring now to
Amplified target signals from the amplifier 3 are fed in parallel to a bandpass filter 4, which has a pass band of 30 KHz to 70 KHz, and to a notch filter 5 which has a stop band substantially centred on the centre of pass band of filter 4, i.e. 50 KHz. The notch filter 5 feeds, in parallel, a low bandpass filter 6 which has a pass band from 1 KHz to 30 KHz and a high bandpass filter 7 which has a pass band from 70 KHz to 100 KHz. Each of the filters 4, 6 and 7 feeds a respective one of three detector circuits 8, 9 and 10 and each detector circuit feeds a respective one of three 0.1 millisecond integrating circuits 11, 12 and 13.
The signals passed by filter 4 will contain rain and ECM signals, which will be known as “spurious signals”, and also “true target signals” where “true target signals” are those received by reflection from an intended enemy target.
Output signals S11, S12 and S13 each from respective integrators 11, 12 and 13 are applied in parallel to two comparing circuits 14 and 15; the two comparing circuits comprising summing and differencing circuits and being effective to form the combinations:
If either of circuits 14 or 15 produces a positive output signal from its comparison of weighted positive and negative values, the said output signal is passed via an ‘OR’ gate 16 to the trigger output terminal 17. The output signal is then processed to fire the warhead in accordance with predetermined proximity conditions consistent with the prevailing attack situation. Such processing is known and will not be more fully described herein. In this example a weighting factor of four is applied to noise signals S12, and S13 though any suitable weighting factor could be used.
It will be observed that, in view of the signal comparison which is effected between target signals passed through the three signal channels, the notch filter 5 is used to provide good signal separation (i.e. lack of cross talk) between the various channels.
By means of the comparisons, it is ensured that, in the presence of a target signal, a subtraction of noise from signal plus noise is carried out, in one or other of the circuits 14 or 15. Since ECM is generally presented as broad band noise it appears, if present, on all three signal channels, however, the required target signals are substantially confined to the band of filter 4. The subtraction process therefore provides the target signals substantially free of ECM signals. A reduction in noise also occurs because of the reduction in bandwidth of the signals in the various channels.
The present example of the invention includes a further refinement, namely an automatic gain control signal which is derived from the output of integrator 12 and is fed via an amplifier 18 to the automatic gain control attenuator 2. This expedient permits the sensitivity of the fuze arrangement to be reduced during rain, but only to the extent necessary to prevent premature firing. It has been found that the target signals derived in response to rain fall substantially entirely within the frequency band of the filter 6. Thus, in the presence of signals within the frequency band, the gain of the arrangement is reduced by an amount dependent upon the amplitude of such signals. This does not totally “blind” the missile, even when the gain is reduced by a substantial amount, since the signals to be compared in circuits 14 and 15 have all been equally affected by the reduction in gain.
Previously it has been usual in fuzing arrangements to use an automatic gain control signal derived from noise channels to suppress the gain of the system in the presence of constant ECM in a manner similar to that described above for rain. However, such methods are vulnerable to switched ECM, when the ECM signals are switched off the gain of such a system rises to its normal level and if the ECM signals are then switched on again the automatic gain control may not reduce the gain fast enough to prevent triggering. The arrangement described above, however, involves direct comparison and, not being subject to the delay of the automatic gain control, is able to protect against switched ECM in addition to constant ECM. Further protection against switched ECM may be obtained by arranging that the reference channel integrators 12 and 13 have a short rise time and a longer fall time than the other integrator.
A further modification to the invention is obtained if either or both of the comparators 14 and 15 is replaced by a comparator as shown in
The embodiment of the invention described hereinbefore is a preferred embodiment, but it is not the only practical realisation of the invention. For example, a straightforward approach is to use three comparators, one for each channel, the outputs of which feed a common ‘OR’ gate. In this case, each comparator is balanced—i.e. it has a positive and negative input. The positive input to each comparator is the signal derived from its respective channel, whereas the negative input in each case represents the sum of the signals derived from the other two channels. In this way, each comparator is based off by noise in the other two channels.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
43820 | Sep 1973 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3149333 | Campbell | Sep 1964 | A |
3614781 | Lichtman | Oct 1971 | A |
3719944 | Adrian | Mar 1973 | A |
3802343 | Dahl | Apr 1974 | A |
3821737 | Kalmus | Jun 1974 | A |
3877377 | Rabinow | Apr 1975 | A |
3882495 | Bolger | May 1975 | A |