Physical therapy and rehabilitation are long and difficult processes for patients with compromised limbs or unilateral immobility. Following surgery, amputation patients frequently do not receive adequate healthcare resources to meet their rehabilitation needs. Patients who have had a portion of one of their legs amputated wait, at a minimum, six to eight weeks for a prosthetic limb to be fabricated, and often the time required for the limb to heal and the prosthetic to be fabricated is much longer than that. During this waiting period, the vast majority of patients rely exclusively on wheelchairs for mobility and have limited options for rehabilitative exercise. Similarly, patients with full or partial paralysis of a lower limb, or other conditions that result in a compromised lower limb, may be confined to a wheelchair during recovery and experience only limited rehabilitation or exercise. For weeks, patients are substantially wheelchair-bound and limited to physical therapy sessions for rehabilitation.
This limited mobility of the lower limbs can lead to irreversible physiological breakdowns with severe consequences, such as muscle atrophy, joint contractures, phantom limb syndrome, and acceleration of peripheral artery disease. Additionally, in cases where amputation was required because of a patient's vascular disease, the immobility can accelerate the vascular disease in the remaining, non-amputated limb leading to additional medical treatment. Even where a patient might initially have adequate rehabilitation resources, it is all too common for patients that experience an illness or injury, such as a stroke or amputation, to undergo inpatient rehabilitation for a brief period. Upon returning to their own home, those patients experience a rapid decline because they do not have assistive technology for locomotor training.
Generally, before a prosthetic device can be fabricated, amputation patients are confined to the time and location of their physical therapy sessions for rehabilitation and exercise. Similarly, patients with monoplegia or stroke victims often struggle with limited opportunities for rehabilitation or exercise. While conventional gait training devices assist in guiding the compromised limb of a user through a simulated gait motion, they are not particularly well-suited for use outside of physical therapy sessions or for endurance training because they are cumbersome, prohibitively expensive, and incompatible with common exercise equipment. As a result, amputee or monoplegic patients may find it difficult or impossible to use traditional gait training devices outside of physical therapy sessions or for extended duration endurance training.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the claimed subject matter. This summary is not an extensive overview. It is not intended to either identify key or critical elements or to delineate the scope of the claimed subject matter. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The described apparatuses and methods relate to medical devices and more particularly to gait trainers for those with compromised mobility. The gait trainer attachment described herein, in aspects, gives a patient or user the ability to train with common exercise equipment by providing a leg brace and swing arm that guides the compromised limb through a biomechanically proper walking motion. The swing arm is connected to a frame that is designed to attach to exercise equipment, thus allowing the patient to maintain proper biomechanics when using the exercise equipment. In aspects, the described gait trainer attachment facilitates the biomechanics of a normal gait motion, including the muscle activations in the gait cycle, when exercising. For an amputee patient or a user with an otherwise compromised limb, embodiments of the gait trainer attachment allow the compromised limb to bear weight, encourage activation of muscles in the compromised limb, and allow the patient to exercise in a normal gait pattern with proper biomechanics. This prevents disease processes from accelerating, reduces pain, and strengthens the bones and muscles in the compromised limb. In addition, embodiments of the described gait trainer attachment can be portable and the frame adjustable, allowing patients to exercise using the gait trainer attachment outside of the time and location constraints of physical therapy sessions. In embodiments, the compact design allows the gait training device to be used in a variety of settings including but not limited to, physical therapy, hospitals, clinics, gyms, and the home. The adjustable design allows the gait training device to be used with different types of exercise equipment including, but not limited to, treadmills, ellipticals, and stair steppers. Further, the gait training device can be particularly beneficial when used later in the recovery period or in combination with traditional gait trainers. Traditional gait training devices alone tend not to satisfy the rehabilitative needs of partially recovered patients or users with only partially affected ambulation. A return to normal exercise as quickly as possible can benefit the patient's attitude toward recovery and physical therapy, as well as the strengthening of the muscles and bones of the patient.
In embodiments, the gait trainer attachment includes an adjustable frame that removable attaches to a plurality of exercise equipment, a leg brace configured to hold a compromised limb of a user, and a compromised limb gait system connecting the leg brace to the frame and configured to guide the compromised limb through a simulated gait motion. The compromised limb gait system includes a yoke that connects the leg brace to a swing arm, where the brace is connected to the compromised limb of the user and the swing arm permits movement in substantially a single plane.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the claimed subject matter are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative of various ways in which the subject matter may be practiced, all of which are intended to be within the scope of the claimed subject matter. Other advantages and novel features may become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The apparatuses, devices, and methods may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals indicate like structural elements and features in various figures. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, and simply illustrate the principles of the apparatuses, devices and methods. The accompanying drawings illustrate only possible embodiments of the apparatuses, devices and methods and are therefore not to be considered limiting in scope.
Aspects of the system and methods are described below with reference to illustrative embodiments. The references to illustrative embodiments below are not made to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Instead, illustrative embodiments are used to aid in the description of various aspects of the device. The description, made by way of example and reference to illustrative reference, is not meant to be limiting as regards any aspect of the claimed subject matter.
The described devices relate to medical or therapeutic devices and more particularly to gait training devices for those with compromised mobility. The terms “gait training device” and “gait trainer” are used interchangeably herein. In aspects, the described gait trainer attachment facilitates the biomechanics of a normal gait motion, including the typical muscle activations in the gait cycle. For an amputee patient or a user with an otherwise compromised limb, embodiments of the gait trainer attachment guide the user to maintain proper biomechanics when using common exercise or rehabilitation equipment. All of this allows the patient to put weight on the compromised limb, activate muscles in the compromised limb, and walk or run with a normal gait pattern. This prevents disease processes from accelerating, reduces pain, and further strengthens the bones and muscles in the compromised limb. In addition, embodiments of the described gait trainer attachment can be portable, allowing the patient to exercise outside of the time and location constraints of physical therapy sessions. The compact and adjustable design allows the gait trainer attachment to be used in a variety of settings including, but not limited to, physical therapy, hospitals, clinics, gyms, and the home. Further, the gait trainer attachment can be particularly beneficial when used later in the recovery period where patients tend to exhibit more advanced ambulatory ability. The gait trainer attachment, in combination with ordinary exercise equipment, permits the patient to exercise and regain strength independently without requiring medical supervision or special equipment. In addition to strengthening the muscles and bones in the compromised limb and improving the overall health of the patient, a return to normal exercise as quickly as possible can benefit the patient's attitude toward recovery and physical therapy.
While conventional gait trainers provide patients with some options for rehabilitative exercise, they are not well-suited for use outside of physical therapy sessions or for endurance training because they can be cumbersome, prohibitively expensive, and incompatible with common exercise equipment. Thus, amputee, monoplegic, or other patients with reduced mobility may find it difficult or impossible to use traditional gait training devices outside of physical therapy or to use them for prolonged periods of time, such as for endurance training. Other more accessible or portable means for gait training, such as gait training walkers, may be impractical for rehabilitative endurance training because they are not designed for use with pre-existing exercise equipment used in endurance training and can limited in use by surface conditions (e.g. uneven or nonexistent sidewalks) and available space. The gait trainer attachment described herein, in aspects, gives an amputee patient the ability to use common exercise equipment for rehabilitation and endurance training by providing a compromised limb gait system that guides the compromised limb through a biomechanically proper gait motion connected to a frame designed to attach to the exercise equipment.
General Overview
Referring to
In embodiments, the compromised limb gait system 104 guides the patient's compromised limb through a simulated walking or running motion. A leg brace 106, attached to the compromised limb gait system 104 through a yoke 116, is fitted to the patient's compromised limb. In embodiments, the compromised limb gait system 104 comprises the yoke 116, a swing arm 118, a height adjustment mechanism 120, and a frame-gait system connector 122. The compromised limb gait system 104 can restrict or direct motion of the compromised limb to encourage movement of the limb in the proper, biomechanical gait. The gait trainer attachment 100 encourages the patient to shift some of their weight onto the compromised limb during exercise, strengthening the limb and facilitating rehabilitation. At the same time, the gait trainer attachment reduces abduction and adduction of the limb. By encouraging proper gait motion when used with common exercise equipment, the illustrated gait trainer attachment 100 can allow users to train in ways otherwise restricted by the time constraints of ordinary physical therapy sessions and the equipment limitations of ordinary gait trainers. The illustrated gait trainer attachment 100 is particularly well-suited for extended duration endurance training.
Frame
Referring to
In the embodiments depicted in
Compromised Limb Gait System
Referring now to
In embodiments, the swing arm 118 comprises one or more swing arm linkages 128 that are connected to the height adjustment mechanism 120 and each other via one or more hinge joints 130. These hinge joints permit substantially planar movement of the swing arm linkages 128, helping to guide the motion of the compromised limb and reducing lateral movement of the limb. In other embodiments, the swing arm 118 is fixed to the height adjustment mechanism 120 or the other types of joints can be used to connect the swing arm 118 to the height adjustment mechanism 120 and the swing arm linkages 128 to each other. The yoke 116 connects the leg brace 106 to the swing arm 118 and in the illustrated embodiment is connected to the swing arm 118 via a ball joint 132, shown in detail in
As shown, in the illustrated embodiment, the yoke 116 connects to each side of the leg brace 106 with a pin joint or revolute joint. This allows the leg brace 106 to rotate freely with respect to the yoke 116, while restricting lateral movement. Connecting proximate to the knee of the user, or below the hip, is particularly advantageous as it allows the rotational mobility of the pin or revolute joint to replace, or work in combination with, the natural rotational mobility of the knee. In addition, by connecting proximate to the knee and below the hip of the user, the gait trainer attachment 100 does not need to be customized to fit the waist or hip dimensions of the user.
In embodiments, the leg brace 106 is detachable so that it can be placed on or fitted to the compromised limb of the user. This allows the user to attach the leg brace 106 in a seated, comfortable position. Once the leg brace 106 is fitted to the limb, the leg brace 106 can be attached to the compromised limb gait system 104 via the pin joints and move in a natural manner. The yoke 116 and swing arm linkages 128 control movement of the leg brace 106 and compromised limb facilitating normal gait mechanics and encouraging proper walking motion.
In embodiments, as depicted in
The length of the swing arm linkages 128 and height of the compromised limb gait system 104 can be customized for the stride of the user and can be used to prevent drag of the compromised limb. The length of the swing arm linkages can limit the rearward motion of the swing arm 118, which prevents the swing arm 118, and therefore the compromised limb, from extending too far to the rear of the gait trainer attachment 100. This encourages the patient to stride with the compromised limb and discourages dragging of the limb. By stopping the rearward motion of the swing arm 118, the length of the swing arm 118 communicates to the patient when the simulated gait motion has been completed for a particular step and when it is time to begin another step and continue the simulated gait motion. In another embodiment, the swing arm linkage 128 can include a hard stop implemented as a simple bar that limits the rotation of the swing arm 118 relative to the height adjustment mechanism 120, thereby limiting the rearward motion of the swing arm 118.
Referring to
Leg Brace
Referring now to
Referring to
In depicted embodiments, in the case of a patient that is monoplegic or has reduced function in their compromised limb, but is not an amputee, the leg brace 106 can be attached to the compromised limb and can extend from the thigh to the foot of the patient or any portion thereof. In this embodiment, the leg brace 106 can either support and direct movement of the knee or ankle joints or fix those joints in place. In
Methods of Use
In an embodiment, to use the gait trainer attachment 100, the patient first attaches the frame 102 with the connected compromised limb gait system 104 to compatible exercise equipment 108, for example, a treadmill. In preparation to attach the frame 102 to the exercise equipment 108, the user first lengthens or shortens the horizontal bar(s) 110 for the exercise equipment 108. Next, the user secures the horizontal bar 110 to the grab bars 126 or comparable side components of the exercise equipment 108. In other embodiments, the user would also lengthen or shorten the attachment arms 114 and secure the attachment arms 114 to the front portion of the exercise equipment 108. Then, the user fixes the compromised limb gait system 104 to the frame 102 at the desired position using the frame-gait system connector 122 and adjusts the height of the compromised limb gait system 104 using the height adjustment mechanism 120. Once the gait trainer attachment 100 is secured to the exercise equipment 108 and the height set, the user attaches the leg brace 106 to the compromised limb. In other embodiments, the user could detach the leg brace 106, attach the leg brace 106 to the compromised limb, then reattach the leg brace 106 to the yoke 116. Beginning his or her first stride, the user begins the kicking motion on the side of the compromised limb and progresses forward through the force on the solid limb. While the user activates his or her own muscles, the compromised limb gait system 104 will permit the compromised limb to move in an approximation of their normal gait motion. This enables the leg to move through the proper biomechanics of walking or running and allows the force of the compromised limb to be absorbed through the thigh and hip. Some embodiments, for example use with a treadmill, may require the user to begin his or her first stride while simultaneously initiating motion of the exercise equipment 108. While the steps of use are described in a particular order, variations in order of the steps are contemplated.
What has been described above includes examples of aspects of the claimed subject matter. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the claimed subject matter, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the disclosed subject matter are possible. Accordingly, the disclosed subject matter is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “has” or “having” or variations in form thereof are used in either the detailed description or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/916,866, filed on Oct. 18, 2019, entitled “Rehabilitative Gait Trainer with Brace Interface for Use on a Treadmill” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4697808 | Larson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
5000440 | Lynch | Mar 1991 | A |
5502851 | Costello | Apr 1996 | A |
5588456 | Hart | Dec 1996 | A |
5662560 | Svendsen | Sep 1997 | A |
5702326 | Renteria | Dec 1997 | A |
5728164 | Ferrari et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5766236 | Detty et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6343802 | Workman et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6520891 | Stephens, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6607202 | Palmer | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6645126 | Martin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652427 | Wroclawsky | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6832770 | Wright-Ott et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7150722 | Tyrell | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7422550 | Pinero et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
8905951 | Barriskill et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9044630 | Lampert | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9370680 | Macaulay | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9415205 | Lasko et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9474928 | Maresh | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9616282 | Tholkes et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649243 | Johnson et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9662526 | Agrawal et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10076656 | Dar et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10376734 | Razon | Aug 2019 | B1 |
10406059 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10493309 | Jue | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10493315 | Rubin | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10561894 | Dalebout | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10729604 | Tsusaka | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10870198 | Asbeck et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
11259982 | Ognibene | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11291600 | Van Raemdonck | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20020010056 | Borsheim | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030093021 | Goffer | May 2003 | A1 |
20040023759 | Duncan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040242347 | Langhorn | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060128537 | Philips | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20100170546 | Popovic et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100285929 | Bayerlein | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110082013 | Bastian | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120000496 | Razon | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130005541 | Robinson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140087922 | Bayerlein | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140213951 | Pietrusisnki | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140228186 | Montgomery | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150075575 | Karlovich | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150080187 | Beane | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150087484 | Bayerlein | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150351995 | Zoss et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160001118 | Kuehne | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160089563 | Dilli | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160166454 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160310731 | Dixon | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331626 | Fellingham et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170136295 | Tholkes | May 2017 | A1 |
20180330647 | Sipek | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180330817 | Avni et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190015273 | Linon | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190046828 | Kuehne | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190054335 | Yeh | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190060154 | Lee et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190083843 | Del Monaco | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190099315 | Kuehne et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190183719 | Koscielski | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190216674 | Maggu et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190231632 | Hoekelmann et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190282431 | Moore | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200222754 | Walker | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
106334265 | Jan 2017 | CN |
2907495 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2484463 | Apr 2012 | GB |
157028 | Nov 2015 | RU |
WO2006118756 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2014001853 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO2014177206 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62916866 | Oct 2019 | US |