In many circuit arrangements, a logic signal must he transmitted between two circuits that must otherwise be electrically isolated from one another. For example, the transmitting circuit could utilize high internal voltages that would present a hazard to the receiving circuit or individuals in contact with that circuit. In the more general case, the isolating circuit must provide both voltage and noise isolation across an insulating barrier. Such isolation circuits are often referred to as “galvanic isolators”. One class of galvanic isolators is based on transforming the logic signal to a light signal that is then transmitted to an optical receiver in the receiving circuit that converts the optical signal back to an electrical signal. The transmitting and receiving circuits are typically on separate substrates and connected to separate power supplies. While a significant number of commercial galvanic isolators are based on such optical transmission, optical galvanic isolators have a number of problems. For example, these circuits are electrically inefficient. Only a fraction of the signal power can be converted to an optical signal using a light emitting diode or similar device. At the receiver, the fraction of the power in the light signal that is recovered by the photodetector is very small. Hence, optical galvanic isolators require high power and signal amplification. In addition, the level of isolation provided by the circuits is limited by RF fields generated in the transmitting circuit and in the ambient environment, which are received by the circuitry in the receiving circuit and which are not related to the signals that are being sent optically. In principle, a conductive barrier can be utilized to shield the receiving circuit; however, such barriers block a portion of the light in the optical signal, and hence, further reduce the electrical efficiency of the isolator.
To overcome these limitations and others, a class of galvanic isolators based on one or more electrical transducers have been developed. One example is a transformer. In these galvanic isolators, the transmitter drives the primary winding of a transformer and the receiver is connected across the secondary winding. Typically, the transmitter and the two windings are constructed on a first semiconductor chip and the receiver is constructed on a separate chip that is connected to the first chip by wire bonds or the like. The two transformer windings are, typically, deposited over the drive circuits on the first chip by patterning two of the metal layers that are typically provided in conventional semiconductor fabrication processes.
The size of the transmitter chip is set by the size of the transformer coils, which typically require a significant area of silicon compared to the drive circuitry. The cost of the semiconductor substrate is a significant fraction of the cost of the isolator. This is a particularly significant problem in devices designed to operate at relatively low frequencies where large coils are required to provide the coupling between the transmitter and receiver. In addition, many applications require multiple independent galvanic isolators on a single substrate. Cross-talk between the isolators constructed on silicon substrates using conventional semiconductor fabrication techniques is difficult to block in a cost-effective manner because of fringe fields generated by one coil being coupled to an adjacent coil. If the chips are separated by a sufficient distance on the silicon substrate, the cost of the wasted silicon becomes significant.
In addition to the wasted silicon area, devices constructed using conventional silicon integrated circuit fabrication have limitations that are imposed by the design rules of the fabrication line and the limitations as to materials that are allowed on that line. For many applications, the dielectric insulation between the coils of the transformer must withstand voltages in excess of 1000 volts. The thickness of dielectric that is available in conventional CMOS fabrication lines is insufficient to provide this degree of insulation. In addition, in some applications, it would be advantageous to provide a ferrite layer between the coils of the transformer to improve the coupling efficiency. However, the materials in question cannot be utilized in many conventional fabrication lines.
The present invention includes a galvanic isolator having a split circuit element, a substrate, a transmitter and a receiver. The split circuit element has first and second portions. The substrate includes an insulating polymeric or polymeric/inorganic layer having first and second surfaces, the first and second portions are disposed on the substrate. The first portion of the circuit element can be disposed on the first surface, and the second portion can be disposed on the second surface. Alternatively, both portions can be disposed on the first surface. The choice of configuration depends on the specific split circuit element being implemented. The transmitter receives an input signal and couples a signal derived from the input signal to the first portion. The receiver is connected to the second portion of the circuit element and generates an output signal that is coupled to an external circuit. In one aspect of the invention, the split circuit element includes a transformer having a primary coil that includes the first portion and a secondary coil that includes the second portion. In another aspect of the invention, the split circuit element includes a capacitor having a first plate that includes the first portion and a second plate that includes the second portion. In yet another aspect of the invention, the split circuit element includes a transmitting antenna and a receiving antenna; the transmitting antenna includes the first portion, and the receiving antenna includes the second portion. In another aspect of the invention, the substrate is flexible.
The manner in which the present invention provides its advantages can be more easily understood with reference to
Each coil has an outer end and an inner end. Each of these ends must be connected to the appropriate terminals on the transmitter or receiver chip associated with that coil. For each coil, one connection is made by a trace that is formed with the coil when the metal layer from which the coil is patterned is etched and one connection is made by a patterned metal layer on the outer surface of the substrate. For example, the connection to the inner end 26 of coil 23 is made via trace 25 on the outer surface of insulating layer 34. The connection to the outer end of coil 23 is made via trace 27 that is patterned from the same layer as coil 23. Trace 27 is connected to chip 22 by a vertical via through layer 34. Similarly, chip 21 is connected to the outer end of coil 24 by a trace 29 and vertical via 30, trace 29 being patterned from the same metal layer as coil 24. The inner end of coil 24 is connected to chip 21 by a trace 28 on the bottom surface of insulating layer 32 through a conducting via 31. Insulating layers may be added outside of the layers of metal including traces 25 and 28 to prevent electrical contact between traces 25 or 28 and outside conductors.
The structure shown in
If wire bonding can be utilized, the structure shown in
Coil 42 is connected to receiver 22 by trace 53 that is patterned from the top metal layer and by wire bond 54. Finally, the various connection pads for connecting galvanic isolator 40 to the external circuits that are to be isolated by galvanic isolator 40 are also patterned from the top metal layer. Exemplary connections pads of this type are shown at 55 and 56.
As noted above, a galvanic isolator according to the present invention can be constructed using conventional printed circuit board fabrication techniques. As will be explained in more detail below, embodiments based on flexible organic/inorganic or organic substrates are particularly attractive. Printed circuit boards or circuit carriers are known to the art, and hence, will not be discussed in detail here. For the purposes of the present discussion it is sufficient to note that printed circuit boards can be fabricated by depositing thin metal layers, or attaching metal layers, on a somewhat flexible organic/inorganic substrate formed of fiberglass impregnated with epoxy resin and then converting the layers into a plurality of individual conductors by conventional photolithographic techniques. Flex circuit technology is also a useful means of embodiment. Here substrates are made of an organic material such as polyimide. Films and laminates of this type are available commercially from Dupont and utilize substrates called Kapton™ made from polyimide and, in some cases, a plurality of layers are laminated with an adhesive. This type of circuit carrier or printed circuit board is significantly less expensive than silicon substrate-based circuitry and can be provided with relatively thin substrates. Thinner substrates are preferred in applications in which signal losses between the primary and secondary coils must be minimized. In one embodiment, a Pyralux AP laminate from Dupont that has a 2 mils thick Kapton™ layer and copper layers on the top and bottom surfaces is utilized.
The above-described embodiments utilize a substrate on which both coils of the transformer are fabricated by patterning and connecting various metal layers. However, in some situations, constructing a galvanic isolator from two separate transformer components provides significant advantages. Refer now to
Refer now to
In
It should also be noted that layer 73 could include other materials that enhance the coupling efficiency of the two coils. For example, in embodiments in which high frequencies do not have to be accommodated, layer 73 could include a ferrite material that increases the coil coupling efficiency.
The embodiment shown in
Refer now to
Refer now to
Embodiments in which substrate 122 and the metal layers are part of a flexible circuit carrier have still further advantages. In some cases, the area available for mounting the galvanic isolator is limited. That is, the galvanic isolator must have a relatively small “footprint”. In some of these cases, the area needed to implement the coils is larger than the footprint in question. Hence, to provide a galvanic isolator with the desired footprint, the coils must be implemented in a vertical arrangement to reduce that amount of horizontal surface area needed to mount the isolator. A component coil design such as that described above in which the component coils are constructed on a flexible circuit carrier provides a cost effective solution to this problem.
Refer now to
The above-described embodiments of the present invention utilize a split transformer arrangement to perform the isolation of the two circuits. However, embodiments that utilize other types of split circuit elements can also be constructed. For example, isolators based on capacitors in which the transmitting circuit drives one plate of a capacitor and the receiver is attached to the other plate of the capacitor can also be constructed. Refer now to
It should also be noted that embodiments in which the transmitter and receiver plates are on separate substrates could also be constructed. Such embodiments are similar to those described above with the coils being replaced by the plates of the capacitor. Such two-substrate embodiments are useful in constructing embodiments that are analogous to that discussed above with reference to
Embodiments based on a split antenna arrangement could also be constructed. In such embodiments, the capacitor plates described above with reference to
In some cases, the galvanic isolators described above must function in environments having a significant amount of electrical interference. Since the split circuit elements used to construct the isolator can act as antennae that pickup this interference, embodiments that include shielding are required to prevent the received interference from altering the data signals being sent between the transmitter and receiver chips. Refer now to
It should be noted that the low cost of the substrates used in the present invention makes the incorporation of such shielding economically attractive. Refer now to
In the above-described embodiments of the present invention, the traces on the top and bottom surfaces of the galvanic isolator are exposed. It is sometimes useful to provide a covering for the exposed traces to protect the traces from damage. One method for providing a protective cover layer is to utilize the polyamide layers used in flexible circuit carriers such as those described above. Layers of polyamide that arc covered with an adhesive are available commercially from Dupont. One such layer consists of a 0.5 mil layer of polyamide that is coated on one side with an adhesive that is 0.5 mil thick. The protective layer can be cut to provide holes in the layer that provide access to pads that require electrical connection or that are used for bonding chips such as the transmitter and receiver chips discussed above. After the layer is patterned, the protective backing is removed from the adhesive surface and the layer is pressed onto the corresponding surfaces of the galvanic isolator. The various wirebond connections and chip bonding is then carried out.
Refer now to
As noted above, the split circuit element can be constructed from a transmitting antenna and a receiving antenna. In the embodiments described above, the first and second portions of the split circuit element are disposed on different surfaces of the polymeric substrate. However, in the case of an antenna pair, the first and second portions can be disposed on the same surface separated by a distance that is sufficient to assure that the transmitting antenna does not arc to the receiving antenna. Refer now to
Various modifications to the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Accordingly, the present invention is to be limited solely by the scope of the following claims.
This is a divisional application of co-pending application Ser. No. 11/512,034, filed on Aug. 28, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4027152 | Brown et al. | May 1977 | A |
4236086 | Hoebel | Nov 1980 | A |
4494100 | Stengel et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4541894 | Cassat | Sep 1985 | A |
4931075 | Kuhn | Jun 1990 | A |
5015972 | Cygan et al. | May 1991 | A |
5070317 | Bhagat | Dec 1991 | A |
5312674 | Haertling et al. | May 1994 | A |
5363081 | Bando et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5420558 | Ito et al. | May 1995 | A |
5504668 | Beyerlein | Apr 1996 | A |
5597979 | Courtney et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5659462 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5693971 | Gonzales | Dec 1997 | A |
5716713 | Zsamboky et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5754088 | Fletcher et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768111 | Zaitsu | Jun 1998 | A |
5825259 | Harpham | Oct 1998 | A |
5952849 | Haigh | Sep 1999 | A |
6167475 | Carr | Dec 2000 | A |
6175293 | Hasegawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198374 | Abel | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215377 | Douriet et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255714 | Kossives et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300617 | Daughton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307457 | Wissink et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320532 | Diede | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6404317 | Mizoguchi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476704 | Goff | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6489850 | Heineke et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501364 | Hui et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525566 | Haigh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538313 | Smith | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545059 | Fichou | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556117 | Nakao et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574091 | Heineke et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6661079 | Bikulcius et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6686825 | Tamezawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6856226 | Gardner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859130 | Nakashima et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867678 | Yang | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870456 | Gardner | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873065 | Haigh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888438 | Hui et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6891461 | Gardner | May 2005 | B2 |
6903578 | Haigh et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919775 | Wendt et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922080 | Haigh et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943658 | Gardner | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944009 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7016490 | Beutler et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7064442 | Lane et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7170807 | Fazan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171739 | Yang et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7302247 | Dupuis | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7376212 | Dupuis | May 2008 | B2 |
7421028 | Dupuis | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7425787 | Larson, III | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436282 | Whittaker et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447492 | Dupuis | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460604 | Dupuis | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7545059 | Chen | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577223 | Alfano | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7650130 | Dupuis | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7683654 | Chen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692444 | Chen | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7719305 | Chen | May 2010 | B2 |
7737871 | Leung et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738568 | Alfano | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741943 | Fouquet | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746943 | Yamaura | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7821428 | Laung | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7856219 | Dupuis | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7920010 | Chen | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7932799 | Loef et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948067 | Dominique et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8049573 | Alfano | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8061017 | Fouquet | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064872 | Dupuis | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093983 | Fouquet | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20020075116 | Peels et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020110013 | Park et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135236 | Haigh et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030042571 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040056749 | Kahlmann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050003199 | Takaya et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050057277 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077993 | Kanno et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094302 | Matsuzaki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128038 | Hyvonen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133249 | Fujii | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050269657 | Dupuis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272378 | Dupuis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028313 | Strzalkowski et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060095639 | Guenin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152322 | Whittaker et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170527 | Braunisch | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176137 | Sato et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060214759 | Kawarai | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220775 | Ishikawa | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070080587 | Ruizenaar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085447 | Larson, III | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085632 | Larson, III et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086274 | Nishimura et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070133923 | Han | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070281394 | Kawabe et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290784 | Nesse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007382 | Snyder | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031286 | Alfano et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051158 | Male et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061631 | Fouquet et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080174396 | Choi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176362 | Sengupta et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179963 | Fouquet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180206 | Fouquet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198904 | Chang | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080278275 | Fouquet et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284552 | Lim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080308817 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311862 | Spina et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090072819 | Takahashi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090243782 | Fouquet et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090243783 | Fouquet et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268486 | Ljusev et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100020448 | Ng et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100052120 | Pruitt | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100176660 | Fouquet | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188182 | Fouquet et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100259909 | Ho et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100328902 | Ho et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110075449 | Fouquet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095620 | Fouquet | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1180277 | Apr 1998 | CN |
1237081 | Dec 1999 | CN |
19911133 | Oct 2000 | DE |
10154906 | May 2003 | DE |
1309033 | May 2003 | EP |
1617337 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2403072 | Jun 2004 | GB |
57-39598 | Mar 1982 | JP |
61-59714 | Mar 1986 | JP |
3171705 | Jul 1991 | JP |
06-53052 | Feb 1994 | JP |
8-241955 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2000-508116 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2003-151829 | May 2003 | JP |
2005-513824 | May 2005 | JP |
2008-61236 | Mar 2008 | JP |
WO-9734349 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO-2005001928 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-20060033071 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Biersach et al., “Designing Medical Electrical Equipment to Meet Safety Certification and Regulatory Requirements”, Underwriters Laboratories, 6 pages, Table 2, Jan. 2002. |
Doane et al., “Multichip Module Technologies and Alternatives—The Basics”, Section 5.3.2, p. 185, 1993. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,956, filed Nov. 1, 2005, Guenin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/512,034, filed Aug. 28, 2006, Fouquet et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/747,092, filed May 10, 2007, Fouquet et al. |
“Texas Instruments Dual Digital Isolators”, SLLS755E Jul. 2007. |
Allflex Flexible Printed Circuit, “Design Guide”, <http://www.allflexinc.com> Retrieved Feb. 12, 2009. |
Analog Devices, “iCoupler R Digital Isolation Products”, 2005. |
Analog Devices, Inc., “iCoupler Digital Isolator ADuM1100 Data Sheet,”,Rev F 2006. |
Avago Technologies, “ACCL-9xxx 3.3V/5V High Speed CMOS Capacitive Isolator”, Preliminary Datasheet. 2005. |
Chen, Baoxing et al., “High Speed Digital Isolators Using Microscale On-Chip Transformers”, Jul. 22, 2003. |
Chen, Baoxing, “iCoupler Products with iso Power Technology”, “Signal and Power Transfer Across Isolation Barrier Using Microtransformers” Analog Devices 2006. |
Electronic Design, “Planar Transformers make Maximum Use of Precious Board Space”, Penton Media, Inc., ED Online ID #7647 Mar. 9, 1998. |
Kliger, R., “Integrated Transformer-Coupled Isolation”, Mar. 2003. |
Krupka, J. et al., “Measurements of Permittivity, Loss Dielectric Tangent, and Resistivity of Float-Zone Silicon at Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Abstract Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Transaction on vol. 54, Issue 11 Nov. 2006 , 3995-4001. |
Myers, John et al., “GMR Isolators”, Nonvalatile Electronics, Inc. 1998. |
Oljaca, Miroslav, “Interfacing the ADS1202 Modulator with a Pulse Transformer in Galvanically Isolated Systems”, SBAA096 Jun. 2003 , 22 pages. |
Payton Group International, “Off the Shelf SMT Planar Transformers”, <http://www.paytongroup.com> Retrieved Mar. 31, 2008. |
Rogers Corporation, “Advanced Circuit Materials, High Frequency Laminates and Flexible Circuit Materials”, <http://www.rogerscorporation.com/mwu/translations/prod.htm> Mar. 2008. |
Smith, Carl H. et al., “Chip-Size Magnetic Sensor Arrays”, May 21, 2002. |
Yang, Ru-Yuan , “Loss Characteristics of Silicon Substrate with Different Resistivities”, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 48, No. 9. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100176660 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11512034 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 12731999 | US |