The present invention relates to compositions for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration less than two hours after eating. The present invention also relates to modified release formulations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate having improved pharmacokinetic (PK) properties in the fed state, and to therapeutic uses thereof.
Narcolepsy is a devastating disabling condition. The cardinal symptoms are excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy (a sudden loss of muscle tone triggered by strong emotions, seen in approximately 60% of patients), hypnogogic hallucination (HH), sleep paralysis (SP), and disturbed nocturnal sleep (DNS). Other than EDS, DNS is the most common symptom seen among narcolepsy patients.
One of the major treatments for narcolepsy is sodium oxybate. The precise mechanism by which sodium oxybate produces an effect is unknown, however sodium oxybate is thought to act by promoting SWS (delta sleep) and consolidating night-time sleep. Sodium oxybate administered before nocturnal sleep increases Stages 3 and 4 sleep and increases sleep latency, while reducing the frequency of sleep onset REM periods (SOREMPs). Other mechanisms, which have yet to be elucidated, may also be involved.
Sodium oxybate is also known as sodium 4-hydroxybutanoate, or gamma-hydroxybutyric acid sodium salt, and has the following chemical structure:
Sodium oxybate is marketed commercially in the United States as Xyrem®. The product is formulated as an immediate release liquid solution that is taken once immediately before bed, and a second time approximately 2.5 to 4 hours later, in equal doses. Sleep-onset may be dramatic and fast, and patients are advised to be sitting in bed when consuming the dose. The most commonly reported side effects are nausea, dizziness, vomiting, somnolence, enuresis and tremor.
One critical drawback of Xyrem® is the requirement to take the first does at least 2 hours after eating. Specifically, Xyrem®'s label expressly advises “[t]ake the first dose of Xyrem® at least 2 hours after eating because food significantly reduces the bioavailability of sodium oxybate.” The medical problem cautioned against by the Xyrem® label and unaddressed by the prior art is a deleterious food effect on the absorption of GHB. As noted in the FDA's Xyrem® Risk Management Program, “Because food significantly reduces the bioavailability of sodium oxybate, the patient should try to eat well before (several hours) going to sleep and taking the first dose of sodium oxybate. Patients should try to minimize variability in the timing of dosing in relation to meals.” (See https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2002/21196lbl.pdf). As a practical matter, the food effect obstacle of the prior art creates a variety of unmet problems for the patient because it is not always possible to eat several hours before sleep. Likewise, despite best efforts, a patient may have variability in the timing of dosing in relation to meals due to unforeseen schedule changes, travel, etc. As a result, the food effect problem of the prior art necessarily causes reduced patient compliance, reduced efficacy, and reduced safety. Moreover, since GHB is a known drug of abuse, there is inherently a greater risk of abuse, including accidental abuse, as a result of Xyrem®'s food effect problem.
Scientific studies have shown that after a high-fat meal the intestinal uptake of GHB may be significantly decreased due to the inhibition of anionic transporters, such as the Monocarboxylic Acid Transporters (MCTs). MCTs are transport proteins that determine the absorption, renal clearance, and distribution of GHB throughout the body. Recent studies have shown the MCT-mediated intestinal absorption of GHB to occur in a concentration- and proton gradient-dependent manner and via a carrier-mediated process along the length of the intestine. The MCT-mediated intestinal absorption of GHB is important for its pharmacological activity because more than 99% of GHB is ionized and cannot diffuse across cellular membranes at physiologic pH.
Accordingly, there is a need for compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that can be administered less than two hours after eating without compromising safety or efficacy.
In an aspect, the present disclosure encompasses an oral pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness that may be administered less than two hours after eating. For example, a composition including gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be in a unit dose suitable for administration less than two hours after eating. In additional aspects, the composition may me suitable for once-daily administration. In some aspects, the composition provides a mean AUCinf and/or mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean AUCinf or mean Cmax when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating. When administered less than two hours after eating, the composition may provide an AUCinf and/or a Cmax bioequivalent to an AUCinf or Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating. In some aspects, a 6 g dose of the composition administered less than two hours after eating has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 240 hr*μ/mL, and a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Further provided herein is a method of treating narcolepsy and associated disorders and symptoms in a patient in need thereof by administering an oral pharmaceutical composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate less than two hours after eating. In an aspect, the composition may be administered once-daily. In some aspects, the composition may be administered in the morning or the evening after eating. In other aspects, sleep is includes for at least six consecutive hours.
In additional aspects, a method of treating narcolepsy and associated disorders and symptoms in a patient in need thereof may include administering an oral pharmaceutical composition comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate once daily, where the composition is dose proportional. The Cmax of the composition may be dose proportional across one or more of 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g doses of the composition.
Also provided herein are oral pharmaceutical compositions and methods thereof for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration once daily, where most adverse events (AEs) occur during the T max period (around Cmax). In another aspect, compositions and methods are provided for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration once daily, wherein most adverse events (AEs) occur close to Tmax, during the Cmax period. In some embodiments of this aspect, administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition less than two hours after eating may result in fewer AEs than administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition at least two hours after eating. The oral pharmaceutical composition of some embodiments may have a more favorable safety profile (i.e., fewer AEs) as compared to an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses.
Other aspects and iterations of the invention are described more thoroughly below.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of embodiments of the formulation, methods of treatment using some embodiments of the formulation, and the Examples included therein.
Wherever an analysis or test is required to understand a given property or characteristic recited herein, it will be understood that the analysis or test is performed in accordance with applicable guidances, draft guidances, regulations and monographs of the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and United States Pharmacopoeia (“USP”) applicable to drug products in the United States in force as of Nov. 1, 2015 unless otherwise specified. Clinical endpoints may be judged with reference to standards adopted by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, including standards published at C Iber, S Ancoli-Israel, A Chesson, S F Quan. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Westchester, Ill.: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2007.
When a pharmacokinetic comparison is made between a formulation described or claimed herein and a reference product, it will be understood that the comparison is performed in a suitable designed cross-over trial, although it will also be understood that a cross-over trial is not required unless specifically stated. It will also be understood that the comparison may be made either directly or indirectly. For example, even if a formulation has not been tested directly against a reference formulation, it can still satisfy a comparison to the reference formulation if it has been tested against a different formulation, and the comparison with the reference formulation may be deduced therefrom.
As used in this specification and in the claims which follow, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “an ingredient” includes mixtures of ingredients, reference to “an active pharmaceutical agent” includes more than one active pharmaceutical agent, and the like.
“Bioavailability” means the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action.
“Relative bioavailability” or “Rel BA” or “RBA” means the percentage of mean AUCinf of the tested product relative to the mean AUCinf of the reference product for an equal total dose. Unless otherwise specified, relative bioavailability refers to the percentage of the mean AUCinf observed for a full dose of the test product relative to the mean AUCinf observed for two ½-doses of an immediate release liquid solution administered four hours apart for an equal total dose.
“Bioequivalence” means the absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives become available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study.
When ranges are given by specifying the lower end of a range separately from the upper end of the range, it will be understood that the range may be defined by selectively combining any one of the lower end variables with any one of the upper end variables that is mathematically and physically possible. Thus, for example, if a formulation may contain from 1 to 10 weight parts of a particular ingredient, or 2 to 8 parts of a particular ingredient, it will be understood that the formulation may also contain from 2 to 10 parts of the ingredient. In like manner, if a formulation may contain greater than 1 or 2 weight parts of an ingredient and up to 10 or 9 weight parts of the ingredient, it will be understood that the formulation may contain 1-10 weight parts of the ingredient, 2-9 weight parts of the ingredient, etc. unless otherwise specified, the boundaries of the range (lower and upper ends of the range) are included in the claimed range.
In like manner, when various sub-embodiments of a senior (i.e. principal) embodiment are described herein, it will be understood that the sub-embodiments for the senior embodiment may be combined to define another sub-embodiment. Thus, for example, when a principal embodiment includes sub-embodiments 1, 2 and 3, it will be understood that the principal embodiment may be further limited by any one of sub-embodiments 1, 2 and 3, or any combination of sub-embodiments 1, 2 and 3 that is mathematically and physically possible. In like manner, it will be understood that the principal embodiments described herein may be combined in any manner that is mathematically and physically possible, and that the invention extends to such combinations.
When used herein the term “about” or “substantially” or “approximately” will compensate for variability allowed for in the pharmaceutical industry and inherent in pharmaceutical products, such as differences in product strength due to manufacturing variation and time-induced product degradation. The term allows for any variation which in the practice of pharmaceuticals would allow the product being evaluated to be considered bioequivalent to the recited strength, as described in FDA's March 2003 Guidance for Industry on BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES FOR ORALLY ADMINISTERED DRUG PRODUCTS—GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.
When used herein the term “gamma-hydroxybutyrate” or GHB, unless otherwise specified, refers to the free base of gamma hydroxy-butyrate, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, and combinations thereof, their hydrates, solvates, complexes or tautomers forms. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid salts may be selected from the sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or sodium oxybate, the potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, the magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, the calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, the lithium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric, the tetra ammonium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid or any other pharmaceutically acceptable salt forms of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid.
“Pharmaceutically acceptable” means that which is useful in preparing a pharmaceutical composition that is generally safe, non-toxic and neither biologically nor otherwise undesirable and includes that which is acceptable for veterinary use as well as human pharmaceutical use. The term “formulation” or “composition” refers to the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of a drug product or dosage form prepared in accordance with the current invention.
As used herein the doses and strengths of gamma-hydroxybutyrate are expressed in equivalent-gram (g) weights of sodium oxybate unless stated expressly to the contrary. Thus, when considering a dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate other than the sodium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, one must convert the recited dose or strength from sodium oxybate to the gamma-hydroxybutyrate under evaluation. Thus, if an embodiment is said to provide a 4.5 g dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, because the form of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is not specified, it will be understood that the dose encompasses a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate, a 5.1 g dose of potassium gamma-hydroxybutyrate (assuming a 126.09 g/mol MW for sodium oxybate and a 142.20 g/mol MW for potassium gamma-hydroxybutyrate), and a 3.7 g dose of the free base (assuming a 126.09 g/mol MW for sodium oxybate and a 104.1 g/mol MW for the free base of gamma-hydroxybutyrate), or by the weight of any mixture of salts of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid that provides the same amount of GHB as 4.5 g of sodium oxybate.
As used herein “microparticle” means any discreet particle of solid material. The particle may be made of a single material or have a complex structure with core and shells and be made of several materials. The terms “microparticle”, “particle”, “microspheres” or “pellet” are interchangeable and have the same meaning. Unless otherwise specified, the microparticle has no particular particle size or diameter and is not limited to particles with volume mean diameter D(4,3) below 1 mm.
As used herein, the “volume mean diameter D(4,3)” is calculated according to the following formula:
D(4,3)=Σ(d4i·ni)/Σ(d3i·ni)
wherein the diameter d of a given particle is the diameter of a hard sphere having the same volume as the volume of that particle.
As used herein, the terms “composition”, “oral composition”, “oral pharmaceutical composition”, “finished composition”, “finished formulation” or “formulation” are interchangeable and designate the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprising modified release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, immediate release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and any other excipients. The composition may be described as extended release, delayed release, or modified release.
As used herein, “immediate release” means release of the major part of gamma-hydroxybutyrate over a relatively short period, e.g. at least 75% of the AP is released in 0.75 h, for example, in 30 min.
As used herein, an “immediate release (IR) portion” of a formulation includes physically discreet portions of a formulation, mechanistically discreet portions of a formulation, and pharmacokinetically discreet portions of a formulation that lend to or support a defined IR pharmacokinetic characteristic. Thus, for example, any formulation that releases active ingredient at the rate and extent required of the immediate release portion of the formulations of the present invention includes an “immediate release portion,” even if the immediate release portion is physically integrated in what might otherwise be considered an extended release formulation. Thus, the IR portion may be structurally discreet or structurally indiscreet from (i.e. integrated with) the MR portion. In an embodiment, the IR portion and MR portion are provided as particles, and in other embodiments the IR portion and MR portion are provided as particles discreet from each other.
As used here in, “immediate release formulation” or “immediate release portion” refers to a composition that releases at least 80% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate in 1 hour when tested in a dissolution apparatus 2 according to USP 38 <711> in a 0.1 N HCl dissolution medium at a temperature of 37° C. and a paddle speed of 75 rpm.
As used herein, “dose dumping” is understood as meaning an immediate and unwanted release of the dose after oral ingestion. In an embodiment, dose dumping may be rapid release of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the presence of alcohol.
In like manner, a “modified-release (MR) portion” includes that portion of a formulation or dosage form that lends to or supports a particular MR pharmacokinetic characteristic, regardless of the physical formulation in which the MR portion is integrated. The modified release drug delivery systems are designed to deliver drugs at a specific time or over a period of time after administration, or at a specific location in the body. The USP defines a modified release system as one in which the time course or location of drug release or both, are chosen to accomplish objectives of therapeutic effectiveness or convenience not fulfilled by conventional IR dosage forms. More specifically, MR solid oral dosage forms include extended release (ER) and delayed-release (DR) products. A DR product is one that releases a drug all at once at a time other than promptly after administration. Typically, coatings (e.g., enteric coatings) are used to delay the release of the drug substance until the dosage form has passed through the acidic medium of the stomach. An ER product is formulated to make the drug available over an extended period after ingestion, thus allowing a reduction in dosing frequency compared to a drug presented as a conventional dosage form, e.g. a solution or an immediate release dosage form. For oral applications, the term “extended-release” is usually interchangeable with “sustained-release”, “prolonged-release” or “controlled-release”.
Traditionally, extended-release systems provided constant drug release to maintain a steady concentration of drug. For some drugs, however, zero-order delivery may not be optimal and more complex and sophisticated systems have been developed to provide multi-phase delivery. One may distinguish among four categories of oral MR delivery systems: (1) delayed-release using enteric coatings, (2) site-specific or timed release (e.g. for colonic delivery), (3) extended-release (e.g., zero-order, first-order, biphasic release, etc.), and (4), programmed release (e.g., pulsatile, delayed extended release, etc.) See Modified Oral Drug Delivery Systems at page 34 in Gibaldi's DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN PHARMACEUTICAL CARE, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS, 2007 and Rational Design of Oral Modified-release Drug Delivery Systems at page 469 in DEVELOPING SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORMS: PHARMACEUTICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE, Academic Press, Elsevier, 2009. As used herein, “modified release formulation” or “modified release portion” in one embodiment refers to a composition that releases its gamma-hydroxybutyrate according a multiphase delivery that is comprised in the fourth class of MR products, e.g. delayed extended release. As such it differs from the delayed release products that are classified in the first class of MR products.
As used herein the terms “coating”, “coating layer,” “coating film,” “film coating” and like terms are interchangeable and have the same meaning. The terms refer to the coating applied to a particle comprising the gamma-hydroxybutyrate that controls the modified release of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
As used herein, “meal state” or “meal mode” includes the fed state, 2 hours post meal, and the fasted mode. A “fed state” or “fed mode” includes the period of time immediately after consumption of a meal up to two hours post meal. The fed state may include the period less than two hours after eating. A “fasted state” or “fasted mode” includes the period of time after 8 hours post meal consumption. “2 hours post meal” includes the period of time between the fed state and the fasted state. For example, “2 hours post meal” may include the period between at least 2 hours and 8 hours post meal. In all pharmacokinetic testing described herein, unless otherwise stated, the dosage form, or the initial dosage form if the dosing regimen calls for more than one administration, is administered less than two hours after eating, approximately two hours after eating, or more than 8 hours after eating. For example, the dosage form may be administered less than two hours after consumption of a standardized dinner, approximately two hours after consumption of a standardized dinner, or more than 8 hours after consumption of a standardized dinner. The standardized dinner may consist of 25.5% fat, 19.6% protein, and 54.9% carbohydrates.
A “similar PK profile”, a “substantially similar PK profile”, or “comparable bioavailability” means that the mean AUCinf of a test product is from 80% to 125% of the mean AUCinf of a reference product in a suitably designed cross-over trial, the mean plasma concentration at 8 hours (C8h) of the test product is from 40% to 130% of the mean plasma concentration at 8 hours (C8h) of the reference product, and/or that the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of the test product is from 50% to 140% of the Cmax of the reference product.
As used herein, “dose proportional” occurs when increases in the administered dose are accompanied by proportional increases in the PK profile, such as the AUC or Cmax.
A “fed state PK profile” means the mean AUCinf, the mean plasma concentration at 8 hours (C8h), and/or the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of the composition when administered less than two hours after eating.
A “2 hour post meal administration PK profile” means the mean AUCinf, the mean plasma concentration at 8 hours (C8h), and/or the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of the composition when administered at least two hours after eating.
Type 1 Narcolepsy (NT1) refers to narcolepsy characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (“EDS”) and cataplexy. Type 2 Narcolepsy (NT2) refers to narcolepsy characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness without cataplexy. A diagnosis of narcolepsy (with or without cataplexy) may be confirmed by one or a combination of (i) an overnight polysomnogram (PSG) and a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) performed within the last 2 years, (ii) a full documentary evidence confirming diagnosis from the PSG and MSLT from a sleep laboratory must be made available, (iii) current symptoms of narcolepsy including: current complaint of EDS for the last 3 months (ESS greater than 10), (iv) mean MWT less than 8 minutes, (v) mean number of cataplexy events of 8 per week on baseline Sleep/Cataplexy Diary, and/or (vi) presence of cataplexy for the last 3 months and 28 events per week during screening period.
As used herein, “adverse events” (AEs) or “treatment emergent adverse events” (TEAEs) means self-reported adverse events by a patient administered a composition for which the AEs are related. AEs or TEAEs may include but not limited to gastrointestinal disorders, nervous system disorders, somnolence, dizziness, nausea, headache, feeling drunk, vomiting, and/or fatigue.
Unless otherwise specified herein, percentages, ratios and numeric values recited herein are based on weight; averages and means are arithmetic means; all pharmacokinetic measurements based on the measurement of bodily fluids are based on plasma concentrations.
It will be understood, when defining a composition by its pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties herein, that the formulation can in the alternative be defined as “means for” achieving the recited pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties. Thus, a formulation in which the modified release portion releases less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour can instead be defined as a formulation comprising “means for” or “modified release means for” releasing less than 20% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate at one hour. It will be further understood that the structures for achieving the recited pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties are the structures described in the examples hereof that accomplish the recited pharmacokinetic or dissolution properties.
Oral Pharmaceutical Composition for Administration Less than Two Hours after Eating
As the prior art demonstrates, it is extremely difficult to find a formulation that may be administered less than 2 hours after eating a meal and that has pharmacokinetic properties comparable to an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly taken at least 2 hours after eating.
The inventors have discovered a novel relationship between in vivo gamma-hydroxybutyrate absorption of modified release particles and the effect of food on the absorption of gamma-hydroxybutyrate which permits, for the first time, a composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate that may be administered less than 2 hours after eating that approximates the bioavailability of a twice-nightly equipotent immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at least 2 hours after eating, and that does so across a range of therapeutic doses.
Provided herein is an oral pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness that includes gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration less than two hours after eating. In various embodiments, the composition may include gamma-hydroxybutyrate in an extended release formulation, delayed release formulation, or modified release formulation.
Surprisingly, the composition may be administered at any time after eating without being significantly impacted by a food effect. In an embodiment, the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating. For example, the composition may be administered concurrently with food or may be administered immediately after eating, at least 15 minutes after eating, at least 30 minutes after eating, at least 1 hour after eating, at least 1.5 hours after eating, or less than 2 hours after eating.
The composition may provide a substantially similar fed state PK profile and 2 hour post meal administration PK profile. For example, the AUCinf for the composition administered less than two hours after eating may be substantially similar to the AUCinf when the same composition is administered at least two hours after eating. In another example, the Cmax for the composition administered less than two hours after eating may be substantially similar to the Cmax when the same composition is administered at least two hours after eating.
In an embodiment, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean AUCinf that is bioequivalent to the mean AUCinf provided by an equal dose of the composition administered at least two hours after eating. In some embodiments, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean AUCinf that is from 50% to 120%, from 60% to 120%, from 70% to 120%, from 75% to 100%, from 80% to 100%, from 80 to 100%, from 90% to 100%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean AUCinf provided by an equal dose of the composition administered at least two hours after eating.
In an embodiment, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean Cmax that is bioequivalent to the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of the composition administered at least two hours after eating. In some embodiments, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140%, from 60% to 120%, from 70% to 120%, from 75% to 100%, from 80% to 100%, from 80 to 100%, from 90% to 100%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of the composition administered at least two hours after eating.
The composition may provide a substantially similar fed state PK profile and fasted state PK profile. In an example, the AUCinf for the composition administered less than two hours after eating may be substantially similar to the AUCinf when the same composition is administered in the fasted state. In yet another example, the Cmax for the composition administered less than two hours after eating may be substantially similar to the Cmax when the same composition is administered in the fasted state.
In an embodiment, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean AUCinf that is bioequivalent to the mean AUCinf provided by an equal dose of the composition administered in the fasted state. In some embodiments, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean AUCinf that is from 50% to 120%, from 60% to 120%, from 70% to 120%, from 75% to 100%, from 80% to 100%, from 80 to 100%, from 90% to 100%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean AUCinf provided by an equal dose of the composition administered in the fasted state. In an embodiment, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean AUCinf with a 90% CI that fall within the 80-125% bioequivalence range of an equal dose of the composition administered in the fasted state with no effect boundaries. In some examples, the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 80%-95% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting. In additional examples, the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 85%-90% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting. In at least one example, a ratio of the AUClast (fed) to AUClast (fasted) may be about 86 with a 90% CI of 79.9-92.6. In at least one example, a ratio of the AUCinf (fed) to AUCinf (fasted) may be about 86.1 with a 90% CI of 80.0-92.7.
In an embodiment, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean Cmax that is bioequivalent to the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of the composition administered in the fasted state. In some embodiments, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140%, from 60% to 120%, from 70% to 120%, from 75% to 100%, from 80% to 100%, from 80 to 100%, from 90% to 100%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of the composition administered in the fasted state. In an embodiment, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it may achieve a mean Cmax with a 90% CI that fall within the 80-125% bioequivalence range of an equal dose of the composition administered in the fasted state with no effect boundaries. In some examples, the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hours after eating that is 55%-80% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting. In additional examples, the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hours after eating that is 60%-75% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting. In at least one example, a ratio of the Cmax (fed) to Cmax (fasted) may be about 66.6 with a 90% CI of 58.2-76.5.
In an embodiment, the composition provides a Cmax that is dose proportional. In additional embodiments, the composition provides no dose dumping.
In an embodiment, compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may optimize the bioavailability of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and roughly approximate the bioavailability of an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly where the first dose is administered at least two hours after eating.
In some embodiments, the compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may roughly approximate or exceed the bioavailability of an equal dose of an immediate release solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly at least two hours after eating, across the entire therapeutic range of sodium oxybate doses.
In other embodiments, the compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may produce very little residual drug content in the bloodstream of most patients up to 8 hours after administration but may still be similar to the one observed after administration of an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly at least two hours after eating.
In an embodiment, there is no significant reduction in safety or efficacy to a patient following administration of the composition. In another embodiment, the compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may improve the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profile of gamma-hydroxybutyrate when administered less than two hours after eating based on novel pharmacokinetic profiles. For example, administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition less than two hours after eating may result in fewer AEs than administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition at least two hours after eating or in the fasted state.
In some embodiments, the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition has a more favorable safety profile as compared to an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses. Most adverse events (AEs) may occur close to Tmax, during the Cmax period. In an example, the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may have only one Tmax and one Cmax per day due to the once daily administration as compared to multiple Tmax and Cmax in an immediate release formulation (such as Xyrem®) requiring multiple administrations per day. Therefore, having only one Tmax and one Cmax by administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may result in fewer AEs than administration of the immediate release formulation. In an additional example, the Cmax of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may be between the Cmax of the first peak and the Cmax of the second peak of Xyrem®. The gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may have a lower Cmax than the Cmax of an equal dose of an immediate release formulation, such that administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may result in fewer AEs than administration of the immediate release formulation. Therefore, administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition once daily may result in fewer AEs than administration of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses. In other embodiments, the onset of efficacy of the composition may be earlier than Xyrem® in the fed state.
The gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may offer a substantial improvement in safety profile to narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness patients by reducing the amount of adverse events (AEs) over an 8 hour, 12 hour, 16 hour, 20 hour, 24 hour, and/or 48 hour time period following administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition, as compared to an immediate release sodium oxybate (e.g., Xyrem®) formulation. In particular, the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may result in fewer adverse events and fewer Cmax periods over an 8 hour, 12 hour, 16 hour, 20 hour, 24 hour, and 48 hour time period, as compared to an immediate release sodium oxybate (e.g., Xyrem®) formulation. Since it appears AEs may be closely related to Cmax, by virtue of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition having fewer Cmax periods than Xyrem®, the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may also have fewer AEs over an 8 hour, 12 hour, 16 hour, 20 hour, 24 hour, and/or 48 hour time period, as compared to an immediate release sodium oxybate (e.g., Xyrem®) formulation. Thus, the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition may have a superior safety profile and/or reduced AEs compared to the prior art (e.g., Xyrem®) or any sodium oxybate composition requiring administration more frequently than once-daily.
In yet another embodiment, the compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may yield a similar pharmacokinetic profile compared to an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly at least two hours after eating while potentially giving a reduced dose.
In another embodiment, the compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may allow administration less than two hours after eating compared to the commercial treatment Xyrem®.
In other embodiments, the compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be administered less than two hours after eating, or may be administered in the fed or fasted state, with improved dissolution and pharmacokinetic profiles compared to an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered twice nightly at least two hours after eating.
In an embodiment, the composition provides an AUCinf bioequivalent to an AUCinf of Xyrem® as depicted in
In particular, a 6 g dose of a composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 230 hr*μg/mL, and a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses, where the first dose is administered at least two hours after eating a standardized meal. For example, a 6 g dose of the composition administered less than two hours after eating may have a mean AUCinf of about 242 hr*μg/mL and a mean Cmax of about 64 μg/mL. In addition, a 9 g dose of a composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 400 hr*μg/mL, and a mean Cmax that may be from 50% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses where the first does is administered at least two hours after a standardized meal. This may be seen by comparing the release profiles and pharmacokinetic profiles in Examples 1-7.
The compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may have both immediate release and modified release portions. The release of gamma-hydroxybutyrate from the immediate release portion is practically uninhibited, and occurs almost immediately in 0.1N hydrochloric acid dissolution medium. In contrast, while the modified release portion also may release its gamma-hydroxybutyrate almost immediately when fully triggered, the release is not triggered until a predetermined lag-time or the drug is subjected to a suitable dissolution medium such as a phosphate buffer pH 6.8 dissolution medium. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that food may have no or low impact on the modified release portion of the composition, as the gamma-hydroxybutyrate from the modified release portion is absorbed in the latter part of the gastro-intestinal tract.
Formulations that achieve this improved bioavailability in the fed state may be described using several different pharmacokinetic parameters. An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate includes immediate release and modified release portions, where a 6 g dose of the formulation, when administered less than two hours after eating, may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 230, 240, 245, 300, 325, 340, 375, 400, 425, or 450 hr*microgram/mL. In an embodiment, a 6 g does of the composition has a mean AUCinf of greater than 230 hr*microgram/mL. In an embodiment, a 6 g does of the composition has a mean AUCinf of about 242 hr*microgram/mL. For example, when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating, it achieves a mean AUCinf that is from 50% to 120%, from 60% to 120%, from 70% to 120%, from 75% to 100%, from 80% to 100%, from 80 to 100%, from 90% to 100%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean AUCinf provided by an equal dose of the composition administered at least two hours after eating.
An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate includes immediate release and modified release portions, where a 6 g dose of the formulation, when administered less than two hours after eating, may achieve a mean Cmax of greater than 55, 60, 65, or 70 μg/mL. For example, a 6 g dose of the composition has a mean Cmax of about 64 μg/mL. An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate includes immediate release and modified release portions, where a 6 g dose of the formulation, when administered less than two hours after eating, may achieve a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140%, from 60% to 140%, from 70% to 140%, from 75% to 135%, from 80% to 135%, from 80 to 130%, from 90% to 110%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate (e.g. Xyrem®) administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized meal. In one embodiment, a 6 g dose of the composition has a mean Cmax from 60% to 90%, or from 60% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate (e.g. Xyrem®) administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized meal. In other embodiments, the mean Cmax is from 100% to 150% of the of the mean Cmax of a first peak of the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating and the mean Cmax is from 80% to 100% of the of the mean Cmax of a second peak of the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate includes immediate release and modified release portions, where a 9 g dose of the formulation, when administered less than two hours after eating, may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 350, 400, 450, 500, 525, or 550 hr*microgram/mL. In one embodiment, a 9 g dose of the composition may have a mean AUCinf of greater than 400 hr*microgram/mL.
An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate includes immediate release and modified release portions, where a 9 g dose of the formulation, when administered less than 2 hours after eating, may have a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140%, from 60% to 140%, from 70% to 140%, from 75% to 135%, from 80% to 135%, from 80 to 130%, from 90% to 110%, from 50% to 95%, or from 60% to 90% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate (e.g. Xyrem®) administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized meal. In one embodiment, a 9 g dose of the composition may have a mean Cmax from 60% to 90% or 60% to 120% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate (e.g. Xyrem®) administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after a standardized meal.
An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered at a strength of 6 g less than two hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
Another embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 6 g less than two hours after eating substantially as depicted in
Yet another embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 6 g less than two hours after eating substantially as depicted in
An embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yields a plasma concentration versus time curve when administered once nightly at a strength of 9 g less than two hours after eating substantially as depicted in
Another embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yields an AUC profile when administered once nightly at a strength of 6 g between 0 and 4 hours after eating substantially as depicted in
Yet another embodiment of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate yields a Cmax profile when administered once nightly at a strength of 6 g between 0 and 4 hours after a standardized evening meal substantially as depicted in
‘In any of these embodiments, the formulation may be effective to treat narcolepsy Type 1 or Type 2. The treatment of narcolepsy is defined as reducing excessive daytime sleepiness or reducing the frequency of cataplectic attacks. In various embodiments, the composition is sufficient to be administered once daily. For example, the composition may be sufficient to administer in the morning or at night less than 2 hours after eating a meal. The formulation is also effective to induce sleep for at least 6 to 8 consecutive hours. In one embodiment, the composition administered less than two hours after eating is effective to induce sleep for at least 8 consecutive hours. In various embodiments, the formulation is effective to induce sleep for at least 6 hours, at least 7 hours, at least 8 hours, at least 9 hours, or at least 10 hours. In other embodiments, the formulation is effective to induce sleep for up to 6 hours, up to 7 hours, up to 8 hours, up to 9 hours, or up to 10 hours.
In any of these embodiments, the composition may include immediate release and modified release portions, where the modified release portion includes gamma hydroxybutyrate particles coated by a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C., and the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35. The polymers comprising free carboxylic groups may have a pH dissolution trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and may be methacrylic acid copolymers having a pH dissolution trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97.
Various techniques are known for formulating modified release dosage forms including, for example, the techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,101,209 to Legrand et al. (“Legrand”). Legrand provides a system ensuring that the active ingredient is released with certainty from the modified release dosage form by means of a dual mechanism of “time-dependent” and “pH-dependent” release. Legrand did not describe any dosage forms for delivering sodium oxybate or other forms of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating.
In various embodiments, the composition of any of the embodiments herein may be administered at any meal state. In particular, the composition may be administered in the fed state, at least two hours after eating, or in the fasted state. In one embodiment, the composition is administered in the fed state, which is less than two hours after eating. For example, the composition may be administered while eating, immediately after eating, up to 30 minutes after eating, at least 30 minutes after eating, up to 45 minutes after eating, up to 1 hour after eating, up to 1.25 hours after eating, up to 1.5 hours after eating, up to 1.75 hours after eating, up to 1.8 hours after eating, up to 1.9 hours after eating, or up to 1.95 hours after eating. In some embodiments, the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a standardized evening meal.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; and (c) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include immediate release and modified release portions, a suspending or viscosifying agent, and an acidifying agent, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; and (c) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups having a pH trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating comprises a methacrylic acid copolymer carrying free carboxylic groups having a pH trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In various embodiments, gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be present in the composition as a 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g, or 9.0 g dose. In some embodiments, the dosage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be sufficient to administer the composition once daily.
Pharmacokinetics
As mentioned in the definitions section of this document, each of the sub-embodiments may be used to further characterize and limit each of the foregoing principal embodiments. In addition, more than one of the following sub-embodiments may be combined and used to further characterize and limit each of the foregoing principal embodiments, in any manner that is mathematically and physically possible.
In an embodiment, the oral pharmaceutical composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be in a unit dose suitable for administration less than two hours after eating for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness. Without being limited to a particular theory, the composition may include a modified release portion that delays release of a portion of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate until the composition reaches the small intestine, such that ingestion of food has a limited effect on the absorption of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
In an embodiment, the oral pharmaceutical composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be in a unit dose suitable for administration once daily for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness. In an example, the composition may exhibit rapid initial absorption comparable to twice-nightly IR sodium oxybate. In another example, the composition may demonstrate a lower overall Cmax than twice-nightly IR sodium oxybate. In other examples, the composition may provide mean blood concentrations (ug/ml) at 8 hours similar to that of twice-nightly IR sodium oxybate.
In various embodiments, the composition provides a substantially similar fed state PK profile and 2 hour post meal administration PK profile. In some embodiments, a 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and/or 9 g dose may exhibit a PK profile consistent with those desired for once-nightly dosing. In various embodiments, the composition exhibits pharmacokinetics that are dose proportional when administered once daily, 2 hours post meal. In an embodiment, the composition provides a Cmax that is dose proportional. For example, the composition provides a Cmax that is dose proportional across once daily doses of 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g. In an embodiment, the composition provides an AUC that is dose proportional. For example, the Cmax of a 6 g dose is proportional to the Cmax of a 9 g dose of the composition. In another embodiment, the composition is dose proportional by a factor of about 1 to about 1.3. In an example, the Cmax may be dose proportional by a factor of about 1. In another example, the AUC may be dose proportional by a factor of about 1.3. In some examples, the increase in the AUC may be slightly more than proportional. The composition may exhibit predictable increases in plasma levels with increasing doses, consistent with the PK profile desired for a once-nightly sodium oxybate formulation.
In an embodiment, the once-nightly controlled-release sodium oxybate composition may demonstrate lower overall Cmax and similar total AUC, compared to twice-nightly sodium oxybate. In an embodiment, the once-nightly composition safety profile may be consistent with what is known for sodium oxybate.
In an embodiment, the composition provides no dose dumping. For example, the ingestion of alcohol does not result in an immediate release of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
In another embodiment, there is no significant reduction in safety or efficacy to a patient following administration of the composition less than two hours after eating. In some embodiments, the safety is improved over the administration of Xyrem®, such that the Cmax of the composition is less than the Cmax after administration of the second dose of Xyrem® when administered in the fed state. In other embodiments, the composition is more effective than Xyrem® when administered in the fed state. For example, the Cmax of the composition is higher than the Cmax after administration of the first dose of Xyrem® when administered in the fed state.
In an embodiment, the composition provides an AUCinf bioequivalent to an AUCinf of Xyrem® as depicted in a figure selected from
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 230, 240, 245, 250, 255, 260, 275, 300, 325, or 350 hr*microgram/mL when administered once less than two hours after eating. An upper limit on mean AUCinf for such 6 g dose may be set at 300 or 350 hr*μg/mL. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In additional embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean Cmax of greater than 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, or 90 μg/mL when administered once less than two hours after eating. An upper limit on mean Cmax for such 6 g dose may be set at 75 or 90 μg/mL. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In additional embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140%, from 60% to 140%, from 70 to 140%, from 75% to 135%, from 80% to 135%, or from 80 to 130% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered at t0 and t4h in two equally divided doses administered at least two hours after a standardized meal. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean AUC8 h of greater than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 μg/mL when administered once less than two hours after eating. An upper limit on mean AUC8 h for such 6 g dose may be set at 5 or 6 μg/mL. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean AUC0-8 of greater than 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 300, or 350 hr*μg/mL when administered once less than two hours after eating. An upper limit on mean AUC0-8 for such 6 g dose may be set at 300 or 350 hr*μg/mL. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean AUC0-t of greater than 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 300, or 350 hr*μg/mL when administered once less than two hours after eating. An upper limit on mean AUC0-t for such 6 g dose may be set at 300 or 350 hr*μg/mL. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean % AUC, ext of greater than 0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.3% when administered once less than two hours after eating. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a tmax of greater than 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, or 2.5 hours when administered once less than two hours after eating. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In various embodiments, a 6 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean t1/2 of greater than 0.5, 1, or 1.5 hours when administered once less than two hours after eating. In these embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 6 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In one embodiment, a 6 g dose of the composition administered less than two hours after eating may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 230 hr·μg/mL, and a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
In various embodiments, a 9 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may be characterized as having been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 350, 400, 450, 460, 470, 480, 490, 500, 525, 550, 575, or 600 hr*μg/mL. An upper limit on mean AUCinf for such 9 g dose may be set at 550 or 600 hr*microgram/mL. In these embodiments, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In additional embodiments, a 9 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may be characterized as having a mean Cmax of greater than 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or 100 μg/mL. An upper limit on mean Cmax for such 9 g dose may be set at 125 or 100 μg/mL. In these embodiments, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In additional embodiments, a 9 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may be characterized as having a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 120% or from 60% to 120% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered at t0 and t4h in two equally divided doses administered at least two hours after a standardized meal. In these embodiments, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered less than two hours after eating a meal. For example, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered once daily, in the morning or the evening. In other embodiments, the 9 g dose of the composition may be administered in the fed state.
In one embodiment, a 9 g dose of the composition administered less than two hours after eating may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 500 hr·μg/mL, and a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 120% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after a standardized evening meal.
Still further embodiments may be defined based on a pharmacokinetic comparison of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate to an immediate release solution of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Therefore, in additional embodiments, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may achieve a relative bioavailability (RBA) of greater than 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses administered at least two hours after a standardized meal. For example, a 6 g and 9 g dose of the formulation administered less than two hours after eating may have an RBA of greater than 80%, 85% or 90% when compared to an equal dose of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses administered at least two hours after a standardized meal
The compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may also be defined by the concentration/time curves that they produce when tested according to the Examples. Therefore, in other embodiments, a 6 g or 9 g dose of the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate administered less than two hours after eating may achieve a time/concentration curve substantially as shown in
The compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may also be defined based on the time required to reach maximum blood concentration of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Thus, in additional embodiments, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may achieve a mean Tmax of 0.5 to 2.5 hours. In various embodiments, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may achieve a mean Tmax of about 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, or 2.5 hours when administered less than two hours after eating. A lower limit on the median Tmax in any of the foregoing ranges can alternatively be set at 0.5 or 1.0 hours.
In another embodiment, a 6 g dose of the composition may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 230 hr·μg/mL and a mean Cmax of greater than 60 microgram/mL when administered less than two hours after eating.
In still another embodiment, a 9 g dose of the formulation may achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 400 hr·μg/mL and a mean Cmax of greater than 60 microgram/mL when administered less than two hours after eating.
In an embodiment, 4.5 g, 7.5 g and 9 g doses of the composition may exhibit similar overall mean pharmacokinetics profiles when administered once daily, 2 hours after eating. In some embodiments, 4.5 g, 7.5 g and 9 g doses of the composition may exhibit mean pharmacokinetics profiles as shown in
The compositions of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be provided in any dosage form that is suitable for oral administration, including tablets, capsules, liquids, orally dissolving tablets, and the like. In one embodiment, they are provided as dry particulate formulations (i.e. granules, powders, coated particles, microparticles, pellets, microspheres, etc.), in a sachet or other suitable discreet packaging units. A particulate formulation will be mixed with tap water shortly before administration. In one embodiment, the composition may be mixed with 50 mL water prior to administration. In another embodiment, the composition is an oral pharmaceutical composition.
In various embodiments, the composition includes gamma-hydroxybutyrate present in a unit dose of at least 4.5 g, at least 6.0 g, at least 7.5 g, or at least 9.0 g. In various embodiments, the composition includes gamma-hydroxybutyrate present in a unit dose of more than 4.5 g, more than 6.0 g, more than 7.5 g, or more than 9.0 g. In one embodiment, the formulation includes 6 g gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In another embodiment, the formulation includes 9 g gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
In one embodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; and (b) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35.
In one embodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; and (b) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 40/60 to 60/40.
In another embodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating of said modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; and (c) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35 or 40/60 to 60/40.
In another embodiment, the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating of said modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35 or 40/60 to 60/40; and (e) the film coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the microparticles.
In another embodiment the formulation comprises immediate release and modified release portions, wherein: (a) the modified release portion comprises coated particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate; (b) the coating of said modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups having a pH trigger of from 5.5 to 6.97 and a hydrophobic compound having a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.; (c) the weight ratio of the hydrophobic compound to the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups is from 0.4 to 4; (d) the ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion and the modified release portion is from 10/90 to 65/35 or 40/60 to 60/40; and (e) the coating is from 10 to 50% of the weight of the particles.
In an embodiment, the polymer carrying free carboxylic groups comprises from 100% poly (methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate) 1:1 and 0% poly (methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate) 1:2 to 2% poly (methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate) 1:1 and 98% poly (methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate) 1:2; and the hydrophobic compound comprises hydrogenated vegetable oil.
In an embodiment, the formulation includes excipients to improve the viscosity and the pourability of the mixture of the particulate formulation with tap water. As such, the particulate formulation comprises, besides the immediate release and modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, one or more suspending or viscosifying agents or lubricants.
Suspending or viscosifying agents may be chosen from the group consisting of xanthan gum, medium viscosity sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, mixtures of microcrystalline cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, mixtures of microcrystalline cellulose and guar gum, medium viscosity hydroxyethyl cellulose, agar, sodium alginate, mixtures of sodium alginate and calcium alginate, gellan gum, carrageenan gum grade iota, kappa or lambda, and medium viscosity hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose.
Medium viscosity sodium carboxymethyl cellulose corresponds to grade of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose whose viscosity, for a 2% solution in water at 25° C., is greater than 200 mPa·s and lower than 3100 mPa·s.
Medium viscosity hydroxyethyl cellulose corresponds to a grade of hydroxyethyl cellulose whose viscosity, for a 2% solution in water at 25° C., is greater than 250 mPa·s and lower than 6500 mPa·s. Medium viscosity hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose corresponds to a grade of hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose whose viscosity, for a 2% solution in water at 20° C., is greater than 80 mPa·s. and lower than 3800 mPa·s.
In one embodiment, the suspending or viscosifying agents are xanthan gum, especially Xantural 75™ from Kelco, hydroxyethylcellulose, especially Natrosol 250M™ from Ashland, Kappa carrageenan gum, especially Gelcarin PH812™ from FMC Biopolymer, and lambda carrageenan gum, especially Viscarin PH209™ from FMC Biopolymer.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises from 1 to 15% of viscosifying or suspending agents. In other embodiments, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises viscosifying or suspending agents in an amount from 2 to 10%, from 2 to 5%, or from 2 to 3% of the formulation.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is in the form of a powder that is intended to be dispersed in water prior to administration and further comprises from 1 to 15% of a suspending or viscosifying agent selected from a mixture of xanthan gum, carrageenan gum and hydroxyethylcellulose or xanthan gum and carrageenan gum.
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is in the form of a powder that is intended to be dispersed in water prior to administration and further comprises: from 1.2 to 15% of an acidifying agent selected from malic acid and tartaric acid; and from 1 to 15% of a suspending or viscosifying agent selected from a mixture of xanthan gum, carrageenan gum and hydroxyethylcellulose or xanthan gum and carrageenan gum.
In one embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate comprises about 1% of lambda carrageenan gum or Viscarin PH209™, about 1% of medium viscosity grade of hydroxyethyl cellulose or Natrosol 250M™, and about 0.7% of xanthan gum or Xantural 75™ For a 4.5 g dose unit, these percentages will typically equate to about 50 mg xanthan gum (Xantural 75™), about 75 mg carragenan gum (Viscarin PH209™), and about 75 mg hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrasol 250M™).
Alternative packages of viscosifying or suspending agents, for a 4.5 g dose, include about 50 mg xanthan gum (Xantural 75™) and about 100 mg carragenan gum (Gelcarin PH812™), or about 50 mg xanthan gum (Xantural 75™), about 75 mg hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrasol 250M™), and about 75 mg carragenan gum (Viscarin PH109™).
In an embodiment, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate further comprises a lubricant or a glidant, besides the immediate release and modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In various embodiments, the lubricants and glidants are chosen from the group consisting of salts of stearic acid, in particular magnesium stearate, calcium stearate or zinc stearate, esters of stearic acid, in particular glyceryl monostearate or glyceryl palmitostearate, stearic acid, glycerol behenate, sodium stearyl fumarate, talc, and colloidal silicon dioxide. In one embodiment, the lubricant or glidant is magnesium stearate. The lubricant or glidant may be used in the particulate formulation in an amount of from 0.1 to 5%. In one embodiment, the amount of lubricant or glidant is about 0.5%. For example, the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include about 0.5% of magnesium stearate.
A composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may further include an acidifying agent. The acidifying agent helps to ensure that the release profile of the formulation in 0.1 N HCl will remain substantially unchanged for at least 15 minutes after mixing, which is approximately the maximum length of time a patient might require before consuming the dose after mixing the formulation with tap water.
In one embodiment, the formulation is a powder, and further comprising an acidifying agent and a suspending or viscosifying agent in the weight percentages recited herein.
The acidifying agents may be chosen from the group consisting of malic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, adipic acid, boric acid, maleic acid, phosphoric acid, ascorbic acid, oleic acid, capric acid, caprylic acid, and benzoic acid. In various embodiments, the acidifying agent is present in the formulation from 1.2 to 15%, from 1.2 to 10%, or from 1.2 to 5%. In one embodiment, the acidifying agents are tartaric acid and malic acid. In another embodiment, the acidifying agent is malic acid.
When tartaric acid is employed, it may be employed in an amount of from 1 to 10%, from 2.5 to 7.5%, or about 5%. In various embodiments, the amount of malic acid in the composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is from 1.2 to 15%, from 1.2 to 10%, from 1.2 to 5%, or from 1.6% or 3.2%. In one embodiment, the amount of malic acid in the composition of gamma hydroxybutyrate is about 1.6%.
The composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate includes an immediate release portion and a modified release portion of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and in an embodiment, the formulation is a particulate formulation that includes a plurality of immediate release gamma-hydroxybutyrate particles and a plurality of modified release gamma-hydroxybutyrate particles. The molar ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release and modified release portions ranges from 0.11:1 to 1.86:1, from 0.17:1 to 1.5:1, from 0.25:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.33:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.42:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.53:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.66:1 to 1.22:1, from 0.66:1 to 1.5:1, from 0.8:1 to 1.22:1. In one embodiment, the molar ratio of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release and modified release portions is about 1:1. The molar percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation ranges from 10% to 65%, from 15 to 60%, from 20 to 55%, from 25 to 55%, from 30 to 55%, from 35 to 55%, from 40 to 55%, from 40 to 60%, or from 45 to 55%. In one embodiment, the molar percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation ranges from 40% to 60%. In an embodiment, the molar percentage of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the immediate release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation is about 50%. The molar percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the modified release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation ranges from 90% to 35%, from 85 to 40%, from 80 to 45%, from 75 to 45%, from 70 to 45%, from 65 to 45%, from 60 to 45%, from 60 to 40%, or from 55 to 45%. In an embodiment, the molar percentage of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the modified release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation ranges from 60% to 40%. In one embodiment, the molar ratio of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the modified release portion relative to the total of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the formulation is about 50%. The weight percentage of the IR microparticles relative to the total weight of IR microparticles and MR microparticles ranges from 7.2% to 58.2%, from 11.0% to 52.9%, from 14.9% to 47.8%, from 18.9% to 47.8%, from 23.1% to 47.8%, from 27.4% to 47.8%, from 31.8% to 47.8%, from 31.8% to 52.9%, or from 36.4% to 47.8%. In other embodiments, the weight percentage of the IR microparticles relative to the total weight of IR microparticles and MR microparticles ranges from 5.9% to 63.2%, from 9.1% to 58.1%, from 12.4% to 53.1%, from 19.9% to 53.1%, from 19.6% to 53.1%, from 23.4% to 53.1%, from 27.4% to 53.1%, or from 27.4% to 58.1%. In one embodiment, the weight percentage of the IR microparticles relative to the total weight of IR microparticles and MR microparticles ranges from 31.7% to 53.1%.
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to 450 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to 170 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its sodium oxybate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its sodium oxybate content in modified release particles consisting of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, 16.7% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
In an embodiment, the finished formulation comprises 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in immediate-release particles consisting of 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns and 50% of its gamma-hydroxybutyrate content in modified release particles consisting of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
Other Characteristics of Immediate Release Portion
The immediate release portion of the formulation can take any form capable of achieving an immediate release of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate when ingested. For example, when the formulation is a particulate formulation, the formulation can include unmodified “raw” gamma-hydroxybutyrate, rapidly dissolving gamma-hydroxybutyrate granules, particles or microparticles comprised of a core covered by a gamma-hydroxybutyrate loaded layer containing a binder such as povidone.
The IR granules or particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be made using any manufacturing process suitable to produce the required particles, including:
The immediate release portion of the formulation is in the form of microparticles comprising the immediate release gamma-hydroxybutyrate and optional pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. In an embodiment, the immediate release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate have a volume mean diameter D(4,3) of from 10 to 1000 microns. In other embodiments, the immediate release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate have a volume mean diameter D(4,3) of from 95 to 600 microns. In additional embodiments, the immediate release microparticles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate have a volume mean diameter D(4,3) of from 150 to 400 microns. In one embodiment, their volume mean diameter is about 270 microns.
The immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may include a core and a layer deposited on the core that contains the gamma-hydroxybutyrate. The core may be any particle chosen from the group consisting of:
The core can also comprise other particles of pharmaceutically acceptable excipients such as particles of hydroxypropyl cellulose (such as Klucel™ from Aqualon Hercules), guar gum particles (such as Grinsted™ Guar from Danisco), xanthan particles (such as Xantural™ 180 from CP Kelco).
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the cores are sugar spheres or microcrystalline cellulose spheres, such as Cellets™ 90, Cellets™ 100 or Cellets™ 127 marketed by Pharmatrans, or also Celphere™ CP 203, Celphere™ CP305, Celphere™ SCP 100. In one embodiment, the core is a microcrystalline cellulose sphere. For example, the core may be a Cellets™ 127 from Pharmatrans.
In various embodiments, the core has a mean volume diameter of about 95 to about 450 microns, about 95 to about 170 microns, or about 140 microns.
The layer deposited onto the core comprises the immediate release gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In an embodiment, the layer also comprises a binder, which may be chosen from the group consisting of:
Low molecular weight hydroxypropyl cellulose corresponds to grades of hydroxypropyl cellulose having a molecular weight of less than 800,000 g/mol, less than or equal to 400,000 g/mol, or less than or equal to 100,000 g/mol. Low molecular weight hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (or hypromellose) corresponds to grades of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose the solution viscosity of which, for a 2% solution in water and at 20° C., is less than or equal to 1,000 mPa·s, less than or equal to 100 mPa·s, or less than or equal to 15 mPa·s. Low molecular weight polyvinyl pyrrolidone (or povidone) corresponds to grades of polyvinyl pyrrolidone having a molecular weight of less than or equal to 1,000,000 g/mol, less than or equal to 800,000 g/mol, or less than or equal to 100,000 g/mol.
In some embodiments, the binding agent is chosen from low molecular weight polyvinylpyrrolidone or povidone (for example, Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP), low molecular weight hydroxypropyl cellulose (for example, Klucel™ EF from Aqualon-Hercules), low molecular weight hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or hypromellose (for example, Methocel™ E3 or E5 from Dow) and mixtures thereof.
In one embodiment, the binder is povidone K30 or K29/32, especially Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP. The binder may be present in an amount of 0 to 80%, 0 to 70%, 0 to 60%, 0 to 50%, 0 to 40%, 0 to 30%, 0 to 25%, 0 to 20%, 0 to 15%, 0 to 10%, or from 1 to 9% of binder based on the total weight of the immediate release coating. In an embodiment, the binder is present in an amount of 5% based on the total weight of the immediate release coating. In one embodiment, the amount of binder is 5% of binder over the total mass of gamma-hydroxybutyrate and binder.
The layer deposited on the core can represent at least 10% by weight, and even greater than 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85 or 90% by weight of the total weight of the immediate release particle of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In one embodiment, the layer deposited on the core represents about 85% of the weight of the immediate release particle of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
According to an embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns.
According to yet another embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns.
According to an embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of sodium oxybate, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of potassium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of calcium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another embodiment, the immediate-release particles comprise 80.75% w/w of magnesium salt of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, 4.25% w/w of Povidone K30 and 15% of microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
According to another embodiment, the immediate-release particles are manufactured by dissolving the gamma-hydroxybutyrate and the Povidone K30 in a mixture of water/ethanol 40/60 w/w and spraying the resulting solution onto the surface of the microcrystalline cellulose spheres.
Other Characteristics of Modified Release Portion
The modified release portion may be any formulation that provides the desired in vitro dissolution profile of gamma-hydroxybutyrate. The modified release portion may include modified release particles, obtained by coating immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate with a coating (or coating film) that inhibits the immediate release of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In one sub-embodiment the modified release portion comprises particles comprising: (a) an inert core; (b) a coating; and (c) a layer comprising the gamma hydroxybutyrate interposed between the core and the coating.
In an embodiment, the modified release portion comprises a time-dependent release mechanism and a pH-dependent release mechanism.
In an embodiment, the coating film comprises at least one polymer carrying free carboxylic groups, and at least one hydrophobic compound characterized by a melting point equal or greater than 40° C.
The polymer carrying free carboxylic groups may be selected from: (meth)acrylic acid/alkyl (meth)acrylate copolymers or methacrylic acid and methylmethacrylate copolymers or methacrylic acid and ethyl acrylate copolymers or methacrylic acid copolymers type A, B or C, cellulose derivatives carrying free carboxylic groups, cellulose acetate phthalate, cellulose acetate succinate, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose phthalate, carboxymethylethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate trimellitate, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose acetate succinate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, zein, shellac, alginate and mixtures thereof.
In an embodiment, the methacrylic acid copolymers are chosen from the group consisting of poly (methacrylic acid, methyl methacrylate) 1:1 or Eudragit™ L100 or equivalent, poly (methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate) 1:1 or Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent and poly (methacrylic acid, methyl methacrylate) 1:2 or Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent.
In another embodiment the coating comprises a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups wherein the free carboxylic groups are substantially ionized at pH 7.5.
The hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. may be selected from the group consisting of hydrogenated vegetable oils, vegetable waxes, wax yellow, wax white, wax microcrystalline, lanolin, anhydrous milk fat, hard fat suppository base, lauroyl macrogol glycerides, polyglyceryl diisostearate, diesters or triesters of glycerol with a fatty acid, and mixtures thereof.
In various embodiments, the hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. is chosen from the group of following products: hydrogenated cottonseed oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, hydrogenated palm oil, glyceryl behenate, hydrogenated castor oil, candellila wax, tristearin, tripalmitin, trimyristin, yellow wax, hard fat or fat that is useful as suppository bases, anhydrous dairy fats, lanolin, glyceryl palmitostearate, glyceryl stearate, lauryl macrogol glycerides, polyglyceryl diisostearate, diethylene glycol monostearate, ethylene glycol monostearate, omega 3 fatty acids, and mixtures thereof. For example, the hydrophobic compound may include hydrogenated cottonseed oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, hydrogenated palm oil, glyceryl behenate, hydrogenated castor oil, candelilla wax, tristearin, tripalmitin, trimyristin, beeswax, hydrogenated poly-1 decene, carnauba wax, and mixtures thereof.
In practice, and without this being limiting, the hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. may be chosen from the group of products sold under the following trademarks: Dynasan™, Cutina™, Hydrobase™ Dub™, Castorwax™, Croduret™, Compritol™, Sterotex™, Lubritab™, Apifil™, Akofine™, Softisan™, Hydrocote™, Livopol™, Super Hartolan™, MGLA™, Corona™, Protalan™, Akosoft™, Akosol™, Cremao™, Massupol™, Novata™, Suppocire™, Wecobee™, Witepsol™, Lanolin™, Incromega™, Estaram™, Suppoweiss™, Gelucire™, Precirol™, Emulcire™, Plurol Diisostéarique™, Geleol™, Hydrine™, Monthyle™, Kahlwax™ and mixtures thereof. In an embodiment, the hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. may be chosen from the group of products sold under the following trademarks: Dynasan™P60, Dynasan™114, Dynasan™116, Dynasan™118, Cutina™ HR, Hydrobase™ 66-68, Dub™ HPH, Compritol™ 888, Sterotex™ NF, Sterotex™ K, Lubritab™, and mixtures thereof.
A particularly suitable coating is composed of a mixture of hydrogenated vegetable oil and a methacrylic acid copolymer. The exact structure and amount of each component, and the amount of coating applied to the particle, controls the release rate and release triggers. Eudragit® methacrylic acid copolymers, namely the methacrylic acid—methyl methacrylate copolymers and the methacrylic acid—ethyl acrylate copolymers, have a pH-dependent solubility: typically, the pH triggering the release of the active ingredient from the microparticles is set by the choice and mixture of appropriate Eudragit® polymers. In the case of gamma hydroxybutyrate modified release microparticles, the theoretical pH triggering the release is from 5.5 to 6.97 or from 5.5 to 6.9. By “pH trigger” is meant the minimum pH above which dissolution of the polymer occurs.
In a particular embodiment, the coating comprises a hydrophobic compound with a melting point equal or greater than 40° C. and a polymer carrying free carboxylic groups are present in a weight ratio from 0.4 to 4, from 0.5 to 4, from 0.6 to 2.5, from 0.67 to 2.5, from 0.6 to 2.33, or from 0.67 to 2.33. In one embodiment, the weight ratio is about 1.5.
A particularly suitable coating is composed of a mixture of hydrogenated vegetable oil and a methacrylic acid copolymer with a theoretical pH triggering the release from 6.5 up to 6.97 in a weight ratio from 0.4 to 4, from 0.5 to 4, from 0.6 to 2.5, from 0.67 to 2.5, from 0.6 to 2.33, or from 0.67 to 2.33. In one embodiment, the weight ratio may be about 1.5.
The modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate have a volume mean diameter of from 100 to 1200 microns, from 100 to 500 microns, or from 200 to 800 microns. In one embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate have a volume mean diameter of about 320 microns.
The coating can represent 10 to 50%, 15 to 45%, 20 to 40%, or 25 to 35% by weight of the total weight of the coated modified release particles. In one embodiment, the coating represents 25-30% by weight of the total weight of the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
In an embodiment, the coating layer of the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate is obtained by spraying, in particular in a fluidized bed apparatus, a solution, suspension or dispersion comprising the coating composition as defined previously onto the immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate, in particular the immediate release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate as previously described. In one embodiment, the coating is formed by spraying in a fluidized bed equipped with a Wurster or partition tube and according to an upward spray orientation or bottom spray a solution of the coating excipients in hot isopropyl alcohol.
According to an embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
According to an embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
According to an embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of sodium oxybate.
According to an embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 10.5% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 56.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 18% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 4% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 8% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent), all percentages expressed based on the total weight of the final modified release particles of sodium oxybate.
According to another embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
According to another embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of gamma-hydroxybutyrate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
According to another embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 450 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
According to another embodiment, the modified release particles of gamma-hydroxybutyrate consist of 11.3% w/w of microcrystalline cellulose spheres with a volume mean diameter of about 95 microns to about 170 microns, layered with 60.5% w/w of sodium oxybate mixed with 3.2% w/w of Povidone™ K30 and finally coated with a coating composition consisting of 15% w/w of hydrogenated vegetable oil (Lubritab™ or equivalent), 0.75% of methacrylic acid copolymer type C (Eudragit™ L100-55 or equivalent) and 9.25% of methacrylic acid copolymer type B (Eudragit™ S100 or equivalent).
Packaging
The composition of gamma-hydroxybutyrate may be supplied in sachets or stick-packs comprising a particulate formulation. The sachets may be available in several different doses, comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in amounts equivalents to 0.5 g, 1.0 g, 1.5 g, 3.0 g, 4.5 g, 6.0 g, 7.5 g, 9.0 g, 10.5 g and/or 12 g of sodium oxybate. Depending on the dose required, one or more of these sachets may be opened, and its contents mixed with tap water to provide the nightly dose of gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
Methods of Treatment
Further provided herein is a method of treating a disorder treatable with gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a human subject in need thereof comprising orally administering, less than two hours after eating, a single bedtime daily dose to said human amounts of gamma-hydroxybutyrate equivalent to from 3.0 to 12.0 g of sodium oxybate in the composition. Further provided herein are methods of treating narcolepsy, types 1 and/or 2, by orally administering at bedtime a therapeutically effective amount of a gamma-hydroxybutyrate formulation characterized by the novel gamma-hydroxybutyrate pharmacokinetic properties of the composition when administered less than two hours after eating. In an embodiment, the composition of the present invention is effective to treat narcolepsy Type 1 or Type 2, wherein the treatment of narcolepsy is defined as reducing excessive daytime sleepiness or reducing the frequency of cataplectic attacks. The therapeutically effective amount may include equivalents from 3.0 to 12.0 g of sodium oxybate. In various embodiments, the therapeutically effective amount is 4.5, 6.0, 7.5 or 9.0 g of sodium oxybate. In one embodiment, the therapeutically effective amount is 6 g or 9 g of sodium oxybate. In various embodiments, the formulation includes sodium oxybate present in a unit dose of at least 4.5 g, at least 6.0 g, at least 7.5 g, or at least 9.0 g. The effectiveness of the treatment may be measured by one or any combination of the following criteria:
In an embodiment, the treatment using the composition administered less than two hours after eating is superior, as measured by any one or combination of the foregoing criteria, to an equal dose administered twice nightly of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, with the second dose administered 4 hours after the first dose.
The invention further provides a method of treatment of narcolepsy Type 1 or Type 2 wherein, compared to a dosing regimen consisting of administering half the dose at t0 and another half of the dose at t4 h of an immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate, a single bedtime daily dose administration of a therapeutically effective amount of the formulation of the invention has been shown to produce less confusion, less depressive syndrome, less incontinence, less nausea or less sleepwalking.
Tables 1a-1d provide the qualitative and quantitative compositions of sodium oxybate IR microparticles, MR microparticles, and mixtures of IR and MR microparticles. The physical structure of the microparticles showing the qualitative and quantitative composition of the IR and MR microparticles is depicted in
Briefly, sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticles were prepared as follows: 1615.0 g of sodium oxybate and 85.0 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Povidone K30-Plasdone™ K29/32 from ISP) were solubilized in 1894.3 g of absolute ethyl alcohol and 1262.9 g of water. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 300 g of microcrystalline cellulose spheres (Cellets™ 127) in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. IR Microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 270 microns were obtained.
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared as follows: 22.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type C (Eudragit™ L100-55), 45.8 g of methacrylic acid copolymer Type B (Eudragit™ S100), 102.9 g of hydrogenated cottonseed oil (Lubritab™), were dissolved in 1542.9 g of isopropanol at 78° C. The solution was sprayed entirely onto 400.0 g of the sodium oxybate IR microparticles described above in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus with an inlet temperature of 48° C., spraying rate around 11 g per min and atomization pressure of 1.3 bar. MR microparticles were dried for two hours with inlet temperature set to 56° C. MR microparticles with mean volume diameter of about 320 microns were obtained.
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles calculated on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 353.36 g of the above IR microparticles, 504.80 g of the above MR microparticles, 14.27 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 6.34 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 9.51 g of carrageenan gum (Viscarin™ PH209 from FMC Biopolymer), 9.51 g of hydroxyethylcellulose (Natrosol™ 250 M from Ashland) and 4.51 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.11 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose as immediate-release fraction and half of the dose as modified release fraction) were weighed.
An alternative formulation to the formulation described in Example 1 is described in Example 1 bis.
Sodium oxybate immediate release (IR) microparticles were prepared by coating the IR microparticles described in Example 1 with a top coat layer. Microparticles were prepared as follows: 170.0 of hydroxypropyl cellulose (Klucel™ EF Pharm from Hercules) were solubilized in 4080.0 g of acetone. The solution was entirely sprayed onto 1530.0 g of the IR microparticles of Example 1 in a fluid bed spray coater apparatus. IR Microparticles with volume mean diameter of about 298 microns were obtained (see Table 1 bis-a).
Sodium oxybate modified release (MR) microparticles were prepared as described in example 1 (see Table 1b).
The finished composition, which contains a 50:50 mixture of MR and IR microparticles based on their sodium oxybate content, was prepared as follows: 412.22 g of the above IR microparticles, 530.00 g of the above MR microparticles, 29.96 g of malic acid (D/L malic acid), 4.96 g of xanthan gum (Xantural™ 75 from Kelco), 4.96 g of colloidal silicon dioxide (Aerosil™ 200 from Degussa) and 9.92 g of magnesium stearate were mixed. Individual samples of 7.45 g (corresponding to a 4.5 g dose of sodium oxybate with half of the dose in an immediate-release fraction and half of the dose in a modified release fraction) were weighed (see Table 1bis-b and 1bis-c).
Compared to the finished composition described in Example 1, this alternative composition has the following characteristics: same MR microparticles, same IR microparticles but with a top coat, increased amount of malic acid, only one suspending agent (xanthan gum) and presence of a glidant.
Pharmacokinetic testing was undertaken in vivo in healthy human volunteers. A test product with the finished composition of Example 1 (FT218) and manufactured at larger scale was administered as a 6 g dose. FT218 was administered to 16 healthy volunteers and a first group of n=14 was administered FT218 in the fed state and a second group of n=13 was administered FT218 in the fasted state. The tested samples were manufactured as described in Table 1c for 4.5 g and quantities were hypothetically adjusted to a 6 g dose. The concentration versus time curve of FT218 in the fed and fasted state are presented in
To illustrate the effect of food on FT218 and the IR and MR portions of FT218 for a 9 g dosage, concentration versus time curves were simulated.
The effect of food on FT218 and Xyrem® is shown in
ameans of study OMC-SXB-8 are presented.
To compare the effect of food on FT218 and Xyrem® in the fed state, 2 hours post-meal, and in the fasted state, the concentration versus time curves for a 3 g dose of Xyrem® administered twice and a single 6 g dose of FT218 were plotted together.
As seen in
The impact of the food effect of FT218 is likely reduced on Cmax and AUCs compared to Xyrem® at the same dose based on food effect and dose proportionality data. The predictability of FT218 may be better than Xyrem®. Table 5 provides expected PK parameters for Xyrem® (2×3 g dose) and FT218 (6 g dose) in the fed state, two hours post-meal, and in the fasted state.
To compare the anticipated effect of food on FT218 and Xyrem® in the fed state, 2 hours post-meal, and in the fasted state, the concentration versus time curves for a 4.5 g dose of Xyrem® administered twice and a single 9 g dose of FT218 were plotted together.
The FT218 mean concentration-time profile is the observed data of the dose proportionality study at 9 g 2 hours post-meal. As seen in
The impact of the food effect of FT218 is likely reduced on Cmax and AUCs compared to Xyrem® at the same dose based on food effect and dose proportionality data. The predictability of FT218 may be better than Xyrem®. Table 6 provides expected PK parameters for Xyrem® (2×4.5 g dose) and FT218 (9 g dose) in the fed state, two hours post-meal, and in the fasted state.
To compare the effect on dosing time, AUC and Cmax for 6 g of FT218 and Xyrem® were plotted over a period of time after eating a meal.
To assess the PK of FT218 given as a single dose of 4.5 g, 7.5 g and 9 g, compare PK parameters at the 3 doses, and estimate the dose proportionality, an open-label, single-dose, 3-sequential period study in 20 healthy volunteers was performed. Subjects received 3 separate single-dose (without titration) administrations of FT218 at bedtime, two hours post-evening meal, in a sequential order of 4.5 g, 7.5 g and 9 g with a minimum 7-day washout between doses. Dose proportionality between the three doses was assessed using the power method. Sensitivity analyses were performed using ANOVA.
Variability of concentrations of FT218 and twice-nightly sodium oxybate IR at 8 h and 10 h post-dose (when patients typically awaken) in the PK pilot and the present study were compared in terms of standard deviation.
The study was conducted in 20 healthy volunteers (12 males and 8 females). All subjects completed periods 1 (4.5 g) and 2 (7.5 g), while 12 subjects completed period 3 (9 g).
For the 3 doses, mean pharmacokinetics exhibited similar overall profiles with median Tmax between 1.5 and 2 hours (
Table 7 provides variability of concentrations at 8 h and 10 h post-dose for twice-nightly sodium oxybate and FT218 in the PK pilot and dose proportionality studies.
Mean concentrations at 8 h and 10 h post-dose for FT218 are at least as low as twice-nightly sodium oxybate IR, regardless of the rule used to handle concentrations below quantitation limit (Table 7). Moreover, the variability of the concentrations was similar.
Applying the power method, the slope estimate for Cmax was 1.02 and the confidence interval centered on 1.00 (90% CI: 0.76-1.28). For AUCinf, the estimate was 1.34 (90% CI: 1.19-1.48), indicating that the increase in the AUC is slightly more than proportional. These results were consistent with ANOVA sensitivity analysis results.
Thirteen subjects (65%) reported a total of 31 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 8 TEAEs (mainly headache 5/8) were experienced by 7/20 (35%) subjects during the 4.5 g period. 7 TEAEs (mainly gastrointestinal disorders 4/7) were experienced by 4/20 (20%) subjects during the 7.5 g period. 16 TEAEs (mainly gastrointestinal disorders 8/16) were experienced by 6/12 (50%) subjects during the 9 g period. One of these, a nervous system disorder (sedation) was a SAE. The intensity of TEAEs was judged severe for 2/31 TEAEs (both in 9 g period), moderate for 10/31 (4 in 4.5 g period, 3 in 7.5 g period and 3 in 9 g period) and mild for 19/31. All the TEAEs were resolved before the end of the study.
FT218 achieved blood-level profiles, when given at bedtime, consistent with a single CR dose. Dose proportionality was maintained for Cmax across the dosage range. The safety profile was consistent with what is known for sodium oxybate and most AEs were mild to moderate in severity even without titration.
Table 8 provides a summary of the TEAEs in the fed and fasted states for a 6 g dose of FT218.
As can be seen from Table 8, administration of 6 g FT218 in the fed state results in fewer TEAEs than 6 g FT218 administered in the fasted state.
Moreover, the pharmacokinetic-adverse event (AE) relationship for FT218 was evaluated. A total of 129 healthy volunteers received single doses of FT218 between 4.5-9 g. Six single-dose, randomized, crossover studies that assessed the pharmacokinetics of FT218 at 4.5, 6, 7.5 and 9 g in healthy volunteers were used. Lattice plots, “spaghetti” plots, and scatter plots of individual gamma hydroxybutyrate concentrations and indicators when AEs by system, organ, or class (SOC) were created to determine any PK-AE relationship.
Most AEs, specifically for the neurological and gastrointestinal SOC, occurred close to Tmax, during the Cmax period, which for FT218 was around 1.5-2 hours after dosing. These AEs were known AEs associated with sodium oxybate. There appeared to be no clear correlation between individual plasma GHB concentrations levels and AEs between subjects. Individual AEs were equally distributed above and below the mean population Cmax and AUCinf for the dataset.
Throughout this application, various publications are referenced. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Numerous examples are provided herein to enhance the understanding of the present disclosure. In this regard, a specific set of statements are provided below characterizing various examples of oral pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treatment described herein.
Statement 1: An oral pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration less than two hours after eating.
Statement 2: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 1, wherein the composition is suitable for administrating with food, immediately after eating, up to 30 minutes after eating, up to 1 hour after eating, up to 1.5 hours after eating, or up to 2 hours after eating.
Statement 3: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statements 1 or 2, wherein the composition is administered once daily.
Statement 4: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition is suitable for administration in the evening.
Statement 5: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 1-3, wherein the composition is suitable for administration in the morning.
Statement 6: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition comprises gamma-hydroxybutyrate in an extended release or delayed release formulation.
Statement 7: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 1-5, wherein the composition comprises gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a modified release formulation.
Statement 8: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a substantially similar fed state PK profile and 2 hour post meal administration PK profile.
Statement 9: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating.
Statement 10: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 11: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 80%-95% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 12: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 85%-90% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 13: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating.
Statement 14: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 15: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 55%-80% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 16: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 60%-75% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 17: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is dose proportional.
Statement 18: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides no dose dumping.
Statement 19: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein there is no significant reduction in safety or efficacy to a patient following administration.
Statement 20: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides an AUCinf bioequivalent to an AUCinf of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 21: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 22: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 23: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is 10-60% less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 24: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is 10-60% less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 25: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a change in Cmax between when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating and when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating that is 10-60% less than the change in Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 26: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides a change in Cmax between when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating and when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating that is 10-60% less than the change in Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 27: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides an AUC that is more dose proportional than the AUC of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 28: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of the preceding Statements, wherein the composition provides an AUC that is more dose proportional than the AUC of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 29: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 20-28, wherein the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses is Xyrem®.
Statement 30: An oral pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose, wherein the absorption of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the gastro-intestinal tract is not substantially changed by the presence of food.
Statement 31: An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration less than two hours after eating.
Statement 32: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 31, wherein the composition comprises gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a modified release formulation.
Statement 33: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statements 31 or 32, wherein the formulation is administered during, immediately after, up to 30 minutes after eating, up to 1 hour after eating, up to 1.5 hours after eating, or up to 2 hours after eating.
Statement 34: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 31-33, wherein the composition is suitable for once-daily administration.
Statement 35: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 31-34, wherein the composition is suitable for administration in the evening.
Statement 36: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 31-34, wherein the composition is suitable for administration in the morning.
Statement 37: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 31-36, wherein the composition is effective to induce sleep for at least eight consecutive hours.
Statement 38: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 31-37, wherein a 6 g dose of the composition administered less than two hours after eating has a mean AUCinf of greater than 230 hr*μg/mL, and a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 39: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 38, wherein the mean Cmax is from 80% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 40: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 38, wherein the mean Cmax is from 100% to 150% of the of the mean Cmax of a first peak of the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 41: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 38, wherein the mean Cmax is from 80% to 100% of the of the mean Cmax of a second peak of the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 42: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 38, wherein the mean Cmax is about 50 μg/mL to about 82 μg/mL.
Statement 43: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 42, wherein the mean Cmax is about 64 μg/mL.
Statement 44: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 38, wherein the mean AUCinf is about 242 hr*μg/mL when the formulation is administered about 30 minutes after eating.
Statement 45: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 38, wherein the mean AUCinf is about 273 hr*μg/mL when the formulation is administered about 2 hours after eating.
Statement 46: A method of treating narcolepsy and associated disorders and symptoms in a patient in need thereof comprising: administering an oral pharmaceutical composition comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate less than two hours after eating.
Statement 47: The method of Statement 46, wherein the composition is administered once-daily.
Statement 48: The method of Statement 47, wherein the composition is administered after eating in the evening.
Statement 49: The method of Statement 47, wherein the composition is administered after eating in the morning.
Statement 50: The method of any one of Statements 46-49, wherein the composition is administered during, immediately after eating, up to 30 minutes after eating, up to 1 hour after eating, up to 1.5 hours after eating, or up to 2 hours after eating.
Statement 51: The method of any one of Statements 46-50, wherein the composition is effective to induce sleep for at least six consecutive hours.
Statement 52: The method of any one of Statements 46-51, wherein the composition is effective to induce sleep for at least eight consecutive hours.
Statement 53: The method of any one of Statements 46-52, wherein the composition is effective to induce sleep for at least ten consecutive hours.
Statement 54: The method of any one of Statements 46-53, wherein the composition comprises gamma-hydroxybutyrate in an extended release or delayed release formulation.
Statement 55: The method of any one of Statements 46-53, wherein the composition comprises gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a modified release formulation.
Statement 56: The method of any one of Statements 46-55, wherein the composition provides a substantially similar fed state PK profile and 2 hour post meal administration PK profile.
Statement 57: The method of any one of Statements 46-56, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating.
Statement 58: The method of any one of Statements 46-57, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 59: The method of any one of Statements 46-58, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 80%-95% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 60: The method of any one of Statements 46-59, wherein the composition provides a mean AUCinf when administered less than two hour after eating that is 85%-90% of the mean AUCinf when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 61: The method of any one of Statements 46-60, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating.
Statement 62: The method of any one of Statements 46-61, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 50%-120% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 63: The method of any one of Statements 46-62, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 55%-80% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 64: The method of any one of Statements 46-63, wherein the composition provides a mean Cmax when administered less than two hour after eating that is 60%-75% of the mean Cmax when the composition is administered while fasting.
Statement 65: The method of any one of Statements 46-64, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is dose proportional.
Statement 66: The method of any one of Statements 46-65, wherein the composition provides no dose dumping.
Statement 67: The method of any one of Statements 46-66, wherein there is no significant reduction in safety or efficacy to a patient following administration.
Statement 68: The method of any one of Statements 46-67, wherein the composition provides an AUCinf bioequivalent to an AUCinf of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 69: The method of any one of Statements 46-68, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 70: The method of any one of Statements 46-69, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 71: The method of any one of Statements 46-70, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is 10-60% less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 72: The method of any one of Statements 46-71, wherein the composition provides a Cmax that is 10-60% less than the Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 73: The method of any one of Statements 46-72, wherein the composition provides a change in Cmax between when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating and when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating that is 10-60% less than the change in Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 74: The method of any one of Statements 46-73, wherein the composition provides a change in Cmax between when the composition is administered at least two hours after eating and when the composition is administered less than two hours after eating that is 10-60% less than the change in Cmax of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses less than two hours after eating.
Statement 75: The method of any one of Statements 46-74, wherein the composition provides an AUC that is more dose proportional than the AUC of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 76: The method of any one of Statements 46-75, wherein the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses is Xyrem®.
Statement 77: The method of any one of Statements 46-76, wherein a 6 g dose of the composition administered has been shown to achieve a mean AUCinf of greater than 230 hr*μg/mL, and a mean Cmax that is from 50% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 78: The method of Statement 77, wherein the mean Cmax is from 80% to 140% of the mean Cmax provided by an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after eating.
Statement 79: The method of any one of Statements 77-78, wherein the mean Cmax is from 100% to 150% of the of the mean Cmax of a first peak of the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses at least two hours after eating.
Statement 80: The method of any one of Statements 77-79, wherein the mean Cmax is from 80% to 100% of the of the mean Cmax of a second peak of the equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses approximately two hours after eating.
Statement 81: The method of any one of Statements 77-80, wherein the mean Cmax is about 50 μg/mL to about 82 μg/mL.
Statement 82: The method of Statement 81, wherein the mean Cmax is about 64 μg/mL.
Statement 83: The method of any one of Statements 77-82, wherein the mean AUCinf is about 242 hr*μg/mL when the formulation is administered about 30 minutes after eating.
Statement 84: The method of any one of Statements 77-82, wherein the mean AUCinf is about 273 hr*μg/mL when the formulation is administered about 2 hours after eating.
Statement 85: An oral pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration once daily, wherein the composition is dose proportional.
Statement 86: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 85, wherein the composition is suitable for administration in the evening.
Statement 87: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 85, wherein the composition is suitable for administration in the morning.
Statement 88: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 85-87, wherein the composition is dose proportional across 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g doses of the composition.
Statement 89: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 85-88, wherein the Cmax of the composition is proportional across 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g doses of the composition.
Statement 90: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 85-89, wherein the composition is dose proportional by a factor of 1 to 1.3.
Statement 91: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 88-90, wherein median Tmax is between about 1.5 and 2 hours across the increasing doses.
Statement 92: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 88-97, wherein the mean Cmax is between about 42.9 and 84.5 μg/mL across the increasing doses.
Statement 93: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 88-92, wherein the mean AUCinf is about 191, 358 and 443 μg·h/mL for the 4.5, 7.5 and 9 g doses respectively.
Statement 94: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 88-93, wherein the mean concentrations at 8 hours are about 4.8, 19.7 and 25.5 μg/mL for the 4.5, 7.5 and 9 g doses respectively.
Statement 95: A method of treating narcolepsy and associated disorders and symptoms in a patient in need thereof comprising: administering an oral pharmaceutical composition comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate once daily, wherein the composition is dose proportional.
Statement 96: The method of Statement 95, wherein the composition is administered in the evening.
Statement 97: The method of Statement 95, wherein the composition is administered in the morning.
Statement 98: The method of any one of Statements 95-97, wherein the composition is dose proportional across 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g doses of the composition.
Statement 99: The method of any one of Statements 95-98, wherein the Cmax of the composition is proportional across 4.5 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g doses of the composition.
Statement 100: The method of any one of Statements 95-99, wherein the composition is dose proportional by a factor of 1 to 1.3.
Statement 101: The method of any one of Statements 98-100, wherein median Tmax is between about 1.5 and 2 hours across the increasing doses.
Statement 102: The method of any one of Statements 98-101, wherein the mean Cmax is between about 42.9 and 84.5 μg/mL across the increasing doses.
Statement 103: The method of any one of Statements 98-102, wherein the mean AUCinf is about 191, 358 and 443 μg·h/mL for the 4.5, 7.5 and 9 g doses respectively.
Statement 104: The method of any one of Statements 98-103, wherein the mean concentrations at 8 hours are about 4.8, 19.7 and 25.5 μg/mL for the 4.5, 7.5 and 9 g doses respectively.
Statement 105: An oral pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate in a unit dose suitable for administration once daily, wherein most adverse events (AEs) occur close to Tmax, during the Cmax period.
Statement 106: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statement 105, wherein most AEs occur 1.5-2 hours after dosing.
Statement 107: The oral pharmaceutical composition of Statements 105 or 106, wherein administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition less than two hours after eating results in fewer AEs than administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition at least two hours after eating.
Statement 108: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 105-107, wherein the oral pharmaceutical composition has a more favorable safety profile as compared to an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses.
Statement 109: The oral pharmaceutical composition of any one of Statements 105-108, wherein administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition once daily results in fewer AEs than administration of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses.
Statement 110: A method of treating narcolepsy and associated disorders and symptoms in a patient in need thereof comprising: administering an oral pharmaceutical composition comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate once daily, wherein most AEs occur close to Tmax, during the Cmax period.
Statement 111: The method of Statement 110, wherein most AEs occur 1.5-2 hours after dosing.
Statement 112: The method of Statements 110 or 111, wherein administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition less than two hours after eating results in fewer AEs than administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition at least two hours after eating.
Statement 113: The method of any one of Statements 110-112, wherein the oral pharmaceutical composition has a more favorable safety profile as compared to an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses.
Statement 114: The method of any one of Statements 110-113, wherein administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition once daily results in fewer AEs than administration of an equal dose of immediate release liquid solution of sodium oxybate administered at t0 and t4h in equally divided doses.
Statement 115: The method of any one of Statements 110-114, wherein the amount of AEs are reduced over an 8 hour, 12 hour, 16 hour, 20 hour, 24 hour, and/or 48 hour time period following administration of the oral pharmaceutical composition, as compared to an equal dose of an immediate release sodium oxybate formulation administered more frequently than once-daily.
Statement 116: A method of reducing the amount of adverse events (AEs) in a patient with narcolepsy, cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness comprising: administering an oral pharmaceutical composition comprising gamma-hydroxybutyrate once daily, wherein the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition has fewer Cmax periods than an equal dose of immediate release sodium oxybate formulation administered more frequently than once-daily.
Statement 117: The method of Statement 116, wherein administration of the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition results in fewer adverse events and fewer Cmax periods over an 8 hour, 12 hour, 16 hour, 20 hour, 24 hour, and/or 48 hour time period, as compared to the immediate release sodium oxybate formulation administered more frequently than once-daily.
Statement 118: The method of Statements 116 or 117, wherein the gamma-hydroxybutyrate composition has a superior safety profile compared to the immediate release sodium oxybate formulation administered more frequently than once-daily.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/812,699, filed Mar. 1, 2019 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/857,008, filed Jun. 4, 2019.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3051619 | Marie et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
3419588 | De Man et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
4221778 | Raghunathan | Sep 1980 | A |
4374441 | Carter et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4393236 | Klosa | Jul 1983 | A |
4510128 | Khanna | Apr 1985 | A |
4524217 | Davenport et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4687662 | Schobel | Aug 1987 | A |
4738985 | Kluger et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4916161 | Patell | Apr 1990 | A |
4939949 | Langenberg | Jul 1990 | A |
4983632 | Gessa et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5294430 | Borch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5326856 | Coughlin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5364842 | Justice et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380937 | Koehler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5415870 | Gergely et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424218 | Miljanich et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426120 | Crepaldi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5449761 | Belinka, Jr. et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5527885 | Coughlin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5578288 | Belinka, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578484 | Horoszewicz | Nov 1996 | A |
5585468 | Coughlin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587454 | Justice et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593656 | Belinka, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594030 | Conte et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5753708 | Koehler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758095 | Albaum et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763202 | Horoszewicz | Jun 1998 | A |
5795864 | Amstutz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5833599 | Schrier et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840331 | Van Cauter et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845255 | Mayaud | Dec 1998 | A |
5891849 | Amstutz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5955106 | Moeckel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5990162 | Scharf | Nov 1999 | A |
6014631 | Teagarden et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022562 | Autant et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6054429 | Bowersox et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067524 | Byerly et al. | May 2000 | A |
6112182 | Akers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6184205 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6255307 | Cox et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317719 | Schrier et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322819 | Burnside et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356873 | Teagarden et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361938 | O'Mahony et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384020 | Flanner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432920 | Sparks et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436430 | Mulye | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436998 | Cacciaglia et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461197 | Crane, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6472431 | Cook et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6472432 | Perricone | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6495598 | Yoneda et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6565872 | Wu et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6599905 | Cox et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6638522 | Mulye | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6699973 | O'Mahony et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6703362 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6780889 | Cook et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6803464 | Edney et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6913768 | Couch | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7015200 | Mamelak et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7072840 | Mayaud | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7135457 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7238367 | Tardi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7262219 | Cook et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7268109 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7524812 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7566766 | O'Mahony et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568822 | Ibrahim | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7572605 | Mamelak et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7668730 | Reardan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683024 | Chan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709445 | Soula et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744921 | Tardi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7765106 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765107 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7797171 | Reardon | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7833973 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842676 | Janoff et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850090 | Ollendick | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7851506 | Cook et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7879362 | Castan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895059 | Reardan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906145 | Castan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7956030 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7977307 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8022279 | Mayer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8062667 | Mehta et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084045 | Pouliquen et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092828 | Louie et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101209 | Legrand | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8193211 | Liang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202537 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202542 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8263125 | Vaya et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8263650 | Cook et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268774 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287848 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287903 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8324275 | Cook et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337890 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8431806 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445023 | Guimberteau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457988 | Reardan et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8461197 | Tung | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8461203 | Cook et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8465765 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8486924 | Ansell et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491935 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8507003 | Jorda et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512688 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513198 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518437 | Tardi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529954 | Lebon et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8563033 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8589182 | Reardan et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8591922 | Allphin et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8597684 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8598191 | Liang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8609651 | Jamieson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623409 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8652523 | Guimberteau et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8652529 | Guimberteau et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8653033 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8679540 | Bonnet-Gonnet et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680228 | Guo et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8707348 | Sakhartov et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716279 | Jamieson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731963 | Reardon | May 2014 | B1 |
8734850 | Castan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8747902 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8759394 | Tung | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8765178 | Parikh et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8765680 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8771735 | Rourke | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8772306 | Eller | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8778301 | Mamelak | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8778390 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8778398 | Rourke | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790700 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8821935 | Guimberteau et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8859619 | Cook | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8883217 | Mehta et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8901173 | Allphin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8916202 | Lebon et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8952029 | Eller | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8952062 | Cook et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956649 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8999386 | Tu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
8999392 | Suplie et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023400 | Guimberteau et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9040083 | Mehta et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9050302 | Eller | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9132107 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9180100 | Tu et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9180104 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9198864 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226910 | Khayrallah et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9271931 | Tardi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295642 | Tu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9359290 | Khayrallah et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9408823 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9427429 | Gray | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9486426 | Eller | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9522191 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9539330 | Cook et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9545399 | Tu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549989 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9555017 | Allphin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561179 | Castan et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9585863 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9649291 | Khayrallah et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9675703 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9675704 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9707270 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9770514 | Ghebre-Sellassie et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9795567 | Rourke et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9801852 | Allphin | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9814684 | Castan et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844544 | Tu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844545 | Tu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
RE46686 | Bonnet-Gonnet et al. | Jan 2018 | E |
9867797 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9920311 | Abribat | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9943488 | Suplie et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10004693 | Castan et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10028912 | Cabral-Lilly et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10052289 | Meyrueix et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10058507 | Tardi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
RE47084 | Castan et al. | Oct 2018 | E |
10086087 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092511 | Castan et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10105341 | Khayrallah et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10172958 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10174302 | Friedrich et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10183939 | Bingham et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10195151 | Allphin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10195168 | Allphin et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10213400 | Eller | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10259780 | Khayrallah et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10272062 | Megret | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10307463 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10398662 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10457627 | Xiang | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10501401 | Xiang | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10507203 | Tu et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10512609 | Allphin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10618886 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10640451 | Xiang | May 2020 | B2 |
10640476 | Xiang et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10668163 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10675258 | Allphin et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10683262 | Xiang et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10710958 | Hurley et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10730853 | Xiang et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10736866 | Megret et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10758488 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10774031 | Xiang | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10813885 | Allphin et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10829443 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10836714 | Xiang et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10857143 | Tu et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10858394 | Xiang et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10864181 | Eller | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10882832 | Xiang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10889572 | Xiang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10903276 | Chan et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10905775 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10912754 | Carter et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10925844 | Grassot | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10933143 | Mehta et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10940133 | Zomorodi | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10941107 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10952986 | Megret et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10959956 | Allphin et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10959976 | Carter et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10966931 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10968202 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10973795 | Megret et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10987310 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11000498 | Megret | May 2021 | B2 |
11033530 | Allphin | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11046946 | Abribat | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11072579 | Khayrallah et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11077079 | Allphin et al. | Aug 2021 | B1 |
11090269 | Allphin et al. | Aug 2021 | B1 |
20020077334 | Cook | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030091632 | Campbell | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030180249 | Khanna et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040092455 | Mamelak | May 2004 | A1 |
20050031688 | Ayala | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037077 | Legrand et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050113366 | Bourguignon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142192 | Benjamin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050158384 | Couch | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181050 | Hirsh | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050239838 | Edgar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244496 | Campbell | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060018933 | Vaya | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024365 | Vaya et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069040 | Mamelak | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078614 | Venkatesh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060182805 | Pfeiffer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204575 | Feng | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210630 | Liang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228410 | Dumont et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070270491 | Cook | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003267 | Spencer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004329 | Jamieson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020039 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080069871 | Vaughn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085304 | Baichwal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080118571 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146549 | Coleman | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226564 | Weers et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080292700 | Nghiem et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293698 | Johnson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090137565 | Frucht | May 2009 | A1 |
20090155357 | Muhuri | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090220611 | Dargelas | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090317355 | Roth et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100112056 | Rourke et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100159001 | Cardinal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160363 | Cardinal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172989 | Roth et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100266701 | Guimberteau et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110034727 | Luchi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110039929 | Cook | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110091537 | Castan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110111027 | Rourke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119085 | Reardan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110213004 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213298 | Pinnisi | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223241 | Tardi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110293729 | Lebon et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120020833 | Cook | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120076865 | Allphin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120148672 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164228 | Suplie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120202879 | Cook | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202880 | Cook | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207843 | Lebon et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130012565 | Tung et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130064814 | Gray | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130143965 | Cook et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130230587 | Pilgaonkar et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267595 | Cook et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130273159 | Howard et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130337078 | Mayer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140004202 | Suplie et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140037745 | Liang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140072624 | Jung et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140093578 | Mehta et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140127306 | Mehta et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141090 | Wilson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140171506 | Allphin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188504 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207480 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207481 | Reardan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140231300 | Mogna | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140256709 | Glozman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140271896 | Abu Shmeis et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140294916 | Tu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296830 | Gibson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316796 | Cox | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140348917 | Rourke | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140371153 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005334 | Shah et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150018414 | Khayrallah et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150073052 | Cook | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150182469 | Mehta et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150328168 | Daviaud-Venet et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160058704 | Tardi et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160068463 | Peoples et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160143854 | Tu et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160154947 | Reardan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180058 | Reardan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160228379 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160271070 | Singh et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160310478 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160326086 | Tung et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338966 | Guimberteau et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346200 | Sommer et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160346216 | Chen | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170042873 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170042874 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170119627 | Bhargava et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170224825 | Cook et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170319566 | Tu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340519 | Bhargava et al. | Nov 2017 | A9 |
20180000954 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180008539 | Singh et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180021284 | Megret et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180042855 | Rourke et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180193277 | Suplie | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180200221 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180228822 | Krouse et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180263936 | Allphin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180280357 | Maricich | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180318222 | Allphin | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180346900 | Abribat | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190015389 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190099395 | Khayrallah et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190151460 | Mehta et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190169589 | Friedrich et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183806 | Guillard | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190183836 | Megret | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190194120 | Xiang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190218168 | Xiang et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190269640 | Megret | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190269641 | Megret | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190274990 | Megret | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190282532 | Megret | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190328882 | Cook et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200085748 | Allphin et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200113840 | Allphin | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200113853 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200163926 | Nelson et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200163943 | Maricich et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200197347 | Megret | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200197377 | Maricich | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200239416 | Xiang et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200261489 | Dimitrova et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200276142 | Grassot | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200290955 | Hurley et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200330393 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200338029 | Allphin et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200360293 | Guillard | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200360319 | Grassot et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200368187 | Grassot et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200369599 | Xiang et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200375995 | Sudhakar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200385367 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210015744 | Jain et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210015745 | Jain et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210020317 | Lillaney et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210032199 | Xiang et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210038588 | Tu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210038734 | Mehta et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210047367 | Xiang et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210053912 | Hurley | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210061791 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210069105 | Jain et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210069136 | Jain et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210077450 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210087177 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210093575 | Rourke et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210093603 | Hurley | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210093623 | Tu et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210094925 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210121423 | Allphin et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210128502 | Eller | May 2021 | A1 |
20210162055 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210186907 | Skobieranda | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210187004 | McMahon et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210205227 | Allphin et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210205257 | Carter et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210212970 | Eller | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210213007 | Tu et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210244670 | Allphin et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20220016066 | Megret et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
062556 | Nov 2008 | AR |
063201 | Jan 2009 | AR |
109376 | Nov 2018 | AR |
112403 | Oct 2019 | AR |
536867 | Dec 2011 | AT |
775523 | Aug 2004 | AU |
2007269896 | Jan 2008 | AU |
2006214454 | May 2011 | AU |
2007290589 | Apr 2012 | AU |
2011359405 | Aug 2013 | AU |
2011232408 | Jul 2015 | AU |
2007227569 | Apr 2016 | AU |
2010352575 | Nov 2016 | AU |
2013359114 | Jan 2017 | AU |
2013302657 | Aug 2018 | AU |
2014248849 | Aug 2018 | AU |
2014223373 | Dec 2018 | AU |
2014240988 | Jan 2019 | AU |
2017202955 | Jan 2019 | AU |
2017300845 | Jan 2019 | AU |
2017324855 | Mar 2019 | AU |
2018278332 | Jan 2020 | AU |
2018287145 | Feb 2020 | AU |
2018309068 | Feb 2020 | AU |
2015314007 | Mar 2020 | AU |
2018312328 | Mar 2020 | AU |
2017406159 | May 2020 | AU |
2018375183 | Jun 2020 | AU |
2018389797 | Jun 2020 | AU |
2018388577 | Jul 2020 | AU |
2019206950 | Aug 2020 | AU |
2016328150 | Oct 2020 | AU |
2019252790 | Oct 2020 | AU |
2019383389 | May 2021 | AU |
2019283096 | Jul 2021 | AU |
2019420189 | Jul 2021 | AU |
2020231916 | Aug 2021 | AU |
9916063 | Jan 2002 | BR |
PI0607003 | Jul 2009 | BR |
PI0713801 | Nov 2012 | BR |
PI0714907 | Aug 2014 | BR |
112015014007 | Jul 2017 | BR |
112015021403 | Jul 2017 | BR |
112013020537 | Sep 2017 | BR |
112019000848 | Apr 2019 | BR |
112019004479 | Jul 2019 | BR |
112015021012 | Nov 2019 | BR |
112015003120 | Dec 2019 | BR |
112019020464 | Apr 2020 | BR |
112019025286 | Jun 2020 | BR |
112020002289 | Jul 2020 | BR |
112019027479 | Sep 2020 | BR |
112020010976 | Nov 2020 | BR |
112020012417 | Nov 2020 | BR |
112020020865 | Jan 2021 | BR |
112020014189 | Feb 2021 | BR |
112012028035 | May 2021 | BR |
PI0709606 | May 2021 | BR |
112021006027 | Jun 2021 | BR |
2217902 | Jan 1999 | CA |
2112663 | Apr 2002 | CA |
2510289 | Jul 2004 | CA |
2597910 | Aug 2006 | CA |
2654383 | Jan 2008 | CA |
2662197 | Mar 2008 | CA |
2423358 | May 2011 | CA |
2786819 | Jul 2011 | CA |
2880456 | Feb 2014 | CA |
2904045 | Oct 2014 | CA |
2917702 | Jan 2015 | CA |
2645855 | Feb 2015 | CA |
2540895 | Aug 2016 | CA |
2999367 | Mar 2017 | CA |
2798178 | Jun 2017 | CA |
2894876 | Aug 2017 | CA |
2740146 | Nov 2017 | CA |
3028878 | Jan 2018 | CA |
3036068 | Mar 2018 | CA |
3036071 | Mar 2018 | CA |
3039045 | Apr 2018 | CA |
2794171 | Jul 2018 | CA |
3056316 | Sep 2018 | CA |
2930900 | Oct 2018 | CA |
3058216 | Oct 2018 | CA |
3065522 | Dec 2018 | CA |
3068100 | Dec 2018 | CA |
3071544 | Feb 2019 | CA |
3071779 | Feb 2019 | CA |
2825991 | Mar 2019 | CA |
3083499 | Jun 2019 | CA |
3084120 | Jun 2019 | CA |
3085941 | Jun 2019 | CA |
3086153 | Jun 2019 | CA |
3097737 | Jun 2019 | CA |
3087912 | Jul 2019 | CA |
3095335 | Oct 2019 | CA |
2902948 | Dec 2019 | CA |
3102650 | Dec 2019 | CA |
3115122 | May 2020 | CA |
1236813 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101132780 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101478952 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101400343 | Jan 2012 | CN |
101528261 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102905688 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102946869 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102958930 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103209966 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103209967 | Jul 2013 | CN |
102488652 | Jun 2014 | CN |
105073106 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105188677 | Dec 2015 | CN |
102917697 | Jan 2016 | CN |
102946869 | Aug 2016 | CN |
105848650 | Aug 2016 | CN |
105025892 | Mar 2018 | CN |
109789096 | May 2019 | CN |
109906078 | Jun 2019 | CN |
105873576 | Jul 2019 | CN |
109996540 | Jul 2019 | CN |
110049966 | Jul 2019 | CN |
110638804 | Jan 2020 | CN |
110638805 | Jan 2020 | CN |
110709386 | Jan 2020 | CN |
111094238 | May 2020 | CN |
111132663 | May 2020 | CN |
111201014 | May 2020 | CN |
111278807 | Jun 2020 | CN |
111315878 | Jun 2020 | CN |
111317730 | Jun 2020 | CN |
111356699 | Jun 2020 | CN |
111511355 | Aug 2020 | CN |
111770914 | Oct 2020 | CN |
111818937 | Oct 2020 | CN |
111836798 | Oct 2020 | CN |
106866733 | Nov 2020 | CN |
112004520 | Nov 2020 | CN |
112004802 | Nov 2020 | CN |
112135812 | Dec 2020 | CN |
112236149 | Jan 2021 | CN |
112566902 | Mar 2021 | CN |
108283000 | Apr 2021 | CN |
106866784 | May 2021 | CN |
107108588 | Jun 2021 | CN |
113061089 | Jul 2021 | CN |
2020001873 | Apr 2020 | CO |
60129122 | Oct 2007 | DE |
1278721 | Oct 2007 | DK |
2018160 | Feb 2012 | DK |
2428205 | Oct 2012 | DK |
2931268 | Feb 2018 | DK |
2961399 | Feb 2018 | DK |
2884961 | Apr 2019 | DK |
2675438 | May 2019 | DK |
2768484 | Oct 2019 | DK |
3335708 | Feb 2020 | DK |
3021838 | Aug 2020 | DK |
3335709 | Oct 2020 | DK |
0203768 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0235408 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0344704 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0616804 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0635265 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0709087 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0635265 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1140061 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1140061 | May 2003 | EP |
1316309 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1278721 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1853230 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2032125 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2056877 | May 2009 | EP |
2068933 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2018160 | Dec 2011 | EP |
1135150 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2428205 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2549987 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2968151 | Apr 2017 | EP |
2451486 | May 2017 | EP |
2760911 | Nov 2017 | EP |
2931268 | Nov 2017 | EP |
2961399 | Nov 2017 | EP |
1434572 | Dec 2017 | EP |
2341910 | Sep 2018 | EP |
3418383 | Dec 2018 | EP |
2884961 | Mar 2019 | EP |
2675438 | Apr 2019 | EP |
3470067 | Apr 2019 | EP |
3487483 | May 2019 | EP |
2768484 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3353145 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3353145 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3523275 | Aug 2019 | EP |
3572071 | Nov 2019 | EP |
3335708 | Dec 2019 | EP |
3595648 | Jan 2020 | EP |
3509581 | Apr 2020 | EP |
3642340 | Apr 2020 | EP |
3021838 | May 2020 | EP |
3509582 | May 2020 | EP |
3661484 | Jun 2020 | EP |
2566462 | Jul 2020 | EP |
3335709 | Aug 2020 | EP |
3695833 | Aug 2020 | EP |
3716997 | Oct 2020 | EP |
3727348 | Oct 2020 | EP |
3601235 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3737353 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3737665 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3740188 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3740189 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3668837 | Dec 2020 | EP |
3679051 | Dec 2020 | EP |
3773608 | Feb 2021 | EP |
3630072 | Mar 2021 | EP |
3661911 | Apr 2021 | EP |
3799867 | Apr 2021 | EP |
3802501 | Apr 2021 | EP |
2378573 | Apr 2012 | ES |
2396039 | Feb 2013 | ES |
2717469 | Jun 2019 | ES |
2721900 | Aug 2019 | ES |
922029 | Mar 1963 | GB |
2295390 | May 1996 | GB |
1156518 | Jun 2012 | HK |
1181639 | Nov 2013 | HK |
1201039 | Aug 2015 | HK |
1215181 | Aug 2016 | HK |
1215539 | Sep 2016 | HK |
1219236 | Mar 2017 | HK |
1256965 | Oct 2019 | HK |
1257965 | Nov 2019 | HK |
40002726 | Mar 2020 | HK |
40003964 | Apr 2020 | HK |
40009279 | Jun 2020 | HK |
40014757 | Aug 2020 | HK |
40027633 | Jan 2021 | HK |
40029219 | Feb 2021 | HK |
40029594 | Feb 2021 | HK |
40029856 | Feb 2021 | HK |
40031621 | Mar 2021 | HK |
40031646 | Mar 2021 | HK |
1182964 | Apr 2021 | HK |
1257033 | Apr 2021 | HK |
40033315 | Apr 2021 | HK |
40035049 | May 2021 | HK |
40038018 | Jun 2021 | HK |
201703439 | Apr 2017 | ID |
201906443 | Aug 2019 | ID |
201906490 | Aug 2019 | ID |
201907562 | Oct 2019 | ID |
143580 | May 2007 | IL |
194042 | Jun 2014 | IL |
239355 | May 2017 | IL |
222012 | Nov 2017 | IL |
222161 | Nov 2017 | IL |
227734 | Aug 2018 | IL |
236847 | May 2019 | IL |
240874 | Jun 2019 | IL |
241533 | Feb 2020 | IL |
275312 | Jul 2020 | IL |
275444 | Aug 2020 | IL |
265193 | Apr 2021 | IL |
200706499 | Sep 2007 | IN |
216331 | Mar 2008 | IN |
222233 | Aug 2008 | IN |
200808703 | May 2009 | IN |
200900401 | Jun 2009 | IN |
200901567 | Jun 2009 | IN |
201209462 | Jan 2016 | IN |
201505205 | Jul 2016 | IN |
201917009658 | Jun 2019 | IN |
201917013067 | Jun 2019 | IN |
201917017276 | Aug 2019 | IN |
342246 | Jul 2020 | IN |
342829 | Jul 2020 | IN |
202017008027 | Aug 2020 | IN |
202017008237 | Oct 2020 | IN |
202017045975 | Feb 2021 | IN |
361207 | Mar 2021 | IN |
S5742651 | Mar 1982 | JP |
S6212715 | Jan 1987 | JP |
H0449212 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H05508422 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H06508839 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H0753365 | Feb 1995 | JP |
H08511257 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H09104620 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H10505604 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2001513552 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002531515 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004514732 | May 2004 | JP |
2007521231 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007532689 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008512386 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008519847 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008520633 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008528571 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009526825 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009532331 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2011500865 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2013522373 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014505094 | Feb 2014 | JP |
5479086 | Apr 2014 | JP |
5816091 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2016503002 | Feb 2016 | JP |
5925766 | May 2016 | JP |
5968300 | Aug 2016 | JP |
6215347 | Oct 2017 | JP |
6433440 | Dec 2018 | JP |
6516720 | May 2019 | JP |
6529495 | Jun 2019 | JP |
2019163298 | Sep 2019 | JP |
6683886 | Apr 2020 | JP |
2020100670 | Jul 2020 | JP |
6781150 | Nov 2020 | JP |
6824315 | Feb 2021 | JP |
6830671 | Feb 2021 | JP |
2021506752 | Feb 2021 | JP |
2021506984 | Feb 2021 | JP |
100602725 | Jul 2006 | KR |
20070104471 | Oct 2007 | KR |
20090031598 | Mar 2009 | KR |
20090043603 | May 2009 | KR |
101495146 | Feb 2015 | KR |
20150129695 | Nov 2015 | KR |
20160030955 | Mar 2016 | KR |
20160032127 | Mar 2016 | KR |
20180058738 | Jun 2018 | KR |
20190065311 | Jun 2019 | KR |
20190072561 | Jun 2019 | KR |
20190104510 | Sep 2019 | KR |
20190134711 | Dec 2019 | KR |
20200016889 | Feb 2020 | KR |
20200030065 | Mar 2020 | KR |
20200045489 | May 2020 | KR |
20200116102 | Oct 2020 | KR |
20200119234 | Oct 2020 | KR |
20200121780 | Oct 2020 | KR |
2180343 | Nov 2020 | KR |
2192554 | Dec 2020 | KR |
20210008478 | Jan 2021 | KR |
2239042 | Apr 2021 | KR |
20210094513 | Jul 2021 | KR |
29319 | Mar 2008 | MA |
PA01005884 | Apr 2002 | MX |
233001 | Dec 2005 | MX |
2007009923 | Mar 2008 | MX |
2008015083 | Dec 2008 | MX |
2009002310 | Sep 2009 | MX |
2015011242 | May 2016 | MX |
340591 | Jul 2016 | MX |
366681 | Jul 2019 | MX |
2019002606 | Sep 2019 | MX |
372447 | Mar 2020 | MX |
377251 | Nov 2020 | MX |
381381 | Apr 2021 | MX |
118612 | Dec 2004 | MY |
20073854 | Nov 2007 | NO |
326479 | Dec 2008 | NO |
20085158 | Jan 2009 | NO |
20091211 | May 2009 | NO |
512287 | Dec 2002 | NZ |
556562 | Aug 2010 | NZ |
572481 | Mar 2011 | NZ |
575744 | Oct 2011 | NZ |
595388 | Dec 2011 | NZ |
14824 | Jan 2011 | OA |
12019500493 | May 2019 | PH |
12019500494 | Jun 2019 | PH |
12019500751 | Aug 2019 | PH |
12019502723 | Jul 2020 | PH |
192864 | Dec 2006 | PL |
1278721 | Jul 2007 | PT |
2931268 | Feb 2018 | PT |
2961399 | Feb 2018 | PT |
2768484 | Oct 2019 | PT |
3335708 | Mar 2020 | PT |
3021838 | Sep 2020 | PT |
3335709 | Oct 2020 | PT |
57077 | Jun 2018 | RS |
2210360 | Aug 2003 | RU |
2257917 | Aug 2005 | RU |
2435569 | Dec 2011 | RU |
2673239 | Nov 2018 | RU |
2725886 | Jul 2020 | RU |
2019110127 | Oct 2020 | RU |
2020101972 | Jul 2021 | RU |
136196 | Nov 2007 | SG |
11201504637 | Oct 2017 | SG |
11201505029 | Nov 2017 | SG |
11201901996 | Apr 2019 | SG |
11201901998 | Apr 2019 | SG |
11201903076 | May 2019 | SG |
11201911470 | Dec 2019 | SG |
11201912625 | Jan 2020 | SG |
11202000817 | Feb 2020 | SG |
11202000952 | Feb 2020 | SG |
11201507121 | May 2020 | SG |
11202004965 | Jun 2020 | SG |
11202006575 | Aug 2020 | SG |
513416 | Dec 2002 | TW |
200812649 | Mar 2008 | TW |
200815045 | Apr 2008 | TW |
200824693 | Jun 2008 | TW |
I619492 | Apr 2018 | TW |
201831174 | Sep 2018 | TW |
201836596 | Oct 2018 | TW |
201840544 | Nov 2018 | TW |
I639425 | Nov 2018 | TW |
201909904 | Mar 2019 | TW |
201919605 | Jun 2019 | TW |
201932448 | Aug 2019 | TW |
I681770 | Jan 2020 | TW |
202014186 | Apr 2020 | TW |
202019880 | Jun 2020 | TW |
I707677 | Oct 2020 | TW |
I710552 | Nov 2020 | TW |
I716458 | Jan 2021 | TW |
I727362 | May 2021 | TW |
30442 | Jan 2008 | UY |
30561 | Mar 2008 | UY |
35599 | Sep 2019 | VN |
66223 | Oct 2019 | VN |
66257 | Oct 2019 | VN |
76195 | Mar 2021 | VN |
9428880 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9640105 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9909972 | Mar 1999 | WO |
0033862 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0038672 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0119361 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0224715 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0245684 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2005016318 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005055983 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005099671 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006029155 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006053186 | May 2006 | WO |
2006080029 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006088814 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007053698 | May 2007 | WO |
2007103200 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007109104 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008033351 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008027395 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008042218 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008005240 | May 2008 | WO |
2008086804 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008027357 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009056550 | May 2009 | WO |
2009092818 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009104080 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010042759 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010053691 | May 2010 | WO |
2010055260 | May 2010 | WO |
2010124046 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011119839 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011127252 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011139271 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011135461 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011140310 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012028688 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012085656 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012107652 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012112140 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012112492 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012114342 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013119231 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014028610 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014078014 | May 2014 | WO |
2014093791 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014134380 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014159340 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015006685 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015010014 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015076821 | May 2015 | WO |
2015120006 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015120110 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015166473 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016087952 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016178132 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017049470 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017050259 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017147375 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017182851 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2018015563 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018048862 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018048871 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018067971 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018167303 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018176343 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018222954 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2018234492 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2019027941 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019033330 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019041361 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2019109018 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019123269 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019126214 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019126215 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019126218 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019137381 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2019028340 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2019126216 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019200251 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019232724 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2019233447 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2020019247 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020020189 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020062251 | Apr 2020 | WO |
2020106735 | May 2020 | WO |
2020118165 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020143198 | Jul 2020 | WO |
2020178695 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2021078988 | Apr 2021 | WO |
2021127461 | Jun 2021 | WO |
2021133778 | Jul 2021 | WO |
200104585 | Jun 2002 | ZA |
202000676 | Jan 2021 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Abad et al., “New developments in the management of narcolepsy”, Nature and Science of Sleep, 2017, pp. 39-57, vol. 9. |
Abanades et al., “γ-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in Humans, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics”, Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 2006, pp. 559-576, vol. 1074. |
Abanades et al., “Relative Abuse Liability of γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Flunitrazepam, and Ethanol in Club Drug Users”, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2007, pp. 625-638, vol. 27, No. 6. |
Ahmed et al., “Narcolepsy and influenza vaccination-induced autoimmunity”, Annals of Translational Medicine, 2017, pp. 1-4, vol. 5, No. 1. |
Ahmed et al., “The Safety of Adjuvanted Vaccines Revisited: Vaccine-Induced Narcolepsy”, Isr Med Assoc J., 2016, pp. 216-220, vol. 18. |
Aldrete et al., “Does Magnesium Produce Anesthesia? Evaluation of Its Effects on the Cardiovascular and Neurologic Systems”, Anesthesia and Analgesia, 1968, pp. 428-433, vol. 47, No. 4. |
Alshaikh et al., “Sodium Oxybate for Narcolepsy with Cataplexy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2012, pp. 451-458, vol. 8, No. 4. |
Arena et al., “Absorption of Sodium γ-Hydroxybutyrate and Its Prodrug γ-Butyrolactone: Relationship between In Vitro Transport and In Vivo Absorption”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1980, pp. 356-358, vol. 69, No. 3. |
Barateau et al., “Hypersomnolence, Hypersomnia, and Mood Disorders”, Current Psychiatry Reports, 2017, pp. 1-11, vol. 19. |
Barateau et al., “Management of Narcolepsy”, Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2016, pp. 1-13, vol. 18. |
Bayram et al., “Efficiency of a Combination of Pharmacological Treatment and Nondrug Interventions in Childhood Narcolepsy”, Neuropediatrics, 2016, pp. 380-387, vol. 47, No. 6. |
Bhattacharya et al., “Feasibility of D-Glucuronate to Enhance γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid Metabolism During γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid Toxicity: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies”, Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, 2007, pp. 1-11, vol. 28. |
Bhattacharya et al., “Potential γ-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) Drug Interactions Through Blood-Brain Barrier Transport Inhibition: A Pharmacokinetic Simulation-Based Evaluation”, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2006, pp. 657-681, vol. 33, No. 5. |
Black et al., “Challenges in the development of therapeutics for narcolepsy”, Prog Neurobiol., 2017, pp. 89-113, vol. 152. |
Black et al., “Medical Comorbidity in Narcolepsy: Findings from the Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (BOND) Study”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, pp. 13-18, vol. 33. |
Black et al., “The Nightly Use of Sodium Oxybate Is Associated with a Reduction in Noctural Sleep Disruption: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Patients with Narcolepsy”, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2010, pp. 596-602, vol. 6, No. 6. |
Bogan et al., “Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients With Narcolepsy Treated with Sodium Oxybate: Use of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey in a Clinical Trial”, Neurology and Therapy, 2016, pp. 203-213, vol. 5. |
Borgen et al., “The Influence of Gender and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate Oral Solution in Healthy Subjects”, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2003, pp. 59-65, vol. 43. |
Borgen et al., “The Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate Oral Solution following Acute and Chronic Administration to Narcoleptic Patients”, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004, pp. 253-257, vol. 44. |
Boscolo-Berto et al., “Narcolepsy and effectiveness of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”, Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2012, pp. 431-443, vol. 16. |
Brailsford et al. “Increases in Serum Growth Hormone Concentrations Associated with GHB Administration”, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2017, pp. 54-59, vol. 41. |
Brenneisen et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Excretion of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in Healthy Subjects”, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2004, pp. 625-630, vol. 28. |
Calik, “Update on the treatment of narcolepsy: clinical efficacy of pitolisant”, Nature and Science of Sleep, 2017, pp. 127-133, vol. 9. |
Carlier et al., “Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), an unusual cause of high anion gap metabolic acidosis”, CJEM-JCMU, 2018, pp. S2-S5, vol. 20. |
Carter et al., “Behavioral Analyses of GHB: Receptor Mechanisms”, Pharmacol Ther., 2009, pp. 100-114, vol. 121, No. 1. |
Carter et al., “Cognitive, psychomotor, and subjective effects of sodium oxybate and triazolam in healthy volunteers”, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2009, pp. 141-154, vol. 206, No. 1. |
Ciolino et al., “The Chemical Interconversion of GHB and GBL: Forensic Issues and Implications”, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2001, pp. 1315-1323, vol. 46, No. 6. |
Cook et al., “Review article: short chain fatty acids in health and disease”, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1998, pp. 499-507, vol. 12. |
Cremaschi et al., “Narcolepsy type 1 and type 2—a 10-year follow-up: body mass index and comorbidities”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, pp. 285-286, vol. 32. |
Dauvilliers et al., “Vitamin D deficiency in type 1 narcolepsy: a reappraisal”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, pp. 1-6, vol. 29. |
Dauvilliers et al., “Narcolepsy with cataplexy”, The Lancet, 2007, pp. 499-511, vol. 369. |
Donjacour et al., “Sodium oxybate increases prolactin secretion in narcolepsy patients and healthy controls”, European Journal of Endocrinology, 2011, pp. 363-370, vol. 164. |
Drakatos et al., “Sleep-stage sequencing of sleep-onset REM periods in MSLT predicts treatment response in patients with narcolepsy”, J Sleep Res., 2016, pp. 203-210, vol. 25. |
Dye et al., “Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Childhood Narcolepsy”, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 2018, pp. 14-18, vol. 25. |
Felmlee et al., “Concentration-Effect Relationships for the Drug of Abuse γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid”, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2010, pp. 764-771, vol. 333, No. 3. |
Felmlee et al., “Mechanistic Toxicokinetic Model for γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid: Inhibition of Active Renal Reabsorption as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy”, The AAPS Journal, 2010, pp. 407-416, vol. 12, No. 3. |
Ferrara et al., “Therapeutic gamma-hydroxybutyric acid monitoring in plasma and urine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry”, Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, 1993, pp. 483-487, vol. 11, No. 6. |
Ferris et al., “Synthesis, characterisation and detection of gamma-hydroxybutyrate salts”, Forensic Science International, 2012, pp. 158-162, vol. 216. |
Flores et al., “The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Narcolepsy”, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2016, pp. 401-407, vol. 12, No. 3. |
Franco et al., “High bicarbonate levels in narcoleptic children”, J Sleep Res., 2016, pp. 194-202, vol. 25. |
Fuller et al., “The Xyrem® Risk Management Program”, Drug Safety, 2004, pp. 293-306, vol. 27, No. 5. |
Fung et al., “Pharmacokinetics of 1,4-Butanediol in Rats: Bioactivation to γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Interaction with Ethanol, and Oral Bioavailability”, The AAPS Journal, 2008, pp. 56-69, vol. 10, No. 1. |
Gadroen et al., “Patterns of spontaneous reports on narcolepsy following administration of pandemic influenza vaccine; a case series of individual case safety reports in Eudravigilance”, Vaccine, 2016, pp. 4892-4897, vol. 34. |
George et al., “A 2-week, polysomnographic, safety study of sodium oxybate in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome”, Sleep Breath, 2011, pp. 13-20, vol. 15. |
Gill et al., “Expression and membrane localization of MCT isoforms along the length of the human intestine”, Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2005, pp. C846-C852, vol. 289. |
Grenier et al., “Enzymatic Assay for GHB Determination in Forensic Matrices”, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2012, pp. 523-528, vol. 36. |
Laborit H., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate, Succinic Semialdehyde and Sleep,” Laboratoire d'Eutonologie, 1973, pp. 257-274. |
Ladinsky H., et al., “Mode of Action of Gamma-Butyrolactone on the Central Cholinergic System,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's, Arch Pharmacol, 1983, vol. 322 (1), pp. 42-48. |
Lammers G.J., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate and Narcolepsy: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study,” Sleep, 1993, vol. 16 (3), pp. 216-220. |
Lapierre, et al., “The Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate: A Double-Blind Study of Normal Subjects,” Sleep Research, 1988, vol. 17 (99), 6 pages. |
Lapierre O., et al., “The Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Nocturnal and Diurnal Sleep of Normal Subjects: Further Considerations on REM Sleep-Triggering Mechanisms,” Sleep, 1990, vol. 13 (1), pp. 24-30. |
Lee C.R., “Evidence for the Beta-Oxidation of Orally Administered 4-Hydroxybutyrate in Humans,” Biochemical Medicine, 1977, vol. 17 (3), pp. 284-291. |
Lettieri J., et al., “Improved Pharmacological Activity via Pro-Drug Modification: Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Gamma-hydroxybutyrate and Gamma-butyrolactone,” Research Communications in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology, Oct. 1, 1978, vol. 22 (1), pp. 107-118. |
Lubrano E., et al., “Fibromyalgia in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. An Association with the Severity of the Intestinal Disorder,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2001, vol. 16 (4), pp. 211-215. |
Luhn O., “Using Excipients In Powder Formulations,” Pharmaceutical Technology Europe, Retrieved from URL: https://www.pharmtech.com/view/using-excipients-powder-formulations, Jan. 7, 2011, vol. 23 (1), 2 pages. |
Mahore J.G., et al., “Ion Exchange Resins: Pharmaceutical Applications and Recent Advancement,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, Mar.-Apr. 2010, vol. 1 (2), pp. 8-13. |
Mamelak M., et al., “Sleep-Inducing Effects of Gammahydroxybutyrate,” The Lancet, Aug. 11, 1973, vol. 302 (7824), pp. 328-329. |
Mamelak M., et al., “The Effects of y-Hydroxybutyrate on Sleep,” Biological Psychiatry, 1977, vol. 12 (2), pp. 273-288. |
Mamelak M., et al., “Treatment of Narcolepsy and Sleep Apnea with Gammahydroxybutyrate: A Clinical and Polysomnographic Case Study,” Sleep, 1981, vol. 4 (1), pp. 105-111. |
Mamelak M., et al., “Treatment of Narcolepsy with y-Hydroxybutyrate. A Review of Clinical and Sleep Laboratory Findings,” Sleep, 1986, vol. 9 (1), pp. 285-289. |
Mamelak M., “Gamma-hydroxybutyrate: An Endogenous Regulator of Energy Metabolism,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 1989, vol. 13 (4), pp. 187-198. |
Markman Opinion, filed Sep. 14, 2012, In the Case of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil 10-6108 ES, 43 pages. |
Medicines for Children, “Oral Rehydration Salts,” Leaflet information by Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group (NPPG), Retrieved from URL: https://www.medicinesforchildren.org.uk/oral-rehyd ration-salts, published Jul. 25, 2013, 3 pages. |
Moldofsky H., “A Chronobiologic Theory of Fibromyalgia,” Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, 1993, vol. 1 (1), pp. 49-59. |
Moldofsky H., et al., “Muskuloskeletal Symptoms and Non-REM Sleep Disturbance in Patients with ‘Fibrositis Syndrome’ and Healthy Subjects,” Psychosomatic Medicine, Jul.-Aug. 1975, vol. 37 (4), pp. 341-351. |
Morrison R.T., et al., “Organic Chemistry,” 3rd Edition, 1973, pp. 672-677. |
Nema S., et al., “Excipients and Their Use in Injectable Products,” PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Jul.-Aug. 1997, vol. 51 (4), pp. 166-171. |
Neuman A., “GHB's Path to Legitimacy: An Administrative and Legislative History of Xyrem,” Harvard Law School, Class of 2005, Food and Drug Law, Winter Term 2004, Professor Peter Barton Hutt, Apr. 2004, pp. 1-39. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated May 3, 2018, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,633, dated Feb. 18, 2021, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Jul. 7, 2021, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,510, dated Dec. 1, 2020, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,515, dated Dec. 24, 2020, 19 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/322,299, dated Jul. 21, 2021, 18 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-055505, dated Mar. 12, 2020, 9 Pages. |
Ohta K.M., et al., “Development of a Simple Method for the Preparation of a Silica Gel Based Controlled Delivery System With a High Drug Content,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2005, vol. 26 (1), pp. 87-96. |
Ondo W.G., et al., “Sodium Oxybate for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson's Disease: An Open-Lable Polysomnographic Study,” Arch Neural, Oct. 2008, vol. 65 (10), pp. 1337-1340. |
Order, filed Sep. 14, 2012, in the case of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil 10-6108 ES). |
Outlaw W.M., et al., “Dyspepsia and its Overlap with Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2006, vol. 8 (4), pp. 266-272. |
Palatini P., et al., “Dose Dependent Absorption and Elimination of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Healthy Volunteers,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1993, vol. 45 (4), pp. 353-356. |
Parmar A., et al., “Clinical Characteristics of Cataplectic Attacks in Type 1 Narcolepsy,” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2020, vol. 20 (38), 9 pages. |
Patil P., et al., “A Review on Ionotropic Gelation Method: Novel Approach for Controlled Gastroretentive Gelispheres,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2012, vol. 4, Suppl. 4, pp. 27-32. |
“Phospholine Iodide,” Physicians Desk Reference, 50th Edition, 1996, p. 2784. |
Puguan J.M.C., et al., “Diffusion Characteristics of Different Molecular Weight Solutes in Ca-Alginate Gel Beads,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015, vol. 469, pp. 158-165. |
Raymond C.R., “Polymethacrylates,” Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, Fifth Edition, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 2006, pp. 553-560. |
Roth R.H., et al., “y-Butyrolactone and y-Hydroxybutyric Acid-I, Distribution and Metabolism,” Biochemical Pharmacology, 1966, vol. 15 (9), pp. 1333-1348. |
Roth R.H., et al., “y-Butyrolactone and y-Hydroxybutyric Acid-II, The Pharmacologically Active Form,” International Journal of Neuropharmacology, 1966, vol. 5 (6), pp. 421-428. |
Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Jun. 1, 2011, 12 pages. |
Roxane Laboratories Inc.,“Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Mar. 9, 2011, 13 pages. |
Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Nov. 9, 2012, 18 pages. |
Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Dec. 29, 2010, 21 pages. |
Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint,” dated Jan. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
Roxane Laboratories Inc., “Intitial Invalidity and Noninfringement Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.6,” dated Apr. 14, 2011, 23 pages. |
Rubbens J., et al., “Gastric and Duodenal Ethanol Concentrations after Intake of Alcoholic Beverages in Postprandial Conditions,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2017, vol. 14 (12), pp. 4202-4208. |
Russell I.J., et al., “Sodium Oxybate Relieves Pain and Improves Function in Fibromyalgia Syndrome,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, Jan. 2009, vol. 60 (1), pp. 299-309. |
Scharf M.B., et al., “Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Pain, Fatigue, and the Alpha Sleep Anomaly in Patients with Fibromyalgia. Preliminary Report,” 1998, Journal of Rheumatology, 1998, vol. 25 (10), pp. 1986-1990. |
Takahara et al., “Stimulatory Effects of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid on Growth Hormone and Prolactin Release in Humans”, J. Clin. Endocrino. Metab., 1977, pp. 1014-1017, vol. 44, No. 5. |
Thai et al., “GHB and Ethanol Effects and Interactions in Humans”, J Clin Psychopharmacol., 2006, pp. 524-529, vol. 26, No. 5. |
Thorpy et al., “Reducing the Clinical and Socioeconomic Burden of Narcolepsy by Earlier Diagnosis and Effective Treatment”, Sleep Med Clin., 2017, pp. 61-71, vol. 12. |
Tittarelli et al., “Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry determination of GHB, GHB-glucuronide in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of narcoleptic patients under sodium oxybate treatment”, Forensic Science International, 2017, pp. 70-74, vol. 274. |
Van der Heide et al., “Core Body and Skin Temperature in Type 1 Narcolepsy in Daily Life; Effects of Sodium Oxybate and Prediction of Sleep Attacks”, Sleep, 2016, pp. 1941-1949, vol. 39, No. 11. |
Van Ginneken et al., “Linear and Nonlinear Kinetics of Drug Elimination. I. Kinetics on the Basis of a Single Capacity-Limited Pathway of Elimination with or Without Simultaneous Supply-Limited Elimination”, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1974, pp. 395-415, vol. 2, No. 5. |
Van Schie et al., “Improved vigilance after sodium oxybate treatment in narcolepsy: a comparison between in-field and in-laboratory measurements”, Journal of Sleep Research, 2016, pp. 486-496, vol. 25. |
Wang et al., “The Role of Monocarboxylate Transporter 2 and 4 in the Transport of γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Mammalian Cells”, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2007, pp. 1393-1399, vol. 35, No. 8. |
Wang et al., “Flavonoids Modulate Monocarboxylate Transporter-1-Mediated Transport of γ-Hydroxybutyrate in Vitro and in Vivo”, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2007, pp. 201-208, vol. 35, No. 2. |
Wang et al., “Transport of γ-Hydroxybutyrate in Rat Kidney Membrane Vesicles: Role of Monocarboxylate Transporters”, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2006, pp. 751-761, vol. 318, No. 2. |
Wang et al., “Characterization of Monocarboxylate Transport in Human Kidney HK-2 Cells”, Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2006, pp. 675-685, vol. 3, No. 6. |
Wang et al., “Monocarboxylate Transporter (MCT) Mediates the Transport of γ-Hydroxybutyrate in Human Kidney HK-2 cells”, Pharmaceutical Research, 2007, pp. 1067-1078, vol. 24, No. 6. |
Wang et al., “Pharmacokinetic Interaction between the Flavonoid Luteolin and γ-Hydroxybutyrate in Rats: Potential Involvement of Monocarboxylate Transporters”, The AAPS Journal, 2008, pp. 47-55, vol. 10, No. 1. |
“Activase,” Physicians Desk Reference, 50th Edition, 1996, pp. 312, 1058-1061. |
Akifuddin S.K., et al., “Preparation, Characterization and In-Vitro Evaluation of Microcapsules for Controlled Release of Diltiazem Hydrochloride by Ionotropic Gelation Technique,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, Apr. 2013, vol. 3 (4), pp. 35-42. |
Alshaikh M.K., et al., “Sodium Oxybate for Narcolepsy with Cataplexy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2012, vol. 8 (4), pp. 451-458. |
“Amberlite IRN78 Resin, Nuclear Grade Strong Base Anion Resin,” The Dow Chemical Company, Product Data Sheet, Form No. 177-02230-0311, Rev. 0, 3 pages. |
Anand V., et al., “Ion-Exchange Resins: Carrying Drug Delivery Forward,” Drug Discovery Today 2001, Sep. 17, 2001, vol. 6 (17), pp. 905-914. |
Anonymous, “The Engineering Toolbox,” Retrieved from internet URL: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/relative-humidity-production-processd_511.html, 2003, 3 pages. |
Baldrick P., “Pharmaceutical Excipient Development: The Need for Preclinical Guidance,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Oct. 2000, vol. 32 (2), pp. 210-218. |
Bedard M.A., et al., “Nocturnal y-Hydroxybutyrate—Effect on Periodic Leg Movements and Sleep Organization of Narcoleptic Patients,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, Feb. 1989, vol. 12 (1), pp. 29-36. |
Berthier M., et al., “Possible Involvement of a Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid Receptor in Startle Disease,” Acta Paediatr, 1994, vol. 83, pp. 678-680. |
BioSpace: “Flamel Technologies Announces Positive Results of a Second Clinical Trial with Micropump® Sodium Oxybate,” BioSpace, Published on: Dec. 22, 2014, 6 Pages. |
Bodmeier R., “Tableting of Coated Pellets,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 1997, vol. 43 (1), pp. 1-8. |
Borgen L., et al., “Xyrem (sodium oxybate): A Study of Dose Proportionality in Healthy Human Subjects,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000, vol. 40, p. 1053. |
Bowker M.J., et al., “Preparation of Water-Soluble Compounds Through Salt Formulation,” Edited by Wermuth C. G., The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, Academic Press, Third Edition, Chapter 37, 2008, pp. 749-766. |
Broughton R., et al., “Effects of Nocturnal Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Spell/Waking Patterns in Narcolepsy-Cataplexy,” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Feb. 1980, vol. 7 (1), pp. 23-31. |
Broughton R., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxy-Butyrate in the Treatment of Narcolepsy: A Preliminary Report,” Narcolepsy, Spectrum Publications, Inc, N.Y., 1976, pp. 659-667. |
Broughton R., et al., “The Treatment of Narcolepsy-Cataplexy with Nocturnal Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate,” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1979, vol. 6 (1), pp. 1-6. |
Caballero F., et al., “Characterization of Alginate Beads Loaded With Ibuprofen Lysine Salt and Optimization of the Preparation Method,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2014, vol. 460 (1), pp. 181-188. |
Chem Abstract, ES302338, SciFinder, 1964, 1 page. |
Consolo S., et al., “Mediation by the Corticostriatal Input of the In Vivo Increase in Rat Striatal Acetylcholine Content Induced by 2-Chloroadenosine,” Biochemical Pharmacology, 1983, vol. 32 (19), pp. 2993-2996. |
Davis G.R., et al., “Active Chloride Secretion in the Normal Human Jejunum,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, Dec. 1980, vol. 66 (6), pp. 1326-1333. |
Ferrara S.D., et al., “Pharmacokinetics of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Alcohol Dependent Patients After Single and Repeated Oral Doses,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1992, vol. 34, pp. 231-235. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,516, dated Feb. 24, 2021, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,219, dated Feb. 24, 2021, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Feb. 24, 2021, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,515, dated Apr. 21, 2021, 78 pages. |
First Office Action for Brazilian Patent Application No. 112019000848.9, dated Jun. 29, 2021, 5 Pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201780057633, dated Oct. 21, 2020, 14 Pages. |
First Office Action for European Patent Application No. 18842651.4, dated May 18, 2021, 5 Pages. |
Flamel: “Flamel's Drug Delivery Platforms,” publication date: Jun. 2015, pp. 1-43. |
“Food and Drug Administration, HHS,” 21 C.F.R., Part 184, 1998, pp. 441-535. |
Frucht S.J., et al., “A Pilot Tolerability and Efficacy Trial of Sodium Oxybate in Ethanol-Responsive Movement Disorders,” Movement Disorders, 2005, vol. 20 (10), pp. 1330-1337. |
Frucht S.J., et al., “A Single-Blind, Open-Label Trial of Sodium Oxybate for Myoclonus and Essential Tremor,” Neurology, 2005, vol. 65 (12), pp. 1967-1970. |
Gallimberti L., et al., “Clinical Efficacy of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Treatment of Opiate Withdrawal,” Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 1994, vol. 244 (3), pp. 113-114. |
Gallimberti L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid for Treatment of Opiate Withdrawal Syndrome,” Neuropsychopharmacology, 1993, vol. 9 (1), pp. 77-81. |
Gallimberti L., “Gamma-hydroxybutyric Acid for Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome,” The Lancet, Sep. 30, 1989, vol. 2 (8666), pp. 787-789. |
Gallimberti L., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Double Blind Study,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Jul./Aug. 1992, vol. 16 (4), pp. 673-676. |
Gennaro A.R., “Oral Solid Dosage Forms,” 20th Edition, Chapter 45, The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 2000, pp. 858-893. |
Gennaro A.R., “Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy,” 20th Edition, 2000, pp. 860-863. |
Gerra G., et al., “Flumazenil Effects on Growth Hormone Response to Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid,” International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1994, vol. 9, pp. 211-215. |
Gessa G.L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) for Treatment of Ethanol Dependence,” European Neuropsychopharmacology, 1993, vol. 3 (3), pp. 224-225. |
Gessa G.L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence,” Clinical Neuropharmacology, 1992, vol. 15, Suppl. 1, Pt. A, pp. 303A-304A. |
Grove-White I.G., et al., “Critical Flicker Frequency after Small Doses of Methohexitone, Diazepam and Sodium 4-Hydroxybutyrate,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Feb. 1971, vol. 43 (2), pp. 110-112. |
Grove-White I.G., et al., “Effect of Methohexitone, Diazepam and Sodium 4-Hydroxybutyrate on Short-Term Memory,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Feb. 1971, vol. 43 (2), pp. 113-116. |
Hasenbos M.A.W.M., et al., “Anaesthesia for Bullectomy, A Technique With Spontaneous Ventilation and Extradural Blockade,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40 (10), pp. 977-980. |
“Hib-Imune,” Physicians Desk Reference, 41st Edition, 1987, pp. 1095-1096. |
“HibVAX,” Physicians Desk Reference, 41st Edition, 1987, p. 870. |
Hoes M.J.A.J.M., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (*) as Hypnotic, Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid as Hypnotic in Man,” L'Encephale: Revue de psychiatry clinique biologique et therapeutique, 1980, vol. 6 (1), pp. 93-99. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2017/068552, dated Jan. 31, 2019, 9 pages. |
Jazz Pharmaceuticals., “Jazz Pharmaceuticals Announces Positive Top-line Results from Phase 3 Study of JZP-258 in Adult Narcolepsy Patients with Cataplexy and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness,” Retrieved from URL: https://investor.jazzpharma.com/node/16206/pdf, Mar. 26, 2019, 2 pages. |
Khediri F., et al., “Efficacy of Diosmectite (Smecta) in the Treatment of Acute Watery Diarrhea in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2011, vol. 2011, Article ID 783196, 9 pages. |
Chang RK et al. “Polymethacrylates,” Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 2006, Fifth Edition, Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp. 553-560. |
Haque et al., “Model Dependent and Independent Approaches to Compare In vito Release Profiles from Ethylcellulose and Eudragit L100 Based Matrix Tablets,” Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci., 2009, 8(1):89-98. |
Office action dated Feb. 18, 2020 from related CA Application No. 3,028,878, 3 pp. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2020 from related JP Application No. 2019-503463, 6 pp. |
Office action dated Apr. 15, 2020 from related U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, 6 pp. |
Office action dated Jan. 24, 2020 from related U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, 13 pp. |
Office action dated Aug. 26, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/420,321, 21 pp. |
Office action dated Aug. 26, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,219, 14 pp. |
Scammell, “Narcolepsy,” The New England Journal of Mdicine, 373:27, Dec. 31, 2015. |
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research (CBER), “Guidance for Industry Container Closure Systems for Packaging Human Drugs and Biologies, Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Documentation,” May 1999, 56 pp. |
Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.), Title 21 “Food and Drugs,” Part 211 “Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals,” Section 211.116 “Stability testing,” vol. 4, Revised as of Apr. 1, 2019, 3 pp. |
World Healt Organization (WHO), Annex 9, “Guidelines on Packaging for Pharmaceutical Products,” WHO Technical Report Series, 2002, No. 902, pp. 119-156. |
Akala, “7.3 Effect of Packaging on Stability of Drugs and Drug Products,” Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook: Regulations and Quality, 2008, Ed. Gad, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 641-686. |
Lusina et al, “Stability study of losartan/hdrochlorothiazide tablets,” Int. J. Pharm., 2005, 291, 127-137. |
Issue Notification dated Aug. 11, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, 1 pp. |
Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,516, 11 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 18, 2020 in related International Application No. PCT/IB2020/051726, 13 pp. |
Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,616, 13 pp. |
Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,940, 22 pp. |
Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/223,940, 22 pp. |
Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, 18 pp. |
Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,616, 10 pp. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 10, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,616, 8 pp. |
Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/420,321, 11 pp. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 15, 2020 in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/420,321, 8 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from related Application No. PCT/EP2017/068552 dated Sep. 15, 2017, 10 pp. |
Morgenthaler, Practice Parameters for the Treatment of Narcolepsy and other Hypersomnias of Central Origin, Sleep. vol. 30, No. 12, 2007. |
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Demonstrates Sodium Oxybate is Effective for the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy, International Xyrem Study Group, Journal of clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 1, No. 4, 2005, pp. 291-397. |
Xyrem (sodum oxybate); Highlights of Prescribing Information and Full Prescribing Information, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Revised: Apr. 2015, 31 pp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 15, 2019 from related International Application No. PCT/IB2018/060278, 11 pp. |
FDA Guideline, Revised Guidance for Industry on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products—General Considerations; Availabiliity, Federal Register, Mar. 19, 2003, Rol. 68, No. 53, 1 pp. |
Scharf M.B., et al., “GHB—New Hope for Narcoleptics?,” Biol Psychiatry, 1989, vol. 26 (4), pp. 329-330. |
Scharf M.B., et al., “The Effects of Sodium Oxybate on Clinical Symptoms and Sleep Patterns in Patients with Fibromyalgia,” Journal of Rheumatology, May 2003, vol. 30 (5) pp. 1070-1074. |
Scharf M.B., “The Effects and Effectiveness of y-Hydroxybutyrate in Patients with Narcolepsy,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Jun. 1985, vol. 46 (6), pp. 222-225. |
Scrima L., et al., “Effect of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on a Patient with Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” Sleep Research, 1987, vol. 16, p. 137. |
Scrima L., et al., “Effect of High Altitude on a Patient with Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” Sleep Research, 1987, vol. 16, p. 427. |
Scrima L., et al., “Efficacy of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Versus Placebo in Treating Narcolepsy-Cataplexy: Double-Blind Subjective Measures,” Biological Psychiatry, 1989, vol. 26 (4), pp. 331-343. |
Scrima L., et al., “Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Effects on Cataplexy and Sleep Attacks in Narcoleptics,” Sleep Research, 1987, vol. 16, p. 134. |
Scrima L., et al., “Narcolepsy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Jan. 24, 1991, vol. 324 (4), pp. 270-272. |
Scrima L., et al., “The Effects of y-Hydroxybutyrate on the Sleep of Narcolepsy Patients: A Double-Blind Study,” Sleep, 1990, vol. 13 (6), pp. 479-490. |
Second Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 3028878, dated Apr. 1, 2021, 4 Pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201780057633, dated Jun. 30, 2021, 12 Pages. |
Seno M., et al., “The Rheological Behaviour of Suspensions of Ion-exchange Resin Particles,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Apr. 1966, vol. 39 (4), pp. 776-778. |
Series F., et al., “Effects of Enhancing Slow-Wave Sleep by Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Obstructive Sleep Apnea,” The American Review of Respiratory Disease, Jun. 1992, vol. 145 (6), pp. 1378-1383. |
Shah V.P., et al., “In Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison—Statistics and Analysis of the Similarity Factor, f2,” Pharmaceutical Research, 1998, vol. 15 (6), pp. 889-896. |
Singh I., et al., “Ion Exchange Resins: Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Applications,” Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2007, vol. 32, pp. 91-100. |
Snead O.C., et al., “Ontogeny of y-Hydroxybutyric Acid. I. Regional Concentration in Developing Rat, Monkey and Human Brain,” Brain Research, 1981, vol. 227 (4), pp. 579-589. |
Snead O.C., “y-Hydroxybutyrate Model of Generalized Absence Seizures: Further Characterization and Comparison with Other Absence Models,” Epilepsia, 1988, vol. 29 (4), pp. 361-368. |
Srikanth M.V., et al., “Ion-Exchange Resins as Controlled Drug Delivery Carriers,” Journal of Scientific Research, 2010, vol. 2 (3), pp. 597-611. |
Stock G., “Increase in Brain Dopamine After Axotomy or Treatment With Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid Due to Elimination of the Nerve Impulse Flow,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol, 1973, vol. 278 (4), pp. 347-361. |
Strong A.J., “y-Hydroxybutyric Acid and Intracranial Pressure,” The Lancet, Jun. 9, 1984, vol. 1 (8389), p. 1304. |
Suner S., et al., “Pediatric Gamma Hydroxybutyrate Intoxication,” Academic Emergency Medicine, 1997, vol. 4 (11), pp. 1041-1045. |
Takka S., et al., “Evaluation of Chitosan/Alginate Beads Using Experimental Design: Formulation and in Vitro Characterization,” AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, Mar. 2010, vol. 11 (1), pp. 460-466. |
“Taxotere,” Physicians Desk Reference, 51st Edition, 1997, pp. 2204-2207. |
Thorpy M.J., “Recently Approved and Upcoming Treatments for Narcolepsy,” CNS Drugs, 2020, vol. 34, pp. 9-27. |
“Transcript of a Markman Hearing,” In the Case of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Defendant (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil 106108 ES), Apr. 26, 2012, 231 pages. |
Tunnicliff G., “Sites of Action of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)—A Neuroactive Drug with Abuse Potential,” Clinical Toxicology, 1997, vol. 35 (6), pp. 581-590. |
Turnberg L.A., “Abnormalities in Intestinal Electrolyte Transport in Congenital Chloridorrhoea,” Gut, 1971, vol. 12 (7), pp. 544-551. |
United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.: The National Formulary, 23/NF18, Jan. 1, 1995, p. 2205. |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., et al., “Dissolution Testing of Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms,” Food and Drug Administration, CDER, Aug. 1997, 18 pages. |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., et al., “Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms: Development, Evaluation, and Application of In Vitro/In Vivo Correlations,” Food and Drug Administration, CDER, Sep. 1997, 28 pages. |
Van A.G., et al., “Placentatransfer of 4-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Man,” Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 1978, vol. 110, pp. 55-64. |
Vickers M.D., “Gammahydroxybutyric Acid,” International Anesthesiology Clinics, 1969, vol. 7 (1), pp. 75-89. |
Wade A., et al., “Malic Acid,” The Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, Second Edition, 1994, pp. 285-286, 633. |
Walden M., et al., “The Effect of Ethanol on the Release of Opioids 30 from Oral Sustained-Release Preparations,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2007, vol. 33 (10), pp. 1101-1111. |
World Health Organization, “Annex 7: Multisource (Generic) Pharmaceutical Products: Guidelines on Registration Requirements to Establish Interchangeability,” WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, Fortieth Report, Retrieved from URL: http://apps.who.int/prequal/infogeneral/documents/TRS937/WHOTRS937_eng.pdf#page=359, 2006, pp. 347-390. |
Xyrem: “Mean Oxybate Plasma Concentration in Healthy Volunteers,” retrieved from URL: https://www.xyremhcp.com/xyrem-pharmacokinetics-adults, downloaded in Jul. 2021, 10 Pages. |
Yamada Y., et al., “Effect of Butyrolactone and Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on the EEG and Sleep Cycle in Man,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1967, vol. 22 (6), pp. 558-562. |
Zheng J., “Formulation and Analytical Development for Low-Dose Oral Drug Products,” John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey, Table 4.1, 2009, 28 pages. |
Haller et al., “GHB Urine Concentrations After Single-Dose Administration in Humans”, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2006, pp. 360-364, vol. 30. |
Helrich et al., “Correlation of Blood Levels of 4-Hydroxybutyrate with State of Consciousness”, Anesthesiology, 1964, pp. 771-775, vol. 25, No. 6. |
Hennessy et al., “The Reactivity of Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) in Alcoholic Solutions”, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2004, pp. 1-10, vol. 49, No. 6. |
Jennum et al., “Morbidity of childhood onset narcolepsy: a controlled national study”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, pp. 13-17, vol. 29. |
Johnson et al., “Comparative Abuse Liability of GHB and Ethanol in Humans”, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2013, pp. 112-123, vol. 21, No. 2. |
Jones et al., “Concentration-Time Profiles of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate in Blood After Recreational Doses are Best Described by Zero-Order Rather Than First-Order Kinetics”, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2009, pp. 332-335, vol. 33. |
Kallweit et al., “Pharmacological management of narcolepsy with and without cataplexy”, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2017, pp. 809-817, vol. 18, No. 8. |
Keating, “Sodium Oxybate: A Review of Its Use in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome and in the Maintenance of Abstinence in Alcohol Dependence”, Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, pp. 63-80, vol. 34. |
Khatami et al., “The European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) database”, J Sleep Res., 2016, pp. 356-364, vol. 25. |
Kollb-Sielecka et al., “The European Medicines Agency Review of pitolisant for treatment of narcolepsy: summary of the scientific assessment by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, pp. 125-129, vol. 33. |
Kornum et al., “Narcolepsy”, Nature Reviews/Disease Primers, 2017, Article No. 16100, pp. 1-19, vol. 3. |
Kovalska et al., “Narcolepsy with cataplexy in patients aged over 60 years: a case-control study”, Sleep Medicine, 2016, pp. 79-84, vol. 26. |
Kovalska et al., “Higher body mass index in narcolepsy with cataplexy: lifelong experience”, Sleep Medicine, 2017, p. 277, vol. 32. |
Krahn, “Understanding the needs of older patients with narcolepsy”, Sleep Medicine, 2016, p. 85, vol. 26. |
Kristoffersen et al., “Determination of safety margins for whole blood concentrations of alcohol and nineteen drugs in driving under the influence cases”, Forensic Science International, 2016, pp. 119-126, vol. 259. |
Lam et al., “Monocarboxylate Transporter-Mediated Transport of γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Human Intestinal Caco-2 Cells”, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2010, pp. 441-447, vol. 38, No. 3. |
Lecendreux et al., “Narcolepsy Type 1 Is Associated with a Systemic Increase and Activation of Regulatory T Cells and with a Systemic Activation of Global T Cells”, PLoS One, 2017, e0169836, pp. 1-14. |
Lernmark, “Environmental factors in the etiology of type 1 diabetes, celiac disease and narcolepsy”, Pediatric Diabetes, 2016, pp. 65-72, vol. 17 (Suppl 22). |
Liakoni et al., “Presentations to an urban emergency department in Switzerland due to acute γ-hydroxybutyrate toxicity”, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2016, pp. 1-9, vol. 24. |
Liechti et al., “Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of γ-hydroxybutyrate in healthy subjects”, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016, pp. 980-988, vol. 81. |
Lin et al., “Human Monocarboxylate Transporter 2 (MCT2) Is a High Affinity Pyruvate Transporter”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1998, pp. 28959-28965, vol. 273, No. 44. |
Lingford-Hughes et al., “Improving GHB withdrawal with baclofen: study protocol for a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial”, Trials, 2016, pp. 1-11, vol. 17. |
Linselle et al., “Can drugs induce or aggravate Sleep Apneas? A case non case Study in Vigibase®, the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database”, Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2017, pp. 359-366, vol. 31, No. 3. |
Maitre et al., “Mechanisms for the Specific Properties of γ-Hydroxybutyrate in Brain”, Medicinal Research Reviews, 2016, pp. 363-388, vol. 36. |
Mamelak et al., “A Pilot Study on the Effects of Sodium Oxybate on Sleep Architecture and Daytime Alertness in Narcolepsy”, Sleep, 2004, pp. 1327-1334, vol. 27, No. 7. |
Maresova et al., “Treatment cost of narcolepsy with cataplexy in Central Europe”, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2016, pp. 1709-1715, vol. 12. |
Martinez-Orozco et al., “Comorbidity of Narcolepsy Type 1 With Autoimmune Diseases and Other Immunopathological Disorders: A Case-Control Study”, J Clin Med Res., 2016, pp. 495-505, vol. 8, No. 7. |
Mason et al., “Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) Intoxication”, Acad Emerg Med, 2002, pp. 730-739, vol. 9, No. 7. |
Mazarr-Proo et al., “Distribution of GHB in Tissues and Fluids Following a Fatal Overdose”, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2005, pp. 398-400, vol. 29. |
Mesmer et al., “Determination of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and Gamma-Butyrolactone (GBL) by HPLC/UV-VIS Spectrophotometry and HPLC/Thermospray Mass Spectrometry”, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1998, pp. 489-492, vol. 43, No. 3. |
Moresco et al., “Pharmacogenetics and Treatment Response in Narcolepsy Type 1: Relevance of the Polymorphisms of the Drug Transporter Gene ABCB1”, Clinical Neuropharmacology, 2016, pp. 18-23, vol. 39, No. 1. |
Morris et al., “Renal Clearance of γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Rats: Increasing Renal Elimination as a Detoxification Strategy”, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2005, pp. 1194-1202, vol. 313, No. 3. |
Morris et al., “Overview of the Proton-coupled MCT (SLC16A) Family of Transporters: Characterization, Function and Role in the Transport of the Drug of Abuse γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid”, The AAPS Journal, 2008, pp. 311-321, vol. 10, No. 2. |
Morse et al., “Effects of Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition on the Oral Toxicokinetics/Toxicodynamics of γ-Hydroxybutyrate and γ-Butyrolactone”, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2013, pp. 102-110, vol. 345. |
Nellore et al., “Narcolepsy and influenza vaccination—the inappropriate awakening of immunity”, Annals of Translational Medicine, 2016, S29, pp. 1-6, vol. 4 (Suppl 1). |
Okun et al., “GHB: An Important Pharmacologic and Clinical Update”, J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci., 2001, pp. 167-175, vol. 4, No. 2. |
Palatini et al., “Dose-dependent absorption and elimination of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid in healthy volunteers”, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1993, pp. 353-356, vol. 45. |
Pardi et al., “γ-Hydroxybutyrate/Sodium Oxybate; Neurobiology, and Impact on Sleep and Wakefulness”, CNS Drugs, 2006, pp. 993-1018, vol. 20, No. 12. |
Raybon et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid during Tolerance in Rats: Effects on Extracellular Dopamine”, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2007, pp. 1252-1260, vol. 320, No. 3. |
Ritzhaupt et al., “The characterization of butyrate transport across pig and human colonic luminal membrane”, Journal of Physiology, 1998, pp. 819-830, vol. 507.3. |
Roth et al., “Effect of sodium oxybate on disrupted nighttime sleep in patients with narcolepsy”, Journal of Sleep Research, 2017, pp. 407-414, vol. 26. |
Russell et al., “Sodium Oxybate Relieves Pain and Improves Function in Fibromyalgia Syndrome. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial”, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2009, pp. 299-309, vol. 60, No. 1. |
Russell et al., “Sodium oxybate reduces pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance and improves functionality in fibromyalgia: results from a 14-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study”, Pain, 2011, pp. 1007-1017, vol. 152, No. 5. |
Scharf et al., “Pharmacokinetics of Gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) in Narcoleptic Patients”, Sleep, 1998, pp. 507-514, vol. 21, No. 5. |
Strand et al., “Driving Under the Influence of Non-Alcohol Drugs—An Update. Part II: Experimental Studies”, Forensic Science Review, 2016, pp. 100-101, vol. 28, No. 2. |
Susta et al., “Emotion stimulus processing in narcolepsy with cataplexy”, J Sleep Res., 2017, pp. 30-37, vol. 26. |
Thorpy M.J., “Update on Therapy for Narcolepsy” Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2015, 17(20), pp. 1-12. |
Chen., et al., “Pharmacokinetics, Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of JZP-258 and Sodium Oxybate: Results of two Phase 1, Open-Label, randomised crossover studies in healthy volunteers,” Sleep Medicine, Abstracts, 2019, vol. 64, pp. S65-S66. |
Erowid, “Gamma-hydroxybutyrnte (GHB) Basic Synthesis Procedure,” Retrieved from the internet URL: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/ghb/ghb_synthesis.shtml (as downloaded on Aug. 8, 2013) 2 pages. |
Fides, “Solutions of 4-hydrox-ybutyric acid salts for injection,” Chem Abstract ES302338. Laboratorio M. Cuatecases, S.A., 2011. 1 page. |
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., “Xyrem® (sodium oxybate) oral solution Prescribing Information,” Xyrem® US Package Insert available at http://pp.jazzpliamia.com/pi/xyem.en.USPI.pdf (downloaded Sep. 12, 2017, 32 pages. |
Jha M.K., “Modified Release Formulations to Achieve the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP),” IJPSR, 2012, vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 2376-2386. |
Leu-Semenescu., et al., “Benefits and risk of sodium oxybate in idiopathic hypersomnia versus narcolepsy type 1: a chart review,” Sleep Medicine, Jan. 2016, vol. 17, pp. 38-44. |
Morrison, Robert T., et al., “Organic Chemistry”, Chapter 20: “Functional Derivatives of Carboxylic Acids,” 3rd Edition, 1973, pp. 658-700. |
Office Action for Argentina Patent Application No. 20170102053, dated Nov. 9, 2021, 5 Pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020055505, dated Oct. 28, 2021, 11 Pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 3084120, dated Aug. 26, 2021, 5 Pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880082447.4, dated Oct. 12, 2021, 20 Pages. |
Rujivipat., et al., “Improved Drug Delivery to the Lower Intestinal Tract with Tablets Compression-Coated with Enteric/Nonenteric Polymer Powder Blends,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2010, vol. 76, pp. 486-492. |
Scammell T.E., “Narcolepsy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Dec. 31, 2015, vol. 373, No. 27, pp. 2654-2662. |
Vogel., et al., “Toxicologic/transport properties of NCS-382, a y-hydroxybutyratc (GHB) receptor ligand, in neuronal and epithelial cells: Therapeutic implications for SSADH deficiency, a GABA metabolic disorder,” Toxicol in Vitro, 2018, vol. 46, pp. 203-212. |
Chemical Book, CAS DataBase List, Ethyl cellulose, downloaded in Oct. 2021, 5 Pages, (Year: 2021). |
Fallingborg J., “Intraluminal pH of the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” Danish Medical Bulletin, Jun. 1999, vol. 46 (3), pp. 183-196. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/322,299, dated Oct. 25, 2021, 28 pages. |
Jefferies, Flamel Technologies SA publication, https://www.jefferies.com/CMSFiles/Jefferies.com/files/Flamel.pdf, May 1, 2015, 1 Page. |
Martin John., “Capsule Endoscopy: How Long Does it Take to Pass,” Pill Cam, https://www.topdoctors.eo.uk/medical-articles/capsule-endoscopy-how-long-does-it-take-to-pass, Oct. 5, 2019, 4 Pages. |
Momenzadeh S., et al., “Evaluation of in Vivo Transfection Efficiency of Eudragit Coated Nanoparticles of Chitosan-DNA: A pH-sensitive System Prepared for Oral DNA Delivery,” Iran Red Crescent Med J, Apr. 2015, vol. 17, No. 4, DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.16761, 7 Pages. |
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/484,916, dated Nov. 10, 2021, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated Dec. 11, 2018, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/655,924, dated Nov. 13, 2018, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated May 1, 2020, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/281,235, dated Jun. 26, 2020, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,516, dated Mar. 10, 2021, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,633, dated Jun. 9, 2021, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/987,510, dated Jan. 13, 2021, 8 pages. |
Goyanes A., et al., “Gastrointestinal Release Behaviour of Modified-Release Drug Products: Dynamic Dissolution Testing of Mesalazine Formulations,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2015, vol. 484, No. 1-2, pp. 103-108, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1462647/3/Basit.1462647_5-ASA.pdf. |
Office Action for European Patent Application No. 17742441.3, dated Mar. 11, 2022, 7 Pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020055505, dated Feb. 21, 2022, 11 Pages. |
“Pharma Excipients,” Eudragit® L 100-55, Description, Additional Information, Mar. 2022, 2 pages, Retrieved from the internet URL: https://www.pharmaexcipients.com/product/eudragit-l-100-55/. |
FDA: “Impurities in New Drug Products,” Guidance for Industry Q3B(R2), Aug. 2006, Revision 3, 18 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: https://www.fda.gov/media/71733/download. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/984,645, dated Mar. 4, 2022, 51 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/484,916 dated Feb. 15, 2022, 47 Pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/322,299 dated Mar. 15, 2022, 37 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,366 dated Apr. 27, 2022, 24 pages. |
Pai M.P., et al., “Drug Dosing Based on Weight and Body Surface Area: Mathematical Assumptions and Limitations in Obese Adults,” Pharmacotherapy, Sep. 2012, vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 856-868. |
Kothare S.V., et al., “Pharmacotherapy of Narcolepsy: Focus on Sodium Oxybate,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 37-52. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,192 dated May 19, 2022, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/666,205 dated May 13, 2022, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200276142 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62812699 | Mar 2019 | US | |
62857008 | Jun 2019 | US |