The present invention relates to a gantry for particle therapy.
In proton therapy and ion therapy often use is made of a gantry to direct the incident beam from the most optimal angle towards the target (usually a tumor) in the patient. A gantry is a beam transport system (usually comprising magnets) mounted on a mechanical structure that can rotate around the patient who is positioned—often lying but in some cases also sitting on a dedicated treatment table/chair located—at the treatment position. Usually, the rotation range of the gantry is a bit more than 360 degrees, but in some gantries also a bit more than only 180 degrees is used to save space and allow accessing the treatment table/chair at any time during the treatment. Examples for typical rotatable gantries used for proton therapy are disclosed in the European Patent Application 15 194 795.9 and in the International Patent Application WO 2013/149945 A1.
The rotatable gantries deliver the dose to be deposited into a cancerous tumor volume at pencil beam resolution for various gantry-orientations which enable a precise dose accumulation in this tumor volume coincidently preventing healthy tissue in the surrounding of the tumor volume from damage due to the beam stopping effect which materializes in the so-called Bragg Peak. Nevertheless, these gantries of the form of a C-arm require a considerable space to allow its rotation of a system that involves the weight of ten of tons. At each gantry angle a very accurate positioning of the beam delivery components (in particular the sweeper magnets and the last beam bending magnet(s)) is needed in order to obtain the desired beam characteristics, like the beam energy and beam position and beam direction.
It is therefore the objective of the present invention to provide a system that replaces the current rotatable gantries for particle beam therapy and that provides a significantly simpler set-up and allowing at least the flexibility in beam delivery known from the prior art gantries. Compared to the currently used rotatable gantries the advantages of the present invention shall also provide a lower weight of the system and a smaller space needed.
This objective is achieved according to the present invention by a system for particle beam therapy, comprising as seen in the flow direction of the particle beam:
The advantages of this system layout are a reduction of the treatment room footprint with respect to that of a conventional gantry according to the prior art and a very simple mechanical construction to move second beam bending section up and down. Further, it is possible to mount a degrader and/or a beam scanning system in the beam transport section between the first beam bending section and the second beam bending section whereas the scanning system may be mounted in the nozzle downstream of the second beam bending section. Furthermore, compared with conventional gantries two rotational axes allow additional freedom in the choice of how a treatment angle is constructed and how the eventual misalignments can be corrected.
With respect to a geometrical set-up of the system that can be easily implemented and/or maintained, i.e. for quality control, the following basic settings can be chosen:
These settings allow to “play” with the beam orientation according to the needs and demands of the therapy plan and to get back easily to one of the position according to the basic settings a) to d). The settings therefore allow an extension of the range of Φ2 into [180°; +180°]
The tilting angle of Φ2 can preferably range from 0° to +180°, so that the isocenter and the patient table/chair are always at the same side of the gantry. In this way, the footprint of the gantry is minimized.
In order to realize a mechanical set-up that can be controlled in a non-complicated way, the tilting mechanism may comprise a telescope arm or a lifting mechanism based on one or two chains along the lifting arm.
Further, the beam transport section may comprise a telescope section, too. This enables the operator during the tilting to maintain the position in terms of the point (isocenter of the system) of the beam passing through the horizontal plane. Herein, it is suitable when the beam transport section can be adjustable in length in order to compensate the change in the horizontal component of the gantry due to the tilting. In this way, the isocenter will be located on a straight line, perpendicular to the direction of the beam after the first bending section.
At some installations it might not be possible to deliver the particle beam right in the direction required for the first and/or second bending section. It is therefore helpful when the first beam bending section may comprise a set of magnets that also deflect in the horizontal plane. The first bending section itself can also rotate mechanically over an axis that coincides with the incoming beam direction. The combination of the 90 degrees deflection due to the magnetic fields in the first bending section and the mechanical rotation of the first beam bending section defines the gantry's first angle Φ1. Therefore, the first beam bending section is capable to bend the beam not only in the direction given by the first angle Φ1 but also into a further direction, i.e. within the horizontal plane in which the beam is delivered after its generation, i.e. in a cyclotron.
In a preferred embodiment the system may additionally comprise a beam spreading system to spread the beam in the lateral direction, which is perpendicular to the direction of the beam leaving the second bending section. The beam spreading system can comprise a scattering system that increases the beam diameter and/or a system of fast deflection magnets that scan the beam in the transversal direction. The beam spreading system can be collated before (upstream of) or behind (downstream of) the second bending section.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are hereinafter described in more detail with reference to the attached drawings which depict in:
Further, a second bending section 18 and a beam nozzle 20 can be rotated by a rotation mechanism 26 being disposed in a way that the second beam bending section 18 and the beam nozzle 20 being rotatable by an angle Φ2, Φ2ε[−180°; +180°] around a direction given by the angle Φ1, but preferably Φ2ε[0°; +180°], to limit the footprint of the gantry.
In addition, a beam transport section 16 connecting the first beam bending section 8 to the second bending section 18 can be telescopically adjustable with respect to the length of this beam transport section 16 and allows a variation in length of approximately 0.5 m.
In the shown example, the second beam bending section 18 bends the beam by a fixed angle in the range of 90-135 degrees. This second bending section 18 is rotatable along an axis that approximately equals the direction given by Φ1 of the unscanned (or central) beam entering the second beam bending section 18. This rotation angle Φ2 covers at least 180 degrees, between 0 degr. (aiming the beam downwards) and +180 degr (aiming upwards). The appropriate value for Φ2 is a function of Φ1. The combination of Φ1 and Φ2 determines the incident angle of the beam direction at the patient.
The following three main incident direction can be established:
In all orientations small deviations can be added to Φ1 and Φ2 by small bending magnets (steering magnets) for fine tuning the incident angle at the patient. A nozzle 20 at the exit of the second bending section 18 can comprise equipment to verify the applied dose and the beam characteristics. A patient table 22 is part of a positioning system that can shift and rotate the patient position in the horizontal plane. The range of this adjustment must be large enough to compensate the motion of the isocenter as a function of Φ1 and Φ2.
In order to have a common understanding on the direction, the following definitions are applied:
The components from the beam transport section 16 until and including the second beam bending section 18 are mounted such that these are always aligned in a mechanical stable or corrected position. The isocenter position is not fixed in space and moves along a curve in the horizontal plane as a function of Φ1. The shape of this curve depends on whether use is made of the option to have an adjustable (telescopable) length of the beam transfer section 16 which is located between the first beam bending section 10 and the second beam bending section 18. In that case, the length of this beam transport section 16 is a function of Φ1. This option enables that the isocenter position moves along a straight line in the horizontal plane. This is advantageous for daily checks and in connection to imaging devices that verify the patients positioning with respect to the gantry. However, with appropriate tools for these checks, a curved trajectory of the isocenter position as a function of Φ1 and Φ2 is also possible.
The second beam bending section 18 can be designed such that it rotates over a Φ2 range of >360 degrees or >180 degrees. The 180 degrees version has major advantages, such as a smaller treatment room, less moving range of the patient table 22 and easier rotation construction. This is the version shown in the figures.
Possible advantages of here proposed mechanical layout are:
In a preferred embodiment, the system 2 may additionally comprise a beam spreading system 30 to spread the beam in the lateral direction, which is perpendicular to the direction of the beam leaving the second bending section 18. The beam spreading system 30 can comprise a scattering system 32 that increases the beam diameter and/or a system of fast deflection magnets 34 that scan the beam in the transversal direction. The beam spreading system 30 can be collated before 36 (upstream of) or behind 38 (downstream of) the second bending section 18.
The first beam bending section 8′ is followed by the beam transport section 16 receiving the particle beam 4 leaving the first beam bending section 8′ and guiding the particle beam 4 to a second beam bending section 18. The beam transport section 16 may comprise further equipment for the beam diagnosis and sweeper magnets as for example known from the WO 2013/149945 A1.
The second beam bending section 18 comprises a number of beam deflection magnets and/or beam focusing magnets in order to deliver the particle beam 4 via the beam nozzle 20 comprising a window for the exit of the particle beam 4 out of the gantry 10′ to the patient table 22. The patient table 22 could also comprise a patient chair allowing a patient to be treated in upright position. The patient table/chair 22 is rotatable and/or shiftable in the horizontal plane (given here by the x-and y-axis). Optionally, the patient table/chair may be adjustable vertically, too.
In the present example, the gantry 10′ is supported by the tilting mechanism 24 allowing the gantry 10′ to be tilted vertically (along the z-axis, in the yz-plane) by a first angle Φ1, Φ1ε[−90°; +90°], wherein the gantry 10′ comprises the rotation bearing (pivot) 7′ being disposed at the entrance of the beam coupling section 6 in order to enable a rotation of the complete gantry 10′ along the x-axis. Further, the second bending section 18 and the beam nozzle 20 can be rotated by the rotation mechanism 26 being disposed in a way that the second beam bending section 18 and the beam nozzle 20 being rotatable by an angle Φ2, Φ2ε[−180°; +180°], but preferably Φ2ε[0°; +180°] in order to limit the footprint of the gantry 10′) around a direction given by the angle Φ1.
Typically, the range of the first angle Φ1 depends on the design of the system 2′. For the system 2′, the range of the first angle Φ1 can typically be between approximately −40° and +40°. After the first bending section 8′ the out-coming beam 4 is aimed into the Φ1-direction with respect to the horizontal plane: downwards when Φ1<0 and upwards when Φ1>0. Due to the bending in the horizontal plane, the first bending section 8′ can be designed such that it can also serve as an energy selection system.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16183296 | Aug 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/065100 | 6/20/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/028863 | 2/15/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5345632 | Langenaeken et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
9302123 | Amelia | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20030141460 | Kraft | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20070051904 | Kaiser | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20110150186 | Ziegler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20140357930 | Amelia | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2886158 | Jun 2015 | EP |
3167933 | May 2017 | EP |
H05168623 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H06214100 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2001178834 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2015500719 | Jan 2015 | JP |
0074779 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2013149945 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190184201 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |