In a principal aspect the present invention relates to a strut for use in combination with a door panel such as with the panel of a multi-panel folding garage door.
Folding garage doors are typically constructed from a plurality of generally rectangular panels which are hinged so that they articulate with respect to one another as they are moved between a door closed and a door open position. The door panels are generally mounted on tracks positioned on opposite sides of the door opening. The tracks extend upwardly and inwardly into the interior of the garage enclosure. Thus the door panels may be attached by means of rollers to the tracks so that the door may be raised or lowered. As the door is raised or lowered, the panels articulate one with respect to the other and follow the tracks between the closed position and the open position.
In certain geographical regions, particularly in regions where environmental conditions demand, doors are required pursuant to building codes to withstand significant forces. For example, in Florida where hurricanes are prevalent, garage doors as well as other doors for enclosures are required to meet certain building code wind resistance standards in order to qualify for installation in buildings. The standards typically require that garage doors withstand wind gusts in excess of 100 mph. State and local agencies often require testing to verify compliance with building code standards. The State of Florida code is an example and a discussion of the applicable codes for garage doors in South Florida can be found at http://www.ehow.com/list—6828855_south-building-codes-garage-doors.html#ixzz0z53VQd6q which is incorporated herein by reference.
A means for providing a garage door that meets building code standards is to provide reinforcements for the door panels. Such reinforcements may comprise struts or trusses which are attached to the inside face of the door panels. The placement, design and number of such reinforcing elements may vary. However, a uniform objective is to provide means for enhancing the structural integrity of such doors.
Heretofore, various patents have been granted which disclose construction reinforcement techniques such as struts for the purpose of reinforcing folding panels including the following: U.S. Pat. No. 5,749,407 entitled “Folding Garage Door With Reinforcing Struts”, issued on May 12, 1998; U.S. Pat. No. 2,196,399 entitled “Switchboard Construction”, issued on Apr. 9, 1940; U.S. Pat. No. 2,863,503 entitled “Sectional Door of the Vertically Opening Horizontally Hinged Type”, issued on Dec. 9, 1958; U.S. Pat. No. 2,966,212 entitled “Extra Wide Vertically Sliding Doors”, issued on Dec. 27, 1960; U.S. Pat. No. 3,010,547 entitled “Prefabricated Building”, issued on Nov. 28, 1961; U.S. Pat. No. 3,180,460 entitled “Floor Panel for Elevated Flooring”, issued on Apr. 27, 1965; U.S. Pat. No. 3,443,625 entitled “Reinforced Collapsible Door”, issued on May 13, 1969; U.S. Pat. No. 3,516,474 entitled “Door Brace Structure”, issued on Jun. 23, 1970; U.S. Pat. No. 3,608,613 entitled “Sliding Door”, issued on Sep. 28, 1971; U.S. Pat. No. 3,740,916 entitled “Panel Construction”, issued on Jun. 26, 1973; U.S. Pat. No. 3,891,021 entitled “Garage Door with Rolled Overlapping Joint for Adjacent Panels”, issued on Jun. 24, 1975; U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,003 entitled “Door Stiffener”, issued Oct. 7, 1975; U.S. Pat. No. 4,378,043 entitled Pivoting Screen Panel for Sectional Garage Door, issued Mar. 29, 1983; U.S. Pat. No. 4,385,476 entitled “Web Stiffener for Light-Gauge Metal Framing Members”, issued on May 31, 1983; U.S. Pat. No. 4,934,439 entitled “Tension Strut Apparatus and Method for an Overhead Garage Door”, issued on Jun. 19, 1990; U.S. Pat. No. 4,982,545 entitled “Economical Steel Roof Truss”, issued on Jan. 8, 1991 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,588,270 entitled “Garage Door Brace”, issued Dec. 31, 1996.
The utilization of struts of the type disclosed in the above-identified references and otherwise available in the marketplace accomplishes the function of enhancing the structural integrity of door panels. Nonetheless there has remained a need to provide improved struts and strut constructions which meet a number of criteria. First, the amount of material allocated to the strut should be minimized in order to reduce the weight of the reinforcing strut. Second, such struts should be resistant to tensile as well as torsional forces. Third such struts should be easily incorporated with existing folding door panel constructions. Fourth such struts should be inexpensive, easy to install, easy to replace and compact in order to avoid misuse of space within the interior of a building enclosure due to unnecessary intrusion of the reinforcing strut construction. Fifth, such struts should enable doors and door panels to meet or exceed code requirements.
These and other objects, advantages and features comprise incentives for the development of the present invention.
Briefly the present invention comprises a strut for reinforcement of panels such as folding garage door panels. The strut is configured to be applied or fastened to the inside surface or face of such a door panel. The purpose of the strut is to reinforce the door panels and thus the door to effectively resist the forces of environmental occurrences such as hurricanes.
The strut is typically made from sheet metal in the form of an elongate beam comprised of a top wall joined to opposed, spaced side walls with a medial plane of symmetry defined between the side walls. The strut structure is thus substantially identical in form on the opposite sides of the plane of symmetry. Each side wall includes a longitudinal rib. The side walls diverge from each other and constitute truncated sections an isosceles triangle having an included angle of divergence in the range of about 5 to 15°. The top part or edges of the truncated wall sections are connected by a cross wall that includes longitudinal spaced pylons positioned at the top edge of each of the diverging side walls. The two pylons are joined by a flat, planar, cross wall section transverse to the medial plane of symmetry.
The bottom edge of each of the side walls connects to a flat planar plate member extending outwardly therefrom with an upwardly extending, outer lip. Each flat planar side plate member forms an angle in the range of about 80 to 87°±1° with respect to the respective connected side wall member. The upwardly extending, outer lip on the outer edge of each of the planar plate members forms an obtuse angle with the respective plate member. The plane of the plate members between the bottom edges of each side wall constitutes the third side of a truncated, isosceles triangle defined by the side walls. Dimensional relationships and characteristics are disclosed which enable that the strut to provide improved resistance to forces resulting from, for example, environmental forces on a door panel and/or door to which the strut is attached.
A longitudinal, auxiliary truss may be fastened to the cross wall section between the pylons. The truss is typically symmetrical in cross section about the plane of symmetry.
Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide an improved strut construction for attachment to a panel such as a garage door panel of a folding garage door.
A further object of the invention is to provide a strut construction mounted on a panel which provides deformation resistance to wind and other forces by virtue of a design which enjoys significant structural integrity relative to various known strut constructions.
Another object of the invention is to provide a strut which is easy to manufacture, easy to incorporate or combine with existing garage door panel designs, inexpensive and compact yet adequately strong.
These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description which follows.
In the detailed description which follows, reference will be made to the drawing comprised of the following figures:
Referring to
Typically strut 20 as depicted in
The strut 20 has a uniform cross section, for example, as depicted in
The first side wall 22 and the second side wall 24 form truncated parts or sides of an isosceles triangle wherein the side walls 22 and 24 are truncated portions of the equal sides of an isosceles triangle forming an angle of divergence in the range of about at least about 5° and typically no more than about 12° to 15°. The first side wall 22 includes a first lower edge 44 laterally spaced from a second lower edge 46 of the second side wall 24. The span between the first lower edge 44 and the second lower edge 46 defines a virtual third leg of an isosceles triangle further defined by the first side wall 22 and the second side wall 24. The first lower edge 44 is joined to an outwardly extending flat planar plate member 48 which is co-planar with a second flat planar plate member 50 extending outwardly from the second lower edge 46. Each of the first and second plate members 48 and 50 include an upwardly extending outer lip; namely, first lip 52 and second lip 54 respectively. The lips 52 and 54 form an obtuse angle with the respective first plate member 48 and second plate member 50 in the range of about 95±1° in a typical strut construction.
Among the features deemed desirable with respect to the strut construction depicted are the following. First, the width of pylons 34 and 38 is substantially the same and cumulatively comprises about 25% to 40% of the width and most desirably about 35% of the spacing between the top edges 28 and 30. Second, the ribs 40 and 42 are preferably positioned inward with respect to the flat plane of planar side walls 22 and 24. Further, the ribs 40 and 42 have a dimension spaced from the respective top edges 28, 30 equal to the or nearly equal to the dimension of the width of each of the ribs 40, 42. Third, the ribs 40 and 42 are in the upper portion of the strut 20 more closely adjacent to the cross wall 32. The centroid in the X and Y planes lies on the vertical Y plane or axis of symmetry 26 approximately in the range of 35 to 45% of the distance from the top of the pylons 34 and 38. That is, the centroid is closer to the top of each of the pylons 34 and 38 than it is to each of the plate members 48 and 50. The section modulus about the y-axis is increased due to the larger moment of inertia about the y-axis which is a result of the profile of the strut. The extra width of cross wall 32 is an important reason for an improved moment of inertia about the y-axis.
Fourth, the spacing of the pylons 34, 38 becomes an important feature inasmuch as it enables the utilization of an option U-bar truss 56 which may be positioned in and upon attached to the intermediate wall 36 as illustrated in
Fifth, the spacing of the top edges 28 and 32 relative to the dimension of the spacing of the outside edges of lateral side plate members 48, 50 is in the range of a ratio from 1 to about 1.6.
Referring to
Typically a strut such as strut 20 in
The strut 20 with or without a U-bar truss 56 is generally applied or attached by fasteners to the inside or backside of panel surface of a panel 74 as depicted. Multiple parallel struts 20 of the type disclosed may be used on a single panel 74. Various patterns of struts 20 may be applied to one or more panels 74 in a multi panel door configuration. Such struts may or may not include a U-bar truss 56. One or more struts 20 may include such a U-bar truss 56. Further, the struts 20 will typically extend the entire distance intermediate and between the lateral sides 76 and 78 of a panel 74. However, the strut 20 may extend only partially over such a span of a panel 74 or may extend beyond a span distance defined by the lateral sides 76 and 78 depending upon the desires or the user of the strut 20. Such struts are generally of uniform cross-section along their length, but the cross-section may be varied in some circumstances. Struts 20 may be arranged in various angles or in a geometric configuration on a panel. The general dimensions of the strut 20 may be varied and typical dimensional characteristics of a typical strut 20 are set forth in
Deflection testing of a strut 20 of the type depicted in
The particular design such as depicted in
Ix=1.311 in4
Iy=1.163 in4
The exemplary strut configuration of
Variations of the invention are possible without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. For example, the strut material, the dimensional characteristics, the positioning of certain features such as the ribs 40 and 42, the number of ribs, the dimensions of the pylons, and other features may be varied without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Features which characterize of the strut of the invention are, in particular, the diverging side walls and the angular relationships between the various component parts of the strut. Thus, while there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, it is to be understood that the invention is limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2196399 | Rubel | Apr 1940 | A |
2525309 | Norberg | Oct 1950 | A |
2863503 | Stroup | Dec 1958 | A |
2966212 | Fimbel, Jr. | Dec 1960 | A |
3010547 | Foster | Nov 1961 | A |
3180460 | Liskey, Jr. | Apr 1965 | A |
3376913 | Clapsaddle | Apr 1968 | A |
3443625 | Moser et al. | May 1969 | A |
3516474 | Pemberton et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3608613 | Halliwell | Sep 1971 | A |
3740916 | Kenaga | Jun 1973 | A |
3891021 | Geoffrey | Jun 1975 | A |
3910003 | Jerila | Oct 1975 | A |
3941180 | Thill | Mar 1976 | A |
3967761 | Melton, Jr. et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4156448 | Bengtsson | May 1979 | A |
4284119 | Martin et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4378043 | Sorenson | Mar 1983 | A |
4385476 | Slager | May 1983 | A |
4644725 | Schijf | Feb 1987 | A |
4893666 | Hormann | Jan 1990 | A |
4934439 | Martin | Jun 1990 | A |
4982545 | Stromback | Jan 1991 | A |
5002114 | Hormann | Mar 1991 | A |
5129441 | Leist et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5148850 | Urbanick | Sep 1992 | A |
5170832 | Wagner | Dec 1992 | A |
5188163 | Schwartzengraber et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5235724 | Perrin et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5359812 | Mayfield | Nov 1994 | A |
5588270 | Keating | Dec 1996 | A |
5749407 | Brenner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5782283 | Kendall | Jul 1998 | A |
6041478 | Martin | Mar 2000 | A |
6062293 | Berger, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6082429 | Ochoa | Jul 2000 | A |
6161606 | Wegner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6250361 | Ochoa | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6330901 | Friesen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6408926 | Hoofard et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6527036 | Welsh | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6578619 | Wright | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6629387 | Whitley et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6772818 | Whitley et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
Raynor U-bar punching layout, Feb. 28, 2005, p. 1. |
Chi, Chi drawing: Z6-1808-66100, Sep. 22, 2008, pp. 1-2. |
Minnesota Metals, Inc., Minnesota Metals, p. 1, 2009. |
Richards-Wilcox, Linear Face Hardware—Tuss Profiles, Sep. 20, 2005, p. 1. |
Martin Finger Shield TM Garage Door, Woodline Series with Windows—16′ wide—large Missile Impact Resistant—Nov. 5, 2008, pp. 1-6. |
Overhead Door, Windload, Banner 15.2/-20.5 PSF Design 18′ Max Wide, Dec. 22, 2008, pp. 1-2. |
Overhead Door, Windload, Banner 20.2/-22.5 PSF Design 18′-0″ max, Dec. 22, 2008, pp. 1-3. |
Arrow Tru-Line, Inc., CEE Channel & Struts, pp. 1-14, 2009. |
Windsor Republic Doors, Windload Residential Steel Door for IBC/FBC/IRC 130/140 MPH. Exposure “C”, Oct. 15, 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Amarr, Model #650 Oak Summit Series 1000 & 2000; Model #600 Stratford Series 1000 & 2000; Model #950 Heritage Series 1000 & 2000, Mar. 18, 2010, pp. 1-2. |
Horman LLC, Hurricane Door 16′x7′, Apr. 9, 2009, pp. 1-3. |
Mid-America Door Company, Windload Construction Details, Apr. 28, 2010, pp. 1-2. |
Clopay Building Products Company, 2-IN PAN +42/−48 16-2 × 16-0, Nov. 21, 1994, p. 1. |
doorLink Manufacturing, Inc., Windload Rated Residential Garage Door Models 510, 410, 430, 450, 470, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-2. |
DAB Door Company, Inc., 18′-2″ Wide. 16′ High Steel Sectional Garage Door with Window Lite Option, Mar. 18, 2009, pp. 1-8. |
South Florida Building Codes for Garage Doors, by Danielle Hill, eHow Contributor, Aug. 10, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
Factors to Consider When Choosing a Reinforced Garage Door, www.clopaydoor.com/wind-code0winload.aspx, Sep. 9, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
Florida Building Code, www.floridabuilding.org, 2008, pp. 1-5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120111508 A1 | May 2012 | US |