This invention relates to an expansion engine operating on the Brayton cycle to produce refrigeration at cryogenic temperatures.
A system that operates on the Brayton cycle to produce refrigeration consists of or includes a compressor that supplies gas at a discharge pressure to a heat exchanger, from which gas is admitted to an expansion space through an inlet valve, expands the gas adiabatically, exhausts the expanded gas (which is colder) through in outlet valve, circulates the cold gas through a load being cooled, then returns the gas through the heat exchanger to the compressor. U.S. Pat. No. 2,607,322 by S. C. Collins, a pioneer in this field, has a description of the design of an early expansion engine that has been widely used to liquefy helium. The expansion piston is driven in a reciprocating motion by a crank mechanism connected to a fly wheel and generator/motor. The intake valve is opened with the piston at the bottom of the stroke (minimum cold volume) and high pressure gas drives the piston up which causes the fly wheel speed to increase and drive the generator. The intake valve is closed before the piston reaches the top and the gas in the expansion space drops in pressure and temperature. At the top of the stroke the outlet valve opens and gas flows out as the piston is pushed down, driven by the fly wheel as it slows down. Depending on the size of the fly wheel it may continue to drive the generator/motor to output power or it may draw power as it acts as a motor.
Many subsequent engines have designs that are similar. All have atmospheric air acting on the warm end of the piston and have been designed primarily to liquefy helium. Return gas is near atmospheric pressure and supply pressure is approximately 10 to 15 atmospheres. Compressor input power is typically in the range of 15 to 50 kW. Lower power refrigerators typically operate on the GM, pulse tube, or Stirling cycles. Higher power refrigerators typically operate on the Brayton or Claude cycles using turbo-expanders. The lower power refrigerators use regenerator heat exchanges in which the gas flows back and forth through a packed bed, gas never leaving the cold end of the expander. This is in contrast to the Brayton cycle refrigerators that can distribute cold gas to a remote load.
There are two important thermodynamic factors to consider in the design of a Brayton expansion engine. The first is the ability to recover the work produced by the engine. In an ideal engine the Carnot principal states that the ratio of the ideal work input, Wi, to the cooling produced, Q, is proportional to (Ta−Tc)/Tc if work is recovered, Ta being ambient temperature and Tc being the cold temperature, and is proportional to Ta/Tc if work is not recovered. For an ambient temperature of 300K and a cold temperature of 4K the loss without work recovery is 1.4%. For Tc=80K the loss is 27%. The second loss is due to the incomplete expansion of the gas. Ideally the cold inlet valve that admits gas at high pressure to the expansion space is closed and the piston continues to expand the gas until it reaches the low return pressure. For adiabatic expansion of helium from 2.2 MPa to 0.8 MPa 30% more cooling is available with complete expansion than with no expansion. Even expanding to 1.6 MPa provides an additional 16% of cooling.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,205,791 by J. L. Smith describes an expansion engine that has a free floating piston with working gas (helium) around the piston. Gas pressure above the piston, the warm end, is controlled by valves connected to two buffer volumes, one at a pressure that is at about 75% of the difference between high and low pressure, and the other at about 25% of the pressure difference. Electrically activated inlet, outlet, and buffer valves are timed to open and close so that the piston is driven up and down with a small pressure difference above and below the piston, so very little gas flows through the small clearance between the piston and cylinder. A position sensor in the piston provides a signal that is used to control the timing of opening and closing the four valves. If one thinks of a pulse tube as replacing a solid piston with a gas piston then the same “two buffer volume control” is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 5,481,878 by Zhu Shaowei.
FIG. 3 of the '878 Shaowei patent shows the timing of opening and closing the four control valves and FIG. 3 of the '791 Smith patent shows the favorable P-V diagram that can be achieved by good timing of the relationship between piston position and opening and closing of the control valves. The area of the P-V diagram is the work that is produced, and maximum efficiency is achieved by minimizing the amount of gas that is drawn into the expansion space between points 1 and 3 of the '791 FIG. 3 diagram relative to the P-V work, (which equals the refrigeration produced).
The timing of opening and closing the inlet and outlet valves relative to the position of the piston is important to achieve good efficiency. Most of the engines that have been built for liquefying helium have used cam actuated valves similar to those of the '220 Collins patent. The '791 Smith, patent show electrically actuated valves. Other mechanisms include a rotary valve on the end of a Scotch Yoke drive shaft as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,361,588 by H. Asami et al and a shuttle valve actuated by the piston drive shaft as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,372,128 by Sarcia. An example of a multi-ported rotary valve is found in U.S. patent application 2007/0119188 by M. Xu et al.
U.S. Ser. No. 61/313,868 dated Mar. 15, 2010 by R. C. Longsworth describes a reciprocating expansion engine operating on a Brayton cycle in which the piston has a drive stem at the warm end that is driven by a mechanical drive, or gas pressure that alternates between high and low pressures, and the pressure at the warm end of the piston in the area around the drive stem is essentially the same as the pressure at the cold end of the piston while the piston is moving. The pressure on the warm end of the piston is controlled by a pair of valves that connect the warm displaced volume to the low pressure line while the piston is moving towards the cold end, and to the high pressure line when the piston is moving towards the warm end. This provides some work recovery in the form of the low pressure gas that is drawn into the warm displaced volume being compressed and added to the gas in the high pressure line. Another means of maintaining a pressure on the warm end of the piston that is nearly the same as the pressure at the cold end while the piston is moving is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,776,534 by R. C. Longsworth. This expansion engine differs from the '868 application by replacing the valve at the warm end that connects the low pressure line to the warm displaced volume with one that connects the high pressure line to the displaced volume while the piston is moving toward the cold end. Another valve in parallel with that is added to rapidly pressurize the warm displaced volume while the piston is at the cold end. This has the advantage relative to the '868 application that no active valves are needed at the warm end but it has the disadvantage that there is no recovery of any of the power put out by the expansion of gas at the cold end.
Patent application Ser. No. 61/391,207 dated Oct. 8, 2010 by R. C. Longsworth describes the control of a reciprocating expansion engine operating on a Brayton cycle, as described in the previous applications, that enables it to minimize the time to cool a mass to cryogenic temperatures. These mechanisms can be used in the present application but are not described here.
The present invention improves the efficiency of the engines described in the '868 application and U.S. Pat. No. 8,776,534 by adding a buffer volume at the warm end to enable a partial expansion of the gas. A valve is added that connects the warm displaced volume to a buffer volume that is near an average pressure between the high and low pressures, which is a pressure between the high and low pressures (i.e., an intermediate pressure). This permits the cold inlet valve to be closed before the piston reaches the warm end and allows the piston to continue to move toward the warm end and expand the cold gas as the pressure at the warm end of the piston drops towards the average pressure or intermediate pressure in the buffer volume. Gas flows into the buffer volume during this phase of the cycle and flows out when the piston is at or near the cold end and before the cold inlet valve is opened or flows out before the cold inlet valve is opened.
The two embodiments of this invention that are shown in
Not shown is the option of replacing the pneumatic force on drive stem 2 with a mechanical force.
The valve timing diagram shown in
U.S. Pat. No. 8,783,045 by M. Xu et al describes a GM or a GM type pulse tube expander that uses a buffer volume connected to the warm end of the cylinder as a means to reduce the power input to the refrigerator. It does this by closing the supply valve from the compressor when the displacer reaches the top and then opening a valve to the buffer volume so the pressure drops towards the pressure in the buffer volume. The buffer valve is then closed and the valve that returns gas to the compressor is opened. Gas flows back to the cylinder from the buffer volume after the return valve is closed and before the supply valve is opened. The P-V diagram has to be rectangular, with no expansion or recompression, for this to reduce the flow to the expander each cycle. The GM and GM type pulse tubes have regenerators between the warm and cold displaced volumes thus there is never much of a pressure difference between the warm and cold ends. The Brayton piston on the other hand does not inherently have the same pressure on both ends of the piston. Expansion and recompression of the gas in a GM expander can be achieved by early closure of the supply and return valves but not by adding a buffer volume.
Adding a buffer volume to a gas balanced Brayton engine has a different effect than adding it to a GM or a GM type pulse tube expander. The Brayton engine produces more cooling per cycle because of the increase in the area of the P-V diagram. It is not obvious that this extra cooling can be provided by applying the buffer volume of '045 patent to the Brayton cycle engines U.S. Pat. No. 8,776,534 and application U.S. Ser. No. 61/313,868.
Table 1 provides an example of the refrigeration capacities that are calculated for pressures at Vci of 2.2 MPa and at Vco of 0.8 MPa. Helium flow rate from the compressor is 5.5 g/s. The piston diameter is 82.4 mm and the stroke is 25.4 mm. Heat-exchanger (HX) efficiency is assumed to be 98%. The refrigeration rates (Q) for engines 100 and 200 are based on the P-V diagram of
The percent increase in refrigeration due to the use of a buffer volume is more significant at lower temperatures because the heat exchanger loss is the same for engine 1 as for the prior engine. Some of the benefit of having more gas flow to the cold end in engine 2 relative to engine 1 is offset by more losses in the heat exchanger.
While expansion engines operating on the Brayton cycle have typically been used to produce refrigeration and liquefy gases at temperatures below 120K they can also be applied to cryopump water vapor at temperatures as high as 160K.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/035672 | 6/3/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/196898 | 12/8/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1462655 | Philip | Jul 1923 | A |
2607322 | Collins | Aug 1952 | A |
3010220 | Schueller | Nov 1961 | A |
3045436 | Gifford et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3119237 | Gifford | Jan 1964 | A |
3175373 | Holkeboer et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3205668 | Gifford | Sep 1965 | A |
3338063 | Hogan et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3613385 | Hogan et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3620029 | Longsworth | Nov 1971 | A |
3768273 | Missimer | Oct 1973 | A |
4132505 | Schuman | Jan 1979 | A |
4150549 | Longsworth | Apr 1979 | A |
4372128 | Sarcia | Feb 1983 | A |
4484458 | Longsworth | Nov 1984 | A |
4543794 | Matsutani et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4951471 | Sakitani et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4987743 | Lobb | Jan 1991 | A |
5094277 | Grant | Mar 1992 | A |
5181383 | Goto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5193348 | Schnapper | Mar 1993 | A |
5361588 | Asami | Nov 1994 | A |
5386708 | Kishorenath et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5387252 | Nagao | Feb 1995 | A |
5398512 | Inaguchi et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5461873 | Longsworth | Oct 1995 | A |
5481878 | Shaowei | Jan 1996 | A |
5582017 | Noji et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590533 | Asami et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5687574 | Longsworth et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6038866 | Okamoto et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6161392 | Jirnoa et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6205791 | Smith, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6256997 | Longsworth | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6347522 | Maguire et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374617 | Bonaquist et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415611 | Acharya et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438994 | Rashad et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6530237 | Morse et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6574978 | Flynn et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6625992 | Maguire et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6923009 | Kudaravalli | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7127901 | Dresens et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7249465 | Arman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
8448461 | Longsworth | May 2013 | B2 |
8776534 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783045 | Xu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9080794 | Longsworth | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9546647 | Longsworth | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20030233826 | Luo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050016187 | Kudaravalli | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070119188 | Xu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070214821 | Astra | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245749 | Atkins et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253854 | Dunn | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080092588 | Xu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100016168 | Atkins et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100275616 | Saji et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110219810 | Longsworth | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120017607 | Bin-Nun et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120085121 | Longsworth | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120227417 | Chao | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130008190 | Longsworth | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130067952 | Ri et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130285663 | Ri et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140290278 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150226465 | Longsworth | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150354865 | Longsworth | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1892931 | Jan 2007 | CN |
101109583 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101469689 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102290187 | Dec 2011 | CN |
31 09 681 | Sep 1982 | DE |
101 90 484 | Jun 2002 | DE |
11 2005 003 132 | Feb 2008 | DE |
11 2011 100 912 | Jan 2013 | DE |
0101565 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0919722 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2211124 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2 562 489 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2562489 | Feb 2013 | EP |
57-58302 | Apr 1982 | JP |
58-112305 | Jul 1983 | JP |
63-259357 | Oct 1988 | JP |
1-269874 | Oct 1989 | JP |
3-237276 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4-236069 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05079717 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-126426 | May 1993 | JP |
6-42405 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H06-042405 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-101917 | Apr 1994 | JP |
08-222429 | Aug 1996 | JP |
08-279412 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9-324958 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-089789 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11-63697 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-063697 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-248280 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-506584 | May 2000 | JP |
2001355929 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003-139427 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-523496 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005-28132 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006-274939 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006-275120 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2008-527308 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008249201 | Oct 2008 | JP |
5095417 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-522576 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2014-513269 | May 2014 | JP |
1325195 | Jul 1987 | SU |
9733671 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9733671 | Sep 1997 | WO |
2006075982 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2008094357 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008133965 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2011115790 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011132231 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012154299 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013006299 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
British Examination Report dated Mar. 8, 2018 for the Related British Patent Application No. GB1510022.5. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 26, 2013, from the corresponding PCT/US2012/048321. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2015 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523063. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2015 for the Corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201280074903.3. |
British Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2016 for the Corresponding British Patent Application No. GB1501346.9. |
Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2016 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523063. |
British Examination Report dated Aug. 5, 2016 for the Corresponding British Patent Application No. GB1501346.9. |
Japanese Office Action dated May 30, 2017 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523063. |
Korean Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2017 for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7004486. |
German Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2017 for the Corresponding German Patent Application No. 11 2012 006 734.7. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2017 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2017 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/693,486. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2018 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/693,486. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2018 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 5, 2017, from the corresponding PCT/US2016/035672. |
Korean Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2018 for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7004486. |
German Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2019 for the Corresponding German Patent Application No. 11 2012 006 734.7. |
Korean Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2018 for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2018-7018890. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2018 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/693,486. |
German Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2016 for the Corresponding German Patent Application No. 11 2014 000 403.0. |
Korean Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2015 for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7021208. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 4, 2012, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/044104. |
R. Khefer. Cryopumps-Refrigerators, Kriovakuumnaya tekhnika. Osnovy i primeneniya. Moskva, Energoatomizdat, 1983, p. 144-145. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2014 from corresponding Korean Application No. 10-2014-7001333, with English-language translation. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 26, 2015 for the Corresponding European Patent Application No. 12807347.5. |
European Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2015 for the Corresponding European Patent Application No. 12807347.5. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2016 for the Corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201280043152.9. |
European Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2016 for the Corresponding European Patent Application No. 12807347.5. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2019 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
Korean Office Action dated May 30, 2018 for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7004486. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2018 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523063. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 18, 2014, from the corresponding PCT/US2014/010054. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2016 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-552664. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2016 for the Corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201480004578.2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 17, 2012, from the corresponding PCT/US2011/054694. |
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,763. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2012 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/252,244. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2013 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/252,244. |
British Examination Report dated Sep. 13, 2018 for the Corresponding British Patent Application No. GB1510022.5. |
Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2018 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-552024. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2016, from the corresponding PCT/US2016/035672. |
Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2014 for the Corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201280043152.9. |
Specification and Drawings of U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,218 cited in the specification. |
C.B. Hood, et al. “Helium Refrigerators for Operation in the 10-30 K Range” Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, vol. 9, Plenum Press, New York (1964), pp. 496-506. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/655,853. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/655,853. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 26, 2017 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/655,853. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2014 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,635. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2015 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,635. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2015 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,635. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,635. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 22, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,635. |
German Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2017 for the Corresponding German Patent Application No. 11 2014 000 403.0. |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2018 for the Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523063. |
Korean Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2019 for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-7036607. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2019 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2019 for the Corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201680032147.6. |
German Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2019 for the Corresponding German Patent Application No. 11 2016 002 485.1. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
Korean Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2019, for the Corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7004486. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 5, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
British Examination Report dated May 1, 2020, for the Corresponding British Patent Application No. GB1716152.2. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2019 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/406,982. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180066878 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62170408 | Jun 2015 | US |