The present invention relates to gas cooking equipment and a method for producing the same. The gas cooking equipment has at least one gas burner and a control system for adjusting the heat output of the gas burner. The control system further has at least one control organ in a gas main leading to the gas burner which adjusts a gas throughput supplied to a burner nozzle and at least one secondary line running parallel to the control organ with an allocated shut-off organ for opening and closing the secondary line.
A generic cooking apparatus having a valve control arrangement in a gas supply pipe to a gas burner is known from EP 0 818 655. In the valve control arrangement the gas supply pipe branches into a number of part gas pipes switched in parallel, which are connected to the burner nozzle. A control valve for switching on and off the part gas stream flowing therethrough and a choke element for throttling the part gas stream flowing therethrough are arranged in each part gas pipe. A defined reduction of the gas flow can be implemented by combining certain switching elements which have been switched on and switched off. The maximum gas flow is achieved when all the choke elements are open.
The object of the present invention is to provide gas cooking equipment or a method for producing gas cooking equipment with at least one gas burner whose control system allows reliable operation of the burner.
The present invention provides gas cooking equipment having at least one secondary line switched in parallel to a control organ with the secondary line having a flow resistance which restricts the gas throughput in the secondary line. Said flow resistance is constructed as lower than the flow resistance formed by the burner nozzle. A pressure loss in the gas flow through the secondary line is thus substantially reduced. The substantially reduced pressure loss when the secondary line is open results in an improved primary air intake in the area of the burner nozzle. The flame formation at the gas burner is therefore substantially more reliable at high gas flow rates.
The flow resistance in the secondary line can be determined in various ways. In a simple realisation of the invention from the point of view of production technology, the determining flow resistance which restricts the gas throughput is determined by the smallest transmission cross-section in the secondary line. The smallest transmission cross-section in the secondary line is thus larger than the transmission cross-section of the burner nozzle.
It is advantageous if the secondary line is only opened to adjust the maximum gas throughput during operation of cooking equipment. The secondary line is therefore not used to adjust the part gas throughputs. In this case, the flow resistance in the secondary line can be reduced to a negligible amount compared with the flow resistance in the gas main. Thus, regardless of whether the control organ arranged in the gas main is opened or closed, the maximum gas throughput is always set when the secondary line is open.
The control system can preferably have a number of control lines switched in parallel to one another with corresponding control or regulating organs. These branch off the gas main and can each supply a part gas throughput to the burner nozzle. Compared to conventional gas taps, no hysteresis effects are obtained with such a control system. The control lines switched in parallel make it possible to adjust the part gas throughput substantially more accurately. The maximum gas throughput is set when all the control lines of the control system are opened. In this case, however, the pressure loss in the control system is substantially higher than that when a conventional completely opened gas tap is used. In this control system in particular, the pressure loss at maximum gas throughput can be effectively reduced by the secondary line according to the invention.
A control valve with an associated control choke can be provided in each of the control lines as shut-off or regulating organs. The control choke is used to restrict the gas throughput to a part gas throughput. In contrast to a proportional valve with continuous adjustment, the control valve merely has one closed and one opened position.
In order to reduce the flow resistance in the secondary line, the number of inserts in the secondary line, possibly the number of shut-off, control or regulating organs, is restricted to merely one unthrottled shut-off organ.
For reasons of space it is advantageous if the control lines are brought together in a housing, for example, a valve block. The secondary line can advantageously be integrated in the housing of the control system. Assembly of the control elements or choke elements at the works is simplified if the choke elements are inserted in mounting openings of the control lines in the housing of the control system such that they can be removed.
In a particularly simple method of manufacturing the control system from the production technology point of view, a conventional valve block having a number of control lines is first manufactured. Choke elements are inserted in the control lines, with the exception of at least one control line. The unthrottled control line forms the secondary line according to the invention.
Instead of a choke element, the mounting opening of the unthrottled control line can be closed by a non-throttling closure element. Alternatively, a choke element can be mounted in the unthrottled control lines of the valve block, the transmission cross-section of said choke element being larger than the transmission cross-section of the burner nozzle. From the production technology point of view, it is especially advantageous if the mounting opening in the unthrottled control line is completely dispensed with when manufacturing the valve block.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention is described in the following with reference to the appended figures. In the figures:
A gas burner 1 belonging to a gas cooking apparatus is shown highly schematically in
The control system 5 has three control lines 7, 9, 11 switched in parallel and a secondary line 13 switched in parallel thereto. Both the control lines 7, 9, 11 and the secondary line 13 branch off from the gas main 3 and then combine again to form a burner intake pipe 15. Said intake pipe opens into a burner nozzle 14. An electrically actuated magnetic control valve is arranged in each of these lines 7, 9, 11, 13. The magnetic control valves 17 can be switched from a closed position into an open position and can be controlled by means of an electronic control device 21 via signal leads 19. A user can adjust heat output stages of the gas burner 1 via the control device 21. As is described subsequently with reference to
The control device 21 can control the magnetic control valves 17 independently of one another. The magnetic valves 17 arranged in the control lines 7, 9, 11 are followed by choke elements 23, 25, 27. The diameter d1 of each choke element 23, 25, 27 indicated in
Unlike the control lines 7, 9, 11, the secondary line 13 is unthrottled. As a result, the flow resistance in the unthrottled secondary line 13 is reduced as far as possible. Compared to the control lines 7, 9, 11, the pressure loss by the open secondary line 13 is negligible. When the secondary line 13 is open, the maximum gas throughput Q8 is thus passed through the secondary line 13 without greater loss of pressure. In order to reduce the flow resistance, the transmission cross-section in the secondary line 13 is made substantially larger than the transmission cross-section of the burner nozzle 14.
The transmission cross-sections of the choke elements 23, 25, 27 are designed at the works. In the present case, when the control lines 7, 9, 11 are open, about 65% of the maximum gas throughput is supplied to the burner nozzle 14. In this case, the first choke element 23 transmits about 20%, the second choke element 25 transmits about 24% and the third choke element 27 transmits about 30% of the maximum gas throughput. By combining the open and closed positions of the magnetic valves 17 in the three control lines, eight (i.e., 23) heat output stages with the different part gas throughputs 0 and Q1 to Q7 are obtained by means of the three control lines 7, 9, 11. The heat output stages can be adjusted by means of the electronic control device 21. The part gas throughputs Q1 to Q7 are obtained from the flow characteristic of the control system 5 shown in
According to the flow characteristic in
The design configuration of the control system 5 is explained in the following
In detail each of the control lines 7, 9, 11 has a valve channel 45. The valve channel 45 runs perpendicular to the horizontal blind holes 41, 43. One end of the valve channel 45 opens into a circular recess 51 which is worked into the valve block 33. The circular recess 51 forms a valve seat for a valve disk 53 of the magnetic valve head 39, as indicated by the dashed lines in
In the closed position of the magnetic valves 17 the valve disk 53 of the magnetic valve heads 39 lies on the recessed valve seat 51. The valve channel 45 of the corresponding control line is thereby closed whereby the control line as such is closed. In the open position of the magnetic valve 17 the valve disk 55 is not in contact with the valve seat 51. In this case, the corresponding control line is open.
Opposite to the recessed valve seat 51 each of the valve channels 45 opens into a mounting opening 59. The choke elements 23, 25, 27 can be mounted in the mounting opening 59, as is indicated in
The configuration of the secondary line 13 in the valve block 33 is explained with reference to
Instead of an insert nozzle, a closure element 61 is inserted in the mounting opening 59 of the secondary line 13 according to
With the present control system it is also possible to achieve small continuous heat outputs at the gas burner 1 by cyclically switching on and off the magnetic valves 17 of the control lines 7, 9, 11. It is advantageous that re-ignition can take place reliably at any pre-set heat output with the control system 5.
Gas throughput (%)
Heat output stages
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03360005 | Jan 2003 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/000171 | 1/13/2004 | WO | 00 | 6/22/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/063629 | 7/29/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4134719 | Velie | Jan 1979 | A |
5938425 | Damrath et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6263868 | Koch et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6322354 | Carbone et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
20020086254 | Chen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 25 789 | Feb 1993 | DE |
0 949 455 | Oct 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060016444 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |