The present invention generally relates to gas operating systems for firearms and, more particularly, to the regulation of gas operating systems for firearms.
Semi-automatic firearms, such as rifles and shotguns, are designed to fire a round of ammunition, such as a cartridge or shotshell, in response to each squeeze of the trigger of the firearm, and thereafter automatically load the next shell or cartridge from the firearm magazine into the chamber of the firearm. During firing, the primer of the round of ammunition ignites the propellant (powder) inside the round, producing an expanding column of high pressure gases within the chamber and barrel of the firearm. The force of this expanding gas propels the bullet/shot of the cartridge or shell down the barrel.
In semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, and in particular in gas operated firearms, a portion of the expanding gases from firing typically are directed through a duct or port that interconnects the barrel of the firearm to a piston assembly that generally houses an axially moveable piston, which interacts with the bolt assembly of the firearm to cause cycling of the bolt assembly.
During a firing operation, a portion of the expanding combustion gases from the barrel is directed into the gas block of the gas operating system, the gas flow contacting and driving the gas piston rearwardly. This rearward action of the gas piston, which in turn is translated to the bolt, functions to cause a spent cartridge/shell casing to be automatically cleared or ejected from the chamber, a new round to be loaded into the chamber, and the hammer to be recocked for a next firing cycle. The gases directed into the gas block generally result from combustion of the primer and propellant powder of the round upon firing of the round.
Known gas actuating piston assemblies for semi-automatic firearms can suffer from numerous disadvantages, including the inability to regulate the gas energy being transmitted to the piston. For example, when lower power cartridges or shells are used, the pressure of the discharge gases sometimes is not sufficient to properly or fully actuate/drive the piston assembly, which can result in failure to fully cycle the action or jammed shells or cartridges.
In one embodiment of the invention, a gas cutoff system is provided for use with a gas-operated firearm including a barrel and receiver. The gas cutoff system includes a gas block affixed to the barrel and including a plurality of openings adjacent the barrel for receiving gas redirected from the barrel of the firearm upon firing. At least one gas cylinder is disposed within the gas block and includes a piston disposed within and moveable along the gas cylinder. A valve assembly is disposed within the gas block adjacent to the at least one gas cylinder. The valve assembly includes a selectively closable valve that regulates an energy input to the gas operating system.
In one embodiment, the gas block can include a gas plug that is securely threaded into one end of the gas block. A spring can be slideably mounted on an outer surface of the gas plug in a cutout section of the gas block engaging a forward end of the valve assembly. The valve can be actuated upon firing of the firearm when the volume/pressure of gas entering the gas block through the plurality of openings exceeds a level sufficient to overcome a biasing force of the spring so as to actuate movement of the valve within the gas cylinder. As a result, a portion of the valve is moved to a location blocking the opening(s) through which the gas is entering the gas block from the barrel to prevent too much excess gas entering the gas operating system.
In one embodiment, the gas block can be brazed to the outside of the barrel. In another embodiment, there can be two gas cylinders disposed in the gas block with each gas cylinder symmetrically positioned on an opposite side of the barrel and each including a selectively closable valve. Furthermore, the pistons disposed within each gas cylinder generally will extend through one end of the gas block and into the receiver of the firearm. In one embodiment, the spring can be mounted over the gas plug such that the spring is in contact with the gas block at a first end and presses against a rim of the valve at a second end of the spring. In addition, the valve contains an orifice or opening the size of which is tuned to allow the optimal amount of gas to flow into the gas cylinder. The body of the valve is cylindrical with the outer diameter of the valve body being designed to create a sliding seal in the gas cylinder, and the inner diameter being designed such that the resulting annular surface at the rear end of the valve which is exposed to the pressure of the gas in the gas cylinder determines the pressure level inside the gas cylinder at which sufficient force is exerted by the valve on the spring to overcome the biasing force of the spring and allow the valve to actuate.
These and other advantages and aspects of the embodiments of the disclosure will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following detailed description of the embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, as follows.
The following description is provided as an enabling teaching of embodiments of the invention including the best, currently known embodiment. Those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that many changes can be made to the embodiments described, while still obtaining the beneficial results. It will also be apparent that some of the desired benefits of the embodiments described can be obtained by selecting some of the features of the embodiments without utilizing other features. Accordingly, those who work in the art will recognize that many modifications and adaptations to the embodiments described are possible and may even be desirable in certain circumstances. Thus, the following description is provided as illustrative of the principles of the invention and not in limitation thereof, since the scope of the invention is defined by the claims.
Generally, a gas operating system includes a gas piston and a gas plug adapted to be received within and housed by the gas block. The gas block further includes a first, proximal or front end, a second, rear or distal end, and a gas block bore extending longitudinally therethrough. The gas block is attached to the barrel in a location such that the barrel orifice generally aligns with a gas port or inlet for the gas block bore, which extends through the gas block between the barrel orifice and the gas block bore. The aligned barrel orifice and gas port enable a portion or flow of combustion gases to communicate from the bore of the barrel into the gas block bore.
Generally, the gas piston slides along the gas block bore (cylinder) of the gas block housing after firing, the gas piston being slideable within the gas block bore and along the gas block for a desired amount of travel. The gas piston extends beyond the rearward end of the gas block bore and through the clearance bore of the bushing of the barrel extension for engaging the bolt assembly in the receiver. The gas piston can be biased to a position where a reduced diameter portion of the gas piston, or other portion capable of receiving the gases, is generally aligned with the gas port so as to enable a passage of gases from the barrel into the gas block bore.
With reference to
The disclosed embodiments effectively control the energy input to the operating system of the firearm. This in turn allows for a more reliable operating system and reduces the opportunity to overstress and fail components in the action of the firearm.
Typically, a gas system will allow as much gas as can physically flow through the orifices to enter the system. Excess gas is bled off usually with a spring-loaded valve. In an exemplary embodiment, the gas system actually meters, or cuts off, or stops the flow of gas into the gas system to deal with excess gas. Rather than allowing free flow of gases into the gas block 10 and bleeding off the excess gas, the disclosed embodiments stop the flow of gas to prevent the gas system from getting too much energy.
In one exemplary embodiment, a gas operating system is provided for a firearm, such as a shotgun.
The gas block 10 including two cylinder bores is attached to the barrel 12. A piston 24 is then inserted into each cylinder bore. The valve which has an exterior rim 22 exceeding the diameter of the cylinder bore is inserted into the cylinder bore until the valve rim 22 physically contacts an outer edge of the gas block 10.
As further illustrated in
In one embodiment, the valve 20 inside the gas cylinder 26 of gas block 10 includes a rim 22 that is positioned on the outside edge of the gas cylinder 26 when the valve 20 is inserted adjacent to the piston 24 in the gas cylinder 26. The gas cutoff system can include a gas cylinder 26 on each side of the gas block 10. When the gas block 10 is brazed to the barrel 12, each gas cylinder in the gas block is positioned on an opposite side of the barrel. Gas from the barrel 12 exiting the barrel orifice enters the gas cylinder 26 through an orifice in the valve 20 that is located adjacent to the piston 24 in the gas cylinder 26. Once gas flows into the gas block 10 through the valve orifice, it acts on the valve 20 and causes the valve 20 to move forward in the same direction that a projectile would exit the muzzle of the barrel 12. In moving in a forward direction, the valve 20 compresses the spring 18 and the orifice in the valve 20 basically is blocked off, so that no additional gas can flow through the valve 20 into the piston/cylinder area.
The spring forces acting on spring 18 can be tuned for the gas cutoff system for a particular firearm, along with orifice sizes and other parameters. Following compression of the spring 18, the spring force acts on the valve 20 to return the valve 20 to its original position for the next shot to be fired. In one embodiment, the valve 20 could move forward about an eighth of an inch, just enough to cover the orifice in the valve 20. In one embodiment, the hole cut in the gas block 10 is larger than the hole in the barrel 12. A smaller hole is drilled in the valve 20 and is positioned adjacent to the larger hole in the gas block 10. As the valve 20 moves, it is no longer adjacent the hole in the gas block 10, thus cutting off the flow of gas into the gas block 10.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, each gas cylinder 26 of the gas block 10 operates independently of the other. However, both should function in the same manner since each gas cylinder 26 has the same amount of energy with each gas cylinder 26 having the same orifices drilled into them. Each gas cylinder 26 has its own valve 20 and piston 24 and operates against a spring 18 in the gas block 10 on each side of the barrel 12. The gas cylinders 26 are not physically connected to each other and could be located at varying positions in the gas block depending on performance requirements. In exemplary embodiments, the components of the gas cutoff system could be made from hardened steel with ceramic-type coatings on the surface for wear resistance.
The orifice 34 in valve 20 contains an opening the size of which is tuned to allow the optimal amount of gas to flow into the gas cylinder 26. The body of the valve 20 is cylindrical with an outer diameter of the valve body sufficient to create a sliding seal in the gas cylinder 26, and with an inner diameter such that the resulting annular surface at the rear end of the valve 20, which is exposed to the pressure of the gas in the gas cylinder 26, determines the pressure level inside the gas cylinder 26 at which sufficient force is exerted by the valve 20 on the spring 18 to overcome the biasing force of the spring 18 and allow the valve 20 to actuate.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means plus function elements in any claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or acts for performing the function in combination with other claim elements as specifically claimed.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many modifications to the exemplary embodiments are possible without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, it is possible to use some of the features of the embodiments disclosed without the corresponding use of the other features. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments is provided for the purpose of illustrating the principles of the invention, and not in limitation thereof, since the scope of the invention is defined solely by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/848,171, filed on Dec. 26, 2012. The specification and drawings of the provisional patent application are specifically incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2715858 | Hoppert | Aug 1955 | A |
2777366 | Cook | Jan 1957 | A |
2895383 | Reed | Jul 1959 | A |
3020807 | Hailston et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3127812 | Into et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
3568564 | Badali | Mar 1971 | A |
3968727 | Hyytinen | Jul 1976 | A |
3990348 | Vesamaa | Nov 1976 | A |
4085654 | Panigoni | Apr 1978 | A |
4102242 | Liedke | Jul 1978 | A |
4102243 | Jennie | Jul 1978 | A |
4125054 | Jennie | Nov 1978 | A |
4174654 | Liedke | Nov 1979 | A |
4373423 | Moore | Feb 1983 | A |
4389920 | Dufour, Sr. | Jun 1983 | A |
4414880 | Throner | Nov 1983 | A |
4702146 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4872392 | Powers et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4901623 | Lee | Feb 1990 | A |
5218163 | Dabrowski | Jun 1993 | A |
5272956 | Hudson | Dec 1993 | A |
5388500 | Petrovich | Feb 1995 | A |
5959234 | Scaramucci et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6374720 | Tedde | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6508160 | Beretta | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6715396 | Dionne | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6971202 | Bender | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6973863 | Jones | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7258056 | Guesnet et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7810423 | Monroe | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7832326 | Barrett | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7856917 | Noveske | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7891284 | Barrett | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7926404 | Brittingham | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942090 | Hoffman | May 2011 | B1 |
7946214 | Stone | May 2011 | B2 |
8042448 | Sylvester et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8065949 | Molinari | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8161864 | Vuksanovich | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8201489 | Juarez | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8245625 | Winge | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250964 | Stone | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261653 | Crommett | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8316756 | Woodell et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8393259 | Larue | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20050115398 | Olson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060278205 | Axelsson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090229454 | Fluhr et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100071541 | Barrett | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100275770 | Noveske | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110107900 | Presz, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120167749 | Young | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120167756 | Larue | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120167757 | Gomez | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
665712 | May 1988 | CH |
0158707 | Oct 1985 | EP |
747371 | Apr 1956 | GB |
WO 2010-123604 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 25, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/076999 filed Dec. 20, 2013. |
Written Opinion dated Apr. 25, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/076999 filed Dec. 20, 2013. |
Jacob Gottfredson, Standing ready: Sig Sauers 516 patrol rifle, Guns Magazine, Mar. 1, 2012, pp. 68-70, vol. 58, issue 3, Publishers Development Corporation. |
Michael O. Humphries, SIG Sauer SIG556 Classic, Aug. 23, 2012, 2 pages, National Rifle Association, http:.//www.americanrifleman.org/ArticlePage.aspx?id=1661&cid=4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140174285 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61848171 | Dec 2012 | US |