BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a front view illustrating an example of an embodiment according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken along the V-V line in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a sectional view taken along the W-W line in FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a sectional view illustrating a crystalline magnesium layer formed on a thin-film magnesium layer in the embodiment example.
FIG. 5 is a sectional view illustrating a thin-film magnesium layer formed on a crystalline magnesium layer in the embodiment example.
FIG. 6 is a SEM photograph of the magnesium oxide single-crystal having a cubic single-crystal structure.
FIG. 7 is a SEM photograph of the magnesium oxide single-crystal having a cubic polycrystal structure.
FIG. 8 is a graph showing the relationship between the particle size of a magnesium oxide single-crystal and the wavelengths of a CL emission in the embodiment example.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the relationship between the particle size of a magnesium oxide single-crystal and the intensities of a CL emission at 235 nm in the embodiment example.
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the state of the wavelength of a CL emission from a magnesium oxide layer formed by vapor deposition.
FIG. 11 is a graph showing the relationship between the discharge delay and the peak intensities of a CL emission at 235 nm from the magnesium oxide single-crystal.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing a comparison of the discharge delay characteristics between the case when the protective layer is constituted only of the magnesium oxide layer formed by vapor deposition and that when the protective layer has a double layer structure made up of a crystalline magnesium layer and a thin-film magnesium layer formed by vapor deposition.
FIG. 13 is a graph showing a comparison of luminance residual image evaluations.
FIG. 14 is a graph showing a comparison of the voltage drift between the PDP according to the embodiment of the present invention and a conventional PDP.
FIG. 15 is a table showing a comparison of the voltage drift.
FIG. 16 is a graph showing a comparison of the luminance drift between the PDP according to the embodiment of the present invention and a conventional PDP.
FIG. 17 is a table showing a comparison of the luminance drift.
FIG. 18 is a graph showing a comparison of the voltage residual image between the PDP according to the embodiment of the present invention and a conventional PDP.
FIG. 19 is a table showing a comparison of the voltage residual image.
FIG. 20 is a graph showing a comparison of the total amount of gas generated from phosphor.
FIG. 21 is a graph showing a comparison of the partial pressures of gases generated from phosphor.