The present application relates to devices for injecting lift gas into a production conduit of an oil well via one or more gas lift flow control devices and to a gas lift flow control device for use in the method.
Lift gas can be pumped into an annulus between a production tubing and surrounding well casing and subsequently into the production tubing from the annulus via one or more one way gas lift flow control devices in side pockets that are distributed along the length of the production tubing. The lift gas which is injected through the flow control devices into the crude oil (or other fluid) stream in the production conduit reduces the density of the fluid column in the production conduit and enhances the crude oil production rate of the well.
Gas lift flow control devices can use one way check valves which comprise a flapper type valve that presses against a seating. They can also include a ball or hemisphere or cone which is pressed against a valve seating ring by a spring. If the lift gas pressure is higher than the pressure of the crude oil stream in the production conduit then this pressure difference exceeds the forces exerted to the check valve by the spring so that the spring is compressed and the valve is opened and lift gas is permitted to flow from the gas filled injection conduit into the production conduit. If however the pressure of the crude oil stream is higher than the lift gas pressure in the injection conduit, the accumulated forces of the spring and the pressure difference across the gas lift flow control device closes the check valve and prevents crude oil, or other fluid, to flow from the production conduit into the injection conduit.
Issues exist relating to integrity of the sealing function of the one way valve, particularly across a wide range of pressure differentials, e.g., zero to high pressure differential. Also, issues exist with degradation of the seals through exposure to flow of gas and well fluids for various reasons, e.g., debris in the flow.
Accordingly, it is desirable to improve the sealing of the one way valve, and also to protect the integrity of the sealing components during flow of the gas and operation in general.
A preferred embodiment includes a gas lift valve that has a longitudinally extending tubular body having an inlet and an outlet, a flow path extending between the inlet and the outlet, and a flow tube located inside the body. The flow tube is translatable in the axial direction between at least a first and a second position. A venturi orifice is located inside the body along the flow path. A seal part is located proximate to the outlet of the body. A flapper is connected with the body by way of a hinge part and the flapper has at least a first open position and a second closed position. The closed position is where the flapper contacts the seal thereby closing the flowpath and the second closed position is where the flapper does not contact the seal and does not close the flowpath.
The following is a brief description of figures herein showing some preferred embodiments of various designs.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present embodiments. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present embodiments may be practiced without many of these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments are possible.
As used here, the terms “above” and “below”; “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; “upwardly” and “downwardly”; and other like terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element are used in this description to more clearly describe some embodiments. However, when applied to equipment and methods for use in wells that are deviated or horizontal, such terms may refer to a left to right, right to left, or diagonal relationship as appropriate.
A purpose of the flow tube 4 is to protect the seal part 2. According to embodiments, when in use the gas lift valve is located in a conduit connecting a well annulus with an internal production tube. The gas lift valve is located in a side pocket of the production tubing that connects the annulus with the interior of the production tubing. Gas is forced into the annulus and when a proper pressure is reached, the gas travels from the annulus, through the gas lift valve, and into the production tubing. As is apparent from
The seal part 2 can be made up of a hard metal portion 18 and at least one softer spring or elastomeric portion 19. Additionally, the seal part 2 can have a self-aligning feature. In
In
The embodiments described herein are merely examples of various preferred designs and are not meant in any way to unduly limit the scope of any presently recited or subsequently related claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2223944 | Roy | Dec 1940 | A |
2485092 | Gannon | Oct 1949 | A |
2519541 | Bryant | Aug 1950 | A |
2676782 | Bostock et al. | Apr 1954 | A |
3009476 | Usab | Nov 1961 | A |
3091254 | Kilayko | May 1963 | A |
3202178 | Wolfe | Aug 1965 | A |
3226082 | Gulick et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3269692 | Shafer | Aug 1966 | A |
3346008 | Scaramucci | Oct 1967 | A |
3356333 | Scaramucci | Dec 1967 | A |
3375874 | Cherry et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3446475 | Scaramucci | May 1969 | A |
3489170 | Leman | Jan 1970 | A |
4076212 | Leman | Feb 1978 | A |
4248308 | Pringle | Feb 1981 | A |
4293116 | Hinrichs | Oct 1981 | A |
4356867 | Carmody | Nov 1982 | A |
4377273 | Beson | Mar 1983 | A |
4444266 | Pringle | Apr 1984 | A |
4474208 | Looney | Oct 1984 | A |
4583596 | Davis | Apr 1986 | A |
4586534 | McNeely | May 1986 | A |
4618154 | Freudenthal | Oct 1986 | A |
4674575 | Guess | Jun 1987 | A |
4703805 | Morris | Nov 1987 | A |
4781213 | Kilayko | Nov 1988 | A |
4815770 | Hyne et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834183 | Vinzant et al. | May 1989 | A |
4862965 | Pringle | Sep 1989 | A |
4911408 | Kemp | Mar 1990 | A |
4926945 | Pringle et al. | May 1990 | A |
5004007 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5125457 | Meaders | Jun 1992 | A |
5201371 | Allen | Apr 1993 | A |
5249600 | Blume | Oct 1993 | A |
5257663 | Pringle et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263847 | Akkerman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5323859 | Smith et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5503229 | Hill et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522418 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5752569 | Bhavsar et al. | May 1998 | A |
5884705 | Hill, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5918858 | Rawson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5996687 | Pringle et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6079497 | Johnston et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6209663 | Hosie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6296061 | Leismer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6394187 | Dickson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425413 | Davis et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6651693 | Simmons et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6698719 | Geiser | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6854519 | Deaton et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7152688 | Richards | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7360600 | MacDougall et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360602 | Kritzler et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7464763 | Galloway et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7600534 | Deaton | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7841416 | Henschel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7967076 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20030024571 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040154803 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060169465 | Hejl et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070137869 | MacDougall et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070181312 | Kritzler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080047713 | Henschel et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080121397 | Galloway et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080142752 | Matzner | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090044947 | White et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110088908 | Xu | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005225752 | Oct 2005 | AU |
1727962 | Jan 2008 | EP |
9953170 | Oct 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110155391 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |