This application claims priority to European Patent application 14198418.7 filed Dec. 17, 2014, the contents of which are hereby incorporated in its entirety.
The present relates to moisture and/or mist separators for separating a liquid, such as water droplets from a gas, such as steam.
A moisture separator, also known as droplets separator, is a device for separating water droplets from steam. Moisture separators are widely used in the power industry as well as oil and gas industry to remove liquid droplets from a gas or steam. In general mist removal is necessary for several reasons, as explained below.
One reason is to increase the cycle efficiency of a power plant. Usually, in thermal power plants, the steam generated from a boiler is expanded several times in so called high, middle and low pressure turbines. In a Nuclear Power Plant, during the first expansion in the high pressure turbine nucleation phenomena occurs in the high pressure turbine resulting in the exhaust of humid steam. For reasons of efficiency, before re-heating the humid steam, it may be advantageous to mechanical separate water from the saturated steam so that the working fluid sent to re-heater bundles is humid steam with low moisture content. Since the latent heat of evaporation of water is significantly high, it is preferred to eliminate the water content in the humid steam and send the collected water back in the thermodynamic cycle instead of using a lot of energy for the moisture evaporation thereby limiting thermal loads on the bundles, as well, caused by the evaporation processes.
Another benefit achieved by removing the moisture content is the protection of downstream equipment from erosion damages. One type of moisture separators widely used in the oil and gas industries as well as power generation industry is a so-called wave-plate mist eliminators. This type of separator uses the principle of inertia, whereby larger water droplets tend to continue in a straight line when the direction of flow of an air/steam stream carrying the water droplets is changed. These wave-plate mist eliminators comprise a plurality of narrowly spaced wave-shaped or corrugated metal sheets, oriented in line with the air/steam flow path. The two-phase flow (mixture of steam and water droplets) is forced to travel through the tortuous channels and to change repeatedly flow direction. The water droplets, that due to their inertia are not able to follow these changes in direction, deviate from the main flow and impact on the channel walls, where they adhere and coalesce. When the amount of liquid is sufficiently high a film and liquid rivulets are formed, which are continuously drained out from the wave-plate mist eliminator by gravity. The inertia of the drops and the drag of the steam control the motion of the drops through the channels.
During the design process of these kinds of separators it is typically advantageous to find a configuration which minimizes, as much as possible, pressure loss as this has a direct effect on the energy efficiency of the power plant as a whole. Moreover, by increasing the separation efficiency of a single separator channel, the whole separator panel can be reduced in size and consequently, if a moisture separator reheater is used, the moisture separator reheater can be made a smaller and cheaper. There is therefore a continuous need to seek new ways to overcome these problems.
A gas liquid separator is disclosed that can provide improved water separation performance and low pressure loss.
It attempts to address this problem by means of the subject matter of the independent claim. Advantageous embodiments are given in the dependent claims.
The disclosure is based on the general idea of providing a corrugated plate gas liquid separator designed in order to delay the separation point of the main gas flow from the walls through the separator after each corrugation peak.
One general aspect includes a gas liquid separator, for separating liquid droplets from a gas flowing generally in a main gas flow direction through the gasliquid separator. The gasliquid separator comprising a plurality of plates that are mutually parallel and spaced apart to form a flow channel. Each of the plurality of plates has a plurality of corrugations wherein at least one of the corrugations has a extrados wing profile shaped camber.
Further aspects may include one or more of the following features. Corrugations comprising a series of extrados wing profile shaped camber. The gas liquid separator configured such that in the main gas flow direction the plurality of plates are free of straight sections. At least one of the corrugations includes an extrados surface derived from a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) airfoil configuration. The plurality of plates including grooves orthogonal to the main gas flow direction, configured as drainage grooves. The grooves have, as well, the effect of increasing the energy of the turbulent boundary layer developing at the wall, thus helping the flow to remain attached at the wall and consequently delaying further the flow separation point.
The gas liquid separator may be configured as a steam water separator.
Other aspects and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings which by way of example illustrate exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
By way of example, an embodiment of the present disclosure is described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are now described with references to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details, and is not limited to the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein.
In an exemplary embodiment shown in
The corrugated plates 12 each have a plurality of corrugations wherein the curvature of the corrugations define an intrados surface 22 and an extrados surface 24 wherein the intrados surface 22 is defined as the internal curvature of the corrugation corresponding to a concave area of the plate 12, while the extrados surface 24 is defined as the external curvature of the corrugation corresponding to a convex area of the plate 12.
In an exemplary embodiment shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, at least one of the corrugations 20 has an extrados wing profile shaped camber. As shown in
An effect of the extrados wing profile shaped camber of corrugations is that the shape can trigger separation of the main flow at a separation point 17 further along the plate 12 than would otherwise occur if the corrugations 20 comprised fixed radius curved joined by straight portions or else comprise sinusoidal curves. This can have the consequence that if any re-entrainment occurs at the separation point 17, the injected droplets will be directed towards the steam stagnation zones, where the gravitational forces are stronger than the shear forces exerted by the separated flow to the water film deposited on the surfaces of the plates 12 thus assisting in drainage of liquid further enhanced, in an exemplary embodiment, by drainage grooves 26. In addition, the delayed separation point 17 can reduced pressure losses resulting in a reduction of the overall energy to flow a gas liquid mixture through the separator 10.
The separation point 17 can be further delayed based on the known principle that a turbulent boundary layer is less likely to separate than a laminar one by using grooves 26 which increase the turbulence of the boundary layer. As a consequents of the grooves 26, the pressure loss of the flow channel 14 can be minimized compared to the same kind of plates 12 without grooves 26. The more the flow remains attached to the surface of a plate 12, the smaller the stagnation zone and consequently the lower the losses.
Although the disclosure has been herein shown and described in what is conceived to be the most practical exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure can be embodied in other specific forms. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restricted. The scope of the disclosure is indicated by the appended claims rather that the foregoing description and all changes that come within the meaning and range and equivalences thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14198418 | Dec 2014 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3338035 | Dinkelacker | Aug 1967 | A |
3358580 | Freese | Dec 1967 | A |
3751886 | Sokolowski | Aug 1973 | A |
3870488 | Arndt | Mar 1975 | A |
3912471 | Cotton, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
3953183 | Regehr | Apr 1976 | A |
4072478 | Regehr | Feb 1978 | A |
4198215 | Regehr | Apr 1980 | A |
D272181 | Sixsmith | Jan 1984 | S |
4430101 | Sixsmith | Feb 1984 | A |
4508552 | Ovard | Apr 1985 | A |
4530707 | Ovard | Jul 1985 | A |
4557740 | Smith | Dec 1985 | A |
4581051 | Regehr | Apr 1986 | A |
4601731 | Michelson | Jul 1986 | A |
4802901 | Wurz | Feb 1989 | A |
5104431 | Fewel, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5268011 | Wurz | Dec 1993 | A |
5269823 | Wurz | Dec 1993 | A |
5839244 | Johnson | Nov 1998 | A |
5972062 | Zimmermann | Oct 1999 | A |
6149515 | Van Becelaere | Nov 2000 | A |
20070137154 | Agnello | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20100326026 | Bratton | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20150135661 | MacDonald | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 14 094 | Sep 1993 | DE |
0 178 515 | Apr 1986 | EP |
1 361 634 | May 1964 | FR |
2489511 | Oct 2012 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Wu et al.,Aerodynamic Effects on Primary and Secondary Spray Breakup,Liquid rocket Engine Combustion Instability Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics,pp. 247-279,1995. |
Austrheim et al.,Re-entrainment correlations for demisting cyclones acting at elevated pressures on range of fluids, Dept. of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Alegt. 55, 5007 Bergen Norway, 2007. |
Fuglede et al.,MAE 440—Aerodynamics Laboratory. Experimental Comparison of Drag of a Golf Ball with Smooth Ball, Califomia State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, May 20, 2007. |
Scott, “Golf Ball Dimples & Drag”, Feb. 13, 2005, retrieved from “http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/aerodynamics/q0215.shtml” on Nov. 2, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160175750 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |