This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of German Patent Application DE 10 2012 007 139.6 filed Apr. 10, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention pertains to a gas mask, with a mask body, which is designed to cover the face of a user, and with an opening in the mask body, which is closed gas-tightly by a speech diaphragm.
Gas masks are used as personal protection gear to protect the user from inhalable toxic substances and toxic environmental substances. The field of use lies in occupational safety and especially in firefighting. Half masks or full masks are used for this, which supply the user with filtered ambient air or clean air from compressed air cylinders.
The masks protect the user especially well against environmental effects by sealing the face, especially the mouth and nose, against the environment with the mask body. This means, however, on the other hand, that speech is transmitted from the sealed mask to the outside space only poorly, because the materials greatly muffle speech. Verbal communication between gas mask users is therefore problematic.
Speech diaphragms, which are said to improve transmission of the user's speech through the mask to the outside, are frequently integrated in prior-art gas masks. The speech diaphragm consists of a thin plastic film or metal foil, which is fastened gas-tightly in an opening of the mask body. The speech diaphragm is stimulated by the sound in the interior of the mask and vibrates correspondingly, as a result of which it transmits corresponding sound waves itself to the outside. While the prior-art solutions are well suited for low-frequency sound components, the transmission of frequencies above 1 kHz is limited. The transmission function of the speech diaphragm is consequently frequency-dependent and decreases with rising frequency. This leads to distortions and compromises the intelligibility of speech, because the components with high frequencies are especially important for the intelligibility of speech.
An oxygen inhalation mask is known from DE 699 19 907 T2. A horn or a funnel is arranged in front of the user's mouth in the interior space of this mask. A microphone capsule is arranged in the smaller opening of the funnel pointing towards the user's mouth. The funnel is said to bring about focusing of the sound waves towards the microphone capsule.
The object of the present invention is to design a gas mask with speech diaphragm such that the intelligibility of the speech transmitted through the speech diaphragm is improved.
According to the invention, a gas mask is provided comprising a mask body which is designed to cover the face of a user. The mask body has an opening. A speech diaphragm is provided closing the opening in the mask body in a gas-tight manner. A funnel is directed towards the speech diaphragm with an opening angle in the range between 20° and 90°. The funnel is arranged in front of the speech diaphragm in an interior space of the mask body in order to focus sound waves onto the speech diaphragm.
A funnel (funnel part) is arranged according to the present invention in the interior of the mask hood such that the speech diaphragm is located in the opening of the funnel pointing towards the outside. The funnel opening angle is advantageously in the range of 20° to 90°. It was surprisingly found that such a funnel-shaped design considerably improves the intelligibility of speech, because especially sound waves of a higher frequency are transmitted to the speech diaphragm and are emitted by same better. Smaller opening angles do not generate sufficient amplification of the signal, because only a segment of the sound field extending in parallel is transmitted without convergence of outer parts. Larger opening angles likewise fail to have an amplifying effect any longer, because mainly reflection of the sound waves will now occur and thus these are not sent to the transmitting diaphragm at all. The opening angle of the funnel is defined as an opening angle of two diametrically opposed tangents to the inner wall of the funnel, namely a tangent to the inner wall at one side and a tangent to the inner wall at an opposite side. In exemplary embodiments in which the slopes of the tangents to the inner walls are no longer constant in the axial direction, but the funnel widens increasingly rapidly in the axial direction, the opening angle is defined as the opening angle of the mean tangent slopes of two diametrically opposed straight lines at the inner walls of the funnel.
The opening angle of the funnel is optimized for the amplification function of higher frequency ranges, especially between 800 Hz and 4.5 kHz and is between 20° and 90° and preferably between 30° and 50°.
The size of the funnel opening facing the speech diaphragm is preferably equal to the size of the speech diaphragm, i.e., the speech diaphragm fully covers the opening of the funnel without extending beyond the contour of the opening.
In a preferred embodiment, the funnel is connected at its opening facing the speech diaphragm to a frame, in which the speech diaphragm is held in a tensioned state. The frame may be made integrally in one piece with the funnel.
A protective grid is preferably arranged in front of the speech diaphragm in the funnel opening facing the speech diaphragm. The protective grid may have, for example, a plurality of ring elements, which are located concentrically in the opening facing the speech diaphragm and are held by a plurality of web elements extending radially in the opening facing the speech diaphragm. As an alternative, the protective grid may be formed by a plurality of web elements, which divide the speech diaphragm opening of the funnel into a plurality of honeycombed openings. The protective grid preferably has a regular grid with honeycombed openings of equal size, which is in the range of 10 mm2 to 100 mm2.
The material of the funnel is preferably soft enough, on the one hand, to guarantee sufficient wearing comfort for the user, and is, on the other hand, sufficiently reverberant to bring about the weakest possible dissipative, i.e., sound-muffling wall effects. The funnel is made for this purpose of a plastic material with a Shore A hardness of 30 to 80 in a preferred embodiment. The hardness of the plastic material is preferably in the range of Shore A 45 to 65.
The funnel does not have to be truncated cone-shaped, and the slope of the funnel wall may rather vary in the axial direction of the funnel, i.e., the slope of a tangent to the funnel wall may decrease in the axial direction from the end of the funnel facing away from the speech diaphragm to the end of the funnel facing the speech diaphragm. In addition, the funnel also does not have to be exactly rotationally symmetrical in relation to its longitudinal axis. The opening angle of such a funnel would then be determined in both of the above-mentioned cases as the mean opening angle.
The present invention will be explained below on the basis of exemplary embodiments shown in the drawings. The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages and specific objects attained by its uses, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated.
Referring to the drawings in particular, the design of the speech diaphragm unit will be described below with reference to
The threaded ring 6 is joined in the interior of the mask by a funnel 4. In the embodiment shown, funnel 4 is not rotationally symmetrical, but the height is reduced in the axial direction in two opposite areas 5, as a result of which a free space is created for the mouth and nose of the user.
The funnel 4 or funnel part 4 has a funnel opening end defining an funnel opening. The funnel part 4 has a wall extending from the funnel opening end and to a funnel interior end. A spacing between the interior surface of the wall at opposite sides widens in the direction away from the funnel opening and towards an interior end and towards the interior of the mask. This widening, opening angle or wall angle is in a range between 20° and 90° (see
The widening, opening angle or wall angle of funnel 4 is defined as an angle between diametrically opposite tangents to the inner wall of the funnel. This opening angle is in the range of 20° to 90° and preferably in the range of 30° to 50°. In the situation of embodiments in which the slopes of the tangents to the inner walls are no longer constant in the axial direction, but the funnel widens increasingly rapidly in the axial direction, the opening angle is defined as the opening angle of the mean tangent slopes of two diametrically opposed straight lines at the inner walls of the funnel.
The funnel 4 preferably consists of a plastic material with a Shore A hardness of 30 to 80 and preferably Shore A 45 to 65.
The protective grid 2 preferably defines, in a regular pattern, honeycombed openings, which are preferably in a size range of 10 mm2 to 100 mm2. The protective grid 2 is formed by a plurality of web elements, which divide the funnel opening facing the speech diaphragm into the plurality of honeycombed openings. The protective grid 2 may have a plurality of ring elements, which are located concentrically in the opening facing the speech diaphragm and which are held by a plurality of radially extending web elements in the funnel opening facing the speech diaphragm.
In a preferred embodiment, the funnel is connected at its opening facing the speech diaphragm to a frame, in which the speech diaphragm is held in a tensioned state. The frame may be made integrally in one piece with the funnel 4.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been shown and described in detail to illustrate the application of the principles of the invention, it will be understood that the invention may be embodied otherwise without departing from such principles.
1 Gas mask
2 Protective grid
4 Funnel
5 Funnel areas with reduced wall height
6 Threaded ring
8 Speech diaphragm
10 Threaded ring
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 007 139 | Apr 2012 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1762695 | Monro | Jun 1930 | A |
2077313 | Dym | Apr 1937 | A |
2705052 | Workinger | Mar 1955 | A |
2745911 | Webb | May 1956 | A |
2857013 | Orso | Oct 1958 | A |
4901356 | Bauer | Feb 1990 | A |
D427986 | Webb | Jul 2000 | S |
6365084 | Terajima | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6997178 | Reynaud | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7349551 | Skillicorn et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20090107504 | McAuley | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110159758 | Martin | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
699 19 907 | Sep 2005 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130263848 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |