1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to gas spargers and container systems that incorporate a gas sparger.
2. The Relevant Technology
Spargers are commonly used in bioreactors for delivering controlled volumes of gas to a growth media containing cells. In part, the gas is used to control the partial pressure of oxygen within the growth media and to control the pH and other perimeters of the growth media so that the conditions are optimal for cell growth. Spargers typically comprise a hollow metal ring having a hose coupled thereto. The ring is formed from a sintered metal so that the ring is porous. The ring is manually positioned at the bottom of a container with the hose extending up through a port at the top of the container. During operation, pressurized gas is delivered to the ring through the hose. The gas then permeates out through the metal ring so as to enter the media in the form of small bubbles. As the bubbles travel up through the media, at least a portion of the gas becomes entrained within the media. Other conventional spargers comprise a section of stainless steel tubing that is bent into a ring with small diameter holes positioned along the curved length thereof.
Although conventional spargers are useful in delivering gas to the media, they have a number of shortcomings. For example, conventional spargers are relatively expensive to make and are thus designed to be reused. Reuse of a conventional sparger, however, requires that it be removed from the container and then cleaned and sterilized. In some situations, cleaning of the sparger can be difficult in that cell by-product, dead cells, and other particulate within the growth media can be lodged on or trapped within the sparger. Thus cleaning and sterilizing of the sparger can be both time consuming and expensive. Time and care must also be taken to properly position and seal the sparger within the container without contaminating the sparger or the container.
Furthermore, in conventional bioreactors it is necessary that the growth media containing the cells be continually mixed or suspended so that the properties of the growth media remain homogeneous. Conventional spargers can obstruct the flow of the fluid which can produce dead spots where the cells die. Furthermore, the cells can be caught on or by the sparger which can damage or kill the cells. In addition, the spargers must be carefully designed and positioned so that they do not obstruct the mixing system.
Accordingly, what is needed are spargers and container systems that do not require cleaning or sterilization, which can be used without risk of contamination of the container or sparger, and which produce minimum obstruction to the fluid flow within the container and the mixing system.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope.
The present invention relates to gas spargers and container systems that incorporate a gas sparger. In general, the gas spargers of the present invention include a flexible, gas permeable sparging sheet. During operation, a gas is delivered to the sparger which is associated with a container holding a fluid. The gas passes through the flexible, gas permeable sparging sheet of the sparger so as to enter the fluid within the container. As the gas travels or mixes within the fluid, at least a portion of gas becomes entrained within the fluid. The sparger is thus used to control the partial pressure of the gas within the fluid and/or control related properties of the fluid, such as the pH. Such spargers can be used in bioreactors where it is necessary to control the oxygen content and other properties of the growth media to facilitate proper growth of cells and microorganisms. However, the spargers can also be used in fermentation systems and in other fluid processing systems where it is needed or desirable to expose a gas to a fluid.
As a result of using a flexible, gas permeable sparging sheet as the sparging mechanism, select embodiments of the inventive spargers have a variety of unique benefits over conventional rigid metal spargers. By way of example and not by limitation, the inventive spargers are relatively inexpensive to make and can thus be disposed of after a single use. As such, there is no need for cleaning or sterilizing between uses. The spargers can be easily scaled for use in small laboratory experiments or large scale commercial production systems. The flexible, gas permeable sparging sheets can be selected and sized to disperse the gas as micro-bubbles having a desired size over a desired area. Such dispersion enables the gas to be more easily entrained into the fluid while minimizing foam production. In addition, select embodiments of the inventive spargers can be formed on or connected to the container so as to form a low profile sparger that has minimal interference with fluid flow or cell movement within the container.
The inventive spargers can be formed as part of a flexible container, such as a disposable bag or liner, or can be coupled to such flexible containers. The sparger and related container can then be simultaneously sterilized and sold as a unitary system. This approach simplifies the sterilization process and eliminates the difficulty of the end user having to manually insert and properly position the sparger within the container without compromising sterility of the container or the sparger. Alternatively, the disposable spargers of the present invention can be designed to be retrofitted into existing rigid containers. Furthermore, in some embodiments the entire sparger or substantial portions thereof can be designed to be soft and flexible so that the combined sparger and container can be folded and/or rolled into a compact shape for storage and/or transport without risk of damage to the sparger or container. Numerous other advantages of different embodiments of the present invention will be discussed below or will be apparent from the following disclosure and appended drawings.
Depicted in
As also depicted in
Body 36 is comprised of a flexible, water impermeable material such as a low-density polyethylene or other polymeric sheets having a thickness in a range between about 0.1 mm to about 5 mm with about 0.2 mm to about 2 mm being more common. Other thicknesses can also be used. The material can be comprised of a single ply material or can comprise two or more layers which are either sealed together or separated to form a double wall container. Where the layers are sealed together, the material can comprise a laminated or extruded material. The laminated material comprises two or more separately formed layers that are subsequently secured together by an adhesive.
The extruded material comprises a single integral sheet that comprises two or more layers of different materials that can be separated by a contact layer. All of the layers are simultaneously co-extruded. One example of an extruded material that can be used in the present invention is the Thermo Scientific CX3-9 film available from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The Thermo Scientific CX3-9 film is a three-layer, 9 mil cast film produced in a cGMP facility. The outer layer is a polyester elastomer coextruded with an ultra-low density polyethylene product contact layer. Another example of an extruded material that can be used in the present invention is the Thermo Scientific CX5-14 cast film also available from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The Thermo Scientific CX5-14 cast film comprises a polyester elastomer outer layer, an ultra-low density polyethylene contact layer, and an EVOH barrier layer disposed therebetween. In still another example, a multi-web film produced from three independent webs of blown film can be used. The two inner webs are each a 4 mil monolayer polyethylene film (which is referred to by Thermo Fisher Scientific as the Thermo Scientific BM1 film) while the outer barrier web is a 5.5 mil thick 6-layer coextrusion film (which is referred to by Thermo Fisher Scientific as the Thermo Scientific BX6 film).
The material is approved for direct contact with living cells and is capable of maintaining a solution sterile. In such an embodiment, the material can also be sterilizable such as by ionizing radiation. Examples of materials that can be used in different situations are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,587 which issued on Jul. 4, 2000 and United States Patent Publication No. US 2003-0077466 A1, published Apr. 24, 2003 which are hereby incorporated by specific reference.
In one embodiment, body 36 comprises a two-dimensional pillow style bag wherein two sheets of material are placed in overlapping relation and the two sheets are bounded together at their peripheries to form internal chamber 40. Alternatively, a single sheet of material can be folded over and seamed around the periphery to form internal chamber 40. In another embodiment, body 36 can be formed from a continuous tubular extrusion of polymeric material that is cut to length and the ends seamed closed.
In still other embodiments, body 36 can comprises a three-dimensional bag that not only has an annular side wall but also a two dimensional top end wall 48 and a two dimensional bottom end wall 50. Three dimensional body 36 comprises a plurality of discrete panels, typically three or more, and more commonly four or six. Each panel is substantially identical and comprises a portion of the side wall, top end wall, and bottom end wall of body 36. Corresponding perimeter edges of each panel are seamed. The seams are typically formed using methods known in the art such as heat energies, RF energies, sonics, or other sealing energies.
In alternative embodiments, the panels can be formed in a variety of different patterns. Further disclosure with regard to one method of manufacturing three-dimensional bags is disclosed in United States Patent Publication No. US 2002-0131654 A1 that was published Sep. 19, 2002 of which the drawings and Detailed Description are hereby incorporated by reference.
It is appreciated that body 36 can be manufactured to have virtually any desired size, shape, and configuration. For example, body 36 can be formed having chamber 40 sized to 10 liters, 30 liters, 100 liters, 250 liters, 500 liters, 750 liters, 1,000 liters, 1,500 liters, 3,000 liters, 5,000 liters, 10,000 liters or other desired volumes. Although body 36 can be any shape, in one embodiment body 36 is specifically configured to be complementary or substantially complementary to compartment 20 of support housing 12.
In any embodiment, however, it is desirable that when body 36 is received within compartment 20, body 36 is uniformly supported by support housing 12. Having at least generally uniform support of body 36 by support housing 12 helps to preclude failure of body 36 by hydraulic forces applied to body 36 when filled with fluid.
Although in the above discussed embodiment container 32 has a flexible, bag-like configuration, in alternative embodiments it is appreciated that container 32 can comprise any form of collapsible container or semi-rigid container. Furthermore, in contrast to having a closed top end wall 48, container 32 can comprise an open top liner. Container 14 can also be transparent or opaque and can have ultraviolet light inhibitors incorporated therein.
Mounted on top end wall 48 are a plurality of ports 52 which are in fluid communication with chamber 40. Although two ports 52 are shown, it is appreciated that one or three or more ports 52 can be present depending on the intended use of container 32. As such, each port 52 can serve a different purpose depending on the type processing to be undertaken. For example, ports 52 can be coupled with a tube 54 for dispensing fluid or other components into chamber 40 or withdrawing fluid from chamber 40. In addition, such as when container 32 is used as a bioreactor for growing cells or microorganisms, ports 52 can be used to provide various probes, such as temperature probes, pH probes, dissolved oxygen probes, and the like, access to chamber 40.
Extending through bottom end wall 50 of container 32 is a hole 60. Hole 60 is aligned with opening 24 on floor 22 of support housing 12. A portion of sparger 34 extends through hole 60 and opening 24. Sparger 34 is sealed to body 36 of container 32 so that fluid cannot leak out through hole 60. In general, sparger 34 comprises a base 62 having a flexible, gas permeable sparging sheet 64 mounted thereon.
Turning to
In one embodiment, base 62 is molded from a soft, resiliently flexible polymeric material or elastomeric material such as polyethylene, silicone or KRATON® having a durometer on a Shore A scale with a value of less than 90 and more preferably less than 70 but typically greater than 5. In other embodiments, other thermoset or thermoplastic polymers having a durometer in the above range can also be used. Other materials such as those previously discussed with regard to container 32 can also be used. In some embodiments, as a result of the material properties, tubular member 66 can be manually folded over so as to kink passage 76 closed or tubular member 66 can be manually pinched to close passage 76 wherein in each case tubular member 66 will resiliently return to the original configuration with no permanent deformation.
In one embodiment, flange 78 has a maximum diameter typically in a range between about 2 cm to about 30 cm with about 5 cm to about 15 cm being more common. Tubular member 66 typically has a length in a range between about 2 cm to about 30 cm with about 5 cm to about 15 cm being more common. Likewise, tubular member 66 typically has a maximum inner diameter in a range between about 0.2 cm to about 5 cm with about 0.5 cm to about 3 cm being more common. In alternative embodiments, it is appreciated that each of the above dimensions can be varied. For example, if desired tubular member 66 can comprise an elongated tube having a length of one meter or longer. It is further noted that in the present embodiment second end 74 of tubular member 66 has a smooth, substantially cylindrical configuration on interior surface 68 and exterior surface 70 with no flanges, barbs, or other projections extending therefrom.
One of the benefits of base 62 is that it is more easily adaptable for coupling with tubes of different diameter or configuration. For example, it is envisioned that container system 30, which comprises container 32 and sparger 34, could be sold to an end user as a single unit. In turn, the established system of the end user may have a variety of different sizes or types of gas hoses that would connect with tubular member 66 of sparger 34 for delivering gas thereto. As a result of flexible tubular member 66, only a single coupler having opposing ends with predefined sizes is needed to couple tubular member 66 to the gas hose. For example, depicted in
In contrast, if a conventional barbed stem were formed on flange 78, it would be necessary to first couple a tube to the barbed stem and then use coupler 88 to account for the change in size of gas line 96. As a result, tubular member 66 provides for a more universal connection. Furthermore, as a result of flange 78 and tubular member 66 both being comprised of a soft and flexible material, container 32 can folded and/or rolled up for transport and/or storage without fear of damage to sparger 34 and/or container 32.
Turning to
In one embodiment sparging sheet 64 can be secured to flange 78 by directly welding the perimeter edge 86 of sparging sheet 64 to flange 78. Depending on the type of material used for sparging sheet 64 and flange 78, conventional welding techniques such as heat welding, RF energy, ultrasonic, and the like can be used. In still other embodiments, various forms of adhesives can be used to connect sparging sheet 64 to flange 78. In addition, there are numerous forms of mechanical type fasteners that can be used to form the connection. For example, one or more crimps or clamps can be used to secure sparging sheet 64 to flange 78. Other conventional fastening techniques can also be used.
In contrast to securing sparging sheet 64 directly to flange 78, a transition member can be used therebetween. For example, depicted in
Depending on the type of material used for sparging sheet 64, using transition member 55 can produce a number of benefits. For example, as will be discussed below in greater detail, one type of material that can be used for sparging sheet 64 is a spun-bonded olefin material such as that commonly sold under the tradename TYVEK®. However, heat welding a non-coated spun-bonded olefin material to flange 78 can cause the spun-bonded olefin material to thin, thereby decreasing its structural strength. When gas is applied to sparger 34, a high stress, point load is formed at the inside intersection between sparging sheet 64 and flange 78. Depending on the amount of thinning of sparging sheet 64, this load can result in failure of sparging sheet 64. By using transition member 55, the high stress, point load caused by the gas is formed between flange 78 and transition member 55 which, due to material compatibilities, can easily withstand the load without failure. By welding sparging sheet 64 onto the freely movable first end 58 of transition member 55, the load between sparging sheet 64 and transition member 55 is uniformly applied in shear across the weld between the two members. This decreased load can be easily handled by sparging sheet 64 even after thinning.
In another alternative embodiment as depicted in
Sparging sheet 64 can be comprised of a variety of different materials having a variety of different properties. As previously discussed, sparging sheet 64 is typically comprised of a sheet of gas permeable flexible material. Sparging sheet 64 typically has a thickness in a range between about 20 μm to about 2.5 cm, with about 20 μm to about 5000 μm being common, about 20 μm to about 1,000 μm being more common, and 50 μm to about 300 μm being still more common. Sparging sheet 64 can also have a burst strength in a range between about 2 psig (14 kPa) to about 50 psig (343 kPa), with about 2 psig (14 kPa) to about 25 psig (172 kPa) being more common, and about 2 psig (14 kPa) to about 10 psig (68 kPa) being even more common. Sparging sheet 64 can also be produced having a porosity in a range between about 0.1 to about 300 (sec/100 cc IN2), with about 5 to about 100 (sec/100 cc IN2) being common, 5 to about 60 (sec/100 cc IN2) being more common, and about 5 to about 30 (sec/100 cc IN2) being still more common as measured using the quantitative property of Gurley Hill Porosity. Such thicknesses, burst strength, and porosity can vary and depend in large part on the type of material being used.
In some embodiments, sparging sheet 64 is comprised of a material that is both vapor-permeable and water-resistant. That is, although the gas can pass through sparging sheet 64, water and some other fluids are prevented from flowing therethrough when not in use. Similarly, sparging sheet 64 may be constructed so as to only allow gas to pass therethrough when it is subject to sufficiently high gas pressure. It is often desirable to have a material with high permeability while maintaining hydrophobicity, strength, weldability, biocompatibility, and gamma stability.
It is also often desirable to have a flexible material that welds readily to common materials used in conventional ports and films (such as films discussed with regard to container 32). For example, the flexible nature of a soft or paper like film can allow it to be folded during manufacturing, packaging, loading, and use of the bioreactor. It may also be desirous to allow for the surface area and shape of the sparge material to easily be modified or changed according to weld or cut pattern.
Examples of select types of materials that can be used in the formation of sparging sheet 64 include: (1) polymeric nonwoven fabrics, (2) solvent cast polymeric films, (3) open cell foamed polymer sheets, and (4) perforated polymeric sheets. As used herein, the term “nonwoven fabric” means a web having a structure of individual fibers or threads that are interlaid, but not in an identifiable manner such as in knitted or woven fabric. Nonwoven fabrics can be formed by many processes such as for example, meltblowing processes, spunbonding processes, hydroentangling, air-laid and bonded carded web processing. One specific type of nonwoven fabric that has been found particularly useful in the present invention is spun-bonded olefin materials that are commonly sold under the tradename TYVEK®. TYVEK® is typically formed by a process using continuous and very fine fibers that are comprised of a high-density polyethylene. The fibers typically having an average diameter in a range between about 2 micrometers to about 8 micrometers. These fibers are flashspun and then laid as a web on a moving belt in a randomly distributed and nondirectional pattern. Finally, the web of fibers are bonded together using heat and pressure. The final web typically has a thickness in a range between about 50 microns to about 250 microns.
TYVEK® has been found useful in view of its favorable qualities of having high permeability while maintaining hydrophobicity, strength, weldability, biocompatibility, and gamma stability. TYVEK® film can be produced having a porosity in a range between about 6 to about 30 (sec/100 cc IN2) as measured using the quantitative property of Gurley Hill Porosity. Permeability rated according to the methods of Bendtsen Air Permeability are often in a range between about 400 to about 2000 (ml/min). Medical grades of TYVEK® typically have a relative pore size of about 20 (micrometers) and a surface energy of about 25 to about 32 (dynes/cm). Moisture Vapor Transmission Rates (MTVR) often ranges from about 1500 to about 1640 (g/m2/24 hrs).
As used herein, the term “solvent cast polymeric films” means polymeric films that are initially produced with a solvent. The solvent is removed during the production process so that the resulting film has a desired porosity. Examples of cast polymeric films include polytetrafluoroethylene sold under the tradename TEFLON®, polysulfone, polypropylene, silicone, KYNAR® (PVDF), GORTEX® and the like. In one embodiment, the cast polymeric films can be attached is a porous support layer such as a woven fabric or one of the other materials described herein.
Open cell foamed polymer sheets are well known in the art and can be formed from a variety of different polymeric materials such as low density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, polypropylene, or polyurethane. The materials are foamed with a gas using conventional processes to form an open cell structure that is porous to gas. It is envisioned that open cell foamed polymer sheets will typically have a thickness in a range between about 1 mm to about 25 mm.
Perforated polymeric sheets include sheets of polymeric material that are formed using conventional processes, such as extrusion, and are then subsequently perforated so as to make the sheet porous. The small perforated holes can be produced such as by being punched or embossed into the sheet. In one embodiment the perforated holes can have a diameter in a range between about 20 μm to about 5 mm with about 20 μm to about 500 μm being more common. Perforated polymeric sheets can be produced from a variety of different materials such as polyethylene, different fluorinated polymers and other materials as previously discussed with regard to body 36.
In some embodiments, sparging sheet 64 can include a combination or laminate of two or more of the above types of materials.
Returning to
During operation, container system 30 is positioned within compartment 20 of support housing 12 so that tubular member 66 of sparger 34 passes down through opening 24 in floor 22 of support housing 12. Gas line 96 is then coupled with tubular member 66 using coupler 88 as previously discussed. In alternative embodiments, tubular member 66 can be formed as an elongated tube which can extend directly to the gas source.
Next, a fluid 104 is dispensed into chamber 40 of container 32 by way of port 52. Fluid 104 can comprise a variety of different materials. For example, where container system 30 is being used as a bioreactor for growing cells or microorganisms, fluid 104 can comprise a growth media that is dependent upon the type of cells or microorganism being cultured. The fluid can also include a seed inoculum such as bacteria, fungi, algae, plant cells, animal cells, protozoans, nematodes, or the like. The present invention can also be used for non-biological systems. For example, the system can be used for processing or mixing solutions where it is desired to control or regulate the pH or partial pressure of gas within a solution.
Once fluid 104 is disposed within chamber 40 of container 32 and/or simultaneously with the filling thereof, a gas can be delivered through gas line 96 so as to enter compartment 100 of sparger 34. The gas migrates through sparging sheet 64 where it then contacts fluid 104 within chamber 40. Because of the relatively large surface area of sparging sheet 64 and the small pore size thereof, the gas passes out through sparging sheet 64 in the form of microbubble that can be easily entrained within fluid 104. Again, the type of gas passing through sparger 34 depends upon the type of processing needed for the fluid within chamber 40. Where cells are microorganisms are being cultured, the gas typically comprises air that is selectively combined with oxygen, carbon dioxide, and/or nitrogen. Again, in other embodiments specific gases, such as those identified above, or combinations of gases can be passed through sparger 34.
As also depicted in
Although not required, in one embodiment means are provided for mixing fluid 104 within chamber 40. By way of example and not by limitation, in one embodiment a drive shaft 110 projects into chamber 40 and has an impeller 112 mounted on the end thereof. External rotation of drive shaft 110 thus facilitates rotation of impeller 112 which mixes and/or suspends fluid 104 within chamber 40. Sparger 34 is typically disposed directly below the means for mixing such that the mixing or movement of fluid 104 produced by the mixer helps to entrain the gas bubbles within fluid 104. One specific example of how to incorporate a rotational mixer into a flexible container is disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0239199 A1, published Oct. 27, 2005 which is incorporated herein by specific reference. Another example is disclosed in U.S. Publication No. 2006/0280028 A1, published Dec. 14, 2006, which is incorporated herein by specific reference.
In an alternative embodiment of the means for mixing, mixing can be accomplished by vertically reciprocally moving a vertical mixer within chamber 40. For example, depicted in
A shaft 133 extends down mixing disk 130 and passes out through an opening in container 32. Outside of container 32, shaft 133 connects with a drive mechanism for selectively raising and lower shaft 133 at a desired frequency and over a desired height. A flexible diaphragm 134 extends between container 32 and shaft 133 so as to form a sealed fluid connection between shaft 133 and container 32. As shaft 133 raises and lowers, flexible diaphragm 134 flexes to allow free movement of shaft 133 and thus mixing disk 130. Further disclosure with regard to the assembly and operation of vertical mixer 129 is disclosed in US Publication No. 2006/0196501, published Sep. 7, 2006, which is incorporated herein by specific reference. In yet other embodiments, it is appreciated that the mixing can be accomplished by simply circulating fluid through chamber 40 such as by using a peristaltic pump to move fluid in and out of chamber 40. Other conventional mixing techniques can also be used.
Welding sparger 34 onto container 32 can provide for a high level of surface area while providing a low-profile sparge. In some embodiments, this can reduce turbulence near impeller 112 and/or reduce the possibility of cells accumulating in cracks, seams, or crevices. Furthermore, using a single use disposable container system 30 may be helpful in avoiding or reducing contamination and cleaning issues that may be associated with some conventional spargers, which sometimes involve cleaning numerous holes, pores, and crevices of such units. For example, small void areas in some spargers may present areas for cell debris or other material to lodge and accumulate leading to increased occurrence of contamination. In some cases, this may carry over in subsequent runs.
As previously discussed, one purpose of using sparger 34 in a cell culture is to aid in the mass transfer of oxygen (kLa), which is often necessary for the respiration of the growing cells. An advantage of using sparger 34 in a single use bioreactor is that the tortuous pore structure of sparging sheet 64, such as when TYVEK® is used, can allow for a beneficial effect on mass transfer of oxygen from the bulk gas introduced through sparger 34. In some embodiments, it is desirable to have small bubbles introduced into the bioreactor as they can benefit mass transfer. Mass transfer across a permeable membrane can occur independent of mass transfer resulting from a gas bubble. Relatedly, a long gas retention time within the fluid column and a higher surface to volume ratios are often desirable effects.
It is generally accepted that the bubble size can be dominated by surface tension effects, inherently related to the component ratio of salts, proteins, sugars, and micro and macro components of the nutrient media. Experimentally calculated kLa values, visual observation, and data from bioreactor runs often indicate that bubble size and perhaps improved mass transfer are qualities of the present sparge approaches. The composition and rheological properties of the liquid, mixing intensity, turnover rate of the fluid, bubble size, presence of cell clumping, and interfacial absorption characteristics all influence mass transfer of gas such as oxygen to the cells. Main driving forces of mass transfer include surface area and concentration gradient. In many cases, a main source of resistance of oxygen mass transfer in a stirred tank bioreactor can be the liquid film surrounding the gas bubble.
By using TYVEK® and the other similar gas permeable membranes as discussed above, the surface area of sparging sheet 64 can easily be increased. In some embodiments, the oxygen gradient between sparging sheet 64 and the liquid interface can be maintained at a high level through constant replenishment directly through a sparge inlet. Further, a rapid mixing intensity can also benefit mass transfer as the impeller 112 pumps media directly down onto sparging sheet 64. The use of a gas permeable membrane can allow for mass transfer of oxygen across the bulk film surface, which can be in addition to the formation of bubbles that rise within the fluid column.
In many cases, small bubbles can lead to greater foaming at the top of a bioreactor, which can have negative effects on cell viability and kLa according to Henry's law and the solubility of gases related to partial pressures. This boundary layer often results in a reduced ability to control dissolved oxygen levels within the bulk liquid. Typically, it is desirable to avoid or mitigate the presence of foam, as excessive amounts can result in exhaust filter blocking and run failure. The novel sparger approaches described herein can provide the desired mass transfer properties, often with reduced levels of foam generated as compared to conventional systems. This may be due to greater efficacy and less gas being introduced through the sparger to maintain a target oxygen solubility.
It is appreciated that sparger 34 can come in a variety of different sizes, shapes, designs, and configurations. By way of example and not by limitation, depicted in
Sparger 120 is substantially identical to sparger 34 except that tubular member 66 has been lengthened and a flange 128 encircles tubular member 66 and radially outward projects therefrom at a location between the opposing ends of tubular member 66. Flange has an outer diameter substantially the same as the outer diameter of lip 124 such that by positioning flange 128 against annular lip 124, a clamp 126 can secure flange 128 to annular lip 124, thereby sealing opening 24 closed. In this embodiment, fluid 104 can be dispensed directly into compartment 20 of support housing 12 and sparger 120 can be used to sparge fluid 104 therein. In view of the foregoing, sparger 120 can be retrofitted into existing rigid containers where the container is cleaned and sterilized between uses. However, sparger 120 remains a single use item that can be disposed of after each use.
Depicted in
In the embodiment depicted, a substantially circular sparging sheet 154 is provided having an inside edge 156 that bounds a central opening 157 and an outside edge 158. Inside edges 150 and 156 and outside edges 152 and 158 are sealed together, respectively, using previously discussed techniques such as welding, adhesive, or mechanical fastener. As a result, a compartment 160 is formed between base 142 and sparging sheet 154. Sparging sheet 154 can have the same properties as previously discussed with regard to sparging sheet 64. Furthermore, in this embodiment and all other embodiments discussed herein, one or more transition members 55 can be used to connect the sparging sheets to a separate structure such as base 142.
A tube 162 is coupled with sparging sheet 154. Tube 162 can be selectively coupled with a gas source for delivering the gas to compartment 160. Sparger 140 can be secured to a container such as by being welded or otherwise secured to bottom end wall 50 of container 32. For example inner edge 150 and/or outer edge 152 can be welded or otherwise secured to container 32.
Alternatively, sparger 140 can simply be positioned on the floor of container 32 or on the floor of support housing 12. Sparger 140 can be held in place by being weighted or other removable fastening techniques can be used to secure sparger 140 in place. With sparger 140 positioned in place, tube 162 can extend out through one of ports 52. Alternatively, tube 162 can be coupled with base 142 and then extend out through a hole in the bottom of container 32 and/or support housing 12. In alternative modifications to sparger 140, hole 144 can be eliminated on base 142 and/or hole 157 can be eliminated on sparging sheet 154. In yet another modification, base 142 can be made of the same material as sparging sheet 154.
Depicted in
Depicted in
Sparger 190 further comprises a tubular member 202 having a first end 204 coupled with second sparging sheet 196 and an opposing second end 206. Tubular member 202 bounds a passage 208 that communicates with compartment 200. It is appreciated that sparger 190 can be used with a reusable rigid container or a disposable flexible container. In the embodiment depicted, container 32 is depicted having a tubular port 210 mounted on bottom end wall 50. A coupling tube 212 has a first end 214 connected to port 210 and an opposing second end 216 connected a coupler 218. Coupler 218 includes an outside stem 220 that is received within second end 216 of coupling tube 212 so as to form a sealed engagement therewith, an inside stem 222 that is coupled with second end 206 of tubular member 202, and a distal stem 224 that is in fluid communication with inside stem 222 and is adapted to couple with a gas line. In this configuration, gas can be delivered to compartment 200 of sparger 190 by being passed through coupling tube 212 while maintaining compartment 40 of container 32 sealed closed. It is appreciated that there are a variety of different coupling techniques and couplers that can be used to coupler sparger 190 to container 32 so that a gas can be delivered to sparger 190.
Depicted in
In the depicted embodiment, compartment 236 defines a dome-shaped space. Sparger assembly configurations such as those described herein can allow the surface area and corresponding gas flow rate requirements of, for example, sparging sheet 234, to be adjusted by utilizing different size shapes such as the dome shown here. As previously discussed, some embodiments of the present invention may include a check valve inline coupled with a tubing that is attached to port 172, which can prevent fluid backflow.
In alternative embodiments, port 172 can be replaced with base 62 as previously discussed with regard to
In still other embodiments, it is appreciated that sparging sheet 234 and port 172 can be mounted at a variety of different location on container 32. In addition, sparging sheet 234 can be formed having any desired configuration. Port 172 can be replaced with a variety of alternative types of ports that can be used for coupling with a gas line and delivering a gas to compartment 236.
Depicted in
Depicted in
The spargers of the present invention can also be used for the removal or stripping of undesirable dissolved compounds within the liquid. For example, a separate sparger, either used in conjunction or separately from the main sparger, can be used in a bioreactor to remove waste products created as a bioproduct of the biochemical reaction or cellular respiration (such as carbon dioxide). This sparger can be configured with larger pores in an effort to allow the undesirable dissolved gas components to be driven from the media in an effort to control variables such as pH, dissolved oxygen, or other process parameters.
It is appreciated that the foregoing embodiments are simply examples of alternative methods of forming spargers of the present invention. It is likewise appreciated that the various features of the different embodiments can be mixed and matched to produce still other embodiments.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/265,022, filed Sep. 14, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/041,335, filed Feb. 11, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,457,012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/663,068, filed Mar. 19, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,259,692, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/094,541, filed Dec. 2, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,005,971, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/385,541, filed Mar. 20, 2006, U.S. Pat. No. 8,603,805, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/112,834, filed Apr. 22, 2005, U.S. Pat. No. 7,384,783, which are incorporated herein by specific reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1269189 | Kadish | Jun 1918 | A |
1471332 | Greenawalt | Oct 1923 | A |
1505204 | Kiernan | Aug 1924 | A |
2259243 | Daman | Oct 1941 | A |
2341114 | Novak | Feb 1944 | A |
2865618 | Abell | Dec 1958 | A |
3074544 | Bollmeier et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3184395 | Brewer | May 1965 | A |
3207420 | Navarrete-Kindelan | Sep 1965 | A |
3545671 | Ross | Dec 1970 | A |
3608709 | Pike | Sep 1971 | A |
3647397 | Coleman | Mar 1972 | A |
3682168 | Deaton | Aug 1972 | A |
3701433 | Krakauer | Oct 1972 | A |
3702619 | Son | Nov 1972 | A |
3796417 | Kaelin | Mar 1974 | A |
4012471 | Kunkle, Jr. | Mar 1977 | A |
4012473 | Lindsey et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4025590 | Igich | May 1977 | A |
4036919 | Komendowski et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4061698 | Thornwald | Dec 1977 | A |
4100235 | Thornwald | Jul 1978 | A |
4157965 | Raible | Jun 1979 | A |
4204774 | de Bruyne | May 1980 | A |
4250039 | Cozzi et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4391912 | Yoshida | Jul 1983 | A |
4402402 | Pike | Sep 1983 | A |
4458811 | Wilkinson | Jul 1984 | A |
4465645 | Kaelin | Aug 1984 | A |
4493637 | Ganter et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4581143 | Pepper | Apr 1986 | A |
4588554 | Kaartinen | May 1986 | A |
4668632 | Young et al. | May 1987 | A |
4684486 | Ricchio | Aug 1987 | A |
4727040 | Freedman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740202 | Stacey et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4749654 | Karrer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4814124 | Aoyama et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4869398 | Colvin | Sep 1989 | A |
4869852 | Goudy, Jr. et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4981623 | Ryan | Jan 1991 | A |
5008197 | Wergeland et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023119 | Yamaloshi | Jun 1991 | A |
5057429 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5139946 | Howell et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5183595 | Schüssler | Feb 1993 | A |
RE34386 | Davidson et al. | Sep 1993 | E |
5270207 | Matsumura et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5287961 | Herran | Feb 1994 | A |
5376271 | Morgan, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5416022 | Amiot | May 1995 | A |
5422043 | Burris | Jun 1995 | A |
5431496 | Balteau | Jul 1995 | A |
5431498 | Balteau | Jul 1995 | A |
5443985 | Lu et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458771 | Todd | Oct 1995 | A |
5487470 | Pharo | Jan 1996 | A |
5547108 | Gsell | Aug 1996 | A |
5565015 | Kobayashi | Oct 1996 | A |
5578459 | Gordon | Nov 1996 | A |
5693537 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5763267 | Kurjan | Jun 1998 | A |
5788661 | Japuntich | Aug 1998 | A |
5799830 | Carroll et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5858015 | Fini | Jan 1999 | A |
5858283 | Burris | Jan 1999 | A |
5897997 | Louvel | Apr 1999 | A |
5910138 | Sperko | Jun 1999 | A |
5925293 | Howk | Jul 1999 | A |
5941635 | Stewart | Aug 1999 | A |
6017598 | Kreischer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6068775 | Custer | May 2000 | A |
6071005 | Ekambaram et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083587 | Smith et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086574 | Carroll et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099734 | Boggs | Aug 2000 | A |
6117801 | McGinty et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6146875 | Ward | Nov 2000 | A |
6186932 | Vallot | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219871 | Frederick et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245555 | Curtis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250796 | Huang | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251295 | Johnson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
H1989 | Fell et al. | Sep 2001 | H |
6367783 | Raftis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391638 | Shaaltiel | May 2002 | B1 |
6398195 | Sherman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406005 | Lawson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6432698 | Gaugler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439756 | Forschner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464211 | Downs | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468792 | Bader | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494613 | Terentiev | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6518057 | Morrison | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6596521 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6632658 | Schoeb | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642019 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6649405 | Alms et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673598 | Akers et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6709862 | Curtis | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712963 | Schick | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6745902 | Lunn et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6884866 | Bronshtein et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908223 | Bibbo et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6923567 | Bibbo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6969367 | Hosheng | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7141203 | Way et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7198225 | Chiba | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7278780 | Goodwin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7326355 | Graetz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7384027 | Terentiev et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7384783 | Kunas et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390652 | Condon | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7431837 | Cohee et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448601 | Boer | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7469884 | Terentiev et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7629167 | Hodge et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7681867 | Hu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682067 | West et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7935101 | Muramatsu | May 2011 | B2 |
8282267 | Castillo et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8485727 | Trouilly | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8603805 | Goodwin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8960486 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9005971 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9079690 | Pavlik | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9259692 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9376655 | Larsen | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9643133 | Goodwin et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9968519 | Pavlik | May 2018 | B2 |
20010031491 | Curtis | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020063347 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020131654 | Smith et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030036192 | Singh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030077466 | Smith et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030119185 | Berenson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040058436 | Zhang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062140 | Cadogan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095842 | Weetman | May 2004 | A1 |
20040134802 | Inoue | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210288 | Karapetyan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050032205 | Smith | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050158851 | Furey | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050218075 | Graetz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239199 | Kunas et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242114 | Savage et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272146 | Hodge et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282269 | Proulx | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060054557 | Hori et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060196501 | Bibbo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060270036 | Goodwin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080068920 | Galliher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080139865 | Galliher | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080234654 | McCarthy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080293133 | Reid et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090035856 | Galliher et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090113753 | Pepper | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140005 | Reichert et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100072216 | Voute | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078395 | Shevitz | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100174099 | Behkish et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100264100 | Rivera | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110013473 | Ludwig et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014689 | Gandlur | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020922 | Wuenn et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110070648 | Anneren | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120238011 | Tuohey et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120313267 | Pradel et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130158635 | Federico et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150069072 | Kelley | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150118753 | Brau | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160244710 | Wood | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160304825 | Larsen et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2214384 | Oct 1996 | CA |
675368 | Sep 1990 | CH |
101696388 | Apr 2010 | CN |
101977673 | Feb 2011 | CN |
200 07 347 | Aug 2000 | DE |
20 2010 013 812 | Feb 2011 | DE |
0 343 885 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0 725 134 | Jul 1996 | EP |
1 602 715 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2 519 020 | Jan 1983 | FR |
2 797 887 | Mar 2001 | FR |
2 799 138 | Apr 2001 | FR |
2 202 549 | Sep 1988 | GB |
50-119561 | Sep 1975 | JP |
58-224683 | Dec 1983 | JP |
61-067476 | Apr 1986 | JP |
62-160899 | Jul 1987 | JP |
S6384483 | Apr 1988 | JP |
2-31825 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-283274 | Nov 1990 | JP |
03-010675 | Jan 1991 | JP |
03-242297 | Oct 1991 | JP |
05-336957 | Dec 1993 | JP |
06-153902 | Jun 1994 | JP |
70-08264 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07-155170 | Jun 1995 | JP |
82-24076 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2007-511230 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-099071 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-150972 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-313718 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-502716 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-299478 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2001-258547 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-101867 | May 2007 | JP |
2008-536685 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2 220 917 | Jan 2004 | RU |
9215491 | Sep 1992 | WO |
9630497 | Oct 1996 | WO |
0125394 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0241484 | May 2002 | WO |
05068059 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005118771 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006116067 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007134267 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008040568 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008157181 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009115241 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009153425 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011025890 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011079165 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2012158108 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013049692 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/577,143, filed Jun. 4, 2004, Hodge. |
DuPont Medical Packaging, Technical Reference Guide for Medical Packaging, The Miracles of Science, 2002. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 15, 2012 issued in EP Application No. 06750951.3, filed Apr. 21, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170246603 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15265022 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 15596952 | US | |
Parent | 15041335 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15265022 | US | |
Parent | 14663068 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15041335 | US | |
Parent | 14094541 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14663068 | US | |
Parent | 11385541 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 14094541 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11112834 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11385541 | US |