This application is a 371 of International PCT Application PCT/FR2014/051974 filed Jul. 30, 2014, which claims priority to French Patent Application No. 1359014 filed Sep. 19, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention concerns a gas supply device. More particularly, the invention concerns a device for supplying gas or fluid, comprising a support frame accommodating a plurality of pressurized fluid cylinders connected to a fluidic circuit to ensure the extraction from or filling of the cylinders, said circuit comprising at least one first connecting end connected to said cylinders via a first isolating valve to allow the filling of and extraction from the cylinders, the support frame comprising a base on which the cylinders rest, and a set of uprights and transverse beams defining a cage of generally parallelepipedic form for holding the cylinders, the frame comprising, on one of its side faces called the front face, an interface panel comprising at least one opening for access to the circuit.
The invention also concerns gas supply devices sometimes known as frames.
Such a device is described for example in documents DE20103682U1, GB2007348 A1 or DE102011014065 A1.
Such devices generally use a bundle of cylinders which store gas at high pressure, for example 200 bar, 300 bar or above.
These devices must comply with various requirements which are often contradictory, for example a cylinder filling circuit compatible with the high flows and pressures and allowing satisfactory mixtures of gas (in terms of homogeneity and/or filling time in particular), an extraction circuit offering safety of use for the user, good ergonomics for the user limiting the risk of accident, easy handling of the frame limiting the risks of accident, in particular in the case where the frames are transported strapped onto vehicles.
One aim of the present invention is to remedy all or part of the drawbacks of the prior art outlined above.
To this end, the gas supply device according to the invention, otherwise in accordance with the generic definition given by the preamble above, is essentially characterized in that the side face called the rear face of the frame, which is situated opposite the front face, is delimited by uprights having a length greater than the length of the uprights of the front face, i.e. the rear face has a height greater than the height of the front face.
Also, embodiments of the invention may comprise one or more of the following characteristics:
The invention may also concern any alternative device or method comprising any combination of the characteristics above or below.
Further features and advantages will appear from reading the description which follows, given with reference to the figures in which:
The gas supply device 1 shown diagrammatically in
For example, the cylinders 3 are arranged in a bundle vertically on a base 130. The openings of the cylinders 3 are connected to a fluidic circuit 4, 5 for ensuring the extraction or filling of the cylinders 3 (cf.
For example, the circuit 4, 5 comprises a first connecting end 6 connected to the cylinders 3 via a first isolating valve 7 to allow the filling of and extraction from the cylinders 3. The circuit may comprise a second, separate, connecting end 8 connected to the openings of the cylinders 3 via a second isolating valve 9 and a pressure relief valve 10.
As illustrated as an example in
The frame 2 comprises a set of four vertical uprights 30, the lower ends of which are connected respectively to the four corners of the square (or parallelepipedic) base.
The vertical uprights 30 may have a U-shaped or parallelepipedic cross-section and be oriented to present a flat surface at the level of the vertical edges of the frame 2.
The frame 2 also comprises horizontal transverse beams 31, 32, 33 on the side faces of a cage of generally parallelepipedic form, for holding the cylinders 3 (cf.
In particular, the frame 2 may comprise four lower transverse beams 33, four intermediate transverse beams 31, and four upper transverse beams 32.
As illustrated in
The frame 2 comprises, on one of its side faces known as the front face 35, an interface panel 20 comprising at least one opening and, as described in more detail below, preferably a plurality of openings 23, 24, 25 for access to the circuit 4, 5 and in particular the elements of the circuit.
According to one advantageous feature, the rear side face 36 of the frame 2, i.e. the side face situated opposite the front face 35, is delimited by uprights 30 having a length (height) greater than the length (height) of the uprights 30 of the front face 35. This means that the rear face 36 has a height greater than the height of the front face 35.
This allows the user to distinguish, even from a distance, the functional front face from the other faces of the frame. In particular, this facilitates identification of and access to the user interfaces for the operators (e.g. control panel, valves and connections etc.). The ergonomics of the device are improved.
Furthermore, this difference in height between the front and the rear of the frame 2 has other advantages. In fact, this configuration prevents a user from stacking several devices. Furthermore, in the typical case where two devices 1 are strapped back to back in a vertical plane on a support 40, such as a truck trailer, via one or more straps 42, this architecture generates oblique forces on the frames 2 in an oblique fashion, tending to hold them back to back. This further limits the risk of tilting of the frames 2.
The upper end of the frame 2 may comprise, in addition, at least one and preferably at least two vertical protrusions 38 protruding upward relative to the transverse beams 32, in order to form a stop preventing the lateral slippage of the straps 42. For example, these vertical protrusions protrude beyond the roof of the frame by 2 to 20 mm.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The upper transverse beams 32, connecting an upright 30 of the rear face to an upright 30, may thus be rectilinear and inclined downward from rear to front and/or curved with the concavity oriented towards the base 34.
The frame 2 may comprise a central post 37, the lower end of which is fixed to the central part of the base 130 and the upper end of which comprises a handling ring 39 for the frame which protrudes beyond the parallelepipedic volume of the cage (cf.
This central post 37 may receive the lifting forces on handling of the frame 2. This avoids the use of lifting cables and elevated intervention operations. This structure also lightens the structure, since it allows separation of the lifting function (traction) from that linked to fall resistance and lateral protection. The upper part of the frame 2 is free to allow easy introduction of a preassembled circuit 4, 5 which is introduced into the frame from above. This limits the assembly time in production. This structure also helps hold the cylinders, limiting the risk of stress/mechanical fatigue during handling.
As shown in
The upper geometry of the frame 2 allows improvement of the shock resistance of the frame, as described below.
The uprights 30 (in particular their upper part and the relative arrangement) are thus provided to deform under the impact of the shock in the case of tilting of the assembly of the frame from a height equivalent to that of a semitrailer or loading dock.
This deformation of the uprights in case of falling of the frame 2 allows absorption of part of the impact energy. This means that only part of the frame's deceleration is transmitted to the cylinders and their fixings.
This helps preserve the gas circuit 4, 5 of the frame by avoiding excessive deformation thereof due to the displacement of the cylinders relative to each other.
This allows a significant limitation in the risks of gas leakage under high pressure.
The resulting deformation of the frame 2 also protects the frame from impact against the pressurized gas control elements (such as valves, pressure relief valves etc.), thus helping conserve the integrity of the high-pressure gas circuit.
Thus, while being simple in construction and inexpensive, the device has a number of advantages in comparison with known systems.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 59014 | Sep 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/051974 | 7/30/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/040295 | 3/26/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2313965 | Pierson | Mar 1943 | A |
3602368 | Gould | Aug 1971 | A |
3934926 | Bennett | Jan 1976 | A |
3993344 | Bennett | Nov 1976 | A |
4061391 | Violette | Dec 1977 | A |
4295431 | Stavlo | Oct 1981 | A |
4542774 | Stavlo | Sep 1985 | A |
4564109 | Stavlo | Jan 1986 | A |
4642007 | Marshall | Feb 1987 | A |
4967934 | Andonian | Nov 1990 | A |
5078415 | Goral | Jan 1992 | A |
5176265 | Bennett | Jan 1993 | A |
5292012 | Davis | Mar 1994 | A |
5404921 | Lamoreaux et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5573360 | Bennett | Nov 1996 | A |
5954099 | Princiotta | Sep 1999 | A |
5975121 | Arzenton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6059127 | Bennett | May 2000 | A |
6067913 | Bennett | May 2000 | A |
6405882 | Baxter | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6494549 | Van Daalwyk | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6685404 | Udivich | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7017741 | Williamson | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7070372 | Denike | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7275902 | Klotz | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7707795 | Yu | May 2010 | B2 |
7997213 | Gauthier | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8016300 | Cramer | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20080110784 | Nowicki | May 2008 | A1 |
20090200333 | Bauer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090283351 | Cannet et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110049194 | Cannet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120175375 | Ligonesche et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120261425 | Lang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140026991 | Verghade et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140290797 | Kriese | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150308620 | Frenal | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 19 779 | Nov 1996 | DE |
2010 3682 | May 2001 | DE |
20 2004 000771 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10 2011 014 065 | Sep 2012 | DE |
10 2012 004391 | Sep 2013 | DE |
2 735 209 | Dec 1996 | FR |
2 828 922 | Feb 2003 | FR |
2 970 314 | Jul 2012 | FR |
2 985 802 | Jul 2013 | FR |
2007 348 | May 1979 | GB |
WO 2007 146 871 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
French Search Report for FR1359014, mailed Jun. 25, 2014. |
International Search Report (English) for corresponding PCT/FR2014/051947, mailed Feb. 25, 2015. |
Written Opinion (French) for corresponding PCT/FR2014/051947 (with English translation),C3 mailed Feb. 25, 2015. |
French Search Report for related FR 1359018, dated Jul. 14, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related PCT/FR 2014/052196, dated Nov. 14, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160245460 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |