Gas tight shale shaker for enhanced drilling fluid recovery and drilled solids washing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12123268
  • Patent Number
    12,123,268
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 26, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 22, 2024
    17 days ago
Abstract
A gas tight shale shaker for enhanced drilling fluid recovery and drilled solids washing. A process and apparatus for liquid phase-solid phase separation of oil base drilling mud-containing drill cuttings is described including flowing the drilling mud-containing drill cuttings over a vibrating screen bed to cause a least a portion of the drilling mud to pass through the screen bed and the drill cuttings to remain on the screen bed. A diluent is added to the oil base drilling mud containing drill cuttings prior to flowing the drilling mud containing drill cutting over the screen bed. The entire process is performed in a gas-tight environment preventing escape of diluent from the process into the external atmosphere and preventing introduction of gases into the process from the external atmosphere.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The field of art to which this invention generally pertains is the liquid phase and solid phase separation and processing of drill cuttings.


BACKGROUND

During the drilling of a well, for example for gas or oil, drilling mud is typically pumped down the drill string through a drill bit. The drilling mud simultaneously cools the bit and carries drill cuttings up the well bore. Drilling mud is typically comprised of a fluid (or fluids), and mixture of additives which can be either fluids or solids, forming a useable drilling fluid. Oil base drilling fluids are often used to drill oil and gas wells because they have special characteristics that make them a better cooling/carrying fluid than other drilling muds. Additionally, such drilling muds may offer better wellbore stability and/or lubricity for the drill string in modern, horizontal wellbores.


Typically, the drill cuttings which are carried up the wellbore are subjected to solids separating devices when the cuttings exit the wellbore, such as that of shale shakers or decanter centrifuges. These mechanical separators allow a substantial portion of the drilling mud to be returned to the storage tanks for reuse, while the drill cuttings portion is sent to separate storage tanks. The drill cuttings still contain residual amounts of the drilling mud that couldn't be separated through conventional mechanical means, and this residual drilling mud is considered to be contamination.


The drill cuttings are commonly known as drilling waste, because they serve no purpose after they have been removed from the wellbore. Thus, the contaminated drill cuttings are typically stabilized with a bulking agent, such as fly-ash, sawdust, or liquid absorbing pellets, to prevent residual free liquids from leaching from the solids during transport. The cuttings are then typically transported to a secure landfill where they are stored for an indeterminate period of time, typically generations.


The recovered drilling fluids that have been subjected to solids separating devices, such as that of shale shakers or decanter centrifuges, still contain residual amounts of small micron sized solids, otherwise known as Low Gravity Solids or Ultra Fines.


The accumulation of Low Gravity Solids in an active drilling mud system is of significant concern to drilling well operators because they contribute to increased wear of high volume circulating equipment, they can cause the drill string to become differentially stuck in porous formations leading to expensive drilling downtime, and they contribute to reduced rates of drilling penetration, commonly known by those in the industry as the Rate of Penetration or ROP.


With the evolution of new drilling technologies such as horizontal drilling, shale oil or shale gas fracking, and the increasing cost of drilling fluids, the ability to, and benefits of, enhancing drilling fluid back to its new or original condition, would have clear benefits.


Accordingly, there is a constant search for new technologies and improvements to existing technologies to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of reclaiming processes.


BRIEF SUMMARY

A process for liquid phase-solid phase separation of oil base drilling mud-containing drill cuttings is described including flowing the drilling mud-containing drill cuttings over a vibrating screen bed to cause a least a portion of the drilling mud to pass through the screen bed and the drill cuttings to remain above the screen bed, wherein at least one diluent is added to the oil base drilling mud containing drill cuttings to enhance fluids recovery, the entire process being performed in a gas-tight environment preventing escape of diluent from the process into the external atmosphere and preventing introduction of air containing oxygen into the process from the external atmosphere.


Additional embodiments include: the process described above where diluent is added to the unstabilized drill cuttings at a rate sufficient to achieve a yield point of the liquids phase of the drill cuttings feed equal to or less than 0.75 Pa, prior to the unstabilized drill cuttings contacting the vibrating screen bed; the process described above where a spray bar with at least one hole or nozzle is used to evenly deliver diluent or diluents onto the unstabilized drill cuttings after the unstabilized drill cuttings have come in contact with the vibrating screen bed, at a rate sufficient to achieve or maintain a yield point of the liquids phase of the drill cuttings feed, equal to or less than 0.75 Pa; the process described above where the vibrating screen bed mixes the diluent and unstabilized drill cuttings; the process described above where the at least one diluent is added to the unstabilized drill cuttings at a rate sufficient to alter the plastic viscosity of the liquids phase of the drill cuttings feed to less than 5.0 cP, prior to the unstabilized drill cuttings contacting the vibrating screen bed; the process described above where a spray bar with at least on hole or nozzle is used to deliver the at least one diluent onto the unstabilized drill cuttings at a rate sufficient to alter the plastic viscosity of the liquids phase of the drill cuttings feed to less than 5.0 cP, after the unstabilized drill cuttings feed has come in contact with the vibrating screen bed; the process described above where the at least one diluent has a flashpoint less than or equal to 37° C.; the process described above where the mixture of oil base drilling mud-containing drill cuttings and at least one diluent has a flashpoint less than or equal to 37° C.; the process described above where the at least one diluent has a vapour pressure of at least 0.1 Torr and less than 750 Torr; the process described above where the diluent is hexane; the process described above where the diluent is n-butyl alcohol; the process described above where the diluent is ethyl acetate; the process described above where the environment within the gas tight process is maintained below the minimum oxygen content required for ignition of the diluent; the process described above where inert gas is introduced into the environment; the process described above where the inert gas comprises at least one of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or fuel gas; and the process described above where the inert gas exerts a positive pressure in the process.


An oil base drilling mud-drill cuttings liquid phase-solid phase separation apparatus is also described including a receptacle for receiving oil base drilling mud-drill cuttings slurries, in fluid flow communication with a vibrating screen bed for separating drilling mud from drill cuttings, in fluid flow communication with conduits for conveying away separated drilling mud and drill cuttings, wherein the apparatus additionally contains flanges and seals permitting a hermetically sealed gas exchange with other gas tight processes, into and out of the apparatus.


Additional embodiments include the apparatus described above in fluid flow communication with one or more of solvent wash apparatus, Verti-G dryers, decanters and solid dryers, through hermetically sealed conduits, bellows, hoses and/or conveyors; the apparatus described above where the separation apparatus additionally contains a receptacle inlet, an unstabilized drill cuttings storage device and/or feed hopper in fluid flow communication with the separation apparatus, including a hermetic seal between the unstabilized drill cuttings storage device and/or feed hopper, and the receptacle inlet; the apparatus described above where the hermetic sealing includes at least one of a rotary air lock, positive displacement feed pump, solids trap, and/or fluids trap, preventing the ingress of air containing oxygen.


These and additional embodiments are further described below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 demonstrates an embodiment of a conventional shale shaker used in the oil and gas drilling industry



FIG. 2 demonstrates how a slurry phase moves and transitions in a conventional shale shaker



FIG. 3 is a flow chart embodiment demonstrating a gas tight shale shaker as described herein combined with additional cuttings treatment systems, or fluid rehabilitation equipment



FIGS. 4a, 4b, 4c & 4d demonstrate an embodiment of a gas tight shale shaker as described herein, capable of diluent additions with the contaminated drill cuttings, while maintaining a safe process



FIGS. 5a & 5b demonstrate an embodiment of how the lower portion of a vibrating bed is sealed and how the egress of the liquids phase is facilitated through the sealed lower section.



FIG. 6 demonstrates an embodiment of a vacuum assist knock out tank and liquids phase transfer system



FIG. 7a demonstrates an embodiment of other processes that could be connected to a gas tight shale shaker and FIG. 7b shows the hopper and air lock system in a typical connected arrangement to the gas tight shale shaker, as described herein



FIGS. 8a, 8b and 8c are photos showing reductions of the free liquids phase using two diluent cuttings feed rates.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The particulars shown herein are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the various embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.


The present invention will now be described by reference to more detailed embodiments. This invention may, however, be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety.


Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should be construed in light of the number of significant digits and ordinary rounding approaches.


Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.


Additional advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.


Apparatus and methods to enhance the volume of oil base drilling fluid recovered from a gas tight shale shaker, prior to other types of solids management processes or fluids rehabilitation processes is described.


For ease of understanding, as typically used the terms “Oil base mud”, “Viscosity” and “Rheology” are provided as follows: oil base mud (OBM) is a drilling fluid system that uses oil as the base ingredient, as opposed to water, which is the base used in gel-chem mud systems, brine mud systems or polymer mud systems. Oil base mud is also known as Invert, and it typically consists of a mixture of oil, emulsified water and drilling mud additives. Viscosity is best understood as the thickness of a fluid. For example, water has relatively low viscosity, whereas a milkshake has a higher viscosity. Rheology, is the science explaining liquid flow including flow in “soft solids”. One of the important Rheology properties of OBM is the ‘yield point’, or the carrying capacity of the fluid. A small solid dropped in a glass of water demonstrates a fluid with no yield point, because the small solid will drop regardless of its size. The same size solid in a milkshake may not drop at all because the force of gravity may not be strong enough to break the yield strength of the milk shake. If it is heavy enough to break the yield point of the fluid it will drop more slowly than the same size solid in water due to the higher viscosity of the milk shake. As is the milk shake, invert is a non-Newtonian fluid and it is commonly modeled as a Bingham Plastic. Bingham Plastics behave like a solid, up to a particular amount of shear stress, when they behave like a liquid; this is known as the yield point of the fluid.


Typically, shale shakers (as known by those within the oil and gas drilling industry) consist of a vibratory screen bed. A slurry comprised of drilling mud and drilled solids is fed into a saddle tank upstream of the vibratory screen bed. The saddle tank includes an overflow weir that causes the slurry to spill evenly onto the vibratory screen bed, along its full width.


Shale shakers apply force, usually measured in terms of G-Force, ranging between four to eight times greater than earth's gravity. The principals behind a vibratory screen is to create a bed where the solids and liquids phase “bounce”, causing the liquids phase to yield under the stresses of the gravity and shaker forces. The yield point is the point where a thick liquids phase begins to transition from behaving like a solid, to acting as a liquid. Acting as a liquid provides an opportunity for the liquids phase to be thrown from the solids phase, and drop through the low micron screen of the vibratory bed. The liquids phase can then be returned directly to a processing tank, or be collected in an attached hopper or hose, and redirected to another process such as that of centrifuges, hydro cyclones, or membranes, for further fluids rehabilitation. Additional fluids rehabilitation is required because, while conventional shale shakers are a good mechanism to remove a substantial amount of liquids from the solids, the fluid typically contains low micron solids that travel through the porosity of the vibratory screen, rather than be caught on the upper side of the screen with the larger solids.



FIG. 1 is a representation of a typical shale shaker used on drilling rigs. A typical shale shaker consists of a basket (102) upon which screens (103) are secured by means of screen chocks (not shown), which is vibrated by vibratory motors (101) mounted on the side of, or top of the basket. Springs (104) facilitate vibration isolation between the vibrating basket section (102) and a rigid base section (108), which can sit freely on a floor or structure, or be permanently affixed to the floor or structure (not shown). While springs (104) are typically used for vibratory isolation of the basket section, air bags or rubber blocks can also be used.


The shale shaker is activated by turning on electric switches (107), thereby causing the vibratory screen bed to move in an elliptical or linear motion. A slurry is fed into the lower half of saddle tank (105) and once the saddle tank is full, the slurry spills over a weir (106) which is set to a level position to ensure the slurry spills evenly along the full width of the shaker screen(s) (103), thereby maximizing the effectiveness of the screening surface. The saddle tank (105) is sometimes called a possum.



FIG. 2 is an ‘X-ray’ view of the vibratory portion of a typical shale shaker, to show the flow direction of the slurry and its constituents. As the slurry enters the lower portion of the saddle tank (105), the flow (201) is directed upward, filling the saddle tank, until such time that the flow (202) breaches the weir (106) and spills evenly across the vibratory screen(s) (103). The slurry begins a phase separation wherein the (bouncing) solids phase (203) continues to travel across the first screen, or series of screens, while continuing to release more liquids, until such time that the solids contaminated with less liquids can spill over the end (205) of the vibratory screen bed (103). The recovered liquids phase (204) passes through the vibratory screen bed and spills into a process tank, or can redirected to conventional solids control equipment, such as that of desanders, desilters or centrifuges (not shown in the illustration).


Shale shakers are considered the first line of defense on a drilling rig, for recapturing drilling fluid that would otherwise be lost to the drill cuttings. They are a highly effective mechanism for bulk liquids recovery and very inexpensive when compared to other conventional forms of solids control, like that of centrifuges for example. While all shale shakers operate on the same basic principal, they do come in a variety of models, which offer differing gravitational forces, coarse to very fine screen sizes, differing vibratory motions, and as few as one screen, or as many as four, on one or more screen bed elevations.


In short, shale shakers were, and continue to be, the greatest advancement in bulk fluids recovery for the oil and gas drilling industry. However, while they do generally accomplish bulk fluids recovery, they do not necessarily accomplish effective fluids recovery. For example, it would be very typical that a drilling rig runs a pump rate of 1 to 2 cubic meters of drilling mud flow per minute. Cuttings production can vary throughout the drilling of a well, typically offering higher rates in the shallow sections of the well, while offering lower rates in deeper sections of the well. Table 1 has been included to illustrate the general effectiveness of fluids recovery using a typical conventional shale shaker. The table illustrates a likely outcome, when using a value for rate of penetration (ROP)/meters drilled per hour, and average mean for pump rates/cubic meters is multiplied by 1000 litres per minute, an average drill cuttings production value on a given well bore size, and an oil on cuttings (OOC's) value of 35%. In these circumstances, of the total pumped volume per hour, less than 1% (by volume) is lost to the drill cuttings, and greater than 99% (by volume) is recovered.














TABLE 1





Likely


Cuttings
OOC's
Estimated


ROP
Pump Rate
Hole Size
Production
(@ 35% ‘wet’)
Efficiency







10 m/hr
1.1 m3/minute (~66 m3/hr)
159 mm (6¼″)
 0.3 m3/hr
 ~100 litres per hour
99.85%


25 m/hr
1.1 m3/minute (~66 m3/hr)
159 mm (6¼″)
0.75 m3/hr
 ~260 litres per hour
 99.6%


25 m/hr
2.2 m3/minute (~132 m3/hr)
222 mm (8¾″)
 1.5 m3/hr
 ~525 litres per hour
 99.6%


50 m/hr
2.2 m3/minute (~132 m3/hr)
222 mm (8¾″)
  3 m3/hr
~1050 litres per hour
99.25%









However, while Table 1 illustrates that the general efficiency of shale shakers is very good, the drilling fluid lost to the drill cuttings over the course of a well is still substantial, due to the large number of pumping hours required for each well.


In recent years, certain advancements have been made to make shale shakers more effective. For example, Canadian Patent Nos. 2,741955; 2,712,774 and 2,799,405 collaboratively describe processes where the underside of at least one portion of the vibratory shaker bed is sealed with one or more funnel shaped coverings, while negative and/or positive air pressure is applied to further enhance the movement of recoverable drilling fluids, air flow is cycled to prohibit blinding of the screens, and/or mist eliminators are employed. The air flow differential causes a sucking or pushing action on at least a portion of one vibratory screen thereby making a dryer drill cutting than would otherwise be possible with a conventional shale shaker.


Despite the operational drawbacks of the above design, for example, high noise levels due to the vacuum pump, higher low gravity solids due to reduced additions of new OBM, and significantly higher power consumption due to the vacuum pump, the design offers higher OBM recovery rates than conventional shale shakers. Because this design is not gas tight, any introduction of a flammable diluent could be catastrophic to workers or process equipment if a spark were introduced or generated.


With the advent of ever increasing environmental standards, and the desire to remediate drilled solids, and the desire to recover more OBM, there is a need for more effective means of fluids recovery equipment. One example of a solvent wash process is described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,820,438, where a solvent washing process is employed to dissolve the oil on cuttings, and the clean cuttings are then moved to a drying process for solvent recovery. The recovered OBM and solvent are sent for additional fluids rehabilitation such as gravity separation or filtration, and finally distillation for solvent recovery.


Another example is the use of a Vertical Cuttings Dryer, also known as a Verti-G Dryer. Verti-G dryers use centrifugal force to break the yield stress of the liquids phase and throw it through a screen. The solids are conveyed along the screen to cause the drill cuttings to eventually drop off of the conical screen, and be conveyed away from the Verti-G dryer. The recovered fluids are polluted with low gravity solids and in need of substantial fluids rehabilitation.


Good results can be obtained from both Verti-G Dryers and solvent wash processes, when the feed stock of unstabilized drill cuttings is predictably stable. For example, a volume of unstabilized drill cuttings which is consistent and not too wet (excess OBM), and not to dry, (lacking OBM), will mitigate process upsets caused when the oil wet cuttings feed changes from dryer to wetter, or wetter to dryer, for example. Further, the addition of a diluent will help a Verti-G Dryer or Solvent Wash Process because the diluent is added to alter rheology, thereby allowing OBM to be removed more effectively within enhanced gas tight solids control equipment.


Thus is the need for an improved method to remove a substantial portion of the oil on cuttings. FIG. 3 is an illustrative flow chart demonstrating where such an embodiment could be located, relative to other processes.


As described herein, a low gravity solids/liquids separation device is used to separate the components of a slurry into a first solids phase with a lower liquids content, and a second liquids phase with a lower solids content. Specifically, a conventional vibratory screen bed, commonly known as a shale shaker by those in the oil and gas industry, modified as described herein, can be used. To increase the efficiency of the separation of the liquids and solids phase, a diluent (or diluents) is added to the process and the apparatus is sealed to prevent volatiles from escaping the gas tight design, which could cause irreparable harm to additional processes or operators within the area, thereby creating a solids phase and liquids phase that are better defined and manageable in other processes as further demonstrated below.


The addition of a diluent has shown to increase the effectiveness of a shale shaker during field testing. For example, an M-I SWACO MONGOOSE™ shale shaker was used to test the effectiveness of adding a diluent to unstabilized OBM drill cuttings, prior to being passed over the shale shaker. Unstabilized OBM drill cuttings were obtained from a drilling rig, wherein the drill cuttings had been subjected to a conventional shale shaker (model unknown) wherein as much of the OBM had been removed as was possible, and the solids phase (containing some liquids) was collected in a storage tank for transportation to the test facility. No bulking agents were added to the drill cuttings prior to, or during transport. The drill cuttings were unloaded at the test facility and a retort completed to determine the volume of OBM, compared to drill cuttings. A retort is a representative sample that is placed in a small cylinder and heated to 500° C. so that all liquids boil out of the sample. The liquids are forced out of the cylinder where they recondense in a cooler, and drip into a test tube for measurement. The results of the retort confirmed that the sample contained 31% liquids by volume.


Hexane was used as a diluent during the test, which was conducted at two different conveyance rates of drill cuttings, to a fixed volume of diluent. The first test included a diluent pump rate 480 litres per hour, to an auger rate of 500 litres of drill cuttings per hour. The diluent was introduced to the cuttings feed auger about 4 meters before the slurry reached the vibratory bed of the shaker, allowing for about 2 minutes of contact/mixing time. About 15 minutes into the test, three samples were obtained at two minute intervals and stored in sample jars marked as Samples 1, 2 & 3. Following the third sample collection, the drill cuttings feed auger speed was increased for a smooth transition to the second test. The second test included a diluent pump rate 480 litres per hour, to an auger rate of 1000 litres of drill cuttings per hour. As in the first test, three samples were obtained at two minute intervals and stored in sample jars labelled as Samples 4, 5 & 6.


During the two tests, visual observations were made of the ‘wet’ cuttings feed and ‘dry’ shaker bed overflow and there was an obvious improvement in the free liquids phase reductions at both diluent/cuttings feed rates. See, for example, FIGS. 8a, 8b & 8c, where 8a demonstrates wet cuttings feed as received, 8b dry shale shaker overflow (Sample 3), and 8c dry shale shaker overflow (Sample 6).


Retorts were conducted on the six samples and the results of the tests are shown in Table 2.











TABLE 2





Retort Identification (Retort consisted of a standard retort
Liquids phase
Solids phase*


tester, common to the oil and gas industry - 10 ml model)
(by volume %)
(by volume %)







Unstabilized OBM drill cuttings (as received)
  31%
  69%


Sample 1 (480 litres/hr diluent: 500 litres/hr cuttings)
  16%
  84%


Sample 2 (480 litres/hr diluent: 500 litres/hr cuttings)
  16%
  84%


Sample 3 (480 litres/hr diluent: 500 litres/hr cuttings)
  16%
  84%


Sample 4 (480 litres/hr diluent: 1000 litres/hr cuttings)
<18%
>82%


Sample 5 (480 litres/hr diluent: 1000 litres/hr cuttings)
  16%
  84%


Sample 6 (480 litres/hr diluent: 1000 litres/hr cuttings)
  16%
  84%





*The solids phase (vol %) is inferred; a retort is a measure of volume and as such, the volume at the start of the test is 100% of the cylinder volume; post testing, the solids phase is inferred by calculating 100%, minus the liquids phase actually measured






The results show that despite being previously subjected to a conventional shale shaker at the drilling rig, the additions of a diluent facilitated the removal of additional OBM, reducing the liquids phase portion of the first sample by almost 50% to approximately 16% (by volume), compared to 31% (by volume). The second and third samples yield the same results as the first sample, showing a consistent trend during testing. In review, the second test was a repeat of the first test, only changing the volume of cuttings feed to the fixed diluent feed rate. While the results of Sample 4 suggested a leaner mixture of diluent to cuttings feed would yield a ‘wetter’ cuttings carryover, Samples 5 & 6 returned to the same liquids phase reductions as that of Samples 1, 2 & 3. In view of the obvious value of the diluent, it is captured and reclaimed as well.


While similar to a conventional shale shaker, FIGS. 4a, 4b and 4c are representations of a gas tight shale shaker, capable of separating a liquids phase from a solids phase when a diluent is added to the slurry feed, potentially creating a flammable slurry. The gas tight shale shaker design consists of a basket (402) upon which fine screens (403) are mounted to, which is vibrated by vibratory motors (409) mounted on the side of (illustrated), or top of (not shown) the basket. Springs (404) facilitate vibration isolation between the vibrating basket section (402) and a rigid base section (408), which can sit freely on a floor or structure, or be permanently affixed to the floor or structure (not shown in the illustration). While springs (404) are typically used for vibratory isolation of the basket section, air bags or rubber blocks can also be used.


The basket (402) of a gas tight shale shaker includes a flange (401) which goes around the top inner or outer edge of the basket (as well as the wall sections for rigidity), so that lid sections (405) can be placed over the shaker bed basket section to ensure oxygen cannot enter the process, and the inner atmosphere cannot escape the process. FIG. 4d shows the embodiment of a lid section, which can be constructed of a rigid metal cover, composite materials, or a translucent cover such as that of shatter proof glass, LEXAN™ polymer or acrylic (405). The use of a translucent cover is preferred because it offers the user the ability to view the process while maintaining a gas tight environment. A gasket (413) made of conventional rubber or conventional silicone material suitable for sealing against volatile organic solvents is also added to the underside of the lid sections, prior to bolts with washers and nuts (414) being inserted through the (top) flange (406), and lower flange (401) (which is by extension, part of the basket), added to give the basket the necessary rigidity and strength required for continuous vibration. The upper and lower flange ‘sandwich’ the lid section in place and help to mitigate stress cracking of the lid section, which can occur because of the vibratory action of the basket (402). While an upper and lower flange can mitigate stress cracking of the gas tight covers, lightweight materials of construction can cause a loud ‘drumming’ effect, which is obviously undesirable for workers that may be present in the immediate area. As such, any materials of construction selected should be done with rigidity and long-life integrity in mind. The oxygen content in the system can be measured and monitored, and is preferably kept below the minimum oxygen level required for ignition of the diluent(s) in use, which can vary from one diluent to another, or in the case of a mixture of diluents.


In an effort to ensure transient oxygen does not enter the process through the inlet feed of unstabilized drill cuttings, as demonstrated in FIG. 7b, the drilling waste (a mixture of oil base drilling fluid and drill cuttings) is received and stored until the facility is ready to process the waste. The unstabilized drill cuttings are loaded (706) into a hopper (707) which maintains a minimum volume (712) over the feed auger (710), a fluid leg that prohibits the entry of unwanted air to the process, or the escape of a volatile diluent to the atmosphere. The safe minimum level of unstabilized drill cuttings in the hopper can be controlled either by means of a weight indicator on the hopper (not shown) or overhead level transducer (not shown), or by operator observation. The process feed rate is controlled by a gear reduction motor (713) coupled to the feed auger (710) with a solids/fluids trap (714), or a rotary air lock (not shown), or a positive displacement feed pump (not shown), preventing the ingress of air containing oxygen, which allows conveyance of the solids to occur at a controlled and measured rate, also known as characterization of the flow. Given the need for vibration isolation between the shaker basket (402) and the feed auger, a flexible conduit or bellows (711) must be installed between flange/coupling/fitting (410) connected to the shaker basket (402) and the flange/coupling/fitting (709) of the feed auger (710).


Diluent is added (708) to the unstabilized drill cuttings feed auger (710) to allow the less viscous diluent to mix with the cuttings feed, thereby causing the OBM liquid in the wet cuttings feed to have a lower yield point, or to eliminate the yield strength entirely, and lowering the viscosity of the liquid, and facilitating separation of the liquids phase and solids phase when they are subjected to gravitational or centripetal forces to settle and separate the solids from the liquid. The rate of diluent additions is sufficient to eliminate or significantly reduce the yield point and to reduce the (plastic) viscosity of the liquids phase in the unstabilized drill cuttings feed. The length of the conveyor between the hopper and the inlet of the shale shaker is of less importance to the embodiment except that the length must be long enough to ensure there is adequate mixing of the diluent and unstabilized drill cuttings during the term of conveyance. The volume of diluent added to unstabilized drill cuttings would be approximately 1:1, with a minimum ratio being 1:5, and a maximum ratio being 5:1. The “ideal ratio” of diluent to unstabilized drill cuttings could be influenced by capital cost of the equipment, operating costs for the facility, and throughput versus maximizing drilling fluid recovery. Table 3 has been included to show the expected yield point (represented in Pascal's) and predicted resulting plastic viscosity (represented in Centipoise) of a mixture of diluent and unstabilized drill cuttings, at various ratios. For the purposes of obtaining representative data for Table 3, hexane was mixed with oil base drilling mud to determine the rheological changes, and the data was used to build the predicted Plastic Viscosity (PV represented in centipoise cP)/Yield Point (YP represented in pascals Pa) table below.












TABLE 3





Ratio of diluent

Resulting
Resulting


to unstabilized

PV
YP


drill cuttings
Temperature
(cP)
(Pa)


















  0:1
50° C.
25
4.5


  0:1
 0° C.
89
12


0.1:1
 0° C.
~4.9
~1.3


0.5:1
 0° C.
<1.0
<1.0


  1:1
 0° C.
~0.5
~0.5


1.5:1
 0° C.
~0.5
<0.5









An inert gas is also required to ensure there is a lack of oxygen in the gas tight environment. Typically, nitrogen or carbon dioxide are used to purge the oxygen out of the gas tight environment, prior to any equipment or processes using the otherwise flammable diluent. The inert gas atmosphere can be shared with other processes, such as that of a gas tight decanter, solvent wash tanks, or solids drying equipment, for example.


Prior to the feed of the drill cuttings being delivered to the gas tight shale shaker, a diluent or diluents are added to the unstabilized drill cuttings. The diluent must be chosen for its specific characteristics, bur for the purposes of this invention, generally diluents with a vapor pressure (corrected to a gauge pressure at 20° C.) of at least 0.1 Torr and less than 750 Torr, and further having a flash point of less than 37° C. will quickly dissolve into solution with the oil in the OBM and lower or eliminate the yield strength and lower the viscosity (for example, hexane, n-butyl alcohol, ethyl acetate, etc.). The diluent must be added prior to the drill cuttings being fed into the gas tight shale shaker to allow the less viscus diluent to mix with the cuttings feed, thereby causing the liquids phase of the cuttings feed to have a lower yield point than OBM alone, and facilitating greater separation of the liquids phase and solids phase when the two are in contact with the vibratory shaker bed.


Alternatively, or in conjunction with diluent being added to the unstabilized drill cuttings before the slurry comes in contact with the vibratory shaker bed, the diluent can be added once the feed is on the vibratory shaker bed. Incorporating a spray bar with one or more nozzles (416) above the vibratory shaker bed (over the first shaker screen) and within the gas tight enclosure would permit the diluent (417) to become mixed with the unstabilized drill cuttings feed by using the gravitational forces of the shaker bed itself. In the case of the mixture of diluent and unstabilized drill cuttings being mixed with the feed auger, the liquids phase would immediately begin leaving the solids phase on the vibratory bed because the lower yield point of the liquids phase would facilitate greater separation. Thus, diluent pumped to a connection on the outside of the vibratory bed (415) would permit the diluent to enter the gas tight enclosure and exit the spray bar through the holes and/or nozzles (416) over the middle or second half of the shaker screen(s), effectively being applied as a rinse (or double wash) to the already partially cleaned drill cuttings thereby facilitating a lower amount of residual oil on cuttings (because the ‘rinse’ diluent is being added to pre-cleaned cuttings thereby decreasing the residual oil phase and increasing the ratio of solvent to residual oil).


The gas tight shale shaker is activated by turning on electric switches (412), thereby activating the vibratory screen bed. A slurry of drill cuttings and diluent is fed into the basket section (402) through a flexible conduit or hose which connects via a flange (410) or aero-union. The slurry of drill cuttings and diluent spills onto the screen bed (403), or alternatively, onto a spill plate (not shown), mounted just below the inlet flange (410) and above the shaker screens (403) to ensure the slurry has an opportunity to spill evenly along the full width of the shaker screen(s) (403), thereby maximizing the effectiveness of the screening surface.


Once the drill cuttings have been subjected to the higher gravitational vibrations of the screen bed, the cuttings containing less OBM contamination fall off the end of the vibratory bed into the discharge chute (411) and downward through the flexible conduit or hose (407) and are conveyed by screw auger to (or fall directly into) additional processes that can include for example, one or more from the following list (and supporting description):

    • solvent wash equipment; see, for example, a solids washing process as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,820,438, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, where a solvent washing process is employed to dissolve the oil on cuttings, by introducing the unstabilized drill cuttings into an inclined auger tank filled with solvent as the wash medium.
    • gas tight Verti-G dryers; see, for example, commonly owned U.S. Patent Application, Ser. No. 62/303,172, entitled Diluent Treated Drilling Waste Material Recovery Process And System filed of even date herewith, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
    • solids dryers; see, for example, a typical solids drying process to remove the residual diluent as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 8,820,438, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, where heat transfer fluid is pumped through both the jacket of the dryer and the auger flighting to maximize the heat transfer area.


The liquids phase consisting of OBM, low gravity solids, diluent (and in some cases free water) falls downward through the vibrating screen bed (403) where it drips through a lower opening into a funnel shaped sealed section (503) below the screen bed, as shown in FIG. 5a. The liquids phase accumulates into the lowest point of the lower sealed cover and flow from the cover through an opening or outlet (502) that is connected to a flexible conduit or hose (602) where the recovered fluids can be sent for additional fluids rehabilitation.



FIG. 7a shows an embodiment of a gravity drainage tank (703) wherein the liquids phase can simply drain to a sealed storage tank for temporary storage prior to being evacuated by means of a pump (704) which is connected to the temporary storage tank. The pump pulls the stored slurry from the knock out tank (703) through a suction pipe (706), and conveys the stored liquids phase through a pump outlet (707) to another process, such as that of a gas tight decanter, see, for example, commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/212,754, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, or filtration equipment, clarifier tanks, molecular separation by membrane or distillation equipment. Given the liquids phase includes a diluent, the low gravity solids phase is susceptible to premature settling, so a paddle mixer (705) or other tank stirring system could be employed to ensure the low gravity solids and liquids phase remain uniformly suspended until they are sent for rehabilitation.


Alternatively, FIG. 5b shows a design wherein each shaker screen can have an independent cover (505) (507) (509) and independent connection points (504) (506) (508) which are connected to separate gravity fed collection tanks (703) or separate vacuum assist knock out tanks (601), or combination thereof. FIG. 6 shows an embodiment for a vacuum knock out tank (601) which is attached to the shaker connection points (502) (504) (506) (508) via a flexible conduit or hose (602) to ensure the vibratory action of the shaker basket (501) is not passed through the hose to the knock out tank. A vacuum is applied to the knock out tank via a rigid riser (603) located on the top of the knock out tank. The riser is connected to the vacuum pump (607), which is most typically powered by an electric motor (608) that can be controlled by a variable frequency drive to ensure the negative air pressure on the shaker screens from time to time is either intermittent so that solids are released from the vibratory screens, or the air velocity is slowed to ensure the solids phase do not become stuck on the vibratory screen bed. At least a portion of the atmosphere in the gas tight shaker moves with the liquids phase from the upper side of the shaker screens, through the shaker screens into the knock out tank where the liquids phase is retained and the atmosphere is permitted to continue through the vacuum pump where it exits the vacuum pump through the return exhaust (609) and back to the slurry inlet of the shale shaker (410) or solids outlet of the shale shaker (407), or into a separate atmosphere communication port (not shown) via a flexible hose or conduit (not shown), so that the inert atmosphere is continually replenished and transient oxygen is not introduced. The mixture of OBM, diluent and low gravity solids will be susceptible to solids settling so every effort is made to ensure the slurry is pulled from the knockout tank via a suction pipe (604), into the pump (605) where some of the pump discharge (606) is circulated back to the knock out tank to ensure the liquids and low gravity solids remain in uniform suspension.


Alternatively, FIG. 7a shows an embodiment of a gravity drainage tank (703) wherein the liquids phase can simply drain to a sealed storage tank for temporary storage prior to being evacuated by means of a pump (704) which is connected to the temporary storage tank. The pump pulls the stored slurry from the knock out tank (703) through a suction pipe (706), and conveys the stored liquids phase through a pump outlet (707) to another process, such as that of a gas tight decanter, see, for example, commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/212,754, entitled Gas Tight Shale Shaker For Enhanced Drilling Fluid Recovery And Drilled Solids Washing the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, or filtration equipment, clarifier tanks, molecular separation by membrane or distillation equipment. Given the liquids phase includes a diluent, the low gravity solids phase is susceptible to premature settling, so a paddle mixer (705) or other tank stirring system could be employed to ensure the low gravity solids and liquids phase remain uniformly suspended until they are sent for rehabilitation.


The gas tight design has the added benefit of automatically de-misting by design, in that the entire process ensures vapours recirculate in a closed loop, eliminating fluid loss due to misting.


Thus, the scope of the invention shall include all modifications and variations that may fall within the scope of the attached claims. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for separating drilling-mud cuttings from an oil base drilling fluid comprising: a receptacle for receiving a slurry of drilling-mud cuttings and oil base drilling fluid, the receptacle having a receptacle outlet;a gas-tight shale-shaker including: an elongate, rectangular vibrating basket with a screen bed defining a bottom surface of the vibrating basket, an inlet end sidewall and two elongate sidewalls extending from the inlet end sidewall above and along said screen bed defining an interior volume, each of the upper ends of the inlet end sidewall and two elongate sidewalls having flanged surfaces, the vibrating basket having an open outlet end opposite the inlet end;a shaker inlet extending through the inlet end sidewall for introducing the slurry into the interior volume to be separated;a discharge chute having an open upper end spanning the width of the screen bed, the discharge chute having perimeter walls with upper flanged surfaces, the discharge chute being positioned at the open outlet end to receive separated cuttings as they are vibrated off the screen bed through the open outlet end;a solids outlet extending through a lower portion of the discharge chute permitting separated cuttings to exit the interior volume of the vibrating basket;a lower sealed section attached to the bottom of the vibrating basket enclosing a fluid collection volume for receiving drilling fluid that has passed through the screen bed;a drilling fluid outlet extending through the lower sealed section, permitting drilling fluid which has passed through the screen bed to exit the vibrating basket;a plurality of lid sections covering the interior volume and the open upper end of the discharge chute;a gasket being sealingly sandwiched between the plurality of lid sections and the flanged surfaces of each of the upper ends of the inlet end sidewall, the two elongate sidewalls and the upper flanged surfaces of the discharge chute perimeter walls, such that a gas-tight seal is formed between the interior volume and an environment external thereto; anda vibration mechanism operably coupled to the vibrating basket for vibrating the basket;wherein the receptacle outlet is in fluid communication with the shaker inlet in a gas-tight manner for introducing slurry into the gas-tight shale-shaker.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the receptacle comprises a hopper.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the hopper is fluidically coupled to the shaker inlet in a gas-tight manner with a feed auger.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the feed auger includes a diluent inlet.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein flexible conduits or bellows are connected to the shaker inlet and/or the solids outlet and/or a drilling fluid outlet to provide for gas-tight fluid connection and/or vibration isolation with respect to the shaker basket.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein, the gasket comprises a rubber or silicone material.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein, at least one of the plurality of lid sections is constructed of a rigid metal material, a composite material, a translucent material or shatter proof glass.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein, at least one of the plurality of lid sections is constructed of a polymer or acrylic.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, further comprising a diluent spray bar extending through the interior volume, the diluent spray bar having one or more nozzles arranged above the screen bed and operable to spray diluent.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, further comprising one or more of a solvent wash apparatus, vertical cuttings dryers, decanters and solid dryers as downstream gas tight processes.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/447,971, filed Mar. 2, 2017, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/303,169 filed Mar. 3, 2016, the disclosures of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. This application is also related to commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 62/212,754 entitled Gas-tight Centrifuge for VOC Separation filed on Sep. 1, 2015, Ser. No. 62/303,163 entitled Gas Tight Horizontal Decanter For Drilling Waste Solids Washing filed Mar. 3, 2016, and Ser. No. 62/303,172 entitled Diluent Treated Drilling Waste Material Recovery Process And System filed Mar. 3, 2016, the disclosures of all three which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (546)
Number Name Date Kind
1774044 Sweetland Aug 1930 A
2089548 Frantz Aug 1937 A
2183896 Rupp Dec 1939 A
2246483 Dillon Jun 1941 A
2312477 Pollitz Mar 1943 A
2329333 Carter Sep 1943 A
2462878 Logue Mar 1949 A
2683533 Paul Jul 1954 A
2736434 Yacoe Feb 1956 A
3228592 Shapiro Jan 1966 A
3452868 Miller Jul 1969 A
3497063 Hirs Feb 1970 A
3559807 Reilly Feb 1971 A
3570670 Endo Mar 1971 A
3616904 Aremaa Nov 1971 A
3662886 Kennedy, Jr. May 1972 A
3766997 Heilhecker Oct 1973 A
3773661 Talley Nov 1973 A
3777405 Crawford Dec 1973 A
3796317 Lippert Mar 1974 A
3852197 Thompson Dec 1974 A
3899426 Hirs Aug 1975 A
3929642 Ennis Dec 1975 A
3970552 Bongert Jul 1976 A
4033873 Stoltenberg Jul 1977 A
4043047 Galliker Aug 1977 A
4116288 Love Sep 1978 A
4120447 Jäger Oct 1978 A
4147635 Crowe Apr 1979 A
4192743 Bastgen Mar 1980 A
4209381 Kelly, Jr. Jun 1980 A
4234416 Lower Nov 1980 A
4247312 Thakur Jan 1981 A
4306974 Harry Dec 1981 A
4350591 Lee Sep 1982 A
4397659 Gowan Aug 1983 A
4402834 Bastgen Sep 1983 A
4430231 Bratten Feb 1984 A
4446022 Harry May 1984 A
4457839 Bailey Jul 1984 A
4459207 Young Jul 1984 A
4477358 Heintges Oct 1984 A
4482459 Shiver Nov 1984 A
4495065 DeReamer Jan 1985 A
4567673 Bohnensieker Feb 1986 A
4568460 Bratten Feb 1986 A
4576713 Melin Mar 1986 A
4634535 Lott Jan 1987 A
4636308 Summers Jan 1987 A
4639258 Schellstede Jan 1987 A
4664813 Schneider May 1987 A
4666471 Cates May 1987 A
4722793 Seifert Feb 1988 A
4747961 Beer May 1988 A
4750920 Manuel Jun 1988 A
4756092 Anderson Jul 1988 A
4802591 Lower Feb 1989 A
4827853 Emery May 1989 A
4882054 Derrick Nov 1989 A
4886608 Cook Dec 1989 A
4911834 Murphy Mar 1990 A
4921608 Lee May 1990 A
4944873 Williams Jul 1990 A
4956088 Hindstrom Sep 1990 A
4962592 Orizand Oct 1990 A
5091079 Gayman Feb 1992 A
5093001 Ueda Mar 1992 A
5098586 Rudolph Mar 1992 A
5156749 Williams Oct 1992 A
5173272 Roland Dec 1992 A
5183086 Fanta Feb 1993 A
5190645 Burgess Mar 1993 A
5209841 Bratten May 1993 A
5232099 Maynard Aug 1993 A
5233763 Minnie, Jr. Aug 1993 A
5246574 Jorgens Sep 1993 A
5256290 Becker Oct 1993 A
5308487 Thissen May 1994 A
5341939 Aitchison Aug 1994 A
5344570 McLachlan Sep 1994 A
5357881 Elcik Oct 1994 A
5366626 Pierson Nov 1994 A
5382327 Seifert Jan 1995 A
5392925 Seyffert Feb 1995 A
5454957 Roff, Jr. Oct 1995 A
5462673 Piers Oct 1995 A
5462677 Benesi Oct 1995 A
5470473 Park Nov 1995 A
5482594 Salminen Jan 1996 A
5507858 Jepson Apr 1996 A
5527458 Gehrmann Jun 1996 A
5540846 Koch Jul 1996 A
5570749 Reed Nov 1996 A
5582271 Mielo Dec 1996 A
5582727 Foster Dec 1996 A
5593582 Roff, Jr. Jan 1997 A
5603846 Uchiyama Feb 1997 A
5614094 Deister Mar 1997 A
5641070 Seyffert Jun 1997 A
5643468 Ure Jul 1997 A
5656179 Gehrmann Aug 1997 A
5707512 Koch Jan 1998 A
5707535 Harris Jan 1998 A
5804081 DeGesero Sep 1998 A
5813138 Barabe Sep 1998 A
5814230 Willis Sep 1998 A
5840187 Derenthal Nov 1998 A
5853583 Shah Dec 1998 A
5862612 Bielfeldt Jan 1999 A
5919358 Williams Jul 1999 A
5996484 Reddoch Dec 1999 A
6004461 Harris Dec 1999 A
6073709 Hensley Jun 2000 A
6106733 Wood Aug 2000 A
6110367 Jensen Aug 2000 A
6155428 Bailey Dec 2000 A
6193070 Rowney Feb 2001 B1
6213227 Dietzen Apr 2001 B1
6237780 Schulte May 2001 B1
6279471 Reddoch Aug 2001 B1
6315813 Morgan Nov 2001 B1
6321860 Reddoch Nov 2001 B1
6322693 Southall Nov 2001 B1
6352159 Loshe Mar 2002 B1
6371301 Schulte Apr 2002 B1
6371306 Adams Apr 2002 B2
6409929 Bott Jun 2002 B2
6412644 Crabbe Jul 2002 B1
6413297 Morgan Jul 2002 B1
6432299 Hensley Aug 2002 B1
6461523 Greenrose Oct 2002 B1
6506310 Kulbeth Jan 2003 B2
6510947 Schulte Jan 2003 B1
6530438 McIntyre Mar 2003 B1
6530482 Wiseman Mar 2003 B1
6533946 Pullman Mar 2003 B2
6550552 Pappa et al. Apr 2003 B1
6620221 Lenzing Sep 2003 B1
6622870 Prinssen Sep 2003 B1
6679385 Suter Jan 2004 B2
6681874 Risher Jan 2004 B2
6711830 Hensley Mar 2004 B2
6715611 Crabbe Apr 2004 B2
6769550 Adams Aug 2004 B2
6797185 Lisa Sep 2004 B2
6808626 Kulbeth Oct 2004 B2
6823238 Hensley Nov 2004 B1
6846421 Bratten Jan 2005 B2
6848583 Largent Feb 2005 B2
6855261 Boutte Feb 2005 B2
6863183 Schulte Mar 2005 B2
6868972 Seyffert Mar 2005 B2
6892887 Rayborn May 2005 B2
6932169 Wylie Aug 2005 B2
6953097 Seyffert Oct 2005 B2
7028414 Vonplon Apr 2006 B2
7029579 Tapp Apr 2006 B2
7040488 Seyffert May 2006 B2
7093678 Risher Aug 2006 B2
7111739 Tsutsumi Sep 2006 B2
7175027 Strong Feb 2007 B2
7195084 Burnett Mar 2007 B2
7198156 Schulte Apr 2007 B2
7216767 Schulte May 2007 B2
7243741 Swartout Jul 2007 B2
7278540 Stone Oct 2007 B2
7306057 Strong Dec 2007 B2
7331469 Padalino Feb 2008 B2
7380673 Fout Jun 2008 B2
7381329 Moss Jun 2008 B1
7514011 Kulbeth Apr 2009 B2
7568535 Larson Aug 2009 B2
7571817 Scott Aug 2009 B2
7575073 Swartout Aug 2009 B2
7575657 Lampinen Aug 2009 B2
7581647 Grichar Sep 2009 B2
7651619 Hansen Jan 2010 B2
7703612 Browne Apr 2010 B2
7753214 Tomlinson Jul 2010 B2
7815808 Benesi Oct 2010 B2
7874082 Saarela Jan 2011 B2
7896162 Bailey Mar 2011 B2
7980392 Larson Jul 2011 B2
8025152 Vasshus Sep 2011 B2
8113356 Burnett Feb 2012 B2
8118172 Burnett Feb 2012 B2
8123046 Billeaud Feb 2012 B2
8132632 Scott Mar 2012 B2
8201693 Jan Jun 2012 B2
8231010 Scott Jul 2012 B2
8282838 Billeaud Oct 2012 B2
8287441 Wick Oct 2012 B2
8302780 Mitchell Nov 2012 B1
8313077 Rose Nov 2012 B2
8316557 Burnett Nov 2012 B2
8394270 Vasshus Mar 2013 B2
8418856 Bailey Apr 2013 B2
8453844 Bailey Jun 2013 B2
8533974 Burnett Sep 2013 B2
8556083 Burnett Oct 2013 B2
8561805 Scott Oct 2013 B2
8562816 Paille, Jr. Oct 2013 B1
8613360 Carr Dec 2013 B2
8622220 Schulte, Jr. Jan 2014 B2
8641811 Mathena Feb 2014 B2
8668634 Wick Mar 2014 B2
8695809 Sherwood Apr 2014 B2
8746459 Scott Jun 2014 B2
8746460 Vasshus Jun 2014 B2
8807343 Bailey Aug 2014 B2
8812236 Freeman Aug 2014 B1
8820438 Ross et al. Sep 2014 B2
8844650 Saiz Sep 2014 B2
8869986 Bailey Oct 2014 B2
8956543 Carr Feb 2015 B2
8984763 Savarese Mar 2015 B2
9004288 Carr Apr 2015 B2
9015959 Pomerleau Apr 2015 B2
9023275 McClung, III May 2015 B2
9068777 Savarese Jun 2015 B2
9073104 Burnett Jul 2015 B2
9074440 Carr Jul 2015 B2
9079188 Culver Jul 2015 B2
9079222 Burnett Jul 2015 B2
9114340 Smith Aug 2015 B2
9199278 Scott Dec 2015 B2
9289805 Bagnoli Mar 2016 B2
9334699 Bender May 2016 B2
9352264 Halk May 2016 B2
9359840 Pomerleau Jun 2016 B2
9364777 Burnett Jun 2016 B2
9387517 Carr Jul 2016 B2
9399896 Vasshus Jul 2016 B2
9500052 Ross Nov 2016 B2
9512687 Carr Dec 2016 B2
9617811 Thiessen Apr 2017 B2
9643115 Convery May 2017 B2
9662599 Sewell May 2017 B2
9677353 Burnett Jun 2017 B2
9687761 Thompson Jun 2017 B2
9718008 Peresan Aug 2017 B2
9752399 Timmerman Sep 2017 B2
9795903 Vickers Oct 2017 B2
9815005 Burnett Nov 2017 B2
9828258 Kubala Nov 2017 B2
RE46632 Saiz Dec 2017 E
9840882 Bailey Dec 2017 B2
9896012 Steger Feb 2018 B2
9915112 Geehan Mar 2018 B2
9937530 Holton Apr 2018 B2
9957762 Marshall May 2018 B2
10001464 Kronenberger Jun 2018 B2
10029195 Strain Jul 2018 B2
10029203 Riggs Jul 2018 B2
10047577 Bailey Aug 2018 B2
10081994 Imler Sep 2018 B2
10094183 Carr Oct 2018 B2
10167689 Jones Jan 2019 B2
10226720 Vasshus Mar 2019 B2
10233707 Li Mar 2019 B2
10238994 Ross Mar 2019 B2
10240412 Tooley Mar 2019 B2
10328364 Ross Jun 2019 B2
10335720 Pomerleau Jul 2019 B2
10350520 Cady Jul 2019 B2
10363580 Bingham Jul 2019 B2
10399017 Sewell Sep 2019 B2
10434442 Peresan Oct 2019 B2
10443327 Frazier Oct 2019 B2
10487600 Culver Nov 2019 B2
10493383 Teodorescu Dec 2019 B2
10532381 Stewart Jan 2020 B2
10533385 Kutryk Jan 2020 B2
10543512 Frazier Jan 2020 B2
10576503 Amaravadi Mar 2020 B2
10619434 Ross Apr 2020 B2
10641092 Schexnaider May 2020 B2
10643322 Holton May 2020 B2
10646812 Riggs May 2020 B2
10648257 Bingham May 2020 B2
10704345 Zazula Jul 2020 B2
10704346 Frazier Jul 2020 B2
10711545 Babri Jul 2020 B2
10722821 Droke Jul 2020 B2
10722919 Beach Jul 2020 B2
10731428 Ross Aug 2020 B2
10737202 Sharpe Aug 2020 B2
10751654 Kulbeth Aug 2020 B1
10758845 Droke Sep 2020 B2
10773188 Kulbeth Sep 2020 B1
10786766 Strain Sep 2020 B2
10799817 Burnett Oct 2020 B2
10808475 Carr Oct 2020 B2
10815742 Holton Oct 2020 B2
10857488 Kulbeth Dec 2020 B1
10946415 Strobel Mar 2021 B2
10947797 Weber Mar 2021 B2
10948232 Niklaus Mar 2021 B2
10967300 Droke Apr 2021 B2
10974982 Yamashita Apr 2021 B2
11008821 Steger May 2021 B1
11040300 Kulbeth Jun 2021 B1
11059412 Ross Jul 2021 B2
11065646 Vasshus Jul 2021 B2
11090584 Ross Aug 2021 B2
11105164 Culver Aug 2021 B2
11111743 Ross Sep 2021 B2
11123664 Bailey Sep 2021 B2
11141683 Ross Oct 2021 B2
11185802 Peresan Nov 2021 B2
11199063 Ross Dec 2021 B2
11219845 Kulbeth Jan 2022 B1
11219846 Kulbeth Jan 2022 B1
11224831 Kulbeth Jan 2022 B1
11267018 Herrington Mar 2022 B2
11293241 Zazula Apr 2022 B2
11326405 Al-Mousa May 2022 B2
11326406 Kulbeth May 2022 B1
11339618 Shekhar May 2022 B2
11439928 Barnes Sep 2022 B2
11499290 Strobel Nov 2022 B2
11525239 Strobel Dec 2022 B2
11541330 Ross Jan 2023 B2
11549321 Larchar Jan 2023 B2
11560689 Strobel Jan 2023 B2
11572471 Steger Feb 2023 B2
11591866 Carr Feb 2023 B2
11591868 Perez Feb 2023 B1
11634953 Kulbeth Apr 2023 B1
11643888 Kelsey May 2023 B2
11719056 Ivan Aug 2023 B2
11724217 Bingham Aug 2023 B2
11739600 Bingham Aug 2023 B2
11767975 Valdez Sep 2023 B2
11802450 Hou Oct 2023 B2
11806756 Jackson Nov 2023 B2
11840897 Ross Dec 2023 B2
11905677 Strobel Feb 2024 B2
11933121 Krohn Mar 2024 B2
12000221 Culver Jun 2024 B2
20010039887 Reddoch Nov 2001 A1
20020074269 Hensley Jun 2002 A1
20020104806 Pullman Aug 2002 A1
20020162807 Kulbeth Nov 2002 A1
20020175111 Crabbe Nov 2002 A1
20030006201 Boutte Jan 2003 A1
20030047493 Schulte Mar 2003 A1
20030062325 Kulbeth Apr 2003 A1
20030121843 Bratten Jul 2003 A1
20030146174 Hansen Aug 2003 A1
20030201237 Grichar Oct 2003 A1
20040016572 Wylie Jan 2004 A1
20040084355 Seyffert May 2004 A1
20040134863 Tapp Jul 2004 A1
20040154963 Rayborn Aug 2004 A1
20040238414 Schulte Dec 2004 A9
20040245153 Seyffert Dec 2004 A1
20050023038 Seyffert Feb 2005 A1
20050035033 Adams Feb 2005 A1
20050040119 Kulbeth Feb 2005 A1
20050082236 Derrick Apr 2005 A1
20050183994 Hensley Aug 2005 A1
20050199532 Schulte Sep 2005 A1
20050242002 Stone Nov 2005 A1
20050242003 Scott Nov 2005 A1
20050242009 Padalino Nov 2005 A1
20050279715 Strong Dec 2005 A1
20060011520 Schulte Jan 2006 A1
20060016768 Grichar Jan 2006 A1
20060113220 Scott Jun 2006 A1
20060144779 Bailey Jul 2006 A1
20060186056 Ivan Aug 2006 A1
20060243643 Scott Nov 2006 A1
20070084638 Bohnsack Apr 2007 A1
20070108103 Burnett May 2007 A1
20070108104 Burnett May 2007 A1
20070108106 Burnett May 2007 A1
20070131592 Browne Jun 2007 A1
20070278012 Smith Dec 2007 A1
20080078699 Carr Apr 2008 A1
20080078700 Jones Apr 2008 A1
20080083566 Burnett Apr 2008 A1
20080128334 Scott Jun 2008 A1
20080135463 Scott Jun 2008 A1
20080223760 Vasshus Sep 2008 A1
20080230491 Wick Sep 2008 A1
20080251428 Bailey Oct 2008 A1
20080277165 Nahmad Nov 2008 A1
20080283301 Sherwood Nov 2008 A1
20090008560 Gunn Jan 2009 A1
20090057206 Larson Mar 2009 A1
20090120846 Burnett May 2009 A1
20090145664 Larson Jun 2009 A1
20090227477 Burnett Sep 2009 A1
20090242466 Burnett Oct 2009 A1
20090301939 Sorensen Dec 2009 A1
20090308819 Bailey Dec 2009 A1
20100012556 Pohle Jan 2010 A1
20100038143 Burnett Feb 2010 A1
20100089652 Burnett Apr 2010 A1
20100237024 Carr Sep 2010 A1
20100270216 Burnett Oct 2010 A1
20100282648 Bailey Nov 2010 A1
20110005742 Marshall Jan 2011 A1
20110089122 Smith Apr 2011 A1
20110114542 Carr May 2011 A1
20110210083 Scott Sep 2011 A1
20110284481 Pomerleau Nov 2011 A1
20110297373 Timmerman Dec 2011 A1
20120073932 Burnett Mar 2012 A1
20120090898 Ross Apr 2012 A1
20120118798 Scott May 2012 A1
20120152860 Billeaud Jun 2012 A1
20120222854 McClung, III Sep 2012 A1
20120267287 Bailey Oct 2012 A1
20120279932 Pomerleau Nov 2012 A1
20130012372 Wick Jan 2013 A1
20130015115 Landis Jan 2013 A1
20130015141 Landis Jan 2013 A1
20130062261 Bailey Mar 2013 A1
20130074360 Pomerleau Mar 2013 A1
20130092619 Bagnoli Apr 2013 A1
20130092637 Pomerleau Apr 2013 A1
20130105412 Burnett May 2013 A1
20130112631 Vasshus May 2013 A1
20130193090 Vasshus Aug 2013 A1
20130213903 Bailey Aug 2013 A1
20130220945 Carr Aug 2013 A1
20130228532 Carr Sep 2013 A1
20130248465 Sherwood Sep 2013 A1
20130319955 Bailey Dec 2013 A1
20130340791 Steiness Dec 2013 A1
20140021120 Burnett Jan 2014 A1
20140046628 Ligneul Feb 2014 A1
20140091028 Pomerleau Apr 2014 A1
20140157735 Halk Jun 2014 A1
20140190904 Sewell Jul 2014 A1
20140190905 Burnett Jul 2014 A1
20140299443 Mathena Oct 2014 A1
20140332282 Ross Nov 2014 A1
20140339178 Carr Nov 2014 A1
20140357464 Stone Dec 2014 A1
20150048037 Frazier Feb 2015 A1
20150096944 Krush Apr 2015 A1
20150153102 Burnett Jun 2015 A1
20150176351 Carr Jun 2015 A1
20150204151 Pomerleau Jul 2015 A1
20150224427 Vickers Aug 2015 A1
20150308202 Carr Oct 2015 A1
20150330165 Thiessen Nov 2015 A1
20150337609 Carr Nov 2015 A9
20150367259 Imler Dec 2015 A1
20150375145 Sherwood Dec 2015 A1
20150377020 Kronenberger Dec 2015 A1
20160023141 Pomerleau Jan 2016 A1
20160032668 Pomerleau Feb 2016 A1
20160038858 Cady Feb 2016 A1
20160082479 Holton Mar 2016 A1
20160108688 Bailey Apr 2016 A1
20160114267 Cady Apr 2016 A1
20160115065 Yamashita Apr 2016 A1
20160144377 Lomond May 2016 A1
20160177644 Tooley Jun 2016 A1
20160184741 Zazula Jun 2016 A1
20160208568 Barnett Jul 2016 A1
20160250960 Ross Sep 2016 A1
20160281447 Jones Sep 2016 A1
20160319616 Babri Nov 2016 A1
20160356108 Kutryk Dec 2016 A1
20160376858 Rankin Dec 2016 A1
20170001219 Vasshus Jan 2017 A1
20170016288 Culver Jan 2017 A1
20170022771 Frazier Jan 2017 A1
20170057393 Steger Mar 2017 A1
20170058621 Bailey Mar 2017 A1
20170087487 Sharpe Mar 2017 A1
20170130541 Caldwell May 2017 A1
20170138168 Hardeman May 2017 A1
20170145762 Gibson May 2017 A1
20170175464 Cooke Jun 2017 A1
20170203248 Riggs Jul 2017 A1
20170252676 Ross Sep 2017 A1
20170252681 Sewell Sep 2017 A1
20170254163 Ross Sep 2017 A1
20170268303 Zazula Sep 2017 A1
20170291123 Droke Oct 2017 A1
20170298703 Ross Oct 2017 A1
20170312788 Amaravadi Nov 2017 A1
20170320099 Stewart Nov 2017 A1
20170320100 Bingham Nov 2017 A1
20180016856 Li Jan 2018 A1
20180028947 Burnett Feb 2018 A1
20180080318 Schexnaider Mar 2018 A1
20180117503 Ross May 2018 A1
20180126894 Ross May 2018 A1
20180156034 Mitchell Jun 2018 A1
20180171730 Culver Jun 2018 A9
20180171731 Bingham Jun 2018 A1
20180179837 Holton Jun 2018 A1
20180193775 Ross Jul 2018 A1
20180207554 Ross Jul 2018 A1
20180296951 Vasshus Oct 2018 A1
20180304190 Riggs Oct 2018 A1
20180334606 Scalley Nov 2018 A1
20180340069 Steger Nov 2018 A1
20180347299 Ross Dec 2018 A1
20180353997 Frazier Dec 2018 A1
20180371856 Carr Dec 2018 A1
20190060794 Droke Feb 2019 A1
20190063172 Ross Feb 2019 A1
20190145201 Jones May 2019 A1
20190299128 Arefi Oct 2019 A1
20190321857 Bailey Oct 2019 A1
20190329295 Strobel Oct 2019 A1
20190329304 Smith Oct 2019 A1
20190336885 Ross Nov 2019 A1
20190344203 Sewell Nov 2019 A1
20190366241 Droke Dec 2019 A1
20190374976 Herrington Dec 2019 A1
20200018161 Stepanov Jan 2020 A1
20200047091 Bailey Feb 2020 A1
20200131870 Culver Apr 2020 A1
20200179841 Sewell Jun 2020 A1
20200191630 Hardeman Jun 2020 A1
20200208476 Kapila Jul 2020 A1
20200332612 Nazzer Oct 2020 A1
20200340312 Ross Oct 2020 A1
20200363289 Shekhar Nov 2020 A1
20200378199 Weber Dec 2020 A1
20200378200 Krohn Dec 2020 A1
20210016297 Birchfield Jan 2021 A1
20210025253 Carr Jan 2021 A1
20210131203 Bingham May 2021 A1
20210154600 Barnes May 2021 A1
20210189812 Larchar Jun 2021 A1
20210291086 Bingham Sep 2021 A1
20210355770 Ross Nov 2021 A1
20210363839 Al-Mousa Nov 2021 A1
20210372209 Culver Dec 2021 A1
20220228450 Al-Mousa Jul 2022 A1
20220307336 Hou Sep 2022 A1
20230366279 Holman Nov 2023 A1
20230417113 Hou Dec 2023 A1
20240058843 Garza Feb 2024 A1
20240084654 Benkley Mar 2024 A1
20240167348 Iiams May 2024 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
2741955 May 2010 CA
2712774 Nov 2010 CA
2799405 Nov 2011 CA
2997176 Mar 2017 CA
2959851 Sep 2017 CA
3016380 Sep 2017 CA
9108375 Jun 1991 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Canadian Office Action issued in CA 2,997,176, dated Apr. 21, 2022.
Jaeger, “Hermetically sealed solid bowl decanter, a part of solvent chemistry”, Solids/liquids separation practiceand the influence of new techniques: Symposium: Papers and programme, vol. paper 5, 1984, pp.
L. Svarovsky, “Solid-liquid separation”, 3rd edition, section 7.5.3, 1990, pp. 277-278.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/IB2016/055033, dated Mar. 15, 2018.
Canadian Office Action in counterpart Canadian Application No. 2,959,851, dated Apr. 4, 2023.
Canadian Office Action in counterpart Canadian Application No. 2,959,851, dated Apr. 3, 2024.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210355770 A1 Nov 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62303169 Mar 2016 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15447971 Mar 2017 US
Child 17385614 US