This application is a National Stage of PCT/SE2005/001267 filed Sep. 2, 2005 which in turn claims priority from Swedish Application 0402159-8, filed Sep. 9, 2004 disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a, in the closed state, gas-tight transport container of circular cross section and having an interior which can be made accessible by the fact that the two container parts obtained in the separation and demarcated one from the other are arranged so as to be openable one from the other by separation transversely to their own specific longitudinal direction, in which the two container parts, upon closure of the container, are locked one against the other by means of an intervening locking ring which is rotatable relative to the container parts transversely to their mutually facing end edges and which is locked in both container parts in one and the same locking operation by means of integral coupling elements.
The aforementioned invention can also be supplemented so that it also comprises a, in the closed state, gas-tight container, which is openable and closable by remote control, for the transport of detonation-dangerous material. The container in question should also, where necessary, be able to be used for the detonation of dangerous material inside the same. It should also withstand high detonation pressure and splintering which might have been caused in the detonation. Moreover, it should be designed such that the repair of the same, after an internal detonation therein bordering on its tolerance limit, is limited to an absolute minimum.
The term detonation-proof transport container has below been applied more or less generally. Of course, there is a limit to what a container of whatever type is capable of withstanding of internal detonations. In this case, therefore, we have considered the term to be relevant, since it precisely defines what we intended with the device according to the invention.
Regardless of how an openable detonation-proof container of the aforementioned kind is designed, its weakest point, in the great majority of cases, will be constituted by its opening and the members which are used to keep the opening closed and gas-tight even after an internal detonation. At the same time, it is the sealing members of the opening function which, by necessity, must be made most complex and will therefore be most difficult to repair or replace.
Detonation-proof containers of the aforementioned kind are found in many different types and if they are really large they are generally provided with some kind of inward-opening door, which, in the closed state, seals against a pressure-absorbing door frame disposed outside the door. In the case of smaller detonation-proof chambers, it is very often impossible to use any inward-opening door or hatch, since this, in the open state and during the opening and closing operations, will block far too large a part of the inner capacity of the chamber. Smaller detonation-proof chambers must therefore often be made openable by separation.
In Swedish patent SE 9900624-9 there is described, for example, a transport container of this type for detonation-dangerous material, comprising a first substantially cylindrical container having a convex rear end face and an opening disposed in the other end of the cylinder, which opening covers the whole of the cross-sectional area thereof and is surrounded by a flange extending outwards from the opening and surrounding the same. The flange, in turn, forms part of the arrangement which is used to shut the chamber. In addition, the transport container according to the patent incorporates a second cap part of corresponding shape and cross-sectional measurement and provided with the same type of flange, which, however, when the container is to be closed, is turned in the opposite direction. In order to join together these two container parts, according to the invention an inner and an outer locking ring are used, which are held together by locking bolts. In the closed state, this detonation-proof chamber offers a wholly satisfactory protection for the environment and its closing function is easy to replace or repair in case of possible damage to the same caused by an internal, all too powerful detonation. However, the closing function in this design is constituted by a number of loose parts, which make it complicated to fit it in place with a remote-controlled manipulator, something which nowadays is often more or less a requirement.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved, detonation-proof transport container for the storage and transport of detonation-dangerous or suspected detonation-dangerous material, which substantially eliminates the abovementioned problems.
The said object, and other aims which are not here enumerated, are satisfactorily met within the scope of that which is defined in the independent patent claim. Embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent patent claims.
Thus, according to the present invention, an improved gas-tight transport container has been produced, which is characterized in that the transport container is detonation-proof for the storage and transport of detonation-dangerous or suspected detonation-dangerous material, in that, upon opening of the transport container, the two container parts are arranged so as to be axially displaceable one relative to each other, in that the locking ring has a multi-toothed double-sided bayonet coupling comprising two oppositely directed locking grooves with mutually facing coupling elements of the container parts disposed on either side thereof, whilst these container parts, in turn, have coupling elements matched to their respective bayonet coupling and each comprising a respective toothed rim, and in that the locking ring, upon closure of the transport container, can be rotated by a distance corresponding to at least one tooth width on the toothed rim to which the locking groove is matched.
According to further aspects of a detonation-proof transport container according to the invention, the following applies:
The present invention now offers a transport container for detonation-dangerous or suspected detonation-dangerous material which is detonation-proof, is gas-tight in the closed state and can be opened by separation, and whose opening and closing function is suited to manipulation by remote control. Since the transport container according to the invention is opened by separation and the respective parts of the container are relatively heavy, it is expediently opened by its respective parts being mutually displaced in the axial direction along a rail system. For easier accessibility, moreover, one or both of the container parts, in their outer end position away from the other container part, may, if so desired, be made rotatable relative to the other container part and relative to the rail system.
The specific novelty with the transport container according to the invention is the manner in which its two parts are held together in the closed state. The two transport container parts are namely provided along their, in the closing position, mutually facing end edges with a considerable number of, along the outer and inner peripheries respectively of the said end edges, outward and inward facing locking teeth, which are combined to form a double toothed rim fixedly joined to the transport container wall. These respective toothed rims, which thus constitute the end edge of the respective transport container part, each therefore have a plurality of outward and inward facing locking teeth standing directly one in front of the other in the radial direction. Situated between the locking teeth in the respective toothed rim are tooth gaps arranged correspondingly one in front of the other in the radial direction. For geometric reasons, the number of locking teeth is equal to the number of tooth gaps. Since the, in the described manner, outward facing toothed rim automatically gains access to a larger periphery than the inward facing one, both tooth widths and tooth gap widths in the respective toothed rim are matched to the periphery accessible to the respective toothed rim.
In order to hold together the transport container parts in the brought-together closing position, according to the invention a specially configured locking ring is additionally used, which is rotatable relative to the container parts. This special locking ring thus has two oppositely directed locking grooves, each matched to the double-sided toothed rim of the respective transport container part, i.e. each locking groove has along its outer and its inner periphery the same number of locking teeth and tooth gaps as the double toothed rim to which it is matched. In addition, between the bottom of the respective locking groove and the locking teeth disposed along the peripheries of the locking groove there is a free space corresponding at least to the tooth width for the double toothed rim matched to the respective locking groove.
Locking teeth and tooth gaps in the locking ring and the double-sided toothed rims of the transport container parts are additionally coordinated so that the locking teeth in the toothed rim of the respective transport container, when the containers are pushed together into the closing position, are guided into matching tooth gaps in the locking grooves of the locking ring. As soon as the transport container parts have been fully pushed together, the locking ring is next rotated into the locked position, i.e. with the locking teeth in the locking ring wholly behind matching locking teeth in the respective toothed rim. For purely practical reasons, it is generally expedient to arrange for one of the parts of the transport container to be stationary and, upon opening of the container, to laterally displace the other one and likewise join the locking ring axially yet rotatably to the said fixed part. The other axially displaceable part of the container can, if so desired, be made rotatable so as to facilitate the supply or the removal of explosion-dangerous material. The supply and the removal of such material from the container can then be carried out using suitable manipulators. From the above-stated, it will be clearly apparent that all activities associated with the handling of the device according to the invention can be performed without difficulty by remote control behind safe protection. The device according to the invention thus meets all the requirements which might be placed upon devices of the aforementioned kind.
An additional advantage of the device according to the invention is, furthermore, that, since the toothed rims of the container parts are end-mounted, they are easy to replace in case of possible damage, whilst, at the same time, the rotatable locking ring is a loose part which can also therefore be easily replaced.
Further advantages and effects will emerge from study and consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, including one of its advantageous embodiments, the patent claims and the accompanying drawing figures.
The invention has been defined in the following patent claims and it will now be described only somewhat further in conjunction with the appended figures, in which:
In the various figures, corresponding components have been given the same reference notations irrespective of the scales of the figures.
The detonation-proof transport container according to
As can further be seen from
The more complete transport container according to the invention, shown in
The invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiment but can be variously modified within the scope of the patent claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0402159 | Sep 2004 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2005/001267 | 9/2/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/19/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/041351 | 4/20/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1144683 | Barder | Jun 1915 | A |
1297305 | Thatcher | Mar 1919 | A |
2841308 | Weicker | Jul 1958 | A |
2936093 | Passalaqua | May 1960 | A |
3107810 | King | Oct 1963 | A |
3653533 | Mortensen | Apr 1972 | A |
3655090 | Rothrock et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3804288 | Piegza | Apr 1974 | A |
3886047 | Billups, Jr. | May 1975 | A |
3990605 | Hanke et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4100783 | Gambarov et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4219125 | Wiltshire et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4466551 | Leung | Aug 1984 | A |
4978023 | Behlmann et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5411162 | Koziczkowski et al. | May 1995 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33598 | Aug 1981 | EP |
195082 | Jan 1982 | JP |
2000161491 | Jun 2000 | JP |
462184 | May 1990 | SE |
Entry |
---|
English Translation of Office Action in corresponding application JP 2007-531112, mailed Nov. 12, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080314903 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |