This disclosure relates to gas turbine engine airfoils. More particularly the disclosure relates to airfoil gap/chord ratio in, for example, a gas turbine engine compressor or fan section.
A turbine engine such as a gas turbine engine typically includes a fan section, a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section. Air entering the compressor section is compressed and delivered into the combustor section where it is mixed with fuel and ignited to generate a high-speed exhaust gas flow. The high-speed exhaust gas flow expands through the turbine section to drive the compressor and the fan section. The compressor section typically includes at least low and high pressure compressors, and the turbine section includes at least low and high pressure turbines.
Direct drive gas turbine engines include a fan section that is driven directly by one of the turbine shafts. Rotor blades in the fan section and a low pressure compressor of the compressor section of direct drive engines rotate in the same direction.
Gas turbine engines have been proposed in which a geared architecture is arranged between the fan section and at least some turbines in the turbine section. The geared architecture enables the associated compressor of the compressor section to be driven at much higher rotational speeds, improving overall efficiency of the engine. The propulsive efficiency of a gas turbine engine depends on many different factors, such as the design of the engine and the resulting performance debits on the fan that propels the engine and the compressor section downstream from the fan. Physical interaction between the fan and the air causes downstream turbulence and further losses. Although some basic principles behind such losses are understood, identifying and changing appropriate design factors to reduce such losses for a given engine architecture has proven to be a complex and elusive task.
Similarly, the fan section can also be a significant noise source, as noise is produced by fluid dynamic interaction between the fan blades and the incoming air stream. Some fan blade arrangements have channels that converge at a location downstream of the fan blade leading edges for most or all span positions in an attempt to reduce noise. However, fan blade arrangements that may attempt to mitigate noise may come at the expense of reduced propulsive efficiency.
Prior compressor airfoil geometries may not be suitable for the compressor section of gas turbine engines using a geared architecture, since the significantly different speeds of the compressor changes the desired aerodynamics of the airfoils within the compressor section. Counter-rotating fan and compressor blades, which may be used in geared architecture engines, also present design challenges.
An airfoil arrangement of a turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes adjacent airfoils including pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position. The airfoils have a relationship between a gap/chord ratio and span position that defines a curve with a gap/chord ratio having a portion with a negative slope. The adjacent airfoils are rotatable blades.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.0 at 100% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.0 at each span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 0.9 at 0% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.04 from 80% span to 100% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 0.7 at 0% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the portion is from 80% span to 100% span.
A compressor section according to an example of the present disclosure includes a plurality of rotatable blades and a plurality of vanes arranged about an axis, wherein adjacent blades include pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position. The adjacent blades have a relationship between a gap/chord ratio and span position that defines a curve with a gap/chord ratio having a portion with a negative slope.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.0 at 100% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 0.7 at 0% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.0 at each span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.04 from 80% span to 100% span, and the portion is from 80% span to 100% span.
A gas turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes a combustor section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section, a fan section including an array of fan blades, and adjacent airfoils including pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position. The airfoils have a relationship between a gap/chord ratio and span position that defines a curve with a gap/chord ratio having a portion with a negative slope, and the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.04 at 100% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the fan section includes twenty-six or fewer fan blades, and has a fan pressure ratio that is less than 1.55.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the airfoils are rotatable relative to an engine static structure.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the airfoils are arranged in the compressor section.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is greater than 0.6 at each span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the compressor section includes a first compressor section and a second compressor section. The second compressor section is arranged immediately upstream of the combustor section, and the airfoils are provided in the first compressor section.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the first compressor section is immediately downstream from the fan section and is counter-rotating relative to the array of fan blades.
A further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments includes a gear arrangement configured to drive the fan section, wherein the turbine section is configured to drive the gear arrangement and the compressor section.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the gap/chord ratio is less than 0.9 at 0% span, and the gap/chord ratio is less than 1.04 from 80% span to 100% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the foregoing embodiments, the portion is from 80% span to 100% span, and the curve has another portion with a positive slope.
These and other features of this disclosure will be better understood upon reading the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
The disclosure can be further understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The embodiments, examples and alternatives of the preceding paragraphs, the claims, or the following description and drawings, including any of their various aspects or respective individual features, may be taken independently or in any combination. Features described in connection with one embodiment are applicable to all embodiments, unless such features are incompatible.
The exemplary engine 20 generally includes a low speed spool 30 and a high speed spool 32 mounted for rotation about an engine central longitudinal axis X relative to an engine static structure 36 via several bearing systems 38. It should be understood that various bearing systems 38 at various locations may alternatively or additionally be provided, and the location of bearing systems 38 may be varied as appropriate to the application.
The low speed spool 30 generally includes an inner shaft 40 that interconnects a fan 42, a first (or low) pressure compressor 44 and a first (or low) pressure turbine 46. The inner shaft 40 is connected to the fan 42 through a speed change mechanism, which in exemplary gas turbine engine 20 is illustrated as a geared architecture 48 to drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. The high speed spool 32 includes an outer shaft 50 that interconnects a second (or high) pressure compressor 52 and a second (or high) pressure turbine 54. A combustor 56 is arranged in exemplary gas turbine 20 between the high pressure compressor 52 and the high pressure turbine 54. A mid-turbine frame 57 of the engine static structure 36 is arranged generally between the high pressure turbine 54 and the low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 further supports bearing systems 38 in the turbine section 28. The inner shaft 40 and the outer shaft 50 are concentric and rotate via bearing systems 38 about the engine central longitudinal axis X which is collinear with their longitudinal axes.
The core airflow is compressed by the low pressure compressor 44 then the high pressure compressor 52, mixed and burned with fuel in the combustor 56, then expanded over the high pressure turbine 54 and low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 includes airfoils 59 which are in the core airflow path C. The turbines 46, 54 rotationally drive the respective low speed spool 30 and high speed spool 32 in response to the expansion. It will be appreciated that each of the positions of the fan section 22, compressor section 24, combustor section 26, turbine section 28, and fan drive gear system 48 may be varied. For example, gear system 48 may be located aft of combustor section 26 or even aft of turbine section 28, and fan section 22 may be positioned forward or aft of the location of gear system 48.
The engine 20 in one example is a high-bypass geared aircraft engine. In a further example, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10), the geared architecture 48 is an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3 and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about ten (10:1), the fan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 44, and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five (5:1). Low pressure turbine 46 pressure ratio is pressure measured prior to inlet of low pressure turbine 46 as related to the pressure at the outlet of the low pressure turbine 46 prior to an exhaust nozzle. The geared architecture 48 may be an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.
The example gas turbine engine includes the fan 42 that comprises in one non-limiting embodiment less than about twenty-six (26) fan blades. In another non-limiting embodiment, the fan section 22 includes less than about twenty (20) fan blades. Moreover, in one disclosed embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes no more than about six (6) turbine rotors schematically indicated at 34. In another non-limiting example embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes about three (3) turbine rotors. A ratio between the number of fan blades 42 and the number of low pressure turbine rotors is between about 3.3 and about 8.6. The example low pressure turbine 46 provides the driving power to rotate the fan section 22 and therefore the relationship between the number of turbine rotors 34 in the low pressure turbine 46 and the number of blades 42 in the fan section 22 disclose an example gas turbine engine 20 with increased power transfer efficiency.
A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 22 of the engine 20 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet (10,668 meters). The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft (10,668 meters), with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (‘TSFC’)”—is the industry standard parameter of lbm of fuel being burned divided by lbf of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point. “Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without a Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.55. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is less than about 1.45. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is from 1.1 to 1.45. “Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5. The “Low corrected fan tip speed” as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1200 ft/second (365.7 meters/second).
Referring to
The disclosed airfoils may be used in a low pressure compressor of a two spool engine or in portions of other compressor configurations, such as low, intermediate and/or high pressure areas of a three spool engine. However, it should be understood that any of the disclosed airfoils may be used for blades or vanes, and in any of the compressor section, turbine section and fan section.
In some examples, the fan section 22 includes a hardwall containment system 23 arranged about the engine axis A and spaced radially from the fan blades 42. The hardwall containment system 23 is configured to contain, and absorb the impact of, a fan blade 42 separating from a fan hub 77 or a fragment thereof. In some embodiments, the hardwall containment system 23 is a hard ballistic liner applied to the nacelle or fan case 15. The hard ballistic liner can include a rigid material such as a resin impregnated fiber structure, metallic structures, or ceramic structures.
Various materials and structures of the fan case 15 and/or hardwall containment system 23 can be utilized. In some examples, the fan section 22 includes a composite fan case 15 made of an organic matrix composite. The organic matrix composite can include a matrix material and reinforcement fibers distributed through the matrix material. The reinforcement fibers may be discontinuous or continuous, depending upon the desired properties of the organic matrix composite, for example. The matrix material may be a thermoset polymer or a thermoplastic polymer. The reinforcement fibers may include carbon graphite, silica glass, silicon carbide, or ceramic. Given this description, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other types of matrix materials and reinforcement fibers may be used. The disclosed arrangements of the composite fan case 15 reduce the overall weight of the nacelle assembly, thereby improving propulsive efficiency and overall performance.
Referring to
Airfoils in each stage of the fan section or LPC are specifically designed radially from an inner airfoil location (0% span) to an outer airfoil location (100% span) and along circumferentially opposite pressure and suction sides 72, 74 extending in chord between a leading and trailing edges 68, 70 (see
The airfoil 64 has an exterior surface 76 providing a contour that extends from a leading edge 68 generally aftward in a chord-wise direction H to a trailing edge 70, as shown in
The exterior surface 76 of the airfoil 64 generates lift based upon its geometry and directs flow along the core flow path C. The airfoil 64 may be constructed from a composite material, or an aluminum alloy or titanium alloy, or a combination of one or more of these. Abrasion-resistant coatings or other protective coatings may be applied to the airfoil. The rotor stages may constructed as an integrally bladed rotor, if desired, or discrete blades having roots secured within corresponding rotor slots of a disc. The stators may be provided by individual vanes, clusters of vanes, or a full ring of vanes.
In some examples, the airfoil 64′ is three-dimensional composite free of a central core. In other examples, the airfoil 64′ includes one or more cores 75. The core 75 can include a foam or other lightweight material such as polyurethane. Other materials can be utilized, such as metallic foam and polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam sold under the trade name Rohacell®. In other examples, the core 75 is formed from one or more plies of fabric or from braided yarns.
Each airfoil 64′ can include a sheath 95. In some examples, a sheath 95a is located at a leading edge 68 of the airfoil 64′. In other examples, a sheath 95b is located at a trailing edge 70 of the airfoil 64′. Other locations of the sheath 95 are contemplated, such as on pressure and/or suction sides 72, 74 of the airfoil 64′. In another example, a sheath 95 extends across at least a portion of the airfoil tip 66 between the leading edge 68 and trailing edge 70 of the airfoil 64′. Various materials of the sheath 95 can be utilized, such as titanium, a steel alloy or another material.
Airfoil geometries can be described with respect to various parameters provided. The disclosed graph(s) illustrate the relationships between the referenced parameters within 10% of the desired values, which correspond to a hot aerodynamic design point for the airfoil. In another example, the referenced parameters are within 5% of the desired values, and in another example, the reference parameters are within 2% of the desired values. It should be understood that the airfoils may be oriented differently than depicted, depending on the rotational direction of the blades. The signs (positive or negative) used, if any, in the graphs of this disclosure are controlling and the drawings should then be understood as a schematic representation of one example airfoil if inconsistent with the graphs. The signs in this disclosure, including any graphs, comply with the “right hand rule.”
The geared architecture 48 of the disclosed example permits the fan 42 to be driven by the low pressure turbine 46 through the low speed spool 30 at a lower angular speed than the low pressure turbine 46, which enables the LPC 44 to rotate at higher, more useful speeds. The gap/chord ratio in a hot, running condition along the span of the airfoils 64 provides necessary fan or compressor operation in cruise at higher speeds enabled by the geared architecture 48, to enhance aerodynamic functionality and thermal efficiency. As used herein, the hot, running condition is the condition during cruise of the gas turbine engine 20. For example, the gap/chord ratio in the hot, running condition can be determined in a known manner using finite element analysis.
The initial gap/chord ratio is also less than in prior art airfoils. In one example, the gap/chord ratio of less than 0.9 at 0% span, and in another example, the gap/chord ratio of less than 0.8 at 0% span. In another example, the gap/chord ratio of less than 0.7 at 0% span.
In examples, in which the airfoil is located in the compressor section, the gap/chord ratio of the inventive curves is less than prior art airfoils due to the higher speed of the LPC, which maintains the efficiency of the airfoils. A larger gap/chord ratio than the inventive curves, such as those similar to prior art airfoils, would permit the core flow to pass through the blades without sufficiently compressing the fluid, thereby reducing compressor effectiveness.
The channel 96 is provided with an inlet 99 at the leading edge 68 of airfoil 64B and an outlet 100 downstream of the inlet 99. In some examples, the width of the channel 96 diverges without converging in a chordwise direction along the channel 96 for at least some of the span positions. In further examples, the width of the channel 96 diverges without converging in a chordwise direction along the channel 96 for each of the span positions. This arrangement is shown in
In other examples, at some span positions the channel width 98 converges along the channel 96 to define a nozzle 102, where 102 is labeled at a throat of the nozzle, configured to meter flow of the incoming air through the channel 96. The nozzle 102 defines a minimum channel width 98 along the channel 96. The nozzle 102 is located downstream of a position along the pressure side 72 of airfoil 64B at a radius defined by the leading edge 68. Rather, the inlet 99 is characterized in part by the geometry of the leading edge 68 (best seen in
Various arrangements for the nozzle 102 can be utilized in accordance with the teachings herein. In one example, the nozzle 102 extends radially from about a 0% span position. In another example, the nozzle 102 is spaced radially from the 0% span position. In some examples, the channel width 98 converges and diverges along the channel 96 at span positions greater than 5% span, greater than 10% span, or greater than about 20% span. In another example, the nozzle 102 extends, less than or equal to about 50% of the span positions. In yet another example, the nozzle 102 extends less than or equal to about 20% of the span positions, and in further examples, the nozzle 102 extends radially outward less than or equal to about 20% span. In some examples, the channel width 98 diverges without converging for greater than or equal to about 80% of the span positions. In some examples, the channel width 98 diverges without converging at the tip 66 or 100% span such that a nozzle is not formed at the tip 66. In further examples, the channel width 98 diverges without converging from 100% span to about 80% span, or from 100% span to about 50% span.
Engines made with the disclosed architecture, and including the compressor and fan section arrangements as set forth in this application, and with modifications coming from the scope of the claims in this application, thus provide very high efficient operation, have reduced noise emissions, and are compact and lightweight relative to their thrust capability. Two-spool and three-spool direct drive engine architectures can also benefit from the teachings herein.
It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom. Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
Although the different examples have specific components shown in the illustrations, embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from one of the examples in combination with features or components from another one of the examples.
Although an example embodiment has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/626,130, filed Feb. 19, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/941,671, which was filed on Feb. 19, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2714499 | Warner | Aug 1955 | A |
2746672 | Doll, Jr. | May 1956 | A |
2934259 | Hausmann | Apr 1960 | A |
3287906 | McCormick | Nov 1966 | A |
3747343 | Rosen | Jul 1973 | A |
3754484 | Roberts | Aug 1973 | A |
3867062 | Troller | Feb 1975 | A |
3892358 | Gisslen | Jul 1975 | A |
3905191 | Matto | Sep 1975 | A |
4012172 | Schwaar | Mar 1977 | A |
4130872 | Haloff | Dec 1978 | A |
4431376 | Lubenstein et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4682935 | Martin | Jul 1987 | A |
4826400 | Gregory | May 1989 | A |
4900230 | Patel | Feb 1990 | A |
4919593 | Brown | Apr 1990 | A |
5088892 | Weingold et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5141400 | Murphy et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5167489 | Wadia | Dec 1992 | A |
5192190 | Ferleger | Mar 1993 | A |
5211703 | Ferleger | May 1993 | A |
5221181 | Ferleger | Jun 1993 | A |
5277549 | Chen | Jan 1994 | A |
5433674 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443367 | Samit et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447411 | Curley et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5524341 | Ferleger | Jun 1996 | A |
5524847 | Brodell et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5525038 | Sharma et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5624234 | Neely et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642985 | Spear et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5725354 | Wadia et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5778659 | Duesler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5857836 | Stickler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915917 | Eveker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5975841 | Lindemuth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6059532 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071077 | Rowlands | Jun 2000 | A |
6079948 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6195983 | Wadia | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223616 | Sheridan | May 2001 | B1 |
6299412 | Wood et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312219 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318070 | Rey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328533 | Decker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331100 | Liu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341942 | Chou et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6565334 | Bradbury | May 2003 | B1 |
6814541 | Evans et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6899526 | Doloresco et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6994524 | Owen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021042 | Law | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7204676 | Dutton et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7374403 | Decker et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396205 | Dube et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7476086 | Wadia et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497664 | Walter et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7547186 | Schuster et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7591754 | Duong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7785074 | Novori | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785075 | Botrel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806653 | Burton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824305 | Duong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7926260 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7967571 | Wood et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997872 | Wilson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997882 | Shulver et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8087885 | Suciu et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8147207 | Orosa et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167548 | Greim | May 2012 | B2 |
8167567 | Kirchner et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8205432 | Sheridan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246292 | Morin et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
RE43710 | Spear et al. | Oct 2012 | E |
8382438 | Guemmer | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8393870 | Nash et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8464426 | Kirchner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020021968 | Olhofer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020141863 | Liu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030086788 | Chandraker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163983 | Seda et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040091353 | Shahpar et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050031454 | Doloresco et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050169761 | Dube et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050254956 | Dutton et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276693 | Liu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060163983 | Wu | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060210395 | Schuster | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222488 | Fessou | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228206 | Decker | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070041841 | Walter et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070160478 | Jarrah et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070201983 | Arinci et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070243068 | Wadia | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080098718 | Henry | May 2008 | A1 |
20080101959 | McRae et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120839 | Schilling | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148564 | Burton et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226454 | Decker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090257866 | Greim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090317227 | Grover et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054946 | Orosa | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100148396 | Xie et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100232970 | Murooka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254797 | Grover et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260609 | Wood et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100331139 | McCune | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110081252 | Li | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135482 | Nash et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150660 | Micheli | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206527 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225979 | Hoeger et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110268578 | Praisner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286850 | Micheli | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286856 | Micheli | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120057982 | O'Hearn et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120195767 | Gervais et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120243975 | Breeze-Stringfellow | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244005 | Breeze-Stringfellow et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130008170 | Gallagher et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022473 | Tran | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130089415 | Brown | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130149108 | Webster | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164488 | Wood et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130189117 | Baltas et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130192266 | Houston | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130202403 | Morin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219922 | Gilson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224040 | Straccia | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266451 | Pesteil et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130315739 | Cellier | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130340406 | Gallagher | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140030060 | Magowan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140248155 | Merville | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150017012 | Pouzadoux et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150118059 | Perrot | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150354367 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160195104 | Cellier | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1903642 | Aug 1970 | DE |
0251978 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0661413 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0745755 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0801230 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1074700 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1098092 | May 2001 | EP |
1106835 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1106836 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1111188 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1505302 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1508669 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1524405 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1582695 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1939399 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2075408 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2133573 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2226468 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2535527 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2543818 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2631491 | Aug 2013 | EP |
1516041 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2041090 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2170868 | Aug 1986 | GB |
2007038674 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008109036 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 201314935 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014066503 | May 2014 | WO |
2015126449 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Willis, Quiet Clean Short-Haul Experimental Engine (QCSEE) Final Report, NASA, 1979. |
Oyama et al., Multiobjective Optimization of a Multi-Stage Compressor Using Evolutionary Algorithm, NASA, 2002, AIAA 2002-3535. |
Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006. |
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida. |
Agarwal, B.D and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York. |
Carney, K., Pereira, M. Revilock, and Matheny, P. Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. |
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers,108(8), 65-67. |
Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe and science technology. Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis. |
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998. |
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.C., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in NASA's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007. |
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modem Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case. |
Hall, C.A. and Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, 479-487. |
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37(20), 1821-1837. |
Brennan, P.J. and Kroliczek, E.J. (1979). Heat pipe design handbook. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration by B & K Engineering, Inc. Jun. 1979. |
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. |
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. |
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233. |
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987. |
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report NASA/CR-159473. |
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189. |
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978. |
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995. |
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. |
Lau K., Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436. |
Shorter Oxford English dictionary, 6th Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888. |
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. |
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25. |
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. |
Pyrograf-III Carbon Nanofiber. Product guide. Retrieved from: http://pyrografproducts.com/Merchant5/merchant.mvc?Screen=cp—nanofiber. |
Nanocor Technical Data for Epoxy Nanocomposites using Nanomer 1.30E Nanoclay. Nnacor, Inc. |
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers. |
Wendus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport. NASA/CR-2003-212467. |
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M. The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126. |
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982. |
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876. |
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. |
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 12-15, 1983. |
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972. |
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012. |
Ivchenko-Progress AI-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007. |
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009. |
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010. |
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010. |
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012. |
NASA Conference Publication. Quiet, powered-lift propulsion. Cleveland, Ohio. Nov. 14-15, 1978. |
“Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications”, Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005). |
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8), p. 32. |
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710. |
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883. |
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104. |
Rogalsky, T., Derksen, R.W., and Kocabiyik, S. (1999). An aerodynamic design technique for optimizing fan blade spacing. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Society of Canada, 1999. |
Glassman, A.J. ed. (1973). Turbine design and application, vol. 2, NASA, 1973. |
Metzger, F.B., Hanson, D.B., Menthe, Ran., and Towle, G.B. (1973). Analytical parametric investiation of low pressure ratio fan noise. Prepared by Hamilton Standard for Langley Research Center. NASA, 1973. |
Dyama, A. and Liou, M-S. Multiobjective optimization of a multi-stage compressor using evolutionary algorithm. NASA, 2002, AIAA 2002-3535, pp. 1-11. |
Smith, L. and Yeh, H. (1963). Sweep and dihedral effects in axial-flow turbomachinery. Journal of Basic Engineering, Sep. 1963, pp. 401-416. |
Engine Specifications, Engine Alliance GP7200—The Engine for the A380. Retrieved Feb. 19, 2015 from http://www.enginealliance.comiengine—specifications.html. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 14883154.8. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2017 for European Application No. 14883117.5. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 15752432.3. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 26, 2017 for European Application No. 15793425.8. |
Partial EP Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2017 for European Application No. 15793193.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2017 for European Application No. 15752887.8. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2017 for European Application No. 14883515.0. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2017 for European Application No. 15752124.6. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2017 for European Application No. 15751498.5. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15751454.8. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15793323.5. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15796827.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15792194.1. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15751738.4. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15752593.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 14883036.7. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 22, 2017 for European Application No. 15793112.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 20, 2017 for European Application No. 15793268.2. |
Gray, D.E. et al. (1978). Energy efficient engine preliminary design and integration study. United Technologies Corporation; Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Group. Prepared for NASA. Nov. 1, 1978. pp. 1-366. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052282, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016554, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052434, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052516, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052447, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052080, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032 mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561 mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
Extended EP Search report for EP Application No. 157931932 dated May 12, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160131151 A1 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61941671 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14626130 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 14996351 | US |