This disclosure relates generally to an airfoil for gas turbine engines, and more particularly to a fan or compressor blade and the relationship between the blade's tangential stacking offset relative to span.
A turbine engine such as a gas turbine engine typically includes a fan section, a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section. Air entering the compressor section is compressed and delivered into the combustor section where it is mixed with fuel and ignited to generate a high-speed exhaust gas flow. The high-speed exhaust gas flow expands through the turbine section to drive the compressor and the fan section. The compressor section typically includes low and high pressure compressors, and the turbine section includes low and high pressure turbines.
The propulsive efficiency of a gas turbine engine depends on many different factors, such as the design of the engine and the resulting performance debits on the fan that propels the engine. As an example, the fan may rotate at a high rate of speed such that air passes over the fan airfoils at transonic or supersonic speeds. The fast-moving air creates flow discontinuities or shocks that result in irreversible propulsive losses. Additionally, physical interaction between the fan and the air causes downstream turbulence and further losses. Although some basic principles behind such losses are understood, identifying and changing appropriate design factors to reduce such losses for a given engine architecture has proven to be a complex and elusive task.
In one exemplary embodiment, an airfoil of a turbine engine includes pressure and suction sides that extend in a radial direction from a 0% span position at an inner flow path location to a 100% span position at an airfoil tip. The airfoil has a relationship between a tangential stacking offset and a span position that is at least a third order polynomial curve that includes at least one positive and negative slope. The positive slope leans toward the suction side and the negative slope leans toward the pressure side. An initial slope starts at the 0% span position is either zero or positive. The first critical point is less than 15% span.
In a further embodiment of the above, the curve has at least two critical points.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the airfoil extends from a root. A zero tangential stacking offset corresponds to tangential center of the root.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the curve has an initial positive slope.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the first critical point has an Rd/Yd ratio in a range of 195 to 205.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second critical point is in the range of 35-45% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second critical point has an Rd/Yd ratio in a range of 1950 to 2050.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the curve does not cross the zero tangential stacking offset.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the curve crosses the zero tangential stacking offset once.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, a critical point in a 35-45% span range has a Rd/Yd ratio in a range of −70 to −74.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the curve has an initial zero slope.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the first critical point is in the range of 35-45% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the first critical point has an Rd/Yd ratio in a range of −108 to −116.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second critical point is in the range of 85-95% span.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second critical point has an Rd/Yd ratio in a range of 23 to 26.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the curve crosses the zero tangential stacking offset twice.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the airfoil is a fan blade for a gas turbine engine.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the fan blade is a composite blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the composite blade is a swept blade.
In another exemplary embodiment, a gas turbine engine includes a combustor section that is arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section. A fan section has an array of twenty-six or fewer fan blades. The fan section has a low fan pressure ratio of less than or equal to about 1.7. A geared architecture couples the fan section to the turbine section or the compressor section. The fan blades include a root. An airfoil has pressure and suction sides and extends from the root in a radial direction from a 0% span position at an inner flow path location to a 100% span position at an airfoil tip. The airfoil has a relationship between a tangential stacking offset and a span position that is at least a third order polynomial curve that includes at least one positive and negative slope. The positive slope leans toward the suction side and the negative slope leans toward the pressure side. A zero tangential stacking offset corresponds to tangential center of the root. The 0% span position is offset from the zero tangential stacking offset. The first critical point is less than 15% span.
The disclosure can be further understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The embodiments, examples and alternatives of the preceding paragraphs, the claims, or the following description and drawings, including any of their various aspects or respective individual features, may be taken independently or in any combination. Features described in connection with one embodiment are applicable to all embodiments, unless such features are incompatible.
The exemplary engine 20 generally includes a low speed spool 30 and a high speed spool 32 mounted for rotation about an engine central longitudinal axis X relative to an engine static structure 36 via several bearing systems 38. It should be understood that various bearing systems 38 at various locations may alternatively or additionally be provided, and the location of bearing systems 38 may be varied as appropriate to the application.
The low speed spool 30 generally includes an inner shaft 40 that interconnects a fan 42, a first (or low) pressure compressor 44 and a first (or low) pressure turbine 46. The inner shaft 40 is connected to the fan 42 through a speed change mechanism, which in exemplary gas turbine engine 20 is illustrated as a geared architecture 48 to drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. The high speed spool 32 includes an outer shaft 50 that interconnects a second (or high) pressure compressor 52 and a second (or high) pressure turbine 54. A combustor 56 is arranged in exemplary gas turbine 20 between the high pressure compressor 52 and the high pressure turbine 54. A mid-turbine frame 57 of the engine static structure 36 is arranged generally between the high pressure turbine 54 and the low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 further supports bearing systems 38 in the turbine section 28. The inner shaft 40 and the outer shaft 50 are concentric and rotate via bearing systems 38 about the engine central longitudinal axis X which is collinear with their longitudinal axes.
The core airflow is compressed by the low pressure compressor 44 then the high pressure compressor 52, mixed and burned with fuel in the combustor 56, then expanded over the high pressure turbine 54 and low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 includes airfoils 59 which are in the core airflow path C. The turbines 46, 54 rotationally drive the respective low speed spool 30 and high speed spool 32 in response to the expansion. It will be appreciated that each of the positions of the fan section 22, compressor section 24, combustor section 26, turbine section 28, and fan drive gear system 48 may be varied. For example, gear system 48 may be located aft of combustor section 26 or even aft of turbine section 28, and fan section 22 may be positioned forward or aft of the location of gear system 48.
The engine 20 in one example is a high-bypass geared aircraft engine. In a further example, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10). In another example, the bypass ratio between about ten (10) and about eighteen (18). In yet another example, the bypass ratio is less than about nine (9), for example, about seven (7) to about nine (9). In one example, the geared architecture 48 is an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3 and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about ten (10:1), the fan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 44, and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five (5:1). Low pressure turbine 46 pressure ratio is pressure measured prior to inlet of low pressure turbine 46 as related to the pressure at the outlet of the low pressure turbine 46 prior to an exhaust nozzle. The geared architecture 48 may be an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.
The example gas turbine engine includes the fan 42 that comprises in one non-limiting embodiment less than about twenty-six (26) fan blades. In another non-limiting embodiment, the fan section 22 includes less than about twenty (20) fan blades. Moreover, in one disclosed embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes no more than about six (6) turbine rotors schematically indicated at 34. In another non-limiting example embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes about three (3) turbine rotors. A ratio between the number of fan blades 42 and the number of low pressure turbine rotors is between about 3.3 and about 8.6. The example low pressure turbine 46 provides the driving power to rotate the fan section 22 and therefore the relationship between the number of turbine rotors 34 in the low pressure turbine 46 and the number of blades 42 in the fan section 22 disclose an example gas turbine engine 20 with increased power transfer efficiency.
A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 22 of the engine 20 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet. The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft, with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (‘TSFC’)”—is the industry standard parameter of lbm of fuel being burned divided by lbf of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point. “Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without a Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.55. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is less than or equal to about 1.7, for example, from about 1.2 to about 1.7. In another example, the low fan pressure ratio is less than or equal to about 1.5, for example, from about 1.4 to about 1.5, and, for example, about 1.45. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is from 1.1 to 1.45. “Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tram °R)/(518.7°R)]0.5. The “Low corrected fan tip speed” as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1200 ft/second.
Referring to
The root 62 is received in a correspondingly shaped slot in the fan hub 60. The airfoil 64 extends radially outward of the platform, which provides the inner flow path. The platform may be integral with the fan blade or separately secured to the fan hub, for example. A spinner 66 is supported relative to the fan hub 60 to provide an aerodynamic inner flow path into the fan section 22.
The airfoil 64 has an exterior surface 76 providing a contour that extends from a leading edge 68 aftward in a chord-wise direction H to a trailing edge 70, as shown in
The exterior surface 76 of the airfoil 64 generates lift based upon its geometry and directs flow along the core flow path C and the bypass flow path B. The fan blade 42 may be constructed from a composite material, or an aluminum alloy or titanium alloy, or a combination of one or more of these. Abrasion-resistant coatings or other protective coatings may be applied to the fan blade 42. In one example, the fan blade 42 is a composite that has a swept configuration.
One characteristic of fan blade performance relates to the fan blade's tangential stacking offset (Y direction) relative to a particular span position (R direction). Referring to
The YCG corresponds to the location of the center of gravity, assuming a homogeneous material, for a particular section at a given span location relative to a reference point 80 in the Y direction, as shown in
The tangential stacking offset Yd may be expressed as a tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd, where Rd is the radial distance from hub's rotational axis X to the tip of the leading edge 68. Rd as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is about 35-37 inches (0.89-0.94 meters). In another non-limiting embodiment Rd is about 27-29 inches (0.69-0.74 meters). In another non-limiting embodiment Rd is about 39-41 inches (0.99-1.04 meters). One example prior art airfoil has an Rd of about 57-59 inches (1.45-1.50 meters).
Example relationships between the tangential stacking offset and the span position (AVERAGE SPAN %), which is the average of the radial position at the leading and trailing edges 68, 70. are shown in
The prior art curve includes a first critical point around 18% span that has an Rd/Yd ratio of 81-84. A second critical point around 35% span has an Rd/Yd ratio of around 114-118, and a third critical point around 95% has an Rd/Yd ratio of around 12.7-13.1.
Each relationship is at least a third order polynomial having at least one positive slope and one negative slope. Each inventive curve includes at least two critical points, which are represented by an asterisk. A positive slope is where the airfoil leans toward the suction side, and a negative slope is where the airfoil leans toward the pressure side. Relationships are depicted in which the curves have an initial slope starting at the 0% span position that is either zero or positive. Each curve has the 0% span position offset from the zero tangential stacking offset, or reference point.
Referring to curve A, the curve has an initial positive slope to a critical point 90 in the range of 5-15% span. The curve begins with a positive tangential stacking offset. At the 5-15% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of 195 to 205. The curve has a negative slope from the critical point 90 to an critical point 92, which is in the range of 35-45% span. At the 35-45% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of 1950 to 2050. At the 100% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of 13 to 15. The curve does not cross the zero tangential stacking offset.
Referring to curve B, the curve has an initial positive slope to a critical point 94 in the range of 5-15% span. The curve begins with a negative tangential stacking offset. At the 5-15% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of −175 to −185. The curve has a negative slope from the critical point 94 to a critical point 96, which is in the range of 35-45% span. At the 35-45% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of −70 to −74. The curve crosses the zero tangential stacking offset at location 98 in the range of 60-70% span. At the 100% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of 19 to 21.
Referring to curve C, the curve has an initial zero slope and begins with a positive tangential stacking offset. The curve has a negative slope that crosses the zero tangential stacking offset at location 104 after a critical point in the range of 5-15% and has a critical point 100 in the range of 35-45% span. At the 5-15% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of −540 to −580. At the 35-45% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of −108 to −116. The curve has a positive slope from the critical point 100 to a critical point 102, which is in the range of 85-95% span. The curve crosses the zero tangential stacking offset in the range of 50-60% span. At the 85-95% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of 23 to 26. At the 100% span location, the tangential stacking offset ratio Rd/Yd is in the range of 27 to 29.
The tangential stacking offset in a hot, running condition along the span of the airfoils 64 relate to the contour of the airfoil and provide necessary fan operation in cruise at the lower, preferential speeds enabled by the geared architecture 48 in order to enhance aerodynamic functionality and thermal efficiency. As used herein, the hot, running condition is the condition during cruise of the gas turbine engine 20. For example, the tangential stacking offsets in the hot, running condition can be determined in a known manner using numerical analysis, such as finite element analysis.
It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom. Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
Although the different examples have specific components shown in the illustrations, embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from one of the examples in combination with features or components from another one of the examples.
Although an example embodiment has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/626,167 filed Feb. 19, 2015 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/941,698, which was filed on Feb. 19, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2714499 | Warner | Aug 1955 | A |
2746672 | Doll, Jr. | May 1956 | A |
3287906 | McCormick | Nov 1966 | A |
3754484 | Roberts | Aug 1973 | A |
3892358 | Gisslen | Jul 1975 | A |
3905191 | Matto | Sep 1975 | A |
4012172 | Schwaar | Mar 1977 | A |
4130872 | Harloff | Dec 1978 | A |
4284388 | Szewalski | Aug 1981 | A |
4682935 | Martin | Jul 1987 | A |
4900230 | Patel | Feb 1990 | A |
5088892 | Weingold | Feb 1992 | A |
5167489 | Wadia et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192190 | Ferleger | Mar 1993 | A |
5211703 | Ferleger | May 1993 | A |
5221181 | Ferleger | Jun 1993 | A |
5277549 | Chen | Jan 1994 | A |
5433674 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447411 | Curley et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5524341 | Ferleger | Jun 1996 | A |
5524847 | Brodell et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5778659 | Duesler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785498 | Quinn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5857836 | Stickler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915917 | Eveker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5975841 | Lindemuth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6071077 | Rowlands | Jun 2000 | A |
6195983 | Wadia | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223616 | Sheridan | May 2001 | B1 |
6318070 | Rey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331100 | Liu | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6565334 | Bradbury | May 2003 | B1 |
6814541 | Evans et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7021042 | Law | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7591754 | Duong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7824305 | Duong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7926260 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8087885 | Suciu | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8167548 | Greim | May 2012 | B2 |
8177496 | Wilson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8205432 | Sheridan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8382438 | Guemmer | Feb 2013 | B2 |
9650965 | Topol | May 2017 | B2 |
20020141863 | Liu | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030086788 | Chandraker | May 2003 | A1 |
20050021454 | Doloresco et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060210395 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222488 | Fessou | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080107538 | Bois et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148564 | Burton et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226454 | Decker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090226322 | Clemen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257866 | Greim | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274554 | Guemmer | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090304518 | Kodama et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054946 | Orosa et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100148396 | Xie et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100331139 | McCune | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110081252 | Li | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135482 | Nash et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150660 | Micheli | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110286850 | Micheli et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286856 | Micheli | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120237344 | Wood et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243975 | Breeze-Stringfellow | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130008170 | Gallagher et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130089415 | Brown | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130141935 | Huang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130189117 | Baltas et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130192266 | Houston | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224040 | Straccia | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266451 | Pesteil et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340406 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140248155 | Merville | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140341749 | Perrot et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150017012 | Pouzadoux et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150118059 | Perrot | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150354367 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160195104 | Cellier | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1903642 | Aug 1970 | DE |
1903642 | Aug 1970 | DE |
102008055824 | May 2009 | DE |
0082100 | Jun 1983 | EP |
0251978 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0661413 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0745755 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0774567 | May 1997 | EP |
1074700 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1098092 | May 2001 | EP |
1106835 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1106836 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1106836 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1111188 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1505302 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1505302 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1508669 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1524405 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1582695 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1939399 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2075408 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2133573 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2226468 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2543818 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2631491 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2995771 | Mar 2016 | EP |
1516041 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2041090 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2170868 | Aug 1986 | GB |
2431697 | May 2007 | GB |
H08165999 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2014015858 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2007038674 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008109036 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2014066503 | May 2014 | WO |
2015126449 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015126774 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 14883154.8. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2017 for European Application No. 14883117.5. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 15752432.3. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 26, 2017 for European Application No. 15793425.8. |
Partial EP Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2017 for European Application No. 15793193.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2017 for European Application No. 15752887.8. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2017 for European Application No. 14883515.0. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2017 for European Application No. 15752124.6. |
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2017 for European Application No. 15751498.5. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15751454.8. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15793323.5. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15796827.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15792194.1. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15751738.4. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15752593.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 14883036.7. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 22, 2017 for European Application No. 15793112.2. |
EP Search Report dated Feb. 20, 2017 for European Application No. 15793268.2. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052282, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016554, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052434, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052516, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052447, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052080, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032 dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561 dated Sep. 1, 2016. |
NASA Conference Publication. Quiet, powered-lift propulsion. Cleveland, Ohio. Nov. 14-15, 1978. |
“Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications”, Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005). |
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8), p. 32. |
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710. |
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883. |
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104. |
Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006. |
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida. |
Agarwal, B.D and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York. |
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 108(8), 65-67. |
Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe and science technology. Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis. |
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998. |
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.C., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in NASA's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007. |
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modern Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case. |
Hall, C.A. and Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, 479-487. |
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37(20), 1821-1837. |
Brennan, P.J. and Kroliczek, E.J. (1979). Heat pipe design handbook. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration by B & K Engineering, Inc. Jun. 1979. |
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. |
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. |
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233. |
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987. |
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report. NASA/CR-159473. |
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189. |
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978. |
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995. |
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. |
Lau, K., Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436. |
Shorter Oxford English dictionary, 6th Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888. |
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. |
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25. |
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. |
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers. |
Wendus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport. NASA/CR-2003-212467. |
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M. The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126. |
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982. |
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876. |
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. |
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas, Apr. 12-15, 1983. |
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972. |
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012. |
Ivchenko-Progress Al-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007. |
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009. |
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010. |
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010. |
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016083, dated Jul. 21, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016018, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015016091, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016584, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015575, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, dated Nov. 24, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14882896.5 dated Oct. 19, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14883503.6 dated Nov. 6, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15752013.1 dated Dec. 5, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15751617.0 dated Dec. 5, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15793127.0 dated Dec. 1, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15792720.3 dated Oct. 17, 2017. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15792720.3 dated Jan. 31, 2018. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14883170.4 dated Apr. 19, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160032728 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61941698 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14626167 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 14836577 | US |