This disclosure relates generally to an airfoil for gas turbine engines, and more particularly to a fan or compressor blade's profile, including leading and trailing edges and chord length, projected onto a series of planes.
A turbine engine such as a gas turbine engine typically includes a fan section, a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section. Air entering the compressor section is compressed and delivered into the combustor section where it is mixed with fuel and ignited to generate a high-speed exhaust gas flow. The high-speed exhaust gas flow expands through the turbine section to drive the compressor and the fan section. The compressor section typically includes low and high pressure compressors, and the turbine section includes low and high pressure turbines.
The propulsive efficiency of a gas turbine engine depends on many different factors, such as the design of the engine and the resulting performance debits on the fan that propels the engine. As an example, the fan may rotate at a high rate of speed such that air passes over the fan airfoils at transonic or supersonic speeds. The fast-moving air creates flow discontinuities or shocks that result in irreversible propulsive losses. Additionally, physical interaction between the fan and the air causes downstream turbulence and further losses. Although some basic principles behind such losses are understood, identifying and changing appropriate design factors to reduce such losses for a given engine architecture has proven to be a complex and elusive task.
In one exemplary embodiment, a gas turbine engine includes a combustion section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section. A fan section is arranged upstream from the compressor section. An airfoil is arranged in one of the fan section, the compressor section and the turbine section. The airfoil includes pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position at an inner flow path location to a 100% span position at an airfoil tip. The airfoil has a maximum chord length projection that is not in an axial view.
In a further embodiment of the above engine, the airfoil has a maximum chord length projection in a 20° to 60° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum chord length projection is in a 30° to 50° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum chord length projection is in an about 40° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum chord length projection in the about 40° view is in a range of 60% to 70% span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum chord length projection is in an about 50° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum chord length projection in the about 50° view is at the 100% span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum chord length projection is in an about 30° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the airfoil is a fan blade in the fan section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the fan blade is a composite blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the composite blade is a swept blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the fan section has a fan pressure ratio of less than or equal to about 1.5.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the engine has a bypass ratio of greater than 6.
In one exemplary embodiment, a gas turbine engine includes a combustion section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section. A fan section is arranged upstream from the compressor section. An airfoil is arranged in one of the fan section, the compressor section and the turbine section. The airfoil includes pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position at an inner flow path location to a 100% span position at an airfoil tip. The airfoil has a maximum leading edge projection in a 20° to 40° view.
In a further embodiment of the above engine, the maximum leading edge projection is in an about 30° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum leading edge projection is in a range of 35% to 55% span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the airfoil is a fan blade in the fan section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the fan blade is a composite blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the composite blade is a swept blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the fan section has a fan pressure ratio of less than or equal to about 1.5.
In one exemplary embodiment, a gas turbine engine includes a combustion section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section. A fan section is arranged upstream from the compressor section. An airfoil is arranged in one of the fan section, the compressor section and the turbine section. The airfoil includes pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position at an inner flow path location to a 100% span position at an airfoil tip. The airfoil has a maximum trailing edge projection in a 50° to 70° view.
In a further embodiment of the above engine, the maximum trailing edge projection is at the 100% span position.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum trailing edge projection is in about 60° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the maximum trailing edge projection is in about 50° view.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the airfoil is a fan blade in the fan section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the fan blade is a composite blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the composite blade is a swept blade.
In a further embodiment of any of the above engines, the fan section has a fan pressure ratio of less than or equal to about 1.5.
In one exemplary embodiment, a gas turbine engine includes a combustor section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section. A fan section has an array of twenty-six or fewer fan blades. The fan section has a fan pressure ratio of less than 1.55. A geared architecture couples the fan section to the turbine section or the compressor section. The fan blades include an airfoil having pressure and suction sides. The airfoil extends in a radial direction from a 0% span position at an inner flow path location to a 100% span position at an airfoil tip. The airfoil has a maximum chord length projection in a 20° to 60° view the airfoil has a maximum leading edge projection in a 20° to 40° view and the airfoil has a maximum trailing edge projection in a 50° to 70° view.
The disclosure can be further understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The embodiments, examples and alternatives of the preceding paragraphs, the claims, or the following description and drawings, including any of their various aspects or respective individual features, may be taken independently or in any combination. Features described in connection with one embodiment are applicable to all embodiments, unless such features are incompatible.
The exemplary engine 20 generally includes a low speed spool 30 and a high speed spool 32 mounted for rotation about an engine central longitudinal axis X relative to an engine static structure 36 via several bearing systems 38. It should be understood that various bearing systems 38 at various locations may alternatively or additionally be provided, and the location of bearing systems 38 may be varied as appropriate to the application.
The low speed spool 30 generally includes an inner shaft 40 that interconnects a fan 42, a first (or low) pressure compressor 44 and a first (or low) pressure turbine 46. The inner shaft 40 is connected to the fan 42 through a speed change mechanism, which in exemplary gas turbine engine 20 is illustrated as a geared architecture 48 to drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. The high speed spool 32 includes an outer shaft 50 that interconnects a second (or high) pressure compressor 52 and a second (or high) pressure turbine 54. A combustor 56 is arranged in exemplary gas turbine 20 between the high pressure compressor 52 and the high pressure turbine 54. A mid-turbine frame 57 of the engine static structure 36 is arranged generally between the high pressure turbine 54 and the low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 further supports bearing systems 38 in the turbine section 28. The inner shaft 40 and the outer shaft 50 are concentric and rotate via bearing systems 38 about the engine central longitudinal axis X which is collinear with their longitudinal axes.
The core airflow is compressed by the low pressure compressor 44 then the high pressure compressor 52, mixed and burned with fuel in the combustor 56, then expanded over the high pressure turbine 54 and low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 includes airfoils 59 which are in the core airflow path C. The turbines 46, 54 rotationally drive the respective low speed spool 30 and high speed spool 32 in response to the expansion. It will be appreciated that each of the positions of the fan section 22, compressor section 24, combustor section 26, turbine section 28, and fan drive gear system 48 may be varied. For example, gear system 48 may be located aft of combustor section 26 or even aft of turbine section 28, and fan section 22 may be positioned forward or aft of the location of gear system 48.
The engine 20 in one example is a high-bypass geared aircraft engine. In a further example, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10). In another example, the bypass ratio between about ten (10) and about eighteen (18). In yet another example, the bypass ratio is less than about nine (9), for example, about seven (7) to about nine (9). In one example, the geared architecture 48 is an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3 and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about ten (10:1), the fan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 44, and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five (5:1). Low pressure turbine 46 pressure ratio is pressure measured prior to inlet of low pressure turbine 46 as related to the pressure at the outlet of the low pressure turbine 46 prior to an exhaust nozzle. The geared architecture 48 may be an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.
The example gas turbine engine includes the fan 42 that comprises in one non-limiting embodiment less than about twenty-six (26) fan blades. In another non-limiting embodiment, the fan section 22 includes less than about twenty (20) fan blades. Moreover, in one disclosed embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes no more than about six (6) turbine rotors schematically indicated at 34. In another non-limiting example embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes about three (3) turbine rotors. A ratio between the number of fan blades 42 and the number of low pressure turbine rotors is between about 3.3 and about 8.6. The example low pressure turbine 46 provides the driving power to rotate the fan section 22 and therefore the relationship between the number of turbine rotors 34 in the low pressure turbine 46 and the number of blades 42 in the fan section 22 disclose an example gas turbine engine 20 with increased power transfer efficiency.
A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 22 of the engine 20 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet. The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft, with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (‘TSFC’)”—is the industry standard parameter of lbm of fuel being burned divided by lbf of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point. “Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without a Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.55. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is less than or equal to about 1.7, for example, from about 1.2 to about 1.7. In another example, the low fan pressure ratio is less than or equal to about 1.5, for example, from about 1.4 to about 1.5, and, for example, about 1.45. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is from 1.1 to 1.45. “Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5. The “Low corrected fan tip speed” as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1150 ft/second.
Referring to
The root 62 is received in a correspondingly shaped slot in the fan hub 60. The airfoil 64 extends radially outward of the platform, which provides the inner flow path. The platform may be integral with the fan blade or separately secured to the fan hub, for example. A spinner 66 is supported relative to the fan hub 60 to provide an aerodynamic inner flow path into the fan section 22.
The airfoil 64 has an exterior surface 76 providing a contour that extends from a leading edge 68 aftward in a chord-wise direction H to a trailing edge 70, as shown in
The exterior surface 76 of the airfoil 64 generates lift based upon its geometry and directs flow along the core flow path C. The fan blade 42 may be constructed from a composite material, or an aluminum alloy or titanium alloy, or a combination of one or more of these. Abrasion-resistant coatings or other protective coatings may be applied to the fan blade 42. In one example, the fan blade 42 is a composite that has a swept configuration.
One characteristic of fan blade performance relates to the fan blade's leading and trailing edge locations and chord length relative to a particular span position (R direction) as projected onto a series of planes defined between the axial and tangential directions. In addition to varying with span, the projections vary between a hot, running condition and a cold, static (“on the bench”) condition.
Referring to
Rd is the radial distance from hub's rotational axis X to the tip of the leading edge 68. Rd as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is about 35-37 inches (0.89-0.94 meters). In another non-limiting embodiment Rd is about 27-29 inches (0.69-0.74 meters). In another non-limiting embodiment Rd is about 39-41 inches (0.99-1.04 meters).
Referring to
Example projections for the chord length relative to the span positions are shown in
The airfoil has a maximum chord length projection that is not in an axial view, for example, in a 20° to 60° view. Said another way, the chord when viewed from 20° to 60° appears to be greater in length than when viewed at other projections from 0° to 90°. In one example, the maximum chord length projection is in a 30° to 50° view. Referring to
The airfoil has a maximum leading edge projection in a 20° to 40° view. Referring to
The airfoil has a maximum trailing edge projection in a 50° to 70° view. Referring to
The leading and trailing edges and chord length, as projected onto a series of planes in a hot, running condition along the span of the airfoil 64, relate to the contour of the airfoil and provide necessary fan operation in cruise at the lower, preferential speeds enabled by the geared architecture 48 in ordered to enhance aerodynamic functionality and thermal efficiency. As used herein, the hot, running condition is the condition during cruise of the gas turbine engine 20. For example, the leading and trailing edges and chord length as projected onto a series of planes in the hot, running condition can be determined in a known manner using numerical analysis, such as finite element analysis.
It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom. Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
Although the different examples have specific components shown in the illustrations, embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from one of the examples in combination with features or components from another one of the examples.
Although an example embodiment has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/941,871 filed on Feb. 19, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2934259 | Hausmann | Apr 1960 | A |
3287906 | McCormick | Nov 1966 | A |
3747343 | Rosen | Jul 1973 | A |
3754484 | Roberts | Aug 1973 | A |
3892358 | Gisslen | Jul 1975 | A |
3905191 | Matto | Sep 1975 | A |
4012172 | Schwaar et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4130872 | Haloff | Dec 1978 | A |
4431376 | Lubenstein et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4682935 | Martin | Jul 1987 | A |
4826400 | Gregory | May 1989 | A |
4900230 | Patel | Feb 1990 | A |
5088892 | Weingold | Feb 1992 | A |
5141400 | Murphy et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5167489 | Wadia et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5277549 | Chen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5433674 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443367 | Samit et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447411 | Curley et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5524847 | Brodell et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5525038 | Sharma et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5624234 | Neely et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642985 | Spear et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5725354 | Wadia et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5778659 | Duesler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5857836 | Stickler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915917 | Eveker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5975841 | Lindemuth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6059532 | Chen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079948 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6223616 | Sheridan | May 2001 | B1 |
6299412 | Wood et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312219 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318070 | Rey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328533 | Decker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331100 | Lui | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341942 | Chou et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6814541 | Evans et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6899526 | Doloresco et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6994524 | Owen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021042 | Law | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7204676 | Dutton et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7374403 | Decker et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396205 | Dube et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7476086 | Wadia et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497664 | Walter et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7547186 | Schuster et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7591754 | Duong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7785075 | Botrel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806653 | Burton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824305 | Duong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7926260 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7967571 | Wood et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997872 | Wilson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997882 | Shulver | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8087885 | Suciu | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8147207 | Orosa et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167567 | Kirchner et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8205432 | Sheridan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246292 | Morin et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
RE43710 | Spear et al. | Oct 2012 | E |
8393870 | Nash et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8464426 | Kirchner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20030086788 | Chandraker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163983 | Seda et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040091353 | Shahpar et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050031454 | Doloresco et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050169761 | Dube et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050254956 | Dutton et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060163983 | Wu | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060210395 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228206 | Decker | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070041841 | Walter et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070160478 | Jarrah et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070201983 | Arinci et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070243068 | Wadia | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080101959 | McRae et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120839 | Schilling | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148564 | Burton et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226454 | Decker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090226322 | Clemen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090274554 | Guemmer | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090304518 | Kodama et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317227 | Grover et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054946 | Orosa et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100148396 | Xie et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100232970 | Murooka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254797 | Grover et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260609 | Wood et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100331139 | McCune | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110081252 | Li | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135482 | Nash et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206527 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225979 | Hoeger et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110268578 | Praisner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286850 | Micheli et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120057982 | O'Hearn et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120195767 | Gervais et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237344 | Wood et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243975 | Breeze-Stringfellow et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244005 | Breeze-Stringfellow et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130008170 | Gallagher et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022473 | Tran | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130089415 | Brown et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130149108 | Webster | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164488 | Wood et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130189117 | Baltas et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130202403 | Morin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219922 | Gilson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224040 | Straccia | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266451 | Pesteil et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340406 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140030060 | Magowan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140248155 | Merville et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150354367 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0801230 | May 2009 | EP |
2226468 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2535527 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2543818 | Jan 2013 | EP |
1516041 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2041090 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2007038674 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Smith, L.,Yeh,H.,(1963).Sweep and Dihedral Effects in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery;Journal of Basic Engineering; Sep. 1963.pp. 401-416. |
Engine Specifications. Engine Alliance GP7200—The Engine for the A380. Retrieved Feb. 19, 2015 from http://www.enginealliance.com/engine—specifications.html. |
Aerodynamic Design technique for Optimizing Fan Blade Spacing, Rogalsky et all., Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Society of Canada, 1999. |
Turbine Design and Application. vol. 2. NASA, 1973. |
Analytical Parametric Investigation of Low Pressure Ration Fan, NASA, 1973 Metzger et al. |
Oyanna et al., Multiobjective Optimization of a Multi-Stage Compressor Using Evolutionary Algorithm, NASA, 2002, AIAA 2002-3535 pp. 1-11. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016187, mailed May 20, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016011, mailed May 21, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016078, mailed May 29, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016154, mailed May 22, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016086, mailed May 26, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016554, mailed May 26, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015554, mailed May 21, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052325, mailed May 29, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016378, mailed May 29, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052293, mailed May 29, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052516, mailed Jun. 10, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016018, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015016091, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016584, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015575, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, mailed Nov. 24, 2015. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016083, mailed Jul. 21, 2015. |
McMillian, A. (2008) Material development for fan blade containment casing. Abstract. p. 1. Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006. |
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida. pp. 145-153. |
Agarwal, B.D and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York. pp. 1-30, 50-51, 56-58, 60-61, 64-71, 87-89, 324-329, 436-437. |
Carney, K., Pereira, M. Revilock, and Matheny, P. (2003). Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. pp. 1-10. |
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers,108(8), 65-67. |
Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe and science technology. Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-60. |
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998. |
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.C., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in NASA's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007. |
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modern Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case pp. 1-4. |
Hall, C.A. and Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, 479-487. |
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37(20), 1821-1837. |
Brennan, P.J. and Kroliczek, E.J. (1979). Heat pipe design handbook. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration by B & K Engineering, Inc. Jun. 1979. pp. 1-348. |
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 1-24. |
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. p. 11. |
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233. pp. 1-31. |
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987. pp. 1-23. |
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report NASA/CR-159473 pp. 1-289. |
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189. |
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 465. |
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978. pp. 39-43. |
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995. pp. 3-9. |
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. pp. 341-344. |
Lau, K., Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436. |
Shorter Oxford English dictionary, fith Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888. |
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 145, 355-358. |
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25. |
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 8-15. |
Pyrograf-III Carbon Nanofiber. Product guide. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2015 from: http://pyrografproducts.com/Merchant5/merchant.mvc?Screen=cp—nanofiber. |
Nanocor Technical Data for Epoxy Nanocomposites using Nanomer 1.30E Nanoclay. Nnacor, Inc. Oct. 2004. |
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers. pp. 187-216. |
Endus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport. NASA/CR-2003-212467. pp. 1-37. |
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M. The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994.pp. 1-7. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126. |
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982. |
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010. pp. 1-8. |
Gliebe, P.R. and Janardan, B.A. (2003). Ultra-high bypass engine aeroacoustic study. NASA/CR-2003-21252. GE Aircraft Engines, Cincinnati, Ohio. Oct. 2003. pp. 1-103. |
Moxon, J. How to save fuel in tomorrow's engines. Flight International. Jul. 30, 1983. 3873(124). pp. 272-273. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876. |
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. pp. 1-9. |
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 12-15, 1983. pp. 1-12. |
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972. pp. 1-12. |
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. pp. 510-512. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012. |
Ivchenko-Progress AI-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007. |
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009. |
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010. |
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010. |
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012. |
NASA Conference Publication. Quiet, powered-lift propulsion. Cleveland, Ohio. Nov. 14-15, 1978. pp. 1-420. |
“Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications”, Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005). |
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8). Start p. 32. |
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710. pp. 1-13. |
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883. pp. 1-27. |
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052282, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016554, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052434, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052516, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052447, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052080, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032 mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561 mailed Sep. 1, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150233323 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61941871 | Feb 2014 | US |