Gas turbine engine airfoil

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10570915
  • Patent Number
    10,570,915
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 16, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 25, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A compressor airfoil of a turbine engine having a geared architecture includes pressure and suction sides that extend in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position. The airfoil has a relationship between a camber angle and span position that defines a curve with a decreasing camber angle from 80% span to 100% span.
Description
BACKGROUND

This disclosure relates to gas turbine engine airfoils. More particularly the disclosure relates to airfoil camber in, for example, a gas turbine engine compressor.


A turbine engine such as a gas turbine engine typically includes a fan section, a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section. Air entering the compressor section is compressed and delivered into the combustor section where it is mixed with fuel and ignited to generate a high-speed exhaust gas flow. The high-speed exhaust gas flow expands through the turbine section to drive the compressor and the fan section. The compressor section typically includes at least low and high pressure compressors, and the turbine section includes at least low and high pressure turbines.


Direct drive gas turbine engines include a fan section that is driven directly by one of the turbine shafts. Rotor blades in the fan section and a low pressure compressor of the compressor section of direct drive engines rotate in the same direction.


Gas turbine engines have been proposed in which a geared architecture is arranged between the fan section and at least some turbines in the turbine section. The geared architecture enables the associated compressor of the compressor section to be driven at much higher rotational speeds, improving overall efficiency of the engine. The propulsive efficiency of a gas turbine engine depends on many different factors, such as the design of the engine and the resulting performance debits on the fan that propels the engine and the compressor section downstream from the fan. Physical interaction between the fan and the air causes downstream turbulence and further losses. Although some basic principles behind such losses are understood, identifying and changing appropriate design factors to reduce such losses for a given engine architecture has proven to be a complex and elusive task.


Prior compressor airfoil geometries may not be suitable for the compressor section of gas turbine engines using a geared architecture, since the significantly different speeds of the compressor changes the desired aerodynamics of the airfoils within the compressor section. Counter-rotating fan and compressor blades, which may be used in geared architecture engines, also present design challenges.


SUMMARY

In one exemplary embodiment, a compressor airfoil of a turbine engine having a geared architecture includes pressure and suction sides that extends in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position. The airfoil has a relationship between a camber angle and span position that defines a curve with a decreasing camber angle from 80% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of the above, the curve has a decreasing camber angle from 60% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is generally linear from 0% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is less than 20° from 80% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is less than 20° from 60% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is less than 20° from 40% span to 100% span.


In another exemplary embodiment, a gas turbine engine includes a combustor section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section. A fan section has an array of twenty-six or fewer fan blades. The fan section has a low fan pressure ratio of less than 1.55. A geared architecture couples the fan section to the turbine section or the compressor section. An airfoil is arranged in the compressor section and includes pressure and suction sides that extend in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position. The airfoil has a relationship between a camber angle and span position that defines a curve with a decreasing camber angle from 80% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the compressor section includes at least a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor. The high pressure compressor is arranged immediately upstream of the combustor section.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the airfoil is provided in a compressor outside the high pressure compressor.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the low pressure compressor is counter-rotating relative to the fan blades.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the gas turbine engine is a two-spool configuration.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the low pressure compressor is immediately downstream from the fan section.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the airfoil is rotatable relative to an engine static structure.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the curve has a decreasing camber angle from 60% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is generally linear from 0% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is less than 20° from 80% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is less than 20° from 60% span to 100% span.


In a further embodiment of any of the above, the camber angle is less than 20° from 40% span to 100% span.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure can be further understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a gas turbine engine embodiment with a geared architecture.



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a low pressure compressor section of the gas turbine engine of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of airfoil span positions.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a cross-section of an airfoil sectioned at a particular span position and depicting directional indicators.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of an airfoil depicting camber, or camber angle of the airfoil.



FIG. 6 graphically depicts curves for several example airfoil camber angles relative to span, including two prior art curves and several inventive curves according to this disclosure.





The embodiments, examples and alternatives of the preceding paragraphs, the claims, or the following description and drawings, including any of their various aspects or respective individual features, may be taken independently or in any combination. Features described in connection with one embodiment are applicable to all embodiments, unless such features are incompatible.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a gas turbine engine 20. The gas turbine engine 20 is disclosed herein as a two-spool turbofan that generally incorporates a fan section 22, a compressor section 24, a combustor section 26 and a turbine section 28. Alternative engines might include an augmenter section (not shown) among other systems or features. The fan section 22 drives air along a bypass flow path B in a bypass duct defined within a nacelle 15, while the compressor section 24 drives air along a core flow path C for compression and communication into the combustor section 26 then expansion through the turbine section 28. Although depicted as a two-spool turbofan gas turbine engine in the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, it should be understood that the concepts described herein are not limited to use with two-spool turbofans as the teachings may be applied to other types of turbine engines including three-spool architectures. That is, the disclosed airfoils may be used for engine configurations such as, for example, direct fan drives, or two- or three-spool engines with a speed change mechanism coupling the fan with a compressor or a turbine sections.


The exemplary engine 20 generally includes a low speed spool 30 and a high speed spool 32 mounted for rotation about an engine central longitudinal axis X relative to an engine static structure 36 via several bearing systems 38. It should be understood that various bearing systems 38 at various locations may alternatively or additionally be provided, and the location of bearing systems 38 may be varied as appropriate to the application.


The low speed spool 30 generally includes an inner shaft 40 that interconnects a fan 42, a first (or low) pressure compressor 44 and a first (or low) pressure turbine 46. The inner shaft 40 is connected to the fan 42 through a speed change mechanism, which in exemplary gas turbine engine 20 is illustrated as a geared architecture 48 to drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. The high speed spool 32 includes an outer shaft 50 that interconnects a second (or high) pressure compressor 52 and a second (or high) pressure turbine 54. A combustor 56 is arranged in exemplary gas turbine 20 between the high pressure compressor 52 and the high pressure turbine 54. A mid-turbine frame 57 of the engine static structure 36 is arranged generally between the high pressure turbine 54 and the low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 further supports bearing systems 38 in the turbine section 28. The inner shaft 40 and the outer shaft 50 are concentric and rotate via bearing systems 38 about the engine central longitudinal axis X which is collinear with their longitudinal axes.


The core airflow is compressed by the low pressure compressor 44 then the high pressure compressor 52, mixed and burned with fuel in the combustor 56, then expanded over the high pressure turbine 54 and low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 includes airfoils 59 which are in the core airflow path C. The turbines 46, 54 rotationally drive the respective low speed spool 30 and high speed spool 32 in response to the expansion. It will be appreciated that each of the positions of the fan section 22, compressor section 24, combustor section 26, turbine section 28, and fan drive gear system 48 may be varied. For example, gear system 48 may be located aft of combustor section 26 or even aft of turbine section 28, and fan section 22 may be positioned forward or aft of the location of gear system 48.


The engine 20 in one example is a high-bypass geared aircraft engine. In a further example, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10), the geared architecture 48 is an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3 and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about ten (10:1), the fan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 44, and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five (5:1). Low pressure turbine 46 pressure ratio is pressure measured prior to inlet of low pressure turbine 46 as related to the pressure at the outlet of the low pressure turbine 46 prior to an exhaust nozzle. The geared architecture 48 may be an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.


The example gas turbine engine includes the fan 42 that comprises in one non-limiting embodiment less than about twenty-six (26) fan blades. In another non-limiting embodiment, the fan section 22 includes less than about twenty (20) fan blades. Moreover, in one disclosed embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes no more than about six (6) turbine rotors schematically indicated at 34. In another non-limiting example embodiment the low pressure turbine 46 includes about three (3) turbine rotors. A ratio between the number of fan blades 42 and the number of low pressure turbine rotors is between about 3.3 and about 8.6. The example low pressure turbine 46 provides the driving power to rotate the fan section 22 and therefore the relationship between the number of turbine rotors 34 in the low pressure turbine 46 and the number of blades 42 in the fan section 22 disclose an example gas turbine engine 20 with increased power transfer efficiency.


A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 22 of the engine 20 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet (10,668 meters). The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft (10,668 meters), with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (“TSFC”)”—is the industry standard parameter of lbm of fuel being burned divided by lbf of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point. “Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without a Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.55. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is less than about 1.45. In another non-limiting embodiment the low fan pressure ratio is from 1.1 to 1.45. “Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5. The “Low corrected fan tip speed” as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1200 ft/second (365.8 meters/second).


Referring to FIG. 2, which schematically illustrates an example low pressure compressor (LPC) 44, a variable inlet guide vane (IGV) is arranged downstream from a fan exit stator (FES). The figure is highly schematic, and the geometry and orientation of various features may be other than shown. An actuator driven by a controller actuates the IGV about their respective axes. Multiple airfoils are arranged downstream from the IGV. The airfoils include alternating stages of rotors (ROTOR1, ROTOR2, ROTOR5, ROTOR4) and stators (STATOR1, STATOR2, STATOR5, STATOR4). In the example shown in FIG. 2, the LPC includes four rotors alternating with four stators. However, in another example, a different number of rotors and a different number of stators may be used. Moreover, the IGV and stator stages may all be variable, fixed or a combination thereof.


The disclosed airfoils may be used in a low pressure compressor of a two spool engine or in portions of other compressor configurations, such as low, intermediate and/or high pressure areas of a three spool engine. However, it should be understood that any of the disclosed airfoils may be used for blades or vanes, and in any of the compressor section, turbine section and fan section.


Referring to FIG. 3, span positions on an airfoil 64 are schematically illustrated from 0% to 100% in 10% increments (i.e., 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100). Each section at a given span position is provided by a conical cut that corresponds to the shape of the core flow path, as shown by the large dashed lines. In the case of an airfoil with an integral platform, the 0% span position corresponds to the radially innermost location where the airfoil meets the fillet joining the airfoil to the inner platform. In the case of an airfoil without an integral platform, the 0% span position corresponds to the radially innermost location where the discrete platform meets the exterior surface of the airfoil. For airfoils having no outer platform, such as blades, the 100% span position corresponds to the tip 66. For airfoils having no platform at the inner diameter, such as cantilevered stators, the 0% span position corresponds to the inner diameter location of the airfoil. For stators, the 100% span position corresponds to the outermost location where the airfoil meets the fillet joining the airfoil to the outer platform.


Airfoils in each stage of the LPC are specifically designed radially from an inner airfoil location (0% span) to an outer airfoil location (100% span) and along circumferentially opposite pressure and suction sides 72, 74 extending in chord between a leading and trailing edges 68, 70 (see FIG. 4). Each airfoil is specifically twisted with a corresponding stagger angle and bent with specific sweep and/or dihedral angles along the airfoil. Airfoil geometric shapes, stacking offsets, chord profiles, stagger angles, sweep and dihedral angles, among other associated features, are incorporated individually or collectively to improve characteristics such as aerodynamic efficiency, structural integrity, and vibration mitigation, for example, in a gas turbine engine with a geared architecture in view of the higher LPC rotational speeds.


The airfoil 64 has an exterior surface 76 providing a contour that extends from a leading edge 68 generally aftward in a chord-wise direction H to a trailing edge 70, as shown in FIG. 4. Pressure and suction sides 72, 74 join one another at the leading and trailing edges 68, 70 and are spaced apart from one another in an airfoil thickness direction T. An array of airfoils 64 are positioned about the axis X (corresponding to an X direction) in a circumferential or tangential direction Y. Any suitable number of airfoils may be used for a particular stage in a given engine application.


The exterior surface 76 of the airfoil 64 generates lift based upon its geometry and directs flow along the core flow path C. The airfoil 64 may be constructed from a composite material, or an aluminum alloy or titanium alloy, or a combination of one or more of these. Abrasion-resistant coatings or other protective coatings may be applied to the airfoil. The rotor stages may constructed as an integrally bladed rotor, if desired, or discrete blades having roots secured within corresponding rotor slots of a disc. The stators may be provided by individual vanes, clusters of vanes, or a full ring of vanes.


Airfoil geometries can be described with respect to various parameters provided. The disclosed graph(s) illustrate the relationships between the referenced parameters within 10% of the desired values, which correspond to a hot aerodynamic design point for the airfoil. In another example, the referenced parameters are within 5% of the desired values, and in another example, the reference parameters are within 2% of the desired values. It should be understood that the airfoils may be oriented differently than depicted, depending on the rotational direction of the blades. The signs (positive or negative) used, if any, in the graphs of this disclosure are controlling and the drawings should then be understood as a schematic representation of one example airfoil if inconsistent with the graphs. The signs in this disclosure, including any graphs, comply with the “right hand rule.”



FIG. 5 shows an isolated airfoil 64. As shown, the airfoil 64 is sectioned at a radial position between the root and the tip. A camber mean line ML, or metal line, lies within the airfoil section and is equidistant between the exterior surface of the pressure and suction sides 72, 74. A line 80 is tangent to the camber mean line ML at the leading edge 68, and a line 82 is tangent to the camber mean line ML at the trailing edge 70. The angle between a tangential plane PF normal to the engine axis X and the line 80 is the leading edge angle β1*. The angle between a tangential plane PR normal to the engine axis X and the line 82 is the trailing edge angle β2*. The camber angle θ, or total camber angle, is the angle between the lines 80, 82. The camber angle θ is the measure of the curve of the camber mean line ML and the airfoil 64. The camber angle θ varies with position along the span, and varies between a hot, running condition and a cold, static (“on the bench”) condition.


The geared architecture 48 of the disclosed example permits the fan 42 to be driven by the low pressure turbine 46 through the low speed spool 30 at a lower angular speed than the low pressure turbine 46, which enables the LPC 44 to rotate at higher, more useful speeds. The camber angle θ profile in a hot, running condition along the span of the airfoils 64 provides necessary compressor operation in cruise at that the higher speeds enabled by the geared architecture 48, to enhance aerodynamic functionality and thermal efficiency. As used herein, the hot, running condition is the condition during cruise of the gas turbine engine 20. For example, the camber angle θ profile in the hot, running condition can be determined in a known manner using numerical analysis, such as finite element analysis.



FIG. 6 illustrates the relationship between the camber angle and the average span (AVERAGE SPAN %), which is the average of the radial position at the leading and trailing edges 68, 70. In one example, the airfoils are LPC rotor blades. Two prior art curves (“PRIOR ART”) are illustrated as well as several example inventive curves 88, 90, 92, 94, 96. The airfoil 64 has a relationship between camber angle and span position that defines a curve with a decreasing camber angle from 80% span to 100% span, whereas the prior art curves have an increasing camber angle toward the tip. In the examples, the inventive curves have a decreasing camber angle from 60% span to 100% span.


The camber angle is generally linear from 0% span to 100% span. The camber angle at the 0% span position is about 40° or less. The camber angle is less than 20° from 80% span to 100% span in one example. For example, the camber angle at 80% span is less than 15°, and less than 10° at 100% span. In another example, the camber angle is less than 20° from 60% span to 100% span, and in still another example, the camber angle is less than 20° from 40% span to 100% span. Thus, the airfoil 64 has much less camber angle than prior art airfoils, particularly in the portion toward the tip.


It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom. Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.


Although the different examples have specific components shown in the illustrations, embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from one of the examples in combination with features or components from another one of the examples.


Although an example embodiment has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.

Claims
  • 1. A gas turbine engine comprising: a combustor section arranged between a compressor section and a turbine section, wherein the compressor section includes at least a low pressure compressor and a high pressure compressor, the high pressure compressor arranged upstream of the combustor section;a fan section having an array of twenty-six or fewer fan blades, wherein the fan section has a low fan pressure ratio of less than 1.55, wherein the low pressure compressor is downstream from the fan section, and wherein the low pressure compressor is counter-rotating relative to the fan blades;a geared architecture coupling the fan section to the turbine section or the compressor section;an airfoil arranged in the low pressure compressor and including pressure and suction sides extending in a radial direction from a 0% span position to a 100% span position, wherein the airfoil has a relationship between a camber angle and a span position that defines a curve with a decreasing camber angle within the range of 80% span to 100% span, andwherein the camber angle is less than 20° within the entire range of 40% span to 100% span.
  • 2. The gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the gas turbine engine is a two-spool configuration.
  • 3. The gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the airfoil is rotatable relative to an engine static structure.
  • 4. The gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the curve has a decreasing camber angle within the range of 60% span to 100% span.
  • 5. The gas turbine engine according to claim 1, wherein the camber angle is generally linear within the range of 0% span to 100% span.
  • 6. The gas turbine engine according to claim 5, wherein the camber angle is less than 20° within the range of 80% span to 100% span.
  • 7. The gas turbine engine according to claim 6, wherein the camber angle is less than 20° within the range of 60% span to 100% span.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/941,645, which was filed on Feb. 19, 2014 and is incorporated herein by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2015/016011 2/16/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2015/126774 8/27/2015 WO A
US Referenced Citations (155)
Number Name Date Kind
2714499 Warner Aug 1955 A
2746672 Doll, Jr. May 1956 A
2934259 Hausmann Apr 1960 A
3287906 McCormick Nov 1966 A
3747343 Rosen Jul 1973 A
3754484 Roberts Aug 1973 A
3867062 Troller Feb 1975 A
3892358 Gisslen Jul 1975 A
3905191 Matto Sep 1975 A
4012172 Schwaar Mar 1977 A
4130872 Harloff Dec 1978 A
4284388 Szewalski Aug 1981 A
4431376 Lubenstein et al. Feb 1984 A
4682935 Martin Jul 1987 A
4826400 Gregory May 1989 A
4900230 Patel Feb 1990 A
5088892 Weingold Feb 1992 A
5141400 Murphy et al. Aug 1992 A
5167489 Wadia Dec 1992 A
5192190 Ferleger Mar 1993 A
5211703 Ferleger May 1993 A
5221181 Ferleger Jun 1993 A
5277549 Chen Jan 1994 A
5433674 Sheridan et al. Jul 1995 A
5443367 Samit et al. Aug 1995 A
5447411 Curley et al. Sep 1995 A
5524341 Ferleger Jun 1996 A
5524847 Brodell et al. Jun 1996 A
5525038 Sharma et al. Jun 1996 A
5624234 Neely et al. Apr 1997 A
5642985 Spear et al. Jul 1997 A
5725354 Wadia et al. Mar 1998 A
5778659 Duesler et al. Jul 1998 A
5785498 Quinn et al. Jul 1998 A
5857836 Stickler et al. Jan 1999 A
5915917 Eveker et al. Jun 1999 A
5975841 Lindemuth et al. Nov 1999 A
6059532 Chen et al. May 2000 A
6071077 Rowlands Jun 2000 A
6079948 Sasaki et al. Jun 2000 A
6195983 Wadia Mar 2001 B1
6223616 Sheridan May 2001 B1
6299412 Wood et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312219 Wood et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318070 Rey et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328533 Decker et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331100 Liu et al. Dec 2001 B1
6341942 Chou et al. Jan 2002 B1
6565334 Bradbury May 2003 B1
6814541 Evans et al. Nov 2004 B2
6899526 Doloresco et al. May 2005 B2
6994524 Owen et al. Feb 2006 B2
7021042 Law Apr 2006 B2
7114911 Martin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7204676 Dutton et al. Apr 2007 B2
7374403 Decker et al. May 2008 B2
7396205 Dube et al. Jul 2008 B2
7476086 Wadia et al. Jan 2009 B2
7497664 Walter et al. Mar 2009 B2
7547186 Schuster et al. Jun 2009 B2
7591754 Duong Sep 2009 B2
7785075 Botrel et al. Aug 2010 B2
7806653 Burton et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824305 Duong et al. Nov 2010 B2
7926260 Sheridan et al. Apr 2011 B2
7967571 Wood et al. Jun 2011 B2
7997872 Wilson Aug 2011 B2
7997882 Shulver Aug 2011 B2
8087885 Suciu Jan 2012 B2
8147207 Orosa et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167548 Greim May 2012 B2
8167567 Kirchner et al. May 2012 B2
8177496 Wilson et al. May 2012 B2
8205432 Sheridan Jun 2012 B2
8246292 Morin et al. Aug 2012 B1
RE43710 Spear et al. Oct 2012 E
8382438 Guemmer Feb 2013 B2
8393870 Nash et al. Mar 2013 B2
8464426 Kirchner et al. Jun 2013 B2
20020141863 Liu Oct 2002 A1
20030086788 Chandraker May 2003 A1
20030163983 Seda et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040091353 Shahpar et al. May 2004 A1
20050031454 Doloresco et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050169761 Dube et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050254956 Dutton et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060210395 Schuster Sep 2006 A1
20060222488 Fessou Oct 2006 A1
20060228206 Decker Oct 2006 A1
20070041841 Walter et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070160478 Jarrah et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070201983 Arinci et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070243068 Wadia et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080101959 McRae et al. May 2008 A1
20080107538 Bois et al. May 2008 A1
20080118362 Hu et al. May 2008 A1
20080120839 Schilling May 2008 A1
20080131271 Wood et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080148564 Burton et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080226454 Decker et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090226322 Clemen Sep 2009 A1
20090257866 Greim Oct 2009 A1
20090274554 Guemmer Nov 2009 A1
20090297355 Herr et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090304518 Kodama et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090317227 Grover et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100054946 Orosa Mar 2010 A1
20100148396 Xie et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100215503 Myoren et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100232970 Murooka et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100254797 Grover et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100260609 Wood et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100331139 McCune Dec 2010 A1
20110081252 Li Apr 2011 A1
20110116917 Wang et al. May 2011 A1
20110135482 Nash et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110150660 Micheli Jun 2011 A1
20110206498 McCooey Aug 2011 A1
20110206527 Harvey et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110225979 Hoeger et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110268578 Praisner et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110286850 Micheli Nov 2011 A1
20110286856 Micheli Nov 2011 A1
20120057982 O'Hearn et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120195767 Gervais et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120237344 Wood et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120243975 Breeze-Stringfellow Sep 2012 A1
20120243983 Breeze-Stringfellow et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120244005 Breeze-Stringfellow et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130004297 Sheridan Jan 2013 A1
20130008170 Gallagher et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130022473 Tran Jan 2013 A1
20130089415 Brown Apr 2013 A1
20130141935 Huang Jun 2013 A1
20130149108 Webster Jun 2013 A1
20130164488 Wood et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130189117 Baltas et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130192199 Merry et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130192261 Mayer et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130192266 Houston Aug 2013 A1
20130202403 Morin et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130219859 Suciu Aug 2013 A1
20130219922 Gilson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130224040 Straccia Aug 2013 A1
20130259668 Myoren et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130266451 Pesteil et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130315739 Cellier Nov 2013 A1
20130340406 Gallagher Dec 2013 A1
20140030060 Magowan Jan 2014 A1
20140248155 Merville Sep 2014 A1
20140341749 Perrot et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150017012 Pouzadoux et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150118059 Perrot Apr 2015 A1
20150354367 Gallagher et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160195104 Cellier Jul 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
1903642 Aug 1970 DE
1903642 Aug 1970 DE
102008055824 May 2009 DE
00182100 Jun 1983 EP
0251978 Jan 1988 EP
0661413 Jul 1995 EP
0745755 Dec 1996 EP
0774567 May 1997 EP
1074700 Feb 2001 EP
1098092 May 2001 EP
1106835 Jun 2001 EP
1106836 Jun 2001 EP
1106836 Jun 2001 EP
1111188 Jun 2001 EP
1505302 Feb 2005 EP
1505302 Feb 2005 EP
1508669 Feb 2005 EP
1524405 Apr 2005 EP
1582695 Oct 2005 EP
1939399 Jul 2008 EP
0801230 May 2009 EP
2075408 Jul 2009 EP
2133573 Dec 2009 EP
2226468 Sep 2010 EP
2226468 Sep 2010 EP
1930598 Aug 2012 EP
2535527 Dec 2012 EP
2543818 Jan 2013 EP
2543818 Jan 2013 EP
2631491 Aug 2013 EP
2995771 Mar 2016 EP
1516041 Jun 1978 GB
2041090 Sep 1980 GB
2170868 Aug 1986 GB
2431697 May 2007 GB
H08165999 Jun 1996 JP
2014015858 Jan 2014 JP
2007001389 Jan 2007 WO
2007038674 Apr 2007 WO
2008109036 Sep 2008 WO
2009103528 Aug 2009 WO
2014066503 May 2014 WO
2015126449 Aug 2015 WO
2015126774 Aug 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (137)
Entry
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052282, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016554, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052434, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052516, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052447, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052080, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032 dated Sep. 1, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561 dated Sep. 1, 2016.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14883170.4 dated Apr. 19, 2018.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016011, dated Sep. 1, 2016.
EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 14883154.8.
EP Search Report dated Jan. 23, 2017 for European Application No. 148831175.
EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2017 for European Application No. 15752432.3.
EP Search Report dated Jan. 26, 2017 for European Application No. 15793425.8.
Partial EP Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2017 for European Application No. 15793193.2.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2017 for European Application No. 15752887.8.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 9, 2017 for European Application No. 14883515.0.
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2017 for European Application No. 15752124.6.
EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2017 for European Application No. 15751498.5.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15751454.8.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15793323.5.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2017 for European Application No. 15796827.2.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15792194.1.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15751738.4.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 15752593.2.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 14883036.7.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 22, 2017 for European Application No. 15793112.2.
EP Search Report dated Feb. 20, 2017 for European Application No. 15793268.2.
Extended EP Search report for EP Application No. 15793193.2 dated May 12, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 148828965 dated Oct. 19, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14883503.6 dated Nov. 6, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15752013.1 dated Dec. 5, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15751617.0 dated Dec. 5, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15793127.0 dated Dec. 1, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15792720.3 dated Oct. 17, 2017.
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012.
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012.
NASA Conference Publication. Quiet, powered-lift propulsion. Cleveland, Ohio. Nov. 14-15, 1978. pp. 1-420.
“Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications”, Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005).
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8). Start p. 32.
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710. pp. 1-13.
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883. pp. 1-27.
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15792720.3 dated Jan. 31, 2018.
Smith, L.,Yeh,H.,(1963).Sweep and Dihedral Effects in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery;Journal of Basic Engineering; Sep. 1963.pp. 401-416.
Engine Specifications. Engine Alliance GP7200—The Engine for the A380. Retrieved Feb. 19, 2015 from http://www.enginealliance.com/engine_specifications.html.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016018, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015016091, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016032, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016135, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016584, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015561, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015575, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015579, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015586, dated Nov. 24, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016187, dated May 20, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016011, dated May 21, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016078, dated May 29, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016154, dated May 22, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016086, dated May 26, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016554, dated May 26, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/015554, dated May 21, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052325, dated May 29, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016378, dated May 29, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052293, dated May 29, 2015.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/052516, dated Jun. 10, 2015.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052447 dated Dec. 8, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052441 dated Dec. 12, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052282 dated Dec. 5, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052474 dated Dec. 5, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052434 dated Nov. 27, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052468 dated Dec. 12, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2015/016083 dated Jul. 21, 2015.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052440 dated Nov. 27, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052437 dated Dec. 26, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052238 dated Dec. 11, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052080 dated Aug. 21, 2014.
Intentional Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application PCT/US2014/052096 dated Nov. 28, 2014.
McMillian, K (2008) Material development for fan blade containment casing. Abstract. p. 1. Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006.
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida. pp. 145-153.
Agarwal, B.D and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York. pp. 1-30, 50-1, 56-8, 60-1, 64-71, 87-9, 324-9, 436-7.
Carney, K., Pereira, M. Revilock, and Matheny, P. (2003). Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. pp. 1-10.
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers,108(8), 65-67.
Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe and science technology. Washington, D.C: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-60.
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998.
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.G., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in Nasa's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007.
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modern Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case pp. 1-4.
Hall, C.A. Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, and 479-487.
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37(20), 1821-1837.
Brennan, P.J. and Kroliczek, E.J. (1979). Heat pipe design handbook. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration by B & K Engineering, Inc. Jun. 1979. pp. 1-348.
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 1-24.
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. p. 11.
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233. pp. 1-31.
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987. pp. 1-23.
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report NASA/CR-159473 pp. 1-289.
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189.
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 465.
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978. pp. 39-43.
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995. pp. 3-9.
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. pp. 341-344.
Lau, K, Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436.
Shorter Oxford English dictionary,6th Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888.
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 145, 355-358.
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25.
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 8-15.
Pyrograf-III Carbon Nanofiber. Product guide. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2015 from: http://pyrografproducts.com/Merchant5/merchant?mvc?Screen=cp_nanofiber.
Nanocor Technical Data for Epoxy Nanocomposites using Nanomer 1.30E Nanoclay. Nnacor, Inc. Oct. 2004.
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers. pp. 187-216.
Wendus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport. NASA/CR-2003-212467. pp. 1-37.
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M. The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994.pp. 1-7.
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824.
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126.
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982.
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010. pp. 1-8.
Gliebe, P.R. and Janardan, B.A. (2003). Ultra-high bypass engine aeroacoustic study. NASA/CR-2003-21252. GE Aircraft Engines, Cincinnati, Ohio. Oct. 2003. pp. 1-103.
Moxon, J. How to save fuel in tomorrow's engines. Flight International. Jul. 30, 1983. 3873(124). pp. 272-273.
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876.
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. pp. 1-9.
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 12-15, 1983. pp. 1-12.
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972. pp. 1-12.
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. pp. 510-512.
Ivchenko—Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012.
Ivchenko—Progress AI-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engine—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011.
Ivchenko—Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007.
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009.
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010.
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010.
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012.
Aerodynamic Design technique for Optimizing Fan Blade Spacing, Rogalsky et all., Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Society of Canada, 1999.
Turbine Design and Application. vol. 2. NASA, 1973.
Analytical Parametric Investigation of Low Pressure Ration Fan, NASA, 1973 Metzger et al.
Oyama et al., Multiobjective Optimization of a Multi-Stage Compressor Using Evolutionary Algorithm, NASA, 2002, AIAA 2002-3535 pp. 1-11.
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016083, dated Jul. 21, 2015.
European Office Action for European Application No. 15752593.2 dated Sep. 9, 2019.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160356285 A1 Dec 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61941645 Feb 2014 US