The present invention relates to a gas turbine engine and more particularly to an engine mounting configuration for the mounting of a turbofan gas turbine engine to an aircraft pylon.
A gas turbine engine may be mounted at various points on an aircraft such as a pylon integrated with an aircraft structure. An engine mounting configuration ensures the transmission of loads between the engine and the aircraft structure. The loads typically include the weight of the engine, thrust, aerodynamic side loads, and rotary torque about the engine axis. The engine mount configuration must also absorb the deformations to which the engine is subjected during different flight phases and the dimensional variations due to thermal expansion and retraction.
One conventional engine mounting configuration includes a pylon having a forward mount and an aft mount with relatively long thrust links which extend forward from the aft mount to the engine intermediate case structure. Although effective, one disadvantage of this conventional type mounting arrangement is the relatively large “punch loads” into the engine cases from the thrust links which react the thrust from the engine and couple the thrust to the pylon. These loads tend to distort the intermediate case and the low pressure compressor (LPC) cases. The distortion may cause the clearances between the static cases and rotating blade tips to increase which may negatively affect engine performance and increase fuel burn.
A gas turbine engine according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes a fan section, a low spool that includes a low pressure compressor section, a high spool that includes a high pressure compressor section, a gear train defined along an engine centerline axis, the low spool operable to drive the fan section through said gear train, an overall pressure ratio provided by the combination of the low pressure compressor section and the high pressure compressor section, the low pressure compressor section includes four (4) stages, and the high pressure compressor section includes eight (8) stages to provide the overall pressure ratio.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the low spool may include a three-stage low pressure turbine.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the low pressure turbine may define a pressure ratio that is greater than about five (5).
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the fan bypass flow may define a bypass ratio greater than ten (10).
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the gear train may define a gear reduction ratio of greater than or equal to 2.5.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the engine may include a fan variable area nozzle to vary a fan nozzle exit area and adjust a pressure ratio of a fan bypass airflow of the fan section during engine operation.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the engine may include a controller operable to control the fan variable area nozzle to vary a fan nozzle exit area and adjust the pressure ratio of the fan bypass airflow.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the controller may be operable to reduce the fan nozzle exit area at a cruise flight condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the controller is operable to control the fan nozzle exit area to reduce a fan instability.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the fan variable area nozzle may define a trailing edge of the fan nacelle.
A gas turbine engine according to another exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes a gear train defined along an engine centerline axis, the gear train defines a gear reduction ratio of greater than or equal to 2.5, and a spool along the engine centerline axis which drives the gear train, the spool includes a three-stage low pressure turbine and a four-stage low pressure compressor.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the low pressure turbine may define a pressure ratio that is greater than five (5). Additionally or alternatively, the bypass flow may define a bypass ratio greater than ten (10).
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the gear train may define a gear reduction ratio of greater than or equal to 2.5.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the low pressure turbine may define a pressure ratio that is greater than five (5), and the bypass flow may define a bypass ratio greater than ten (10).
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently disclosed embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
The turbofan engine 10 includes a core engine within a core nacelle C that houses a low spool 14 and high spool 24. The low spool 14 includes a low pressure compressor 16 and low pressure turbine 18. The low spool 14 drives a fan section 20 connected to the low spool 14 either directly or through a gear train 25.
The high spool 24 includes a high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. A combustor 30 is arranged between the high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. The low and high spools 14, 24 rotate about an engine axis of rotation A.
In one disclosed, non-limiting embodiment, the low pressure compressor 16 includes 4 stages (16A-16D shown in
The engine 10 in one non-limiting embodiment is a high-bypass geared architecture aircraft engine. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 10 bypass ratio is greater than ten (10:1), the turbofan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 16, and the low pressure turbine 18 has a pressure ratio that is greater than 5:1. The gear train 25 may be an epicycle gear train such as a planetary gear system or other gear system with a gear reduction ratio of greater than 2.5:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.
Airflow enters the fan nacelle F which at least partially surrounds the core nacelle C. The fan section 20 communicates airflow into the core nacelle C to the low pressure compressor 16. Core airflow compressed by the low pressure compressor 16 and the high pressure compressor 26 is mixed with the fuel in the combustor 30 where is ignited, and burned. The resultant high pressure combustor products are expanded through the high pressure turbine 28 and low pressure turbine 18. The turbines 28, 18 are rotationally coupled to the compressors 26, 16 respectively to drive the compressors 26, 16 in response to the expansion of the combustor product. The low pressure turbine 18 also drives the fan section 20 through gear train 25. A core engine exhaust E exits the core nacelle C through a core nozzle 43 defined between the core nacelle C and a tail cone 33.
With reference to
The engine static structure 44 generally has sub-structures including a case structure often referred to as the engine backbone. The engine static structure 44 generally includes a fan case 46, an intermediate case (IMC) 48, a high pressure compressor case 50, a combustor case 52A, a high pressure turbine case 52B, a thrust case 52C, a low pressure turbine case 54, and a turbine exhaust case 56 (
The fan section 20 includes a fan rotor 32 with a plurality of circumferentially spaced radially outwardly extending fan blades 34. The fan blades 34 are surrounded by the fan case 46. The core engine case structure is secured to the fan case 46 at the IMC 48 which includes a multiple of circumferentially spaced radially extending struts 40 which radially span the core engine case structure and the fan case 20.
The engine static structure 44 further supports a bearing system upon which the turbines 28, 18, compressors 26, 16 and fan rotor 32 rotate. A #1 fan dual bearing 60 which rotationally supports the fan rotor 32 is axially located generally within the fan case 46. The #1 fan dual bearing 60 is preloaded to react fan thrust forward and aft (in case of surge). A #2 LPC bearing 62 which rotationally supports the low spool 14 is axially located generally within the intermediate case (IMC) 48. The #2 LPC bearing 62 reacts thrust. A #3 fan dual bearing 64 which rotationally supports the high spool 24 and also reacts thrust. The #3 fan bearing 64 is also axially located generally within the IMC 48 just forward of the high pressure compressor case 50. A #4 bearing 66 which rotationally supports a rear segment of the low spool 14 reacts only radial loads. The #4 bearing 66 is axially located generally within the thrust case 52C in an aft section thereof. A #5 bearing 68 rotationally supports the rear segment of the low spool 14 and reacts only radial loads. The #5 bearing 68 is axially located generally within the thrust case 52C just aft of the #4 bearing 66. It should be understood that this is an exemplary configuration and any number of bearings may be utilized.
The #4 bearing 66 and the #5 bearing 68 are supported within a mid-turbine frame (MTF) 70 to straddle radially extending structural struts 72 which are preloaded in tension (
A dual rotor engine such as that disclosed in the illustrated embodiment typically includes a forward frame and a rear frame that support the main rotor bearings. The intermediate case (IMC) 48 also includes the radially extending struts 40 which are generally radially aligned with the #2 LPC bearing 62 (
The turbofan gas turbine engine 10 is mounted to aircraft structure such as an aircraft wing through a mount system 80 attachable by the pylon 12. The mount system 80 includes a forward mount 82 and an aft mount 84 (
Referring to
The forward mount 82 supports vertical loads and side loads. The forward mount 82 in one non-limiting embodiment includes a shackle arrangement which mounts to the IMC 48 at two points 86A, 86B. The forward mount 82 is generally a plate-like member which is oriented transverse to the plane which contains engine axis A. Fasteners are oriented through the forward mount 82 to engage the intermediate case (IMC) 48 generally parallel to the engine axis A. In this illustrated non-limiting embodiment, the forward mount 82 is secured to the IMC 40. In another non-limiting embodiment, the forward mount 82 is secured to a portion of the core engine, such as the high-pressure compressor case 50 of the gas turbine engine 10 (see
Referring to
Referring to
The first A-arm 88A and the second A-arm 88B of the aft mount 84 force the resultant thrust vector at the engine casing to be reacted along the engine axis A which minimizes tip clearance losses due to engine loading at the aft mount 84. This minimizes blade tip clearance requirements and thereby improves engine performance.
The wiffle tree assembly 92 includes a wiffle link 98 which supports a central ball joint 100, a first sliding ball joint 102A and a second sliding ball joint 102B (
The drag link 94 includes a ball joint 104A mounted to the thrust case 52C and ball joint 104B mounted to the rear mount platform 90 (
The aft mount 84 transmits engine loads directly to the thrust case 52C and the MTF 70. Thrust, vertical, side, and torque loads are transmitted directly from the MTF 70 which reduces the number of structural members as compared to current in-practice designs.
The mount system 80 is compact, and occupies space within the core nacelle volume as compared to turbine exhaust case-mounted configurations, which occupy space outside of the core nacelle which may require additional or relatively larger aerodynamic fairings and increase aerodynamic drag and fuel consumption. The mount system 80 eliminates the heretofore required thrust links from the IMC, which frees up valuable space adjacent the IMC 48 and the high pressure compressor case 50 within the core nacelle C.
It should be understood that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The disclosed embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
The present disclosure is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/131,876, filed Jun. 2, 2008 U.S. Pat. No. 8,128,021.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2608821 | Hunsaker | Sep 1952 | A |
2748623 | Hill | Jun 1956 | A |
3033002 | Allan | May 1962 | A |
3111005 | Howell et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3185857 | Johnson | May 1965 | A |
3363419 | Wilde | Jan 1968 | A |
3526092 | Steel | Sep 1970 | A |
3729957 | Petrie et al. | May 1973 | A |
3747343 | Rosen | Jul 1973 | A |
3754484 | Roberts | Aug 1973 | A |
3861139 | Jones et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4118927 | Kronogard | Oct 1978 | A |
4136286 | O'Halloran | Jan 1979 | A |
4233555 | Roche | Nov 1980 | A |
4405892 | Staerzl et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4452567 | Treby et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4463553 | Boudigues | Aug 1984 | A |
4660376 | Johnson | Apr 1987 | A |
4808076 | Jarmon et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809498 | Giffin et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4827712 | Coplin | May 1989 | A |
4879624 | Jones et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5074109 | Mandet et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5081832 | Mowill | Jan 1992 | A |
5160251 | Ciokajlo | Nov 1992 | A |
5168208 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182464 | Woodworth et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5252905 | Wills | Oct 1993 | A |
5307622 | Ciokajio et al. | May 1994 | A |
5388964 | Ciokajlo et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390068 | Schultz | Feb 1995 | A |
5433674 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5625276 | Scott et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5694027 | Satake et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694765 | Hield et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5729059 | Kilroy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734255 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740668 | Fujiwara et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754033 | Thomson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5791789 | Van Duyn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806303 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5886890 | Ishida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5949153 | Tison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6073439 | Beaven et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104171 | Dvorsky et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6209311 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223616 | Sheridan | May 2001 | B1 |
6260351 | Delano et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6339927 | DiPietro, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6378308 | Pfluger | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6555929 | Eaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6619030 | Seda et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631310 | Leslie | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639331 | Schultz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647707 | Dev | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653821 | Kern et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657416 | Kern et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663530 | Poulin et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668629 | Leslie | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669393 | Schilling | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6708482 | Seda | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6732502 | Seda et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735954 | MacFarlane et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6763653 | Orlando et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6792759 | Rollins, III | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6847297 | Lavoie et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855089 | Poulin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6892115 | Berkcan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895741 | Rago et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6909942 | Andarawis et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914763 | Reedy | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6966174 | Paul | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6985784 | Vandevanter et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999291 | Andarawis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7019495 | Patterson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7043340 | Papallo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055306 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104918 | Mitrovic | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7144349 | Mitrovic | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7195446 | Seda et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7216475 | Johnson | May 2007 | B2 |
7219490 | Dev | May 2007 | B2 |
7223197 | Poulin et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7269938 | Moniz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299621 | Bart et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301738 | Pearlman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7334392 | Moniz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338259 | Shah et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7406830 | Valentian et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409819 | Henry | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7500365 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513103 | Orlando et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7557544 | Heinz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7591754 | Duong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594404 | Somanath et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600370 | Dawson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610763 | Somanath et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632064 | Somanath et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656060 | Algrain | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665293 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685808 | Orlando et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694505 | Schilling | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704178 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716914 | Schilling | May 2010 | B2 |
7721549 | Baran | May 2010 | B2 |
7762086 | Schwark | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765786 | Klingels et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797946 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815417 | Somanath et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7816813 | Yagudayev et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7832193 | Orlando et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841163 | Welch et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841165 | Orlando et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7871247 | Shah et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882691 | Lemmers, Jr. et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882693 | Schilling | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7926260 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942079 | Russ | May 2011 | B2 |
7950237 | Grabowski et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959532 | Suciu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8015798 | Norris et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8015828 | Moniz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8061969 | Durocher et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075261 | Merry et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091371 | Durocher et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104265 | Kupratis | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104289 | McCune et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106633 | Dozier et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8166748 | Schilling | May 2012 | B2 |
8172717 | Lopez et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191352 | Schilling | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8220245 | Papandreas | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8297916 | McCune et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8297917 | McCune et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
20030235523 | Lyubovsky et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050138914 | Paul | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060029894 | Zinn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060130456 | Suciu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177302 | Berry | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179818 | Merchant | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060244327 | Kundel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070125066 | Orlando et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070262661 | Ai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080056888 | Somanath et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080098713 | Orlando et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080098718 | Henry et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116010 | Portlock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148881 | Moniz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149445 | Kern et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080184694 | Guimbard et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276621 | Somanath et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080304974 | Marshall et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007569 | Lemmers, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090053058 | Kohlenberg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056306 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097967 | Smith et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090229242 | Schwark | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245997 | Hurwitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090293445 | Ress, Jr. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314881 | Suciu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317229 | Suciu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320488 | Gilson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005810 | Jarrell et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007207 | Peuser | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100080700 | Venter | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105516 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100126141 | Schilling | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127117 | Combes et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132376 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100132377 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154384 | Schilling | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100219779 | Bradbrook | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301617 | Lundbladh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317477 | Sheridan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326050 | Schilling et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110056208 | Norris et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106510 | Poon | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116510 | Breslin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130246 | McCune et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149624 | Yamanaka | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120007431 | Jang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017603 | Bart et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130011547 | Girard et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130115476 | Castle et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1309721 | Mar 1973 | GB |
2130340 | May 1984 | GB |
2199375 | Jul 1988 | GB |
2419639 | Sep 2009 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Diagram of prior art V2500 and PW4090 engines. |
Jane's Aero-Engines, Issue Seven, Copyright 2000, pp. 510-512. |
Kandebo, Stanley, “GearedTurbofan Engine Design Targets Cost, Complexity,” 1998, Aviation Week & Space Technology, vol. 148, Issue 8, start p. 32. |
Mattingly, et al., Aircraft Engine Design, 2002, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2nd Edition, p. 292. |
Ciepluch et al., “Quiet, Powered-Lift Propulsion”, NASA Conference Publication 2077, Nov. 14-15, 1978. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/072271 mailed on Mar. 8, 2013. |
Kandebo; Geared-Turbofan Engine Design Targets Cost, Complexity, Aviation Week & Space Technology; New York; Feb. 23, 1998, 4 pp. |
Hendricks et al, “Performance and Weight Estimates for an Advanced Open Rotor Engine” NASA/ TM-2012-217710, Sep. 2012, 20 pp. |
Gunston, “Jane's Aero-Engines” Pratt & Whitney/USA, Mar. 2000, JAEng-Issue 7, 5 pp. |
Zalud, “Gears Put a New Spin on Turbofan Performance” Machine Design, Nov. 5, 1998, 2010Penton Media, Inc., 5 pp. |
Sessions, Ron, “Turbo Hydra-Matic 350 handbook”, 1985, The Berkley Publishing Group, pp. 24-25. |
Baskharone, Erian, “Principles of Turbomachinery in Air-Breathing Engines”, 2006, Cambridge University Press, pp. 261-263. |
Nagendra, S., “Optimal rapid multidisciplinary response networks: RAPIDDISK”, 2005, Stuct Multidisk Optim 29, 213-231. |
Guha, Optimum Fan Pressure Ratio for Bypass Engines with Separate or Mixed Exhaust Streams, 2001, Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 17 No. 5 September-October. |
Http://www.gereports.com/ges-breakthrough-genx-debuts-at-the-paris-air-show/ dated Jun. 15, 2009 and viewed Jan. 23, 2012. |
http://www.geaviation.com/engines/commercial/genx/2b—fett.html viewed Jan. 28, 2012). |
Article—“Gas Power Cycle—Jet Propulsion Technology, a Case Study,” from MachineDesign.com website. |
Article—“Gears Put a New Spin on Turbofan Performance,” printed from MachineDesign.com website. |
Hill et al., “Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion” pp. 307-308. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120121390 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12131876 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13340940 | US |