The present invention relates to gas turbine engines. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to apparatus and method for reducing combustion dynamics and emissions.
Gas turbine engines operate to produce mechanical work or thrust. Land-based gas turbine engines typically have a generator coupled thereto for the purposes of generating electricity. There are a number of issues that affect the overall performance and durability of the engine components, especially the combustion section. The combustion process creates varying pressure oscillations and dynamics in the combustion hardware that can result in significant wear. Specifically, the pressure oscillations can cause mating hardware to vibrate and move relative to one another. Excessive combustion dynamics can cause premature wear of mating hardware such that the hardware must be repaired or replaced.
Typically, gas turbine combustors comprise multiple fuel circuits, depending on the quantity and location of the fuel nozzles as well as the combustor operating conditions. For example, a General Electric Frame 7FA gas turbine engine that utilizes a dry-low NOx (DLN) 2.6 combustor, has six main fuel nozzles per combustor and additional fuel injectors located radially about the combustor case, known as quaternary nozzles. A different quantity of these fuel nozzles operate together as the engine increases and decreases in power in an effort to minimize oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions and combustion dynamics in the combustor. For this engine design, there are four different fuel circuits associated with the different nozzles, PM1, PM2, PM3, and quaternary, with each circuit requiring a specific fuel flow rate depending on the operating conditions.
The invention is defined by the claims below, not by this Summary, which is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. Embodiments of the present invention are directed towards a system and method for, among other things, minimizing combustion dynamics and emissions in a gas turbine engine.
The present invention provides embodiments for controlling a gas turbine engine to minimize combustion dynamics and emissions. In an embodiment of the present invention a way is provided for controlling a gas turbine engine in which a compressor inlet temperature is measured and a turbine reference temperature is calculated. Utilizing a look-up table for a given fuel circuit, the turbine reference temperature and measured compressor inlet temperature are located in the table or interpolated from values in the table, and a fuel split corresponding to these temperatures is identified. The fuel flow for the fuel circuit is adjusted according to the identified fuel split.
In an additional embodiment, an alternate way is provided of controlling a gas turbine engine to minimize combustion dynamics and emissions. In this embodiment of the invention a method is provided for controlling a gas turbine engine in which a compressor inlet temperature is measured and a turbine reference temperature is calculated and from which a baseline fuel schedule for a given fuel circuit is selected which corresponds to the turbine reference temperature. A baseline fuel split corresponding to the turbine reference temperature is then determined. Next, a bias parameter, which is a percentage change to the fuel split, is determined with the bias parameter varying as a function of the measured compressor inlet temperature. The fuel flow to the fuel circuit is then adjusted to the sum of the baseline fuel split and the bias parameter.
In a further embodiment, a gas turbine engine is provided comprising an inlet, a compressor, at least one combustor having at least two fuel circuits, a turbine, and a control system. The control system has a processor and a memory containing a series of computer-readable instructions that measures a compressor inlet temperature in real-time and calculates a turbine reference temperature with these temperatures being used to identify a fuel split for each fuel circuit of the combustor.
By determining and controlling the fuel flow to the fuel circuits as a function of both a compressor inlet temperature and turbine reference temperature, combustion dynamics can be reduced. Extremely lean fuel conditions, which tend to cause pressure fluctuations in the combustor and create combustion noise and vibration, are hereby minimized in the present invention when both compressor inlet temperature and turbine reference temperature are used to determine fuel flow.
Additional advantages and features of the present invention will be set forth in part in a description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned from practice of the invention.
The present invention is described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
The subject matter of the present invention is described with specificity herein to meet statutory requirements. However, the description itself is not intended to limit the scope of this patent. Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject matter might also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps or combinations of steps similar to the ones described in this document, in conjunction with other present or future technologies. Moreover, although the terms “step” and/or “block” may be used herein to connote different elements of methods employed, the terms should not be interpreted as implying any particular order among or between various steps herein disclosed unless and except when the order of individual steps is explicitly described.
Referring initially to
A method of controlling the gas turbine engine 100 is shown in
For the embodiment disclosed in
If the CTIM and TTRF do not correspond to values listed in the look-up table, then in a step 314, a determination is made as to whether or not only the TTRF corresponds to a value in the look-up table. If the TTRF corresponds to a value in the look-up table, then in a step 316, the fuel split is interpolated from two CTIM's listed in the look-up table that correspond to the TTRF. The two CTIM's used for the interpolation are typically two values that bracket the measured CTIM. For example, with reference to
However, if the TTRF does not correspond to a turbine reference temperature listed in the look-up table, then in a step 320, a determination is made as to whether or not the CTIM corresponds to a value listed in the look-up table. If the CTIM is listed in the look-up table, then, in a step 322, the fuel split is interpolated from two TTRF's listed in the look-up table that bracket the calculated TTRF. For example, again with reference to
If neither the TTRF nor the CTIM correspond to values listed in the look-up table, then, in a step 326, it is necessary to interpolate the fuel split for the fuel circuit from two CTIM's and two TTRF's listed in the look-up table that preferably bracket the measured CTIM and calculated TTRF. Referring back to
Once the fuel flow has been adjusted to one of the above-identified percentages, a determination is made in a step 330 as to whether or not additional fuel circuits are to be scheduled. Depending on the mode of operation of the combustor, there may or may not be other fuel circuits operating at the same time. If other fuel circuits are to be scheduled, then in a step 332, the fuel split identified from the look-up table is subtracted from the fuel balance to determine the remaining fuel balance and the process returns to step 302. For example, for the gas turbine engine 100 previously identified, the fuel split is determined for the quaternary circuit first, then PM1, and PM3, with the remaining fuel directed to the PM2 circuit. Therefore, if the CTIM is measured at 60 deg. F. and TTRF is calculated to be 2450 deg. F., then according to
If there are no other fuel schedules for other fuel circuits to be determined, then in a step 334, the CTIM measurement is repeated and in a step 336 the TTRF is recalculated. A determination is made in a step 338 as to whether or not the calculated TTRF has changed. If the TTRF has changed, then the fuel flow must be adjusted to all circuits being used, and the process returns to step 304. However, if the TTRF has not changed, then the fuel flow levels are maintained in a step 340 and the process of measuring and verifying CTIM temperatures repeats itself.
In the event that either the measured CTIM or the TTRF results in a value outside of the values listed in the tables, then either the maximum or minimum value listed is used for the interpolation process.
It is important to note that the process defined above is one in which the measured and calculated variables can be used to determine the fuel splits. It is possible that the setting of the fuel splits could be determined in slightly different manner that is still within the scope of the present invention. For example, with respect to the process depicted in
In an alternate embodiment, a method of controlling a gas turbine engine having a compressor, at least one combustor, a turbine, and a control system is disclosed in which an alternate means is used to determine and control the fuel flow to a gas turbine engine given a measured compressor inlet temperature and a calculated turbine reference temperature. This method 500 is disclosed in detail in
Once the baseline fuel split has been determined, a bias parameter is then determined, where the bias parameter is a percentage change to the overall fuel flow and is a function of compressor inlet temperature (CTIM). Each fuel circuit has a unique set of bias parameters that are charted and shown in graphical form in
In a step 516, a determination is made as to whether or not the measured CTIM corresponds to the TTRF. If the measured CTIM corresponds to a calculated TTRF, then the bias parameter is determined in a step 518. If the measured CTIM does not specifically correspond to the TTRF, then the bias parameter must be interpolated in a step 520 from two compressor inlet temperatures. For example, referring to
Once the bias parameter is determined, then the fuel split is adjusted to the sum of the baseline fuel split and the bias parameter for the fuel circuit in a step 522. For the example discussed above for the quaternary fuel circuit, a fuel split for a TTRF of 2200 deg. F. and a CTIM of 30 deg. F. would be a baseline fuel schedule of 5% plus 0.75% for the bias parameter for a total of 5.75% of the available fuel flow. By biasing the fuel flow higher for the lower CTIM, the combustion noise is reduced.
In a step 524, a determination is made as to whether or not there are additional fuel circuits to be scheduled. If additional fuel circuits are to be scheduled, then the fuel split identified above (baseline fuel schedule+bias parameter) is subtracted from the available fuel balance in a step 526 and the process returns to step 502 to calculate the fuel split for a different fuel circuit. However, if there are no other fuel circuits to be scheduled, then the process follows to a step 528 where the CTIM is measured and checked in a step 530 to determine if it has changed. If the CTIM has changed from what was originally measured, then the process returns to step 504. However, if the CTIM remains the same, then the process maintains the current fuel split in a step 532 and continues to monitor the CTIM. For the embodiment discussed herein, the fuel schedule is determined for four fuel circuits; the quaternary, PM1, and PM3, with the remaining available fuel being dedicated to the PM2 circuit.
In the event that either the measured CTIM or the TTRF results in a value outside of the values listed in the tables, then either the maximum or minimum value listed is used for the interpolation process.
It is important to note that the process defined above is one in which the measured and calculated variables can be used to determine the fuel splits. It is possible that the setting of the fuel splits could be determined in slightly different manner that is still within the scope of the present invention. For example, CTIM could be considered first followed by TTRF. Furthermore, the control system 114 could follow a double interpolation-type program starting with either TTRF or CTIM.
As previously discussed with respect to
The present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments, which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from its scope.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all the ends and objects set forth above, together with other advantages which are obvious and inherent to the system and method. It will be understood that certain features and sub-combinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and sub-combinations. This is contemplated by and within the scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3921390 | Stoltman | Nov 1975 | A |
5339636 | Donnelly et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5584171 | Sato et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5636507 | Rajamani et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5661969 | Beebe et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5802854 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6226974 | Andrew et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6393355 | Muramatsu | May 2002 | B1 |
6408611 | Keller et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6708496 | Gadde et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715295 | Gadde et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6715916 | Tomlinson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6805483 | Tomlinson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814060 | Solomons et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7162875 | Fletcher et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7260937 | Kothnur et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7565805 | Steber et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7681401 | Ziminsky et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7874161 | Williams | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8015826 | Myers et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20030163288 | Follin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030192316 | Rowe et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040025512 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040117148 | Davies | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040255594 | Baino et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255595 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050114010 | Healy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050166595 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050204745 | Hirayama et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262825 | Certain | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010876 | Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060042258 | Gadde et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070089424 | Venkataramani et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070113560 | Steber et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125090 | Martis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157624 | Bland et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070214795 | Cooker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070271024 | Fujii et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080229754 | Goebel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090113896 | Fukuda | May 2009 | A1 |
20090281737 | Stadler et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090222187 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |