Patent Grant
8844294
This disclosure generally relates to a gas turbine engine, and more particularly to a nacelle for a turbofan gas turbine engine.
In an aircraft gas turbine engine, such as a turbofan engine, air is pressurized in a compressor and mixed with fuel in a combustor for generating hot combustion gases. The hot combustion gases flow downstream through turbine stages that extract energy from the gases. In a two spool gas turbine engine, a high pressure turbine powers the high pressure compressor, while a low pressure turbine powers a fan disposed upstream of the compressor and a low pressure compressor.
Combustion gases are discharged from the turbofan engine through a core exhaust nozzle, and fan air is discharged through an annular fan exhaust nozzle defined at least partially by a nacelle surrounding the core engine. A majority of propulsion thrust is provided by the pressurized fan air which is discharged through the fan exhaust nozzle, while the remaining thrust provided from the combustion gases is discharged through the core exhaust nozzle.
In high bypass turbofans a majority of the air pressurized by the fan bypasses the turbofan engine for generating propulsion thrust. High bypass turbofans typically use large diameter fans to achieve adequate turbofan engine efficiency. Therefore, the nacelle of the turbofan engine must be large enough to support the large diameter fan of the turbofan engine. The relatively large size of the nacelle results in increased weight and drag that may offset the propulsive efficiency achieved by high bypass turbofan engines.
A gas turbine engine according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes, among other things, a nacelle assembly that includes an inlet lip section and an inlet internal diffuser section downstream of the inlet lip section. A variable area fan nozzle is positioned near an aft segment of the nacelle assembly, the variable area fan nozzle adaptable to move between a first position having a first discharge airflow area and a second position having a second discharge airflow area greater than the first discharge airflow area. At least one boundary layer control device is positioned near one of the inlet lip section and the inlet internal diffuser section. A controller is configured to move the variable area fan nozzle from the first position to the second position and to actuate the at least one boundary layer control device to introduce an airflow in response to an operability condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of the foregoing gas turbine engine, the inlet internal diffuser section extends between a throat of an outer surface of the nacelle assembly and a forward face of a fan.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of either of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the fan includes a variable pitch fan blade.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the controller is configured to move the variable area fan nozzle and actuate the at least one boundary layer control device in response to the operability condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the operability condition includes a windmilling condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the second position of the variable area fan nozzle is at least 20% of the opening capability of the variable area fan nozzle.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the second position of the variable area fan nozzle is at least 10% of the opening capability of the variable area fan nozzle.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the at least one boundary layer control device includes a first boundary layer control device at the inlet lip section and a second boundary layer control device at the inlet internal diffuser section.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, the variable area fan nozzle includes a synchronizing ring, a static ring and a flap assembly.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engines, a sensor is configured to detect the operability condition.
A gas turbine engine method according to another exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes, among other things, sensing an operability condition, increasing a discharge airflow area of a variable area fan nozzle and introducing an airflow at a surface of a nacelle assembly. The steps of increasing and introducing are performed in response to the operability condition from the sensing step.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of the foregoing method, the operability condition includes a windmilling condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of either of the foregoing methods, the steps of increasing and introducing are performed in response to the operability condition from the sensing step.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing methods, the method includes returning the variable area fan nozzle to its original position during a second operability condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing methods, the method of increasing includes moving the variable area fan nozzle between a first position and a second position that is at least 20% of its opening capability if the operability condition is a windmilling condition or a static condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing methods, the method of increasing includes moving the variable area fan nozzle between a first position and a second position that is at least 10% of its opening capability if the operability condition is a crosswind condition or a high angle of attack condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing methods, the method of introducing is not performed if the operability condition is a cruise condition.
A method of designing a gas turbine engine according to another exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes, among other things, providing a nacelle assembly that includes an inlet lip section and an inlet internal diffuser section downstream of the inlet lip section, positioning a variable area fan nozzle near an aft segment of the nacelle assembly, the variable area fan nozzle adaptable to move between a first position having a first discharge airflow area and a second position having a second discharge airflow area greater than the first discharge airflow area. The method additionally includes positioning at least one boundary layer control device near one of the inlet lip section and the inlet internal diffuser section and moving the variable area fan nozzle from the first position to the second position and actuating the at least one boundary layer control device to introduce an airflow in response to an operability condition.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of the foregoing method, the method includes sensing the operability condition prior to the moving step.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of either of the foregoing methods, the method includes providing a controller configured to move the variable area fan nozzle and to actuate the at least one boundary layer control device.
The various features and advantages of this disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
Referring to
The gas turbine engine 10 is in the form of a high bypass ratio turbofan engine mounted within a nacelle assembly 26, in which most of the air pressurized by the fan 14 bypasses the core engine itself for the generation of propulsion thrust. The nacelle assembly 26 includes a fan cowl 46 and a core cowl 28 within the fan cowl 46. Fan discharge airflow F1 is discharged from the engine 10 through a variable area fan nozzle (VAFN) 30 defined radially between the core cowl 28 and the fan cowl 46. Core exhaust gases C are discharged from the core engine through a core exhaust nozzle 32 defined between the core cowl 28 and a center plug 34 disposed coaxially therein around a longitudinal centerline axis A of the gas turbine engine 10.
The VAFN 30 concentrically surrounds the core cowl 28 near an aftmost segment 29 of the nacelle assembly 26. The VAFN 30 of the nacelle assembly 26 defines a fan-nozzle discharge airflow area 36 (
Referring to
The maximum diameter Dmax of the nacelle assembly 26 may be established by Extended-Range Twin-Engine Operational Performance Standards (ETOPS) requirements, in which an external airflow F2 over the fan cowl 46 is required to remain separation free under an engine-out windmilling condition or other condition. ETOPS requirements are aircraft performance standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organization. It is desirable from an engine efficiency standpoint for the external airflow F2 to maintain attached to the fan cowl 46 during aircraft operation. A windmilling condition occurs where an engine of a twin-engine aircraft loses functionality (i.e. engine out condition). The damaged engine is advantageously permitted to rotate, and is driven by an airflow resulting from the forward velocity of the aircraft (i.e., the damaged engine is permitted to “windmill”).
A diameter ratio, or the ratio of the highlight diameter Dh to the maximum diameter Dmax, is utilized to determine whether the nacelle assembly 26 achieves this ETOPS requirement and maintains an external airflow F2 which is separation free from the fan cowl 46. Current industry standards typically use a diameter ratio of at least approximately 0.80 to achieve a separation free airflow, but other diameter ratios may be feasible.
The nacelle assembly 26 also defines a contraction ratio. The contraction ratio represents a relative thickness of the inlet lip section 38 of the nacelle assembly 26 and is represented by the ratio of a highlight area Ha (ring-shaped area defined by highlight diameter Dh) and a throat area Ta (ring-shaped area defined by throat diameter Dt) of the nacelle assembly 26. Current industry standards typically use a contraction ratio of approximately 1.300 to prevent the separation of the fan discharge airflow F1 from an interior wall 59 of the fan cowl 46, but other contraction ratios may be feasible. “Thick” inlet lip section designs, which are associated with large contraction ratios, increase the maximum diameter and increase the weight and the drag penalties associated with the nacelle assembly 26. The nacelle assembly 26 further defines an inlet lip length Llip and a fan duct length Lfan.
Increasing the fan discharge airflow F1 during specific flight conditions allows the external airflow F2 to remain separation free from the fan cowl 46 while achieving a slim-line nacelle design. In one example, the increased fan discharge airflow F1 is achieved by providing the gas turbine engine 10 with a VAFN 30 and increasing the discharge airflow area 36 of the VAFN 30 during the specific flight conditions.
In one example, the increase in the discharge airflow area 36 is achieved by opening the VAFN 30. For example, the VAFN 30 generally includes a synchronizing ring 41, a static ring 43, and a flap assembly 45 (See
The increase in the discharge airflow area 36 is achieved by moving the VAFN 30 from a first position to a second (or open) position X (represented by dashed lines in
The opening of the VAFN 30 during windmilling conditions allows for a reduction in the maximum diameter Dmax of the nacelle assembly 26 while maintaining an external airflow F2 which is separation free from the fan cowl 46. Therefore, the nacelle assembly 26 achieves an improved (i.e. larger) diameter ratio. Further, the improved diameter ratio results in a weight savings and a reduction in nacelle drag (i.e., slim-line nacelle). The VAFN 30 is returned to its first position (represented by solid lines) during normal cruise operation of the aircraft.
Referring to
The first boundary layer control device 52 may introduce the airflow F4 by injection or suction of airflow near the inlet lip section 38. For example, fluid injection jet devices (for injection of airflow) or blowing slots (for suction of airflow) may be provided near the inlet lip section 38 to introduce the airflow F4. It should be understood that the nacelle may include any known boundary layer control technology.
The first boundary layer control device 52 is actuated to generate the airflow F4 in response to detection of at least one operability condition. The operability condition is detected by the sensor 53. The sensor 53 communicates the detection of the operability condition to the controller 55, which then actuates the first boundary layer control device 52 to generate the airflow F4. A person of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to program the sensor 53 and the controller 55 for performing these functions.
In one example, the operability condition includes a static condition. Static conditions occur at low speeds (i.e., just prior to take-off). In another example, the operability condition includes a cross-wind condition. Cross-wind conditions are experienced during takeoff as the aircraft travels down the runway (i.e., where the aircraft experiences airflow in a roughly perpendicular direction with respect to the movement of the aircraft down the runway). In yet another example, the operability condition includes a high angle of attack condition. High angle of attack conditions are experienced where the aircraft is traveling at low speeds and the angle of incidence of the airflow relative to the inlet lip section 38 of the slim line nacelle 50 is relatively large. It should be understood that first boundary layer control device 52 may be controlled during any operability condition experienced by an aircraft during operation.
In addition, the discharge airflow area 36 of the VAFN 30 may be increased simultaneously with the generation of the airflow F4 by the first boundary layer control device 52 during the operability conditions to achieve further weight and drag reductions. In one example, both the VAFN 30 and the boundary layer control device 52 are utilized during all static conditions, cross-wind conditions, and high angle of attack conditions. The controller 55 is programmable to move the VAFN 30 to a position representing approximately 10% of its opening capability during cross-wind conditions and high angle of attack conditions, and to approximately 20% of its opening capability during static conditions. The first boundary layer control device 52 is turned off during windmilling conditions and during normal cruise operation of the aircraft to achieve optimal performance.
The first boundary layer control device 52 and the VAFN 30 may be utilized simultaneously during the operability conditions to achieve a nacelle having a reduced contraction ratio while maintaining non-separation of the fan discharge airflow F1 from the interior wall 59 of the slim line nacelle 50. Therefore, corresponding weight and drag benefits are achieved by the slim-line nacelle 50.
Referring to
The second boundary layer control device 60 is actuated by the controller 55 in response to detection of at least one operability condition. In one example, the second boundary layer control device 60 is utilized to generate the airflow F5 during static conditions, cross-wind conditions, and high angle of attack conditions. Utilization of the second boundary layer control device 60 at the inlet internal diffuser section 40 of the nacelle 58 enables a reduction in the inlet lip length Llip and the fan duct length Lfan, thereby enabling a weight reduction in the nacelle design. The second boundary layer control device 60 is shut off during windmilling conditions and during normal cruise operation of the aircraft.
In one example, the VAFN 30, the first boundary layer control device 52, and the second boundary layer control device 60 are exploited simultaneously during at least one of the operability conditions. In another example, the VAFN 30, the first boundary layer control device 52 and the second boundary layer control device 60 are simultaneously utilized during all static conditions, cross-wind conditions and high angle of attack conditions which are detected by the sensor 53. The slim-line nacelle 58 achieves further drag reduction benefits in response to the simultaneous utilization of all three technologies during diverse flight requirements.
The foregoing description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in any limiting sense. A worker of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this disclosure. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/832,280, filed on Jul. 8, 2010, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/584,030, which was filed on Oct. 20, 2006 and issued on Sep. 21, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,797,944.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2948111 | Nelson | May 1955 | A |
| 2915262 | Klein | Dec 1959 | A |
| 3059878 | Kerry et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3074232 | Soyer | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3119581 | Trevaskis | Jan 1964 | A |
| 3222863 | Klees et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3298637 | Lee | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3422624 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3472027 | Snow et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3524611 | Frank | Aug 1970 | A |
| 3532100 | Hilton | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3541794 | Johnston et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3568694 | Johnson | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3575259 | Wilkinson | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3583417 | Clark | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3611724 | Kutney | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3618699 | Evans | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3623328 | Pike | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3623494 | Poucher | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3652036 | Sans et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3662556 | Poucher et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3664612 | Skidmore et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3699682 | Kleckner | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3716209 | Pierce | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3736750 | Britt | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3763874 | Wilde et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3770228 | Traksel et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3905566 | Anderson | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3932058 | Harner et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 4007891 | Sorensen et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4012013 | Ball et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4044973 | Moorehead | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4055946 | Sens | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4068469 | Adamson | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4083181 | Adamson | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4132240 | Frantz | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4147029 | Sargisson | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4154256 | Miller | May 1979 | A |
| 4199295 | Raffy et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4220171 | Ruehr et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4242864 | Cornett et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4351502 | Statkus | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4475702 | Cole | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4540143 | Wang et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4722357 | Wynosky | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4738416 | Birbragher | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4827712 | Coplin | May 1989 | A |
| 4865268 | Tracksdorf | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4899958 | Horikawa | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4912921 | Rice et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4993663 | Lahti et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5000399 | Readnour et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5012639 | Ream et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5014933 | Harm et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5058617 | Stockman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5127222 | Ream et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5141182 | Coffinberry | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143329 | Coffinberry | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5145126 | Patilla | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5156362 | Leon | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5177957 | Grieb | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5261227 | Giffin, III | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5284012 | Laborie et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5297765 | Hughes et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5351476 | Laborie et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5357742 | Miller | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5361828 | Lee et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5447283 | Tindell | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5568724 | Lindner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5586431 | Thonebe et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593112 | Maier et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5626017 | Saltemayer | May 1997 | A |
| 5665916 | Puster et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5725182 | Valleroy | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727380 | Lardy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732547 | Olsen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5743488 | Rolston et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5803410 | Hwang | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813625 | Hassan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5841079 | Parente | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5934611 | Tindell et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5971328 | Kota | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987880 | Culbetson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6055805 | El-Aini et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6089505 | Gruensfelder et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6109566 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6125626 | El-Aini et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129309 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129311 | Welch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6170253 | Newton | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6179251 | Tindell et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6231006 | Gruensfelder et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6259976 | Lemelson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260567 | Gruensfelder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6334753 | Tillman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6340135 | Barton | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6360989 | Maguire | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6375118 | Kibens et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379110 | McCormick et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6390418 | McCormick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6471477 | Hassan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6651929 | Dionne | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655632 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6698691 | Porte | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6708711 | Surply et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6763651 | Shmilovich et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6764043 | Sankrithi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6793177 | Bonutti | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6971229 | Lair | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7048229 | Sanders et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7048230 | Meyer | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7090165 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7131612 | Baptist et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7165744 | Howarth et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7255309 | Boldrin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7384016 | Kota et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7617670 | Truax et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7735601 | Stieger et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7739865 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7766280 | Cloft et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7802760 | Webster | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7870721 | Winter et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 20040037162 | Flohr et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237534 | Webster et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050060982 | Mani et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274103 | Prasad et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060155432 | Brown | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070214795 | Cooker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070221788 | Meister | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080092548 | Morford et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112799 | Winter et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080267762 | Jain et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283676 | Jain et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286094 | Jain | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003997 | Jain et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090008508 | Jain et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090121083 | Jain | May 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 980347 | Dec 1950 | FR |
| 1070458 | Jun 1967 | GB |
| 1312619 | Apr 1973 | GB |
| 1336724 | Nov 1973 | GB |
| 1382809 | Feb 1975 | GB |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 25 2429 dated Nov. 26, 2008. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 25 4305 Dated Aug. 19, 2011. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 25 1047 dated Sep. 6, 2011. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 25 2263 dated Aug. 19, 2011. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 08 25 3874 dated Jan. 25, 2012. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140216002 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11584030 | Oct 2006 | US |
| Child | 12832280 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12832280 | Jul 2010 | US |
| Child | 14248444 | US |
