1. Technical Field
The disclosure generally relates to gas turbine engines.
2. Description of the Related Art
Gas turbine engines incorporate casings that are designed to encase internal components. These casings typically are attached to structural support members (e.g., struts) that extend inwardly from the casings and which are used to support the components. For example, solid struts can be used that incorporate aerodynamic fairings for facilitating airflow about the struts. As another example, hollow, box-type struts are used that incorporate aerodynamically desirable exterior shapes. These struts tend to increase stiffness while reducing weight because an associated fairing is not used.
Gas turbine engine systems involving I-beam struts are provided. In this regard, an exemplary embodiment of a gas turbine engine comprises: a compressor; a combustion section operative to receive compressed air from the compressor; a turbine operative to drive the compressor; a casing operative to encase the compressor, the combustion section and the turbine; and a strut assembly interconnected with the casing and having a first strut configured as an I-beam.
An exemplary embodiment of a gas turbine engine exhaust casing comprises multiple struts, a first of the struts being configured as an I-beam having a web, a first flange located along a leading edge of the web, and a second flange located along a trailing edge of the web, the web extending between a first end and a second end, the first of the struts exhibiting a twist along a length thereof such that the first end and the second end form an included angle of between approximately 1° and approximately 45°.
An exemplary embodiment of a strut assembly for a gas turbine engine comprises a first I-beam strut having first and second flanges spaced from each other and interconnected by a web, the first strut exhibiting a twist along a length of the web.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages of this disclosure will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be within the scope of the present disclosure.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Gas turbine engine systems involving I-beam struts are provided, several representative embodiments of which will be described. In this regard,
As shown in
Engine 100 also incorporates trunnions (e.g. trunnion 120) that are used to mount the gas turbine engine to another component, such as a nacelle. Notably, forces imparted to the casing via the trunnions tend to be non-axial. Therefore, strut assemblies typically are provided with increased material thickness in order to accommodate such forces.
As shown in
In this embodiment, strut incorporates a consistent twist per unit length. This results in the chords 312, 314 defining an included angle (θ) of between approximately 1° and approximately 45°, preferably between approximately 5° and approximately 30°. Although the strut of
The degree of twist per unit length of a strut is selected based, at least in part, on one or more of a number of considerations. Such considerations may include, but are not limited to: packaging constraints that define the available area for strut placement; matching the aerodynamic airfoil shape required to support turbine exhaust conditions; aerodynamic cooling requirements for changing and/or distributing available flow area; and providing structural support for trunnion loading. Notably, twist can be used to balance lateral and trunnion stiffness of an engine case per the art of balancing engine rotordynamics.
Another embodiment of a strut assembly is depicted in the schematic diagram of
In
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of
In contrast to a conventional box-type strut that functions as a structural support as well as an aerodynamic component, the strut assembly of
It should be noted that I-beam struts potentially exhibit reduced weight compared to non-I-Beam struts that provide comparable strength and/or stiffness. Also, I-beam struts potentially reduce aerodynamic restrictions along gas flow paths as the struts may be narrower than non-I-Beam struts of comparable strength and/or stiffness. Additionally, material can be removed from the webs of I-beam struts (such as to provide passthroughs) without significantly impacting the structural integrity of the struts. Further, use of I-beam struts may allow for selective reinforcement of assemblies in which the struts are incorporated. By way of example, outer ring 404 of the ring-strut-ring assembly of
As is also shown in more detail in
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments are merely possible examples of implementations set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of this disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the accompanying claims.
The U.S. Government may have an interest in the subject matter of this disclosure as provided for by the terms of contract number N00019-02-C3003 awarded by the United States Navy.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3312448 | Hull et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3826088 | Nash et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
4429923 | White et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4659289 | Kalogeros | Apr 1987 | A |
4820117 | Larrabee et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5292227 | Czachor et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5427348 | Bacon et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5634767 | Dawson | Jun 1997 | A |
5672047 | Birkholz | Sep 1997 | A |
6439841 | Bosel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6792758 | Dowman | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7100358 | Gekht et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7186073 | Orlando et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100307165 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |