The present invention relates to a gas turbine engine and more particularly to an engine mounting configuration for the mounting of a turbofan gas turbine engine to an aircraft pylon.
A gas turbine engine may be mounted at various points on an aircraft such as a pylon integrated with an aircraft structure. An engine mounting configuration ensures the transmission of loads between the engine and the aircraft structure. The loads typically include the weight of the engine, thrust, aerodynamic side loads, and rotary torque about the engine axis. The engine mount configuration must also absorb the deformations to which the engine is subjected during different flight phases and the dimensional variations due to thermal expansion and retraction.
One conventional engine mounting configuration includes a pylon having a forward mount and an aft mount with relatively long thrust links which extend forward from the aft mount to the engine intermediate case structure. Although effective, one disadvantage of this conventional type mounting arrangement is the relatively large “punch loads” into the engine cases from the thrust links which react the thrust from the engine and couple the thrust to the pylon. These loads tend to distort the intermediate case and the low pressure compressor (LPC) cases. The distortion may cause the clearances between the static cases and rotating blade tips to increase which may negatively affect engine performance and increase fuel burn.
A gas turbine engine according to an exemplary aspect of the present disclosure includes a core nacelle defined about an engine centerline axis, a fan nacelle mounted at least partially around the core nacelle to define a fan bypass airflow path for a fan bypass airflow, a gear train defined along an engine centerline axis, the gear train defines a gear reduction ratio of greater than or equal to about 2.3, a spool along the engine centerline axis which drives the gear train, the spool includes a three to six (3-6) low pressure turbine, and a fan variable area nozzle axially movable relative to the fan nacelle to vary a fan nozzle exit area and adjust a pressure ratio of the fan bypass airflow during engine operation.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the gear train may define a gear reduction ratio of greater than or equal to about 2.5.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the engine may further include a controller operable to control the fan variable area nozzle to vary the fan nozzle exit area and adjust the pressure ratio of the fan bypass airflow.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the controller may be operable to reduce the fan nozzle exit area at a cruise flight condition. Additionally or alternatively, the controller may be operable to control the fan nozzle exit area to reduce a fan instability.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the fan variable area nozzle may define a trailing edge of the fan nacelle.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the gear train may drive a fan within the fan nacelle.
In a further non-limiting embodiment of any of the foregoing gas turbine engine embodiments, the low pressure turbine may be a five (5) stage low pressure turbine.
In a featured embodiment, a gas turbine engine comprises a gear train defined along an axis. A spool along the axis drives the gear train and includes a low stage count low pressure turbine. A fan is rotatable at a fan speed about the axis and driven by the low pressure turbine through the gear train. The fan speed is less than a speed of the low pressure turbine. A core is surrounded by a core nacelle defined about the axis. A fan nacelle is mounted at least partially around the core nacelle to define a fan bypass airflow path for a fan bypass airflow. A bypass ratio defined by the fan bypass passage airflow divided by airflow through the core is greater than about ten (10).
In another embodiment according to the previous embodiment, the low stage count includes six or fewer stages.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the low pressure turbine is one of three turbine rotors. The low pressure turbine drives the fan, while the other two of the turbine rotors each drive a compressor section.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, a high pressure turbine is also included, with each of the low pressure turbine and the high pressure turbine driving a compressor rotor.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the gear train is positioned intermediate a compressor rotor driven by the low pressure turbine and the fan.
In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the gear train is positioned intermediate the low pressure turbine and the compressor rotor is driven by the low pressure turbine.
Although the different examples have the specific components shown in the illustrations, embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from one of the examples in combination with features or components from another one of the examples.
These and other features disclosed herein can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently disclosed embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
and
The turbofan engine 10 includes a core engine within a core nacelle C that houses a low spool 14 and high spool 24. The low spool 14 includes a low pressure compressor 16 and low pressure turbine 18. The low spool 14 drives a fan section 20 connected to the low spool 14 either directly or through a gear train 25.
The high spool 24 includes a high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. A combustor 30 is arranged between the high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. The low and high spools 14, 24 rotate about an engine axis of rotation A.
The engine 10 in one non-limiting embodiment is a high-bypass geared architecture aircraft engine. In one disclosed, non-limiting embodiment, the engine 10 bypass ratio is greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10), the gear train 25 is an epicyclic gear train such as a planetary gear system or other gear system with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3 and the low pressure turbine 18 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about 5. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 10 bypass ratio is greater than ten (10:1), the turbofan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 16, and the low pressure turbine 18 has a pressure ratio that is greater than 5:1. The gear train 25 may be an epicycle gear train such as a planetary gear system or other gear system with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.5:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.
Airflow enters the fan nacelle F which at least partially surrounds the core nacelle C. The fan section 20 communicates airflow into the core nacelle C to the low pressure compressor 16. Core airflow compressed by the low pressure compressor 16 and the high pressure compressor 26 is mixed with the fuel in the combustor 30 where is ignited, and burned. The resultant high pressure combustor products are expanded through the high pressure turbine 28 and low pressure turbine 18. The turbines 28, 18 are rotationally coupled to the compressors 26, 16 respectively to drive the compressors 26, 16 in response to the expansion of the combustor product. The low pressure turbine 18 also drives the fan section 20 through gear train 25. A core engine exhaust E exits the core nacelle C through a core nozzle 43 defined between the core nacelle C and a tail cone 33.
With reference to
Thrust is a function of density, velocity, and area. One or more of these parameters can be manipulated to vary the amount and direction of thrust provided by the bypass flow B. The Variable Area Fan Nozzle (“VAFN”) 42 operates to effectively vary the area of the fan nozzle exit area 45 to selectively adjust the pressure ratio of the bypass flow B in response to a controller (not shown). Low pressure ratio turbofans are desirable for their high propulsive efficiency. However, low pressure ratio fans may be inherently susceptible to fan stability/flutter problems at low power and low flight speeds. The VAFN 42 allows the engine to change to a more favorable fan operating line at low power, avoiding the instability region, and still provide the relatively smaller nozzle area necessary to obtain a high-efficiency fan operating line at cruise.
A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 20 of the engine 10 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet. The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft, with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (‘TSFC’)”—is the industry standard parameter of lbm of fuel being burned divided by lbf of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point. “Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without the Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system 36. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.45. “Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tambient deg R)/518.7)^0.5]. The “Low corrected fan tip speed” as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1150 ft/second.
As the fan blades within the fan section 20 are efficiently designed at a particular fixed stagger angle for an efficient cruise condition, the VAFN 42 is operated to effectively vary the fan nozzle exit area 45 to adjust fan bypass air flow such that the angle of attack or incidence on the fan blades is maintained close to the design incidence for efficient engine operation at other flight conditions, such as landing and takeoff to thus provide optimized engine operation over a range of flight conditions with respect to performance and other operational parameters such as noise levels.
The engine static structure 44 generally has sub-structures including a case structure often referred to as the engine backbone. The engine static structure 44 generally includes a fan case 46, an intermediate case (IMC) 48, a high pressure compressor case 50, a combustor case 52A, a high pressure turbine case 52B, a thrust case 52C, a low pressure turbine case 54, and a turbine exhaust case 56 (
The fan section 20 includes a fan rotor 32 with a plurality of circumferentially spaced radially outwardly extending fan blades 34. The fan blades 34 are surrounded by the fan case 46. The core engine case structure is secured to the fan case 46 at the IMC 48 which includes a multiple of circumferentially spaced radially extending struts 40 which radially span the core engine case structure and the fan case 46.
The engine static structure 44 further supports a bearing system upon which the turbines 28, 18, compressors 26, 16 and fan rotor 32 rotate. A #1 fan dual bearing 60 which rotationally supports the fan rotor 32 is axially located generally within the fan case 46. The #1 fan dual bearing 60 is preloaded to react fan thrust forward and aft (in case of surge). A #2 LPC bearing 62 which rotationally supports the low spool 14 is axially located generally within the intermediate case (IMC) 48. The #2 LPC bearing 62 reacts thrust. A #3 fan dual bearing 64 which rotationally supports the high spool 24 and also reacts thrust. The #3 fan bearing 64 is also axially located generally within the IMC 48 just forward of the high pressure compressor case 50. A #4 bearing 66 which rotationally supports a rear segment of the low spool 14 reacts only radial loads. The #4 bearing 66 is axially located generally within the thrust case 52C in an aft section thereof. A #5 bearing 68 rotationally supports the rear segment of the low spool 14 and reacts only radial loads. The #5 bearing 68 is axially located generally within the thrust case 52C just aft of the #4 bearing 66. It should be understood that this is an exemplary configuration and any number of bearings may be utilized.
The #4 bearing 66 and the #5 bearing 68 are supported within a mid-turbine frame (MTF) 70 to straddle radially extending structural struts 72 which are preloaded in tension (
A dual rotor engine such as that disclosed in the illustrated embodiment typically includes a forward frame and a rear frame that support the main rotor bearings. The intermediate case (IMC) 48 also includes the radially extending struts 40 which are generally radially aligned with the #2 LPC bearing 62 (
The turbofan gas turbine engine 10 is mounted to aircraft structure such as an aircraft wing through a mount system 80 attachable by the pylon 12. The mount system 80 includes a forward mount 82 and an aft mount 84 (
Referring to
The forward mount 82 supports vertical loads and side loads. The forward mount 82 in one non-limiting embodiment includes a shackle arrangement which mounts to the IMC 48 at two points 86A. 86B. The forward mount 82 is generally a plate-like member which is oriented transverse to the plane which contains engine axis A. Fasteners are oriented through the forward mount 82 to engage the intermediate case (IMC) 48 generally parallel to the engine axis A. In this illustrated non-limiting embodiment, the forward mount 82 is secured to the IMC 48. In another non-limiting embodiment, the forward mount 82 is secured to a portion of the core engine, such as the high-pressure compressor case 50 of the gas turbine engine 10 (see
Referring to
Referring to
The first A-arm 88A and the second A-arm 88B of the aft mount 84 force the resultant thrust vector at the engine casing to be reacted along the engine axis A which minimizes tip clearance losses due to engine loading at the aft mount 84. This minimizes blade tip clearance requirements and thereby improves engine performance.
The whiffle tree assembly 92 includes a whiffle link 98 which supports a central ball joint 100, a first sliding ball joint 102A and a second sliding ball joint 102B (
The drag link 94 includes a ball joint 104A mounted to the thrust case 52C and ball joint 104B mounted to the rear mount platform 90 (
The aft mount 84 transmits engine loads directly to the thrust case 52C and the MTF 70. Thrust, vertical, side, and torque loads are transmitted directly from the MTF 70 which reduces the number of structural members as compared to current in-practice designs.
The mount system 80 is compact, and occupies space within the core nacelle volume as compared to turbine exhaust case-mounted configurations, which occupy space outside of the core nacelle which may require additional or relatively larger aerodynamic fairings and increase aerodynamic drag and fuel consumption. The mount system 80 eliminates the heretofore required thrust links from the IMC, which frees up valuable space adjacent the IMC 48 and the high pressure compressor case 50 within the core nacelle C.
It should be understood that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The disclosed embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
The present disclosure is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/755,221, filed Jun. 30, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/190,429, filed Feb. 26, 2014, which was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/340,988, filed Dec. 30, 2011, which was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/131,876, filed Jun. 2, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2258792 | New | Oct 1941 | A |
2608821 | Hunsaker | Sep 1952 | A |
2748623 | Hill | Jun 1956 | A |
2936655 | Peterson | May 1960 | A |
3021731 | Stoeckicht | Feb 1962 | A |
3033002 | Davis | May 1962 | A |
3111005 | Howell et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3185857 | Johnson | May 1965 | A |
3194487 | Tyler | Jul 1965 | A |
3287906 | McCormick | Nov 1966 | A |
3352178 | Lindgren | Nov 1967 | A |
3363419 | Wilde | Jan 1968 | A |
3412560 | Gaubatz | Nov 1968 | A |
3468473 | Davies et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3526092 | Steel | Sep 1970 | A |
3729957 | Petrie et al. | May 1973 | A |
3747343 | Rosen | Jul 1973 | A |
3754484 | Roberts | Aug 1973 | A |
3779010 | Chamay | Dec 1973 | A |
3820719 | Clark | Jun 1974 | A |
3861139 | Jones | Jan 1975 | A |
3886737 | Grieb | Jun 1975 | A |
3892358 | Gisslen | Jul 1975 | A |
3932058 | Harner et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3935558 | Miller et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3988889 | Chamay et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4118927 | Kronogard | Oct 1978 | A |
4130872 | Harloff | Dec 1978 | A |
4136286 | O'Halloran et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4137708 | Aspinwall | Feb 1979 | A |
4233555 | Roche | Nov 1980 | A |
4284174 | Salvana et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4405892 | Staerzl | Sep 1983 | A |
4452567 | Treby et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4463553 | Boudigues | Aug 1984 | A |
4478551 | Honeycutt, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4649114 | Miltenburger et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660376 | Johnson | Apr 1987 | A |
4696156 | Burr et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4704862 | Dennison | Nov 1987 | A |
4808076 | Jarmon et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809498 | Giffin, III et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4827712 | Coplin | May 1989 | A |
4879624 | Jones et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885912 | Nakhamkin | Dec 1989 | A |
4966338 | Gordon | Oct 1990 | A |
4979362 | Vershure, Jr. | Dec 1990 | A |
5074109 | Mandet et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079916 | Johnson | Jan 1992 | A |
5081832 | Mowill | Jan 1992 | A |
5102379 | Pagluica et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5136839 | Armstrong | Aug 1992 | A |
5141400 | Murphy et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168208 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174525 | Schilling | Dec 1992 | A |
5182464 | Woodworth et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5252905 | Wills et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273393 | Jones et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275357 | Seelan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5277382 | Seelan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5307622 | Ciokajlo et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317877 | Stuart | Jun 1994 | A |
5320307 | Spofford et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5372338 | Carlin | Dec 1994 | A |
5388964 | Ciokajlo et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390068 | Schultz et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5409184 | Udall et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5433674 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443229 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447411 | Curley et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452575 | Freid | Sep 1995 | A |
5466198 | McKibbin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474258 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497961 | Newton | Mar 1996 | A |
5524847 | Brodell et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5594665 | Walter | Jan 1997 | A |
5677060 | Terentieva et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694027 | Satake et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694765 | Hield et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5729059 | Kilroy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734555 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740668 | Fujiwara et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746391 | Rodgers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754033 | Thomson | May 1998 | A |
5778659 | Duesler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791789 | Van Duyn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806303 | Johnson | Sep 1998 | A |
5810287 | O'Boyle et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857836 | Stickler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860276 | Newton | Jan 1999 | A |
5871175 | Demouzon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871176 | Demouzon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871177 | Demouzon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886890 | Ishida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915917 | Eveker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921500 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927644 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949153 | Tison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5975841 | Lindemuth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985470 | Spitsberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6073439 | Beaven et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104171 | Dvorsky et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126110 | Seaquist et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138949 | Manende et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6189830 | Schnelz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209311 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223616 | Sheridan | May 2001 | B1 |
6260351 | Delano et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315815 | Spadaccini et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318070 | Rey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339927 | DiPietro, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6378308 | Pfluger | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387456 | Eaton, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398161 | Jule | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6474597 | Cazanave | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517027 | Abruzzese | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517341 | Brun et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6555929 | Eaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6607165 | Manteiga et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6619030 | Seda et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631310 | Leslie | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639331 | Schultz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647707 | Dev | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652222 | Wojtyczka et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653821 | Kern et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657416 | Kern et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663530 | Poulin et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668629 | Leslie | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669393 | Schilling | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6708482 | Seda | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708925 | Udall | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709492 | Spadaccini et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732502 | Seda et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735954 | MacFarlane et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6763653 | Orlando et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6792759 | Rollins, III | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814541 | Evans et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6843449 | Manteiga et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847297 | Lavoie et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855089 | Poulin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6892115 | Berkcan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895741 | Rago et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899518 | Lucas et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6909942 | Andarawis et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914763 | Reedy | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935591 | Udall | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6966174 | Paul | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976655 | Thompson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985784 | Vandevanter et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999291 | Andarawis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7019495 | Patterson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021042 | Law | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7021585 | Loewenstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043340 | Papallo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055306 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7055330 | Miller | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104918 | Mitrovic | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134286 | Markarian et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144349 | Mitrovic | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147436 | Suciu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7195446 | Seda et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7216475 | Johnson | May 2007 | B2 |
7219490 | Dev | May 2007 | B2 |
7223197 | Poulin et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246484 | Giffin, III et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269938 | Moniz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299621 | Bart et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301738 | Pearlman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309210 | Suciu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328580 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334392 | Moniz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338259 | Shah et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7374403 | Decker et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7406830 | Valentian et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409819 | Henry | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7500365 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513103 | Orlando et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527220 | Dron | May 2009 | B2 |
7557544 | Heinz et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7591754 | Duong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594404 | Somanath et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600370 | Dawson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610763 | Somanath et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632064 | Somanath et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656060 | Algrain | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7662059 | McCune | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665293 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685808 | Orlando et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694505 | Schilling | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704178 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716914 | Schilling | May 2010 | B2 |
7721549 | Baran | May 2010 | B2 |
7762086 | Schwark | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765786 | Klingels et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797946 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806651 | Kennepohl et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815417 | Somanath et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7816813 | Yaguadayev et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824305 | Duong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7832193 | Orlando et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841163 | Welch et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841165 | Orlando et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7871247 | Shah et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882691 | Lemmers, Jr. et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882693 | Schilling | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7926260 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942079 | Russ | May 2011 | B2 |
7942580 | Audart-Noel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7950237 | Grabowski et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959532 | Suciu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997868 | Liang | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8015798 | Norris et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8015828 | Moniz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8061969 | Durocher et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8074440 | Kohlenbberg et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8075261 | Merry et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091371 | Durocher et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104262 | Marshall | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104265 | Kupratis | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8104289 | McCune et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106633 | Dozier et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8128021 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8166748 | Schilling | May 2012 | B2 |
8172717 | Lopez et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191352 | Schilling | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205432 | Sheridan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8220245 | Papandreas | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8256707 | Suciu et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8297916 | McCune et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8297917 | McCune et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8313280 | Hurwitz et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8505432 | Kidd et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8695920 | Suciu et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020172593 | Udall | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030097844 | Seda | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163984 | Seda | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030235523 | Lyubovsky et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050138914 | Paul | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050257528 | Dunbar, Jr. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060029894 | Zinn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060090448 | Henry | May 2006 | A1 |
20060090451 | Moniz | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130456 | Suciu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177302 | Berry | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179818 | Merchant | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060244327 | Kundel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060248900 | Suciu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070084218 | Udall | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070125066 | Orlando et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070205323 | Lionel | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070262661 | Ai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080022653 | Schilling | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056888 | Somanath et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073460 | Beardsley | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080098713 | Orlando et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116009 | Sheridan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116010 | Portlock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148881 | Moniz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149445 | Kern et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169378 | Beaufort | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184694 | Guimbard et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276621 | Somanath et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080304974 | Marshall et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317588 | Grabowski | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007569 | Lemmers, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090053058 | Kohlenberg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056306 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090056343 | Suciu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067993 | Roberge | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097967 | Smith et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090155070 | Duchatelle | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183512 | Suciu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229242 | Schwark | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245997 | Hurwitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090293445 | Ress, Jr. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314881 | Suciu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317229 | Suciu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320488 | Gilson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005810 | Jarrell et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100007207 | Peuser | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100080700 | Venter | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105516 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100126141 | Schilling | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127117 | Combes et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132376 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100132377 | Durocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147997 | Martinou et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148396 | Xie et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154384 | Schilling | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170980 | Haramburu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181419 | Haramburu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212281 | Sheridan | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219779 | Bradbrook | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301617 | Lundbladh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317477 | Sheridan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326050 | Schilling et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331139 | McCune | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110056208 | Norris et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106510 | Poon | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114786 | Guillet et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116510 | Breslin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120078 | Schwark | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120081 | Schwark | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130246 | McCune et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149624 | Yamanaka | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167790 | Cloft | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120007431 | Jang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017603 | Bart et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130011547 | Girard et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130115476 | Castle et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0791383 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1142850 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1956224 | Aug 2008 | EP |
1959114 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2009249 | Dec 2008 | EP |
0860593 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2028359 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2098704 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2157305 | Feb 2010 | EP |
1309721 | Mar 1973 | GB |
1516041 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2041090 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2130340 | May 1984 | GB |
2199375 | Jul 1988 | GB |
2419639 | May 2006 | GB |
2426792 | Dec 2006 | GB |
2007038674 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008045058 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008045072 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wendus, et al., “Follow-On Technology Requirement Study for Advanced Subsonic Transport”, NASA/CR-2003-212467, Aug. 2003. |
Ahmad, et al., “Single vs. Two Stage High Pressure Turbine Design of Modern Aero Engines”, ASME 99-GT-1, 1999. Accessed from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org on Aug. 1, 2016. |
“Epicyclic gearing”. (Oct. 23, 2007). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 22:55, Sep. 6, 2017, from waybackmachine.com https://web.archive.org/web/20071023023829/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/epicyclic_gearing. |
Huff, D.L. Technologies for aircraft noise reduction. NASA Glenn Research Center. West Park Airport Committee Meeting. Feb. 16, 2006. pp. 1-23. |
Hill, P.G. and Peterson, C.R. (1965). Mechanics and thermodynamics of propulsion. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. pp. 307-308. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/072271 dated Jul. 10, 2014. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 12863186.8, dated Oct. 29, 2014. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 12196028.0 dated Jun. 23, 2014. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 12197866.2 dated Aug. 20, 2014. |
Ciepluch et al. NASA Conference Publication. Quiet, powered-lift propulsion. Cleveland, Ohio. Nov. 14-15, 1978. |
Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications. Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005). Retrieved from: http://www.jet-engine.net/civtfspec.html. |
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8), p. 32. |
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710. |
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883. |
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 15171345.0 dated Oct. 9, 2015. |
Riegler, C. and Bichlmaier, C. (2007). The geared turbofan technology—opportunities, challenges and readiness stauts. Proceedings of the 1st CEAS European Air and Space Conference, Germany, German Society for Aeronautics and Astronautics (D, Sep. 11, 2007). |
Engber, M. et al. (2007). Advanced technologies for next generation regional jets—survey of research activities at MTU Aero Engines. Proceedings of the 18th ISABE Conference, China, International Society of Airbreathing Engines (ISA, Sep. 7, 2007). p. 1-11. |
Berton, J.J. and Envia, E. (2010). An analytical assessment of NASA's N+1 subsonic fixed wing project noise goal. NASA/TM-2010-216085, the United States, (AIAA, Feb. 1, 2010). |
Roux, E. (2007). Turbofan and turbojet engines database handbook. Editions Elodie Roux. Blagnac: France. pp. 1-595. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/832,107, dated Aug. 1, 2007, Engine Mounting Configuration for a Turbofan Gas Turbine Engine. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/072271 dated Mar. 8, 2013. |
Sessions, R. (1985). Turbo Hydra-Matic 350 handbook. The Berkley Publishing Group. pp. 24-25. |
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012. |
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Lord, W.K. (2000). Flow control opportunities in gas turbine engines. AIAA 2000-2234, Fluids 2000, Denver, Colorado. Jun. 19-22, 2000. pp. 1-15. |
Baskharone, E. (2006). Principles of turbomachinery in air-breathing engines. Cambridge University Press. pp. 261-263. |
Nagendra, S. (2005). Optimal rapid multidisciplinary response networks: RAPIDDISK. Stuct Multidisk Optim 29, pp. 213-231. |
Guha, A. (2001). Optimum fan pressure ration for bypass engines with separate or mixed exhaust streams. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 17(5). Sep.-Oct. |
Web Article. GE's breakthrough GEnx debuts at the Paris Air Show. Jun. 15, 2009. Retrieved Jan. 23, 2012 from: http://www.gereports.com/ges-breakthrough-genx-debuts-at-the-paris-air-show/. |
Web Article. GE Aviation. GEnx-28 first engine to test. Retrieved Jan. 28, 2012 from: http://www.geaviation.com/engines/commercial/genx/2b_fett.html. |
Diagram of prior art V2500 and PW4090 engines. |
Mattingly, J.D. (2002). Aircraft engine design. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2nd Edition, p. 292. |
Kjelgaard, C. (2010). Gear up for the GTF. Aircraft Technology, 105. Apr.-May 2010. pp. 86, 88, 90, 92-95. |
Ruach, D. (1972). Design study of an air pump and integral lift engine ALF-504 using the Lycoming 502 core. NASA Report CR-120992. NASA Lewis Research Center. Cleveland, OH. 1972. pp. 1-182. |
Warwick, G. (2007). Civil engines: Pratt & Whitney gears up for the future with GTF. Flight International, Nov. 2007. Retrieved Jun. 14, 2016 from: https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/civil-engines-pratt-amp-whitney-gears-up-for-the-future-with-219989/. |
Coy, Peter. The little gear that could reshape the jet engine: A simple idea's almost 30-year, $10 billion journey oto the aircraft mainstream. Bloomberg Business. Oct. 15, 2015. p. 1-4. |
Read, B. (2014). Powerplant revolution. AeroSpace. May 2014. pp. 28-31. |
Gunston, B. Ed. (2000). Jane's aero-engines. Issue Seven. Jane's Information Group, Inc. Alexandria, VA. pp. 1-47, 61, and 464-512. |
Boggia, S. and Rud, K. (2005). Intercooled recuperated gas turbine engine concept. AIAA 2005-4192, 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Jul. 10-13, 2005, Tucson, Arizona, p. 1-11. |
Lord, W.K. (2000). P&W expectations. Quiet Aircraft Technology Workshop, Dallas, TX. Apr. 11-12, 2000. pp. 1-7. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605, Claims 1-6 and 12-16. General Electric Company, Petitioner v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. Filed Jan. 29, 2016. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605, Claims 1,2, and 7-11. General Electric Company, Petitioner v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. Filed Jan. 29, 2016. |
Declaration of Reza Abhari, Ph.D in connection with the petition for inter partes review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605 (challenged claims 1-6 and 12-16) executed Jan. 12, 2016. |
Declaration of Reza Abhari, Ph.D in connection with the petition for inter partes review for U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605 (challenged claims 1,2, and 7-11) executed Jan. 12, 2016. |
Wilfert, G. (2008). Geared fan. Aero-Engine Design: From State of the Art Turbofans Towards Innovative Architectures, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium, Mar. 3-7, 2008. pp. 1-26. |
Brochure. LEAP: The power of the future. 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.cfmaeroengines.com. |
McMillian, A. (2008) Material development for fan blade containment casing. Abstract. p. 1. Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006. |
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida. pp. 145-153. |
Agarwal, B.D and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York. pp. 1-30, 50-1, 56-8, 60-1, 64-71, 87-9, 324-9, 436-7. |
Carney, K., Pereira, M. Revilock, and Matheny, P. (2003). Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. pp. 1-10. |
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 108(8), 65-67. |
Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe and science technology. Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-60. |
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998. |
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.C., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in NASA's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007. |
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modem Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case pp. 1-4. |
Hall, C.A. and Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, 479-487. |
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37(20), 1821-1837. |
Brennan, P.J. and Kroliczek, E.J. (1979). Heat pipe design handbook. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration by B & K Engineering, Inc. Jun. 1979. pp. 1-348. |
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 1-24. |
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. p. 11. |
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233. pp. 1-31. |
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987. pp. 1-23. |
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report. NASA/CR-159473 pp. 1-289. |
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189. |
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 465. |
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978. pp. 39-43. |
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995. pp. 3-9. |
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. pp. 341-344. |
Lau, K., Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436. |
Shorter Oxford English dictionary, 6th Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888. |
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 145, 355-358. |
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25. |
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 8-15. |
Pyrograf-III Carbon Nanofiber. Product guide. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2015 from: http://pyrografproducts.com/Merchant5/merchant.mvc?Screen=cp_nanofiber. |
Nanocor Technical Data for Epoxy Nanocomposites using Nanomer 1.30E Nanoclay. Nnacor, Inc. Oct. 2004. |
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers. pp. 187-216. |
Wendus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport. NASA/CR-2003-212467. pp. 1-37. |
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M. The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994.pp. 1-7. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126. |
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010. pp. 1-8. |
Gliebe, P.R. and Janardan, B.A. (2003). Ultra-high bypass engine aeroacoustic study. NASA/CR-2003-21252. GE Aircraft Engines, Cincinnati, Ohio. Oct. 2003. pp. 1-103. |
Moxon, J. How to save fuel in tomorrow's engines. Flight International. Jul. 30, 1983. 3873(124). pp. 272-273. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876. |
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 12-15, 1983. pp. 1-12. |
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. pp. 510-512. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012. |
Ivchenko-Progress AI-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007. |
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009. |
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010. |
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010. |
Edkins, D.P. and Hirschkron, R.L. (1972). TF34 turbofan quiet engine study final report. NASA CR-120914. Dec. 31, 1972. pp. 1-96. |
Declaration of Reza Abhari. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920. Executed Nov. 30. pp. 1-67. |
Declaration of Reza Abhari. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,448,895. Executed Nov. 28. pp. 1-81. |
Declaration of Reza Abhari. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920, claims 1-4, 7-14, 17 and 19. Executed Nov. 29. pp. 1-102. |
Declaration of Dr. Magdy Attia. In re U.S. Pat. No. 88,313,280. Executed Oct. 21, 2016. pp. 1-88. |
Daly, M. Ed. (2010). Jane's Aero-Engine. Issue Twenty-seven. Mar. 2010. p. 633-636. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review. General Electric Co., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2016-00531. U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605. Entered Jun. 30, 2016. pp. 1-16. |
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982. |
Muni, R. (1981). Aircraft technology assessment: Progress in low emissions engine. Technical Report. May 1981. pp. 1-171. |
Waters, M.H. and Schairer, E.T. (1977). Analysis of turbofan propulsion system weight and dimensions. NASA Technical Memorandum. Jan. 1977. pp. 1-65. |
Avco Lycoming Divison. ALF 502L Maintenance Manual. Apr. 1981. pp. 1-118. |
Type Certificate Data Sheet No. E6NE. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration. Jun. 7, 2002. pp. 1-10. |
Trembley, Jr., H.F. (1977). Determination of effects of ambient conditions on aircraft engine emissions. Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency. Ann Arbor, Michigan. Sep. 1977 pp. 1-256. |
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Aug. 17, 2016. |
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972. pp. 1-12. |
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. pp. 1-9. |
Rauch, D. (1972). Design study of an air pump and integral lift engine ALF-504 using the Lycoming 502 core. Prepare for NASA. Jul. 1972. pp. 1-182. |
Dassault Falcon 900EX Easy Systems Summary. Retrieved from: http://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/F900EX-Engines.pdf pp. 1-31. |
Honeywell TFE731 Pilot Tips. pp. 1-143. |
Honeywell TFE731-5AR to -5BR Engine Conversion Program. Sep. 2005. pp. 1-4. |
Garret TFE731 Turbofan Engine (CAT C). Chapter 79: Lubrciation System. TTFE731 Issue 2. 2010. pp. 1-24. |
Notice of Opposition to Patent No. EP 2610460. United Technologies Corporation opposed by SNECMA. Mailed Apr. 27, 2016. |
Patentee's Request to Notice of Opposition to U.S. Pat. No. 2610460. United Technologies Corporation opposed by Safran Aircraft Engines. Mailed Oct. 17, 2016. |
Decision. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2017-00425. U.S. Pat. No. 8,448,895 B2. Entered Jul. 3, 2017. pp. 1-29. |
Final Written Decision. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2016-00531. U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605 B2. Entered Jun. 26, 2017. pp. 1-35. |
Final Written Decision. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2016-00533. U.S. Pat. No. 8,511,605 B2. Entered Jun. 26, 2017. pp. 1-19. |
Kurzke, J. (2008). Preliminary Design, Aero-engine design: From state of the art turbofans towards innovative architectures. pp. 1-72. |
Zamboni, G. and Xu, L. (2009). Fan root aerodynamics for large bypass gas turbine engines: Influence on the engine performance and 3D design. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea and Air. Jun. 8-12, 2009, Orlando, Florida, USA. pp. 1-12. |
Han, J., Dutta, S., and Ekkad, S.V. (2000). Gas turbine heat transfer and cooling technology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-25, 129-157, and 160-249. |
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 1-18, 60-62, 85-87, 95-104, 121-123, 223-234, 242-245, 278-280, 303-309, 323-326, 462-479, 517-520, 563-565, 673-675, 682-685, 697-699, 703-705, 802-805, 862-864, and 923-925. |
Declaration of Reza Abhari, Ph.D. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,844,265. Executed Jun. 28, 2016. pp. 1-91. |
Declaration of John Eaton, Ph.D. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,869,568. Executed Mar. 28, 2016. pp. 1-87. |
Declaration of Dr. Magdy Attia. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,517,668. Executed Dec. 8, 2016. pp. 1-81. |
Cramoisi, G. Ed. (2012). Death in the Potomac: The crash of Air Florida Flight 90. Air Crash Investigations. Accident Report NTSB/AAR-82-8. p. 45-47. |
Norton, M. and Karczub, D. (2003). Fundamentals of noise and vibration analysis for engineers. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. New York: New York. p. 524. |
U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular. Runway overrun prevention. Dated: Nov. 6, 2007. p. 1-8 and Appendix 1 p. 1-15, Appendix 2 p. 1-6, Appendix 3 p. 1-3, and Appendix 4 p. 1-5. |
U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular. Standard operating procedures for flight deck crewmembers. Dated: Feb. 27, 2003.. p. 1-6 and Appendices. |
Vasudevan, A.K. and Petrovic, J.J. (1992). A comparative overview of molybedenum disilicide composites. Materials Science and Engineering, A155, 1992. pp. 1-17. |
Clarke, D.R. and Levi, C.G. (2003). Materials design for the next generation thermal barrier coatings. Annual. Rev. Mater. Res. vol. 33. 2003. pp. 383-417. |
Lee, K.N. (2000). Current status of environmental barrier coatings for Si-Based ceramics. Surface and Coatings Technology 133-134, 2000. pp. 1-7. |
Bornstein, N. (1993). Oxidation of advanced intermetallic compounds. Journal de Physique IV, 1993, 03 (C9), pp. C9-367-C9-373. |
Krenkel, W., Naslain, R., and Schneider, H. Eds. (2001). High temperature ceramic matrix composites pp. 224-229. Weinheim, DE: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH. |
Gibala, R., Ghosh, A.K., Van Aken, D.C., Srolovitz, D.J., Basu, A., Chang, H., . . . Yang, W. (1992). Mechanical behavior and interface design of MoSi2-based alloys and composites. Materials Science and Engineering, A155, 1992. pp. 147-158. |
“Shah, D.M. (1992). MoSi2 and other silicides as high temperature structural materials. Superalloys 1992. The Minerals, Metals, & Materials Society. pp. 409-422.” |
Zhao, J.C. and Westbrook, J.H. (2003). Ultrahigh-temperature materials for jet engines. MRS Bulletin. vol. 28(9). Sep. 2003. pp. 622-630. |
Tsirlin, M., Pronin, Y.E., Florina, E.K., Mukhametov, S. Kh., Khatsernov, M.A., Yun, H.M., . . . Kroke, E. (2001). Experimental investigation of multifunctional interphase coatings on SiC fibers for non-oxide high temperature resistant CMGs. High Temperature Ceramic Matrix Composites. 4th Int'l Conf. on High Temp. Ceramic Matrix Composites. Oct. 1-3, 2001. pp. 149-156. |
Jacobson, N.S. (1993). Corrosion of silicon-based ceramics in combustion environments. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(1). pp. 3-28. |
Jorgensen, P.J., Wadsworth, M.E., and Cutler, I.B. (1961). Effects of water vapor on oxidation of silicon carbide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44(6). pp. 248-261. |
Xu, Y., Cheng, L., Zhang, L., Ying, H., and Zhou, W. (1999). Oxidation behavior and mechanical properties of C/SiC composites with Si-MoSi2 oxidation protection coating. J. of Mat. Sci. vol. 34. 1999. pp. 6009-6014. |
Sundaram, S.K., Hsu, J-Y., Speyer, R.F. (1995). Molten glass corrosion resistance of immersed combustion-heating tube materials in e-glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78(7). pp. 1940-1946. |
Jeng, Y.-L., Lavernia, E.J. (1994). Processing of molybdenum disilicide. J. of Mat. Sci. vol. 29. 1994. pp. 2557-2571. |
Suzuki, Y., Morgan, P.E.D., and Niihara, K. (1998). Improvement in mechanical properties of powder-processed MoSi2 by the addition of Sc2O3 and Y2O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soci. 81(12). pp. 3141-3149. |
Webster, J.D., Westwood, M.E., Hayes, F.H., Day, R.J., Taylor, R., Duran, A., . . . Vogel, W.D. (1998). Oxidation protection coatings for C/SiC based on yttrium silicate. Journal of European Ceramic Society vol. 18. 1998. pp. 2345-2350. |
Petrovic, J.J., Castro, R.G., Vaidya, R.U., Peters, M.I., Mendoza, D., Hoover, R.C., and Gallegos, D.E. (2001). Molybdenum disilicide materials for glass melting sensor sheaths. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. vol. 22(3). 2001. pp. 59-64. |
Kahn, H., Tayebi, N., Ballarini, R., Mullen, R.L., Heuer, A.H. (2000). Fracture toughness of polysilicon MEMS devices. Sensors and Actuators vol. 82. 2000. pp. 274-280. |
Muhlstein, C.L., Stach, E.A., and Ritchie, R.O. (2002). A reaction-layer mechanism for the delayed failure of micron-scale polycrystalline silicon structural films subjected to high-cycle fatigue loading. Acta Materialia vol. 50. 2002. pp. 3579-3595. |
Sundaram, S.K., Hsu, J-Y., Speyer, R.F. (1994). Molten glass corrosion resistance of immersed combustion-heating tube materials in soda-lime-silicate glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77(6). pp. 1613-1623. |
Leckie, F.A. and Dal Bello, D.J. (2009). Strength and stiffness of engineering systems. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer. pp. 1-3. |
El-Sayad, A.F. (2008). Aircraft propulsion and gas turbine engines. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 215-219 and 855-860. |
Bunker, R.S. (2005). A review of shaped hole turbine film-cooling technology. Journal of Heat Transfer vol. 127. Apr. 2005. pp. 441-453. |
Davies, D. and Miller, D.C. (1971). A variable pitch fan for an ultra quiet demonstrator engine. 1976 Spring Convention: Seeds for Success in Civil Aircraft Design in the Next Two Decades. pp. 1-18. |
Middleton, P. (1971). 614: VFW's jet feederliner. Flight International, Nov. 4, 1971. p. 725, 729-732. |
Schaefer, J.W., Sagerser, D.R., and Stakolich, E.G. (1977). Dynamics of high-bypass-engine thrust reversal using a variable-pitch fan. Technical Report prepare for NASA. NASA-TM-X-3524. May 1, 1977. pp. 1-33. |
Savelle, S.A. and Garrard, G.D. (1996). Application of transient and dynamic simulations to the U.S. Army T55-L-712 helicopter engine. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Presented Jun. 10-13, 1996. pp. 1-8. |
Drago, R.J. and Margasahayam, R.N. (1987). Stress analysis of planet gears with integral bearings; 3D finite-element model development and test validation. 1987 MSC NASTRAN World Users Conference. Los Angeles, CA. Mar. 1987. pp. 1-14. |
Baker, R.W. (2000). Membrane technology and applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill pp. 87-153. |
Cheryan, M. (1998). Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook. Lancaster, PA: Tecnomic Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 171-236. |
Seader, J.D. and Henley, E.J. (1998). Separation process principles. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 722-726 and 764-771. |
Spadaccini, L.J., and Huang, H. (2002). On-line fuel deoxygenation for coke suppression. ASME, Jun. 2002. pp. 1-7. |
Darrah, S. (1987). Jet fuel deoxygenation. Interim Report for Period Mar. 1987-Jul. 1988. pp. 1-22. |
Bucknell, R.L. (1973). Influence of fuels and lubricants on turbine engine design and performance, fuel and lubircant analyses. Final Technical Report, Mar. 1971-Mar. 1973. pp. 1-252. |
Hazlett, R.N. (1991). Thermal oxidation stability of aviation turbine fuels. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM. pp. 1-163. |
Taylor, W.F. (1974). Deposit formation from deoxygenated hydrocarbons. I. General features. Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Develop., vol. 13(2). 1974. pp. 133-138. |
Taylor, W.F. (1974). Deposit formation from deoxygenated hydrocarbons. II. Effect of trace sulfur compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dev., vol. 15(1). 1974. pp. 64-68. |
Taylor, W.F. and Frankenfeld, J.W. (1978). Deposit fromation from deoxygenated hydrocarbons. 3. Effects of trace nitrogen and oxygen compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dev., vol. 17(1). 1978. pp. 86-90. |
Frankenfeld, J.W. and Taylor, W.F. (1980). Deposit fromation from deoxygenated hydrocarbons. 4. Studies in pure compound systems. Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dev., vol. 19(1). 1978. pp. 65-70. |
Hemighaus, G., Boval, T., Bacha, J., Barnes, F., Franklin, M., Gibbs, L., . . . Morris, J. (2007). Aviation fuels: Techincal review. Chevron Products Company. pp. 1-94. Retrieved from: https://www.cgabusinessdesk.com/document/aviation_tech_review.pdf. |
Spadaccini, L.J., Sobel, D.R., and Huang, H. (2001). Deposit formation and mitigation in aircraft fuels. Journal of Eng. For Gas Turbine and Power, vol. 123. Oct. 2001. pp. 741-746. |
Edwards, T. and Zabarnick, S. (1993). Supercritical fuel deposition mechanisms. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. vol. 32. 1993. pp. 3117-3122. |
Huang, H., Sobel, D.R., and Spadaccini, L.J. (2002). Endothermic heat-sink of hydrocarbon fuels for scramjet cooling. AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, Jul. 2002. pp. 1-7. |
Bessarabov, D.G., Jacobs, E.P., Sanderson, R.D., and Beckman, I.N. (1996). Use of nonporous polymeric flat-sheet gas-separation membranes in a membrane-liquid contactor: experimental studies. Journal of Membrane Sciences, vol. 113. 1996. pp. 275-284. |
Matsumoto, T., Toshiro, U., Kishida, A., Tsutomu, F., Maruyama, I., and Akashi, M. (1996). Novel functional polymers: Poly (dimethylsiloxane)-polyamide multiblock copolymer. VII. Oxygen permeability of aramid-silicone membranes in a gas-membrane-liquid system. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 64(6). May 9, 1997. pp. 1153-1159. |
Technical Data. Teflon. WS Hampshire Inc. Retrieved from: http://catalog.wshampshire.com/Asset/psg_teflon_ptfe.pdf. |
Anderson, N.E., Loewenthal, S.H., and Black, J.D. (1984). An analytical method to predict efficiency of aircraft gearboxes. NASA Technical Memorandum prepared for the Twentieth Joint Propulsion Conference. Cincinnati, OH. Jun. 11-13, 1984. pp. 1-25. |
Edkins, D.P., Hirschkron, R., and Lee, R. (1972). TF34 turbofan quiet engine study. Final Report prepared for NASA. NASA-CR-120914. Jan. 1, 1972. pp. 1-99. |
Meyer, A.G. (1988). Transmission development of TEXTRON Lycoming's geared fan engine. Technical Paper. Oct. 1988. pp. 1-12. |
Dudley, D.W., Ed. (1962). Gear handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 14-17 (TOC, Preface, and Index). |
Hughes, C. (2002). Aerodynamic performance of scale-model turbofan outlet guide vanes designed for low noise. Prepared for the 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV. NASA/TM-2001-211352. Jan. 14-17, 2002. pp. 1-38. |
Kaplan, B., Nicke, E., Voss, C. (2006), Design of a highly efficient low-noise fan for ultra-high bypass engines. Proceedings of GT2006 for ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea and Air. Barcelona, SP. May 8-11, 2006. pp. 1-10. |
Gates, D. Bombardier flies at higher market. Seattle Times. |
Decker, S. and Clough, R. (2016). GE wins shot at voiding pratt patent in jet-engine clash. Bloomberg Technology. Retrieved from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-30/ge-wins-shot-to-invalidate-pratt-airplane-engine-patent-in-u-s. |
Trembley, Jr., H.F. (1977). Determination of effects of ambient conditions on aircraft engine emissions. ALF 502 combustor rig testing and engine verification test. Prepared for Environmental Protection Agency. Sep. 1977. pp. 1-256. |
Lewicki, D.G., Black, J.D., Savage, M., and Coy, J.J. (1985). Fatigue life analysis of a turboprop reduction gearbox. NASA Technical Memorandum. Prepared for the Design Technical Conference (ASME). Sep. 11-13, 1985. pp. 1-26. |
McCune, M.E. (1993). Initial test results of 40,000 horsepower fan drive gear system for advanced ducted propulsion systems. AIAA 29th Joint Conference and Exhibit. Jun. 28-30, 1993. pp. 1-10. |
Wright, G.H. and Russell, J.G. (1990). The M.455D-02 variable pitch geared fan engine demonstrator test and evaluation experience. Aeronautical Journal., vol. 84(836). Sep. 1980. pp. 268-277. |
Drago, R.J. (1974). Heavy-lift helicopter brings up drive ideas. Power Transmission Design. Mar. 1987. pp. 1-15. |
Krantz, T.L. (1990). Experimental and analytical evaluation of efficiency of helicopter planetary stage. NASA Technical Paper. Nov. 1990. pp. 1-19. |
Heingartner, P., MBA, D., Brown, D. (2003). Determining power losses in the helical gear mesh; Case Study. ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Chicago, IL. Sep. 2-6, 2003. pp. 1-7. |
Decision. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2017-00431. U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920 B2. Entered Jun. 26, 2017 pp. 1-20. |
Decision. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2017-00428. U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920 B2. Entered Jun. 26, 2017 pp. 1-21. |
Munt, R. (1981). Aircraft technology assessment: Progress in low emissions engine. Technical Report. May 1981. pp. 1-171. |
Judgement and Final Written Decision. U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. IPR2017-00428. Entered Dec. 19. |
Final Written Decision. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. IPR2017-00428. U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920. Entered Jun. 22, 2018. pp. 1-40. |
Patent Owner's Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. IPR2017-00428. Filed Sep. 8, 2017. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2017-00428. U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920. Entered Apr. 10, 2017. pp. 1-36. |
Krauskopf, L. and Shumaker, L. (2014). GE exec says avoided geared design in jet engine battle with Pratt. Rueters. Sep. 14, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-general-electric-united-tech-engine-idUSKBN0HA2H620140915. |
Flying's new gear. (Jan. 2, 2016). The Economist. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2015/12/30/flyings-new-gear. |
Tsang, D. (2011). Special report: The engine battle heats up (update 1). Aspire Aviation. May 10, 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.aspireaviation.com/2011/05/10/pw-purepower-engine-vs-cfm-leap-x. |
United Technologies: Rethinking jet engines to make commercial aviation less of a threat to the climate (and the human respiratory system). Fortune. Retrieved Sep. 29, 2016 from: http://beta.fortune.com/change-the-world/united-technologies-8. |
Pratt & Whitney JT3D/TF33. www.All-Aero.com. Retrieved Apr. 9, 2017 from http://all-aero.com/index.php/contactus/64-engines-power/13428-pratt-whitney-jt3d-tf33. |
Turbofan engine JT8D cutaway model AE-06. AeroTrain Corp. Retrieved Apr. 9, 2017 from: http://aerotraincorp.com/ae-06.php. |
JT15D. Pratt & Whitney Canada Retrieved Apr. 9, 2017 from: http://www.pwc.ca/en/engines/jt15d. |
Rolls-Royce RB211022 turbofan engine, cutaway. National Air and Space Museum. Retrieved Apr. 9, 2017 from: https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/rolls-royce-rb211-22-turbofan-engine-cutaway. |
Yazzie, C. (2013). CFM-56 turbofan jet engines. Retrieved Apr. 9, 2017 from: https://prezi.com/lqwqiuchmgd0/cfm-56-turbofan-jet-engines. |
CFM56 engine. Delta TechOps. Retrieved Apr. 9, 2017 from: http://www.deltatechops.com/mro-capabilites/view/category/cfm56. |
U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration Type Certificate Data Sheet No. E46NE Dated: Jan. 23, 2012. p. 1-7. |
Judgement and Final Written Decision. U.S. Pat. No. 8,448,895. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. IPR2017-00425. Entered Jul. 2, 2018. |
Disclaimer in Patent Under 37 CFR 1.321(a) for U.S. Pat. No. 8,695,920. |
Gray, D.E. and Gardner, W.B. (1983). Energy efficient engine program technology benefit/cost study—vol. 2. NASA CR-174766. Oct. 1983. pp. 1-118. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170058830 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14755221 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15173288 | US | |
Parent | 14190429 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14755221 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13340988 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14190429 | US | |
Parent | 12131876 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 13340988 | US |