The present invention relates to a gas turbine engine, and more particularly to a turbofan engine having a variable area fan nozzle (VAFN) with an acoustic system to attenuate leading edge noise and reduce the total effective perceived noise level (EPNL).
Gas turbine engines which have an engine cycle modulated with a variable area fan nozzle (VAFN) provide a smaller fan exit nozzle diameter during cruise conditions and a larger fan exit nozzle diameter during take-off and landing conditions.
The VAFN may generate significant noise as upstream turbulence interacts with the leading edge of the VAFN. The upstream turbulence may result from turbulent boundary layers which expand from the upstream fixed nacelle wall, turbulence which evolves from the upstream fan exit guide vane (FEGV) wakes or endwall effects, and flow separation that may occur from the contour of the upstream nacelle wall. The physical mechanism for leading edge VAFN noise, which exhibits acoustic dipole behavior, is fundamentally different from traditional jet exhaust mixing noise, which exhibits acoustic quadrupole behavior. Additionally, this excess noise is not significantly reduced in forward flight as typical jet exhaust mixing noise. Thus, the leading edge source is of significant importance in its contribution toward the effective perceived noise level (EPNL).
In one exemplary embodiment, a nacelle assembly for a high-bypass gas turbine engine includes a core nacelle defined about an engine centerline axis. A fan nacelle is mounted at least partially around the core nacelle to define a fan bypass flow path. A variable area fan nozzle is in communication with the fan bypass flow path. The variable area fan nozzle has a first fan nacelle section and a second fan nacelle section. The second fan nacelle section is axially movable relative to the first fan nacelle section to define an auxiliary port at a non-closed position to vary a fan nozzle exit area and adjust fan bypass airflow. The second fan nacelle section includes an acoustic system that has an acoustic impedance located on a radially outer surface.
In a further embodiment of the above, the acoustic system is defined at least in part within a leading edge region of the second fan nacelle section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system further comprises a forward acoustic system and an aft acoustic system. The forward acoustic system is different than the aft acoustic system.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system further comprises a forward acoustic system and an aft acoustic system. The forward acoustic system comprises the leading edge of the second fan nacelle section. The aft acoustic system comprises at least a portion of an upper surface of the second fan nacelle section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system includes a perforated inner face sheet and a perforated outer face sheet supported by a structure.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system comprises a perforated inner face sheet.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system comprises an outer face sheet.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system comprises a bulk absorbing material.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system comprises a forward acoustic system that is in fluid communication with an aft acoustic system. The forward acoustic system comprises a bulk absorbing material and said aft acoustic system comprises a perforated outer face sheet along at least a portion of an upper surface of said second fan nacelle section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second fan nacelle section defines a trailing edge of the variable area fan nozzle.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second fan nacelle section is subdivided into a multiple of independently operable sectors. Each of the multiple of independently operable sectors is axially movable relative to the first fan nacelle section to define an asymmetric fan nozzle exit area.
In another exemplary embodiment, a high-bypass gas turbine engine includes a core engine defined about an axis. A gear system is driven by the core engine. A turbofan is driven by the gear system about the axis. A core nacelle is defined at least partially about the core engine. A fan nacelle is mounted at least partially around the core nacelle to define a fan bypass flow path. A variable area fan nozzle is in communication with the fan bypass flow path. The variable area fan nozzle has a first fan nacelle section and a second fan nacelle section. The second fan nacelle section is axially movable relative to the first fan nacelle section to define an auxiliary port at a non-closed position to vary a fan nozzle exit area and adjust fan bypass airflow. The second fan nacelle section includes an acoustic system that is located on a leading edge and radially outer surface.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system comprises a perforated inner face sheet and a perforated outer face sheet that is supported by a structure.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the acoustic system comprises a bulk absorbing material.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the second fan nacelle section defines a trailing edge of the variable area fan nozzle.
In another exemplary embodiment, a method of reducing a total effective perceived noise level of a gas turbine engine with a variable area fan nozzle. The method includes axially moving a second fan nacelle section between a closed position in which the second fan nacelle section is in sequential alignment with a first fan nacelle section in response to a cruise flight condition and an open position in which the second fan nacelle section is aftward of the first fan nacelle section to define an auxiliary port. The second fan nacelle section has a leading edge region with an acoustic system which provides an acoustic impedance when the second fan nacelle section is positioned at a non-closed position.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the method includes generating the acoustic impedance with at least a portion of an upper surface of the second fan nacelle section.
In a further embodiment of any of the above, the open position is in which the second fan nacelle section is aftward of the first fan nacelle section to define an auxiliary port is in response to a non-cruise flight condition.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
The turbofan engine 10 includes a core engine within a core nacelle 12 that houses a low spool 14 and high spool 24. The low spool 14 includes a low pressure compressor 16 and low pressure turbine 18. The low spool 14 also drives a fan section 20 through a gear train 22. The high spool 24 includes a high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. A combustor 30 is arranged between the high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. The low and high spools 14, 24 rotate about an engine axis of rotation A.
The engine 10 in one non-limiting embodiment is a high-bypass geared architecture aircraft engine with a bypass ratio greater than ten (10:1), a turbofan diameter significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 16, and the low pressure turbine 18 with a pressure ratio greater than 5:1. The gear train 22 may be an epicycle gear train such as a planetary gear system or other gear system with a gear reduction ratio of greater than 2.5:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one non-limiting embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that this disclosure is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.
Airflow enters a fan nacelle 34, which at least partially surrounds the core nacelle 12. The fan section 20 communicates airflow into the core nacelle 12 to power the low pressure compressor 16 and the high pressure compressor 26. Core airflow compressed by the low pressure compressor 16 and the high pressure compressor 26 is mixed with the fuel in the combustor 30 and expanded over the high pressure turbine 28 and low pressure turbine 18. The turbines 28, 18 are coupled for rotation with, respective, spools 24, 14 to rotationally drive the compressors 26, 16 and through the gear train 22, the fan section 20 in response to the expansion. A core engine exhaust E exits the core nacelle 12 through a core nozzle 43 defined between the core nacelle 12 and a tail cone 32.
The core nacelle 12 is supported within the fan nacelle 34 by circumferentially space structures 36 often generically referred to as Fan Exit Guide Vanes (FEGVs). A bypass flow path 40 is defined between the core nacelle 12 and the fan nacelle 34. The engine 10 generates a high bypass flow arrangement with a bypass ratio in which approximately eighty percent of the airflow which enters the fan nacelle 34 becomes bypass flow B. The bypass flow B communicates through the generally annular bypass flow path 40 and is discharged from the engine 10 through a variable area fan nozzle (VAFN) 42 which defines a nozzle exit area 44 between the fan nacelle 34 and the core nacelle 12 at a fan nacelle end segment 34S of the fan nacelle 34 downstream of the fan section 20.
Thrust is a function of density, velocity, and area. One or more of these parameters can be manipulated to vary the amount and direction of thrust provided by the bypass flow B. The VAFN 42 operates to effectively vary the area of the fan nozzle exit area 44 to selectively adjust the pressure ratio of the bypass flow B in response to a controller C. Low pressure ratio turbofans are desirable for their high propulsive efficiency. However, low pressure ratio fans may be inherently susceptible to fan stability/flutter problems at low power and low flight speeds. The VAFN allows the engine to change to a more favorable fan operating line at low power, avoiding the instability region, and still provide the relatively smaller nozzle area necessary to obtain a high-efficiency fan operating line at cruise.
A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 20 of the engine 10 is preferably designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at 0.8M and 35,000 feet. As the fan blades within the fan section 20 are efficiently designed at a particular fixed stagger angle for an efficient cruise condition, the VAFN 42 is operated to effectively vary the fan nozzle exit area 44 to adjust fan bypass air flow such that the angle of attack or incidence on the fan blades is maintained close to the design incidence for efficient engine operation at other flight conditions, such as landing and takeoff to thus provide optimized engine operation over a range of flight conditions with respect to performance and other operational parameters such as noise levels.
The VAFN 42 may be separated into at least two sectors 42A-42B (
The VAFN 42 generally includes an auxiliary port system 50 having a first fan nacelle section 52 and a second fan nacelle section 54 movably mounted relative the first fan nacelle section 52. The second fan nacelle section 54 axially slides along the engine axis A relative the fixed first fan nacelle section 52 to change the effective area of the fan nozzle exit area 44. The second fan nacelle section 54, in one non-limiting embodiment, slides aftward upon a track fairing 56A, 56B (illustrated schematically in
The VAFN 42 changes the physical area and geometry of the bypass flow path 40 during particular flight conditions. The bypass flow B is effectively altered by sliding of the second fan nacelle section 54 relative the first fan nacelle section 52 between a closed position (
The VAFN 42 is opened by moving the second fan nacelle section 54 aftward along the track fairing 56A, 56B away from the first fan nacelle section 52 to open an auxiliary port 60 (
In one non-limiting embodiment, the auxiliary port 60 is incorporated within the bypass flow path 40 aft of the Fan Exit Guide Vanes 36 (FEGVs). The auxiliary port 60 is located through the bypass duct outer wall.
In operation, the VAFN 42 communicates with the controller C to move the second fan nacelle section 54 relative the first fan nacelle section 52 of the auxiliary port system 50 to effectively vary the area defined by the fan nozzle exit area 44. Various control systems including an engine controller or an aircraft flight control system may also be usable with the present invention. By adjusting the axial position of the entire periphery of the second fan nacelle section 54 in which all sectors are moved simultaneously, engine thrust and fuel economy are maximized during each flight regime by varying the fan nozzle exit area. By separately adjusting the sectors of the second fan nacelle section 54 to provide an asymmetrical fan nozzle exit area 44, engine bypass flow is selectively vectored to provide, for example only, trim balance, thrust controlled maneuvering, enhanced ground operations and short field performance.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In this non-limiting embodiment, the aft acoustic system 92 is located only along an outer surface 54A of the second fan nacelle section 54. The aft acoustic system 92 may alternatively or additionally include a perforated plate design bounded to partitions in the internal volume or a wire mesh acoustic liner, if a relatively larger attenuation bandwidth is desired.
Noise reduction on the order of approximately 3 EPNdB cumulative over the certification conditions described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 36 may be readily achieved by the acoustic system 64 disclosed herein and include both tone and broadband reductions.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The preferred embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
This disclosure is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/147,432 filed Jun. 26, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2340417 | Ellett | Feb 1944 | A |
3287906 | McCormick | Nov 1966 | A |
3316714 | Smith et al. | May 1967 | A |
3754484 | Roberts | Aug 1973 | A |
3820628 | Hanson | Jun 1974 | A |
3820719 | Clark | Jun 1974 | A |
3892358 | Gisslen | Jul 1975 | A |
4130175 | Hehmann | Dec 1978 | A |
4130872 | Harloff | Dec 1978 | A |
4475624 | Bourland et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4522283 | Smith | Jun 1985 | A |
5169288 | Gliebe et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5272869 | Dawson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5433674 | Sheridan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447411 | Curley et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5524847 | Brodell et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5594216 | Yasukawa et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613649 | Schlinker et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5778659 | Duesler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5806302 | Cariola et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857836 | Stickler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915917 | Eveker et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5975841 | Lindemuth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004095 | Waitz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6139259 | Ho et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6223616 | Sheridan | May 2001 | B1 |
6318070 | Rey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6439840 | Tse | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6688107 | Ono et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6789998 | Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814541 | Evans et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6905303 | Liu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7018172 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021042 | Law | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7118331 | Shahpar | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7334998 | Jones et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7591754 | Duong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7824305 | Duong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7926260 | Sheridan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8205432 | Sheridan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20060130456 | Suciu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20100148396 | Xie et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100331139 | McCune | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1516041 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2026622 | Feb 1980 | GB |
2041090 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2007038674 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008045049 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report, mailed Oct. 30, 2009. |
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012. |
“Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications”, Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005). |
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8). Start p. 32. |
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710. pp. 1-13. |
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883. pp. 1-27. |
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104. |
McMillian, A. (2008) Material development for fan blade containment casing. Abstract. p. 1. Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006. |
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida. pp. 145-153. |
Agarwal, B.D and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York. pp. 1-30, 50-51, 56-58, 60-61, 64-71, 87-89, 324-329, 436-437. |
Carney, K., Pereira, M. Revilock, and Matheny, P. (2003). Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference. pp. 1-10. |
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers,108(8), 65-67. |
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998. |
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.C., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in NASA's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007. |
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modem Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case pp. 1-4. |
Hall, C.A. and Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, 479-487. |
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37 (20), 1821-1837. |
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 1-24. |
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. p. 11. |
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233. pp. 1-31. |
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987. pp. 1-23. |
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189. |
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 465. |
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978. pp. 39-43. |
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995. pp. 3-9. |
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. pp. 341-344. |
Lau K., Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436. |
Shorter Oxford English dictionary, 6th Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888. |
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 145, 355-358. |
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25. |
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 8-15. |
Pyrograf-III Carbon Nanofiber. Product guide. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2015 from: http://pyrografproducts.com/Merchant5/merchant.mvc?Screen=cp—nanofiber |
Nanocor Technical Data for Epoxy Nanocomposites using Nanomer 1.30E Nanoclay. Nnacor, Inc. Oct. 2004. |
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers. pp. 187-216. |
Wendus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport. NASA/CR-2003-212467. pp. 1-37. |
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M., The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994.pp. 1-7. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824. |
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126. |
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982. |
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010. pp. 1-8. |
Moxon, J. How to save fuel in tomorrow's engines. Flight International. Jul. 30, 1983. 3873(124). pp. 272-273. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876. |
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. pp. 1-9. |
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 12-15, 1983. pp. 1-12. |
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972. pp. 1-12. |
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. pp. 510-512. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012. |
Ivchenko-Progress AI-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011. |
Ivchenko-Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007. |
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009. |
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010. |
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010. |
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150135678 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12147432 | Jun 2008 | US |
Child | 14609800 | US |