The present invention relates to a gas-turbine lean combustor. In detail, the present invention relates to a fuel nozzle of controlled fuel inhomogeneity, which offers the possibility of introducing fuel in a way that is optimal for combustion.
Different concepts for fuel nozzles are known for reducing thermally generated nitrogen oxide emissions. One possibility uses operating combustors with a high air/fuel excess. Here, use is made of the principle that due to a lean mixture, and while ensuring an adequate spatial homogeneity of the fuel/air mixture at the same time, a reduction of the combustion temperatures and thus of the thermally generated nitrogen oxides is made possible. Moreover, in many combustors of such type, a so-called internal fuel staging system is employed. This means that, apart from a main fuel injection designed for low NOx emissions, a so-called pilot stage is integrated into the combustor, the pilot stage being operated with an increased fuel/air amount and designed to ensure combustion stability, adequate combustion chamber burn-out and appropriate ignition characteristics (see
A further feature of known combustors is the presence of so-called stabilizer elements that are used for stabilizing flames in the combustion chambers (see
The local fuel/air mixture is not adjustable in a controlled manner for the known combustor concepts. Especially in the case of the already mentioned film applicator concepts, the problem arises that although with a desired homogeneous axial and circumferential loading of the fuel on the film applicator an excellent air/fuel mixture can be achieved at combustion temperatures that are low on average, and thus low NOx emissions, the homogeneous mixture formation desired for high-load conditions may lead to a pronounced deterioration of the combustion chamber burn-out under partial load conditions due to an insufficient fuel loading on the film applicator (see
Likewise, drawbacks also arise with respect to flame anchoring by means of the known stabilizers. In general it is possible to set the recirculation magnitude in the wake of the stabilizer through the dimension of the flame holder, for instance the outer diameter and the resistance coefficient of the flow blockage. An application for a flame holder for a low-emission lean combustor is e.g. known from U.S. Pat. No. 6,272,840 B1. A drawback of such an application is however that with the help of the selected geometry of the flame stabilizer, only a specific flow form can be set and the shear layer between the accelerated and the decelerated flow is distinguished by very high turbulence. It is known with respect to such a flame stabilizer with V-shaped geometry that a high lean-extinction stability of the flame can be achieved through the formation of a strong flow acceleration (“jet”) in the wake of a pilot combustor that is centrally arranged on the combustor axis. This is accomplished through a continuous reduction of the flow velocity of the pilot jet further downstream, the implementation of a recirculation in the wake of the flame stabilizer and the return of hot combustion gases upstream close to the stabilizer (see
Furthermore, reference is made to US 2002/0011064 A1 as prior art.
Another form of flow is characterized by a so-called “unfolding” of the flow and the formation of a recirculation region on the combustor axis (see
As can be seen from the described effects, only a specific form of flow can be set with the formerly known flame stabilizer geometries, said form, however, only contributing to the improvement of a few operating parameters, such as lean extinction stability, while a deterioration of other operating parameters, such as soot and NOx emissions, is observed at the same time.
It is the object of the present invention to provide a gas-turbine lean combustor of the aforementioned type which, while being of a simple design and avoiding the drawbacks of the prior art, shows low pollutant emissions, improved flame stability and high combustion chamber burn-out.
The invention shall now be described below with reference to embodiments, taken in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
The present invention provides for a combustor operated with air excess (see
Controlled fuel inhomogeneity through discrete jet injection:
A discrete jet injection via a plurality of fuel bores n for the main stage of a lean combustor is suggested as the preferred method for setting local fuel inhomogeneities. Bores between n=8 and n=40 are preferably provided. The bores may here be distributed evenly or unevenly over the circumference. Furthermore, a single-row and a multi-row arrangement of the bores as well as a staggered arrangement are possible (see
An essential feature of the present invention is that the exit openings of the discrete fuel injections are inclined in circumferential direction (see
Under low to mean load conditions, the described effects lead above all to an improvement of the combustion chamber burn-out due to local fuel enrichment. Under higher load conditions up to full load conditions a larger penetration depth of the jets is accomplished due to an increased fuel pressure and thus also increased fuel velocity of the individual jets. The associated intensification of the jet dispersion leads at a given circumferential inclination of the fuel jets to a further homogenization of the fuel/air mixture in radial direction and in circumferential direction. With this method of a strong inclination of the fuel jets δ1, δ2 it is possible to set lean fuel/air ratios under high-load conditions.
Controlled fuel inhomogeneity through a fuel film with local fuel enrichments:
This can be accomplished with the help of two different methods. The first method includes metering the main fuel through discrete fuel bores upstream of the exit surface of the fuel passage and the direct adjustment of a fuel/air mixture that is inhomogeneous in a circumferentially controlled manner. This can be accomplished by suitably selecting the number, arrangement and inclination of the fuel bores and by ensuring a small interaction of the injected fuel jets with the already described wall element within the fuel stage. Thus, the fuel jets injected into the central flow channel still possess a defined velocity pulse. While the fuel film for known film applicator concepts is almost without any fuel pulse, a penetration depth (though a reduced one) of a more or less continuous or closed fuel film and a fuel input approximated to a fuel film can be adjusted by virtue of the flow guidance, the short running length of the main fuel between the inner surfaces 19 and 38 of the main stage 18 and the position of the bores 41.
For metering the fuel via discrete bores, and upstream of an exit surface of a main fuel line, and for generating a fuel film with defined fuel streaks, additional wall elements are provided downstream of the film gap, e.g. turbulators/turbulators, lamellar geometries, etc., which generate fuel inhomogeneities in circumferential direction.
A “subsequent” local enrichment of the fuel film in circumferential direction is suggested as a further method for setting a circumferentially existing inhomogeneity of the fuel/air mixture in the use of a fuel film (
Furthermore, it is preferably intended according to the invention to provide the arrangement of the turbulators on the surface of the film applicator as follows: upstream or downstream of the film gap, then each time in a single row or several rows, with/without circumferential inclination, but also a circumferentially closed ring geometry of the turbulator (e.g. a surrounding edge/stage).
Methods for increasing the air velocity in the central flow channel:
An essential feature of the suggested invention is also the intensification of the jet disintegration of the discrete individual jets or of the film disintegration of a fuel film that is inhomogeneous in a circumferentially controlled manner, for reducing the mean drop diameter of the generated fuel spray. This is to be accomplished 36 through the injection of the main fuel into flow regions of high flow velocity in the central air channel. The flame stabilizer 24, which is positioned between the pilot stage and the main stage, is provided 26 with an external deflection ring (leg) adapted to the geometry of the main stage. Said deflection ring is inclined relative to the combustor axis at a defined angle, the angle of inclination α ranging from 10° to 50°. A further measure for flow acceleration in the wake of the vanes for the central air channel is the provision of a defined angle of inclination for the inner wall 19 of the main stage 18. Said angle of inclination, based on the non-deflected main flow direction, is within the range between 5°<β<40° (see
Methods for avoiding flow interruption in the outer flow channel and for improving the fuel preparation of the main injection:
A further feature of the present invention is the suitable constructional design of the outer combustor ring 27. The inner contour of the ring geometry 28 is configured such that, in dependence upon the inclination of the outer wall of the main stage 20, the air flow in the outer air channel is not interrupted under any operating conditions (see
Contoured Flame Stabilizer, Fixed Geometry:
To accomplish a decrease in pollutant emissions over a wide load range in addition to an improvement of the combustion chamber burn-out, it seems that the setting of a mixed and/or load-dependent flow shape with defined interaction of the pilot and main flame is advantageous. An excessive separation of the pilot flame and the main flame is to be avoided. It is generally expected that a strong separation of the two zones may lead to an improved operational behavior of the combustor when the pilot stage and main stage, respectively, is preferably operated. This is e.g. the case in the lower load range (only the pilot stage is supplied with fuel) and under high-load operation (a major portion of the fuel is distributed over the lean-operating main stage). However, this may reduce the combustion chamber burn-out over a wide portion of the operational range, particularly in the part-load range (e.g. cruising flight condition, staging point) because a complete burn-out of the fuel is critical for the main stage operating with a high air excess. That is why a controlled interaction of the two combustion zones is desired for accomplishing a temperature increase in the main reaction zone with the help of the hot combustion gases.
According to the invention different geometries are provided for the flame stabilizers 24, which permit the defined setting of a flow field with pronounced properties of central and decentral recirculation. A specific contouring, both in axial and circumferential direction, of the flame stabilizer is generally suggested. One embodiment with a blossom-like geometry for the exit cross-section of a flame stabilizer is shown in
Apart from the variant shown in
A further embodiment is provided by the circumferential orientation of the 3D wave geometry (contourings) of the flame stabilizer on the effective swirl angle of the deflected air flow for the inner pilot stage and/or on the effective swirl angle of the deflected air flow for the radially outwardly arranged main stage.
Apart from the described contouring of the inner leg 25, a further feature of the present invention with respect to the configuration of the flame stabilizer is a contouring of the outer leg of the flame stabilizer 26, where the geometries suggested for the inner leg of the flame stabilizer can also be used for the outer leg 26. See
Contoured Flame Stabilizer, Variable Geometry:
For the controlled setting of a flow field with different backflow zones a variable geometry is suggested in addition to a geometrically fixed geometry of a contoured flame stabilizer. The advantage of a variable geometry is that in dependence upon the load condition a desired flow shape can be set in the combustion chamber and the operative behavior of the combustor can thus be influenced with respect to pollutant reduction, burn-out and flame stability. As a possibility of adapting the flow field with the help of a variable geometry for the flame stabilizer, the integration of piezo elements as intermediate elements or directly on the rear edge of the inner or outer leg of the flame stabilizer is for instance suggested. In the case of these elements the principle of the voltage-dependent field extension is to be exploited. This means that in the original state, i.e. without voltage load of the piezo elements, there is an enlarged exit cross-section of the flame stabilizer. This state corresponds to the presence of an enlarged exit diameter A2, which promotes the formation of a predominantly decentral recirculation zone. When a voltage state is applied, material extension takes place with a radial component in the direction of the combustor axis (see
The implementation of bimetal elements in the geometry of the flame holder is suggested as a further principle of the variable setting of the flow shape through adaptation of the exit geometry of the flame stabilizer. The principle regarding the temperature-dependent material extension is here employed. Bimetal elements can for instance be integrated into the front part of the flame stabilizer or on the rear edge of the flame stabilizer so as to achieve a desired change in the exit geometry.
The essential advantage of the present invention is the controlled setting of the fuel/air mixture for the main stage of a lean-operated combustor. Due to the presence of locally rich mixtures a sufficiently high combustion chamber burn-out can be accomplished particularly under low to average load conditions with the described measures. Moreover, under high-load conditions a circumferentially improved fuel/air mixture can be achieved through the inclination of the fuel jets (particularly circumferentially), resulting in very low NOx emissions in a way similar to an optimized film applicator.
A further advantage of the invention is the possibility of a controlled setting of a “mixed” flow field with pronounced central and decentral recirculation regions. It is expected that the presence of a central recirculation helps to reduce NOx emissions significantly on the one hand and the adjustment of a sufficient backflow zone in the wake of the flame stabilizer helps to achieve a very high flame stability to lean extinction on the other hand. Furthermore, it is expected that the interaction between pilot and main flame can be set in a more controlled way because it is possible in dependence upon the 3D contour of the flame stabilizer to generate different flow states with a more or less strong interaction of the pilot and main flow. With the help of this selective generation of a “mixed” flow shape the operative range of the lean combustor can be significantly extended between low and full load.
A further advantage of the invention is expected with respect to the ignition of the pilot stage. Due to the contoured geometry of the exit surface with locally increased pitch diameters A2, a radial expansion (dispersion) of the pilot spray is generated, which may lead to an improved mixture preparation. This enhances the probability that a major amount of the pilot spray can be guided near the combustion chamber wall into the area of the spark plug, and the ignition properties of the combustor can thus be improved in dependence upon the local fuel/air mixture. A further advantage of the three-dimensional contouring of the flame stabilizer is a homogenization of the flow and thus reduced occurrence of possible flow instabilities, which may often form in the wake of baffle bodies, particularly in the shear layer.
An advantage of a variable adaptation of the exit cross-section of the flame stabilizer and thus in the final analysis the adjustment of the flow velocity resides in the possibility of “automatically” adjusting central or decentral recirculation zones inside the combustion chamber in dependence upon the current operative state. With the help of this method it would be possible to generate a central flow recirculation on the combustor axis within a specific operative range, the recirculation promoting the reduction of NOx emissions particularly in the high-load range due to the “unfolding” of the pilot flow and the corresponding interaction between the pilot flame and the main flame. On the other hand, a high flame stability can be reached in the lower load range by promoting a distinct increase in the flow velocity via a reduction of the exit surface of the flame stabilizer. This permits a defined optimization of the combustor behavior for different operative states.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 043 626 | Sep 2007 | DE | national |
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/232,324 filed Sep. 15, 2008, which claims priority to German Patent Application DE102007043626.4 filed Sep. 13, 2007, and the entirety of both applications are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091283 | Kidwell | May 1963 | A |
3568650 | Albrich | Mar 1971 | A |
3608831 | Place et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3699773 | Schuning | Oct 1972 | A |
3703259 | Sturgess et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3713588 | Sharpe | Jan 1973 | A |
3808803 | Salvi | May 1974 | A |
3866413 | Sturgess | Feb 1975 | A |
3919840 | Markowski | Nov 1975 | A |
3930369 | Verdouw | Jan 1976 | A |
3937011 | Caruel | Feb 1976 | A |
3955361 | Schirmer | May 1976 | A |
3977186 | Arvin et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3980233 | Simmons et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4099505 | Stumpp et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4141213 | Ross | Feb 1979 | A |
4170108 | Mobsby | Oct 1979 | A |
4175380 | Baycura | Nov 1979 | A |
4218020 | Reider | Aug 1980 | A |
4222243 | Mobsby | Sep 1980 | A |
4237694 | Wood et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4425755 | Hughes | Jan 1984 | A |
4445339 | Davis, Jr. et al. | May 1984 | A |
4519958 | Kendig | May 1985 | A |
4845952 | Beebe | Jul 1989 | A |
4854127 | Vinson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4920740 | Shekleton | May 1990 | A |
4974416 | Taylor | Dec 1990 | A |
5154059 | Keller | Oct 1992 | A |
5165241 | Joshi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5251447 | Joshi | Oct 1993 | A |
5303554 | Faulkner | Apr 1994 | A |
5351475 | Ansart | Oct 1994 | A |
5351477 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5373693 | Zarzalis | Dec 1994 | A |
5375995 | Dobbeling et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5479781 | Fric et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5505045 | Lee | Apr 1996 | A |
5511375 | Joshi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515680 | Fujimura et al. | May 1996 | A |
5590529 | Joshi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609030 | Althaus | Mar 1997 | A |
5647215 | Sharifi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673551 | Dobbeling | Oct 1997 | A |
5735117 | Toelle | Apr 1998 | A |
5778676 | Joshi | Jul 1998 | A |
5799872 | Nesbitt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816049 | Joshi | Oct 1998 | A |
5822992 | Dean | Oct 1998 | A |
5881550 | Toelle | Mar 1999 | A |
5916142 | Snyder et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927076 | Pillsbury | Jul 1999 | A |
5937653 | Alary et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5966937 | Graves | Oct 1999 | A |
5983642 | Parker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6045351 | Dobbeling et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067790 | Choi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070411 | Iwai et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094916 | Puri | Aug 2000 | A |
6119459 | Gomez | Sep 2000 | A |
6122916 | Amos et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141967 | Angel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152726 | Ruck | Nov 2000 | A |
6158223 | Mandai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6216466 | Alkabie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238206 | Cummings et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256975 | Dobbeling et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272640 | Sokol | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272840 | Crocker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289676 | Prociw | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289677 | Prociw | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301899 | Dean et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334309 | Dean et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360525 | Senior et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363725 | Mei et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367262 | Mongia et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6418726 | Foust et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6453660 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460345 | Beebe et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474569 | Brundish | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481209 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6532726 | Norster et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536412 | Someno et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543235 | Crocker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6634175 | Kawata et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6655145 | Boardman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675581 | Stuttaford et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675583 | Willis et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688109 | Hein | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691516 | Stuttaford et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705087 | Ohri et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722132 | Stuttaford et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735949 | Haynes et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6799427 | Calvez | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820411 | Pederson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6968255 | Dimaridis et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6986255 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993916 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7047746 | Hellat | May 2006 | B2 |
7065972 | Zupanc et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086234 | Doerr et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7546734 | Dorr et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7547654 | Boisson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7658075 | Von Der Bank | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694521 | Ohta et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7779636 | Buelow et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010023590 | Mandai et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020011064 | Crocker et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014078 | Mandai et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020139121 | Cornwell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162333 | Zelina | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174656 | Hein | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030093997 | Stalder | May 2003 | A1 |
20040003596 | Chin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040040311 | Doerr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055270 | Blomeyer | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055308 | Blomeyer | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040195402 | Joshi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050028526 | Von Der Bank | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039456 | Hayashi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050895 | Dorr et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097889 | Pilatis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115244 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060248898 | Buelow et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070042307 | DeMarcos et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
26 18 219 | Nov 1976 | DE |
38 39 542 | Aug 1989 | DE |
3819898 | Dec 1989 | DE |
3913124 | Dec 1989 | DE |
42 03 775 | Aug 1993 | DE |
4316474 | Nov 1994 | DE |
19533055 | Mar 1996 | DE |
19527453 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19532264 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19535370 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19757189 | Jun 1999 | DE |
697 22 517 | Apr 2004 | DE |
699 11 008 | Apr 2004 | DE |
103 40 826 | Mar 2005 | DE |
699 27 025 | Jun 2006 | DE |
10 2005 062079 | Jul 2007 | DE |
102007015311 | Oct 2007 | DE |
0500256 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0561591 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0724115 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0751345 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0870989 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0994300 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1172610 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1445540 | Aug 2004 | EP |
17 14 081 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1420027 | Jan 1976 | GB |
1537671 | Jan 1979 | GB |
2012415 | Jul 1979 | GB |
9855800 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9906767 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9954610 | Oct 1999 | WO |
02095293 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2005028526 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
German Search Report dated Jan. 15, 2009. |
German Search Report dated May 16, 2008. |
European Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2012 from counterpart application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120174588 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12232324 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13415173 | US |