The present application and the resultant patent relate generally to a turbine nozzle for a gas turbine engine and more particularly relate to a turbine nozzle with a flow groove positioned on a suction side or elsewhere so as to limit radial now migration and turbulence.
In a gas turbine, many system requirements should be met at each stage of the gas turbine so as to meet design goals. These design goals may include, but are not limited to, overall improved efficiency and airfoil loading capability. As such, a turbine nozzle airfoil profile should achieve thermal and mechanical operating requirements for a particular stage. For example, last stage nozzles may have a region of significantly high losses near an outer diameter. These loses may be related to radial flow migration along an inward suction side. Such radial flow migration may combine with mixing losses so as to reduce blade row efficiency. As such, a reduction in radial now migration with an accompanying reduction in the total pressure loss should improve overall performance and efficiency.
There is thus a desire for an improved turbine nozzle design, particularly for a last stage nozzle. Such an improved turbine nozzle design should accommodate and/or eliminate radial flow migration and associated loses about the airfoil. Such a reduction in radial flow migration and the like should improve overall performance and efficiency. Overall cost and maintenance concerns also should be considered and addressed herein.
The present application and the resultant patent provide an example of a turbine nozzle. The turbine nozzle described herein may include an airfoil with a leading edge and a trailing edge and a flow groove extending from the leading edge to the trailing edge.
The present application and the resultant patent further provide an example of a turbine. The turbine described herein may include a number of stages with each of the stages including a number of nozzles and a number of buckets. Each of the buckets may include an airfoil with a leading edge, a trailing edge, and a flow groove extending therebetween.
The present application and the resultant patent further provide an example of a turbine nozzle airfoil. The turbine nozzle airfoil described herein may include a leading edge, a trailing edge, a pressure side, a suction side, and a flow groove extending from the leading edge to the trailing edge along the suction side. Other configurations may be used.
These and other features and improvements of the present application and the resultant patent will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the several drawings and the appended claims.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like elements throughout the several views,
The gas turbine engine 10 may use natural gas, various types of syngas, and/or other types of fuels. The gas turbine engine 10 may be any one of a number of different gas turbine engines offered by General Electric Company of Schenectady, N.Y., including, but not limited to, those such as a 7 or a 9 series heavy duty gas turbine engine and the like. The gas turbine engine 10 may have different configurations and may use other types of components. Other types of gas turbine engines also may be used herein. Multiple gas turbine engines, other types of turbines, and other types of power generation equipment also may be used herein together.
The buckets 130, 160, 190 may be positioned in a circumferential array on a rotor 200 for rotation therewith. Likewise, the nozzles 120, 150, 180 may be stationary and may be mounted in a circumferential array on a casing 210 and the like. A hot gas path 215 may extend therethrough the turbine 100 for driving the buckets 130, 160, 190 with the flow of combustion gases 35 from the combustor 25. Other components and other configurations also may be used herein.
The nozzle 220 may have a flow groove 300 positioned about the airfoil 230. The flow groove 300 may be positioned near the tip 290 of the airfoil 230, i.e., the flow groove 300 may be positioned closer to the tip 290 than the platform 280. The flow groove 300 may extend inwardly from the leading edge 240 to the trailing edge 250 along the suction side 270. The flow groove 300 may smoothly blend into the leading edge 240 and the trailing edge 250. The flow groove 300 may extend in a largely linear direction 320 along the suction side 270 although other directions may be used herein. The flow groove 300 may have a largely V or U-shaped configuration 310 although other configurations may be used herein. Specifically, the flow groove 300 may have any size, shape, or configuration.
More than one flow groove 300 may be used herein. Although the flow groove 300 has been discussed in terms of the suction side 370, a flow groove 300 also may be positioned on the pressure side 260, for example as shown in
The use of the flow groove 300 about the nozzle 220 thus acts to direct the flow of combustion gases 35 in an axial direction so as to reduce the amount of radial flow migration. Reduction in the extent of the radial flow migration may be accompanied by a reduction in total pressure losses so as to improve overall blade row efficiency and performance. The flow groove 300 thus acts as a physical barrier to prevent such flow migration in that the flow groove 300 channels the flow in the desired direction. The use of the flow groove 300 also may be effective in reducing turbulence thereabout.
It should be apparent that the foregoing relates only to certain embodiments of the present application and the resultant patent. Numerous changes and modifications may be made herein by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the general spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims and the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1152426 | McCarroll | Sep 1915 | A |
2041793 | Stalker | May 1936 | A |
2573834 | Davidson | Nov 1951 | A |
2650752 | Hoadley | Sep 1953 | A |
3588005 | Rethorst | Jun 1971 | A |
3973870 | Desai | Aug 1976 | A |
4706910 | Walsh et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4884944 | Tate | Dec 1989 | A |
5151014 | Greenwald et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5332360 | Correia et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337568 | Lee et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5520512 | Walker et al. | May 1996 | A |
5738298 | Ross et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6652220 | Powis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7604461 | Bonnet | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7648334 | Hurst et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20060060722 | Choi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080298973 | Marini | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090324400 | Marini et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100135813 | Marini et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110280712 | Graefe et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
700625 | Dec 1940 | DE |
1371813 | Dec 2003 | EP |
2938871 | May 2010 | FR |
55072602 | May 1980 | JP |
1677346 | Sep 1991 | SU |
9844240 | Oct 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
JP55072602A Translation. FLS, Inc. Washington D.C. Mar. 2014. 6 Pages. |
M.J. Walsh, Title: “Grooves reduce aircraft drag”, NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), Date: Sep. 1, 1980, pp. 1. |
EP Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 19, 2014 issued in connection with corresponding EP Application No. 12198416.5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130170977 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |