Patent Grant
8864457
The present invention relates to a turbine vanes and blades for a gas turbine stage and, more particularly, to third and fourth stage turbine vane and blade airfoil configurations.
In a turbomachine, such as a gas turbine engine, air is pressurized in a compressor then mixed with fuel and burned in a combustor to generate hot combustion gases. The hot combustion gases are expanded within the turbine section where energy is extracted to power the compressor and to produce useful work, such as turning a generator to produce electricity. The hot combustion gas travels through a series of turbine stages. A turbine stage may include a row of stationary vanes followed by a row of rotating turbine blades, where the turbine blades extract energy from the hot combustion gas for powering the compressor, and may additionally provide an output power.
The overall work output from the turbine is distributed into all of the stages. The stationary vanes are provided to accelerate the flow and turn the flow to feed into the downstream rotating blades to generate torque to drive the upstream compressor. The flow turning in each rotating blade creates a reaction force on the blade to produce the torque. The work transformation from the gas flow to the rotor disk is directly related to the engine efficiency, and the distribution of the work split for each stage may be controlled by the vane and blade design for each stage.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a turbine airfoil assembly is provided for installation in a gas turbine engine having a longitudinal axis. The turbine airfoil assembly includes an endwall for defining an inner boundary for an axially extending hot working gas path, and an airfoil extending radially outwardly from the endwall. The airfoil has an outer wall comprising a pressure sidewall and a suction sidewall joined together at chordally spaced apart leading and trailing edges of the airfoil. An airfoil mean line is defined extending chordally and located centrally between the pressure and suction sidewalls. Airfoil inlet and exit angles are defined at the airfoil leading and trailing edges that are substantially in accordance with pairs of inlet angle values, α, and exit angle values, β, set forth in one of Tables 1, 3, 5 and 7. The inlet and exit angle values are generally defined as angles between a line parallel to the longitudinal axis and the airfoil mean line lying in an X-Y plane of an X, Y, Z Cartesian coordinate system in which Z is a dimension perpendicular to the X-Y plane and extends radially relative to the longitudinal axis, and wherein each pair of inlet and exit angle values is defined with respect to a distance from the endwall corresponding to a Z value that is a percentage of the total span of the airfoil from the endwall. A predetermined difference between each pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles is defined by a delta value, Δ, in the Table, and a difference between any pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles varies from the delta values, Δ, in the Table by at most 5%.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, third and fourth stage vane and blade airfoil assemblies are provided in a gas turbine engine having a longitudinal axis. Each airfoil assembly includes an endwall for defining an inner boundary for an axially extending hot working gas path, and an airfoil extending radially outwardly from the endwall. The airfoil has an outer wall comprising a pressure sidewall and a suction sidewall joined together at chordally spaced apart leading and trailing edges of the airfoil. An airfoil mean line is defined extending chordally and located centrally between the pressure and suction sidewalls. Airfoil inlet and exit angles are defined at the airfoil leading and trailing edges that are substantially in accordance with pairs of inlet angle values, α, and exit angle values, β. The inlet and exit angle values are generally defined as angles between a line parallel to the longitudinal axis and the airfoil mean line lying in an X-Y plane of an X, Y, Z Cartesian coordinate system in which Z is a dimension perpendicular to the X-Y plane and extends radially relative to the longitudinal axis. Each pair of inlet and exit angle values is defined with respect to a distance from the endwall corresponding to a Z value that is a percentage of the total span of the airfoil from the endwall, wherein:
wherein a predetermined difference between each pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles is defined by a delta value, Δ, in the Table, and a difference between any pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles varies from the delta values, Δ, in a respective Table by at most 5%.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, a turbine airfoil assembly is provided for installation in a gas turbine engine having a longitudinal axis. The turbine airfoil assembly includes an endwall for defining an inner boundary for an axially extending hot working gas path, and an airfoil extending radially outwardly from the endwall. The airfoil has an outer wall comprising a pressure sidewall and a suction sidewall joined together at chordally spaced apart leading and trailing edges of the airfoil. An airfoil mean line is defined extending chordally and located centrally between the pressure and suction sidewalls. Airfoil exit angles are defined at the airfoil trailing edge that are substantially in accordance with exit angle values, β, set forth in one of Tables 1, 3, 5 and 7, where the exit angle values are generally defined as angles between a line parallel to the longitudinal axis and the airfoil mean line lying in an X-Y plane of an X, Y, Z Cartesian coordinate system in which Z is a dimension perpendicular to the X-Y plane and extends radially relative to the longitudinal axis. Each exit angle value is defined with respect to a distance from the endwall corresponding to a Z value that is a percentage of the total span of the airfoil from the endwall, and wherein each airfoil exit angle is within about 1% of a respective value set forth in the Table.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the present invention, it is believed that the present invention will be better understood from the following description in conjunction with the accompanying Drawing Figures, in which like reference numerals identify like elements, and wherein:
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, and not by way of limitation, a specific preferred embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Referring to
During operation of the gas turbine engine, a compressor (not shown) of the engine supplies compressed air to a combustor (not shown) where the air is mixed with a fuel, and the mixture is ignited creating combustion products comprising a hot working gas defining a working fluid. The working fluid travels through the stages of the turbine section 12 where it expands and causes the blades 16, 20, 24, 28 to rotate. The overall work output from the turbine section 12 is distributed into all of the stages, where the stationary vanes 14, 18, 22, 26 are provided for accelerating the gas flow and turn the gas flow to feed into the respective downstream blades 16, 20, 24, 28 to generate torque on a rotor 30 supporting the blades 16, 20, 24, 28, producing a rotational output about a longitudinal axis 32 of the engine, such as to drive the upstream compressor.
The flow turning occurring at each rotating blade 16, 20, 24, 28 creates a reaction force on the blade 16, 20, 24, 28 to produce the output torque. The work split between the stages may be controlled by the angular changes in flow direction effected by each of the vanes 14, 18, 22, 26 and respective blades 16, 20, 24, 28, which work split has an effect on the efficiency of the engine. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a design for the third and fourth stage vanes 22, 26 and blades 24, 28 is provided to optimize or improve the flow angle changes through the third and fourth stages. Specifically, the design of the third and fourth stage vanes 22, 26 and blades 24, 28, as described below, provide a radial variation in inlet and exit flow angles to produce optimized flow profiles into an exhaust diffuser 34 downstream from the turbine section 12. Optimized flow profiles through the third and fourth stages of the turbine section 12 may facilitate a reduction in the average Mach number for flows exiting the fourth stage vanes 26, with an associated improvement in engine efficiency, since flow loss tends to be proportional to the square of the Mach number.
Referring to
The cross section of
At the trailing edge 48, a blade metal angle of the surfaces of the pressure and suction sides 38, 40 adjacent to the trailing edge 48 is provided for directing flow exiting from the vane 22 and defines an airfoil trailing edge (TE) or exit angle, β. The airfoil exit angle, β, is defined as an angle between a line 32P parallel to the longitudinal axis 32 and an extension of the airfoil mean line, CV3, at the trailing edge 48, i.e., tangential to the line CV3 at the airfoil trailing edge 48.
The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, for the airfoil of the vane 22 are as described in Table 1 below. The Z coordinate locations are presented as a percentage of the total span of the vane 22. The values for the inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are defined at selected Z locations spaced at 10% increments along the span of the vane 22, where 0% is located adjacent to the inner endwall 42 and 100% is located adjacent to the outer endwall 44. The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are further graphically illustrated in
Table 1 further describes a predetermined difference between each pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles, at any given span location, as defined by a delta value, Δ, presented as the absolute value of the difference between the leading edge or inlet angle, α, and the trailing edge or exit angle, β. The delta value, Δ, is representative of an amount of flow turning that occurs from the inlet to the exit of the third stage vane 22. The inlet angle, α, is selected with reference to the flow direction coming from the second row blades 20, and the exit angle, β, is preferably selected to provide a predetermined direction of flow into the third stage blades 24.
It should be noted that the difference between any pair of airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV3, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 1 due to various conditions, such as manufacturing tolerances or other conditions. In particular, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV3, may generally vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 1 by at most 5%. More preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV3, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 1 by at most 3%. Most preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV3, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 1 by at most 1%. In other words, the amount of flow turning may vary slightly from the given predetermined delta value, Δ, within a percentage range of, for example, 5% to 1%. However, an optimal configuration for the airfoil of the vane 22 is believed to be provided by a configuration having a minimal variation from the given predetermined delta values, Δ.
Portions of sections of the airfoil for the vane 22 are described below in Table 2 (end of specification), generally located at the noted selected Z or spanwise locations described above for Table 1. It may be noted that the description provided by Table 2 comprises an exemplary, non-limiting description of leading edge and trailing edge airfoil sections forming the inlet and exit angles α, β.
The portions of the airfoil for the vane 22 described in Table 2 are provided with reference to a Cartesian coordinate system, as discussed above, that has orthogonally related X, Y and Z axes (
The leading edge section 50 at each Z location is described by successive data points N=1 to N=30 defining the leading edge section 50 as extending from the suction sidewall 40, around the leading edge 46, and along a portion of the pressure sidewall 38.
The trailing edge section 52 at each Z location is described in two parts. In particular, a first part of the trailing edge section 52 is described along the suction sidewall 40 by data points N=31 to N=40, and a second part of the trailing edge section 52 is described along the pressure sidewall 38 by data points N=41 to N=60. It may be noted that the data points N=31 and N=60 have the same X and Y coordinate values for continuity in presenting the data in Table 2, and are both located at or near the trailing edge 48 of the vane 22.
Referring to
The cross section of
At the trailing edge 68, a blade metal angle of the surfaces of the pressure and suction sides 58, 60 adjacent to the trailing edge 68 is provided for directing flow exiting from the blade 24 and defines an airfoil trailing edge (TE) or exit angle, β. The airfoil exit angle, α, is defined as an angle between a line 32P parallel to the longitudinal axis 32 and an extension of the airfoil mean line, CB3, at the trailing edge 68, i.e., tangential to the line CB3 at the airfoil trailing edge 68.
The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, for the airfoil of the blade 24 are as described in Table 3 below. The Z coordinate locations are presented as a percentage of the total span of the blade 24. The values for the inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are defined at selected locations spaced at 10% increments along the span of the blade 24, where 0% is located adjacent to the inner endwall 62 and 100% is located adjacent to the blade tip 64. The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are further graphically illustrated in
Table 3 further describes a predetermined difference between each pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles, at any given span location, as defined by a delta value, Δ, presented as the absolute value of the difference between the leading edge or inlet angle, α, and the trailing edge or exit angle, β. The delta value, Δ, is representative of a change of direction of the flow between the leading edge 66 and trailing edge 68, where it may be understood that the amount of work extracted from the working gas is related to the difference between the inlet angle, α, and exit angle, β, of the flow. For example, increasing the delta value, Δ, may increase the amount of work extracted from the flow.
It should be noted that the difference between any pair of airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB3, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 3 due to various conditions, such as manufacturing tolerances or other conditions. In particular, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB3, may generally vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 3 by at most 5%. More preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB3, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 3 by at most 3%. Most preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB3, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 3 by at most 1%. In other words, the amount of flow turning may vary slightly from the given predetermined delta value, Δ, within a percentage range of, for example, 5% to 1%. However, an optimal configuration for the airfoil of the blade 24 is believed to be provided by a configuration having a minimal variation from the given predetermined delta values, Δ.
Portions of sections of the airfoil for the blade 24 are described below in Table 4 (end of specification), generally located at the noted selected Z or spanwise locations described above for Table 3. It may be noted that the description provided by Table 4 comprises an exemplary, non-limiting description of leading edge and trailing edge airfoil sections forming the inlet and exit angles α, β.
The portions of the airfoil for the blade 24 described in Table 4 are provided with reference to a Cartesian coordinate system, as discussed above, that has orthogonally related X, Y and Z axes (
The leading edge section 70 at each Z location is described by successive data points N=1 to N=30 defining the leading edge section 70 as extending from the pressure sidewall 58, around the leading edge 66, and along a portion of the suction sidewall 60.
The trailing edge section 72 at each Z location is described in two parts. In particular, a first part of the trailing edge section 72 is described along the pressure sidewall 58 by data points N=31 to N=40, and a second part of the trailing edge section 52 is described along the suction sidewall 60 by data points N=41 to N=60. It may be noted that the data points N=31 and N=60 have the same X and Y coordinate values for continuity in presenting the data in Table 4, and are both located at or near the trailing edge 68 of the blade 24.
Referring to
The cross section of
At the trailing edge 88, a blade metal angle of the surfaces of the pressure and suction sides 78, 80 adjacent to the trailing edge 88 is provided for directing flow exiting from the vane 26 and defines an airfoil trailing edge (TE) or exit angle, β. The airfoil exit angle, β, is defined as an angle between a line 32P parallel to the longitudinal axis 32 and an extension of the airfoil mean line, CV4, at the trailing edge 88, i.e., tangential to the line CV4 at the airfoil trailing edge 88.
The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, for the airfoil of the vane 26 are as described in Table 5 below. The Z coordinate locations are presented as a percentage of the total span of the vane 26. The values for the inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are defined at selected locations spaced at 10% increments along the span of the vane 26, where 0% is located adjacent to the inner endwall 82 and 100% is located adjacent to the outer endwall 84. The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are further graphically illustrated in
Table 5 further describes a predetermined difference between each pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles, at any given span location, as defined by a delta value, Δ, presented as the absolute value of the difference between the leading edge or inlet angle, α, and the trailing edge or exit angle, β. The delta value, Δ, is representative of an amount of flow turning that occurs from the inlet to the exit of the fourth stage vane 26. The inlet angle, α, is selected with reference to the flow direction coming from the third row blades 24, and the exit angle, β, is preferably selected to provide a predetermined direction of flow into the fourth stage blades 28.
It should be noted that the difference between any pair of airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV4, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 5 due to various conditions, such as manufacturing tolerances or other conditions. In particular, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV4, may generally vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 5 by at most 5%. More preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV4, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 5 by at most 3%. Most preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SV4, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 5 by at most 1%. In other words, the amount of flow turning may vary slightly from the given predetermined delta value, Δ, within a percentage range of, for example, 5% to 1%. However, an optimal configuration for the airfoil of the vane 26 is believed to be provided by a configuration having a minimal variation from the given predetermined delta values, Δ.
Portions of sections of the airfoil for the vane 26 are described below in Table 6 (end of specification), generally located at the noted selected Z or spanwise locations described above for Table 5. It may be noted that the description provided by Table 6 comprises an exemplary, non-limiting description of leading edge and trailing edge airfoil sections forming the inlet and exit angles α, β.
The portions of the airfoil for the vane 26 described in Table 6 are provided with reference to a Cartesian coordinate system, as discussed above, that has orthogonally related X, Y and Z axes (
The leading edge section 90 at each Z location is described by successive data points N=1 to N=30 defining the leading edge section 90 as extending from the suction sidewall 80, around the leading edge 86, and along a portion of the pressure sidewall 78.
The trailing edge section 92 at each Z location is described in two parts. In particular, a first part of the trailing edge section 92 is described along the suction sidewall 80 by data points N=31 to N=40, and a second part of the trailing edge section 92 is described along the pressure sidewall 78 by data points N=41 to N=60. It may be noted that the data points N=31 and N=60 have the same X and Y coordinate values for continuity in presenting the data in Table 6, and are both located at or near the trailing edge 88 of the vane 26.
Referring to
The cross section of
At the trailing edge 108, a blade metal angle of the surfaces of the pressure and suction sides 98, 100 adjacent to the trailing edge 108 is provided for directing flow exiting from the blade 28 and defines an airfoil trailing edge (TE) or exit angle, β. The airfoil exit angle, β, is defined as an angle between a line 32P parallel to the longitudinal axis 32 and an extension of the airfoil mean line, CB4, at the trailing edge 108, i.e., tangential to the line CB4 at the airfoil trailing edge 108.
The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, for the airfoil of the blade 28 are as described in Table 7 below. The Z coordinate locations are presented as a percentage of the total span of the blade 28. The values for the inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are defined at selected locations spaced at 10% increments along the span of the blade 28, where 0% is located adjacent to the inner endwall 102 and 100% is located adjacent to the blade tip 104. The inlet angles, α, and exit angles, β, are further graphically illustrated in
Table 7 further describes a predetermined difference between each pair of the airfoil inlet and exit angles, at any given span location, as defined by a delta value, Δ, presented as the absolute value of the difference between the leading edge or inlet angle, α, and the trailing edge or exit angle, β. The delta value, Δ, is representative of a change of direction of the flow between the leading edge 106 and trailing edge 108, where it may be understood that the amount of work extracted from the working gas is related to the difference between the inlet angle, α, and exit angle, β, of the flow. For example, increasing the delta value, Δ, may increase the amount of work extracted from the flow.
It should be noted that the difference between any pair of airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB4, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 7 due to various conditions, such as manufacturing tolerances or other conditions. In particular, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB4, may generally vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 7 by at most 5%. More preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB4, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 7 by at most 3%. Most preferably, the difference between the airfoil inlet and exit angles, α, β, at any given span location, SB4, may vary from the delta value, Δ, listed in Table 7 by at most 1%. In other words, the amount of flow turning may vary slightly from the given predetermined delta value, Δ, within a percentage range of, for example, 5% to 1%. However, an optimal configuration for the airfoil of the blade 28 is believed to be provided by a configuration having a minimal variation from the given predetermined delta values, Δ.
Portions of sections of the airfoil for the blade 28 are described below in Table 8 (end of specification), generally located at the noted selected Z or spanwise locations described above for Table 7. It may be noted that the description provided by Table 8 comprises an exemplary, non-limiting description of leading edge and trailing edge airfoil sections forming the inlet and exit angles α, β.
The portions of the airfoil for the blade 28 described in Table 8 are provided with reference to a Cartesian coordinate system, as discussed above, that has orthogonally related X, Y and Z axes (
The leading edge section 110 at each Z location is described by successive data points N=1 to N=30 defining the leading edge section 106 as extending from the pressure sidewall 98, around the leading edge 106, and along a portion of the suction sidewall 100.
The trailing edge section 112 at each Z location is described in two parts. In particular, a first part of the trailing edge section 112 is described along the pressure sidewall 98 by data points N=31 to N=40, and a second part of the trailing edge section 112 is described along the suction sidewall 100 by data points N=41 to N=60. It may be noted that the data points N=31 and N=60 have the same X and Y coordinate values for continuity in presenting the data in Table 8, and are both located at or near the trailing edge 108 of the blade 28.
The tabular values given in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 below are in millimeters and represent leading edge section and trailing edge section profiles at ambient, non-operating or non-hot conditions and are for an uncoated airfoil. The sign convention assigns a positive value to the value Z, and positive and negative values for the X and Y coordinate values are determined relative to an origin of the coordinate system, as is typical of a Cartesian coordinate system.
The values presented in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 are generated and shown for determining the leading edge and trailing edge profile sections of the airfoil for the vane 22, blade 24, vane 26, and blade 28, respectively. Further, there are typical manufacturing tolerances as well as coatings which are typically accounted for in the actual profile of the airfoil for the vane 22, blade 24, vane 26, and blade 28. Accordingly, the values for the airfoil section profiles given in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 correspond to nominal dimensional values for uncoated airfoils. It will therefore be appreciated that typical manufacturing tolerances, i.e., plus or minus values and coating thicknesses, are additive to the X and Y values given in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 below. Accordingly, a distance of approximately ±1% of a maximum airfoil height, in a direction normal to any surface location along the leading edge and trailing edge profile sections of the airfoils, defines an airfoil profile envelope for the leading edge and trailing edge profile sections of the airfoils described herein.
The coordinate values given in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 below in millimeters provide an exemplary, non-limiting, preferred nominal profile envelope for the leading and trailing edge profile sections of the respective third stage vane 22, third stage blade 24, fourth stage vane 26 and fourth stage blade 28. Further, the average Z value at 100% span for each of the airfoils may be approximately the following values: third stage vane 22=1145 mm; third stage blade 24=1191.7 mm; fourth stage vane 26=1268.5 mm; and fourth stage blade 28=1366.9 mm.
It may be appreciated that the leading and trailing edge sections for the airfoils of the vane 22, blade 24, vane 26 and blade 28, as disclosed in the above Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8, may be scaled up or down geometrically for use in other similar turbine designs. Consequently, the coordinate values set forth in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 may be scaled upwardly or downwardly such that the airfoil section shapes remain unchanged. A scaled version of the coordinates in Tables 2, 4, 6 and 8 could be represented by X, Y and Z coordinate values multiplied or divided by the same constant or number.
It is believed that the vane 22, blade 24, vane 26 and blade 28, constructed with the described average angle changes, provide and improved or optimized flow of working gases passing from the turbine section 12 to the diffuser 34, with improved Mach numbers for the flow passing through the third and fourth stages of the turbine. In particular, the design for the airfoil angles of the third and fourth stages are configured provide a better balance between the Mach numbers for the third and fourth stages, which is believed to provide an improved performance through these stages, since losses are generally proportional to the square of the Mach number.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/543,850, filed Oct. 6, 2011, entitled “GAS TURBINE WITH OPTIMIZED AIRFOIL ELEMENT ANGLES”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4900230 | Patel | Feb 1990 | A |
| 5352092 | Ferleger et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5980209 | Barry et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6779977 | Lagrange et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 7229248 | Ito et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7568889 | Mohan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7618240 | Saltman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7625184 | Jay et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632072 | Sheffield | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632075 | Liang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7648334 | Hurst et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7648340 | Sadler et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7722329 | Clarke | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7731483 | DeLong et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7837445 | Benjamin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7988420 | Arness et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8147207 | Orosa et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 20050220625 | Chandraker | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20080118362 | Hu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226454 | Decker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090274554 | Guemmer | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20110076150 | Grafitti et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150659 | Micheli et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150660 | Micheli et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2317077 | May 2011 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130089415 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61543850 | Oct 2011 | US |
