This application claims priority to German Patent Application No. 102011119564.9, filed Nov. 26, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This application relates to a gasbag for a pedestrian protection system on a motor vehicle, which is provided so as to be inflated immediately when the vehicle comes into contact with a pedestrian, thereby cushioning the impact of the latter on the body.
For example, such a gasbag or a motor vehicle equipped therewith is known from DE 10 2005 041 274 A1. This conventional gasbag is tightly folded together under the rear edge of a front opening hood of the motor vehicle in an idle state, and when inflated, it first lifts up the front opening hood, to then expand through a gap created by lifting the hood, over a lower edge of a windshield adjoining the front opening hood and over the A-column that laterally encases the windshield. When the head of a pedestrian strikes the rear edge of the front opening hood, the hood is to yield at least at the point of impact, and the gasbag made flexible by the compressibility of the gas contained therein is to decelerate the penetrating motion of the head and, if at all possible, prevent it from breaking through into non-deformable fixtures in the engine compartment. Since the front opening hood disperses the force of impact over a large surface, a slight excess pressure in the gasbag is sufficient to build up the counterforce required to decelerate the impact.
However, if the head hits one of the end regions of the gasbag covering the A-columns, there is no structure to disperse the force of impact. Therefore, the deceleration experienced by the head given the same excess pressure in the gasbag is less when it strikes the end regions than when it hits the hood, and the danger of the head breaking through all the way to the A-column already exists at a relatively low speed of impact.
Made known by EP 1 072 479 B1 was a gasbag for installation in a motor vehicle steering wheel, which is comprised of cloth panels varying in permeability, so as to achieve a desired overall permeability for the gasbag.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide improved gasbags for a pedestrian protection system that is able to effectively protect the head of a pedestrian, regardless of whether the latter strikes the front opening hood or parts of the motor vehicle body adjoining the latter. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will be apparent from the subsequent detailed description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the foregoing technical field and background.
In accordance with various embodiments, a gasbag for a pedestrian protection system is provided. The gasbag in the inflated state encompasses a first, oblong central section and end sections angled away from the ends of the first central section, in which the first central section is more strongly cushioned than the end sections. While a strong cushioning in the central section allows the latter to yield more easily when exposed to the force of an impact dispersed over a large area by the front opening hood, this is not the case at the end sections. In this way, the gasbag can be inflated with a high pressure required for effective protection at the end sections without the inherently desired flexibility of the first central section being lost as a result.
The desired cushioning can be realized with a variety of means, e.g., by arranging valves between the sections of the gasbag and the environment, so that gas can escape to the outside when a limiting pressure is exceeded via weak spots in the membrane that tear open when exposed to a high enough stress. In one embodiment, the gasbag exhibits at least one first and one second membrane with differing permeability values, and the membranes are distributed in such a way that an average permeability of the end sections is lower than an average permeability of the first central section.
A second central section can extend next to the first central section between the end sections, so as to cover the lower edge of a windshield adjoining the front opening hood during use. In order to be able to maintain a high pressure here as well, and thereby diminish the risk of penetration, the average permeability of the second central section may be lower than for the first central section.
In order to be able to inflate the gasbag in the shortest possible time when needed, a supply port can be provided for a gas generator, which can be located centrally on the first central section, and at least one of the other sections of the gasbag can be supplied with gas via the first central section. All other sections can be supplied via the first central section.
It is also conceivable to provide a distributor, which exhibits a supply port for a gas generator on the one hand, and ports connected with the central section and end sections on the other. By suitably selecting the length and cross section of the lines leading from the supply port to the ports of the individual sections, such a distributor makes it possible to control the deployment behavior of the individual sections.
In order to be able to simultaneously inflate the individual sections from the same gas generator, pathways are present for the gas to get from the gas generator to each section of the gasbag. However, to prevent a high permeability in the first central section from also leading to a premature pressure drop at the end sections, for example, two of the gasbag sections can be interconnected by a check valve, which only allows the respective gas to flow from an upstream to a downstream location of the two sections.
The downstream location of the two sections should exhibit a lower average permeability than the upstream section. In this way, a high pressure can initially be generated in both sections when igniting the gas generator, e.g., which in the case of the first central section is beneficial in quickly lifting up the front opening hood, and the pressure in the upstream section can again be allowed to fall shortly thereafter, while the high pressure remains intact in the downstream section, or the pressure at least drops more slowly than in the upstream section.
The two sections can extend on different sides of a membrane that partitions the gasbag; in this case, the check valve can be situated at a passageway of the membrane.
In particular a flap valve can be used as the check valve. One flap of this flap valve can be flexible like the membrane of the gasbag, so that it can deploy in conjunction with the latter while the gasbag inflates.
In another embodiment, the two sections border each other along a seam, and the check valve is situated in a gap in the seam.
In particular a lip valve is suitable for this type of attachment.
The first and second membrane with the different permeability values can be obtained from an identical initial fabric through varying impregnation, wherein the more permeable membrane can also remain unimpregnated.
In further embodiments, a motor vehicle with a gasbag of the kind described above is provided, wherein, in the inflated state, the first central section of the gasbag supports a front opening hood of the motor vehicle, and the end sections cover A-columns of the motor vehicle.
The present disclosure will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and:
The following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the disclosure or the application and uses. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any theory presented in the preceding background or the following detailed description.
In a simplified, perspective view,
The membrane on the lower side of the central section 6 incorporates an opening 10, to which the gas generator 11 is connected.
Stretched inside the gasbag 1 at the lateral ends of the central section 6 are internal membranes 12, which separate the central section 6 from the end sections 8. A respective check valve 13 is formed in the membranes 12, which allows the gas fed into the first central section 6 by the gas generator 11 to flow over into the end sections 8, but blocks the way back to the central section 6.
Another check valve 14 is arranged in an interrupted segment of the seam 9 between the central sections 6, 7, so as to allow gas to flow over from the first into the second central section 7, but block a return flow to the central section 6. Secured between the end sections 8 and the second central section 7 are impermeable membranes 15, so that no gas exchange takes place there.
The impermeability referenced here with respect to the gasbag 1 and the membranes that comprise it should not necessarily be taken to mean hermetic impermeability. In order to be regarded as impermeable within the context of the present disclosure, it is sufficient that the permeability of a membrane be so low that pressure changes owing to the passage of gas through the membrane during the time elapsed from the point where gas generator 11 is activated to the point where the impacting pedestrian has stopped decelerating are low enough not to significantly influence the deceleration process.
The two membranes 16, 17 are here attached to each other by the seam 9 interrupted at the level of sectional plane III-III; overlapping portions of the membranes 16, 17 can also be flatly adhesively bonded or welded, e.g., on edge strips 18 of the membrane 17 that protrude over the seam 9. However, in the case shown on
The check valve 14 that joins the two sections 6, 7 is here designed as a lip valve. Two lips 19 of the valve 14 are here each formed by edge strips of the membrane 16, which instead of being joined together by the seam 9, protrude into the second central section 7.
A passage with an inserted mesh 20 is visible in the membrane 12 on a bulkhead of the first central section 6. Situated opposite the mesh 20, on the side of the membrane 12 facing the end section 8, is a flexible, possibly also elastically extensible, impermeable membrane piece 21, which completely covers the passage provided with the mesh 20. The mesh 20 and membrane piece 21 together form the check valve 13.
In the configuration on
As in the first embodiment, the second central section 7 is joined indirectly with the gas generator 11 by way of a valve 14 inserted in the seam 9 between the sections 6, 7.
A second difference independent of the presence or absence of the distributor 25 has to do with the fact that, as evident in particular in the cross section on
A third difference lies in the fact that, as opposed to the seam 9 in the cross section on
In the embodiment on
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing an exemplary embodiment, it being understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described in an exemplary embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 119 564 | Nov 2011 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3840246 | McCullough et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3883154 | McCullough et al. | May 1975 | A |
5382051 | Glance | Jan 1995 | A |
5556128 | Sinnhuber et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5586782 | Zimmerman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6059312 | Staub et al. | May 2000 | A |
6467563 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474679 | Miyasaka et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497302 | Ryan | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6715786 | Willibey | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6883631 | Hu et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6910713 | Keshavaraj | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920954 | Hashimoto et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6955238 | Takimoto | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7137738 | Shah et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7243754 | Mori et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7341274 | Mori et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7390014 | Takimoto | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7438473 | Borchardt | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7584988 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7963557 | Aho et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8104563 | Narita et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8235159 | Mildner | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8302989 | Takimoto et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20030155750 | Hu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030178239 | Takimoto | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030213635 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040124620 | Keshavaraj | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050205333 | Mori et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206139 | Mori et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060201731 | Nakamura | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070023223 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070114090 | Okamoto et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070296186 | Kwon | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080296875 | Aho et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014988 | Takimoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100230944 | Narita et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300792 | Yuan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100307854 | Mildner | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110278087 | Okamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140027195 | Kalliske et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2115146 | Oct 1971 | DE |
19541513 | May 1996 | DE |
19847854 | Apr 2000 | DE |
10102597 | Sep 2002 | DE |
10254589 | Jun 2003 | DE |
60005892 | Jul 2004 | DE |
102005041274 | Mar 2006 | DE |
1072479 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2004299516 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004299518 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2007253923 | Oct 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
German Patent Office, Search Report for German Application No. 102011119564.9, dated Jul. 12, 2012. |
Great Britain Patent Office, Great Britain Search Report for Great Britain Application No. 12211117.3, dated Mar. 22, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130133971 A1 | May 2013 | US |