Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
The present disclosure generally relates to a medical gases delivery system. More particularly, certain features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure relate to a respiratory gases delivery system that mixes different respiratory gases and measures properties or characteristics of the mixed gases.
A gases delivery system may be used to provide respiratory gases to a patient. The gases delivery system may include a humidification device to condition the gases provided to the patient. The gases may be heated and/or humidified prior to delivery. Gases are delivered to the patient via a tube that is in fluid communication with a patient interface. Gases delivered to patients at 100% relative humidity and 37° C. generally mimic properties of air resulting from the transformation that occurs as air passes through airways from the nose to the lungs. This can promote efficient gases exchange and ventilation in the lungs, aid defense mechanisms in the airways, and increase patient comfort during treatment. In some cases, a gases delivery system used for oxygen therapy may provide oxygen to the patient. The oxygen may be mixed with air to provide a desired or targeted therapy to the patient. In such cases, a gases delivery system may monitor the concentration of oxygen to ensure that the desired or targeted amount is being delivered to the patient and to reduce or prevent wastage of oxygen.
An aspect of at least one of the embodiments disclosed herein includes the realization that there are problems associated with typical approaches to mixing gases and measuring properties of mixed gases. Typical gases delivery systems may use a combination of gases, such as oxygen and air, but may not mix these sufficiently. Sensors used to measure properties of such a combination of gases may produce unreliable results. Flow rate and gases concentration measurements may both be affected by insufficient gases mixing. A mixing chamber may be used to enable sufficient mixing of gases; however, the size of a typical mixing chamber may cause the gases delivery system to be bulky or undesirably large. Typical mixing chambers may induce turbulence to encourage mixing between gases; however, turbulence may result in an acoustically noisy process and may lead to difficulties when measuring gases properties such as gases flow rate, gases concentration, or the like. Some systems may use ultrasonic sensors to measure a gases property such as concentration by inducing pressure waves that are generally perpendicular to the flow direction of the gases. Some of these systems may position a pair of ultrasonic sensors in close proximity to each other, which may increase the sensitivity of the system. In such systems, one or more additional sensors may be used to determine the gases flow rate.
The gases delivery systems and methods disclosed herein constitute improvements over typical gases delivery systems. A measurement apparatus of a gases delivery system can comprise a measuring chamber positioned within a mixing chamber in a coaxial arrangement. The coaxial chamber arrangement may increase a gases path length through the measurement apparatus while remaining more compact relative to linear or serial chamber arrangements. The mixing chamber can be configured to sufficiently mix gases before the gases move to the measuring chamber. A mixing element within the mixing chamber may induce swirling of the gases to promote mixing, this being accomplished with little or no turbulence. At least one ultrasonic sensor can be located at each end of the measuring chamber to measure gases properties or characteristics along the gases flow. Gases concentration, flow rate, and velocity can be measured using the ultrasonic sensors.
Other embodiments can comprise a mixing chamber comprising a baffle configured to promote turbulent mixing of the gases and a vane configured to linearize the gases to improve measurement of the gases properties in the measuring chamber.
At least one aspect of the present disclosure relates to a gases measurement apparatus comprising a gases measuring chamber, a controller, and first and second ultrasonic sensors. The gases measuring chamber comprises a gases flow path from a first end to a second end of the gases measuring chamber. A downstream direction is defined along the gases flow path from the first end to the second end. An upstream direction is defined along the gases flow path from the second end to the first end. The first ultrasonic sensor is positioned at the first end of the gases measuring chamber. The first ultrasonic sensor is configured to transmit a downstream acoustic pulse train in a first measurement phase. The first ultrasonic sensor is configured to detect an upstream acoustic pulse train in a second measurement phase. The first ultrasonic sensor is configured to send a signal to the controller. The second ultrasonic sensor is positioned at the second end of the gases measuring chamber. The second ultrasonic sensor is configured to transmit the upstream acoustic pulse train in the second measurement phase. The second ultrasonic sensor is configured to detect the downstream acoustic pulse train in the first measurement phase. The second ultrasonic sensor is configured to send a signal to the controller. The controller is configured to determine a characteristic of the gases based at least in part on a signal received from the first ultrasonic sensor and a signal received from the second ultrasonic sensor.
The gases can comprise two gases. The two gases can comprise oxygen and air. The downstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a plurality of acoustic pulses. The upstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a plurality of acoustic pulses. The downstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a single acoustic pulse. The upstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a single acoustic pulse. The characteristic of the gases can comprise at least one of gases concentration, flow rate, or velocity. The first ultrasonic sensor can be configured to be excited at a natural resonant frequency. The second ultrasonic sensor can be configured to be excited at a natural resonant frequency. The controller can be configured to determine a downstream time of flight for the downstream acoustic pulse train. The controller can be configured to determine an upstream time of flight for the upstream acoustic pulse train. The controller can be configured to determine the characteristic of the gases based at least in part on the downstream time of flight and the upstream time of flight.
At least one aspect of the present disclosure relates to a method for determining a characteristic of gases flowing through an apparatus along a gases flow path from a first end to a second end of the apparatus, the apparatus comprising a first ultrasonic sensor positioned at the first end and a second ultrasonic sensor positioned at the second end. A downstream direction is defined along the gases flow path from the first end to the second end. An upstream direction is defined along the gases flow path from the second end to the first end.
The method comprises transmitting a downstream acoustic pulse train from the first ultrasonic sensor. The method comprises detecting the downstream acoustic pulse train at the second ultrasonic sensor. The method comprises determining a downstream time of flight based at least in part on the downstream acoustic pulse train. The method comprises transmitting an upstream acoustic pulse train from the second ultrasonic sensor. The method comprises detecting the upstream acoustic pulse train at the first ultrasonic sensor. The method comprises determining an upstream time of flight based at least in part on the upstream acoustic pulse train. The method comprises determining the characteristic of the gases based at least in part on the downstream time of flight and the upstream time of flight. The downstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a plurality of acoustic pulses. The upstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a plurality of acoustic pulses. The downstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a single acoustic pulse. The upstream acoustic pulse train can comprise a single acoustic pulse.
The method can comprise transmitting a second downstream acoustic pulse train from the first ultrasonic sensor. The method can comprise detecting the second downstream acoustic pulse train at the second ultrasonic sensor. The method can comprise determining the downstream time of flight based at least in part on an average of the downstream acoustic pulse train and the second downstream acoustic pulse train. The method can comprise transmitting a second upstream acoustic pulse train from the second ultrasonic sensor. The method can comprise detecting the second upstream acoustic pulse train at the first ultrasonic sensor. The method can comprise determining the upstream time of flight based at least in part on an average of the upstream acoustic pulse train and the second upstream acoustic pulse train. The characteristic of the gases can comprise at least one of gases concentration, flow rate, or velocity. Transmitting a downstream acoustic pulse train from the first ultrasonic sensor can comprise exciting the first ultrasonic sensor at a natural resonant frequency. Transmitting an upstream acoustic pulse train from the second ultrasonic sensor can comprise exciting the second ultrasonic sensor at the natural resonant frequency.
The gases can comprise oxygen and air. Determining the characteristic of the gases can comprise determining an oxygen concentration as a volume percentage by multiplying the concentration in air of gases other than oxygen with the difference between an average downstream and upstream time of flight for the gases and an average downstream and upstream time of flight for air, dividing that by the difference between an average downstream and upstream time of flight for oxygen and an average downstream and upstream time of flight for air, and then adding to the result the oxygen concentration of air.
Determining the characteristic of the gases can comprise determining a flow rate in liters per minute for a given oxygen concentration by subtracting the downstream time of flight from the upstream time of flight, subtracting from that a calibrated correction for the gases mixture, and then multiplying the result by a constant factor for geometric aspects of the apparatus. The calibrated correction for the gases mixture can be determined by subtracting a calibrated correction for air from a calibrated correction for oxygen, multiplying the result by the difference between the given oxygen concentration and 20.9 (the oxygen concentration of air expressed as a percentage), dividing that result by the concentration as a volume percentage of gases in air other than oxygen, and then adding the calibrated correction for air.
At least one aspect of the present disclosure relates to a gases delivery apparatus comprising a gases mixing chamber and a gases measuring chamber. The gases mixing chamber is configured to receive gases from a gases source. The gases mixing chamber comprises a gases flow path from a first end to a second end of the gases mixing chamber. The gases mixing chamber comprises at least one mixing element situated within the gases flow path. The gases measuring chamber is configured to receive gases from the gases mixing chamber. The gases measuring chamber comprises a gases flow path from a first end to a second end of the gases measuring chamber. The gases measuring chamber is situated coaxially within the gases mixing chamber. The at least one mixing element is configured to mix gases in the gases flow path of the gases mixing chamber before the gases enter the gases flow path of the gases measuring chamber.
The at least one mixing element can comprise a vane that is configured to reduce turbulence in gases that flow from the gases flow path of the gases mixing chamber to the gases flow path of the gases measuring chamber. The at least one mixing element can comprise a baffle that is configured to increase the length of the gases flow path of the gases mixing chamber. The gases mixing chamber can be configured to receive two or more gases. The gases mixing chamber can be configured to mix the received gases. The apparatus can comprise a first ultrasonic sensor positioned at the first end of the gases measuring chamber. The apparatus can comprise a second ultrasonic sensor positioned at the second end of the gases measuring chamber.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the disclosed systems and methods will be described with respect to the following figures, which are intended to illustrate and not to limit the disclosed embodiments.
A gases delivery system can be configured to deliver respiratory gases to a patient. The respiratory gases can be conditioned to have targeted or desirable properties. These properties can be selected to provide therapeutic effects for a patient, to increase comfort of a patient during therapy, or to otherwise improve respiration for the patient. Some gases delivery systems can be configured to provide a mixture of gases to a patient. For example, a gases delivery system can be configured to provide air mixed with oxygen to a patient. The concentration of oxygen in the gases mixture can be measured and maintained by the gases delivery system using a control feedback loop. For example, the gases delivery system can comprise a measurement apparatus configured to measure the concentrations of component gases in the gases mixture and a controller configured to control a valve to regulate the contribution of at least one of the component gases to the gases mixture, based at least in part on the measurements provided by the measurement apparatus. The measurement apparatus can comprise a mixing chamber configured to efficiently mix the component gases prior to entry of the mixed gases into a measuring chamber where the mixed gases can be measured. The accuracy of measurements provided by such a measurement apparatus may be superior to measurements provided by other devices that do not sufficiently mix the gases prior to measurement.
As an example, a gases delivery system can be configured to mix two component gases and control the contribution of at least one of the component gases to the gases mixture via one or more control valves. The gases delivery system can be configured to mix the component gases into a substantially homogeneous binary mixture. The gases delivery system can comprise ultrasonic transducers or sensors configured to generate and detect pressure waves along the flow of gases through a measuring chamber to determine gas concentrations or relative ratios of the component gases. The output of the ultrasonic sensors can be signals indicative of properties or characteristics of the gases. The gases delivery system can comprise a mixing chamber configured to direct the flow of gases along a spiraling gases flow path around the outside of the measuring chamber, the measuring chamber being situated coaxially within the mixing chamber. A coaxial chamber arrangement can provide a relatively long gases flow path to promote efficient mixing of gases as well as a relatively long distance between the ultrasonic sensors to improve measurement accuracy. In some embodiments, the gases delivery system can comprise baffles and/or vanes. The gases delivery system can operate the one or more control valves based at least in part on measurements of concentrations of component gases to maintain a targeted or desired relative ratio of gases in the gases mixture.
Gases Delivery System
The blower 10 as herein described can comprise a gases source, a ventilation device, a flow generator, a fan, or a combination of these or the like. In some embodiments, the blower 10 is configured to provide air to the measurement apparatus 20. In some embodiments, the measurement apparatus 20 is further configured to receive a second gas or additional gases to mix with the air provided by the blower 10.
The patient interface 16 as herein described can comprise a nasal mask, an oral mask, a full face mask, a nasal cannula, nasal pillows, a tracheal mask, insufflation device, or the like. The systems and methods disclosed herein may be used with invasive or non-invasive therapies, and, in some embodiments, with laparoscopic therapies.
The gases delivered to the patient 18 can comprise air, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, or a combination of any of the gases listed above. It is to be understood that other gases or combinations of gases may also fall within the scope of the present disclosure. As an example, the measurement apparatus 20 can be configured to mix two component gases to provide a binary gases mixture to the patient 18. Each of the component gases in a binary gases mixture may comprise a pure gas or a mixture of gases. A particular example of a binary gases mixture is a mixture of oxygen and air, where air and oxygen are considered component gases of the binary gases mixture even though air is itself a mixture of gases that includes oxygen. The present disclosure will describe apparatus and systems operating on a binary gases mixture of oxygen and air, but it is to be understood that the apparatus and systems will operate in similar fashion on any binary gases mixture.
The measurement apparatus 20 can be configured to mix gases from the blower 10 and/or an additional source of gases to provide a substantially well-mixed gases mixture to the patient 18. As used herein, a substantially well-mixed gases mixture can comprise a substantially homogeneous gases mixture. As an example, a substantially homogeneous gases mixture can refer to a gases mixture that is substantially mixed and that has a generally uniform temperature (e.g., a temperature that is sufficiently consistent or uniform such that variations within the mixture are not clinically relevant). As another example, a substantially homogeneous gases mixture can refer to a gases mixture that is substantially uniform with respect to a gases concentration gradient and/or a temperature gradient, such that any differences between high and low measurements of concentration and/or temperature are not clinically relevant. In contrast, a non-homogeneous gases mixture, for example, may display transient changes in gases properties or characteristics (e.g., flow rate or temperature) that may lead to inaccuracies in gases measurements. It may be advantageous for the measurement apparatus 20 to provide a substantially homogeneous gases mixture because more accurate gases measurements may be achieved more quickly for a substantially homogeneous gases mixture than for a non-homogeneous gases mixture.
In the gases delivery system 1, a transient state (e.g., a period of time during which a concentration of gases is changing) may be shorter than for a system without the measurement apparatus 20, which may allow for faster sampling rates. Thus, the time it takes to detect changes in the concentration of gases can be similar to the time it takes for the gases to transit through the measurement apparatus 20. The time taken for these changes to be detected by the measurement apparatus 20 may depend, at least in part, on the volume of the measurement apparatus 20 and the flow rate of gases through the gases delivery system 1.
Accuracy of sensing may be improved due at least in part to features of the measurement apparatus 20 that increase heat transfer from the gases flowing through the measurement apparatus 20 to a housing of the measurement apparatus 20 and reduce heat transfer from the gases to the environment, such as but not limited to tracks formed on a surface of a printed circuit board (PCB) or a moulded component, a conductive path assembled into the measurement apparatus 20, or the like. This may help to reduce the influence of stem effects on measurement accuracy. High flow rates near a wall of the housing may lead to a high rate of heat transfer between the gases and the housing, which may improve the response time of the materials of the housing to temperature changes and thus ensure that the housing temperature remains generally uniform during a measurement phase. This may be important when determining gases concentration based at least in part on the influence of temperature on the relationship of the actual distance between the sensors and a calibrated distance, which may in turn affect the accuracy of the calculated oxygen concentration. Material properties of the housing can be chosen to reduce or minimize dimensional changes that occur with changes in temperature, which may affect the measurement path length, thereby reducing sensitivity to external parameters.
Oxygen, or other supplementary gases such as but not limited to carbon dioxide, may be supplied to the gases delivery system 1 from a wall source, a gases bottle, or the like. In some embodiments, the supplementary gases can be supplied to the gases delivery system 1 through the measurement apparatus 20.
The gases delivery system 1 can comprise a control system 9 configured to receive measurements or signals from sensors in the gases delivery system 1, control delivery of power to the heating device 8, receive signals from the measurement apparatus 20, control speed or flow rate of the blower 10, and the like. The control system 9 can comprise a controller and data storage device. The controller can comprise one or more microprocessors, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays, or the like. The controller can be configured to execute computer executable instructions stored on the data storage device. The data storage device can comprise one or more non-transitory storage devices such as solid state drives, hard disk drives, ROMs, EEPROMs, RAM, and the like. In some embodiments, the control system 9 can be a part of the humidifier 4, part of the blower assembly 2, or part of both the humidifier 4 and the blower assembly 2.
Measurement Apparatus
Air enters the mixing chamber 21, such as from the blower 10, via an air inlet 30. Oxygen, or another supplementary gas or combination of gases, enters the mixing chamber 21 via an oxygen inlet 32. The inner diameter of the oxygen inlet 32 can be substantially smaller than that of the air inlet 30. One advantage of such a configuration is that the oxygen will enter the mixing chamber 21 at a higher velocity than will the air. This can encourage the air to travel along a longer path length, and may also increase the time that the air and the oxygen are in contact with each other, promoting increased mixing of the air and the oxygen. The air inlet 30 may be positioned such that it is offset from the oxygen inlet 32. The oxygen inlet 32 may be located such that the oxygen does not pass near the air inlet 30 where it could be redirected towards the blower 10, as that may result in a loss of oxygen.
The mixing element 24 is located in the mixing chamber 21 of the measurement apparatus 20. The mixing element 24 promotes a swirling flow of the air and the oxygen around the mixing chamber 21 and towards the measuring chamber 22.
In some embodiments, the measuring chamber 22 is conical in shape. For example, an entrance of the measuring chamber 22 can be larger than an exit of the measuring chamber 22. An inner diameter of the measuring chamber 22 can decrease along the direction of flow. In certain implementations, an inner wall of the measuring chamber 22 can form an angle with a longitudinal axis of the measuring chamber 22 of less than or equal to about 5 degrees, less than or equal to about 4 degrees, less than or equal to about 3 degrees, or less than or equal to about 1.5 degrees. In some implementations, an entrance of the measuring chamber 22 can be larger than an exit of the measuring chamber 22 by about 5%, by about 3%, or by about 2%. For example, where an inner wall of the measuring chamber 22 is substantially conical, gases can enter the measuring chamber 22 through an entrance that has a radius that is at least about 2-3% larger than a radius of an exit through which gases leave the measuring chamber 22. In some embodiments, a cross-sectional width of the measuring chamber 22 decreases along the direction of flow of gases. The decrease in cross-sectional width is not necessarily linear, but can have any suitable form.
As illustrated, the measurement apparatus 40 comprises two baffles 44a, 44b, but a different number of baffles may be used, such as but not limited to one, three, or four baffles. The baffle 44a may be located at or near the air inlet 30 to encourage mixing of the air and the oxygen near the entry of the air and/or the oxygen. The baffle 44b may be located further downstream from the baffle 44a. The vane 46 may be a continuation of the baffle 44b or may be located further downstream from the baffle 44b. The spacing between each of the baffles 44a, 44b and the spacing between the baffle 44b and the vane 46 may be affected by the geometry of the mixing chamber 41. In some embodiments, the spacing between the baffle 44b and the vane 46 can be similar to the spacing between each of the baffles 44a, 44b. It is to be understood that different variations of spacing between these features may exist. The baffles 44a, 44b may increase the path length that the gases travel as they move through the mixing chamber 41. The baffles 44a, 44b may induce turbulence to encourage mixing between the air and the oxygen. The positioning of the baffles 44a, 44b can be configured to enable the gases to be substantially mixed in a relatively small space. The baffles 44a, 44b can be orientated perpendicular to the direction of the flow of gases. In some embodiments, the baffles 44a, 44b can be orientated non-perpendicular to the direction of the flow of gases while still inducing turbulence to improve mixing of gases.
The vane 46 can be configured to cause the turbulent, unsteady gases to become more laminar, enabling the gases to be substantially more stable, with fewer fluctuations, by the time they reach the measuring chamber 22. The vane 46 may also reduce pressure-induced acoustic noise in the gases delivery system 1 by reducing the turbulence of the gases. Due at least in part to the positioning of the baffles 44a, 44b, the vane 46 may increase the stability of the gases and may cause the gases to be more laminar, even at relatively high flow rates.
The measuring chamber 22 may be the inner chamber of a coaxial arrangement. Gases move from the mixing chamber 21, 41 into the measuring chamber 22. The measuring chamber 22 may comprise ultrasonic transducers, transceivers, or sensors 26 at each end, as shown in
Ultrasonic Sensing
Each of the ultrasonic sensors 26 alternately transmits and receives pressure waves along the gases flow path. In a preferred embodiment, a first one of the ultrasonic sensors 26, configured as a transmitter, transmits a pulse series in a downstream direction along the gases flow path. A second one of the ultrasonic sensors 26, configured as a receiver, detects the transmitted pulses after a first period of time. When the transmission of the pulse series from the first one of the ultrasonic sensors 26 is complete, the configuration of the ultrasonic sensors 26 is reversed: the second one of the ultrasonic sensors 26 transmits a series of pulses in an upstream direction along the gases flow path, and the first one of the ultrasonic sensors 26 detects the transmitted pulses after a second period of time. A downstream direction is defined as a direction with or following the direction of the flow of gases along the gases flow path. An upstream direction is defined as a direction against or opposite the direction of the flow of gases (and thus opposite the downstream direction) along the gases flow path. The first and second time periods may or may not be of the same length; when they differ, generally the first time period (for the downstream transmission) will be shorter than the second time period (for the upstream transmission). Transmission and detection of pulses along the gases flow path in both directions may reduce the susceptibility of the measurement apparatus 20, 40 to system variations. In some embodiments, it is feasible to transmit only in a single direction.
Sensing along the gases flow path may allow any or all of the following gases properties or characteristics to be measured: velocity, flow rate, and/or oxygen concentration. Sensing along the gases flow path may enable these gases properties to be determined without the need for additional sensors. For redundancy and/or improvement of accuracy purposes, additional sensors, such as but not limited to temperature or humidity sensors, may be incorporated within the gases delivery system 1 without departing from the scope of the disclosed systems and methods. Sensing along the gases flow path enables the sensing to occur within a closed system. It may be advantageous for the gases delivery system 1 to be a closed system to improve the capability of the gases delivery system 1 to contain oxygen (e.g., to reduce the likelihood of oxygen leaks) and to prolong the life of plastic components in the gases delivery system 1.
The time an ultrasonic pulse takes to travel from one end of the measuring chamber 22 to the other, herein referred to as the time of flight, as well as the length and geometry of the measuring chamber 22, can be used to determine the velocity of the gases and the gases concentration based on the speed of sound. Changes in gases concentration may predictably affect the time of flight of ultrasonic signals in each direction along the gases flow path. Temperature sensors may be included in the gases delivery system 1 to enable detection of any temperature changes that may also affect changes to calculations of the speed of sound in the gases mixture.
It is to be understood that various frequencies may be used for the ultrasonic sensing and, thus, the scope of the disclosed systems and methods is not to be limited to a specific value. For purposes of an example only, in some embodiments, a frequency of approximately 25 kHz is used.
Ultrasonic sensing can provide faster responses and redundancy to the measurement apparatus 20, 40. Measurements in the measurement apparatus 20, 40 and information regarding the flow rate of the gases can be generated quickly relative to other sensing systems. Redundancy may be provided in the form of an in-built verification of measured gases properties. If an unlikely gases flow rate has been detected, this may imply that the oxygen concentration detected is incorrect. Similarly, if an unlikely oxygen concentration is detected, this may indicate that the gases flow rate is incorrect. Such redundancy may help to improve safety factors at the lower and higher extremes for flow rate. The gases that enter the measuring chamber 22 may be substantially mixed, which may reduce inconsistencies in measurements that may occur from unmixed gases.
A pulse can be defined as a peak of a single cycle associated with the driving frequency of a transducer. A pulse series may use a plurality of cycles and may detect a chosen amount of peaks. A pulse series may be defined by the period of time for which a transducer transmits the desired excitation frequency, such that a desired number of peaks may be transmitted. The number of transmitted cycles, the dispersion characteristics of the ultrasonic transducers 26 and the physical design of the measurement apparatus 20, 40 may be controlled to reduce or minimize multi-path interference in the measurement apparatus 20, 40. The time interval between transmission sequences may be configured to be shorter than the time of flight and to not cause significant interference. A single pulse may be less sensitive to the effect of multi-path interference due at least in part to the dispersion characteristics of the ultrasonic transducers 26 and the effects of the physical design of the measurement apparatus 20, 40 on the received signal.
A pulse series may be used advantageously to transmit a measurement signal that may be higher in amplitude and less sensitive to electronic noise than a single pulse. Use of the pulse series may also enable the ultrasonic sensors 26 to be excited at the driving frequency and may help to ensure that the acoustic period of the driving frequency is known, thereby removing or reducing issues that may be caused by a resonant response, such as phase delay. The driving frequency may not necessarily equal the natural frequency of the ultrasonic sensors 26, which is dependent on temperature, gases concentration, and sensor construction. The time period between when each peak may be determined from the phase shift between the transmitted signal, the received signal, and the measured temperature of the gases mixture. Peak discrimination may be easier at lower frequencies due to larger time intervals between pulses. The pulse series may yield a large sample of readings which can be processed using averaging techniques to improve accuracy.
Calculations of the speed of sound in the mixed gases can be affected by temperature and/or humidity. To improve the accuracy of calculations of the speed of sound, temperature and/or humidity corrections can be made. For example, based on properties of an ideal gas, the speed of sound is proportional to the square root of temperature. Temperature can be measured in the gases delivery system 1 for use as a correction factor. For example, temperature sensors may be located at the input of the measuring chamber 22 and, in some embodiments, at the output of the measurement apparatus 20, 40 as the gases enter the humidification chamber 6 via the blower conduit 12. In some embodiments, measurement methods disclosed herein can be performed without the use of temperature corrections. In some embodiments, systems and methods disclosed herein can maintain the measuring chamber 22 at or near a targeted temperature, thus allowing calculations of the speed of sound to be performed without the use of temperature corrections.
As another example, changes in humidity may cause changes in the speed of sound of the gases. Thus, it may be desirable to measure humidity in the gases mixture to improve accuracy. These measurements can be used in calculations of the speed of sound in the gas as correction factors. To measure humidity, for example, a humidity sensor may be positioned at the intake manifold of the blower assembly 2 to measure the humidity of the air entering the gases delivery system 1. In some embodiments, the humidity sensor may be positioned at the outlet of the measurement apparatus 20, 40. In some embodiments, a humidity sensor can be placed both at the intake manifold of the blower assembly 2 and at the outlet of the measurement apparatus 20, 40. Use of two humidity sensors may provide the additional advantage of helping to determine the presence of a leak.
Pressure sensors may be located at the oxygen inlet 32 and at the air inlet 30 of the measurement apparatus 20, 40. As a result, the static or dynamic pressure of each of the input gases can be measured as they enter the measurement apparatus 20, 40. In some embodiments, the static or dynamic pressure of the air inlet 30 can be approximated by blower speed. This may give an approximation of the ratio of the input gases composition, or the relative fraction of input gases to one another. An additional pressure sensor may be located at the output of the measurement apparatus 20, 40 as the gases enter the humidification chamber 6. The measurement of pressure may provide a secondary gases concentration and a flow rate measurement system, which may be more independent of, or less sensitive to, effects of mixing, carbon dioxide, water vapour, temperature, or altitude changes. The temperature, humidity, and pressure sensors may provide measurement data to improve the accuracy in the measurement of oxygen concentration. This can be achieved through direct calculations or via a lookup table.
Acoustic meta-materials may be chosen to control, manipulate, and/or direct pressure waves to reduce dispersion that may lead to interference. Such materials may be used in conjunction with, or instead of, relying on the positioning of the ultrasonic sensors 26 with respect to an appropriate aperture diameter for a measurement section that is designed according to the chosen driving frequency.
In some embodiments, the measurement apparatus 20, 40 may be used with a humidification system that is not limited to a gases source comprising a blower but instead may be attached to a ventilator, insufflator, or other gases source. In some embodiments, the measurement apparatus 20, 40 may not be a part of the blower assembly 2 but may be a separate component of the gases delivery system 1 that is located between a gases source and a humidification system.
Measurement Methods
The measurement apparatus 20, 40 can be configured to provide electrical signals to a control system that are indicative of characteristics or properties of the gases in the gases delivery system 1. The control system can receive electrical signals, determine gases properties or characteristics (e.g., gases concentration, mixing ratios, flow rate, velocity, temperature, or humidity), and control devices or components of the gases delivery system 1 at least in part in response to the electrical signals.
The ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b can be operably coupled to a control system 720. The control system 720 can comprise a controller, data storage, communication buses, and the like to communicate with the sensors 710a, 710b, determine gases characteristics based at least in part on signals received from the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b, control components of the gases delivery system 1 in response to the determined characteristics, and the like. For example, the control system 720 can be configured to determine gases characteristics by comparing the time of flight (arrival time) of the pulses 712 in each direction (from each measurement phase). The control system 720 can determine the flow rate of the gases, for example, based at least in part on the differences in time of flight. The control system 720 can control a blower, a valve, or other similar component of the gases delivery system 1 in response to the determined characteristics.
In some embodiments, the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b are configured to transmit and receive the pulses 712 at a frequency that is at or near a natural operating frequency of the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b. The ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b can be configured to have the same natural operating frequency. This can advantageously reduce distortion from noise. In certain implementations, the natural frequency of the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b is about 25 kHz. In certain implementations, the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b can transmit and/or receive the pulses 712 about every 10 ms. The pulse train or pulses 712 can be a square wave, a sawtooth pattern, a sine wave, or some other shape of pulse. The control system 720 can be configured to identify or detect the frequency of the pulses 712 and/or the time of flight of the pulses 712. In certain implementations, the control system 720 can be configured to identify rising or falling edges, maxima or minima, and/or zero crossing points, etc., of the pulses 712. In certain implementations, sampling is done in each direction so that about 40 samples are acquired (e.g., 40 samples of rising edges and 40 samples of falling edges). In certain implementations, the sampling rate is set at about 50 Hz. In some embodiments, signals are not filtered.
With a fixed distance between the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b, the signal time of flight between the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b is affected by various characteristics or properties of the gases (e.g., oxygen levels, humidity, and temperature). At a particular temperature, the signal time of flight is expected to fall within a time range bound by the time of flight for air and for a pure oxygen environment. These time of flight boundaries are affected by factors such as gas flow, physical design of the measurement apparatus 20, 40, and assembly variations and may also be different in the downstream and upstream directions. This is illustrated in
To determine an oxygen concentration of a binary gases mixture of oxygen and air, the control system 720 can be configured to identify peaks in pulse trains received by the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b and calculate an average time of flight in each direction based on the number of peaks received and the times of each received peak. At a particular temperature, the oxygen concentration can be calculated as a volume percentage:
where Gd represents the downstream average time of flight for the binary gases mixture, Gu represents the upstream average time of flight for the binary gases mixture, and Gavg represents the average of Gd and Gu; Ad, Au, and Aavg represent the equivalent averages for air (which is 20.9% oxygen); and Od, Ou, and Oavg represent the equivalent averages for 100% oxygen. In the graph in
To determine the flow rate of a gases mixture comprising a particular oxygen concentration, the difference between the measured time of flight in each direction is adjusted by an offset referred to as a calibrated correction. The calibrated correction compensates at least in part for asymmetry in the measuring chamber 700. For example, even when the flow rate of gases is zero or near zero, there may be a difference in the time of flight for pulses moving in the downstream and upstream directions. As illustrated in
where k is a constant representing the influence of the cross sectional area of the measuring chamber 700 and the distance between the ultrasonic sensors 710a, 710b, fA is a calibrated correction for air, and fO is a calibrated correction for oxygen. The calibrated correction fG is a linear interpolation between fA and fO based on gas concentration.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and the like, are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense, that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to”.
Reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgement or any form of suggestion that that prior art forms part of the common general knowledge in the field of endeavour in any country in the world.
The apparatus and system of the present disclosure may also be said broadly to consist in the parts, elements and features referred to or indicated in the specification of the application, individually or collectively, in any or all combinations of two or more of said parts, elements or features.
Where, in the foregoing description reference has been made to integers or components having known equivalents thereof, those integers are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
It should be noted that various changes and modifications to the embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure and without diminishing its attendant advantages. For instance, various components may be repositioned as desired or various steps in a method may be performed in differing orders. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Moreover, not all of the features, aspects and advantages are necessarily required to practice the disclosed embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of claimed embodiments is intended to be defined only by the claims that follow and not by any individual embodiment in the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1269599 | Haber et al. | Jun 1918 | A |
1570781 | Ruben | Jun 1926 | A |
2283750 | Mikelson | May 1942 | A |
2568277 | Eltgroth | Sep 1951 | A |
2874564 | Martin et al. | Feb 1959 | A |
2984097 | Kniazuk et al. | May 1961 | A |
3120750 | Root, III | Feb 1964 | A |
3343403 | Romani et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3468157 | Burk et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3495628 | Boender | Feb 1970 | A |
3724484 | Turman | Apr 1973 | A |
3762197 | Roof et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3805590 | Ringwall et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3848457 | Behymer | Nov 1974 | A |
3863630 | Cavallo | Feb 1975 | A |
3926223 | Petzetakis | Dec 1975 | A |
3981176 | Jacobs | Sep 1976 | A |
4033808 | Petzetakis | Jul 1977 | A |
4155246 | Dempster et al. | May 1979 | A |
4215409 | Strowe | Jul 1980 | A |
4220040 | Noguchi et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4255964 | Morison | Mar 1981 | A |
4280183 | Santi | Jul 1981 | A |
4313436 | Schwanbom et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4326513 | Schulz et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4331025 | Ord, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
4340044 | Levy et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4345612 | Koni et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4380167 | Longini | Apr 1983 | A |
4452090 | Kou | Jun 1984 | A |
4520654 | Terhune | Jun 1985 | A |
4531551 | Eichelberger et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4555932 | Crosby, Jr. | Dec 1985 | A |
4662212 | Noguchi et al. | May 1987 | A |
4773448 | Francis | Sep 1988 | A |
4889116 | Taube | Dec 1989 | A |
4903736 | Baston et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4938066 | Dorr | Jul 1990 | A |
4989595 | De Vuono et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5060506 | Douglas | Oct 1991 | A |
5060507 | Urmson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060514 | Aylsworth | Oct 1991 | A |
5127442 | Blomqvist | Jul 1992 | A |
5179862 | Lynnworth | Jan 1993 | A |
5247826 | Frola et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5285677 | Oehler | Feb 1994 | A |
5313820 | Aylsworth | May 1994 | A |
5343760 | Sultan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351522 | Lura | Oct 1994 | A |
5359897 | Hamstead et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365922 | Raemer | Nov 1994 | A |
5392635 | Cadet et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5452621 | Aylesworth et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452714 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460175 | Foote et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463906 | Spani et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5490763 | Abrams et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503151 | Harnoncourt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5551419 | Froehlich et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581014 | Douglas | Dec 1996 | A |
5591292 | Blomqvist | Jan 1997 | A |
5625140 | Cadet et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627323 | Stern | May 1997 | A |
5640951 | Huddart et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5701883 | Hete et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5792665 | Morrow, III | Aug 1998 | A |
5809997 | Wolf | Sep 1998 | A |
5823186 | Rossen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5915834 | McCulloh | Jun 1999 | A |
5917135 | Michaels et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6039696 | Bell | Mar 2000 | A |
6041777 | Faithfull et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6105649 | Levingston et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123074 | Hete et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138674 | Gull et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142149 | Steen | Nov 2000 | A |
6178827 | Feller | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6279379 | Logue et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6397841 | Kenyon et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6450968 | Wallen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6487916 | Gomm et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537405 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543449 | Woodring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581595 | Murdock et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629934 | Mault et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6634356 | O'Dea et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6827084 | Grubb, Jr. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6910481 | Kimmel et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912907 | Fujimoto | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6954702 | Pierry et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7063668 | Cardelius et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066175 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7111624 | Thudor et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7183552 | Russell | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7263994 | Gradon et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7370651 | Holder | May 2008 | B2 |
7432508 | Daniels et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448376 | Lepel | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7501630 | Russell | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509957 | Duquette et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7606668 | Pierry et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7684931 | Pierry et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7810497 | Pittman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8042535 | Kenyon et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047082 | Bierl | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8100124 | Becker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8377180 | Maeda et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381722 | Berthon-Jones | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8485183 | Masic | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8561611 | Shissler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8616202 | Tatkov | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8746037 | Matsuzaki | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752544 | Bottom | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8875587 | Wiest et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9119933 | Bedford et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9149590 | Wallén | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168350 | Payton et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9285257 | Reutertiolt et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289569 | Cardelius et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9302066 | Bertinetti et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9463293 | Shelly et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9526807 | O'Donnell et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9610420 | Lithgow et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649459 | Taylor et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9844636 | McGroary et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9956370 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10357629 | Barker et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10722675 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10980967 | Barker et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11433210 | Van Schalkwyk et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11666720 | Burgess et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
20020062681 | Livingston | May 2002 | A1 |
20030065274 | Mault et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040211244 | Cardelius et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050121033 | Starr et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125170 | Gysling | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050223795 | Gerder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060042638 | Niklewski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060113690 | Huddart | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156828 | Konzelmann | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158956 | Laugharn et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060283450 | Shissler et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070044799 | Hete et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062531 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070125374 | Smith et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070245802 | Austerlitz | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070283958 | Naghavi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080041381 | Tham et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058667 | Pierry et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060647 | Messenger et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080072904 | Becker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092891 | Cewers | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080156328 | Taube | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090020120 | Schatzl et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090056715 | Cortez, Jr. et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090107501 | Krieger | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090145428 | Sward et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090178490 | Konzelmann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090223514 | Smith | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241953 | Vandine et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100006098 | McGinnis et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100126249 | Matsuzaki | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137729 | Pieny et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100218591 | Rhodes et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224191 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110088693 | Somervell | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110120462 | Tatkov | May 2011 | A1 |
20110209558 | Sugiura | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110314897 | Schellekens et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120006326 | Ahmad | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120055340 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065533 | Carillo, Jr. et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109536 | Pasveer | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125121 | Gottlieb et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120271188 | Van Kesteren | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130008438 | Sugawara | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130239960 | Bertinetti et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263854 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267863 | Orr | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140007878 | Armitstead et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034051 | Addington et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140137859 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140261414 | Weitzel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140311253 | Iwasa | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150048530 | Cheung | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150059745 | Barker | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150101600 | Miller et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150107587 | Zhang | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150136129 | Mahadevan et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150238722 | Al-Ali | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150283339 | Mahadevan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150327807 | Bronner et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160082220 | Barker et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160114121 | Holley et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160151601 | Cardelius et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160166790 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160228670 | Av-Gay et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160287139 | Luttrell | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287824 | Chang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160354573 | Buswell et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180236191 | Martin et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250481 | Salamitou et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190269874 | Barker et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20210322710 | Barker et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014202639 | Dec 2014 | AU |
1336536 | Feb 2002 | CN |
1455865 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1817378 | Aug 2006 | CN |
101318049 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101554510 | Oct 2009 | CN |
201379872 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101680859 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101861182 | Oct 2010 | CN |
102261937 | Nov 2011 | CN |
101252966 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102316920 | Sep 2015 | CN |
404809 | Oct 1924 | DE |
102004030747 | Jan 2006 | DE |
0896671 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0788805 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0813060 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1083427 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1138341 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1205747 | May 2002 | EP |
1286159 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1 477 798 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1961439 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2 017 586 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2154526 | Feb 2010 | EP |
1 620 683 | May 2010 | EP |
2 116 848 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2 501 426 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2200687 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2 496 163 | Aug 2016 | EP |
2 716 321 | Jan 2018 | EP |
2 512 335 | May 2018 | EP |
2833953 | Jan 2019 | EP |
3 019 227 | Jun 2019 | EP |
1 901 794 | Aug 2019 | EP |
191408838 | Oct 1914 | GB |
2087559 | May 1982 | GB |
55-004528 | Jan 1980 | JP |
S58-190439 | Dec 1983 | JP |
H01-321508 | Dec 1989 | JP |
10-073574 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2011-120661 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-214012 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-306603 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002-306603 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2008-518640 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2010-537779 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-521705 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2018-118085 | Aug 2018 | JP |
612813 | Apr 2015 | NZ |
WO 9528193 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 2000045883 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 02017991 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03090903 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004039444 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004069922 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112873 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 07002389 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007004898 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007069922 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007103855 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008149868 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009045198 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009052631 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009058081 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009145646 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010084183 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2011010191 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 11055286 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011058196 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 20110157196 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011075030 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 11086435 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2012021557 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2012089092 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 13050907 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013128365 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013137753 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013151447 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014059405 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2015038013 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015183107 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 17106636 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO 2017095241 | Jun 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050068, mailed Oct. 29, 2015, in 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Patent Application No. PCT/NZ2015/050068, mailed Dec. 8, 2016, in 9 pages. |
Markus Joos et al., “An ultrasonic sensor for the analysis of binary gas mixtures”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 16, Issues 1-3, Oct. 1993, pp. 413-419. |
H. Toda et al., “High-speed gas concentration measurement using ultrasound”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 144, Issue 1, May 28, 2008, pp. 1-6. |
J.C. Vyas et al., “A non-invasive ultrasonic gas sensor for binary gas mixtures”, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 115, Issue 1, May 23, 2006, pp. 28-32. |
Li Daohua, “Sensor Circuit Analysis and Design,” Wuhan University Press, Mar. 2000, pp. 203-209 w/explanation of relevance. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230026603 A1 | Jan 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62003423 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15313836 | US | |
Child | 17815882 | US |