Patent Application
20120093926
The study of Gürsoy A. and Cevik S., J.Microencapsulation, 2000, vol. 17, no. 5,565-575 is focussed on the properties of diclofenac sodium (DNa) alginate microspheres and tabletted DNa alginate microspheres using different polymers as additives. DNa alginate microspheres were prepared by the emulsification method and different polymers such as EUDRAGIT® NE 30 D, EUDRAGIT® RS 30 D or different kinds of celluloses, which were incorporated into the alginate gel to control the release rate of the drug.
US 2007/053698 discloses methods of sustained release administration of opioids, including but not limited to hydromorphone and oxycodone, that exhibit improved properties with respect to co-ingestion with aqueous alcohol. Ethanol resistant matrix tablet compositions may comprise hydromorphone or oxycodone as active ingredients and mixtures of substances like EUDRAGIT® RS, Lactose, Mg-stearate, stearyl alcohol, carnauba wax and the like.
US 2007/0104789 A1 describes gastro-resistant and ethanol-resistant controlled-release formulations comprising hydromorphone. The gastro-resistant and ethanol-resistant can be used in a matrix as well as the coating of the formulations. Alginic acid is mentioned among the examples for suitable gastro-resistant and -ethanol resistant substances. Pellet cores or granules may be prepared by anhydrous granulation, may be coated with the gastro-resistant and ethanol-resistant substances and then may be filled in capsules or bags or compressed into tablets under addition of dried pharmaceutical or nutraceutically acceptable auxiliary substances.
Pharmaceutical or nutraceutical compositions are designed to release the active ingredient in a manner of reproducible release curves. This shall result in desirable and reliable blood level profiles which shall provide an optimal therapeutic effect. If the blood level concentrations are too low, the active ingredient will not cause a sufficient therapeutic effect. If the blood level concentrations are too high, this may cause toxic effects. In both cases non optimal blood level concentrations of an active ingredient can be dangerous for the patient and shall therefore be avoided. A problem exists in that the ideal ratios assumed for the release of active ingredient during the design of a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition can be altered by the general living habits, thoughtlessness or by addictive behaviour of the patients with respect to the use of ethanol or ethanol-containing drinks. In these cases, the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical form which is actually designed for an exclusively aqueous medium is additionally exposed to an ethanol containing medium of greater or lesser strength. Since health authorities like for instance the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) focus more and more on the ethanol problem, ethanol resistance may be an important registration requirement in the near future.
Since not all patients are aware of the risk of simultaneous taking of a controlled release pharmaceutical or nutraceutical form and ethanol-containing drinks or do not follow or are not able to follow appropriate warnings, advice or recommendations, there is a demand for controlled release pharmaceutical or nutraceutical compositions, especially for gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical compositions, such that their mode of action is affected as little as possible by the presence of ethanol.
Conventional gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical compositions if coated or uncoated are usually not resistant to alcohol at all. Therefore one problem of the present invention was to provide gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical compositions which are resistant against the influence of ethanol.
Especially there is a problem for gastric resistant or enteric formulated compositions. These kinds of formulations are usually coated with a gastric resistant coating layer (enteric coating layer) onto the core which has the function that the release of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient in the stomach, respectively at pH 1.2 for 2 hours according to USP, shall not exceed 10%, preferably less than 5%. This function ensures that acid-sensitive pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredients are protected against inactivation and that pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredients which may be irritate the stomach mucosa are not set free in too high amounts. On the other hand in many cases the release of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient in the intestine, respectively at pH 6.8 for one hour or less according to the USP method, is designed to exceed at least 70, 75% or more. The presence of ethanol in concentrations of 5, 10, 20 or 40% (volume/volume) in the gastric fluid usually leads to an increase to the release rates in the stomach. Due to distribution effect the effect of ingested ethanol is in the intestine not of that importance as in the stomach. Thus an effective protection against the influence of ethanol should prevent such an undesired increase of pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient in the stomach in the first place. Furthermore it may be desired that protection against the influence of ethanol shall at least not influence the comparably fast release rates at pH 6.8 in media without ethanol.
a gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition, comprising a core, comprising a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient and a gastric resistant coating layer onto the core, wherein the release of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient is not more than 15, preferably not more than 10% under in-vitro conditions at pH 1.2 for 2 hours in medium according to USP with and without the addition of 40% (v/v) ethanol, wherein the gastric resistant coating layer comprises 10 to 100% by weight of one or more salts of alginic acid with a viscosity of 30 to 720 cP, preferably 40 to 450 cp, of a 1% aqueous solution.
The invention relates to a gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition, comprising a core, comprising a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient and a gastric resistant coating layer onto the core.
The core may comprise or may contain a neutral carrier pellet, for instance a sugar sphere or non-pareilles, on top of which the active ingredient is bound in a binder, such as lactose or polyvinylpyrrolidon. The core may alternatively comprise a pellet in the form of a polymeric matrix in which the active ingredient is bound. The core may comprise an uncoated pellet consisting of a crystallized active ingredient. The core may be as well a tablet, a mini tablet or a capsule.
The gastric resistant coating layer (enteric coating layer) onto the core has the function that the release of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient is not more than 15%, not more than 10%, not more than 8%, not more than 5% under in-vitro conditions at pH 1.2 for 2 hours in medium according to USP with and without the addition of 40% (v/v) ethanol. The USP (USP=United States Pharmacopoeia) which may be preferably used is USP32/NF27 (NF=National Formulary), apparatus II, paddle method, 50 rpm for tablets or paddle or basket method 50 to 100 rpm, depending on the monographie, for pellets.
The gastric resistant coating layer comprises at least one or more salts of alginic acid and may further comprise water-insoluble polymers and/or pharmaceutical or nutraceutically acceptable excipients as described herein.
The gastric resistant coating layer onto the core may preferably further have the function that the release of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient is not more than 15%, not more than 10%, not more than 8%, not more than 5% under in-vitro conditions at pH 1.2 for 2 hours in medium according to USP with and without the addition of 5, 10, 20 or 40% (v/v) ethanol.
The release of the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient may be at least 50, at least 70, preferably at least 75%, most preferably at least 80% under in-vitro conditions at pH 6.8 for one hour, preferably for 45 minutes, in a buffered medium according to USP without the addition of 40% (v/v) ethanol.
The polymer dry weight gain of the coating layer may be at least 2.5, at least 3.5, at least 4, preferably 4 to 30, preferably 4 to 20, more preferably 5 to 18, or most preferably 10 to 18 mg/cm2 surface area. This may correlate to 2-60% polymer dry weight gain related to the weight of the core. In the case of coated tablets the polymer dry weight gain related to the weight of the core (tablet core: around 1-25 or 1-10 mm in diameter or length) may be 2-30%. In the case of coated pellets the polymer dry weight gain related to the weight of the core (pellet core: 0.1 to 1.5 mm in diameter) may be 10-60%.
Very thin coatings with polymer weight gains of less than 4 mg/cm2 are possible but may be sometimes difficult to realize and to reproduce. Promissing results in this case may especially be achieved when potassium alginate is employed as the salt of alginic acid. However in general coatings of at least 4 mg/cm2 polymer weight gain are recommended by the inventors and can be easily achieved with all kinds of salts of alginic acid.
The gastric resistant coating layer may comprise, may comprise essentially or may contain 10 to 100, 20 to 100, 30 to 100, 40 to 100, 50 to 100, preferably 60 to 95, more preferred 70 to 90% by weight of one or more salts of alginic acid.
The salts of alginic acid may be selected from sodium alginate, potassium alginate, magnesium alginate, lithium alginate or ammonium alginate or mixtures thereof.
The salts of alginic acid may have a viscosity of 30 to 720, preferably 40 to 450, preferably 40 to 400 or preferably 50 to 300 centipoise (cp) of a 1% aqueous solution (weight/weight).
The methodology of determination of the viscosity of a polymer solution, for instance a solution of a salt of alginic acid, is well known to the skilled person. The viscosity is preferably determined according to European Pharmacopeia 7th edition, general chapter 2, methods of analysis, 2.2.8 and 2.2.10, page 27ff. The test is performed using a spindle viscometer.
The viscosity of a 1% alginate solution may be determined by adding 3 g product to 250 ml of distilled water in a beaker while stirring at 800 rpm using overhead stirrer. Then additional 47 ml water was added with rinsing the walls of the beaker. After stirring for 2 hours and getting a complete solution, the viscosity is measured using a LV model of the Brookfield viscometer at 25° C. (77° F.) at 60 rpm with no. 2 spindle for samples with a viscosity of more than 100 cP and at 60 rpm with no. 1 spindle for samples with viscosity less than 100 cP. Since the weight of water is almost exactly 1 g/ml even at 25° C. “weight/weight” is regarded as equal or identical to “weight/volume” in the sense of the invention. Theoretically possible marginal differences are regarded as insignificant.
The gastric resistant coating layer may comprise, essentially comprise or contain optionally 0 to 400, 0 to 300, 0 to 200, 0 to 100, 0 to 70, 0 to 50, preferably 5 to 80, 5 to 40 or most preferably 15 to 60 or 15 to 30% by weight of one or more water-insoluble polymers or one or more cellulosic polymers or mixtures thereof based on the weight of the one or more salts of alginic acid contained.
The one or more water-insoluble polymers or one or more cellulosic polymers may preferably contain not more than 12% by weight of monomer residues with ionic side groups, preferably not more than 12% by weight of monomer residues with cationic side groups.
The one or more water-insoluble polymers or one or more cellulosic polymers may preferably contain less than 5% by weight, preferably not more than 2% by weight, more preferably not more than 1 or 0.05 to 1% by weight, of monomer residues with anionic side groups.
Water-insoluble polymers in the sense of the invention are polymers which do not dissolve in water or are only swellable in water over of the whole range of pH 1-14. Water-insoluble polymers may be at the same time polymers containing not more than 12% of monomer residues with ionic side groups, like for instance EUDRAGIT® NE/NM or EUDRAGIT® RL/RS polymers.
Other kinds of water-insoluble polymers in the sense of the invention may be vinyl copolymers like polyvinylacetate, including derivates of polyvinylacetate. The polyvinylacetate may be present in the form of a dispersion. One example is the type Kollicoat® SR 30 D (BASF), polyvinylacetate dispersion, stabilized with povidone and Na-laurylsulfate.
The water-insoluble polymers may preferably belong to the group of (meth)acrylate copolymers.
The gastric resistant coating layer may comprise a water-insoluble copolymer which is a copolymer composed of free-radical polymerized units of more than 95% by weight, in particular to an extent of at least 98% by weight, preferably to an extent of at least 99% by weight, in particular to an extent of at least 99% by weight, more preferably to an extent of 100% by weight, of (meth)acrylate monomers with neutral radicals, especially C1- to C4-alkyl radicals. These kinds of polymers do not dissolve in water or are only swellable in water over of the whole range of pH 1-14.
Suitable (meth)acrylate monomers with neutral radicals are, for example, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate. Preference is given to methyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate and methyl acrylate.
Methacrylate monomers with anionic radicals, for example acrylic acid and/or methacrylic acid, may be present in small amounts of less than 5% by weight, preferably not more than 2% by weight, more preferably not more than 1 or 0.05 to 1% by weight.
Suitable examples are neutral or virtually neutral (meth)acrylate copolymers composed of 20 to 40% by weight of ethyl acrylate, 60 to 80% by weight of methyl methacrylate and 0 to less than 5% by weight, preferably 0 to 2 or 0.05 to 1% by weight of methacrylic acid or any methacrylic acid (EUDRAGIT® NE 30D or EUDRAGIT® NM 30D type).
EUDRAGIT® NE 30D and Eudragit® NM 30D are dispersions containing 30% by weight of copolymers composed of free-radically polymerized units of 30% by weight of ethyl acrylate and 70% by weight of methyl methacrylate.
Preference is given to neutral or essentially neutral methyl acrylate copolymers which, according to WO 01/68767, have been prepared as dispersions using 1-10% by weight of a nonionic emulsifier having an HLB value of 15.2 to 17.3. The latter offer the advantage that there is no phase separation with formation of crystal structures by the emulsifier (Eudragit® NM 30D type).
According to EP 1 571 164 A2, corresponding, virtually neutral (meth)acrylate copolymers with small proportions of 0.05 to 1% by weight of monoolefinically unsaturated C3-C8-carboxylic acids can, however, also be prepared by emulsion polymerization in the presence of comparatively small amounts of anionic emulsifiers, for example 0.001 to 1% by weight.
The gastric resistant coating layer may comprise a water-insoluble copolymer which is a copolymer composed of free-radical polymerized units of 85 to 98% by weight of free-radical polymerized C1 to C4 alkyl esters of acrylic or methacrylic acid and 15 to 2% by weight of (meth)acrylate monomers with a quaternary amino group in the alkyl radical. These kinds of polymers do not dissolve in water or are only swellable in water over of the whole range of pH 1-14.
Suitable polymers may also belong to the group of cellulosic polymers, preferably to the group of water soluble celluloses. The cellulosic polymer is preferably a water-soluble cellulose. A suitable cellulosic polymer is hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC).
The invention is preferably useful for nutraceutical dosage forms.
Nutraceuticals can be defined as extracts of foods claimed to have medical effects on human health. The nutraceutical is usual contained in a medical format such as capsule, tablet or powder in a prescribed dose. Examples for nutraceuticals are resveratrol from grape products as an antioxidant, soluble dietary fiber products, such as psyllium seed husk for reducing hypercholesterolemia, broccoli (sulphane) as a cancer preservative, and soy or clover (isoflavonoids) to improve arterial health. Other nutraceuticals examples are flvonoids, antioxidants, alpha-linoleic acid from flax seed, beta-carotene from marigold petals or antocyanins from berries. Sometimes the expression neutraceuticals is used as synonym for nutraceuticals. The gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition is comprising a core, comprising a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient. The pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient may be a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient which may be inactivated under the influence of gastric fluids at pH 1.2 or a pharmaceutical or nutraceutical active ingredient which may irritate the stomach mucosa when set free in the stomach.
The invention is also preferably useful for enteric coated pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Therapeutical and chemical classes of drugs used in enteric coated pharmaceutical dosage forms are for instance analgetics, antibiotics or anti-infectives, antibodies, antiepileptics, antigens from plants, antirheumatics, betablocker, benzimidazole derivatives, beta-blocker, cardiovascular drugs, chemotherapeuitcs, CNS drugs, digitalis glycosides, gastrointestinal drugs, e.g. proton pum inhibitors, enzymes, hormons, liquid or solid natural extracts, oligonucleotides, peptidhormon proteins, therapeutical bacteria, peptides, proteins, proton pump inhibitors, (metal) salt f.e. aspartates, chlorides, orthates, urology drugs, vaccines
Examples of drugs, which are acid-lablile, irritating or need controlled release, may be: Acamprosat, aescin, amylase, acetylsalicylic acid, adrenalin, 5-amino salicylic acid, aureomycin, bacitracin, balsalazine, beta carotene, bicalutamid bisacodyl, bromelain, bromelain, budesonide, calcitonin, carbamacipine, carboplatin, cephalosporins, cetrorelix, clarithromycin, chloromycetin, cimetidine, cisapride, cladribine, clorazepate, cromalyn, 1-deaminocysteine-8-D-arginine-vasopressin, deramciclane, detirelix, dexlansoprazole, diclofenac, didanosine, digitoxin and other digitalis glycosides, dihydrostreptomycin, dimethicone, divalproex, drospirenone, duloxetine, enzymes, erythromycin, esomeprazole, estrogens, etoposide, famotidine, fluorides, garlic oil, glucagon, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), heparin, hydrocortisone, human growth hormon (hGH), ibuprofen, ilaprazole, insulin, Interferon, Interleukin, Intron A, ketoprofen, lansoprazole, leuprolidacetat lipase, lipoic acid, lithium, kinin, memantine, mesalazine, methenamine, milameline, minerals, minoprazole, naproxen, natamycin, nitrofurantion, novobiocin, olsalazine, omeprazole, orothates, pancreatin, pantoprazole, parathyroidhormone, paroxetine, penicillin, perprazol, pindolol, polymyxin, potassium, pravastatin, prednisone, preglumetacin progabide, pro-somatostatin, protease, quinapril, rabeprazole, ranitidine, ranolazine, reboxetine, rutosid, somatostatin streptomycin, subtilin, sulfasalazine, sulphanilamide, tamsulosin, tenatoprazole, thrypsine, valproic acid, vasopressin, vitamins, zinc, including their salts, derivatives, polymorphs, isomorphs, or any kinds of mixtures or combinations thereof.
The gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition may be a coated tablet, a coated minitablet, a coated pellet, a coated granule, a sachet, a capsule, filled with coated pellets or with powder or with granules, or a coated capsule, filled with coated pellets or with powder or with granules.
The term coated tablet includes pellet-containing tablets or compressed tablets and is well known to a skilled person. Such a tablet may have a size of around 5 to 25 mm for instance. Usually, defined pluralities of small active ingredient containing pellets are compressed therein together with binding excipients to give the well known tablet form. After oral ingestion and contact with the body fluid the tablet form is disrupted and the pellets are set free. The compressed tablet combines the advantage of the single dose form for ingestion with the advantages of a multiple forms, for instance the dosage accuracy.
The term coated minitablet is well known to the skilled person. A minitablet is smaller than the traditional tablet and may have a size of around 1 to 4 mm. The minitablet is, like a pellet, a single dosage form to be used in multiple dosages. In comparison to pellets, which may be in the same size, minitablets usually have the advantage of having more regular surfaces which can be coated more accurately and more uniformly. Minitablets may be provided enclosed in capsules, such as gelatine capsules. Such capsules disrupt after oral ingestion and contact with the gastric or intestinal fluids and the minitablets are set free. Another application of minitablets is the individual fine adjustment of the active ingredient dosage. In this case the patient may ingest a defined number of minitablets directly which matches to the severe of the decease to cure but also to his individual body weight. A minitablet is different from pellet-containing compressed tablet as discussed above.
The term sachet is well known to the skilled person. It refers to small sealed package which contains the active ingredient often in pellet containing liquid form or also in dry pellet or powder form. The sachet itself is only the package form is not intended to be ingested. The content of the sachet may be dissolved in water or as an advantageous feature may be soaked or ingested directly without further liquid. The latter is advantageous feature for the patient when the dosage form shall be ingested in a situation where no water is available. The sachet is an alternative dosage form to tablets, minitablets or capsules.
Coated pellets may be filled in a capsule, for instance gelatine or HPMC capsule. A capsule containing pellets may also be coated with the enteric coating layer according to the invention.
The gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition is preferably present in the form of an aqueous coating solution, suspension or dispersion. The dry weight content of the solution, suspension or dispersion may be in the range of 10 to 50, preferably 15 to 35%.
A gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition may optionally comprise in the gastric resistant coating layer up to 90, up to 80, up to 70, up to 60, up to 50, up to 40, up to 30, up to 20, or up to 10% by weight of pharmaceutical or nutraceutically acceptable excipients. The pharmaceutical or nutraceutically acceptable excipients are different from salts of alginic acid and different from the water-insoluble polymers or the cellulosic polymers mentioned above and may be selected from the group of antioxidants, brighteners, binding agents, flavouring agents, flow aids, fragrances, glidants, penetration-promoting agents, polymers (different from salts of alginic acid and different from the water-insoluble polymers or the cellulosic polymers mentioned above; excipient polymers can be for instance disintegrants like crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone), pigments, plasticizers, pore-forming agents or stabilizers or combinations thereof.
The invention further relates to a process for producing the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical form according of the invention by forming the core comprising the active ingredient by direct compression, compression of dry, wet or sintered granules, extrusion and subsequent rounding off, wet or dry granulation or direct pelleting or by binding powders (powder layering) onto active ingredient-free beads or neutral cores (nonpareilles) or active ingredient-containing particles and by applying the polymer coating in the form of an aqueous dispersion in a spray process or by fluidized bed spray granulation onto the core.
The gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition according to the invention may be further coated with a sub coat or a top coat or both.
A sub coat may be located between the core and the gastric resistant (enteric) coating layer. A sub coat may have the function to separate substances of the core from substances of the controlling layer which may be incompatible with each other. The sub coat has essentially no influence on the active ingredient release characteristics. A subcoat is preferably essentially water-soluble, for instance it may consist of substances like hydroxypropylmethyl-cellulose (HPMC) as a film former. The average thickness of the subcoat layer is very thin, for example not more than 15 μm, preferably not more than 10 μm.
A top coat is also preferably essentially water soluble. A top coat may have the function of colouring the pharmaceutical or nutraceutical form or protecting from environmental influences for instance from moisture during storage. The top coat may consist out of a binder, for instance a water soluble polymer like a polysaccharide or HPMC, or a sugar compound like saccharose. The top coat may further contain pharmaceutical or nutraceutical excipients like pigments or glidants in high amounts. The topcoat has essentially no influence on the release characteristics.
The expressions sub coat and top coat are well known to the person skilled in the art.
As a rough estimation coated pellets may have a size in the range of 50 to 1000 μm (average diameter), while coated tablets may have a size in the range of above 1000 μm up to 25 mm (diameter or length). As a rule one can say the smaller the size of the pellet cores are, the higher the pellet coating weight gain needed. This is due to the comparably higher surface area of pellets compared to tablets.
In coatings for pellets also comparably high amounts of excipients, preferably talcum, may be used in contrast to coating for tablet. Amounts of more than 50 and up to 250% by weight in relation to the amount of the salt of alginic acid may be used which may correspond to more than 50 and up to 90% by weight of the coating layer.
In tablets coatings comparably low amounts of excipients, preferably talcum but also other excipients, may be used in contrast to pellets. Amounts of more 50 to 100% by weight in relation to the amount of the salt of alginic acid may be used which may correspond up to 50% by weight of the coating layer.
One further embodiment of the present invention is the use of ammonium alginate as a substitute for or incombination with sodium alginate in situtations were considerable amounts calcium ions are present in the food ingested together with the inventive gastric resistant pharmaceutical or nutraceutical composition. This can happen when diary products such like milk or yoghurt are consumed. Surprisingly it has been found that the presence of calcium ion in USP buffer pH 6.8 has almost no influence on the release rate of coatings in which ammonium alginate is used as the alginate salt. However the release rate at pH 6.8 of coatings in which sodium alginate is used as the alginate salt drops down almost totally (s. examples 32-37).
Coating suspensions are applied by spray coating processes following known processes. As a rule the coated compositions are cured at elevated temperatures for example 24 hours at 40° C. or 60° C. after the spray coating in order to provide reproducible and stable functionality. Surprisingly it was found that pure aliginate coatings do not need any curing to reach reproducible and stable functionality. Therefore pure alginate coatings in the examples were not cured. However when aliginate is mixed with one or more water-insoluble polymers or one or more cellulosic polymers the coated formulations had to be cured after the spraying process.
More than One Gastric Resistant Coating Layer (Double or Multilayer Coatings)
In certain embodiments it may be useful to have two or more different gastric resistant coatings layers. In example 40 a pellet coating shows an inner coating layer with a high content of talc and a disintegrant. The outer coating has a high content of talc but no disintegrant. In this case the inner coating accelerates the drug release in pH 6.8 buffer without affecting the enteric properties at pH 1.2. The outer coating alone would not show these combination of properties.
All excipients meet pharmacopoeial or equivalent specifications.
Coating pan 12″ with 3 baffles: Rotation 16-23 rpm
Silicone tube: 3.0 mm inner diameter
Spray rate: 1.5 gm/min−3 gm/min
Spray air pressure: 1 bar
Inlet air temperature: 50° C.
Product temperature: 30° C.-35° C.
Instrument used: GPCG 3.1
Silicone tube: 3.0 mm inner diameter
Column height: 10-15 mm
Nozzle bore: 0.8 bar
Filter shaking: 10 sec
Filter shaking pause: 120 sec
Air flow mode: Auto
Air flow: 150 m3/h
Atomisation pressure: 1.2-1.5 bar
Inlet temperature: 60-65° C.
Product temperature: 50° C.-55° C.
Spray rate: 3-5 g/min
Time: 120 minutes
Dissolution Medium: Buffer stage medium pH 6.8
Time Points: 60 minutes (30, 45, 60 minutes)
Accurately weigh and transfer 19.01 g of Trisodium Phosphate and 6.37 mL of conc. hydrochloric acid to 1000 mL water. Dissolve and make up the volume to one litre and mix well. Adjust pH to 6.8±0.05 using 2N NaOH or 2N HCl.
Column: Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB C8 column, 150×4.6 mm, 5 μm or equivalent
Flow rate: 1 mL/minute
Run time: 5 minutes
Standard stock preparation—Weigh accurately and transfer about 50 mg of Caffeine standard into a 100 mL volumetric flask. Dissolve and make up the volume with water. Acid Stage standard: Dilute 5 mL of stock solution to 50 mL with 0.1N HCl. Buffer Stage standard: Dilute 5 mL of stock solution to 50 mL with buffer stage medium.
Acid Stage: Weigh and transfer tablet of caffeine in six different dissolution jars and then perform the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above (Acid Stage). After 2 hr remove 10 mL of aliquot and analyse as acid stage sample solution.
Buffer Stage: Transfer tablet to buffer stage medium pH 6.8. Continue the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above (Buffer Stage). Filter the aliquots of each interval through 0.45 μm nylon membrane syringe filter discarding first few mL of the filtrate. Analyse buffer stage sample solution.
Apparatus: Disintegration tester
Dissolution Medium: SGF with pepsin, USP/NF
Time: 60 minutes
Apparatus: Disintegration tester
Dissolution Medium: SIF with pancreatin, USP/NF
Volume of Medium: 900 ml
Temperature: 37° C.±0.5° C.
Time: 60 minutes
Preparation of Simulated Gastric Fluid (SGF) with Pepsin, USP/NF
Accurately weigh and transfer 2.0 g of Sodium Chloride and 2.67 g of purified pepsin (that is derived from porcine stomach mucosa, with an activity of 3000 units per mg of protein) to 500 mL water. Dissolve the salts and to this add 7.0 mL of Hydrochloric acid and make up the volume to 1000 mL with water. This test solution has a pH of about 1.2.
Preparation of Simulated Intestinal Fluid (SIF) with Pancreatin, USP/NF:
Accurately weigh and transfer 6.8 g of monobasic potassium phosphate and 0.61 g of Sodium hydroxide and dissolve in 500 mL of water. To this add 10 g pancreatin, mix and adjust the resulting solution with either 0.2N sodium hydroxide or 0.2N hydrochloric acid to a pH of 6.8±0.1. Dilute with water to 1000 mL.
Dissolution Medium: 5%, 10%, 20% and 40% alcohol (ethanol) in 0.1N HCl.
Time: 2 hours
Method of Detection-HPLC: same as given for dissolution.
Standard stock preparation—Weigh accurately and transfer about 50 mg of Caffeine standard into a 100 mL volumetric flask. Dissolve and make up the volume with water. Alcohol standard: Dilute 5 mL of stock solution to 50 mL with respective alcoholic medium.
Weigh and transfer tablet of caffeine in six different dissolution jars and then perform the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above (Alcohol). After 2 hr remove 10 mL of aliquot and analyse as alcohol sample solution. Filter the aliquots with 0.45 μm nylon membrane syringe filter discarding first few mL of the filtrate. Analyse alcohol sample solution.
Time: 60 minutes
Dissolution Medium: Buffer stage medium pH 6.8 (Refer note below)
Time Points: 75 minutes (30, 45, 60, 75 minutes)
Detection Wavelength: Difference between absorbance at 286 nm and 650 nm
Buffer stage medium is a mixture of acid stage medium (475 mL) and phosphate buffer concentrate (425 mL) with pH adjusted to 6.8.
Preparation of Phosphate buffer Concentrate—
Accurately weigh 16.3 g of monobasic sodium Phosphate, 7.05 g of sodium hydroxide, 3.0 g of Sodium dodecyl sulfate and dissolve it water and make up the volume till one liter and mix well.
Acid Stage: Weigh and transfer pellets of lansoprazole (equivalent to 30 mg) in six different dissolution jars and then perform the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above (Acid Stage). After 1 hr remove 25 mL of aliquot and analyse as acid stage sample solution.
Buffer Stage: Add 425 mL of Phosphate buffer concentrate to the acid stage medium (Buffer Stage—This will provide total of 900 mL pH 6.8 medium). Continue the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above. Filter the aliquots of each interval through 0.45 μm nylon membrane syringe filter discarding first few mL of the filtrate. Analyse buffer stage sample solution.
Analytical method for tablets has been used for Caffeine pellets
Coating of 8 mg/cm2 polymer plain sodium alginate
Formula for polymer coating suspension on 300 g tablets.
Procedure for coating suspension preparation:
Coating continued up to 8 mg/cm2 polymer
Suspension applied: 639.8 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 g/cm2)
Coating continued up to 32 mg/cm2 polymer, Suspension applied: 956.76 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 6 mg/cm2 polymer plain sodium alginate
Sodium Alginate was weighed and kept under stirring with water for 30 minutes on an overhead stirrer to prepare 5% solution.
Talc and colour were homogenized with remaining amount of water for 30 minutes.
Homogenized talc suspension was added to Alginate solution of step 2 and stirring was continued for further 30 mins.
The final prepared suspension was passed through a sieve of 300 microns (60#).
This suspension was further sprayed onto tablets in a coating pan.
Coating done up to 6 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 564.5 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (HPMC 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Sodium Alginate was weighed and kept under stirring with water for 2 hours on an overhead stirrer to prepare 5% solution.
Weighed quantity of HPMC was added to 135 g of water and stirrered for 60 minutes using an overhead stirrer.
PEG 6000 was dissolved in 15 g of hot water (70-75° C.) and added to step 2
Talc and colour were homogenized with remaining amount of water for 30 minutes.
Suspension of step 2 was added to solution of step 1
Homogenized talc suspension was added to Alginate solution and stirring was continued for further 30 mins.
The final prepared suspension was passed through a sieve of 300 microns (60#).
This suspension was further sprayed onto tablets in a coating pan.
Coating done upto 16 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1223 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 2.7 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 13.3 mg/cm2)
Coating done up to 16 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1151.94 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 3.2 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12.8 mg/cm2
Coating done upto 16 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1187.55 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Results:
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Suspension applied: 1196 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NE 30 D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Suspension applied: 1196 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (Kollicoat® SR 30 D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Coating done upto 16 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1470 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® RS 30 D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Coating done up to 16 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1470 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
EUDRAGIT® NM 30D: MANUCOL® DH: 1:3 coating
Coating done up to 50% polymer level
Suspension applied: 6750 g
Curing parameter: Fluidisation for 2 hours at 50° C.
Enteric resistance followed by 89% drug release was observed in 60 minutes in USP pH 5.5 buffer with 50% polymer coating level
Coating of 4 mg/cm2 polymer plain alginate
Suspension applied for 3 mg/cm2 coating level: 300 g
Suspension applied for 4 mg/cm2 coating level: 400 g
Coating of 6 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 2 mg/cm2)
Sodium Alginate was weighed and kept under stirring with water for 1 hour on an overhead stirrer to prepare 10% solution.
Talc and colour were homogenized with remaining amount of water for 30 minutes.
Homogenized talc suspension and EUDRAGIT® NM 30D were added to Alginate solution and stirring was continued for further 30 mins.
The final prepared suspension was passed through a sieve of 300 microns (60#).
This suspension was further sprayed onto tablets in a coating pan
Suspension applied: 239.6 g
Curing: 24 h at 60° C. in a tray dryer
Tablet was intact after disintegration test in SGF and swelling was observed within 60 minutes in SIF
Coating of 2 mg/cm2 Potassium Alginate
Suspension applied for 2 mg/cm2: 199.22 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 4 mg/cm2 polymer pure sodium alginate
Suspension applied: 319.8 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Suspension applied: 1196 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 4 mg/cm2 polymer plain sodium alginate)
Coating done up to 4 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 399.75 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 3 mg/cm2 polymer plain sodium alginate)
Coating done up to 3 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 300 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 12 mg/cm2)
Suspension applied: 1196 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 3 mg/cm2 and 4 mg/cm2 Potassium Alginate
Suspension applied for 3 mg/cm2: 677.4 g
Suspension applied for 4 mg/cm2: 903.2 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 7 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 1.75 mg/cm2+potassium alginate 5.25 mg/cm2)
Coating done up to 7 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1047.21 g
Curing parameter: 60° C. for 24 hours in tray dryer
Coating of 6 mg/cm2 plain sodium alginate
Coating done up to 6 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1199.25 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 8 mg/cm2 polymer pure sodium alginate
Coating done up to 8 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 1599 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 12 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 3 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 9 mg/cm2)
Suspension applied: 1794.38 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Coating of 10 mg/cm2 Carrageenan
Suspension applied: 2258 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 4 mg/cm2 plain alginic acid
Coating of 16 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+alginic acid 12 mg/cm2)
Suspension sprayed: 796 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Coating of 5 mg/cm2EUDRAGIT® L 30 D-55 dry polymer
Coating done up to 5 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 142.1 g
Curing parameter: No curing
Enteric resistance followed by slow drug release was observed in USP pH 5.5 buffer with 5 mg/cm2 coating level with only 46%, 59% and 66% drug release observed in 30, 45 and 60 minutes respectively.
Coating of 5 mg/cm2EUDRAGIT® NM 30D dry polymer
Coating done up to 4 mg/cm2 coating level
Suspension applied: 106.5 g
Curing parameter: 24 hrs at 60° C. in a tray dryer.
Procedure:
pH of final suspension: 7.15
Quantity Required for 300 gm Tablets
For 5 mg/cm2 coating 663.47 suspension
Coating Pan: 12 inch
Silicone tube (od/id): 5/3 mm
Spray air pressure: 1.2 bar
Initial weight of 20 tabs: 8.04 gm
Required weight gain: 8.57 gm
Final weight gain: 8.57 gm
Pan rpm range: 22
Pump rpm range: 2
Spray rate range: 3.31 gm/min/2 RPM
Curing: 60° C. for 24 hr.
The process was smooth without any technical problems
Procedure:
pH of final suspension: 7.18
Quantity Required for 300 gm Tablets
For 7 mg/cm2 coating 694.95 gm suspension
Coating Pan: 12 inch
Silicone tube (od/id): 5/3 mm
Spray air pressure: 1.0 bar
Initial weight of 20 tabs: 8.0 gm
Required weight gain: 8.57 gm
Final Weight Gain: 8.56 gm
Pan rpm range: 20
Pump rpm range: 2-3
Spray rate range: 3.42 gm/min/2 RPM-5.04 gm/min/3 RPM
Curing: 60° C. for 24 hr.
The process was smooth without any technical problems
1) Acid stage medium: (0.1N HCl)
For 1 L add 85 mL of concentrated hydrochloride in 900 mL of distilled water. Make up the volume till one litre and mix well.
2) Buffer stage medium: (Plain pH 6.8)
Accurately weigh and transfer 19.01 g of Trisodium Phosphate and 6.37 mL of conc. hydrochloric acid to 990 mL water. Dissolve and make up the volume till one litre and mix well. Adjust pH to 6.8±0.05 using 2N NaOH or 2N HCl.
3) Acid stage medium: (0.1N HCl with Ca++ ions)
For 1 L add 85 mL of concentrated hydrochloride in 900 mL of distilled water. Add 0.185 g of CaCl2.2H2O make up the volume till one litre and mix well.
4) Buffer stage medium: (Buffer pH 6.8 with Ca++ ions)
Accurately weigh and transfer 19.01 g of Trisodium Phosphate and 6.37 mL of conc. hydrochloric acid to 1000 mL water. Add 0.185 g of CaCl2.2H2O and dissolve and make up the volume till one litre and mix well. Adjust pH to 6.8±0.05 using 2N NaOH or 2N HCl.
Acid Stage: Weigh and transfer tablet of caffeine in six different dissolution jars and then perform the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above (Acid Stage). After 2 hr remove 10 mL of aliquot and analyse as acid stage sample solution.
Buffer Stage: Transfer tablet to buffer stage medium pH 6.8. Continue the dissolution test as per parameters given in the method above (Buffer Stage). Filter the aliquots of each interval through 0.45 μm nylon membrane syringe filter discarding first few mL of the filtrate. Analyse buffer stage sample solution.
Studies were done as follows:
1) Dissolution in 0.1 N followed by pH 6.8 buffer (plain)
2) Dissolution in 1 mM Ca++ in HCl followed by 1 mM Ca++ in pH 6.8 buffer
3) Addition of 1 mM Ca++ in HCl followed by pH 6.8 buffer (without Calcium)
Result: The Sodium alginate coating is sensitive to the presence of calcium in pH 6.8 buffer, while the ammonium alginate coating is not.
Result: The Sodium alginate+EUDRAGIT® NM coating is sensitive to the presence of calcium in pH 6.8 buffer, while the ammonium alginate+EUDRAGIT® NM coating is not.
EUDRAGIT® NM 30D: Potassium Alginate: 1:3 coating
Coating done up to 25% polymer level
Curing 24 hours at 60° C. in tray dryer
Coating of 5.2 mg/cm2 polymer (EUDRAGIT® NM 30D 4 mg/cm2+sodium alginate 1.2 mg/cm2)
Sodium Alginate was weighed and kept under stirring with water for 1 hour on an overhead stirrer to prepare 10% solution.
Talc and colour were homogenized with remaining amount of water for 30 minutes. Homogenized talc suspension and EUDRAGIT® NM 30D were added to Alginate solution and stirring was continued for further 30 mins.
The final prepared suspension was passed through a sieve of 300 microns (60#).
This suspension was further sprayed onto tablets in a coating pan
Suspension applied: 284.08 g
Resistance to alcohol dose dumping was observed with 5.2 mg/cm2 polymer coating level at 5%, 10%, 20% and 40% alcohol levels.
Pellet size: 1 mm−1.4 mm
Coating of 25% Potassium alginate
Coating done up to 25% polymer level
Suspension applied: 10468.75 g
Coating of 10% Potassium alginate
Coating done up to 10% polymer level
Suspension applied: 3750 g
Total coating done: 25% inner coat+10% outer coat=35% total coating
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2378/CHE/2010 | Aug 2010 | IN | national |
