The present invention relates generally to treatment of metabolic conditions, and specifically to invasive techniques and apparatus for treating metabolic and behavioral conditions.
Invasive treatments for obesity are often recommended for patients with a body mass index (mass/height2 [kg/m2]) which is greater than 35 or 40. For such patients, their weight is commonly associated with increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, and arthritis. Preferably, the invasive treatments are accompanied by changes in lifestyle, such as improved eating habits and an appropriate exercise regimen.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/734,358 to Flesler et al., which published as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/0161414, and which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and is incorporated herein by reference, describes apparatus for treating a condition such as obesity. The apparatus includes a set of one or more electrodes, which are adapted to be applied to one or more respective sites in a vicinity of a body of a stomach of a patient. A control unit is adapted to drive the electrode set to apply to the body of the stomach a signal, configured such that application thereof increases a level of contraction of muscle tissue of the body of the stomach, and decreases a cross-sectional area of a portion of the body of the stomach for a substantially continuous period greater than about 3 seconds.
PCT Publication WO 02/082968 to Policker et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and is incorporated herein by reference, describes a diet evaluation gastric apparatus, which detects when a patient swallows, and detects the type and amount of matter ingested. The apparatus includes electrodes adapted to be coupled to the fundus and antrum of the patient and to measure electrical and mechanical activity therein, and a control unit to analyze such electrical and mechanical activity and optionally apply electrical energy to modify the activity of tissue of the patient.
PCT Publication WO 02/053093 to Policker et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and is incorporated herein by reference, describes a method for treating a subject, including receiving a sensor signal responsive to the subject eating, analyzing the sensor signal, and driving a current into tissue of the subject responsive to analyzing the signal. The current is typically driven into muscle tissue of the subject's stomach. Typically, receiving the sensor signal includes sensing electrical potential change generated responsive to contraction of a muscle such as a stomach muscle of the subject.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,690,691 to Chen et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gastric pacemaker for treating obesity and other conditions. The pacemaker includes multiple electrodes which are placed at various positions on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and which deliver phased electrical stimulation to pace peristaltic movement of material through the GI tract.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,243,607 to Mintchev et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gastrointestinal electrical pacemaker, including multiple electrodes which are arranged around a portion of the GI tract. The electrodes stimulate smooth muscle so that local contractions of the portion of the GI tract are artificially propagated therethrough, in order to facilitate a partial emptying of the portion. Preferably, the local contractions are artificially propagated by phase locking or time shifting the electrical stimulus, which is applied to the smooth muscle circumferentially about the portion at two or more locations.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,423,872 to Cigaina, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes apparatus for applying electrical pulses to the distal gastric antrum of a patient, so as to reduce the motility of the stomach and to thereby treat obesity or another condition.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,988 to Wernicke et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes techniques for treating and controlling diabetes and other systemic pancreatic endocrine disorders attributable to abnormal levels of secretion of endogenous insulin. An electrical stimulator implanted into or worn external to the patient's body is adapted, when activated, to generate a programmable electrical waveform for application to electrodes implanted on the vagus nerve of the patient. The electrical waveform is programmed using parameter values selected to stimulate or inhibit the vagus nerve to modulate the electrical activity thereof to increase or decrease secretion of natural insulin by the patient's pancreas. The stimulator is selectively activated manually by the patient in response to direct measurement of blood glucose or symptoms, or is activated automatically by programming the activation to occur at predetermined times and for predetermined intervals during the circadian cycle of the patient. Alternatively, the automatic activation is achieved using an implanted sensor to detect the blood glucose concentration, and is triggered when the patient's blood glucose concentration exceeds or falls below a predetermined level depending on whether diabetes or hypoglycemia is being treated.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,188,104 and 5,263,480 to Wemicke et al., which are incorporated herein by reference, describe a method for stimulating the vagus nerve of a patient so as to alleviate an eating disorder.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,104,955, 6,091,992, and 5,836,994 to Bourgeois, U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,326 to Bardy, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,411,507 to Wingrove, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe the application of electrical signals to the GI tract to treat various physiological disorders.
PCT Patent Publication WO 99/03533 to Ben-Haim et al., entitled, “Smooth muscle controller,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/481,253 in the national phase thereof, both of which are assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and are incorporated herein by reference, describe apparatus and methods for applying signals to smooth muscle so as to modify the behavior thereof. In particular, apparatus for controlling the stomach is described in which a controller applies an electrical field to electrodes on the stomach wall so as to modify the reaction of muscle tissue therein to an activation signal, while not generating a propagating action potential in the tissue. In the context of the present patent application and in the claims, the use of such a non-excitatory signal to modify the response of one or more cells to electrical activation thereof, without inducing action potentials in the cells, is referred to as Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC). Use of an ETC signal is described with respect to treating obesity, by applying the ETC signal to the stomach so as to delay or prevent emptying of the stomach. In addition, a method is described for increasing the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, by applying an ETC signal to a portion of the tract in order to increase the contraction force generated in the portion.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,317,631 to Ben-Haim et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and is incorporated herein by reference, describes methods for modifying the force of contraction of a heart chamber by applying an ETC signal to the heart.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,385 to Mittal et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a crural diaphragm pacemaker for treating gastroesophageal reflux. The pacemaker includes one or more electrodes which are placed in contact with the crural diaphragm, either by implantation or by connecting the electrodes to the skeletal muscles of the crural diaphragm through the skin. During spontaneous intermittent relaxations of the diaphragm, the electrodes stimulate the skeletal muscles of the crural diaphragm, in order to cause contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,535,764 to Imran et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes techniques for diagnosing and treating gastric disorders. A functional device resides within the patient's stomach and is secured to the stomach wall by an attachment device. The functional device may be a sensor for sensing various parameters of the stomach or stomach environment, or may be a therapeutic delivery device. The functional device in one embodiment comprises stimulating electrodes for gastric electrical stimulation.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,696,288 to Kuzmak et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes calibrating apparatus adapted to be inserted into and proceeded within the stomach of human body.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,339 to Kuzmak et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gastric band for forming a stoma opening in a stomach for treating morbid obesity. The band is invasively placed around the stomach, and an expandable portion of the band is used to adjust the diameter of the stoma opening.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,449,368, 5,226,429, and 5,074,868 to Kuzmak, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe adjustable gastric bands. The size of the stoma opening of the bands can be adjusted by injecting into or removing fluid from an expandable section of the gastric bands.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,601,604 to Vincent, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gastric band for placement around the stomach for treating morbid obesity. The inner surface of the band is inflatable through a remote fill port. The band is invasively placed in an encircling position around the stomach by the facile closure of a single fastening means. After the band is fastened around the stomach, a fluid is injected into the inflatable inner surface, thereby constricting the stoma of the stomach.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,298 to Vincent et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a tool for tightening a band or ligature having a buckle end and a free end during laparoscopic surgery.
PCT Publication WO 01/83019 to Vincent, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes apparatus and methods for transferring particles and fluids to or from a body of a patient, including inflating a balloon inside the body during surgical procedures to facilitate the identification of anatomical landmarks and to provide guidance for surgical dissections.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,669 to Klaiber et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes an adjustable gastric band for contracting a patient's stomach in order to fight obesity. A gastric band of a known type, implanted around the stomach and including a cavity filled with liquid, is connected by a tube to a control box and a balancing reservoir which are implanted under the skin of the patient. The box contains an electric pump and an electronic control unit capable of communicating by radio with a monitor carried by the patient and with a controller intended for the doctor. The controller can operate the pump by remote control to transfer determined volumes of liquid in a closed circuit from the gastric band to the reservoir or vice versa, to adjust the diameter of a passage in the stomach. The monitor receives and signals alarms from the control box.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,067,991 to Forsell, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes an adjustable gastric band including an elongated non-inflatable restriction member, a forming device for forming the restriction member into at least a substantially closed loop around the stomach or the esophagus to define a restriction opening, and a post-operation non-invasive adjustment device for mechanically adjusting the restriction member in the loop to change the size of the restriction opening.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,347 to Forsell, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a food intake restriction device for forming a stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus of a patient.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,460,543 to Forsell, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a food intake restriction device for forming a stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus of a patient.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,453,907 to Forsell which is incorporated herein by reference, describes an adjustable gastric band that includes an energy transmission device for wireless transmission of energy of a first form from outside the body of the patient.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,454,699 to Forsell, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes food intake restriction apparatus that includes a restriction device implanted in a patient, which engages the stomach or esophagus to form an upper pouch and a restricted stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus.
U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0066536 to Forsell, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes food intake restriction apparatus, including an operable restriction device implanted in a patient and engaging the stomach or esophagus to form a restricted stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus.
U.S. Patent Application Publication 2001/0011543 to Forsell, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes apparatus for treating morbid obesity or heartburn and reflux disease, including an elongated restriction member formed in a substantially closed loop around a stomach or esophagus of a human to form a stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus.
PCT Publication WO 01/41671 to Cigaina, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a removable gastric band for controlling obesity by allowing control and/or modification of the diameter of a stomach of a patient. The gastric band comprises a closure mechanism, which allows the elongated body to close around a portion of the stomach. The gastric band can be used in conjunction with a gastric electrostimulator, and is therefore described as being potentially useful for inducing forced slimming in the initial phase of treatment for morbigenous obesity. Such electrostimulation devices may either be incorporated into the removable gastric band or located at a distance from the removable gastric band.
European Patent Application Publication 1 036 545 A2 to Moshe, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gastric band for attaching around a circumference of a stomach of a patient, so as to define the diameter of the stomach opening.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,511,490 to Robert, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a gastric banding device for implantation within a person for the treatment of morbid obesity. The gastric banding device includes an inflatable band portion dimensioned to encircle the stomach, and an inflation conduit operable for conducting a percutaneously injected inflation fluid into the band portion.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,801 to Dargent et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes an implantable gastric constriction device comprising a constriction member forming a ring in its operational configuration.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,259,399 to Brown, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a method and apparatus for causing weight loss in obese patients by occupying a segment of the stomach volume using a variable volume bladder filled with fluid.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,234,454 to Bangs, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a method for controlling the body weight of a patient.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,416,267 to Garren et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a stomach insert for treating obesity in humans by reducing the stomach volume.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,454,785 to De Hoyos Garza, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a percutaneous intragastric balloon catheter for the treatment of obesity. The balloon is non-surgically placed in the stomach, and is collocated by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The balloon includes a valve for regulating the amount of fluid introduced or evacuated from the balloon.
INAMED Corporation (Santa Barbara, Calif.) manufactures and markets the LAP-BAND® System, an FDA-approved adjustable and reversible gastric band for treatment of obesity.
Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a known modulator of insulin secretion in the early phases of a meal and a mediator of satiety. In response to ingestion of a meal, GLP-1 is secreted into the blood by L-cells mainly located in the colon and distal small intestine. Administration of GLP-1, either subcutaneously or peripherally, has been shown to improve glycemic control, partially by restoring the first-phase insulin response and suppressing glucagon, and is therefore considered a potential treatment for obesity and Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM).
Todd J F et al., in an article entitled, “Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1): a trial of treatment in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,” Eur J Clin Invest 27(6):533-6 (1997), which is incorporated herein by reference, write that “GLP-1 has the advantages of both suppressing glucagon secretion and delaying gastric emptying.” They conclude, “GLP-1 improves glycaemic control even in the absence of an insulinotropic effect and is a potential treatment for NIDDM.”
U.S. Pat. No. 6,191,102 to DiMarchi et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes pharmaceutical compositions comprising a glucagon-like peptide-1 compound for reducing body weight and treating obesity. The compositions are peripherally administered.
Luiken et al., in an article entitled, “Contraction-induced fatty acid translocase/CD36 translocation in rat cardiac myocytes is mediated through AMP-activated protein kinase signaling,” Diabetes, July, 2003, 52(7):1627-34, which is incorporated herein by reference, write that contraction of rat cardiac myocytes induces translocation of fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36 and GLUT4 from intracellular stores to the sarcolemma, leading to enhanced rates of long-chain fatty acid (FA) and glucose uptake, respectively. Luiken et al. note that because intracellular AMP/ATP is elevated in contracting cardiac myocytes, they investigated whether activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMP kinase) is involved in contraction-inducible FAT/CD36 translocation. The cell-permeable adenosine analog 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranoside (AICAR) and the mitochondrial inhibitor oligomycin, similar to 4-Hz electrostimulation, are described as evoking a more than threefold activation of cardiomyocytic AMP kinase. Both AICAR and oligomycin are described as stimulating FA uptake into noncontracting myocytes by 1.4- and 2.0-fold, respectively, but ineffective in 4 Hz-contracting myocytes. These findings are interpreted to indicate that both agents stimulate FA uptake by a similar mechanism as electrostimulation, involving activation of AMP kinase, as evidenced from phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Furthermore, the stimulating effects of both AICAR and oligomycin were reported as being antagonized by blocking FAT/CD36 with sulfo-N-succinimidylpalmitate, but not by inhibiting phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase with wortmannin, indicating the involvement of FAT/CD36, but excluding a role for insulin signaling. Subcellular fractionation showed that oligomycin was able to mobilize intracellularly stored FAT/CD36 to the sarcolemma. Luiken et al. conclude that AMP kinase regulates-cardiac FA use through mobilization of FAT/CD36 from a contraction-inducible intracellular storage compartment.
The following articles, which are incorporated herein by reference, may be of interest:
In some embodiments of the present invention, gastric control apparatus for treating obesity comprises a controllable mechanical and/or electrical gastric device for modifying a volume of a stomach of a patient, and a set of one or more sensors for sensing physiological parameters indicative of ingestion by the patient. The gastric device is adapted to reduce the stomach volume below an initial stomach volume, so as to cause a sensation of satiety felt by the patient, and therefore generally reduce the patient's appetite. A control unit is adapted to receive one or more signals from the sensors, to analyze the signals, and to drive the gastric device to modify the stomach volume in real-time responsive to the analysis.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the gastric device comprises a gastric band, adapted to be placed around the stomach, and to be tightened and loosened in real time, responsive to signals received from the control unit. Tightening of the band causes a narrowing of the stomach, thereby reducing the volume of the stomach. In other embodiments, the gastric device comprises a gastric balloon, adapted to be placed in the stomach, and to be inflated and deflated in real time, responsive to signals received from the control unit. Inflation of the balloon reduces the effective volume of the stomach, and, directly or indirectly, induces distention of the stomach wall. In still other embodiments, the gastric device comprises a set of one or more electrodes which are applied to the stomach, and apply an electrical signal as to modify a contraction pattern of some of the stomach's muscles, in order to reduce the cross-sectional area of a portion of the stomach.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the control unit is adapted to drive the gastric device to reduce the stomach volume during eating by the patient. The control unit employs an eating detection algorithm to detect the eating, responsive to changes in one or more sensed parameters. The eating detection algorithm typically utilizes one or both of the following sub-algorithms for detecting eating: an impedance sub-algorithm and an electrical slow wave sub-algorithm. An increase in impedance is generally caused by stomach distension resulting from eating. Typically, impedance measurements using electrodes placed on or near the fundus detect eating somewhat earlier than do impedance measurements using electrodes placed on or near the antrum. A decrease in electrical activity in the antrum is generally caused by digestive activity resulting from the stomach filling with food.
The impedance eating detection sub-algorithm typically uses a slow-reacting formula to calculate and remove a baseline impedance value. The formula is slow reacting in order to reduce the effect of noise on the calculation of the baseline impedance value. The sub-algorithm then processes raw real-time impedance measurements by applying both a high-pass filter and a low-pass filter to the measurements, in order to effect a band-pass filter. The resulting processed impedance value is compared to a threshold value, and if found to be greater, is interpreted as an indication of eating. For some applications, the impedance sub-algorithm interprets sudden substantial changes in impedance as indications of changes in posture of the patient, rather than as indications of eating. At least one value in the filter (e.g., the baseline impedance value) is modified in response to the posture-change indication, such that the filter, during this time, operates in a non-linear fashion. Such interpretations of sudden substantial changes in impedance may reduce false detections of eating caused by changes in posture.
The electrical slow-wave eating detection sub-algorithm analyzes real-time electrical measurements, in order to detect electrical events indicative of eating by the patient. The sub-algorithm calculates the average time difference (lag) between successive recent electrical events, and interprets an average greater than a threshold value as indicative of eating. (In general, a decrease in the rate of electrical slow-waves in the antrum occurs during digestive activity caused by the stomach filling with food.) For some applications, the sub-algorithm also compares the average time difference to an upper threshold value, and interprets an average greater than the upper threshold value as indicative of a false eating detection rather than a real eating event. Such false positives may be caused by an occasional lack of detection of a slow wave by the sensors, which erroneously increases the average time difference.
In some embodiments of the present invention, a colonic stimulation system comprises a control unit and one or more electrodes, which are adapted to be applied to respective sites in a vicinity of a colon or a distal small intestine of a patient. The control unit drives the electrodes to apply electrical signals to the sites, and configures the signals to stimulate L-cells or other target tissue, which, responsive to such stimulation, increase secretion of glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1). Such secretion of GLP-1 generally improves glycemic control of the patient, and therefore serves to treat patients suffering from insulin-resistance-related conditions, such as obesity, NIDDM, heart disease, and hypertension, or healthy patients considered at risk for such conditions. For some applications, the colonic stimulation system further comprises an eating detection unit, and the control unit is configured to drive the electrodes to apply the signals responsive to a detection of eating.
The inventors hypothesize that stimulation of the colon or the distal portion of the small intestine, as described herein, may induce up-regulation of insulin sensitivity in some types of cells. This up-regulation may occur by means of (a) an indirect response to the stimulation, and/or (b) secretion of a hormone in response to the stimulation.
In some embodiments of the present invention, a stomach signal application system comprises a control unit and one or more electrodes, which are adapted to be applied to respective sites in a vicinity of a stomach of a patient. The control unit drives the electrodes to apply an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) signal to the sites, and configures the signal to reduce a blood glucose level of the patient. Such an improvement in glycemic control of the patient is generally useful for treating patients suffering from insulin-resistance-related conditions, such as obesity, NIDDM, heart disease, and hypertension, or healthy patients considered at risk for such conditions. For some applications, the stomach stimulation application system further comprises an eating detection unit (e.g., using techniques described herein), and the control unit is configured to drive the electrodes to apply the signal responsive to a detection of eating.
The inventors hypothesize that application of an ETC signal to the stomach, as described herein, may induce up-regulation of insulin sensitivity, either (a) systemically, or (b) in certain types of cells. This up-regulation may occur by means of (a) an indirect response to the stimulation, such as a neural pathway, and/or (b) secretion of a hormone in response to the stimulation. The inventors further hypothesize that the reduction in blood glucose level achieved using these techniques may, at least in part, be mediated by a mechanism other than an increase in insulin secretion by the patient. In particular, the inventors hypothesize that the glucose reduction may occur even in the absence of a rise in insulin.
For some applications, ETC signals are applied in response to a sensed physiological event (e.g., within 10, 100, or 1000 ms of sensing a slow wave). For some applications, ETC signals (which, as described, are non-excitatory) are applied following an artificially-applied excitatory signal (e.g., within 10, 100, or 1000 ms of the application of the excitatory signal). It is noted that although some embodiments of the present invention are described herein with respect to application of an ETC signal, this is by way of illustration and not limitation. For some applications, another signal (e.g., an excitatory signal) is applied without application of an ETC signal.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for detecting a change in posture of a subject, the method including:
measuring an electrical impedance between two or more sites on a stomach of the subject, and generating an impedance signal responsive thereto; and
analyzing the impedance signal in order to detect the change in posture.
For some applications, the method includes:
further analyzing the impedance signal in order to detect an indication of potential eating by the subject; and
interpreting the indication of potential eating as an indication of eating only if the change in posture has not been detected.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for detecting eating by a subject, the method including:
measuring an electrical impedance between two or more sites on a stomach of the subject, and generating an impedance signal responsive thereto;
analyzing the impedance signal in order to detect a change in posture of the subject;
further analyzing the impedance signal in order to detect an indication of potential eating by the subject; and
interpreting the indication of potential eating as an indication of eating only if the change in posture has not been detected.
There is yet further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an electrical signal to a colon or a distal small intestine of the subject; and
configuring the signal to stimulate cells to increase secretion of glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1), in order to treat the subject.
In an embodiment, the method includes detecting eating by the subject, and applying the electrical signal includes applying the signal responsive to detecting the eating.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an electrical signal to a stomach of the subject; and
configuring the electrical signal to reduce a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
In an embodiment, the method includes detecting eating by the subject, wherein applying the electrical signal includes applying the electrical signal responsive to detecting the eating.
Alternatively or additionally, applying the electrical signal includes applying an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) signal.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an electrical signal to a small intestine of the subject; and
configuring the electrical signal to reduce a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
There is yet additionally provided, in accordance With an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) signal to a smooth muscle of the subject; and
configuring the ETC signal to reduce a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
For some applications, applying the ETC signal includes applying the ETC signal to a site of a gastrointestinal tract of the subject. In an embodiment, applying the ETC signal includes applying the ETC signal to a duodenal site of the subject Alternatively or additionally, applying the ETC signal includes applying the ETC signal to a site of a colon of the subject.
There is still additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) signal to cardiac muscle tissue of the subject; and
configuring the ETC signal to reduce a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an electrical signal to at least one stomach site of the subject; and
configuring the electrical signal to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes applying an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) signal.
There is still further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an electrical signal to at least one small intestine site of the subject; and
configuring the electrical signal to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
There is yet further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) electrical signal to at least one smooth muscle site of the subject; and
configuring the ETC electrical signal to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
In an embodiment, the smooth muscle site includes a gastrointestinal tract site of the subject, and applying the ETC electrical signal includes applying the ETC electrical signal to the gastrointestinal tract site.
In an embodiment, the gastrointestinal tract site includes a duodenal site of the subject, and applying the ETC electrical signal includes applying the ETC electrical signal to the duodenal site.
In an embodiment, the gastrointestinal tract site includes a colon site of the subject, and applying the ETC electrical signal includes applying the ETC electrical signal to the colon site.
In an embodiment, the at least one site includes a gastric corpus site and a gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the gastric corpus site and the gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the gastric corpus site includes a posterior gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior gastric corpus site and the gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the gastric antrum site includes a posterior gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior gastric corpus site and the posterior gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the gastric antrum site includes an anterior gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior gastric corpus site and the anterior gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the gastric corpus site includes an anterior gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior gastric corpus site and the gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the gastric antrum site includes a posterior gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior gastric corpus site and the posterior gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the gastric antrum site includes an anterior gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior gastric corpus site and the anterior gastric antrun site.
In an embodiment, the at least one site includes a first gastric corpus site and a second gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the first gastric corpus site and the second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the first gastric corpus site includes a posterior first gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior first gastric corpus site and the second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric corpus site includes a posterior second gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior first gastric corpus site and the posterior second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric corpus site includes an anterior second gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior first gastric corpus site and the anterior second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the first gastric corpus site includes an anterior first gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior first gastric corpus site and the second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric corpus site includes a posterior second gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior first gastric corpus site and the posterior second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric corpus site includes an anterior second gastric corpus site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior first gastric corpus site and the anterior second gastric corpus site.
In an embodiment, the at least one site includes a first gastric antrum site and a second gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the first gastric antrum site and the second gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the first gastric antrum site includes a posterior first gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior first gastric antrum site and the second gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric antrum site includes a posterior second gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior first gastric antrum site and the posterior second gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric antrum site includes an anterior second gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the posterior first gastric antrum site and the anterior second gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the first gastric antrum site includes an anterior first gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior first gastric antrum site and the second gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric antrum site includes a posterior second gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior first gastric antrum site and the posterior second gastric antrum site.
In an embodiment, the second gastric antrum site includes an anterior second gastric antrum site, and applying the signal includes applying the signal between the anterior first gastric antrum site and the anterior second gastric antrum site.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a subject, including:
applying an Excitable-Tissue Control ETC) electrical signal to at least one cardiac muscle tissue site of the subject; and
configuring the ETC electrical signal to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject, in order to treat the subject.
In an embodiment, configuring the electrical signal includes configuring the electrical signal to reduce a rise in a blood insulin level of the subject.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes applying five or more pulses to the site during each of a plurality of slow wave cycles of the subject.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes applying 1 to 5 pulses to the site during each of a plurality of slow wave cycles of the subject. In an embodiment, applying 1 to 5 pulses includes applying one pulse to the site during each of the plurality of slow wave cycles.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes configuring a frequency of the electrical signal to be between 1 and 30 Hz. In an embodiment, configuring the frequency includes configuring the frequency to be between 10 and 30 Hz. In an embodiment, configuring the frequency includes configuring the frequency to be between 1 and 10 Hz. configuring the frequency includes configuring the frequency to be between 2.5 and 7.5 Hz.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes configuring a frequency of the electrical signal to be between 30 and 200 Hz. In an embodiment, configuring the frequency includes configuring the frequency to be between 100 and 200 Hz. In an embodiment, configuring the frequency includes configuring the frequency to be between 30 and 100 Hz. In an embodiment, configuring the frequency includes configuring the frequency to be between 60 and 100 Hz.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes applying pulses and configuring a pulse amplitude of the pulses to be between 2 and 15 mA. In an embodiment, configuring the pulse amplitude includes configuring the pulse amplitude to be between 2.5 and 7.5 mA.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes applying pulses in a pulse train and configuring a length of the pulse train to be between 1 and 6 seconds. In an embodiment, configuring the length of the pulse train includes configuring the length of the pulse train to be between 3 and 6 seconds.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes applying a train of biphasic pulses. In an embodiment, applying the train of biphasic pulses includes setting a duration of each phase of the biphasic pulses to be between 1 and 10 ms. In an embodiment, setting the duration includes setting the duration of each phase of the biphasic pulses to be between 4 and 6 ms.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes sensing a physiological attribute of the subject and applying the electrical signal responsive thereto. In an embodiment, sensing the physiological attribute of the subject includes sensing that the subject is eating. In an embodiment, sensing the physiological attribute includes sensing a gastrointestinal tract attribute. In an embodiment, sensing the gastrointestinal tract attribute includes sensing a slow wave.
In an embodiment, applying the electrical signal includes:
applying an initiating pulse; and
applying a burst of pulses at least 100 ms following a termination of the initiating pulse.
In an embodiment, applying the initiating pulse includes applying the initiating pulse not responsively to any physiological attribute of the subject sensed within one minute prior to the applying of the initiating pulse.
In an embodiment, applying the initiating pulse includes applying the initiating pulse not responsively to any sensing of a slow wave within one minute prior to the applying of the initiating pulse.
In an embodiment, applying the burst of pulse includes configuring a frequency of the burst of pulses to be between 1 and 10 Hz.
In an embodiment, applying the burst of pulse includes configuring a frequency of the burst of pulses to be between 10 and 100 Hz.
In an embodiment, applying the initiating pulse includes sensing a physiological attribute of the subject and applying the initiating pulse responsive thereto. In an embodiment, sensing the physiological attribute includes sensing a gastrointestinal tract attribute of the subject. In an embodiment, sensing the gastrointestinal tract attribute includes sensing an indication of a slow wave. In an embodiment, sensing the gastrointestinal tract attribute includes sensing an indication of eating by the subject.
In an embodiment, applying the burst of pulses at least 100 ms following the termination of the initiating pulse includes initiating applying the burst of pulses less than 4 seconds following the termination of the initiating pulse. In an embodiment, applying the burst of pulse includes initiating applying the burst of pulses between 100 and 500 ms following the termination of the initiating pulse. In an embodiment, applying the initiating pulse includes configuring a duration of the initiating pulse to be between 50 and 500 ms. In an embodiment, configuring the duration includes configuring the duration to be between 50 and 150 ms.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for treating a subject, including:
a set of at least one electrode, adapted to be applied to a respective at least one stomach site of the subject, and
a control unit, adapted to drive the electrode set to apply an electrical signal configured to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject.
There is still additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for treating a subject, including:
a set of at least one electrode, adapted to be applied to a respective at least one small intestine site of the subject; and
a control unit, adapted to drive the electrode set to apply an electrical signal configured to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject.
There is yet additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for treating a subject, including:
a set of at least one electrode, adapted to be applied to a respective at least one smooth muscle site of the subject; and
a control unit, adapted to drive the electrode set to apply an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) electrical signal configured to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for treating a subject, including:
a set of at least one electrode, adapted to be applied to a respective at least one cardiac muscle tissue site of the subject; and
a control unit, adapted to drive the electrode set to apply an Excitable-Tissue Control (ETC) electrical signal configured to reduce a rise in a blood glucose level of the subject.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings, in which:
Reference is now made to
Apparatus 18 typically further comprises a set of one or more sensors 68 for sensing physiological parameters indicative of ingestion by the patient. Sensors 68 may comprise, for example, one or more dedicated local sense electrodes 74, which are typically placed on or in stomach 20, and convey electrical signals to control unit 90 responsive to natural gastric electric activity. Alternatively or additionally, sensors 68 comprise one or more mechanical sensors 70 (e.g., accelerometers, force transducers, strain gauges, or pressure gauges), which are placed on or in stomach 20 and are coupled to control unit 90. Further alternatively or additionally, sensors 68 comprise one or more supplemental sensors 72 (e.g., pH sensors, blood sugar sensors, intragastric pressure sensors and/or sonometric sensors), which are placed on or in the gastrointestinal tract or elsewhere on or in the body of the patient, and are coupled to control unit 90. In an embodiment, one or more of sensors 68 are fixed to a surface of gastric device 26 that comes in contact with tissue of stomach 20, such as the inner surface of gastric band 32 or the outer surface of balloon 36.
Control unit 90 is adapted to receive one or more signals from sensors 68, to analyze the signals, and to drive gastric device 26 to adjust in real-time the magnitude of stomach volume reduction responsive to the analysis. The reduced stomach volume increases the sensation of satiety felt by the patient compared to that which would be felt without such stomach volume reduction, and therefore generally reduces the patient's appetite so as to treat the obesity. Typically, control unit 90 and sensors 68 are permanently or semi-permanently implanted in or coupled to the body of the patient. The number of sensors, as well as the positions thereof, are shown in
In an embodiment of the present invention, control unit 90 employs an eating detection algorithm to detect eating by the patient, responsive to changes in one or more sensed parameters. The eating detection algorithm typically utilizes one or both of the following sub-algorithms for detecting eating: an impedance sub-algorithm and an electrical slow wave sub-algorithm. An increase in impedance is generally caused by stomach distension resulting from eating. A decrease in the rate of electrical activity in the antrum is generally caused by digestive activity resulting from the stomach filling with food.
Upon detection of an eating event, control unit 90 drives gastric device 26 to reduce a volume of stomach 20, so as to limit an ability of the patient to eat, because over-eating results in nausea, vomiting, and/or loss of appetite. Cessation of eating is typically determined by: (a) no longer detecting a particular indication of eating, and/or (b) running analogous algorithms to those described herein, but establishing different thresholds, indicative of, for example, reduction of findic pressure or restoration of basal slow-wave rates. Upon identifying the cessation of eating, the control drives gastric device 26 to restore the original stomach volume, so as, for example, to prevent counterproductive remodeling of the stomach. Alternatively or additionally, upon detection of an eating event, control unit 90 applies:
Further alternatively or additionally, upon detection of an eating event, control unit 90 uses one or more techniques known in the art, including, but not limited to:
The control unit is typically configured to invoke the eating detection algorithm periodically, e.g., by sampling once every 100 milliseconds. In an embodiment of the present invention, control unit 90 implements the eating detection algorithms and sub-algorithms as a state machine.
Control unit 90 is typically configurable to allow a healthcare worker to specify which of the sub-algorithms the eating detection algorithm utilizes. If the use of both sub-algorithms is specified, the control unit performs both of the sub-algorithms essentially simultaneously, e.g., by using two microprocessors, or, alternatively, by time-sharing a single microprocessor. In addition, in such a case, the control unit is typically further configurable to specify whether an indication from both sub-algorithms is required in order for the eating detection algorithm to determine that an eating event is occurring (i.e., a logical AND operation), or whether an indication from just one of the sub-algorithms is sufficient (i.e., a logical OR operation). If an AND operation is specified, the control unit is typically still further configurable to specify the required degree of synchrony between eating detection by the two sub-algorithms, as described hereinbelow with reference to
Reference is made to
Upon receipt of impedance measurement 202, sub-algorithm 200 uses the impedance measurement to calculate a baseline value of the impedance, at a baseline calculation step 204. Sub-algorithm 200 typically uses a slow-reacting formula for calculating the baseline value, in order to avoid having high frequency noise affect the calculation of the baseline. For example, the sub-algorithm may use the following equation to calculate and update the baseline value:
B=[B*(N1−1)+X]/(N1*N3)
where B is the baseline value (initialized to zero), N1 is a constant, e.g., 512, X is impedance measurement 202, and N3 is a configurable parameter, typically having a value between about 1 and about 10. For example, N3 may have a value selected from 1, 2, 4, and 8. Higher values of N3 result in slower convergences of B to the baseline.
Sub-algorithm 200 applies a high-pass filter to impedance measurement 202, by comparing the measurement to the baseline value, at a high-pass filter step 206. Typically, the sub-algorithm performs this comparison by subtracting the baseline value from impedance measurement 202, resulting in an impedance variance value, i.e., the extent to which the impedance measurement varies from the baseline. Upon initialization of sub-algorithm 200, the sub-algorithm may repeat step 204 for a certain number of periods, so as to obtain a reasonable convergence on the baseline value, prior to performing step 206 for the first time. For some applications, this repetition of step 204 is performed during each cycle through sub-algorithm 200.
At a low-pass filter step 208, sub-algorithm 200 applies a low-pass filter to the impedance variance value, resulting in a processed impedance value. This low-pass filtering serves to smooth variations in the impedance variance value, and to filter out spurious high values. For example, sub-algorithm 200 may use the following equation to perform the low-pass filtering:
S=[S*(2N4−1)+ΔX]/2N4
wherein S is the processed impedance value (initialized to zero), N4 is a configurable parameter, typically having a value between about 1 and about 5, and ΔX is the impedance variance value. For example, N4 may have a value selected from 1, 2, 3, and 4. Higher values of N4 tend to reduce false positive indications of eating, while lower values tend to reduce false negatives. In general, any of the values 1-4 is suitable.
Sub-algorithm 200 compares the processed impedance value to a configurable threshold value, at a threshold check step 210. The threshold value typically is between about 2 and about 80 ohms. For example, the threshold value may be between about 30 and about 40 ohms when local sense electrodes 74 are placed about 2.5 cm apart, approximately 2 cm inferior to the gastroesophageal junction. Because the processed impedance value represents a difference between impedance measurement 202 and the baseline value, the threshold value is typically expressed as an absolute value (i.e., in ohms), rather than as a percentage change. If sub-algorithm 200 finds that the processed impedance value is greater than the threshold, the sub-algorithm generates an impedance condition signal, at an eating detected step 212. Otherwise, the sub-algorithm waits until a new impedance measurement 202 is generated, and repeats the method. (In embodiments of the present invention that include the AND synchrony techniques described hereinbelow with reference to
Reference is now made to
After applying the low-pass filter at step 208, as described hereinabove with reference to
d=St−St-N5
where d is a difference between the current and previous processed impedance values, St is the current processed impedance value, and St-N5 is the processed impedance value calculated based on the impedance measurement taken N5 periods earlier. As mentioned above, each measurement period may have a duration of 100 ms. For protocols having different measurement periods, N5 and other parameters may be suitably changed, mutatis mutandis. N5 is a configurable parameter, which typically has a value between about 1 and about 500 measurement periods, when such measurement periods have a duration of 100 ms. For example, N5 may have a value selected from 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, and 200 measurement periods.
The absolute value of the difference d is compared to a preconfigured threshold value, at a difference check step 224. If the difference is greater than the threshold, at a reset baseline step 226 sub-algorithm 220 resets the baseline value, by adding the current processed impedance value to the baseline value. (If the current processed impedance value is negative, such addition decreases the baseline value.) Sub-algorithm 220 waits until a new impedance measurement 202 is generated, and repeats the method. If, however, sub-algorithm 220 finds at step 224 that the difference is less than or equal to the threshold value, the sub-algorithm proceeds to check step 210, as described hereinabove with reference to
For some applications, if N5 is greater than 1, sub-algorithm 220 performs check steps 224 and 210 only once per every N5 impedance measurements. Such reduced-frequency testing generally reduces power consumption and thus extends battery life of battery-operated implementations of gastric control apparatus 18.
The performance of steps 222, 224, and 226 may serve to reduce false detections of eating caused by changes in posture of the patient Changes in posture sometimes cause sudden substantial changes in impedance measurement 202. Such changes in impedance are typically larger and more sudden than changes generally caused by the commencement of eating (and the resultant gradual increase in stomach volume), and generally continue as long as the patient maintains the new posture. By resetting the baseline value at step 226, sub-algorithm 220 incorporates the sudden change in impedance into the baseline value. Sub-algorithm 220 uses the reset baseline value for the high-pass filter at step 206, beginning with the next cycle through the algorithm. It is noted that any false negatives that may be caused by the performance of steps 222, 224, and 226 are generally transient. The short delay before sub-algorithm 220 subsequently detects eating generally does not meaningfully affect the performance of gastric control apparatus 18.
Reference is now made to
If, however, sub-algorithm 300 detects an event at step 306, the sub-algorithm records the time of the event, at a record time step 308. The sub-algorithm then calculates the time difference (lag) between the current event and the most recent previous event, and averages the most recent N6 time differences (including the current time difference), at an average calculation step 310. N6 typically has a value between about 1 and about 10; for example, N6 may be configurable to be selected from 1, 2, 4, and 6. Sub-algorithm 300 compares the average with a lower threshold value, which is typically between about 20 and about 30 seconds, at a lower threshold comparison step 312. In general, a decrease in the rate of electrical slow-waves in the antrum occurs during digestive activity caused by the stomach filling with food. Therefore, if sub-algorithm 300 finds that the average is greater than or equal to the lower threshold value, the sub-algorithm interprets such a finding as indicative of potential eating by the patient, and proceeds to an upper threshold comparison step 314, described below. On the other hand, if the sub-algorithm finds that the average is less than the lower threshold value, the sub-algorithm waits until another electrical measurement 302 is taken, and returns to the beginning of the method.
At upper threshold comparison step 314, sub-algorithm 300 compares the average time difference with an upper threshold value, which is typically between about 25 and about 80 seconds, e.g., between about 60 and 80 seconds. (The upper threshold value is typically between about 3 and about 4 times greater than the basal level of the time difference.) This comparison generally reduces false eating detections that may be caused by an occasional lack of detection of a slow wave by local sense electrodes 74. If sub-algorithm 300 finds that the average is less than the upper threshold value, the sub-algorithm generates a slow-wave condition signal, at an eating detected step 316. On the other hand, if the sub-algorithm finds that the average is greater than or equal to the upper threshold value, the sub-algorithm waits until another electrical measurement 302 is taken, and returns to the beginning of the method. For some applications, sub-algorithm omits step 314, and proceeds directly from step 312 to step 316 if the sub-algorithm finds that the average is greater than or equal to the lower threshold value. (In embodiments of the present invention that include the AND synchrony techniques described hereinbelow with reference to
In an embodiment, eating detection based on interpreting electrical activity of the stomach, as described hereinabove, is supplemented by or replaced by one or more of the following protocols:
For some applications, multiple possible indications of eating are analyzed in combination, to increase the reliability of a determination by control unit 90 that eating is beginning. For example, if five possible indicators are evaluated, then a determination of eating may be made only if at least four out of five of the indicators are positive. In an embodiment, some of the indicators (e.g., changes in impedance and/or changes in the spacing between successive slow waves) are given a higher weight than the others.
Reference is made to
The default state of control unit 90 is a waiting state 350. Upon initialization of this state, the control unit initializes the following variables (each of which is described hereinbelow): (a) Actual Z is set equal to NO, (b) tLastNoZ is set equal to negative infinity (or a number representative thereof, such as −32768), and (c) tRate is set equal to negative infinity (or a number representative thereof, such as −32768). While in the waiting state, the control unit periodically or substantially constantly monitors whether sub-algorithms 200 and 220 generate signals, by performing the following three check steps substantially simultaneously, or by rapidly cycling through the following three check steps:
If the control unit detects an impedance condition signal at check step 352, the control unit transitions to a check impedance state 354. Upon entering check impedance state 354, control-unit 90 sets an Actual Z flag equal to YES, at a set flag step 356. This flag indicates that an impedance condition is currently occurring. The control unit then subtracts tRate (which is equal to negative infinity, until a value has been received together with a slow-wave signal, as described hereinabove with reference to step 316 of
While in waiting state 350, if the control unit detects a non-impedance condition signal at check step 362, the control unit transitions to a non-impedance state 364. If, at an Actual Z check step 366, the control unit finds that Actual Z equals YES, the control unit sets Actual Z to NO, at an Actual Z set step 368. In addition, at a tLastNoZ set step 370, the control unit sets tLastNoZ equal to tnon Z, which was generated as described hereinabove with reference to
While in waiting state 350, if the control unit detects a slow-wave condition signal at check step 374, the control unit transitions to a check slow-wave state 376. The control unit checks whether Actual Z equals YES, at an Actual Z check step 378. If the control unit finds that Actual Z does equal YES, indicating that the control unit has received the slow-wave condition signal during an active impedance condition, then the control unit generates an eating event, at eating event generation step 360, and concludes the algorithm. On the other hand, if the control unit finds that Actual Z does not equal YES, the control unit checks whether tRate−tLastNoZ is less than H, at check step 372. If the control unit finds that tRate−tLastNoZ is less than H, indicating that the most recent impedance event concluded within H seconds of detection of the current slow-wave, then the control unit generates an eating event, at eating event generation step 360, and concludes the algorithm Otherwise, the control unit transitions back to waiting state 350.
For some applications, control unit 90 drives gastric device 26 to reduce and/or restore the stomach volume according to a schedule, so as to induce reduction of the stomach volume at times when the patient might choose to eat but should not be eating, or when the patient's eating should be minimized. At other times, e.g., when the patient is sleeping, control unit 90 drives gastric device 26 to restore the stomach volume. Alternatively or additionally, control unit 90 (a) reduces the stomach volume during one or more meals during the day, so as to reduce the patient's appetite during those meals, and (b) restores the stomach volume during meals eaten during the remainder of the day, so as to prevent undesired side effects (e.g., nutritional deficiencies) which might occur in some patients from any inappropriate, excessive use of the stomach volume reduction techniques described herein.
Alternatively or additionally, the patient activates, deactivates, and modulates the level of stomach volume reduction in accordance with physician's instructions, aspects of the patient's diet, or other factors. For example, the patient may eat soup and salad at dinner, and then activate the control unit using operator controls 71, so as to increase the sense of satiety prior to being presented with a large selection of high-calorie options for an entree. The patient may subsequently input a command for a higher level of stomach volume reduction during dessert, such that the patient will feel very full, and, in fact, not have space for the dessert It is seen through this example that this embodiment of the present invention can be used to encourage the patient to fully satisfy all nutritional needs, while simultaneously reducing or eliminating the hunger sensation which the patient would otherwise feel if stomach 20 were not in the reduced volume state caused by gastric device 26.
Reference is again made to
Alternatively or additionally, other techniques described in one or more of the publications referred to in the Background of the Invention are utilized for controllably adjusting the circumference of gastric band 32.
Reference is again made to
Reference is again made to
Typically, control unit 90 drives electrodes 100 to apply the enhancement signal so as to create a contraction pattern of some of the muscles of stomach 20, in order to reduce the cross-sectional area of a portion 22 of the stomach. This reduction is believed to increase the sensation of satiety felt by the patient compared to that which was felt prior to application of the enhancement signal. Typically, the enhancement signal is configured such that the cross-sectional area of the stomach is reduced by at least 20%, and this reduction is maintained in one region of the stomach for a period of at least 1 minute. It is to be understood that for some applications, greater or lesser reductions in cross-sectional area may be desirable, and these may be maintained for periods greater or less than 1 minute.
Electrodes 100 typically comprise one or more signal application electrodes 30, which may also operate in a sensing mode. Electrodes 100 are typically coupled to the serosal layer of the stomach and/or inserted into the muscular layer of the stomach. Alternatively or additionally, the electrodes are coupled elsewhere on the stomach, gastrointestinal tract, or to other suitable locations in or on the body of the patient. The number of electrodes, as well as the positions thereof, are shown in
For some applications, techniques described herein are performed in combination with techniques described in the above-referenced U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/0161414. For example, in embodiments of the present invention that comprise electrodes 100, control unit 90 may utilize the techniques described in the '414 patent application publication with reference to
For some applications, electrodes 100 apply electrical stimulation in combination with the mechanical stomach volume modification techniques described hereinabove with reference to
Reference is now made to
Using known calibration and optimization procedures, a range of suitable waveforms could be determined by a person of ordinary skill in the art who has read the disclosure of the present patent application. For some applications, the electrical signals are applied in bursts of pulses, where the frequency of the pulses within each burst is typically between about 1 and 200 Hz. In an embodiment, this frequency is between about 5 and 50 Hz. Each burst is typically spaced from a following burst by a spacing of approximately 1-15 seconds. For some applications, pre-selected parameters are fixed, or varied occasionally (for example, upon a visit to a physician). For other applications, the parameters are varied in real time. In one such application, detection of eating, excessive eating, or high glucose levels causes control unit 404 to increase the frequency of the pulses in each burst and/or to decrease the spacing between successive bursts.
In an embodiment, signals are applied to the colon using signal parameters described in the above-referenced PCT Patent Publication WO 99/03533 to Ben-Haim et al., entitled, “Smooth muscle controller,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/481,253. In this embodiment, natural electrical activity of the colon is typically sensed, and an ETC signal is applied responsive thereto.
In an embodiment of the present invention, colonic stimulation system 400 further comprises an eating detection unit 410, which is adapted to detect eating by the patient. Control unit 404 is configured to drive electrodes 406 responsive to the detection of eating. The control unit typically drives the electrodes to begin stimulation (a) substantially simultaneously with the commencement of eating, (b) between about one and about 5 minutes after the commencement of eating, or (c) between about one and about 5 minutes prior to commencement of eating. (Option (c) is possible because some of the techniques for eating detection described hereinbelow detect the anticipation of imminent eating.)
Eating detection unit 410 detects eating using (a) one or more of the techniques described hereinabove, (b) eating detection techniques known in the art, and/or (c) eating detection techniques described in one or more of the following patents and patent application publications:
In another embodiment of the present invention, control unit 404 is configured to drive electrodes 406 generally constantly, not responsive to detection of eating. Alternatively, the stimulation is applied periodically, such as once to several times an hour, during certain times of day or night, or in response to a command from the subject.
Reference is made to
Measurements were taken on three separate days, each following twenty-four-hour fasting, while the dog was conscious. Stimulation was applied on two of these days, and the third day served as a control. On each of the days, eating began at time 0 and continued for about 10 minutes. The graphs in
On the two stimulation days, stimulation was applied for 20 minutes beginning substantially simultaneously with the commencement of eating (at 0 minutes). A line 504 (
Reference is now made to
Control unit 602 configures the ETC signal to reduce a blood glucose level of the patient. Such an improvement in glycemic control of the patient is generally useful for treating patients suffering from insulin-resistance-related conditions, such as obesity, NIDDM, heart disease, and hypertension, or healthy patients considered at risk for such conditions.
In an embodiment, the ETC signals are applied to the stomach using signal parameters described in the above-referenced PCT Patent Publication WO 99/03533 to Ben-Haim et al. and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/481,253. For some applications, control unit 602 configures the ETC signal to have a waveform having between about 1 and about 150 biphasic pulses, e.g., 100 pulses, each phase of each pulse having an amplitude of between about 3 mA and about 12 mA, e.g., about 8 mA, and a duration of between about 3 ms and about 10 ms, e.g., 6 ms. For some applications, the waveform is applied following detection of the onset of each slow wave of stomach 20 (typically about 3 times per minute). For some applications, pre-selected parameters are fixed, or varied occasionally (for example, upon a visit to a physician). For other applications, the parameters are varied in real time.
In an embodiment of the present invention, stomach signal application system 600 further comprises an eating detection unit 610, which is adapted to detect eating by the patient. Control unit 602 is configured to drive electrodes 604 responsive to the detection of eating. The control unit typically drives the electrodes to begin stimulation (a) substantially simultaneously with the commencement of eating, (b) between about one and about 5 minutes after the commencement of eating, or (c) between about one and about 5 minutes prior to commencement of eating. (Option (c) is possible because some of the techniques for eating detection described herein detect the anticipation of imminent eating.)
Eating detection unit 610 detects eating using (a) one or more of the techniques described hereinabove, (b) eating detection techniques known in the art, and/or (c) eating detection techniques described in one or more of the following patents and patent application publications:
In another embodiment of the present invention, control unit 602 is configured to drive electrodes 604 generally constantly, not responsive to detection of eating. Alternatively, the stimulation is applied periodically, such as once to several times an hour, during certain times of day or night, or in response to a command from the subject.
Reference is made to
Measurements were taken on two separate days, at about the same time on each day, following twelve-hour fasting, while the dog was conscious. An ETC signal was applied on one of these days, and the other day served as a control. On each of the days, eating began at time 0 and continued for about two minutes. The ETC signal was applied beginning at time 0 and continuing for about 15 minutes. Measurements were taken using the same glucose meter on both days, and validation of each measurement was performed using two different sets of measurement kits.
A dashed line 700 and a solid line 702 show the measurements taken on the control day and the signal application day, respectively. As can be seen, application of the ETC signal resulted in a substantial reduction in blood glucose level at all points during the measurement period.
Reference is made to
A dashed line 720 and a solid line 722 show the measurements taken on the control day and the signal application day, respectively. As can be seen, application of the ETC signal resulted in a substantial reduction in blood glucose level during the measurement period.
Although the experiments described hereinabove with reference to
At time zero (as shown in
Subsequently, a second initiating pulse was applied twelve seconds after the first initiating pulse, i.e., approximately 20% earlier than the next slow wave would typically be expected to be recorded. The second initiating pulse was also followed by a signal burst, as described hereinabove. (In an embodiment for which experiments have not been performed, values between 10% and 30% are used.) The second initiating pulse and/or associated signal burst triggered antral electrical activity to occur which was measured and which appeared characteristic of a slow wave. Subsequently, additional initiating pulses and signal bursts were applied at 12 second intervals, for the remainder of the 60 minute stimulation period.
Blood samples were taken approximately every 7 minutes, prior to, during, and following the stimulation period. In the upper graph of
In both the glucose and the insulin graphs of
In an embodiment, antral electrical activity is not sensed in a patient, but the initiating pulses and signal bursts are applied at intervals 10-30% faster than a normal slow wave cycle in the patient. For some applications, the initiating pulses and signal bursts are applied not responsively to any measured gastrointestinal tract activity.
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 5 ms pulse durations described with respect to
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 5 mA pulses described with respect to
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 300 ms delay between the initiating pulse and the signal burst described with respect to
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 100 ms pulse duration of the initiating pulse described with respect to
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 4 second signal burst duration described with respect to
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 5 Hz frequency of the signal burst described with respect to
In an embodiment, instead of or in addition to the 5 Hz frequency of the signal burst described with respect to
In an embodiment, the initiating pulse as described with respect to
In an embodiment, electrical activity of the corpus is sensed, in addition to or instead of sensing antral electrical activity.
In an embodiment, signal bursts are applied between electrodes on the corpus and electrodes on the antrum. For example, the electrodes may be placed on: (a) a posterior portion of the antrum and a posterior portion of the corpus; (b) a posterior portion of the antrum and an anterior portion of the corpus; (c) a posterior portion of the corpus and an anterior portion of the antrum; and/or (d) an anterior portion of the corpus and an anterior portion of the antrum.
Alternatively or additionally, signal bursts are applied between one or more electrodes on one portion of the corpus (e.g., a posterior portion) and one or more electrodes on another portion of the corpus (e.g., an anterior portion). Alternatively or additionally, signal bursts are applied between one or more electrodes on one portion of the antrum (e.g., a posterior portion) and one or more electrodes on another portion of the antrum (e.g., an anterior portion).
For some applications, techniques described herein are practiced in combination with techniques described in one or more of the following, which are assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/123,532, PCT Patent Application IL00/00132, PCT Patent Application IL00/00566, PCT Patent Application IL03/00736, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/914,889, or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/237,263.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.
This application is a continuation of co-pending PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IL2004/000664, filed Jul. 21, 2004, which is based upon and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/488,964 to Ben-Haim et al., filed Jul. 21, 2003, entitled, “Gastrointestinal methods and apparatus for use in treating disorders and controlling blood sugar,” which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1918386 | Esau | Jul 1933 | A |
2593067 | Spencer | Apr 1952 | A |
3211154 | Becker et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3411507 | Wingrove | Nov 1968 | A |
3516412 | Ackerman | Jun 1970 | A |
3541390 | Jahnke | Nov 1970 | A |
3572345 | Auphan | Mar 1971 | A |
3587567 | Schiff | Jun 1971 | A |
3650277 | Sjostrand et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3651805 | Breiling | Mar 1972 | A |
3651806 | Hirshberg | Mar 1972 | A |
3658051 | MacLean | Apr 1972 | A |
3737579 | Bolduc | Jun 1973 | A |
3796221 | Hagfors | Mar 1974 | A |
3911930 | Hagfors et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3924641 | Weiss | Dec 1975 | A |
3933147 | Du Vall et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3942536 | Mirowski et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3944740 | Murase et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3952750 | Mirowski et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4000745 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4010758 | Rockland et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4030509 | Heilman et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4055190 | Tany | Oct 1977 | A |
4106494 | McEachern | Aug 1978 | A |
4133315 | Berman et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4164216 | Person | Aug 1979 | A |
4165454 | Carlsson et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4168711 | Cannon, III et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4177818 | De Pedro | Dec 1979 | A |
4184493 | Langer et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4202340 | Langer et al. | May 1980 | A |
4223678 | Langer et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4235246 | Weiss | Nov 1980 | A |
4237895 | Johnson | Dec 1980 | A |
4273114 | Berkalow et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4280503 | Ackerman | Jul 1981 | A |
4293734 | Pepper, Jr. | Oct 1981 | A |
4312354 | Walters | Jan 1982 | A |
4313448 | Stokes | Feb 1982 | A |
4315503 | Ryaby et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4316472 | Mirowski et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4337776 | Daly et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4342896 | Teich | Aug 1982 | A |
4354153 | Lentz | Oct 1982 | A |
4357946 | Dutcher et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4369791 | Friedman | Jan 1983 | A |
4377733 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4378023 | Trabucco | Mar 1983 | A |
4384585 | Zipes | May 1983 | A |
4387717 | Brownlee et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4403614 | Engle et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4406288 | Horwinski et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4407288 | Langer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4411268 | Cox | Oct 1983 | A |
4416267 | Garren et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4428366 | Findl et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4431888 | Simpson | Feb 1984 | A |
4440172 | Langer | Apr 1984 | A |
4447693 | Buck | May 1984 | A |
4452254 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4475024 | Tateda | Oct 1984 | A |
4485805 | Foster, Jr. | Dec 1984 | A |
4506680 | Stokes | Mar 1985 | A |
4537195 | McDonnell | Aug 1985 | A |
4537203 | Machida | Aug 1985 | A |
4543738 | Mower | Oct 1985 | A |
4543956 | Herscovici | Oct 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabusth | Oct 1985 | A |
4552150 | Zacouto | Nov 1985 | A |
4554922 | Prystowsky et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4554992 | Kassai | Nov 1985 | A |
4559946 | Mower | Dec 1985 | A |
4559947 | Renger et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4566456 | Koning et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4572191 | Mirowski et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4592339 | Kuzmak | Jun 1986 | A |
4596915 | Simpson | Jun 1986 | A |
4628934 | Pohndorf et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637397 | Jones et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4639720 | Rympalski et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4651716 | Forester et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4674508 | DeCote | Jun 1987 | A |
4679572 | Baker, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4686332 | Greanias et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4690155 | Hess | Sep 1987 | A |
4693253 | Adams | Sep 1987 | A |
4708145 | Tacker et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4717581 | Robblee | Jan 1988 | A |
4726279 | Kepler et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4726379 | Altman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4765341 | Mower et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4807632 | Liess et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4823808 | Clegg et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4830006 | Haluska et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834100 | Charms | May 1989 | A |
4850959 | Findl | Jul 1989 | A |
4870974 | Wang | Oct 1989 | A |
4873986 | Wallace | Oct 1989 | A |
4878553 | Yamanami et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884576 | Alt | Dec 1989 | A |
4914624 | Dunthorn et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4928688 | Mower | May 1990 | A |
4967749 | Cohen | Nov 1990 | A |
4971058 | Pless et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4975682 | Kerr et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4979507 | Heinz et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4988837 | Murakami et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996984 | Sweeney | Mar 1991 | A |
4998531 | Bocchi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4998532 | Griffith | Mar 1991 | A |
5002052 | Haluska et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003976 | Alt | Apr 1991 | A |
5018522 | Mehra | May 1991 | A |
5020544 | Dahl et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022396 | Watanabe | Jun 1991 | A |
5025787 | Sutherland et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026397 | Aoki et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031617 | Klettner | Jul 1991 | A |
5041107 | Heil, Jr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5044375 | Bach, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5048522 | Petrofsky | Sep 1991 | A |
5050612 | Matsumura | Sep 1991 | A |
5063929 | Bartelt et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5074868 | Kuzmak | Dec 1991 | A |
5083564 | Scherlag | Jan 1992 | A |
5083565 | Parins | Jan 1992 | A |
5085218 | Heil et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5087243 | Avitall | Feb 1992 | A |
5097832 | Buchanan | Mar 1992 | A |
5097833 | Campos | Mar 1992 | A |
5097843 | Soukup et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101814 | Palti | Apr 1992 | A |
5103804 | Abele et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105812 | Corman | Apr 1992 | A |
5107834 | Ideker et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5111814 | Goldfarb | May 1992 | A |
5111815 | Mower | May 1992 | A |
5129394 | Mehra | Jul 1992 | A |
5133354 | Kallok | Jul 1992 | A |
5137021 | Wayne et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144554 | Zhang et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5154501 | Svenson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156147 | Warren et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156149 | Hudrlik | Oct 1992 | A |
5161527 | Nappholz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163427 | Keimel | Nov 1992 | A |
5163428 | Pless | Nov 1992 | A |
5172690 | Nappholz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172699 | Svenson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174286 | Chirife | Dec 1992 | A |
5184616 | Weiss | Feb 1993 | A |
5184620 | Cudahy et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5185620 | Cooper | Feb 1993 | A |
5188104 | Wernicke et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188106 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190036 | Linder | Mar 1993 | A |
5190041 | Palti | Mar 1993 | A |
5190141 | Boldrini et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199428 | Obel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5202095 | Houchin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205284 | Freeman | Apr 1993 | A |
5213098 | Bennett et al. | May 1993 | A |
5226429 | Kuzmak | Jul 1993 | A |
5231381 | Duwaer | Jul 1993 | A |
5231988 | Wernicke et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5233985 | Hudrlik | Aug 1993 | A |
5234454 | Bangs | Aug 1993 | A |
5236413 | Feiring | Aug 1993 | A |
5243980 | Mehra et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247938 | Silverstein et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263480 | Wernicke et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267560 | Cohen | Dec 1993 | A |
5281219 | Kallok | Jan 1994 | A |
5282785 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284491 | Sutton et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286254 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292344 | Douglas | Mar 1994 | A |
5305745 | Zacouto | Apr 1994 | A |
5314463 | Camps et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318591 | Causey, III et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320543 | Barton et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320642 | Scherlag | Jun 1994 | A |
5320643 | Roline et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324327 | Cohen | Jun 1994 | A |
5325856 | Nitzsche et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5327887 | Nowakowski | Jul 1994 | A |
5346506 | Mower et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350403 | Stroetmann et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353800 | Pohndorf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365461 | Stein et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366485 | Kroll et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366486 | Zipes et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368028 | Palti | Nov 1994 | A |
5368040 | Carney | Nov 1994 | A |
5370665 | Hudrlik | Dec 1994 | A |
5374787 | Miller et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381160 | Landmeier | Jan 1995 | A |
5386835 | Elphick et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5386837 | Sterzer | Feb 1995 | A |
5387419 | Levy et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391192 | Lu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391199 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1995 | A |
5397344 | Garfield et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5398683 | Edwards et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402151 | Duwaer | Mar 1995 | A |
5411531 | Hill et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415629 | Henley | May 1995 | A |
5417717 | Salo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419763 | Hildebrand | May 1995 | A |
5423872 | Cigaina | Jun 1995 | A |
5425363 | Wang | Jun 1995 | A |
5431682 | Hedberg | Jul 1995 | A |
5431688 | Freeman | Jul 1995 | A |
5431693 | Schroeppel | Jul 1995 | A |
5433730 | Alt | Jul 1995 | A |
5443485 | Housworth et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443489 | Ben-Haim | Aug 1995 | A |
5445609 | Lattin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447520 | Spano et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447525 | Powell et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447526 | Karsdon | Sep 1995 | A |
5449368 | Kuzmak | Sep 1995 | A |
5451751 | Takimoto et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458568 | Racchini et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464020 | Lerner | Nov 1995 | A |
5464429 | Hedberg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468254 | Hahn et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472453 | Alt | Dec 1995 | A |
5476484 | Hedberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5476485 | Weinberg et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476487 | Sholder | Dec 1995 | A |
5476497 | Mower et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480422 | Ben-haim | Jan 1996 | A |
5482052 | Lerner | Jan 1996 | A |
5489293 | Pless et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495077 | Miller et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499971 | Shapland et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501662 | Hofmann | Mar 1996 | A |
5505700 | Leone et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510813 | Makinwa et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514162 | Bornzin et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514175 | Kim et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520642 | Bigagli et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522853 | Kroll | Jun 1996 | A |
5527345 | Infinger | Jun 1996 | A |
5528002 | Katabami | Jun 1996 | A |
5531764 | Adams et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534015 | Kroll et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540722 | Clare et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540730 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540734 | Zabara | Jul 1996 | A |
5543589 | Buchana et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546951 | Ben-haim | Aug 1996 | A |
5549646 | Katz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551425 | Essen-Moller | Sep 1996 | A |
5552150 | Horrobin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556421 | Prutchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556760 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558640 | Pfeiler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561165 | Lautt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562708 | Combs et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562720 | Stern et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565632 | Ogawa | Oct 1996 | A |
5568809 | Ben-Haim | Oct 1996 | A |
5571143 | Hoegnelid et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571997 | Gray et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578061 | Stroetmann et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584804 | Klatz et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584868 | Salo et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587200 | Lorenz et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589856 | Stein et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601604 | Vincent | Feb 1997 | A |
5601609 | Duncan | Feb 1997 | A |
5601611 | Fayram et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5616268 | Carr | Apr 1997 | A |
5620468 | Mongeon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622687 | Krishnan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626622 | Cooper | May 1997 | A |
5632267 | Hoegnelid et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634895 | Igo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649966 | Noren et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651378 | Matheny et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654030 | Munshi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662687 | Hedberg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670755 | Kwon | Sep 1997 | A |
5674251 | Combs et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674259 | Gray | Oct 1997 | A |
5683429 | Mehra | Nov 1997 | A |
5683431 | Wang | Nov 1997 | A |
5687734 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690691 | Chen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694945 | Ben-haim | Dec 1997 | A |
5697953 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704368 | Asano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713924 | Min et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713929 | Hess et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713935 | Prutchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716385 | Mittal et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720768 | Verboven-Nelissen | Feb 1998 | A |
5727558 | Hakki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735876 | Kroll et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738096 | Ben-Haim | Apr 1998 | A |
5738105 | Kroll | Apr 1998 | A |
5741211 | Renirie et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741791 | Olsen | Apr 1998 | A |
5749906 | Kieval et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755740 | Nappholz | May 1998 | A |
5777607 | Koolen | Jul 1998 | A |
5779661 | Stephen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782876 | Flammang | Jul 1998 | A |
5782881 | Lu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783951 | Inoue et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790106 | Hirano et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790107 | Kasser et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792189 | Gray et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792198 | Nappholz | Aug 1998 | A |
5792208 | Gray | Aug 1998 | A |
5792210 | Wamubu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795304 | Sun et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797967 | KenKnight | Aug 1998 | A |
5800464 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5807234 | Bui et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807306 | Shapland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814079 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5824016 | Ekwall | Oct 1998 | A |
5825352 | Bisset et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836994 | Bourgeois | Nov 1998 | A |
5837006 | Ocel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841078 | Miller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854881 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861014 | Familoni | Jan 1999 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868141 | Ellias | Feb 1999 | A |
5871506 | Mower | Feb 1999 | A |
5906607 | Taylor et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911223 | Weaver et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913876 | Taylor et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914465 | Allen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919216 | Houben et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5920309 | Bisset et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925070 | King et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927284 | Borst et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938669 | Klaiber et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954761 | Machek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956020 | D'Amico et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961871 | Bible et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5962246 | Ladner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979449 | Steer | Nov 1999 | A |
5991649 | Garfield et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995872 | Bourgeois | Nov 1999 | A |
6002594 | Ledin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006134 | Hill et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023640 | Ross | Feb 2000 | A |
6026326 | Bardy | Feb 2000 | A |
6026626 | Fisher | Feb 2000 | A |
6032074 | Collins | Feb 2000 | A |
6032672 | Taylor | Mar 2000 | A |
6037882 | Levy | Mar 2000 | A |
6041252 | Walker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041258 | Cigaina et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057374 | Huntington et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066163 | John | May 2000 | A |
6067470 | Mower | May 2000 | A |
6067991 | Forsell | May 2000 | A |
6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075520 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083249 | Familoni | Jul 2000 | A |
6086582 | Altman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091992 | Bourgeois | Jul 2000 | A |
6092528 | Edwards | Jul 2000 | A |
6093167 | Houben et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096361 | Yamane et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104955 | Bourgeois | Aug 2000 | A |
6115635 | Bourgeois | Sep 2000 | A |
6122536 | Sun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128007 | Seybold et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129685 | Howard | Oct 2000 | A |
6132372 | Essen-Moller | Oct 2000 | A |
6133906 | Geaghan | Oct 2000 | A |
6135978 | Houben et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135987 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136019 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6141586 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6141587 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6151586 | Brown | Nov 2000 | A |
6178351 | Mower | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185452 | Schulman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216045 | Black et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233484 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233487 | Mika et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236887 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239389 | Allen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243607 | Mintchev et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249697 | Asano et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261280 | Houben et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278443 | Amro et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285906 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292693 | Darvish et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292704 | Malonek et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295470 | Mower | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296693 | McCarthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298254 | Tamada | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6298268 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317631 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330476 | Ben-Haim | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334073 | Levine | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337995 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341235 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343232 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363279 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363937 | Hovda et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381495 | Jenkins | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392636 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411842 | Cigaina et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411847 | Mower | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415178 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417846 | Lee | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424864 | Matsuura | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427089 | Knowlton | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433069 | Oeltjen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449511 | Mintchev et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452514 | Philipp | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453199 | Kobozev | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454699 | Forsell | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463323 | Conrad-Vlasak et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463324 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473069 | Gerpheide | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476766 | Cohen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498944 | Ben-haim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504530 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505745 | Anderson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507093 | Kaneda et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6535764 | Imran et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
RE38119 | Mower | May 2003 | E |
6558345 | Houben et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567700 | Turcott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570557 | Westerman et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571127 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572542 | Houben et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583676 | Krah et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584348 | Glukhovsky | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587093 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6587721 | Prutchi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591137 | Fischell et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594515 | Watson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600953 | Flesler et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605039 | Houben et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606523 | Jenkins | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609025 | Barrett et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611258 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612983 | Marchal | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630123 | Woltering et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633280 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634895 | Agro | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652444 | Ross | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658297 | Loeb | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667740 | Ely et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684104 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690156 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690963 | Ben-haim et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6735477 | Levine | May 2004 | B2 |
6745079 | King | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754536 | Swoyer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762752 | Perski et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6781577 | Shigetaka | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810286 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826428 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832114 | Whitehurst et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6852110 | Roy et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853862 | Marchal et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6869431 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876885 | Swoyer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6895279 | Loeb et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918906 | Long | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919205 | Brighton | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6939349 | Fleischman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947792 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949081 | Chance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952613 | Swoyer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993391 | Flesler et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006871 | Darvish et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7027863 | Prutchi et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7043295 | Starkebaum | May 2006 | B2 |
7054690 | Imran | May 2006 | B2 |
7062318 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076305 | Imran et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076306 | Marchal et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092753 | Darvish et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7120497 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7167748 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171263 | Darvish et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190997 | Darvish et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7218963 | Ben-haim et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221978 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7440806 | Whitehurst et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7460907 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7840262 | Mika et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7966071 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010011543 | Forsell | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020026141 | Houben et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032444 | Mische | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052632 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065455 | Ben-haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020081732 | Bowlin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103424 | Swoyer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123771 | Ideker et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161414 | Flesler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162836 | Taino et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183682 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183686 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018367 | DiLorenzo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028221 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040777 | Shemer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045919 | Swoyer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055464 | Darvish et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055465 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055466 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055467 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066536 | Forsell | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100889 | Duverger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030144708 | Starkebaum | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167476 | Conklin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181958 | Doubak, III | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188899 | Chao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195600 | Tronnes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208212 | Cigaina | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208242 | Harel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030211475 | Roberts | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220678 | Tronnes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040044376 | Flesler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059393 | Policker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088023 | Imran | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095333 | Morag et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105040 | Oh et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106954 | Whitehurst et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107004 | Levine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134904 | Clemen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138710 | Shemer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147816 | Policker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155871 | Perski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158138 | Kilcoyne et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158289 | Girouard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162469 | Imran | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162595 | Foley | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167583 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193184 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193229 | Starkebaum et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230273 | Cates et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232140 | Kanzaki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236316 | Danitz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243190 | Ben-Haim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243211 | Colliou et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249421 | Harel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050020965 | Vail | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021101 | Chen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033396 | Ospyka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055038 | Kelleher et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065505 | Ryan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065553 | Ben Ezra et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075654 | Kelleher | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090873 | Imran | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095227 | Rosenzweig et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107829 | Edwards et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143784 | Imran | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149142 | Starkebaum | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164925 | Jakubowski et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050183732 | Edwards | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192542 | Dev et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192615 | Torre et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203500 | Saadat et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209653 | Herbert et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222638 | Foley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036126 | Ross et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074459 | Flesler et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079475 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085045 | Harel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097991 | Hotelling et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142803 | Mintchev | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173238 | Starkebaum | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184207 | Darvish et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247718 | Starkebaum | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016262 | Gross et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027487 | Mika et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027490 | Ben-Haim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027493 | Ben-Haim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070051849 | Watts et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060812 | Harel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060971 | Glasberg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088393 | Ben-Haim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092446 | Haddad et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070156177 | Harel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161851 | Takizawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162079 | Shemer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171211 | Perski et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179556 | Ben-Haim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185540 | Ben-Haim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070239216 | Shemer et al. | Oct 2007 | A9 |
20070293901 | Rousso et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299320 | Policker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080046062 | Camps et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051849 | Ben-Haim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058879 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058889 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058891 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065159 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065163 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065164 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065168 | Bitton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077174 | Mische | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140142 | Darvish et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080178684 | Spehr | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188837 | Belsky et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090062893 | Spehr | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088816 | Harel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118797 | Kliger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131993 | Rousso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090204063 | Policker et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090281449 | Thrower et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292324 | Rousso et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100016923 | Rousso et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100228105 | Policker et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100305468 | Policker et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324644 | Levi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0057048 | Aug 1982 | EP |
0129483 | Dec 1984 | EP |
144705 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0148687 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0156593 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0250931 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0268379 | May 1988 | EP |
0314078 | May 1989 | EP |
0421780 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0481684 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0503839 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0528751 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0220916 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0727241 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0996482 | May 2000 | EP |
1036545 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1263498 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 447 052 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1447632 | Aug 2004 | EP |
0910429 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1515102 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1394171 | May 1975 | GB |
2033587 | May 1980 | GB |
2280377 | Feb 1995 | GB |
62-112530 | May 1987 | JP |
62-275471 | Nov 1987 | JP |
04-117967 | Apr 1992 | JP |
04-282168 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-365493 | Dec 1992 | JP |
06-169998 | Jun 1994 | JP |
06-193884 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06-506619 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06-310268 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07-503865 | Apr 1995 | JP |
07-126600 | May 1995 | JP |
07-144024 | Jun 1995 | JP |
07-508662 | Sep 1995 | JP |
08-064359 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08-243176 | Sep 1996 | JP |
09-229372 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2001-086967 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2003319945 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003319945 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2014844 | Jun 1994 | RU |
1827793 | May 1995 | RU |
2055606 | Mar 1996 | RU |
2075980 | Mar 1997 | RU |
2077273 | Apr 1997 | RU |
2078547 | May 1997 | RU |
2260451 | Oct 2001 | RU |
386634 | Oct 1973 | SU |
0386634 | Oct 1973 | SU |
0553977 | May 1977 | SU |
553977 | May 1977 | SU |
0709078 | Jan 1980 | SU |
0831131 | May 1981 | SU |
831131 | May 1981 | SU |
1039506 | Sep 1983 | SU |
1147408 | Mar 1985 | SU |
WO 9119534 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9200716 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9213592 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9302743 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9302745 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9308874 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9318820 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9401172 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO 9417855 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9502995 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9508316 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9605768 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 9610358 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9616696 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9715227 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9706849 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 9724981 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9724983 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9725098 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9725101 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9726042 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9727900 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9729679 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729682 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729684 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729700 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729701 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729709 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9810828 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810829 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810830 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810831 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810832 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9811840 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9815317 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9819719 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9856378 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9857701 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9903533 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9906105 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9909971 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9955360 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9924110 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9929307 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9959548 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0001443 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004947 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0016741 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0027475 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0042914 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0012525 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0053257 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0061223 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0074773 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0110375 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0124871 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0141671 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0149367 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0152931 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0166183 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0183019 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0191854 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0193950 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0193951 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0210791 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0223953 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02053093 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02082968 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02089655 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03020365 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03045493 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004021858 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004021858 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043280 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004066903 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004069330 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004070396 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080533 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004091361 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004096337 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112563 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112883 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005007232 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005007237 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005009288 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005016181 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005023081 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005037152 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005041749 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005087310 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106333 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005114369 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006018851 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006035446 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006073671 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006087712 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006087717 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006097934 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006097935 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006102626 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006129321 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006118790 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006119467 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007080595 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007091255 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007096877 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007096878 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008007368 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008117296 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008139463 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2011092710 | Aug 2011 | WO |
9706341 | Feb 1998 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Yamada, “Effects of drugs on electromechanical activities of the stomach and duodenum of conscious dogs”, Nippon Heikatsukin Gakkai Zasshi. Feb. 1983;19(1):25-35. (abstract only). |
Shemerovskii KA, “Effect of feeding on the activity of duodenal smooth muscle in dogs”, Biull Eksp Biol Med. Oct. 1978;86(10):394-7. (Abstract only). |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Jaremko, et al., “Advances toward the implantable artificial pancreas for treatment of diabetes”, Diabetes Care, 21(3), Mar. 1998. |
Lamb F.S. et al., “Cyclosporine augments reactivity of isolated blood vessels”, Life Sciences, 40, pp. 2571-2578, 1987. |
Johansson B. et al., “Static and dynamic components in the vascular myogenic response to passive changes in length as revealed by electrical and mechanical recordings from the rat portal vein”, Circulation Research, 36, pp. 76-83, 1975. |
Zelcer E. et al., “Spontaneous electrical activity in pressurized small mesenteric arteries”, Blood Vessels, 19, pp. 301-310, 1982. |
Schobel H.P. et al., “Preeclampsia—a state of sympathetic overactivity”, New England Journal of Medicine, 335, pp. 148-1485, 1996. |
Rosenpire A.J. et al., “Pulsed DC Electric Fields Couple to Natural NAD(P)H Oscillations in HT-1080 Fibrosarcoma Cells”, Journal of Cell Science, 114(Pt. 8), pp. 1515-1520, Apr. 2001. |
Gomis A. et al., “Oscillatory patterns of electrical activity in mouse pancreatic islets of Langerhans recorded in vivo”, Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, Abstract vol. 432(3), pp. 510-515, 1996. |
Soria B. et al., “Cytosolic calcium oscillations and insulin release in pancreatic islets of Langerhans”, Diabetes Metab., 24(1), pp. 37-40, Feb. 1998. |
Magnus G. et al., “Model of Beta-cell mitochondrial calcium handling and electrical activity. II. Mitochondrial variables”, American Journal of Physiology, 274(4 Pt 1): C1174-1184, Apr. 1998. |
Gut R. et al., “High-precision EMG signal decomposition using communication techniques”, IEEE transactions on signal processing, 48(9), pp. 2487-2494, Sep. 2000. |
Nadal A. et al., “Homologous and heterologous asynchronicity between identified alpha-, beta-, and delta-cells within intact islets of Langerhans in the mouse”, Journal of Physiology, 517(Pt. 1), pp. 85-93, May 1999. |
M D Robertson, et al, “The influence of the colon on postprandial glucagons-like peptide 1 (7-36) amide concentration in man”, Journal of Endocrinology (1999) 161, 25-31. |
J Schirra, et al, “Mechanisms of the antidiabetic action of subcutaneous glucagons-like peptide-1 (7-36) amide in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus”, Journal of Endocrinology (1998) 156, 177-186. |
T Vilsboll and Associates, Research design and methods, Diabetes, vol. 50, Mar. 2001, pp. 610-613. |
Jeannie F. Todd, et al, “Subcutaneous glucagons-like peptide-1 improves postprandial glycaemic control over 3-week period in patients with early type 2 diabetes”, Clinical Science (1998) 95, 325-329. |
Daniel J. Drucker, “Development of glucagon-like peptide-1-based pharmaceuticals as therapeutic agents for the treatment of diabetes”, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2001, 7, 1399-1412. |
Meda et al., Quarterly J. Exper. Physiol. 69:719-735 (1984). |
Eddiestone et al., J. Membrane Biol. 77:1-141 (1984). |
Adeghate et al. “Effect of Electrical Field Stimulation on Insulin and Glucagon Secretion From the Pancreas of Normal and Diabetic Rats”, Hormone and Metabolic Research, 33(5): 281-289, May 2001. Abstract. |
Antoni et al. “Polarization Effects of Sinusoidal 50-Cycle Alternating Current on Membrane Potential of Mammalian Cardiac Fibres”, Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 314(4): 274-291, 1970. Abstract. |
Bergsten et al. “Synchronous Oscillations of Cytoplasmic Ca2+ and Insulin Release in Glucose-Stimulated Pancreatic Islets”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269(12): 8749-8753, Mar. 25, 1994. |
Borst et al.“Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Without Cardiopulomonary Bypass and Without Interuption of Native Coronary Flow Using a Novel Anastomosis Site Restraining Device (Octupus)”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 27(6): 1356-1364, 1996. |
Burfeind et al “The Effects of Mechanical Cardiac Stabilization on Left Ventricular Performance”, Europeari Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 14: 285-289, 1998. |
Cazeau et al. “Multisite Pacing for End-Stage Heart Failure: Early Experience”, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 19(11): 1748-1757, 1996, Abstract. |
Devedeux et al.“Uterine Electromyography: A Critical Review”, American Journal of Obstetric Gynecology, 169(6): 1636-1653, 1993. |
Dillion “Synchronized Repolarization After Defibrillation Shocks. A Possible Component of the Defibrillation Process Demonstration by Optical Recordings in Rabbit Heart”, Circulation, 85(5): 1865-1878, 1992. |
Erol-Yilmaz et al.“Reversed Remodelling of Dilated Left Sided Cardiomyopathy After Upgrading from VVIR to VVIR Biventricular Pacing”, Europace, 4: 445-449, 2002. |
Fromer et al. “Ultrarapid Subthreshold Stimulation for Termination of Atriventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia”, Journal of the American College Cardiology, 20: 879-883, 1992. |
Gilmour Jr. et al. “Dynamics of Circus Movement Re-Entry Across Canine Purkinje Fibre-Muscle Junctions”, The Journal of Physiology, 476(3): 473-485, 1994. |
Gold et al. “Evidence That Glucose ‘Marks’ Beta Cells Resulting in Preferential Release of Newly Synthesized Insulin”, Science, 218(4567): 56-58, Oct. 1, 1982. Abstract. |
Gomis et al. “Oscillatory Patterns of Electrical Activity in Mouse PancreaticIslets of Langerhans Recorded in Vivo”, PflÜgers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 432(3): 510-515, 1996. |
Gussoni et al. “Dystrophin Expression in the MDX Mouse Restored by Stem Cell Transplantation”, Nature, 401(6751): 390-394, 1999. |
Hinke et al. “Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPIV/CD26) Degradation of Glucagon. Characterization of Glucagon Degradation Products and DPIV-Resistant Analogs”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(6): 3827-3834, Feb. 11, 2000. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Control of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. I. Insulin and Glucagon Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Vagus Nerves”, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111(1): 1-7, Jan. 1981. Abstract. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Control of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. II. The Effect of Pharmacological Blocking Agents on the Response to Vagal Stimulation”, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111(1): 9-14, 1981. Abstract. |
Horner et al. “Electrode for Recording Direction of Activation, Conduction Velocity and Monophasic Action Potential of Myocardium”, American Journal of Physiology, 272(4): H1917-H1927, 1997. Abstract. |
Jaremko et al. “Advances Towards the Implantable Artifical Pancreas for Treatment of Diabetes”, Diabetes Care, 21(3): 444-450, 1998. |
Knisley et al “Effect of Field Stimulation on Cellular Repolarization in Rabbit Myocardium. Implications for Reentry Induction”, Circulation Research, 70(4): 707-715, Apr. 1992. |
Kurose et al. “Glucagon, Insulin and Somatostatin Secretion in Response to Sympathetic Neural Activation in Streptozotocin—Induced Diabetic Rats. A Study With the Isolated Perfused Rat Pancreas In Vitro”, Diabetologia, 35(11): 1035-1041, Nov. 1992. Abstract. |
Lindström et al. “Intracellular Calcium Oscillations in A T-Cell Line After Exposure to Extremely-Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields with Variable Frequencies and Flux Densities”, Bioelectromagnetics, 16(1): 41-47, 1995, Abstract. |
Loginov “Accumulation of Calcium Ions in Myocardial Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of Restrained Rats Exposed to the . . . ”, Aviakosm. Ekolog. Med., 26: 49-51, 1992. |
Luiken et al. “Contraction-Induced Fatty Acid Translocase/CD36 Translocation in Rat Cardiac Myocytes is Mediated Through AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling”, Diabetes, 52: 1627-1634, 2003. |
Magnus et al. “Model of β-Cell Mitochondrial Calcium Handling and Electrical Activity. II. Mitochondrial Variables”, American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology, 274(43): C1174-C1184, 1998. |
Misler et al. “Electrophysiology of Stimulus-Secretion Coupling in Human Beta-Cells”, Diabetes, 41(10): 1221-1228, Oct. 1992. Abstract. |
Nadal et al. “Homologous and Heterologous Asynchronicity Between Identified α-, β- and δ- Cells Within Intact Islets of Langerhans in the Mouse”, Journal of Physicology, 517(Pt.1): 85-93, 1999. |
Ohinata et al. “Proadrenomedullin N-Terminal 20 Peptide (PAMP) Elevates Blood Glucose Levels Via Bombesin Receptor in Mice”, FEBS Letters, 473(2): 207-211, May 2000. Abstract. |
Palti et al. “Islets of Langerhans Generate Wavelike Electric Activity Modulated by Glucose Concentration”, Diabetes, 45(5): 595-601, May 1996. Abstract. |
Patterson et al. “Therapeutic Angiogenesis: The New Electrophysiology?”, Circulation, 99(20): 2614-2616, 1999. |
Pokrovsky et al. “Physiology of Man”, 1: 82-83, 94, 2: 42, 54. |
Pørksen et al. “Section 6: Pulsatile and Phasic Insulin Release in Normal and Diabetic Man. Pulsatile Insulin Secretion: Detection, Regulation, and Role in Diabetes”, Diabetes, 51(Suppl.1): S245-S254, Feb. 2002. |
Rivera et al. “Regulation of Protein Secretion Through Controlled Aggregation in the Endoplasmic Reticulum”, Science, 287(5454): 826-830, Feb. 4, 2000. Abstract. |
Sakuma et al. “A Model Analysis of Aftereffects of High-Intensity DC Stimulation on Action Potential of Ventricular Muscle”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 45(2): 258-267, 1998, Abstract. |
Schirra et al. “Mechanisms of the Antidiabetic Action of Subcutaneous Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (17-36) Amide In Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus”, Journal of Endocrinology Ltd., 156(1): 177-186, Jan. 1998. Abstract. |
Schirra et al. “Exendin(9-39) Amide Is An Antagonist of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1(7-36) Amide in Humans”, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 101(7): 1421-1430, Apr. 1998. |
Serre et al. “Exendin-(9-39) Is An Inverse Agonist of the Murine Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor: Implications for Basal Intracellular Cyclic Adenosine 3′,5′-Monophosphate Levels and β-Cells Glucose Competence”, Endocrinology, 139(11): 4448-4454, 1998. |
Shah et al. “Impact of Lack of Suppression of Glucagon on Glucose Tolerance in Humans”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Endocrinology and Metabolism, 277(2 Pt.1): E283-E290, 1999. |
Shmit et al. “Physiology of Man”, Moscow Medicine, Mir, 1: 78, 1996. |
Shuba et al.“Physiology of Vessel Smooth Muscles”, Kiev Naukova Dumka, 142: 11-15, 142, 1988. |
Soria et al. “Cytosolic Calcium Oscillations and Insulin Release in Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans”, Diabetes & Metabolism, 24: 37-40, 1998. |
Sweeny et al.“Countershock Strength-Duration Relationship for Myocardial Refractory Period Extension”, Academic Emergency Medicine, 2(1): 57-62, 1995, Abstract. |
Sweeny et al “Ventricular Refractory Period Extension Caused by Defibrillation Shocks”, Circulation, 82(3): 965-972, 1990. |
Swerdlow et al. “Cardiovascular Collapse Caused by Electrocardiographically Silent 60-Hz Intracardiac Leakage Current: Implications for Electrical Safety”, Circulation, 99: 2559-2564, 1999. |
Todd et al. “Subcutaneous Glucagon-Like Peptide I Improves Postprandial Glycaemic Control Over A 3-Week Period in Patients With Early Type 2 Diabetes”, Clinical Science, 95: 325-329, 1998. |
Valdeolmillos et al. “In Vivo Synchronous Membrane Potential Oscillations in Mouse Pancreatic Beta-Cells: Lack of Co-Ordination Between Islets”, Journal of Physiology, 493(1): 9-18, 1996. |
Van Riper et al. “Electrical Field Stimulation-Mediated Relaxation of A Rabbit Middle Cerebral Artery. Evidence of A Cholinergic Endothelium-Dependent Component”, Circulation Research, 70(6): 1104-1112, Jun. 1992. |
Wang et al. “Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Tonally Inhibits β-, α-, and δ- Cell Secretion in Isolated Rat Pancreatic Islets”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Endocrinology and Metabolism, 276(1 Pt.1): E19-E24, 1999. |
Xue et al. “Neural-Network-Based Adaptive Matched Filtering for QRS Detection”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 39(4): 317-329, 1992. Abstract. |
Yonemura et al. “Amelioration of Diabetes Mellitus in Partially Depancreatized Rats by Poly(ADP-Ribose) Synthetase Inhibitors. Evidence of Islet B-Cell Regeneration”, Diabetes, 33(4): 401-404, Apr. 1984. Abstract. |
Zipes “Cardiac Electrophysiology—From Cell to Bedside”, Saunders Co., 4th Ed., 1990. |
Amended Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631 Dated Aug. 20, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 5, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—Amendment in Response to Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008, Filed Aug. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—IDS Dated Dec. 31, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—IDS Dated Sep. 26, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887—Official Action and IDS Considered Dated Jun. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,298,268 Order Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Dated Dec. 19, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of Patent No. 6,363,279—IDS Submitted Dec. 31, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of Patent No. 6,363,279—Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate Dated Mar. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of Patent No. 6,363,279—Order Granting Request Dated Nov. 5, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of Patent No. 6,363,279—Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Response Dated May 4, 2009 to Official Action of Nov. 3, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Office Action Dated Jul. 13, 2009 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480027083.3 and Its Translation Into English. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 2, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 14, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 28, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 28, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
CN—Chinese Appln. No. 2004-80027283.3—Office Action issued by CPO dated Jul. 13, 2009. |
Translation of Notification of Reason for Refusal Dated Feb. 1, 2011 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-520981. |
Translation of Notification of Reason for Refusal Dated Apr. 13, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-520981. |
Examination Report Dated Aug. 23, 2007 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re. Application No. 212/MUMNP/2006. |
Second Examination Report Dated May 30, 2008 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re. Application No. 212/MUMNP/2006. |
Office Action Dated May 26, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480027293.3 and Its Translation into English. |
Supplementary European Search Report Dated Aug. 5, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 04745004. |
Response Dated Jan. 6, 2010 to Official Action of Jun. 26, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,812. |
Response Dated Jun. 8, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 8, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Response Dated Dec. 10, 2009 to Official Action of Sep. 15, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Response Dated Apr. 12, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 11, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,881. |
Response Dated Jun. 20, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 8, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Response Dated Apr. 23, 2010 to Official Action of Feb. 23, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,963. |
Response Dated Nov. 29, 2010 to Official Action of Jun. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,963. |
Supplemental Response Dated Jun. 29, 2010 to Official Action of Jun. 22, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183 and Response Dated Jun. 8, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 8, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Response Dated May 10, 2011 to Notice of Allowance of Feb. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,963. |
JPO Office Action issued Feb. 1, 2011 for JP Appln. No. 2006-520981 (3 Pgs.). |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 31, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,943. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 27, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability Dated Jul. 13, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Notice of Allowability Dated Jul. 13, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jul. 16, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jul. 18, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 3, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,943. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688, filed Jun. 15, 2007, Ben Haim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689, Ben Haim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707, filed Jun. 7, 2007, Ben Haim. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032, Ben Haim. |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of An Appeal Brief Dated Mar. 22, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Mar. 2, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05853465.2. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 11, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 99931435.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 26, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 06759102.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 26, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05853465.2. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jan. 29, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 04106247.2. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC Dated Mar. 2, 2007 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 97929478.2. |
Communication to Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Mar. 4, 2009 From the European Search Report Re.: Application No. 06759102.4. |
Inter Partes Reexamination Communication of Patent US 6,330,476 Dated Sep. 4, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Nov. 15, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. PCT/US2006/017281. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Jun. 21, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. Jun. 21, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Sep. 27, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. PCT/IL2006/000345. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion Dated May 12, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/US05/44557. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion Dated Oct. 16, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/US06/17281. |
Invitation Pursuant to Rule 62a(1) EPC and Rule 63(1) EPC Dated May 5, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 04719312.3. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jan. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 15, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 16, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jun. 20, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jun. 27, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Dec. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Jun. 1, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Dec. 12, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/792,811. |
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Dated Jul. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Office Action Dated Jan. 8, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Oct. 12, 2004 From the Israeli Patent Office Re.: Application No. 128955. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 15, 2008 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Jan. 18, 2012 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 25, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5 and Its Translation Into English. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 3, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 4, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 4, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 5, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 6, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 6, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 6, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 6, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 8, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 9, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 10, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 11, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 11, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,064. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 11, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 11, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated May 12, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 12, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 13, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated May 13, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 13, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 14, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,943. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 15, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 15, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 17, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 17, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 18, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 18, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 20, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/039,845. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 21, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 21, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/802,685. |
Official Action Dated May 21, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated May 21, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,201. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 22, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/886,154. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 23, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 23, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/549,216. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 24, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/919,491. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 26, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,794. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 28, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 28, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 28, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,889. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 29, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 29, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 30, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 30, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,149. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 30, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 09/980,748. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 31, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/536,794. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 31, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 31, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/673,812. |
Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review Dated Aug. 9, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,168. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of Patent No. 6,363,279 Dated Jun. 8, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of Patent No. 6,363,279, Response to Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008 Submitted Aug. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,688. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887—IDS Submitted Oct. 17, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887—IDS Submitted Sep. 29, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887—Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Examination Certificate Dated Mar. 19, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Pante Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887—Official Action and IDS Considered Dated Jun. 20, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887—Official Action Granting Request for Ex Parte Examination Dated Aug. 17, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,236,887 Dated Jun. 13, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,707. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,298,268—Certificate of Reexamination Issued Mar. 7, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,298,268—IDS Considered Feb. 22, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,298,268—Notice of Intent to Issue Certificate of Reexamination Dated Mar. 29, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,298,268 Dated Oct. 10, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent. No. 6,298,268 Order Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination Dated Dec. 19, 2003, U.S. Appl. No. 90/006,788. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—Notice of Intent to Issue Certificate of Reexamination Dated Mar. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—Official Action Dated Jun. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—Order Granting Reexamination Dated Nov. 5, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,317,631—IDS Dated Jun. 8, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,689. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476—IDS Dated May 31, 2006. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476—Comments by 3rd Party Requestor, Response Thereto and Official Action Issued Jul. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476—Communication of Right to Appeal dated Jul. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476—IDS Filed May 4, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476—Official Action by USPTO Issued Mar. 23, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476—Order Granting Request for Reexamination Dated Mar. 23, 2004 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,330,476 Dated Dec. 31, 2003 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,032. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,463,324—Amendment in Response to Official Action Dated Aug. 1, 2007 Filed Oct. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,463,324—Certificate of Reexamination Dated Apr. 29, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,463,324—Official Action—Notice of Intent to Reexamine Dated Jan. 24, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,463,324—Official Action Dated Aug. 1, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,463,324—Official Action, Interview Summary and References Considered Dated Nov. 6, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,463,324 Dated Nov. 1, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 90/008,312. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC Dated Dec. 22, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 97929480.8. |
Supplemental Response Dated Apr. 18, 2011 to Response of Apr. 10, 2011 to Official Action of Jan. 6, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,724. |
Supplementary European Search Report and the European Search Opinion Dated Nov. 28, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 006759102.4. |
Supplementary European Search Report and the European Search Opinion Dated Nov. 28, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05853465.2. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report Dated Nov. 4, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 04719312.3. |
Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection Dated Jul. 18, 2006 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 09-529637. |
Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection Dated Apr. 27, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2007-206282. |
Translation of Office Action Dated Aug. 3, 2011 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. |
Translation of Office Action Dated Apr. 20, 2011 From the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480012687.5. |
USPTO Public Print Out of Interference File Content of Interference Dated Apr. 4, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. Interference No. 105,765. |
USPTO Public Print Out of Interference File Content of Interference Dated Apr. 4, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. Interference No. 105,768. |
Blank et al. “Initial Interactions in Electromagnetic Field-Induced Biosynthesis”, Journal of Cellular Physiology, 199: 359-363, 2004. |
Gardner “Natriuretic Peptides: Markers or Modulators of Cardiac Hypertrophy?”, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 14(9): 411-416, Nov. 2003. |
Gilmour Jr. et al. “Overdrive Suppression of Conduction at the Canine Purkinje-Muscle Junction”, Circulation, 76(6): 1388-1396, 1987. |
Hammond et al. “Motor Innervation of the Cricopharyngeus Muscle by the Recurrent Lanryngeal Nerve”, Journal of Applied Physiology, JAP, 83: 89-94, 1997. |
Highfill et al. “Large-Scale Production of Murine Bone Marrow Cells in an Airlift Packed Bed Bioreactor”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 50(5): 514-520, 1996. |
Meurer et al. “Properties of Native and in Vitro Glycosylated Forms of the Glucogan-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Antagonist Exendin(9-39)”, Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, 48(6): 716-724, Jun. 1999. Abstract. |
San Mauro et al. “Nerves of the Heart: A Comprehensive Review With A Clinical Point of View”, Neuroanatomy, 8: 28-31, 2009. |
Sukhorukov et al. “The Effect of Electrical Deformation Forces on the Electropermeabilization of Erythrocyte Membranes in Low-and High-Conductivity Media”, The Journal of Membrane Biology, 163(3): 235-245, 1998. Abstract. |
Sutton et al. “The Foundation of Cardiac Pacing, Part I: An Illustrated Practical Guide to Basic Pacing”, The Bakken Research Center Series, Chap.4: 50-59, 1991. |
Sutton et al. “What Is A Pacemaker?”, The Foundations of Cardiac Pacing, Part I: An Illustrated Practical Guide to Basic Pacing, Chap.4.5: 73-74, 1991. |
Webster “Electrodes, Leads, and Biocompatibility”, Design of Cardiac Pacemakers, IEEE Press, p. 141-144, 1995. |
Wright et al. “Structure of Fab hGR-2 F6, A Competitive Antagonist of the Glucagon Receptor”, Acta Crystallographica, Section D, Biological Crystallography, 56(Pt.5): 573-580, May 2000. Abstract. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Jul. 11, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/550,560. |
International Search Report and The Written Opinion Dated Sep. 2, 2011 From the International Searching Authority Re. Application No. PCT/IL 11/00116. |
Office Action Dated May 10, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/599,015. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 12, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/573,722. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 30, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,616. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Oct. 10, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jan. 27, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jan. 28, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 03794043.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Aug. 30, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC Dated Oct. 12, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 06711186.4. |
European Search Report and the European Search Opinion Dated Jul. 27, 2007 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Examination Report Dated Mar. 13, 2012 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 2988/CHENP/2007. |
Examination Report Dated May 18, 2011 From the Government of India, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building Re. Application No. 2988/CHENP/2007. |
Examination Report Dated Jun. 26, 2009 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 1161/CHENP/2006. |
Examination Report Dated Nov. 30, 2010 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re. Application No. 212/MUMNP/2006. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Dec. 1, 2004 From the International Preliminary Examining Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL03/00736. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability Dated Aug. 30, 2007 From the International Bureau of WIPO Re.: Application No. PCT/IL2006/000204. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion Dated Sep. 29, 2006 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL06/00204. |
International Search Report Dated Sep. 13, 2004 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL03/00736. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Sep. 7, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Notice of Allowance Dated May 11, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Nov. 29, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 31, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Notification of Reasons of Rejection Dated Sep. 29, 2008 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2004-534013 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 4, 2009 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 03824661.9 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 7, 2008 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 03824661.9 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated May 8, 2009 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 03824661.9 and Its Translation Into English. |
Office Action Dated Apr. 13, 2010 From the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re. Application No. 200480027293.3 and Its Translation into English. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 1, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 4, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 4, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated May 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 6, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 8, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 8, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 8, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 9, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 9, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 10, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated May 11, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 11, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 13, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 13, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 14, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 14, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 15, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 16, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 16, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 18, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 19, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 19, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Jan. 21, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 24, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 24, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 25, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 25, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action Dated May 26, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Apr. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 27, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Oct. 30, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 12/160,616. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 31, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 31, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Aug. 1, 2010 to Notification of Reasons of Rejection of Apr. 12, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-525265. |
Response Dated Aug. 2, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 31, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Mar. 3, 2010 to Official Action of Sep. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated May 3, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 3, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Response Dated Feb. 4, 2010 to Official Action of Dec. 4, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Response Dated Jan. 5, 2010 to Official Action of Oct. 8, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 11/566,775. |
Response Dated Oct. 5, 2010 to Official Action of May 5, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Response Dated Jun. 6, 2011 to Official Action of Jan. 4, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Response Dated May 7, 2007 to Examination Report of Mar. 2, 2007 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 533/CHENP/2005. |
Response Dated Feb. 8, 2010 to Official Action Dated Oct. 1, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Oct. 10, 2011 to Official Action Dated May 11, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated Dec. 12, 2011 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC of Oct. 10, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Response Dated May 16, 2011 to Official Action of Dec. 14, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Response Dated Feb. 18, 2010 to Official Action of Aug. 18, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Response Dated Aug. 24, 2010 to the Supplementary European Search Report of Jun. 7, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 04770468.9. |
Response Dated Feb. 24, 2011 to Notice of Allowance of Nov. 29, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Response Dated Jan. 25, 2007 to Examination Report of Jul. 7, 2006 From the Government of India, Patent Office Re.: Application No. 533/CHENP/2005. |
Response Dated Mar. 25, 2010 to Official Action of Sep. 25, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Response Dated Aug. 26, 2010 to Official Action of May 26, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/318,845. |
Response Dated Aug. 26, 2011 to the Summons to Oral Proceedings of Jul. 4, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 03794043.4. |
Response Dated Jul. 26, 2010 to Official Action of Mar. 25, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated Jan. 27, 2011 to Official Action of Sep. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Response Dated Jul. 27, 2010 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC of Jan. 27, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 07110023.4. |
Response Dated Sep. 27, 2010 to Official Action of Apr. 27, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Response Dated Aug. 28, 2011 to Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC of Jul. 4, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 03794043.4. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC Dated Jul. 4, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 03794043.4. |
Supplemental Response Dated Mar. 28, 2010 After an Interview of Mar. 4, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re. U.S. Appl. No. 10/237,263. |
Supplementary European Search Report and the European Search Opinion Dated Sep. 25, 2012 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 06711186.4. |
Supplementary European Search Report Dated Jun. 7, 2010 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 04770468.9. |
Supplementary European Search Report Dated Jan. 12, 2011 From the European Patent Office Re. Application No. 05718889.8. |
Supplementary Notice of Allowability Dated Nov. 22, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Translation of Decision of Rejection Dated Apr. 22, 2009 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2004-534013. |
Translation of Notification of Reasons of Rejection Dated Apr. 12, 2010 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-525265. |
Translation of Office Action Dated Sep. 12, 2008 From the State intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Re.: Application No. 200480032636.9. |
Antman et al. “Treatment of 150 Cases of Life-Threatening Digitalis Intoxication With Digoxin-Specific Fab Antibody Fragments”, Circulation, 81(6): 1744-1752, 1990. |
Antoni et al. “Polarization Effects of Sinusoidal 50-Cycle Alternating Current on Membrane Potential of Mammalian Cardiac Fibres”, Pflueger's Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 314(4): 274-291, 1970. Abstract. |
Bakker et al. “Beneficial Effects of Biventricular Pacing of Congestive Heart Failure”, Pace, 17(Part II): 318, 1994. |
Bargheer et al. “Prolongation of Monophasic Action Potential Duration and the Refractory Period in the Human Heart by Tedisamil, A New Potassium-Blocking Agent”, Journal European Heart, 15(10): 1409-1414, 1994, Abstract. |
Bers “Excitation Contraction Coupllng and Cardiac Contractile Force”, Internal Medicine, 237(2): 17, 1991, Abstract. |
Borst et al. “Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Without Cardiopulomonary Bypass and Without Interuption of Native Coronary Flow Using A Novel Anastomosis Site Restraining Device (Octupus)”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 27(6): 1356-1364, 1996. Abstract only! |
Bouaziz et al. “Direct Electrical Stimulation of Insulin Secretion by Intact Murine Islets of Langerhans Through the Culture Support”, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 17(2): 171-184, 1998. Abstract. |
Bronzino “Biomedical Engineering Handbook”, IEEE Press/CRC Press, Chap. 82.5: 1288, 1995. |
Cano et al. “Dose-Dependent Reversal of Dixogin-Inhibited Activity of An In-Vitro Na+K+ATPase Model by Digoxin-Specific Antibody”, Toxicology Letters, 85(2): 107-1011, 1996. |
Cazeau et al. “Multisite Pacing for End-Stage Heart Failure: Early Experience”, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 19(11/Pt.2): 1748-1757, 1996. Abstract. |
Cheng et al. “Calcium Sparks: Elementary Events Underlying Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Heart Muscle”, Science, 262(5134): 740-744, 1993. Abstract. |
Cooper “Postextrasystolic Potention. Do We Really Know What It Means and How to Use It?”, Circulation, 88: 2962-2971, 1993. |
Coulton et al. “Magnetic Fields and Intracellular Calcium; Effects on Lymphocytes Exposed to Conditions for ‘Cyclotron Resonance’”, Phys. Med. Biol., 38: 347-360, 1993, Abstract. |
Dillion “Optial Recordings in the Rabbit Heart Show That Defibrillation Strength Shocks Prolong the Duration of Depolarization and the Refractory Period”, Circulation Research, 69: 842-856, 1991. |
Dillon “Synchronized Repolarization After Defibrillation Shocks. A Possible Component of the Defibrillation Process Demonstration by Optical Recordings in Rabbit Heart”, Circulation, 85(5): 1865-1878, 1992. |
Fain et al. “Improved Internal Defibrillation Efficacy With a Biphasic Waveform”, American Heart Journal, 117(2): 358-364, 1989, Abstract. |
Fleg et al. “Impact of Age on the Cardiovasvular Response to Dynamic Upright Exercise in Healthy Men and Women”, Journal of Applied Physiologyl, 78: 890-900, 1995, Abstract. |
Fleischhauer et al. “Electrical Resistances of Interstitial and Microvascular Space as Determinants of the Extracellular Electrical Field and Velocity of Propagation in Ventricular Myocardium”, Circulation, 92: 587-594, 1995. |
Foster et al. “Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Atrio—Biventricular Padng in Humans”, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, 59: 294-300, 1995, Abstract. |
Franz “Bridging the Gap Between Basic Clinical Electrophysiology: What Can Be Learned From Monophasic Action Potential Recordings?”, Journal Cardiovasc Electrophysiology, 5(8): 699-710, 1994, Abstract. |
Franz “Method and Theory of Monophasic Action Potential Recording”, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 33(6): 347-368, 1991. Abstract. |
Fu et al. “System Identification of Electrically Coupled Smooth Music Cells: The Passive Electrically Coupled Smooth Muscle Cells: The Passive Electrical Properties”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38(11): 1130-1140, 1991. |
Gill et al. “Refractory Period Extension During Ventricular Pacing at Fibrillatory Pacing Rates”, Pacing and Clinical Elctrophysiology, 20(3): 647-653, 1997, Abstract. |
Ham et al. “Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias Using Fuzzy Artmap”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43(4): 425-429, 1996, Abstract. |
Hoffman et al. “Effects of Postextrasystolic Potentiation on Normal and Failing Hearts”, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 41(5): 498-534, 1965. |
Josephson “Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpertations”, Lea & Febiger, 2nd Ed., 2 P., 1991. |
King et al. “The Inotropic Action of Paired Pulse Stimulation in the Normal and Failing Heart: An Experimental Study”, Cardiovascular Research, 2: 122-129, 1968. |
Knisley et al. “Effect of Field Stimulation on Cellular Repolarization in Rabbit Myocardium. Implications for Reentry Induction”, Circulation Research, 70(4): 707-715, Apr. 1992. |
Knisley et al. “Prolongation and Shortening of Action Potentials by Electrical Shocks in Frog Ventricular Muscle”, American Journal of Physiology, 266(6): H2348-H2358, 1994, Abstract. |
Koller et al. “Relation Between Repolarization and Refractoriness During Programmed Electrical Stimulation in the Human Right Ventricle”, Circulation, 91(9): 2378-2384, 1995, Abstract. |
Langberg et al. “Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia With Use of the Morphology of the Endocardial Electrogram”, Circulation, 77(6): 1363-1369, 1988. |
Lindstroem et al. “Intracellular Calcium Oscillations in A T-Cell Line After Exposure to Extremely-Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields With Variable Frequencies and Flux Densities”, Bioelectromagnetics, 16(1): 41-47, 1995. Abstract. |
Loginov et al. “Effects of an Impulse Electromagnetic Field on Calcium Ion Accumulation in the Sarcoplasmic . . . ”, Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med., 15: 51-53, 1991. |
Lubart et al. “Effect of Light on Calcium Transport in Bull Sperm Cells”, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, Biology, 15(4): 337-341, Sep. 15, 1992. Abstract. |
Matheny et al. “Vagus Nerve Stimulation as A Method to Temporarily Slow or Arrest the Heart”, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 63(6): S28-29, 1997, Abstract. |
McVeigh et al. “Noninvasive Measurement of Transmural Gradients in Myocardial Strain With MR Imaging”, Radiology, 180(3): 677, 679-684, 1991. |
Mercando et al. “Automated Detection of Tachycardias by Antitachycardia Devices”, Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, Chap.100: 943-948, 2004. |
Moran et al. “Digoxin-Specific Fab Fragments Impair Renal Function in the Rat”, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 46(10): 854-856, 1994, Abstract. |
Morse et al. “A Guide to Cardiac Pacemakers, Defibrillators and Related Products”, Droege Computing Services, Inc., vol. I, Nov. 19, 1996. |
Nannini et al. “Muscle Recruitment With Intrafascicular Electrodes”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38: 769-776, 1991, Abstract. |
Paul et al. “Automatic Recognition of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Temporal Electrogram Analysis”, PACE, 14: 1265-1273, 1991. |
Pumir et al. “Control of Rotating Waves in Cardiac Muscle: Analysis of the Effect of Electric Fields”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 257(1349): 129-134, 1994. Abstract. |
Ranjan et al. “Electrical Stimulation of Cardiac Myocytes”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 23(6): 812-821, 1995, Abstract. |
Saksena et al. “Prevention of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation With Chronic Dual-Site Right Atrial Pacing”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 28(3): 687-694, 1996, Abstract. |
Saveliev et al. “Guidebook on Clinical Endoscopy”, Moscow Medicine, p. 21, 35, Extract, 1985. |
Schwartz et al. “Exposure of Frog Hearts to CW or Amplitude-Modified VHF Fields: Selective Efflux of Calcium Ions at 16 Hz”, Bioelectromagnetics, 11(4): 349-358, 1990, Abstract. |
Shumaik et al. “Oleander Poisoning: Treatment With Digoxin-Specific Fab Antibody Fragments”, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 17(7): 732-735, 1988. |
Skale et al. “Inhibition of Premature Ventricular Extrastimuli by Subthreshold Conditioning Stimuli”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 6: 133-140, 1985. Abstract. |
Solomonow et al. “Control of Muscle Contractile Force Through Indirect High-Frequency Stimulation”, American Journal of Physical Medicine, 62(2): 71-82, Apr. 1983. Abstract. |
Stevenson et al. “Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation in Relation to Age of Myocardial Infarction”, The American Journal of Cardiology, 57(6): 387-391, Feb. 15, 1986. Abstract. |
Sweeny et al. “Countershock Strength-Duration Relationship for Myocardial Refractory Period Extension”, Academic Emergency Medicine, 2(1): 57-62, 1995, Abstract. |
Sweeny et al. “Refractory Interval After Transcardiac Shocks During Ventricular Fibrillation”, Circulation, 94(11): 2947-2952, 1996. |
Sweeny et al. “Ventricular Refractory Period Extension Caused by Defibrillation Shocks”, Circulation, 82(3): 965-972, 1990. |
Talit et al. “The Effect of External Cardiac Pacing on Stroke Volume”, Pace, 13(5): 598-602, 1990. Abstract. |
Taniguchi et al. “Inhomogeneity of Cellular Activation Time and Vmax in Normal Myocardial Tissue Under Electrical Field Stimulation”, Am. J. Physiol., 267: H694-H705, 1994, Abstract. |
Thakor et al. “Effect of Varying Pacing Waveform Shapes on Propagation and Hemodynamics in the Rabbit Heart”, The Americal Journal of Cardiology, 79(6A): 36-43, 1997, Abstract. |
Tsong “Electroporation of Cell Membranes”, Biophysical Journal, 60: 297-306, 1991. |
Verrier et al. “Electrophysiologic Basis for T Wave Alternans as An Index of Vulnerability to Ventricular Fibrillation”, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 5(5): 445-461, 1994. Abstract. |
Webster “Design of Cardiac Pacemakers”, IEEE Press, p. xi-xiii, 1995. |
Wessale et al. “Stroke Volume and the Three Phase Cardiac Output Rate Relationship With Ventricular Pacing”, PACE, 13: 673-680, 1990. |
Windle et al. “Subthreshold Conditioning Stimuli Prolong Human Ventricular Refractoriness”, American Journal of Cardiology, 57(6): 381-386, 1986. Abstract. |
Wirtzfeld et al. “Physiological Pacing: Present Status and Future Developments”, Pace, 10(Part I): 41-57, 1987. Abstract. |
Yokoyama “The Phase of Supernormal Excitation in Relation to the Strength of Subthreshold Stimuli”, Japanese Heart Journal, 17(3): 315-325, May 1976. |
Zipes et al. “Cardiac Electrophysiology—From Cell to Bedside”, Saunders Co., 4th Ed., 1990. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Mar. 11, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 06127216.7. |
Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC Dated Oct. 7, 2008 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 06127216.7. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 9, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Feb. 15, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,963. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Apr. 19, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,812. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Mar. 29, 2012 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Notice of Reason for Rejection Dated Jun. 12, 2007 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2000-502823. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection Dated Oct. 3, 2006 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2000-502823. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 29, 2004 From the Israeli Patent Office Re.: Application No. 133902. |
Official Action Dated Mar. 8, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Official Action Dated Dec. 11, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,881. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 15, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 22, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Official Action Dated Feb. 23, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,963. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 26, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,812. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 28, 2010 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/932,963. |
Official Action Dated Aug. 31, 2011 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/736,183. |
Requisition by the Examiner Dated Sep. 5, 2008 From the Canadian Intellectual Property Office Re.: Application No. 2,296,632. |
Requisition by the Examiner Dated Jul. 14, 2004 From the Canadian Intellectual Property Office Re.: Application No. 2,296,632. |
Requisition by the Examiner Dated Nov. 23, 2006 From the Canadian Intellectual Property Office Re.: Application No. 2,296,632. |
Antoni et al. “Polarization Effects of Sinusoidal 50-Cycle Alternating Current on Membrane Potential of Mammalian Cardiac Fibres”, Pfl?gers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 314(4): 274-291, 1970. Abstract. |
Babsky et al. Translation of Physiology of Man, Moscow Medicine, p. 115, 348-351, 376, Extracts. |
Devedeux et al. “Uterine Electromyography: A Critical Review”, American Journal of Obstetric Gynecology, 169: 1636-1653, 1993. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Contril of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. I. Insulin and Glucagon Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Vagus Nerves”, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111(1): 1-7, Jan. 1981. Abstract. |
Holst et al. “Nervous Control of Pancreatic Endocrine Secretion in Pigs. II. The Effect of Pharmacological Blocking Agents on the Response to Vagal Stimulation”, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 111(1): 9-14, Jan. 1981. Abstract. |
Park et al. “Significant Cholinergic Role in Secretin-Stimulated Exocrine Secretion in Isolated Rat Pancreas”, American Journal of Physiology, AJP—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 274(2): G413-G418, Feb. 1998. |
Pokrovsky et al. Physiology of Man, 1: 82-83, 94, 2: 42, 54. |
Saveliev et al. Guidebook on Clinical Endoscopy, p. 21, 35, Extract. |
Shmit et al. Physiology of Man, 1: 78, 1996. |
Shuba et al. Physiology of Vessel Smooth Muscles, p. 11-15, 142, 1988. |
Singh et al. “Effects of Islet Hormones on Nerve-Mediated and Acetylcholine-Evoked Secretory Responses in the Isolated Pancreas of Normal and Diabetic Rats”, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 1(3): 627-634, Mar. 1998. Abstract. |
Van Riper et al. “Electrical Field Stimulation—Mediated Relaxation of A Rabbit Middle Cerebral Artery. Evidence of A Cholinergic Endothelium-Dependent Component”, Circulation Research, 70: 1104-1112, 1992. |
Zhou et al. “Prevention of Action Potentials During Extracellular Electrical Stimulation of Long Duration”, Journal of Cardiovascular & Electrophysiology, 8(7): 779-789, 1997. Abstract. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Dated Jun. 18, 2013 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 04745004.4. |
Official Action Dated Jun. 14, 2013 From the U.S. Appl. No. 10/526,708. |
Official Action dated Jul. 2, 2013 From the U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Notice of Allowance Dated Aug. 1, 2013 From the U.S. Appl. No. 10/599,015. |
Official Action Dated Jul. 2, 2013 From U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Official Action Dated Sep. 12, 2013 From the U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,560. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 14, 2013 From U.S. Appl. No. 11/884,389. |
Official Action Dated Nov. 27, 2013 From U.S. Appl. No. 10/570,576. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070027493 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60488964 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/IL2004/000664 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11336099 | US |