Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.
This disclosure is related to circuits and more particularly to control circuits for high-power applications.
A conventional gate driver integrated circuit is susceptible to error conditions that may damage the gate driver integrated circuit or a high-power drive device coupled to the gate driver integrated circuit. For example, when a short circuit condition exists or an abnormally heavy capacitive load is coupled to the gate driver integrated circuit, a relatively high current flows through the gate driver integrated circuit and may damage the gate driver integrated circuit. Measuring the die temperature of the gate driver integrated circuit using a temperature sensor is slow since heat propagates slowly through a semiconductor die. Although a temperature measurement strategy of the conventional integrated circuit gate driver provides some protection from damage due to short circuits or capacitive loads that are marginally larger than expected, if a sudden, short circuit occurs on the output of the gate driver integrated circuit, temperature sensing is too slow to react and reconfigure the gate driver integrated circuit in a safe state that would reduce the temperature and save the system from damage. Other techniques have substantial second-order effects and may be difficult to implement in a high current environment. For example, current sensing techniques may not be feasible due to difficulties in implementing an adequate current mirror in a high current environment. Accordingly, improved techniques for protecting a gate driver system from damage are desired.
In at least one embodiment, a method for protecting a system including a driver integrated circuit includes receiving a driver input signal. The method includes driving an output signal externally to the driver integrated circuit. The output signal is driven based on the driver input signal and an indication of a delay between receipt of an edge of the driver input signal and arrival of a corresponding edge of the output signal at an output node coupled to a terminal of the driver integrated circuit.
In at least one embodiment, an integrated circuit for controlling a high-power drive device includes a driver circuit configured to drive an output signal to a terminal of the integrated circuit. The output signal is driven based on a driver input signal and an error signal. The integrated circuit includes a logic circuit configured to generate the error signal based on an indication of a delay between receipt of an edge of the driver input signal and arrival of a corresponding edge of the output signal at an output node coupled to the terminal.
The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features, and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings.
The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
A gate driver integrated circuit with short circuit protection has improved tolerance to a short or relatively heavy capacitive load on an output terminal as compared to a conventional integrated circuit gate driver that implements short circuit protection using only a temperature measurement technique. Conventional integrated circuit gate drivers using temperature measurement techniques would fail under similar conditions and lead to catastrophic failure of the conventional integrated circuit gate driver in a target application. Referring to
In at least one embodiment, gate driver integrated circuit 100 is included in an exemplary motor control application and is included in a system having an isolation barrier and an isolation communications channel for safely communicating control signals from another integrated circuit. Differential pair of terminals RXP and RXN receive an input signal from the isolation communications channel and receiver path 102 and demodulator 104 recover input signal DATA from the received signal. In at least one embodiment, gate driver integrated circuit 100 is coupled to a high-power drive device of a three-phase inverter used to deliver three-phase power to a motor. Exemplary high-power drive devices include power metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), Gallium-Nitride (GaN) MOSFETs, Silicon-Carbide power MOSFETs, or other suitable devices able to deliver high currents over short periods of time.
Referring to
If the time difference between an edge of input signal DATA and a corresponding output edge exceeds the predetermined threshold value, then a logic circuit that implements a digital state machine configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in a safer state of operation (i.e., a state that is safer than a normal state of operation, e.g., configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 to strongly pull down the external node or weakly pull down the external node according to whether gate driver integrated circuit 100 is pulling up or pulling down in a normal state of operation). After gate driver integrated circuit 100 is configured in the safer state of operation, the logic circuit periodically attempts to return gate driver integrated circuit 100 to the normal state of operation. If the delay of gate driver integrated circuit 100 is within a target range, then gate driver integrated circuit 100 continues or resumes normal operation. If gate driver integrated circuit 100 continues to have relatively large delays, then the logic circuit maintains gate driver integrated circuit 100 in a safer state of operation and periodically attempts to resume normal operation.
In at least one embodiment of gate driver integrated circuit 100, rather than, or in addition to, comparing the delay to a threshold level for each signal transition, gate driver integrated circuit 100 estimates a long-term average of transition delays. If the estimate of the long-term average of transition delays exceeds a predetermined long-term average delay threshold, then the logic circuit causes gate driver integrated circuit 100 to enter a safer state, like the strategy discussed above. Accordingly, gate driver integrated circuit 100 can detect a short circuit condition and cause gate driver integrated circuit 100 to enter a safer state relatively quickly even in an environment where input signal DATA has many transitions.
Referring to
In at least one embodiment, desaturation logic 124 logically combines digital signal RISE_RDY and digital signal FALL_RDY, with input signal DATA (or a signal corresponding to the logic value of input signal DATA) to generate logic signal OUT_RISING and logic signal OUT_FALLING, respectively. Logic signal OUT_RISING and logic signal OUT_FALLING are indicative of whether a corresponding rising edge or falling edge of input signal DATA is delayed at the output. Desaturation logic 124 generates signal INC, which is a digital signal that is active when a corresponding rising edge or falling edge of input signal DATA is delayed at the output, and is inactive otherwise. In at least one embodiment, desaturation logic 124 includes a counter that increments in response to signal INC being active and stores a corresponding count in register 308 synchronously to an edge of a clock control signal (e.g., a 32 MHz clock signal).
In at least one embodiment of desaturation logic 124, comparator 310 determines whether the count exceeds predetermined threshold count DESAT_THRESH and generates one or more error signal based thereon. In at least one embodiment, the error signal(s) indicate whether a delay that exceeds the threshold occurs in response to a rising edge of input signal DATA or a falling edge of input signal DATA. For example, if a delay that exceeds the threshold occurs in response to a rising edge, then desaturation logic 124 pulses error signal DESAT_P and if the delay that exceeds the threshold occurs in response to a falling edge, then desaturation logic 124 pulses error signal DESAT_N.
Input signal DATA rises from logic ‘0’ in interval A to logic ‘1’ in interval B while DRIVER OUT remains at logic ‘0.’ In interval B, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are unequal, signal OUT_RISING is active and desaturation logic 124 increments the count (e.g., INC is active) to cause DESAT_CNT to increase linearly. In interval C, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are equal, signal OUT_RISING is inactive, and register 308 is reset to clear DESAT_CNT. In interval D, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are unequal, signal OUT_FALLING is active and desaturation logic 124 increments the count (e.g., INC is active) to cause DESAT_CNT to increase linearly. In interval E, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are equal, signal OUT_FALLING is inactive, and register 308 is reset to clear DESAT_CNT.
Input signal DATA rises from logic ‘0’ in interval E to logic ‘1’ in interval F while DRIVER OUT remains at logic ‘0.’ In interval F, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are unequal, signal OUT_RISING is active and desaturation logic 124 increments the count (e.g., INC is active) to cause DESAT_CNT to increase linearly. In interval F, in response to DESAT_CNT crossing threshold value DESAT_THRESH, desaturation pulses error signal DESAT_P.
In at least one embodiment, control and protection logic 106 includes desaturation logic 124 that estimates a long-term average of transition delays over a predetermined interval. Referring to
Desaturation logic 124 logically combines digital signal RISE_RDY and digital signal FALL_RDY, with input signal DATA (or a signal corresponding to the logic value of input signal DATA) to generate logic signal OUT_RISING and logic signal OUT_FALLING, respectively. Logic signal OUT_RISING and logic signal OUT_FALLING indicate whether a corresponding rising edge or falling edge of input signal DATA is delayed at the output (e.g., logic level corresponding to digital signal OUT_DP and the logic level corresponding to input signal DATA are unequal). Desaturation logic 124 uses logic signal OUT_RISING and logic signal OUT_FALLING to generate control signal INC, which is active when the logic value of the input signal DATA is not equal to a logic value corresponding to the output signal (e.g., a logic value corresponding to digital signal OUT_DP or a logic value corresponding to digital signal OUT_DN) and is inactive otherwise. Desaturation logic 124 includes register 308 (e.g., a five-bit register) that updates a stored counter value in response to increment count signal INC_CNT synchronously to a clock control signal (e.g., a 32 MHz clock signal). The counter output signal DESAT_CNT is fed back to summing circuit 304. Summing circuit 304 subtracts a DC offset (e.g., generated by summing circuit 304 combining a 2 MHz period waveform and a 500 kHz period waveform or a 4 MHz and period waveform and 500 kHz period waveform) from a current value of counter output signal DESAT_CNT and increments that difference as needed before updating register 308. Thus, desaturation logic 124 increments the count at a first predetermined rate and decrements the count at a second predetermined rate, effectively subtracting a fraction of a least-significant bit of the counter every clock period (e.g., for an effective 2.5 counts per 1 μs when summing circuit 304 combines the 2 MHz period waveform with the 500 kHz period waveform or for an effective 4.5 counts per 1 μs when summing circuit 304 combines the 4 MHz period waveform with the 500 kHz period waveform). In at least one embodiment, the first predetermined rate is greater than the second predetermined rate. Other embodiments of desaturation logic 124 use different digital circuit implementations to generate counter output signal DESAT_CNT or implementations of other computations that estimate the long-term average of the delay.
Input signal DATA rises from logic ‘0’ in interval A to logic ‘1’ in interval B while DRIVER OUT remains at logic ‘0.’ In interval B, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are unequal, signal OUT_RISING is active and desaturation logic 124 increments the count (e.g., INC is active) by a first predetermined offset value to cause DESAT_CNT to increase linearly at a first rate. In interval C, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are equal, signal OUT_RISING is inactive, and desaturation logic 124 decrements the count (e.g., INC is inactive) by a second predetermined offset value to cause DESAT_CNT to decrease linearly at a second rate that is slower than the first rate. Input signal DATA falls from logic ‘1’ in interval C to logic ‘0’ in interval D while DRIVER OUT remains at logic ‘1.’ In interval D, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are unequal, signal OUT_FALLING is active and desaturation logic 124 increments the count (e.g., INC is active) by the first predetermined offset value to cause DESAT_CNT to increase linearly at the first rate. In interval E, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are equal, signal OUT_FALLING is inactive, and desaturation logic 124 decrements the count (e.g., INC is inactive) by the second predetermined offset value to cause DESAT_CNT to decrease linearly at the second rate.
Input signal DATA rises from logic ‘0’ in interval E to logic ‘1’ in interval F while DRIVER OUT remains at logic ‘0.’ In interval F, input signal DATA and signal DRIVER_OUT are unequal, signal OUT_RISING is active and desaturation logic 124 increments the count (e.g., INC is active) by the first predetermined offset value to cause DESAT_CNT to increase linearly. In interval F, in response to DESAT_CNT exceeds threshold value THRESH, and desaturation logic 124 causes the signal DESAT_OUT to reset register 308 and pulses error signal DESAT_P.
Referring to
In an exemplary embodiment of gate driver integrated circuit 100, protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 to operate in normal state 502 in the absence of an error condition. Protection logic 126 determines whether an error has occurred by monitoring error signal DESAT_P and error signal DESAT_N, discussed above. If no error has occurred, then protection logic 126 and gate driver integrated circuit 100 continue operation in normal state 502. If error signal DESAT_N is active (e.g., DESAT_N=‘1’), indicating that the output has been transitioning low for an interval longer than a predetermined interval (e.g., greater than 8% of the time over an interval of 10 μs or for an interval greater than or equal to 1 μs), then protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in DESAT_N state 510. If error signal DESAT_P is active (e.g., DESAT_P=‘1’), indicating that the output has been transitioning high for an interval longer than a predetermined interval (e.g., greater than 8% of the time over an interval of 10 μs or for an interval greater than or equal to 1 μs), then protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in DESAT_P state 504.
In DESAT_P state 504, gate driver integrated circuit 100 starts a timer and strongly drives the output low (e.g., having a strength that is equal to or greater than the strength used when driving the output low in normal state 502). Upon the expiration of a predetermined interval (e.g., 1 ms) while in DESAT_P state 504, if error signal DESAT_N is active, then protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in DESAT_N state 510. Upon the expiration of the predetermined interval while in DESAT_P state 504, protection logic 126 returns to normal state 502. In DESAT_N state 510, gate driver integrated circuit 100 starts the timer and weakly drives the output low (e.g., having a strength that is less than the strength used to drive the output low during normal state 502). In at least one embodiment, when weakly driving the output low, the current output of gate driver integrated circuit 100 is low enough that gate driver integrated circuit 100 can survive in this condition for a long time (e.g., the product lifetime). For example, gate driver integrated circuit 100 drives only a few milli-Amps of current into the output in a worst-case thermal environment. In response to expiration of a predetermined interval (e.g., 1 ms), protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 to return to normal state 502.
In at least one embodiment, in addition to monitoring a delay between the input signal DATA and an output signal, if gate driver integrated circuit 100 has a die temperature that exceeds a threshold, then protection logic 126 transitions to a strong pull-down configuration to prevent an external device from being damaged. In at least one embodiment, if gate driver integrated circuit 100 has a die temperature that exceeds a threshold for an extended period of time or exceeds the threshold in combination with an excessive delay, then protection logic 126 transitions to a weak pull-down configuration since the strong pulldown state has not eliminated an overtemperature condition.
In at least one embodiment of protection logic 126, in addition to error signals DESAT_N and DESAT_P, protection logic 126 also receives an indication of a sensed die temperature or other sensed information and detects errors based on the sensed die temperature or other sensed information. For example, temperature sensor 122 provides a sensed temperature to protection circuit 126, which generates error signal OVERTEMP based on a comparison of the sensed temperature to a threshold temperature. Error signal OVERTEMP is set (e.g., OVERTEMP=‘1’) in response to the sensed temperature exceeding the threshold temperature. Referring to
In normal state 502, if error signal OVERTEMP is active, then protection circuit 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in TOVER_LOW state 508. In DESAT_P state 504, if error signal OVERTEMP is active, then protection circuit 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in TOVER_TS state 512. In DESAT_N state 510, if error signal OVERTEMP is active, then protection circuit 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in TOVER_TS state 512.
In TOVER_LOW state 508, protection circuit 126 enables a timer and strongly drives the output low (e.g., having a strength that is equal to or greater than the strength used when driving the output low in normal state 502). Then, if error signal DESAT_N is active, then protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in DESAT_N state 510. If error signal DESAT_N is inactive and error signal OVERTEMP is inactive, then protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in DESAT_PRST state 506. Protection logic 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in TOVER_TS state 512 in response to the expiration of a predetermined interval (e.g., 1 ms) while in TOVER_LOW state 508.
In TOVER_TS state 512, protection circuit 126 resets the timer and weakly drives the output low (e.g., having a strength that is less than the strength used when driving the output low in normal state 502). Then, protection circuit 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 to operate in state DESAT_N 510 in response to error signal OVERTEMP being reset. In DESAT_PRST state 506, protection circuit 126 resets the timer and then protection circuit 126 configures gate driver integrated circuit 100 in DESAT_P state 504. The safer states and conditions for transitioning between states described with reference to
Thus, techniques for providing short circuit protection in a system including a gate driver integrated circuit are disclosed. The description of the invention set forth herein is illustrative and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims. For example, while the invention has been described in an embodiment in which gate driver integrated circuit 100 is coupled to an IGBT high-power drive device, one of skill in the art will appreciate that the teachings herein can be utilized with other device types. In addition, while the invention has been described in embodiments in which gate driver integrated circuit 100 is used in a motor application, one of skill in the art will appreciate that the teachings herein can be utilized in other applications. Variations and modifications of the embodiments disclosed herein, may be made based on the description set forth herein, without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6097582 | John et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6271709 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6473280 | Buxton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6545513 | Tsuchida et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6717785 | Fukuda et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6967519 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7180337 | Feldtkeller | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7948277 | Nakatake et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7978453 | Sharaa | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8213192 | Konecny et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8237376 | Franco | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8350601 | Nagata et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8362800 | Or-Bach et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8405373 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8723590 | Curbelo et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8985850 | Godbole et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9054621 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9166499 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184743 | Shimizu | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9294019 | Liu et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9374028 | Nondahl et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9425786 | Zoels et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9455566 | Hiyama | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9467138 | Osanai | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9490738 | Nondahl et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9608623 | Kandah et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9698654 | Santos et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9793890 | Kirchner et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9979292 | Zhang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9998110 | Zojer | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10038434 | Volke et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10211824 | Tsurumaru | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10461730 | Mariconti et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10469057 | Frank et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10469075 | Horváth | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10514016 | Nodake | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10587262 | Morini et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10587268 | Li et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608625 | Bernacchia et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10680601 | Kempitiya | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10715132 | Takayama | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10742108 | Tomisawa et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763848 | Takano et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10778195 | Gokan | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10784857 | Li et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10790818 | Frank | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10819212 | Nagano et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10917083 | Masuhara et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11057029 | Westwick et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11641197 | Onódy et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
20020109417 | Torrisi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040136135 | Takahashi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040251951 | Beck | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20080106319 | Bayerer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080315925 | Alfano et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021294 | Morishita et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100148830 | Nilson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110050198 | Dong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110157919 | Yedevelly et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157941 | Yedevelly et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120013370 | Mori et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120161841 | Dong et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194218 | Or-Bach et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218669 | Ioannidis et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130088894 | Pal et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130242438 | Fukuta et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140077782 | Cortigiani et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150015309 | Werber | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150070078 | Jeong et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085403 | Santos et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160087560 | Miller | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160218046 | Or-Bach et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160359480 | Kim | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180026629 | Ptacek | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180115310 | Horiguci et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180351546 | Horiguchi et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190229640 | Aichriedler et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190372567 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20210305927 | Kirby et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20220352884 | Onódy et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
109687693 | Apr 2019 | CN |
2020-057903 | Apr 2020 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Agilent Technologies, “20 Amp Gate Drive Optocoupler with Integrated (VCE) Desaturation Detection and Fault Status Feed-back,” HCPL-316J, Mar. 1, 2005, 33 pages. |
Allan, R., “SiC and GaN vs. IGBTs: The Imminent Tug of War for Supremacy,” Power Electronics, downloaded from powerelectronics.com, Feb. 24, 2020, 2 pages. |
Analog Devices, Inc., “Isolated Half-Bridge Driver with Integrated High-Side Supply,” ADuM5230, 2008-2013, 16 pages. |
Analog Devices, Inc., “Isolated Half-Bridge Gate Driver with Integrated Isolated High-Side Supply,” ADuM6132, 2008-2012, 16 pages. |
Avago Technologies, “Desaturation Fault Detection Optocoupler Gate Drive Products with Feature: ACPL-333J, ACPL-332J, ACPL-331J, and HCPL-316J,” Application Note 5324, Jan. 9, 2012, 7 pages. |
Avago Technologies, “Dual-Output Gate Drive Optocoupler Interface with Integrated (VCE) Desat Detection, FAULT and UVLO Status Feedback,” ACPL-339J, Jan. 31, 2013, 23 pages. |
Avago Technologies, “Active Miller Clamp Products with Feature: ACPL-331J, ACPL-332J,” Application Note 5314, Jul. 21, 2010, 6 pages. |
Broadcom, “Data Sheet ACPL-352J 5.0 Amp Output Current IGBt and SiC/GaNMOSFET Gate Drive Optocoupler with Integrated Overcurrent Sensing, FAULT, GAIT, and UVLO Status Feedback,” May 15, 2020, 29 pages. |
Infineon, “EiceDRIVER™ External Booster for Driver IC,” Application Note, AN2013-10, Revision 1.6, Aug. 5, 2014, 17 pages. |
Infineon, “EiceDRIVER™ High Voltage Gate Driver IC with Reinforced Isolation,” Final Datasheet, Revision 2.1, Oct. 22, 2018, pp. 1-33. |
Obara, H., et al., “Active Gate Contole in Half-Bridge Inverters Using Programmable Gate Driver ICs to Improve Both Surge Voltage and Converter Efficiency,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 54, No. 5, Oct. 2018, pp. 4603-4611. |
Schindler, A., et al., “10ns Variable Current Gate Driver with Control Loop for Optimized Gate Current Timing and Level Control for In-Transition Slope Shaping,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Mar. 26-30, 2017, 6 pages. |
Silicon Labs, “AN1009: Driving MOSFET and IGBT Switches Using the Si828x,” downloaded from silabs.com on Feb. 21, 2020, 22 pages. |
Silicon Labs, “Si8285/86 Data Sheet,” downloaded from silabs.com on Feb. 21, 2020, 33 pages. |
Texas Instruments, “Fully-Differential Isolation Amplifier,” AMC1200 AMC1200B, Apr. 2011—Revised Aug. 2012, 24 pages. |
Texas Instruments, “Precision Lowest-Cost Isoltaion Amplifier,” ISO124, Sep. 1997—Revised Sep. 2005, 17 pages. |
Texas Instruments, “TI Designs, IGBT Gate Driver Reference Design for Parallel IGBts with Short-Circuit Protection and External BJT Buffer,” tiDUC70A, Dec. 2016—Revised Jan. 2017, 33 pages. |
Texas Instruments, “Understanding the Short Circuit Protection for Silicon Carbide MOSFETs,” TI TechNotes, Jan. 2018—Revised Mar. 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Vacca, G., “Benefits and Advantages of Silicon Carbide Power Devices Over Their Silicon Counterparts,” Semiconductor Today, Compounds & Advanced Silicon, vol. 12, Issue 3, Apr./May 2017, 4 pages. |
Zhao, S., et al., “Adaptive Multi-Level Active Gate Drivers for SiC Power Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 35, No. 2, Feb. 2020, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230308090 A1 | Sep 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17242909 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 18126923 | US |