This invention relates to gate suspension systems and components, such as gate rollers, and related methods.
Cantilever gates have been a staple in the fence industry for many years. These gates are especially useful in situations where other solutions to support the gate (such as ground rollers, ground track, or overhead track) as it traverses the opening are not practical or desirable. Such situations can occur due to uneven terrain, overhead clearance requirements, or the potential for ice or snow interfering with ground supported configurations.
Such gates are used in a wide variety of applications, including (by way of example) gated communities, commercial, industrial, and other security-type installations. One common cantilever gate design incorporates four or more rollers within which the upper and lower horizontal frame members of the gate are positioned within channels formed in the rollers. Although the predominant configuration of the gates in these applications has been chain link attached to a frame made from round tubular members, such gates have more recently begun to be made from square or rectangular tubular members, at least in part to meet a growing demand for gates having a more ornamental style.
Typically, the rollers for these gates (which facilitate the gates' movement between open and closed positions) have been fashioned with channels in the rollers that are shaped to correspond to the shape of the gate frame member on which the gate is intended to be used. This allows the roller to be seated securely and not become dislodged from its intended movement track. Thus, for the conventional round tubing frame covered with chain link, the channel track. Thus, for the conventional round tubing frame covered with chain link, the channel roughly approximates a half-circle. For other shapes of gate frame members (such as those with square or rectangular cross-sectional shapes), the roller channel typically is formed with a corresponding square/rectangular shape.
Gate frame members with non-round cross-sections typically have a flat/horizontal load-bearing surface, and perpendicular (generally vertical) sidewalls. This design functions and currently is the standard practice in the industry, but it has some shortcomings. Among other things, as any of these gates (whether they have round or non-round frames) travels there is a tendency for the gate to drift side-to-side, laterally to the gate's intended travel path. Weather conditions (such as a cross-wind) can exacerbate that lateral movement. Any such lateral movement can result in undesired frictional rubbing between the confronting vertical sidewalls of the roller and the gate frame. The more extreme the wind, the more friction can occur. Besides generating excessive wear and damaging the paint or other finishes on those rubbing surfaces, that undesirable friction can increase the energy required to move the gate along the track, adding to the power requirements for the installation and causing correspondingly excessive loads on the motor that moves the gate. In certain installations and conditions, the undesired rubbing can even generate irritating or even potentially harmful noise.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with references to the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner, simply because it is being utilized in conjunction with a detailed description of certain embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, various embodiments of the invention (whether or not specifically described herein) may include novel features, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or which is essential to practicing the invention herein described.
Although the examples of the many various methods of the invention are described herein with steps occurring in a certain order, the specific order of the steps, or any continuation or interruption between steps, is not necessarily intended to be required for any given method of practicing the invention.
As illustrated in the drawings, the invention preferably substantially reduces or even eliminates contact between the confronting sidewalls of the roller channel and the gate frame. Among other benefits, this substantially reduces the friction and corresponding wear on those surfaces, as well as the noise that can be generated by that rubbing. It also can reduce the energy and maintenance requirements for automated gate systems in which the invention is used, and can reduce the related maintenance requirements for the gate itself.
The channel of the invention preferably has tapered sides 16 and 18 (rather than substantially vertical sides as shown in the prior art of
In
The materials and dimensions for manufacturing and practicing the invention can be selected from a wide variety, depending on a number of factors (such as economics, environment in which the gate will be deployed, size of the gate, etc.). Persons of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the specific configurations and assemblies in which the invention is provided can likewise be any of a broad range.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/058348 | 10/1/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/049840 | 4/4/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
321708 | Gardner | Jul 1885 | A |
771766 | Burkholder | Oct 1904 | A |
3033285 | Banner | May 1962 | A |
3045538 | Kotte | Jul 1962 | A |
3446410 | Brose | May 1969 | A |
3473266 | Miller | Oct 1969 | A |
3524607 | Falk | Aug 1970 | A |
3725606 | Thompson | Apr 1973 | A |
3886685 | Riphagen | Jun 1975 | A |
3907234 | Sato | Sep 1975 | A |
3925933 | Reuter | Dec 1975 | A |
4225097 | Ohtomo | Sep 1980 | A |
4898567 | Tatara | Feb 1990 | A |
5022185 | Oatman | Jun 1991 | A |
5528862 | Streeter | Jun 1996 | A |
6176493 | Whipps | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253492 | Finke | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6446394 | Finke | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6516566 | Finke | Feb 2003 | B2 |
7228659 | Romero | Jun 2007 | B2 |
8393114 | Haab | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9003713 | Dries | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9316261 | Dellupi | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20050101424 | Van Der Sluis | May 2005 | A1 |
20050221938 | Yoshida | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20110166003 | Brice | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120021859 | Faes | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130303316 | Sano | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20160319917 | Van Der Meer | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180023664 | Bransma | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180314302 | Gopalan | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190003555 | Ishiguro | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0134824 | Mar 1985 | EP |
0497137 | Aug 1992 | EP |
2513688 | Apr 1983 | FR |
625761 | Jul 1949 | GB |
WO2009121468 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Idler pulley for slag conveyor; derwent No. 2008-G08345, inventor Jiang, priority data date-2007CN-20018374, Jan. 31, 2007, publication date Jan. 2, 2008 (attached: 1 page of figure, 1 page of title with abstract=2 pages total). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140223827 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61541392 | Sep 2011 | US |