The invention relates to a gate valve having a body comprising a first part, a second part, and inlet- and outlet parts, wherein said first and second parts defining a cavity in said body in fluid connection with respective openings in the inlet- and outlet parts, and where a wedge is movable in said body, into the cavity for forming a barrier between the inlet- and outlet parts, thereby preventing fluid flow through the body, and out of said cavity for allowing said fluid flow.
A gate valve of the above mentioned type is known from e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 2,934,313 and PCT/NO02/00117 (WO 02/077504 A1), the latter filed by the applicant. In the known gate valves, the wedge is typically guided by an insert disposed in the valve body. Use of guiding paths in a gate valve is a common technical solution in metal seated gate valves as well as in resilient seated gate valves. Use of guiding paths in combination with low friction guiding areas on the wedge is well known, e.g. in European patent application EP 0 926 410 A2.
In the known gate valves, the valve housing is either cast in one piece with continuous guide paths, or the valve housing is two-part design, and the guide paths extend down to this separation or are totally absent. Such absence of guide paths or discontinuity of guide paths will affect the guidance of the wedge and/or increase the wear on the corresponding areas on the wedge.
There is also a risk of misalignment during assembly of valve's upper part and bottom parts, with a potential reduced quality and performance of the guiding paths during operation. These adverse factors contribute to reducing the useful life time for such gate valve.
It is therefore a need for a gate valve having reliable guide paths, thus easing assembly and improving operation of the gate valve.
A gate valve sealing insert needs to have a certain strength and rigidity in order to fulfil its intended purpose. Regulations stipulate that potable water should only be exposed to certain materials, which are selected focusing on health issues and not on material properties like strength and rigidity. Thus achieving the necessary strength and rigidity in the sealing insert, while at the same time complying with the relevant health regulations, is a problem.
The present invention solves that need, in that it provides a gate valve having a body comprising a first part, a second part, and inlet- and outlet parts, said first and second parts defining a cavity in said body in fluid connection with respective openings in the inlet- and outlet parts, and a wedge movable in said body, into said cavity for forming a barrier between the inlet- and outlet parts, thereby preventing fluid flow through the body, and out of said cavity for allowing said fluid flow. The inventive gate valve is characterized by guiding objects on generally opposite sides of the wedge for guiding said wedge movement, a major part of each guiding object being accommodated in the first part and a portion of each guiding object extending into a region of said cavity defined by the second part, thus bridging a respective gap between the first and second parts and essentially overlapping respective areas of said second part, thereby ensuring continuous guiding paths for the wedge.
The invention also provides a sealing insert for a gate valve comprising a first part, a second part, and inlet- and outlet parts, the sealing insert being adapted for assembly into a cavity formed by the first part and the second part and further comprising a region which under normal conditions is exposed to the water flowing through the valve. The sealing insert is characterized by a rigid skeleton element covered by a resilient material to such an extent that said region of the sealing insert which under normal conditions is exposed to the water flowing through the valve, is substantially covered by said resilient material.
Hence, the insert can in effect be divided into two general regions; one to which the water flowing through the valve is exposed, and one which is not intended for coming into contact with water. In the latter, there are generally few health concerns and the material restrictions are thus less rigid. For the region of the insert which is designed to be wet when the valve is in use, stricter (health-related) regulations apply. The invented insert provides an improved skeleton compared with the prior art, while complying with the applicable regulations.
An innovative feature is thus the use of guiding paths in a resilient seated gate valve where the valve body is divided in an upper part, a bottom part, an inlet part, and an outlet part, and that the guiding paths have been extended from the upper part down into the bottom part below the centreline of the valve. This will ensure a better performance of the guiding of the wedge in closed position, and also prevent a split in the guiding path that will increase the wear on the corresponding areas on the wedge. It also prevents a possible mismatch and a reduction of quality of the guiding paths during assembly of upper part and bottom part. In total, this will ensure an optimum quality of the guiding paths, less wear, and a longer lifetime for the valve. In one embodiment, the guide path area in the upper part is extended as two teeth or as a profile, and a corresponding pocket or groove is cast in the bottom part.
An alternative solution is to cast a separate guiding area in the upper part and the bottom part, and connect these two areas by insertion of a continuous guiding path in a low friction material during assembly. The benefit would be a more simplified casting geometry and a possibility of replacing the guiding paths, and the use of different material in the guiding paths for different applications.
As an alternative to using an insert, the valve could be made with the sealing integrated in a rubber coated bottom part, i.e. the bottom part and the sealing insert are essentially combined into one unit. The rubber coated bottom part could then fully replace the need of an insert.
Such bottom cover could for example be made in a cast iron grade and fully rubber coated. The rubber coating would be able to calibrate the grooves for the coupling area as well as an epoxy protection film for the inlet part and the outlet part as well as a total corrosion protection for the bottom cover. This design would be a great benefit since it would save an epoxy coating process of the bottom cover, and tooling for an insert item. The assembly process would also be easier with lower number of parts.
It would be a great benefit if the bottom cover with the sealing integrated, could be made in a corrosion free material, e.g. stainless steel, and the rubber coating could be limited to the area of wedge sealing, coupling sealing and gasket. By using a high quality casting process, the coupling area could be made with an optimum accuracy without machining.
It would be of a great benefit if both the upper part and the bottom part could be made in a corrosion free material, such as stainless steel, e.g. in an investment casting process. This would enhance the quality and accuracy of the grooves in the coupling area. It would also be a benefit to the environment to avoid the epoxy coating process. To avoid galvanic corrosion problems to the pipeline systems due to a to noble gate valve, the inlet part and the outlet part could still be made in an epoxy coated cast iron grade. The total accuracy in the coupling area would be increased, and the epoxy coating would act as an insulator toward the rest of the pipeline system.
The inlet part and the outlet part could be insulated from metallic contact with the upper part and the bottom part also by other surface treatment, such as a plastic material.
In the gate valve, the coupling area shall connect the upper part, the bottom part, the inlet part, and the outlet part, and secure the necessary strength and tightness to the total valve.
To take care of the casting tolerances and the surface treatment tolerances (normally epoxy coating), and to protect the surface treatment, an insert could be included into the connection area. Such insert could be initially over-sized to adapt the valve body parts and create a rigid coupling. The groove in the upper part and the bottom part could have a larger angle on the outer side to create an axial movement for the inlet part and the outlet part against the insert during assembly. Any deformations during the assembly process would then take place at the insert and not to the surface treatment of the valve body.
There is an important benefit of having a certain deformation of the insert skeleton ring due to the friction against the inlet part and outlet part after assembly. The deformation and friction created will ensure the inlet part and outlet part to become a rigid part of the total valve, and prevent rotational movement of the inlet part and outlet part.
11 To create a more controlled deformation of the insert skeleton ring, it would be preferable to make some deformation zones in the surface of the insert skeleton ring. This could be made by adding some grooves to the surface.
To ensure an easy assembly process of upper part, bottom part, inlet part and outlet part, and to ensure that inlet part and outlet part gets the optimum axial movement against the insert skeleton ring, the groove in upper part and bottom part could be equipped with a low friction ring. This low friction ring will then protect the surface coating of the valve body parts. This low friction ring could also be placed on the corresponding flange of the inlet part and outlet part.
The low friction ring could be replaced with use of a special lubrication in the connection area to achieve the same functionality.
A benefit of placing the low friction ring in the groove of the upper part and the bottom part, would be the possibility of calibrating these grooves before the assembly process. The casting tolerances in the grooves in the upper part and the bottom part would then be better controlled by this calibration process. The calibration process could be done by a melting process using a fixed tool.
The insert skeleton ring in the coupling area could be made of a polymer material with glass fibre reinforcement. The polymer-material could be a Polyamide material or a Polyester based material.
The insert geometry could be made such that the sealing surfaces against the upper part and the bottom part is made as a static sealing formed during the assembly process. The sealing against the inlet part and the outlet part could be made as a combined sealing with a vacuum proof sealing, and a hydraulic sealing to ensure an optimum sealing during a bending situation in the pipeline.
The insert geometry could be made such that any contact between the drinking water in the valve and the insert skeleton ring, not protected by any rubber coating, is avoided. The insert skeleton could then be made in a lot of different materials without requested drinking water approvals. Also lubrication in the coupling area, or use of a low friction ring could be chosen without need of drinking water approvals.
It is a great benefit that the insert can be made without a total rubber coating, like in the area of the insert skeleton ring used in the coupling area of the valve. The insert skeleton ring could then be used as an important positioning surface of the insert skeleton during the rubber coating process to achieve an optimum result of the final insert.
The insert skeleton ring could be made with some pocket areas to fit some corresponding safety knobs in the upper part and the bottom part, see
In a different design, the coupling area could be designed with a groove in the inlet part and the outlet part, and a corresponding geometry in the upper part and the lower part. This design separates the mechanical coupling area from the coupling sealing area. By using a Victaulic type coupling design, almost like in EP 0291331, it is possible to achieve a high mechanical strength and a rigid design, using a simple geometry.
It is a great benefit using a simple Victaulic type coupling design, since the upper part and lower part can easily be machined in this area, together with inlet part, and outlet part, to achieve a high accuracy.
It is a great benefit to avoid machining of the Victaulic type coupling design area of the lower part, and use lower part as a clamping part to achieve a rigid design.
To compensate for casting tolerances of lower part, and thickness tolerances of corrosion protection coating (i.e. epoxy), the insert could have a thin rubber film to be placed in the Victaulic type coupling area. This rubber film will ensure a high friction to the inlet part and the outlet part against the upper part and the lower part, and avoid possible rotation of inlet part and outlet part. By separating the mechanical coupling area, and the coupling sealing area, the thin rubber film may be squeezed, and ruptured, without creating any leakage.
By performing a machining process to the upper part, inlet part and outlet part, and add a thin rubber film into the groove of the Victaulic type coupling area, the tolerances due to casting and surface coating can be controlled. This is important to achieve a rigid coupling, and to control the compression to the gasket between upper part and lower part.
The description refers to a resilient gate valve with an upper part, a bottom part, an inlet part, and an outlet part, like described in WO 02/077504 A1. When using an insert to connect inlet part and outlet part during assembly, or by using a rubber coated bottom part, the wedge can be made in an epoxy coated cast iron grade, or in a corrosion free material, such as stainless steel. Since the wedge is no longer rubber coated, the sealing functionality in fully open position when repacking the valve under pressure is no longer preset. This could be made possible, by extending the wedge nut above the wedge, and add a wedge nut sealing ring.
The valve top represents a total new high quality design, including high strength, low friction and high corrosion resistant. The valve top design includes a lot of features to reduce the number of parts and give an optimised assembly process.
To ensure a high strength, the core part of the valve top is made in stainless steel. To reduce the number of parts, the stainless steel core could have a polymer coating (i.e. POM) to include a dust seal on the top, a bearing surface for the stem, and a polymer protection film below the bolts to avoid metallic contact with the stainless steel core. This polymer protection film creates a larger flexibility in bolt material selection without creating any galvanic corrosion problems.
By using a polymer protection film, the stainless steel core could be made as a raw casting part at a low price, and still the final design would obtain a nice finish.
It is a great benefit if the polymer material coating has a total adhesion to the stainless steel core.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described in more detail, with reference to accompanying drawings, where like parts have been given like reference numbers.
The valve comprises four basic parts: the inlet and outlet parts 14, an upper part (or first part) 10 and a lower or bottom part (second part) 12. These parts are shown in an exploded view in
Returning now to
Turning now to
In an assembled state, the first 10 and second 12 parts define a cavity in the valve body which is in fluid communication with respective openings in the inlet and outlet parts 14. The wedge will be able to move in the valve body, into this cavity for forming a barrier between the inlet and outlet parts thereby preventing fluid flow through the body, and the wedge will also be movable out of said cavity for allowing fluid flow through the body. One inventive feature of the valve is that the at least one guiding object 22; 22′ generally accommodated in the first part of the valve, a portion of which 23; 23′ extending into a region of the cavity defined by a second part, thus essentially overlapping an area in the second part. The guiding objects 22; 22′ will in a preferred embodiment comprise a recess 24; 24′ adapted for guidance of said wedge 18. As shown in
In order to connect the first part 10, second part 12 and the inlet/outlet parts 14, and to take care of any inaccuracies in the casting tolerances and the surface treatment tolerances, and to protect the surface treatment, an insert skeleton ring 30 may be included into the coupling area, as indicated in
As shown in
Instead of using a design as explained above (i.e. with an insert skeleton ring) the coupling area could be designed with a groove in the inlet/outlet parts 14 and a corresponding geometry in the upper part and the lower part, as indicated by the cross sectional drawing in
A feature with this design is that the mechanical coupling area 50 is separated from the coupling sealing area 52. By using such a design, it is possible to achieve a high mechanical strength and a rigid design by using a simple geometry.
As mentioned in the introduction above, it is beneficial to use a simple Victaulic type coupling design, as the first and second parts easily may be machined in this area, together with the outlet/inlet parts in order to achieve a high degree of accuracy. It is a great benefit to avoid machining of the Victaulic type coupling design area in the second part, and use the second part as a clamping part to achieve a rigid structure.
The thin rubber film 51 is placed in the mechanical coupling area to compensate for casting tolerances in the upper or lower part, and thickness tolerances of corrosion protection coating. This thin film will insure a high friction of the respective parts and prevent possible rotation of the inlet/outlet parts. By separating the mechanical coupling area from the coupling sealing area, the above mentioned thin film may be squeezed and even ruptured, without causing any leakage. By performing a machining process on the above mentioned parts, and by adding a thin (rubber) film into the Victaulic type coupling area groove, the tolerances due to casting and surface coating can be controlled. This is important in order to achieve rigid coupling, and to control the compression of the gasket 37 between the first and second parts, as shown in
In
In addition, certain smaller areas of the skeleton ring may remain not covered by resilient material after the manufacturing process is completed (e.g. due to fabrication methods and limitations). These smaller non-covered areas may thus be exposed to water when the valve is in use. However, the sizes of these exposed areas of skeleton ring material are small and within the regulatory limits.
The invented sealing insert (20) is thus adapted for assembly into a cavity formed by the first part and the second part of the gate valve. The rigid skeleton (30) element is covered by a resilient material to such an extent that the areas of the sealing insert which under normal operating conditions are exposed to the water flowing through the valve, are substantially covered by said resilient material.
One or more of the sealing areas (29), wedge sealing (35), gaskets (31, 36, 37), static sealing (32) are formed or comprised by the resilient material.
The skeleton may be made of a metal, a plastic or a rubber material. The metal may be materials such as cast iron or steel.
The resilient material may be made of a plastic or a rubber material, e.g. a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE).
The resilient material may comprise a plastic which is vulcanised onto the skeleton, this is suitable if the skeleton comprises iron. The resilient material may also be attached to the skeleton by means of an adhesive, as generally known in the art.
The resilient material may also be attached to the skeleton by means of bonding on a molecular level.
The following combinations may be applicable:
Advantages with the metal skeleton/rubber coating combination include well proved manufacturing process, reliable result, extended service life. This material combination requires a primer, however, which is undesirable. Furthermore, the materials and manufacturing process is comparatively expensive.
The manufacturing process for the plastic skeleton/TPE coating combination is more straightforward. No primer is required and the price for the finished product is comparatively low. There is, however, limited experience data available for this combination.
The plastic skeleton/rubber coating combination will also require a primer, which is a disadvantage.
As shown in
Referring to
Turning now to the wedge 18, shown in one embodiment in
Turning now to
By using a polymer protection film, the stainless steel core could be made as a raw casting part at a low price, and the final product would yet obtain an acceptable finish. It is an added advantage, if the polymer material coating has a total adhesion to the stainless steel core. One advantage of this valve top is that it may easily be assembled and reassembled several times, in contrast to the known valve tops where the valve top packing box may be difficult to disassemble.
While the present invention has been illustrated and described with respect to a particular embodiment thereof, it should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications to this invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20032583 | Jun 2003 | NO | national |
This application is entitled to the benefit of and incorporates by reference essential subject matter disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/NO2004/000160 filed on Jun. 4, 2004 and Norway Patent Application No. 20032583 filed Jun. 6, 2003.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO04/00160 | 6/4/2004 | WO | 3/6/2006 |