Virtual reality computing devices, such as head mounted display (HMD) systems and handheld mobile devices (e.g. smart phones, tablet computers, etc.), may be configured to display a virtual reality environment to a user in the field of view of the user and/or a field of view of a camera of the device. Similarly, a mobile device may display such information using a camera viewfinder window.
This Background is provided to introduce a brief context for the Summary and Detailed Description that follow. This Background is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter nor be viewed as limiting the claimed subject matter to implementations that solve any or all of the disadvantages or problems presented above.
An HMD device operating in a real world physical environment is configured with a sensor package that enables determination of an intersection of a device user's projected gaze with a location in a virtual reality environment so that virtual objects can be placed into the environment with high precision. Surface reconstruction of the physical environment can be applied using data from the sensor package to determine the user's view position in the virtual world. A gaze ray originating from the view position is projected outward and a cursor or similar indicator is rendered on the HMD display at the ray's closest intersection with the virtual world such as a virtual object, floor/ground, etc. In response to user input, such as a gesture, voice interaction, or manipulation of a control (e.g., a button or other user interface object), a virtual object is placed at the point of intersection between the projected gaze ray and the virtual reality environment.
The present gaze-based virtual object placement can be used in a variety of applications and use scenarios and enables the user to easily position virtual objects at desired locations in the virtual environment by changing view position and/or gaze. For example, an HMD device user can place markers to indicate points of interest on virtual world terrain in a surveying or mapping application, or a user can place virtual objects such as avatars and game objects at particular positions in the virtual world as part of the gameplay in a gaming scenario.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure. It may be appreciated that the above-described subject matter may be implemented as a computer-controlled apparatus, a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as one or more computer-readable storage media. These and various other features may be apparent from a reading of the following Detailed Description and a review of the associated drawings.
Like reference numerals indicate like elements in the drawings. Elements are not drawn to scale unless otherwise indicated.
Users can typically explore, navigate, and move within a virtual reality environment rendered by an HMD device by moving (e.g., through some form of locomotion) within a corresponding real world, physical environment. In an illustrative example, as shown in
During the course of a given user experience with the HMD device 104, various new virtual objects can be introduced into the virtual reality environment. Any of a variety of objects may be introduced including those that may be integral to the experience such as an avatar, terrain, markers, flags, buildings, etc., or those that may be used to enhance or control an experience such as interactive elements including menus, widgets, notifications, etc. that may be used to facilitate a given user interface or user experience supported on the HMD device.
As shown in
In some implementations, the gaze ray may be projected so that the cursor can be rendered at some arbitrary point within the field of view 110. For example, the cursor can be located at a fixed position at or near the center of the field of view in typical scenarios. Because the field of view and view position are typically determined by tracking the position and orientation of the user's head (as described in more detail below) the user can position the cursor onto an object of interest within the virtual world using head movement alone to adjust the field of view.
In alternative implementations, the HMD device may be configured to project the gaze ray in a way that enables the cursor to be rendered at different points within a given field of view according to the position of the user's eyes. Eye position may be detected, for example, using inward facing sensors that may be incorporated into the HMD device 104. Such eye position detection is referred to as gaze tracking and is described in more detail below. Thus, the user can position the cursor in these alternative implementations by using combinations of head and eye movement. For example, the user may use head movement to locate a virtual object of interest within the field of view and then use eye movement to position the cursor on the object.
The HMD device can also be configured in some cases to provide an option to the user to select between fixed and variable cursor positioning, for example by respectively disabling and enabling eye tracking. For example, a fixed cursor relative to the field of view may suit some usage scenarios where head movement alone provides an effective way to position the cursor. In other usage scenarios, a combination of head and eye movement may be more beneficial. In general, utilization of either fixed or variable cursor positioning can enable virtual objects to be placed into the virtual world with a high degree of precision.
In typical implementations, the field of view 110 for the HMD device 104 can be relatively limited. Accordingly, there is potential for virtual objects that are being introduced into the virtual reality environment 700 to not fit into the user's field of view or to be clipped at an edge of the field of view. This may occur when the user interacts, for example, with relatively large virtual objects which may cause discomfort for the user and/or reduce the quality of the user experience. In other situations, a given virtual object may extend from the point of intersection in manner that causes clipping against an edge of the field of view and/or the user experience may be more effective when the virtual object is more centrally placed within the field of view.
Accordingly, in some implementations, the HMD device 104 may be configured to rotate the gaze ray from the view position from the original projection. Such rotation can generally be performed in any direction (e.g., left, right, up, down, or combinations thereof) to suit a given use case and the angle of rotation can vary. As illustratively shown in
The HMD device 104 is configured to obtain surface reconstruction data 1500, as shown in
As shown in
Method 1800 shown in
In step 1815, the reconstructed geometry of the physical environment is used to perform tracking of the user's head to determine a current field of view and view position of the virtual reality environment. In step 1820, a gaze ray is projected outward from the view position along a direction of the user's gaze. Gaze detection may also be implemented, for example, using inward facings sensors that are incorporated into the sensor package 1505 (
In step 1825, an intersection is identified between the projected gaze ray and the virtual reality environment. In step 1830, the HMD device exposes a user interface and user input is received. The user interface can be configured according to the needs of a given implementation, and may include physical or virtual controls that may be manipulated by the user and may support voice and/or gestures in some cases. In step 1835, the projected ray may be rotated downwards in some cases to prevent clipping of some virtual objects (e.g., large virtual objects) along a top edge of the field of view, for example, when the virtual object is so large that it cannot fit within the field of view. In some cases, the rotated projected ray is cast through a bottom portion of the field of view. In step 1840, responsively to the user input, a virtual object can be placed at the point of intersection.
Method 1900 shown in
In step 1915, the sensor package is used to dynamically track the user's gaze direction, for example using inward facing sensors. In step 1920, an intersection between a ray that is projected from the view position along the user's gaze direction and a point in the virtual reality environment within the field of view is located. In step 1925, the HMD device is operated to render a cursor at the located intersection. The rendering is typically performed dynamically so that as the user moves and the field of view and gaze direction change, the cursor position in the virtual reality environment is updated. In some cases in which a placed virtual object would be clipped in the field of view, the projected ray can be rotated downward, in step 1930, so that the object is not clipped by an upper edge of the current field of view when the object is placed at the intersection of the rotated ray and the virtual reality environment. In step 1935, the HMD device is operated to place a virtual object at the located intersection. In typical implementations, the placement is performed in response to user input to a UI that is exposed by the HMD device.
Method 2000 in
The current surface reconstruction model is utilized to determine the user's current field of view of the virtual reality environment in step 2015. In step 2020, a cursor is rendered at a point of intersection between the projected gaze ray and the virtual reality environment. In step 2025, a user input is received, for example at a UI exposed by the HMD device. In step 2030, the projected gaze ray can be rotated downward if a placed virtual object extends outside the field of view. In some implementations, the degree of rotation is sufficient to enable the virtual object to be placed in a manner that allows space in the field of view above the object to be unobstructed. In step 2035, a virtual object is placed at the point of intersection in response to the received user input.
Turning now to various illustrative implementation details, a virtual reality or mixed reality display device according to the present arrangement may take any suitable form, including but not limited to near-eye devices such as the HMD device 104 and/or other portable/mobile devices.
Display system 2100 comprises one or more lenses 2102 that form a part of a see-through display subsystem 2104, such that images may be displayed using lenses 2102 (e.g. using projection onto lenses 2102, one or more waveguide systems incorporated into the lenses 2102, and/or in any other suitable manner). Display system 2100 further comprises one or more outward-facing image sensors 2106 configured to acquire images of a background scene and/or physical environment being viewed by a user, and may include one or more microphones 2108 configured to detect sounds, such as voice commands from a user. Outward-facing image sensors 2106 may include one or more depth sensors and/or one or more two-dimensional image sensors. In alternative arrangements, as noted above, a virtual reality or mixed reality display system, instead of incorporating a see-through display subsystem, may display mixed reality images through a viewfinder mode for an outward-facing image sensor.
The display system 2100 may further include a gaze detection subsystem 2110 configured for detecting a direction of gaze of each eye of a user or a direction or location of focus, as described above. Gaze detection subsystem 2110 may be configured to determine gaze directions of each of a user's eyes in any suitable manner. For example, in the illustrative example shown, a gaze detection subsystem 2110 includes one or more glint sources 2112, such as infrared light sources, that are configured to cause a glint of light to reflect from each eyeball of a user, and one or more image sensors 2114, such as inward-facing sensors, that are configured to capture an image of each eyeball of the user. Changes in the glints from the user's eyeballs and/or a location of a user's pupil, as determined from image data gathered using the image sensor(s) 2114, may be used to determine a direction of gaze.
In addition, a location at which gaze lines projected from the user's eyes intersect the external display may be used to determine an object at which the user is gazing (e.g. a displayed virtual object and/or real background object). Gaze detection subsystem 2110 may have any suitable number and arrangement of light sources and image sensors. In some implementations, the gaze detection subsystem 2110 may be omitted.
The display system 2100 may also include additional sensors. For example, display system 2100 may comprise a global positioning system (GPS) subsystem 2116 to allow a location of the display system 2100 to be determined This may help to identify real world objects, such as buildings, etc. that may be located in the user's adjoining physical environment.
The display system 2100 may further include one or more motion sensors 2118 (e.g., inertial, multi-axis gyroscopic or acceleration sensors) to detect movement and position/orientation/pose of a user's head when the user is wearing the system as part of an augmented reality HMD device. Motion data may be used, potentially along with eye-tracking glint data and outward-facing image data, for gaze detection, as well as for image stabilization to help correct for blur in images from the outward-facing image sensor(s) 2106. The use of motion data may allow changes in gaze location to be tracked even if image data from outward-facing image sensor(s) 2106 cannot be resolved.
In addition, motion sensors 2118, as well as microphone(s) 2108 and gaze detection subsystem 2110, also may be employed as user input devices, such that a user may interact with the display system 2100 via gestures of the eye, neck and/or head, as well as via verbal commands in some cases. It may be understood that sensors illustrated in
The display system 2100 can further include a controller 2120 having a logic subsystem 2122 and a data storage subsystem 2124 in communication with the sensors, gaze detection subsystem 2110, display subsystem 2104, and/or other components through a communications subsystem 2126. The communications subsystem 2126 can also facilitate the display system being operated in conjunction with remotely located resources, such as processing, storage, power, data, and services. That is, in some implementations, an HMD device can be operated as part of a system that can distribute resources and capabilities among different components and subsystems.
The storage subsystem 2124 may include instructions stored thereon that are executable by logic subsystem 2122, for example, to receive and interpret inputs from the sensors, to identify location and movements of a user, to identify real objects using surface reconstruction and other techniques, and dim/fade the display based on distance to objects so as to enable the objects to be seen by the user, among other tasks.
The display system 2100 is configured with one or more audio transducers 2128 (e.g., speakers, earphones, etc.) so that audio can be utilized as part of an augmented reality experience. A power management subsystem 2130 may include one or more batteries 2132 and/or protection circuit modules (PCMs) and an associated charger interface 2134 and/or remote power interface for supplying power to components in the display system 2100.
It may be appreciated that the depicted display devices 104 and 2100 are described for the purpose of example, and thus are not meant to be limiting. It is to be further understood that the display device may include additional and/or alternative sensors, cameras, microphones, input devices, output devices, etc. than those shown without departing from the scope of the present arrangement. Additionally, the physical configuration of a display device and its various sensors and subcomponents may take a variety of different forms without departing from the scope of the present arrangement.
The visor includes see-through front and rear shields 2304 and 2306 respectively that can be molded using transparent materials to facilitate unobstructed vision to the optical displays and the surrounding real world environment. Treatments may be applied to the front and rear shields such as tinting, mirroring, anti-reflective, anti-fog, and other coatings, and various colors and finishes may also be utilized. The front and rear shields are affixed to a chassis 2405 as depicted in the partially exploded view in
The sealed visor 2302 can physically protect sensitive internal components, including an optics display subassembly 2502 (shown in the disassembled view in
As shown in
The computing system 2800 includes a logic subsystem 2802 and a storage subsystem 2804. The computing system 2800 may optionally include a display subsystem 2806, an input subsystem 2808, a communication subsystem 2810, and/or other components not shown in
The logic subsystem 2802 includes one or more physical devices configured to execute instructions. For example, the logic subsystem 2802 may be configured to execute instructions that are part of one or more applications, services, programs, routines, libraries, objects, components, data structures, or other logical constructs. Such instructions may be implemented to perform a task, implement a data type, transform the state of one or more components, or otherwise arrive at a desired result.
The logic subsystem 2802 may include one or more processors configured to execute software instructions. Additionally or alternatively, the logic subsystem 2802 may include one or more hardware or firmware logic machines configured to execute hardware or firmware instructions. The processors of the logic subsystem 2802 may be single-core or multi-core, and the programs executed thereon may be configured for sequential, parallel, or distributed processing. The logic subsystem 2802 may optionally include individual components that are distributed among two or more devices, which can be remotely located and/or configured for coordinated processing. Aspects of the logic subsystem 2802 may be virtualized and executed by remotely accessible, networked computing devices configured in a cloud-computing configuration.
The storage subsystem 2804 includes one or more physical devices configured to hold data and/or instructions executable by the logic subsystem 2802 to implement the methods and processes described herein. When such methods and processes are implemented, the state of the storage subsystem 2804 may be transformed—for example, to hold different data.
The storage subsystem 2804 may include removable media and/or built-in devices. The storage subsystem 2804 may include optical memory devices (e.g., CD (compact disc), DVD (digital versatile disc), HD-DVD (high definition DVD), Blu-ray disc, etc.), semiconductor memory devices (e.g., RAM (random access memory), ROM (read only memory), EPROM (erasable programmable ROM), EEPROM (electrically erasable ROM), etc.) and/or magnetic memory devices (e.g., hard-disk drive, floppy-disk drive, tape drive, MRAM (magneto-resistive RAM), etc.), among others. The storage subsystem 2804 may include volatile, nonvolatile, dynamic, static, read/write, read-only, random-access, sequential-access, location-addressable, file-addressable, and/or content-addressable devices.
It may be appreciated that the storage subsystem 2804 includes one or more physical devices, and excludes propagating signals per se. However, in some implementations, aspects of the instructions described herein may be propagated by a pure signal (e.g., an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, etc.) using a communications medium, as opposed to being stored on a storage device. Furthermore, data and/or other forms of information pertaining to the present arrangement may be propagated by a pure signal.
In some embodiments, aspects of the logic subsystem 2802 and of the storage subsystem 2804 may be integrated together into one or more hardware-logic components through which the functionality described herein may be enacted. Such hardware-logic components may include field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), program-and application-specific integrated circuits (PASIC/ASICs), program-and application-specific standard products (PSSP/ASSPs), system-on-a-chip (SOC) systems, and complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), for example.
When included, the display subsystem 2806 may be used to present a visual representation of data held by storage subsystem 2804. This visual representation may take the form of a graphical user interface (GUI). As the present described methods and processes change the data held by the storage subsystem, and thus transform the state of the storage subsystem, the state of the display subsystem 2806 may likewise be transformed to visually represent changes in the underlying data. The display subsystem 2806 may include one or more display devices utilizing virtually any type of technology. Such display devices may be combined with logic subsystem 2802 and/or storage subsystem 2804 in a shared enclosure in some cases, or such display devices may be peripheral display devices in others.
When included, the input subsystem 2808 may include or interface with one or more user-input devices such as a keyboard, mouse, touch screen, or game controller. In some embodiments, the input subsystem may include or interface with selected natural user input (NUI) components. Such components may be integrated or peripheral, and the transduction and/or processing of input actions may be handled on-or off-board. Exemplary NUI components may include a microphone for speech and/or voice recognition; an infrared, color, stereoscopic, and/or depth camera for machine vision and/or gesture recognition; a head tracker, eye tracker, accelerometer, and/or gyroscope for motion detection and/or intent recognition; as well as electric-field sensing components for assessing brain activity.
When included, the communication subsystem 2810 may be configured to communicatively couple the computing system 2800 with one or more other computing devices. The communication subsystem 2810 may include wired and/or wireless communication devices compatible with one or more different communication protocols. As non-limiting examples, the communication subsystem may be configured for communication via a wireless telephone network, or a wired or wireless local-or wide-area network. In some embodiments, the communication subsystem may allow computing system 2800 to send and/or receive messages to and/or from other devices using a network such as the Internet.
Various exemplary embodiments of the present gaze-based object placement within a virtual reality environment are now presented by way of illustration and not as an exhaustive list of all embodiments. An example includes a method performed by a head mounted display (HMD) device that supports rendering of a virtual reality environment, comprising: obtaining sensor data describing a real world physical environment adjoining a user of the HMD device; using the sensor data, reconstructing a geometry of the physical environment; tracking the user's head and gaze in the physical environment using the reconstructed geometry to determine a field of view and view position; projecting a gaze ray outward from the view position; identifying an intersection between the projected gaze ray and the virtual reality environment; and placing a virtual object at the intersection within the current field in response to user input.
In another example, the sensor data includes depth data and further including generating the sensor data using a depth sensor and applying surface reconstruction techniques to reconstruct the physical environment geometry. In another example, the method further includes generating depth data using depth-from-stereo imaging analyses. In another example, the method further includes identifying an intersection between the projected gaze ray and the virtual reality environment that is closest to the HMD device. In another example, the method further includes exposing a user interface (UI) for receiving the user input, the UI providing user controls or supporting gesture recognition or voice recognition. In another example, the method further includes rotating the projected gaze ray so that a placed virtual object is not clipped along an edge of the field of view. In another example, the method further includes performing the rotating so that the gaze ray is projected through a bottom portion of the field of view. In another example, the method further includes performing the rotating when the placed object cannot be rendered to fit entirely within the field of view. In another example, the placed virtual object is an interactive element supporting a user interface or a user experience in which the interactive element is one of menu, widget, or notification. In another example, the method further using one or more inward facing sensors located in the HMD device to determine the gaze direction and projecting the gaze ray from the view position along a direction of the user's gaze.
A further example includes a head mounted display (HMD) device operable by a user in a physical environment, comprising: one or more processors; a display for rendering a virtual reality environment to the user, a field of view of the rendered virtual reality environment being variable depending at least in part on a pose of the user's head in the physical environment; a sensor package; and one or more memory devices storing computer-readable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, perform a method comprising the steps of: generating surface reconstruction data for at least a portion of the physical environment using the sensor package, dynamically tracking a view position of the user for the virtual reality environment using the surface reconstruction data, locating an intersection between a ray projected from the view position along the user's gaze direction and a point of the virtual reality environment within a current field of view, and operating the HMD device to render a cursor at the point of intersection.
In another example, the head mounted display (HMD) device further includes using the sensor package to dynamically track the gaze direction. In another example, the head mounted display (HMD) device further includes a user interface and operating the HMD device to place a virtual object at the point of intersection responsively to a user input to the UI. In another example, the head mounted display (HMD) device further includes dynamically repositioning the cursor as the field of view or gaze direction changes. In another example, the head mounted display (HMD) device further includes modeling the physical environment using a surface reconstruction data pipeline that implements a volumetric method creating multiple overlapping surfaces that are integrated. In another example, the head mounted display (HMD) device further includes rotating the projected ray downward so that a placed virtual object, when rendered on the display, is not clipped by an upper edge of the current field of view.
A further example includes one or more computer readable memories storing computer-executable instructions for rendering a virtual reality environment within a variable field of view of a head mounted display (HMD) device located in a real world environment, the method comprising the steps of: using data from a sensor package incorporated into the HMD device to a) dynamically generate a surface reconstruction model of the real world environment and b) generate a gaze ray that is projected from a view position of a user of the HMD device; determining a field of view of the virtual reality environment using the model; receiving an input to the HMD device from the user; and placing a virtual object within the field of view at a point of intersection between the gaze ray and the virtual reality environment in response to the received user input.
In another example, the one or more computer readable memories further include tracking a gaze direction of the user, projecting the gaze ray from the view position along the gaze direction, and rendering a cursor within the field of view at a point of intersection of the gaze ray and the virtual reality environment. In another example, the one or more computer readable memories further include determining when a placed virtual object extends outside the field of view and rotating the gaze ray in response to the determining. In another example, the one or more computer readable memories further include rotating the gaze ray at an angle that is sufficient to provide a portion of the field of view that is unobstructed by the placed virtual object.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application claims benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/029,351 filed Jul. 25, 2014, entitled “Head Mounted Display Experiences” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5748189 | Trueblood | May 1998 | A |
5819206 | Horton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5877748 | Redlich | Mar 1999 | A |
6012926 | Hodges et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023275 | Horvitz | Feb 2000 | A |
6329986 | Cheng | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6396495 | Parghi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396497 | Reichlen | May 2002 | B1 |
6529331 | Massof et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552698 | Walker | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6741241 | Jaubert et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6804607 | Wood | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6898266 | Griffith | May 2005 | B2 |
7274380 | Navab et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7386799 | Clanton et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7400322 | Urbach | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7486817 | Yanagawa et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7538775 | Ishihara | May 2009 | B2 |
7542210 | Chirieleison, Sr. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7557774 | Baudisch et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8049750 | Gloudemans et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8266536 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8405680 | Cardoso Lopes | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8576247 | Avkarogullari et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611015 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8751969 | Matsuda et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754931 | Gassel et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8780014 | Border et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793620 | Stafford | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9372345 | Fujimaki | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9443352 | Glover | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9645397 | da Veiga et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9776460 | Mita | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9858720 | da Veiga et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865089 | Burns et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9904055 | Burns et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010035845 | Zwern | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020044152 | Abbott et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020154214 | Scallie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181115 | Massof et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030091226 | Cahill | May 2003 | A1 |
20050024388 | Takemoto | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050143887 | Kinoshita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179703 | Johnson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060050070 | Matsui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092178 | Tanguay, Jr. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095207 | Reid | May 2006 | A1 |
20060241827 | Fukuchi | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060284792 | Foxlin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070057946 | Albeck | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116326 | Aonuma et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132662 | Morita | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080174659 | McDowall | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195315 | Hu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080284864 | Kotake | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090160985 | Javidi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167785 | Wong | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189974 | Deering | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199275 | Brock et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090325699 | Delgiannidis | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100208035 | Pinault | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208057 | Meier | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226017 | Spaller | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315413 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029903 | Schooleman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043627 | Werling et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110140994 | Noma | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110242090 | Keating et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120011445 | Gilboa | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052917 | Kim | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056876 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068913 | Bar-Zeev et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092328 | Flaks | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113092 | Bar-Zeev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120195471 | Newcombe | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237116 | Xiao | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249741 | Maciocci | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120309522 | Westlund et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313839 | Smithwick | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327116 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130044128 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050258 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050432 | Perez et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083007 | Geisner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130083018 | Geisner | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088413 | Raffle et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093789 | Liu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130127860 | Hadap | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127980 | Haddick | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137076 | Perez et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141419 | Mount | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147686 | Clavin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130194259 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222589 | Lalonde et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222647 | Ishihara | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257751 | Stafford | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257899 | Baron et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287290 | Owechko | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300637 | Smits et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307855 | Lamb et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326364 | Latta et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328927 | Mount et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335301 | Wong | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335303 | Maciocci et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336629 | Mulholland et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342564 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342570 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002444 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019874 | Li et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049559 | Fleck et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098009 | Prest | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104142 | Bickerstaff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140125557 | Issayeva et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140130041 | Luxenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132484 | Pandey | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132715 | Raghoebardayal | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139639 | Wagner | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140579 | Takemoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145988 | Ishizawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140168264 | Harrison | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176530 | Path re | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184550 | Hennessey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204117 | Kinnebrew et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221090 | Mutschler et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240351 | Scavezze et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253605 | Border et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267400 | Mabbutt | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317555 | Choi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140363073 | Shirakyan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372957 | Keane et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150070274 | Morozov | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091780 | Lyren | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150138081 | Iwatsu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138239 | Kim | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143459 | Molnar | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145887 | Forutanpour | May 2015 | A1 |
20150153833 | Pinault et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178956 | Davis | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186016 | Li | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205106 | Norden | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243078 | Watson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150261293 | Wilairat | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150325176 | Koyama | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355709 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150355735 | Matsuda | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150356788 | Abe | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011724 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025981 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025982 | Sutherland et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027212 | Da veiga et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027213 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027214 | Memmott et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027215 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027216 | da veiga et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027217 | da veiga et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027218 | Salter et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160314622 | Davis et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20180003982 | Burns et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180101994 | Da veiga et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1922651 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101162524 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101529899 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101813976 | Aug 2010 | CN |
102419631 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102473068 | May 2012 | CN |
102598677 | Jul 2012 | CN |
101540020 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102663722 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102918568 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102959616 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103064188 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103076875 | May 2013 | CN |
103091844 | May 2013 | CN |
103377476 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103460256 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103487937 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103493106 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103635849 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103761085 | Apr 2014 | CN |
106662924 | May 2017 | CN |
1521482 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2164045 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2013238693 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2009128781 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2013029097 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013052855 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013057649 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013085193 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013155217 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014188798 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015108887 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Oct. 28, 2015, (10 Pages total). |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041864”, dated Oct. 26, 2015, (11 Pages total). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Jan. 25, 2016, 12 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Nov. 27, 2015, 12 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Jul. 1, 2016, (6 Pages). |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 8 Pages. |
Duchowski, Andrew, “Chapter 7—Head-Mounted System Software Development”, In Book Eye Tracking Methodology, Theory and Practice, Part 2, Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 69-86. (18 pages total). |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Jun. 13, 2016, 5 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Jun. 20, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“Gaze Awareness for Videoconferencing: A Software Approach” (by Jim Gemmell and Kentaro Toyama, Microsoft; C. Lawrence Zitnick and Thomas Kang, Carnegie Mellon University; Steven Seitz, University of Washington, in 1070-986X/00/$10.00 © 2000 IEEE) (10 pages total). |
Nilsen, et al., “Tankwar—Tabletop War Gaming in Augmented Reality”, In 2nd International Workshop on Pervasive Gaming Applications, PerGames. vol. 5, Retrieved on: Sep. 12, 2014, 5 pages. |
Murray, et al., “Comparison of Head Gaze and Head and Eye Gaze within an Immersive Environment”, In Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications , Oct. 2, 2006, 7 pages. |
Steptoe, et al., “Eye Tracking for Avatar Eye Gaze Control during Object-Focused Multiparty Interaction in Immersive Collaborative Virtual Environments”, In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Mar. 14, 2009, 8 pages. |
Suma, et al., “Sharing Space in Mixed and Virtual Reality Environments Using a Low-Cost Depth Sensor”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Virtual Innovation, Mar. 19, 2011, 2 pages. |
Ponto, et al., “Perceptual Calibration for Immersive Display Environments”, In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, Issue 4, Apr. 2013, pp. 691-700, 10 pages. |
Li, et al., “On the Anisotropy of Perceived Ground Extents and the Interpretation of Walked Distance as a Measure of Perception”, In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 39, Issue 2, Apr. 2013, 33 pages. |
Li, et al., “The Underestimation of Egocentric Distance: Evidence from Frontal Matching Tasks”, In Proceedings of Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, Oct. 2011, 15 pages. |
Howe, Bo, “Holographic Computer Monitor”, Published on: Aug. 18, 2010, Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlxj7fY-38, 2 pages. |
Angley, Natalie, “Glasses to make you a real-life Tony Stark”, Published on: Oct. 31, 2013, Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/31/tech/innovation/meta-augmented-reality-glasses/, 4 pages. |
Hiner, Jason, “Future iPhone concept: Laser keyboard and holographic display”, Published on: Aug. 31, 2011, Available at: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tech-sanity-check/future-iphone-concept-laser-keyboard-and-holographic-display/, 6 pages. |
Chen, Jian, “A Virtual Environment System for the Comparative Study of Dome and HMD”, In Master Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, May, 2002, 104 pages. |
McCarthy, Mike, “HP intros new versions of its mobile and tower workstations”, Retrieved on: Sep. 11, 2014, Available at: http://postperspective.com/hp-intros-new-versions-pro-offerings/, 5 pages. |
Nakashima, et al., “A 2D-3D Integrated Environment for Cooperative Work”, In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Nov. 7, 2005, 7 pages. |
Pierce, et al., “Image Plane Interaction Techniques in 3D Immersive Environments”, In Proceedings of the symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, Apr. 30, 1997, 10 pages. |
Regenbrecht, et al., “Interaction in a Collaborative Augmented Reality Environment”, In Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 20, 2002, 2 pages. |
“Touchscreen interface for seamless data transfer between the real and virtual worlds”, Published on: Apr. 15, 2013, Available at: http://www.diginfo.tv/v/13/0025-r-en.php, 8 pages. |
Urban, John, “Five Free Tools for Multi-Monitor Computer Set-Ups”, Published on: Sep. 16, 2009, Available at: http://sixrevisions.com/tools/five-free-tools-for-multi-monitor-computer-set-ups/, 17 pages. |
Steinicke, et al. “Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays”, In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Jul. 2011, 12 pages. |
Hogue, David, “What Are Index and Alpha Transparency?”, Published on: Mar. 3, 2011, Available at: http://www.idux.com/2011/02/27/what-are-index-and-alpha-transparency/, 14 pages. |
Jimenez, et al., “Gaze-based Interaction for Virtual Environments”, In Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 14, Issue 19, Nov. 2008, 14 pages. |
Kinoshita, et al., “A Fast and Robust 3D Head Pose and Gaze Estimation System”, In 8th IEEE International Conference onAutomatic Face & Gesture Recognition, Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Peterson, et al., “Evaluation of Alternative Label Placement Techniques in Dynamic Virtual Environments”, In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Smart Graphics, May 22, 2009, 7 pages. |
Kuhl, et al., “HMD Calibration and its Effects on Distance Judgments”, In Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, Aug. 9, 2008, 24 pages. |
Kim. et al., “3D Reconstruction of Stereo Images for Interaction between Real and Virtual Worlds”, In Proceedings of the Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 7, 2003, 9 pages. |
Amar, et al., “Synthesizing Reality for Realistic Physical Behavior of Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality Applications for Smart-Phones”, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Mar. 16, 2013, pp. 123-124, 2 pages. |
Lavoie, et al., “Constructing 3D Virtual Reality Objects from 2D Images of Real Objects Using NURBS”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces, and Measurement Systems Ostuni, Jun. 25, 2007, 8 pages. |
Nóbrega, et al., “Magnetic Augmented Reality: Virtual Objects in Your Space”, In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, May 21, 2012, pp. 332-335, 4 pages. |
Izadi, et al., “KinectFusion: Real-time 3D Reconstruction and Interaction Using a Moving Depth Camera”, In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Oct. 16, 2011, 10 pages. |
Kalkofen, et al., “Visualization Techniques for Augmented Reality”, In Proceedings of Handbook of Augmented Reality, Jul. 13, 2011, pp. 65-98, 34 pages. |
Maimone, et al., “Computational Augmented Reality Eyeglasses”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 1, 2013, 10 pages. |
“Virtual Reality (VR) and Mixed Reality (MR) technologies”, Retrieved on: Sep. 12, 2014, Available at: http://www.vr-hyperspace.eu/about-vr-hyperspace/technology/77-virtual-reality-vr-and-mixed-reality-mr-technologies (5 pages total). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Oct. 30, 2015, (11 pages total). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT1US2015/041867”, dated Nov. 25, 2015, (11 Pages total). |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”,dated Nov. 16, 2015, (12 Pages total). |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Nov. 16, 2015, (11 Pages total). |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Oct. 19, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Oct. 27, 2016, 9 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Dec. 21, 2017, 42 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,047”, dated Jan. 25, 2018, 85 Pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 41 pages. |
Final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/722,942, dated Nov. 24, 2017, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 9 pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated May 2, 2018, 41 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated May 17, 2018, 35 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Oct. 13, 2017, 36 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Oct. 5, 2018, 32 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 29 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,447”, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 20 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Jan. 12, 2017, 15 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Jun. 26, 2017, 15 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Jun. 23, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 20 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Jan. 22, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Sep. 14, 2017, 24 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 21 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Mar. 20, 2017, 24 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Jul. 12, 2016, 20 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Aug. 29, 2017, 12 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 56 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Mar. 23, 2017, 57 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 50 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,227”, dated Aug. 12, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/722,942”, dated Sep. 19, 2018, 11 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/722,942”, dated Jul. 11, 2017, 11 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/722,942”, dated Apr. 4, 2018, 12 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Feb. 7, 2017, 37 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Jul. 24, 2017, 38 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 29 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 17 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041327.6”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 20 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041345.4”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 19 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041348.8”, dated Nov. 30, 2018, 15 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041349.2”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 19 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041369.X”, dated Dec. 6, 2018, 10 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0000546”, dated Apr. 13, 2018, 14 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0000546”, dated Sep. 14, 2018, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0000546”, dated Jan. 25, 2017, 2 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Dec. 13, 2018, 15 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041151.4”, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041403.3”, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 18 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15748368.6”, dated Feb. 15, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15748367.8”, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041217.X”, dated Feb. 28, 2019, 22 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15748369.4”, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15763668.9”, dated Apr. 9, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041327.6”, dated Jun. 11, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041345.4”, dated Jun. 11, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,397”, dated Jun. 26, 2019, 15 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041348.8”, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041349.2”, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041403.3”, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 7 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160026242 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62029351 | Jul 2014 | US |