The present invention is a door mortise lock. The mechanism described is related to a latch used in a door to constrain it closed, when in an extended position, and allow door opening when in a retracted position.
Latches carried by a door to effect secure locking are very common. They typically include a latch bolt enclosed within a housing. Many are rotationally actuated and bi-directional. This means they are actuated by either clockwise or counter-clockwise handle rotation. In a neutral or un-actuated position, the bolt is extended from the housing and precludes door opening when the bolt is engaged in a typical strike plate. Handle rotation retracts the latch bolt to disengage the bolt from the strike plate and allow the door to be opened. Typically, closing of the door imparts a force upon the bolt by the strike plate or door frame to retract the bolt without manual handle rotation being required.
Many latch mechanisms today rely on cams for actuation. This involves the generation of friction between cam body surfaces and creates wear under conditions of cyclical use. Additionally, some mechanisms require significant handle rotation (more than 45°) to retract the bolt within its housing. What is needed, therefore, is a latch mechanism which retracts the latch bolt with less than 45° rotation and eliminates frictional wear typically brought to bear upon sliding cam surfaces. The present invention offers solutions to these problems.
The present invention is a mortise lock which employs a gear latch bolt mechanism which includes at least one toothed member received in a latch-housing. A handle is mechanically coupled to a drive member for moving the bolt between an extended and a retracted position. The mechanism also includes a driven member, actuable by the drive member, which acts upon the bolt to move it from a first, extended position to a second, retracted position. Both the drive member and the driven member may employ involute gear profiles. As a result, rotation of the drive member imparts force to the driven member with only minimal frictional force at a location of engagement. The driven member then linearly retracts the bolt by means of a projection extending from the driven member into a receiver of the bolt.
The mechanism described can incorporate two sets of drive and driven members, which can be substantially identical to each other, to retract the bolt. Such a construction allows for bi-directional actuation (that is, either clockwise or counter-clockwise handle rotation) to retract the bolt. It will be understood that the handle rotational angle required to retract the bolt is a function of the geometry of the driven member related to the bolt.
The present invention is thus an improved mortise lock mechanism. More specific features and advantages obtained in view of those features will become apparent with reference to the Detailed Description of the Invention, appended claims and accompanying drawing figures.
Referring to
The latch assembly is more specifically described referring to
The discussion above applies to
The function of the latch is described below. The cover is not shown in
Referring to
It will be understood that the driven member, irrespective of which force transmission train is operative, functions as a first-class lever. That is, forces applied to an extension of the driven member by the corresponding drive member extending on a side of the axis of rotation of the driven member opposite that at which a second extension of the driven member engages the bolt within its receiver. This is in contrast to prior art devices. Consequently, the present invention achieves a high level of efficiency.
It will be understood that this disclosure, in many respects, is only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size, material, and arrangement of parts without exceeding the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is as defined in the language of the appended claims.
This is a regular application filed under 35 U.S.C. §111(a) claiming priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e)(1), of provisional application Ser. No. 60/983,442, previously filed Oct. 29, 2007 under 35 U.S.C. §111(b).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1831067 | Hansen | Nov 1931 | A |
2222411 | Kaiser | Nov 1940 | A |
2293645 | Falk | Aug 1942 | A |
2401559 | Falk | Jun 1946 | A |
2673758 | Schlage | Mar 1954 | A |
2741502 | Crandell | Apr 1956 | A |
2770480 | Linton | Nov 1956 | A |
2988389 | Wilson | Jun 1961 | A |
3160432 | Crepinsek | Dec 1964 | A |
3175376 | Cantwell | Mar 1965 | A |
4974883 | Jans | Dec 1990 | A |
5020836 | Su | Jun 1991 | A |
5259652 | Adams et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5342101 | Shih | Aug 1994 | A |
5647617 | Kajuch | Jul 1997 | A |
5690372 | Jans | Nov 1997 | A |
6526787 | Ming-Chih | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536248 | Fan | Mar 2003 | B1 |
20070007773 | Berkseth et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090113957 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60983442 | Oct 2007 | US |