All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Pumping systems are important for chemical analysis, drug delivery, and analyte sampling. However, traditional pumping systems can be inefficient due to a loss of power incurred by movement of a mechanical piston. For example, as shown in
Some diaphragm designs try to compensate for such inefficiencies by using a stiffer material to avoid having the diaphragm freely flexing. This approach, however, makes the diaphragm more difficult to actuate and tends to still lower efficiency. Other conventional diaphragm designs, such as a rolling diaphragm, are easy to actuate but have larger dead volumes.
Traditional systems can also be disadvantageous because they cannot precisely deliver small amounts of delivery fluid, partly because a mechanical piston cannot be accurately stopped mid-stroke.
Moreover, traditional pumping systems can be disadvantageous because they are often large, cumbersome, and expensive. Part of the expense and size results from the fact that the current pumping systems require the engine, pump, and controls to be integrated together.
Accordingly, a pumping system is needed that is highly efficient, precise, and/or modular.
In general, in one aspect, a fluid delivery system includes a first chamber, a second chamber, and a third chamber, a pair of electrodes, a porous dielectric material, an electrokinetic fluid, and a flexible member including a gel between two diaphragms. The pair of electrodes is between the first chamber and the second chamber. The porous dielectric material is between the electrodes. The electrokinetic fluid is configured to flow through the porous dielectric material between the first and second chambers when a voltage is applied across the pair of electrodes. The flexible member fluidically separates the second chamber from the third chamber and is configured to deform into the third chamber when the electrokinetic fluid flows form the first chamber into the second chamber.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The flexible member can be configured to deform into the second chamber when the electrokinetic fluid moves from the second chamber to the first chamber. A void can occupy 5-50% of a space between a deformable portion of the first and second diaphragms. The gel material can be adhered to the first and second diaphragms. The gel material can be separable from the first or second diaphragms when a leak forms in the first or second diaphragms. The gel material can include silicone, acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), silicone PSA, or polyurethane. The diaphragm material can include a thin-film polymer. A ratio of a diameter of the third chamber to a height of the third chamber can be greater than 5/1. A thickness of the gel in a neutral pumping position can be greater than a height of the third chamber. The flexible member can be configured to pump a deliver fluid from the third chamber when the voltage is applied across the first and second electrodes. The flexible member can be configured to stop deforming substantially instantaneously when the electrokinetic fluid stops flowing between the first and second chambers. The flexible member can be configured to at least partially conform to an interior shape of the third chamber. The gel can be configured to compress between the first and second diaphragms when the flexible member pumps fluid from the third chamber.
In general, in one aspect, a fluid delivery system includes a pump module having a pumping chamber therein, a pump engine configured to generate power to pump delivery fluid from the pumping chamber, and a flexible member. The flexible member fluidically separates the pump module from the pump engine and is configured to deflect into the pumping chamber when pressure is applied to the flexible member from the pump engine. The flexible member is configured to transfer more than 80% of an amount of power generated by the pump engine to pump delivery fluid from the pumping chamber.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The pump engine can be an electrokinetic engine. The flexible member can include a gel between two diaphragms.
In general, in one aspect, a method of pumping fluid includes applying a first voltage to an electrokinetic engine to deflect a flexible member in a first direction to draw fluid into a pumping chamber of an electrokinetic pump, the flexible member comprising a gel between two diaphragms; and applying a second voltage opposite to the first voltage to the electrokinetic engine to deflect the flexible member into the pumping chamber to pump the fluid out of the pumping chamber.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The method can further include stopping the application of the second voltage and stopping the pumping of fluid out of the pumping chamber substantially instantaneously with stopping the application of the second voltage. The method can further include compressing the gel between the first and second diaphragms when the flexible member is deflected into the pumping chamber. The method can further include applying the second voltage until the flexible member substantially conforms to an interior surface of the pumping chamber.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and figures to provide an understanding of various embodiments of the invention. Certain well-known details, associated electronics and devices are not set forth in the following disclosure to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the various embodiments of the invention. Further, those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will understand that they can practice other embodiments of the invention without one or more of the details described below. Finally, while various processes are described with reference to steps and sequences in the following disclosure, the description is for providing a clear implementation of particular embodiments of the invention, and the steps and sequences of steps should not be taken as required to practice this invention.
The diaphragms 152, 154 of the gel coupling 112 can be aligned substantially parallel with one another when in the neutral position shown in
The gel-like material 150 can include a gel, i.e. a dispersion of liquid within in a cross linked solid that exhibits no flow when in the steady state. The liquid in the gel advantageously makes the gel soft and compressible while the cross-linked solid advantageously makes the gel have adhesive properties such that it will both stick to itself (i.e. hold a shape) and stick to the diaphragm material. The gel-like material 150 can have a hardness of between 5 and 60 durometer, such as between 10 and 20 durometer, for example 15 durometer. Further, the gel-like material 150 can have adhesive properties such that it is attracted to the material of both diaphragms 152, 154, which can advantageously help synchronize the two diaphragms 152, 154. In some embodiments, the gel-like material 150 is a silicone gel, such as blue silicone gasket material from McMaster-Carr™ or Gel-Pak® X8. Alternatively, the gel-like material 150 can include a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), such as 3M™ acrylic PSA or 3M™ silicone PSA. In other embodiments, the gel-like material can be a low durometer polyurethane.
The gel-like material 150 can have a thickness that is low enough to remain relatively incompressible, but high enough to provide proper adhering properties. For example, the gel-like material 150 can be between 0.01 to 0.1 inches thick, such as between 0.01 and 0.06 inches thick. In one embodiment, the flexible member, including the gel, has a thickness that is greater than the height of the pumping chamber 122. For example, the thickness of the gel coupling 112 can be approximately 1.5 to 2 times the height of the pumping chamber 122. The gel-like material can have a Poisson's ratio of approximately 0.5 such that, when compressed in one direction, it expands nearly or substantially the same amount in a second direction. Further, the gel-like material 150 can be chemically stable when in contact with the diaphragms 152, 154 and can be insoluble with water, pump fluids, or delivery fluids.
Referring to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the gel coupling 112 can be located within a fixed volume space, such as the chamber 122, so that movement of the gel coupling 112 is limited by the fixed volume. In some embodiments, the expanded shapes of the diaphragms 152, 154 limit the amount of movement of the gel coupling 112. For example, the diaphragms 152, 154 can include a thin polymer with a low bending stiffness but a high membrane stiffness such that the gel coupling 112 can only move a set distance. Having a shaped diaphragm can be advantageous because the shaped diaphragm undergoes little stretching, and stretching can problematically cause the gel-like material to decouple from the diaphragm after several cycles of stretching.
The gel coupling 112 can be configured to move only based upon the amount of power supply by the engine 193. That is, because the gel coupling 112 is pliable and has little inertia and mechanical stiffness to overcome, it can stop substantially instantaneously when the engine 193 stops generating power. The gel coupling 112 will only have to overcome a small local pressure in order to actuate the drive volume and/or stop pumping. As a result, referring to
In one embodiment, referring to
The pump 391 further includes a third chamber 122. The third chamber 122 can include a delivery fluid, such as a drug, e.g., insulin. A supply cartridge 142 can be connected to the third chamber 102 for supplying the delivery fluid to the third chamber 122, while a delivery cartridge 144 can be connected to the third chamber 122 for delivering the delivery fluid from the third chamber 122, such as to a patient. The gel coupling 112 can separate the delivery fluid in the third chamber 122 and the pump fluid in the second chamber 104.
The pump system 300 can be used to deliver fluid from the supply cartridge 142 to the delivery cartridge 144 at set intervals. To start delivery of fluid, a voltage correlating to a desired flow rate and pressure profile of the EK pump can be applied to the capacitive electrodes 108a and 108b from a power source. A controller can control the application of voltage. For example, the voltage applied to the EK engine 393 can be a square wave voltage. In one embodiment, voltage can be applied pulsatively, where the pulse duration and frequency can be adjusted to change the flow rate of EK pump system 300. The controller, in combination with check valves 562 and 564 and pressure sensors 552 and 554 can be used to monitor and adjust the delivery of fluid. Mechanisms for monitoring fluid flow are described further in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/465,902, filed herewith, and titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE CONTROL OF A RECIPROCATING ELECTROKINETIC PUMP.”
Referring to
Referring to
The EK pump system 300 can be used in a reciprocating manner by alternating the polarity of the voltage applied to capacitive electrodes 108a and 108b to repeatedly move the gel coupling 112 back and forth between the two chambers 122, 104. Doing so allows for delivery of a fluid, such as a medicine, in defined or set doses.
When the electrokinetic pump system 300 is used as a drug administration set, the supply chamber 142 can be connected to a fluid reservoir 141 and the delivery chamber 144 can be connected to a patient, and can include all clinically relevant accessories such as tubing, air filters, slide clamps, and back check valves, for example.
The electrokinetic pump system 300 can be configured to stop pumping in a particular direction, i.e. with negative or positive current, prior to the occurrence of a Faradaic process in the liquid. Accordingly, the electrodes will advantageously not generate gas or significantly alter the pH of the pump fluid. The set-up and use of various EK pump systems are further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,235,164 and 7,517,440, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Referring to
As shown in
In one embodiment, shown in
Referring to
Advantageously, having a gel coupling in a pump system can serve to separate any fluid in the engine, such as electrolyte in an EK pump, from delivery fluid in the pump. Separating the fluids ensures, for example, that pumping fluid will not accidentally be delivered to a patient.
Moreover, if a crack or hole is formed in either diaphragm of the gel coupling, the gel-like material will separate from the diaphragms. Since the gel-like material is lightly adhered to the diaphragm due to the adhesive properties of the gel material, such as through Van der Waal forces, it can separate from the diaphragms easily when wetted. Thus, if a diaphragm breaks or has a pin hole, either the pumping liquid or the delivery liquid can seep into the area where the gel is located. The liquid will then cause the gel and diaphragms to separate, thus causing the pump system to stop working. This penetration can be enhanced by having a void between the diaphragms filled with air, as the wetting agent can fill in the void to keep the pump system from working. Having the pump system stop working all together advantageously ensures that the pump is not used while delivering an incorrect amount of fluid, providing a failsafe mechanism.
The low durometer of the gel-like material advantageously allows for strong coupling between the two diaphragms of the gel coupling. That is, because the gel-like material has a low durometer and low stiffness, any change in shape of one diaphragm can be mimicked by the gel-like material and thus translated to the other diaphragm. The low durometer, in combination with the adhesive properties of the gel material, allows more than 50%, such as more than 80% or 90%, for example about 95%, of the power generated by the pump engine to be transferred to the delivery fluid. This high percentage is in contrast to mechanical pistons, which generally only transfer 40-45% of the power created by the piston. Further, because the gel coupling can transfer a high percentage of the power, the gel coupling is highly efficient. For example, a gel coupling in an electrokinetic pump system can pump at least 1200 ml of delivery fluid when powered by 2 AA alkaline batteries using 2800 mAh of energy. The gel coupling in an electrokinetic pump can further pump at least 0.15 mL, such as approximately 0.17 mL, of delivery fluid per 1 mAh of energy provided by the power source. Thus, for hydraulically actuated pumps such as an electrokinetic pump, the gel coupling can achieve nearly a one-to-one coupling such that whatever pump fluid is moved through the engine is transferred to the same amount of fluid being delivered from the pump.
Further, the gel coupling, when used with an electrokinetic pump system, advantageously allows for the pump to provide consistent and precise deliveries that are less than a full stroke. That is, because the EK engine delivers fluid only when a current is present, and because the amount of movement of the gel coupling is dependent only on the amount of pressure placed on it by the pump fluid rather than momentum, the gel coupling can be stopped “mid-stroke” during a particular point in the pumping phase. Stopping the gel coupling mid-stroke during a particular point in the pumping phase allows for a precise, but smaller amount of fluid to be delivered in each stroke. For example, less than 50%, such as less than 25%, for example approximately 10%, of the volume of the pumping chamber can be precisely delivered. The ability to deliver a precise smaller amount of fluid from an EK pumping system advantageously increases the dynamic range of flow rates available for the pump system.
The gel coupling is advantageously smaller than a mechanical piston, allowing the overall system to be smaller and more compact.
The coupling of the engine and pump together in the gel coupling advantageously allows the engine, such as the EK engine, and the pumping mechanism to be built separately and assembled together later. For example, as shown in
In addition to the gel coupling, the modularity of the overall system can be increased by having separable controls and pump systems. For example, referring to
Referring to
In use, the batteries 1203 supply voltage to the voltage regulators 1301. The voltage regulators 1301, under direction of the microprocessor 1305, supply the required amount of voltage to the H-bridge 1303. The H-Bridge 1303 in turn supplies voltage to the EK engine 1103 to start the flow of fluid through the pump. The amount of fluid that flow through the pump can be monitored and controlled by the pressure sensors 1152, 1154. Signals from the sensors 1152, 1154 to the amplifier 1307 in the control module can be amplified and then transmitted to the microprocessor 1305 for analysis. Using the pressure feedback information, the microprocessor 1305 can send the proper signal to the H-bridge to control the amount of time that voltage is applied to the engine 1103. The switches 1309 can be used to start and stop the engine 1103 as well as to switch between modes of pump module operation, e.g., from bolus to basal mode. The communications 1311 can be used to communicate with a computer (not shown), which can be used for diagnostic purposes and/or to program the microprocessor 1305.
As shown in
Referring to
The connectors 1192 can provide not only the mechanical connections between the pump module 1100 and control module 1200, but also the required electrical connections. For example, as shown in
The electrical and mechanical connections between the pump module 1100 and the control module 1200 are configured to function properly regardless of the type of pump module 1100 used. Accordingly, the same control module 1200 can be consecutively connected to different pump modules 1100. For example, the control module 1200 could be attached to a first pump module that produces a first flow rate range, such as a flow rate range 0.1-5 ml/hr. The control module 1200 could then be disconnected from the first pump module and attached to a second pump module that runs at the same flow rate range or at a second, different flow rate range, such as 1 ml-15 ml/hr. Allowing the control module 1200 to be connected to more than one pump allows the pump modules to be packaged and sold separately from the control module, resulting in lower-priced and lower-weight pump systems than are currently available. Moreover, using a single control module 1200 repeatedly allows the user to become more familiar with the system, thereby reducing the amount of human error incurred when using a pump system. Further, having a separate control module and pump module can advantageously allow, for example, for each hospital room to have a single controller than can be connected to any pump required for any patient.
Moreover, because the control module 1200 and the pump modules can be individually packaged and sold, the pump module can be pre-primed with a delivery fluid, such as a drug. Thus, the reservoir 1342 and the fluid paths can be filled with a delivery fluid prior to attachment to a control module 1200. When the pump module 1100 is pre-primed, substantially all of the air has been removed from the reservoir and fluid paths. The pump module 1100 can be pre-primed, for example, by the pump manufacturer, by a delivery fluid company, such as a pharmaceutical company, or by a pharmacist. Advantageously, by having a pre-primed pump module 1100, the nurse or person delivering the fluid to the patient does not have to fill the pump prior to use. Such avoidance can save time and provide an increased safety check on drug delivery.
Further, referring to
Like the module identifier 1772, the microprocessor 1305, can store information regarding the type of delivery fluid in the pump module, the total amount of delivery fluid in the pump module, the pump module's configured range of flow rates, patient information, calibration factors for the pump, the required operation voltage for the pump, prescription, bolus rate, basal rate, bolus volume, or bolus interval. The information stored in the microprocessor can be programmed into the module identifier by the person delivering the fluid to the patient.
The module identifier and the microprocessor 1305 can be configured to communicate communication signals 1310i, 1310j. The signals 1310i, 1310j can be used to ensure that the pump module 1100 runs properly (e.g., runs with the correct programmed cycles). Despite the additional sensors in this embodiment, a simple mechanical and electrical connection can still be made between the pump module 1100 and the control module 1200, such as using a DB9, molex, card edge, circular, contact, mini sub-d, usb, or micro usb.
In some embodiments, the microprocessor 1305 includes the majority of the programmed information, and the module identifier 1772 includes only the minimum amount of information required to identify the pump, such as the type and amount of drug in the particular pump as well as the required voltage levels. In this instance, the microprocessor 1305 can detect the required delivery program to run the pump module 1100 properly. In other embodiments, the module identifier 1772 includes the majority of the programmed information, and the microprocessor 1305 includes only the minimum amount of information required to properly run the pump. In this instance, the control module 1200 is essentially instructed by the module identifier 1772 regarding the required delivery program. In still another embodiment, each of the microprocessor 1305 and the module identifier 1772 include some or all of the required information and can coordinate to run the pump properly.
The information stored in the module identifier 1772 and microprocessor 1305 can further be used to prevent the pump module from delivering the wrong fluid to a patient. For example, if both the pump module 1772 and the microprocessor 1305 were programmed with patient information or prescription information, and the two sets of information did not match, then the microprocessor 1305 can be configured to prohibit the pump module from delivering fluid. In such instances, an audible or visible alarm may be triggered to alert the user that the pump system has been configured improperly. Such a “handshake” feature advantageously provides an increased safety check on the delivery system.
Although the gel coupling is described herein as being used with an electrokinetic pump system, it could be used in a variety of pumping systems, including hydraulic pumps, osmotic pumps, or pneumatic pumps. Moreover, in some embodiments, a gel as described herein could be used in addition to a piston, i.e. between the piston and the membrane, to provide enhanced efficiency by allowing there to be less unsupported area of the membrane due to the compressibility of the gel, as described above.
Further, the modularity aspects of the systems described herein, such as having a separate pump module and control module need not be limited to EK systems nor to systems having a gel coupling. Rather, the modularity aspects could be applicable to a variety of pumping systems and/or to a variety of movable members, such as a mechanical piston, separating the engine from the pump.
As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/482,889, filed May 5, 2011, and titled “GEL COUPLING FOR ELECTROKINETIC DELIVERY SYSTEMS,” and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/482,918, filed May 5, 2011, and titled “MODULAR DESIGN OF ELECTROKINETIC PUMPS,” both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1063204 | Kraft | Jun 1913 | A |
2615940 | Williams | Oct 1952 | A |
2644900 | Hardway, Jr. | Jul 1953 | A |
2644902 | Hardway, Jr. | Jul 1953 | A |
2661430 | Hardway, Jr. | Dec 1953 | A |
2841324 | Santeler | Jul 1958 | A |
2995714 | Hannah | Aug 1961 | A |
3143691 | Hurd | Aug 1964 | A |
3209255 | Estes et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3298789 | Mast | Jan 1967 | A |
3427978 | Hanneman et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3544237 | Walz | Dec 1970 | A |
3587227 | Weingarten et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3598506 | O'Neill | Aug 1971 | A |
3604417 | Stolzenberg | Sep 1971 | A |
3630957 | Rey et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3666379 | Mitchel et al. | May 1972 | A |
3682239 | Abu-Romia | Aug 1972 | A |
3714528 | Vail | Jan 1973 | A |
3739573 | Giner | Jun 1973 | A |
3814998 | Thoma et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3923426 | Theeuwes | Dec 1975 | A |
3952577 | Hayes et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4043895 | Gritzner | Aug 1977 | A |
4140122 | Kuhl et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4208031 | Jonak | Jun 1980 | A |
4209014 | Sefton | Jun 1980 | A |
4240889 | Yoda et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4316233 | Chato et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4383265 | Kohashi | May 1983 | A |
4396382 | Goldhaber | Aug 1983 | A |
4396925 | Kohashi | Aug 1983 | A |
4402817 | Maget | Sep 1983 | A |
4552277 | Richardson et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4558995 | Furukawa et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4634431 | Whitney et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4639244 | Rizk et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4687424 | Heimes | Aug 1987 | A |
4704324 | Davis et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4789801 | Lee | Dec 1988 | A |
4808152 | Sibalis | Feb 1989 | A |
4886514 | Maget | Dec 1989 | A |
4902278 | Maget et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4908112 | Pace | Mar 1990 | A |
4921041 | Akachi | May 1990 | A |
4999069 | Brackett et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004543 | Pluskal et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5037457 | Goldsmith et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5062770 | Story et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5087338 | Perry et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5116471 | Chien et al. | May 1992 | A |
5126022 | Soane et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5137633 | Wang | Aug 1992 | A |
5219020 | Akachi | Jun 1993 | A |
5260855 | Kaschmitter et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5279608 | Cherif Cheikh | Jan 1994 | A |
5288214 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296115 | Rocklin et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312389 | Theeuwes et al. | May 1994 | A |
5351164 | Grigortchak et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5418079 | Diethelm | May 1995 | A |
5523177 | Kosek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531575 | Lin | Jul 1996 | A |
5534328 | Ashmead et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5573651 | Dasgupta et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581438 | Halliop | Dec 1996 | A |
5628890 | Carter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632876 | Zanzucchi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658355 | Cottevieille et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683443 | Munshi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5766435 | Liao et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5858193 | Zanzucchi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862035 | Farahmandi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5888390 | Craig | Mar 1999 | A |
5891097 | Saito et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5942093 | Rakestraw et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942443 | Parce et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958203 | Parce et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
RE36350 | Swedberg et al. | Oct 1999 | E |
5961800 | McBride et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964997 | McBride | Oct 1999 | A |
5989402 | Chow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997708 | Craig | Dec 1999 | A |
6007690 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012902 | Parce | Jan 2000 | A |
6013164 | Paul et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019745 | Gray | Feb 2000 | A |
6019882 | Paul et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045933 | Okamoto | Apr 2000 | A |
6054034 | Soane et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068752 | Dubrow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068767 | Garguilo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074725 | Kennedy | Jun 2000 | A |
6086243 | Paul et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090251 | Sundberg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100107 | Lei et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106685 | McBride et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113766 | Steiner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126723 | Drost et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129973 | Martin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137501 | Wen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150089 | Schwartz | Nov 2000 | A |
6156273 | Regnier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159353 | West et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176962 | Soane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179586 | Herb et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6210986 | Arnold et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224728 | Oborny et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6255551 | Shapiro et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257844 | Stern | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260579 | Yokota et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267858 | Parce et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277257 | Paul et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287438 | Knoll | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287440 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290909 | Paul et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6320160 | Eidsnes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344120 | Haswell et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349740 | Cho et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379402 | Suhara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6406605 | Moles | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409698 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418966 | Loo | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6418968 | Pezzuto et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444150 | Arnold | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460420 | Paul et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464474 | Schluecker | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6472443 | Shepodd | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477410 | Henley et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495015 | Schoeniger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529377 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561208 | O'Connor et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572823 | Donahue et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6613211 | McCormick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6619925 | Ohkawa | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6655923 | Lisec et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685442 | Chinn et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689373 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695825 | Castles | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6719535 | Rakestraw et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729352 | O'Connor et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733244 | Fritsch et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6770182 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6770183 | Hencken et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6814859 | Koehler et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6843272 | Schoeniger et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6872292 | Theeuwes et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878473 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881312 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6905583 | Wainright et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6942018 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952962 | Hasselbrink et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962658 | Neyer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6994151 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7094464 | Mao et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101947 | Schlenoff et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7147955 | Adams | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7207982 | Dionne et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217351 | Krumme | May 2007 | B2 |
7231839 | Huber et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235164 | Anex et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7258777 | Paul et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267753 | Anex et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7364647 | Paul et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371229 | Theeuwes et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7399398 | Rakestraw et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7429317 | Paul | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7470267 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7517440 | Anex et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521140 | Arnold et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7559356 | Paul et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7575722 | Arnold | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7867592 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875159 | Anex et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7898742 | Rodríguez Fernandez et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7981098 | Boehringer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8152477 | Anex et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8192604 | Anex et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8251672 | Saleki et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010008212 | Shepodd et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010052460 | Chien et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020048425 | McBride et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056639 | Lackritz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066639 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070116 | Ohkawa | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076598 | Bostaph et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089807 | Bluvstein et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020125134 | Santiago et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020166592 | Liu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187074 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187197 | Caruso et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187557 | Hobbs et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189947 | Paul et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195344 | Neyer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030044669 | Hidaka et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052007 | Paul et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061687 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114837 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030116738 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138678 | Preidel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030190514 | Okada et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198130 | Karp et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198576 | Coyne et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206806 | Paul et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215686 | DeFilippis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226754 | Le Febre | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232203 | Mutlu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040031756 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040070116 | Kaiser et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087033 | Schembri | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101421 | Kenny et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106192 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107996 | Crocker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040115731 | Hansen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118189 | Karp et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040129568 | Seul et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040163957 | Neyer et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040238052 | Karp et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040241004 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040241006 | Taboryski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247450 | Kutchinsky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040248167 | Quake et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014134 | West et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050161326 | Morita et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166980 | Unger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050235733 | Holst et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252772 | Paul et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060127238 | Mosier et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060266650 | Han et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070062250 | Krulevitch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062251 | Anex | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066939 | Krulevitch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066940 | Karunaratne et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093752 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093753 | Krulevitch et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129792 | Picart et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148014 | Anex et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070224055 | Anex et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243084 | Vogeley | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080033338 | Smith | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080152507 | Bohm | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154187 | Krulevitch et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173545 | Anex et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243096 | Svedman | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249469 | Selvaganapathy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090035152 | Butterfield | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036867 | Glejboel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090308752 | Evans et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090311116 | Bai et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100096266 | Kim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100063 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124678 | Meschter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100304192 | Chan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304252 | Chan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312202 | Henley et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110031268 | Anex et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037325 | Ciocanel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112492 | Bharti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120219430 | Anex et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130156608 | Anex et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130211318 | Croizat et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140236109 | Greener | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2286429 | Jul 1998 | CN |
1817719 | Jul 1970 | DE |
0178601 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0421234 | Apr 1991 | EP |
1063204 | Dec 2000 | EP |
H02-229531 | Sep 1990 | JP |
03-087659 | Apr 1991 | JP |
U04-034468 | Mar 1992 | JP |
07269971 | Oct 1995 | JP |
09270265 | Oct 1997 | JP |
02-265598 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2008147087 | Jun 2010 | RU |
619189 | Aug 1978 | SU |
WO 9405354 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9639252 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9916162 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0004832 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0055502 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0079131 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0125138 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 02068821 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02086332 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004007348 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2006068959 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adamcyk et al., Characterization of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers by the Streaming Potential Method, Langmuir, vol. 20, 10517-10525, (Nov. 23, 2004). |
Adamson et al., Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, pp. 185-187; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY; (Aug. 4, 1997). |
Ananthakrishnan et al., Laminar Dispersion in capillaries; A.I. Ch.E. Journal, 11(6):1063-1072 (Nov. 1965). |
Aris, R.; On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London; Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences; vol. 235, No. 1200; pp. 67-77; (Apr. 10, 1956). |
Baquiran et al.; Lippincott's Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook; 2nd Ed; Lippincott; Philadelphia; (Jan. 1, 2001). |
Becker et al; Polymer microfabrication methods for microfluidic analytical applications; Electrophoresis; vol. 21; pp. 12-26; (Jan. 2000). |
Belfer et al.; Surface Modification of Commercial Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes; J. Membrane Sci.; 139; pp. 175-181; (Feb. 18, 1998). |
Bello et al; Electroosmosis of polymer solutions in fused silica capillaries; Electrophoresis; vol. 15; pp. 623-626; (May 1994). |
Bengtson, Harlan; The Orifice, Flow Nozzle, and Venturi Meter for Pipe Flow Measurement; Bright Hub; Engineering; Civil Engineering; Hydraulics; Ed. & Publ. by Lamar Stonecypher; 4 pages; (Aug. 24, 2010). |
Boerman et al.; Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of cancer: progress step by step; J. Nucl. Med.; vol. 44; No. 3; pp. 400-411; (Mar. 2003). |
Boger, D.; Demonstration of upper and lower Newtonian fluid behaviour in a pseudoplastic fluid; Nature; vol. 265; pp. 126-128 (Jan. 13, 1977). |
Braun et al.; Small-angle neutron scattering and cyclic voltammetry study on electrochemically oxidized and reduced pyrolytic carbon; Electrochimica Acta; vol. 49; pp. 1105-1112; (month unavailable 2004). |
Buchholz et al.; Microchannel DNA sequencing matrices with switchable viscosities; Electrophoresis; vol. 23; pp. 1398-1409; (May 2002). |
Burgreen et al.; Electrokinetic flow in ultrafine capillary slits; The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 68(95): pp. 1084-1091 (May 1964). |
Caruso et al.; Investigation of electrostatic interactions in polyelectrolyte multilayer fills: binding of anionic fluorescent probes to layers assemble onto colloids; Macromolecules; vol. 32(7); pp. 2317-2328 (month unavailable 1999). |
Chaiyasut et al.; Estimation of the dissociation constants for functional groups on modified and unmodified gel supports from the relationship between electroosmotic flow velocity and pH; Electrophoresis; vol. 22(7); pp. 1267-1272; (Apr. 2001). |
Chatwin et al.; The effect of aspect ratio on longitudinal diffusivity in rectangular channels; J. Fluid Mech.; vol. 120; pp. 347-358 (Jul. 1982). |
Chu et al.; Physicians Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Manual 2002; Jones and Bartlett Publisher; Massachusetts; (Mar. 25, 2002). |
Churchill et al.; Complex Variables and Applications; McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York; (month unavailable 1990). |
Collins, Kim; Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure; Biophys. J.; vol. 72; pp. 65-76; (Jan. 1997). |
Conway, B.E.; Electrochemical Capacitors Their Nature, Function, and Applications; Electrochemistry Encyclopedia. 2003. (Available at http://electrochem.cwru.edu/ed/encycl/art-c03-elchem-cap.htm. Accessed May 16, 2006). |
Conway, B.E.; Electrochemical Supercapacitors Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; pp. 12-13, pp. 104-105, and pp. 192-195; (month unavailable 1999). |
Cooke Jr., Claude E.; Study of electrokinetic effects using sinusoidal pressure and voltage; The Journal of Chemical Physics; vol. 23; No. 12; pp. 2299-2300; (Dec. 1955). |
Dasgupta et al.; Electroosmosis: a reliable fluid propulsion system for flow injection analysis; Anal. Chem.; vol. 66; No. 11; pp. 1792-1798; (Jun. 1, 1994). |
Decher, Fuzzy Nanoassemblies: Toward Layers Polymeric Multicomposites; Science; vol. 277; pp. 1232-1237; (Aug. 29, 21997). |
DeGennes; Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics; Cornell U. Press; p. 223; (Nov. 30, 1979). |
Doshi et al.; Three dimensional laminar dispersion in open and closed rectangular conduits; Chemical Engineering Science; vol. 33(7); pp. 795-804; (month unavailable 1978). |
Drott et al.; Porous silicon as the carrier matrix in microstructured enzyme reactors yielding high enzyme activities; J. Micromech. Microeng; vol. 7(1); pp. 14-23 (Mar. 1997). |
Gan et al.; Mechanism of porous core electroosmotic pump flow injection system and its application to determination of chromium(VI) in waste-water; Talanta; vol. 51(4); pp. 667-675 (Apr. 3, 2000). |
Gennaro, A.R.; Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (20th ed.); Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia; (Dec. 2000). |
Gleiter et al.; Nanocrystalline Materials: A Way to Solids with Tunable Electronic Structures and Properties?; Acta Mater; vol. 49(4); pp. 737-745; (Feb. 23, 2001). |
Gongora-Rubio et al.; The utilization of low temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC-ML) technology for meso-scale EMS, a simple thermistor based flow sensor; Sensors and Actuators; vol. 73; No. 3; pp. 215-221; (Mar. 30, 1999). |
Goodman and Gilman's “The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics;” (10th Ed.); Hardman et al. (editors); (Aug. 13, 2001). |
Greene, George et al., Deposition and Wetting Characteristics of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers on Plasma-Modified Porous Polyethylene, Langmuir, vol. 20, pp. 2739-2745, (Mar. 30, 2004). |
Gritsch et al.; Impedance Spectroscopy of Porin and Gramicidin Pores Reconstituted into Supported Lipid Bilayers on Indium—Tin—Oxide Electrodes; Langmuir; 14(11); pp. 3118-3125; (month unavailable 1998). |
Gurau et al.; On the mechanism of the hofmeister effect; J. Am. Chem. Soc.; vol. 126; pp. 10522-10523; (Sep. 1, 2004). |
Haisma; Direct Bonding in Patent Literature; Philips. J. Res.; vol. 49; issues 1-2; pp. 165-170; (Jan. 1, 1995). |
Hunter; Foundations of Colloid Science vol. II (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford) pp. 994-1002; (Sep. 14, 1989). |
Jackson, J. D.; Classical Electrodynamics 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. (Oct. 3, 1975). |
Jacobasch et al.; Adsorption of ions onto polymer surfaces and its influence on zeta potential and adhesion phenomena, Colloid Polym Sci.; vol. 276(5): pp. 434-442 (May 1998). |
Jarvis et al.; Fuel cell / electrochemical capacitor hybrid for intermittent high power applications; J. Power Sources; vol. 79(1); pp. 60-63; (May 1999). |
Jenkins, Donald et al., Viscosity B-Coefficients of Ions in Solution, Chem. Rev.; vol. 95; No. 8; pp. 2695-2724; (Dec. 1995). |
Jessensky et al.; Self-organized formation of hexagonal pore structures in anodic alumina; J. Electrochem. Soc.; vol. 145; (11); pp. 3735-3740 (Nov. 1998). |
Jimbo et al.; Surface Characterization of Poly(acrylonitrite) Membranes: Graft-Polymerized with Ionic Monomers as Revealed by Zeta Potential Measurements; Macromolecules; vol. 31; No. 4; pp. 1277-84; (Jan. 13, 1998). |
Johnson et al.; Dependence of the conductivity of a porous medium on electrolyte conductivity; Physical Review Letters; 37(7); pp. 3502-3510 (Mar. 1, 1988). |
Johnson et al.; New pore-size parameter characterizing transport in porous media; Physical Review Letter; 57(20); pp. 2564-2567 (Nov. 17, 1986). |
Johnson et al.; Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid-saturated porous media; J. Fluid Mech; 176; pp. 379-402 (Mar. 1987). |
Jomaa et al., Salt-Induced Interdiffusion in Multilayers Films: A Neutron Reflectivity Study, Macromolecules; vol. 38, pp. 8473-8480; (month unavailable 2005). |
Jones et al.; The viscosity of aqueous solutions of strong electrolytes with special reference to barium chloride; J. Am. Chem. Soc.; vol. 51; pp. 2950-2964; (Oct. 5, 1929). |
Kiriy, Anton et al., Cascade of Coil-Globule Conformational Transitions of Single Flexible Polyelectrolyte Molecules in Poor Solvent, J. Am. Chem. Soc.; vol. 124(45); pp. 13454-13462; (Nov. 13, 2002). |
Klein, F.; Affinity Membranes: a 10 Year Review; J. Membrance Sci.; vol. 179; issues 1-2; pp. 1-27; (Nov. 15, 2000). |
Kobatake et al.; Flows through charged membranes. I. flip-flop current vs voltage relation; J. Chem. Phys.; 40(8); pp. 2212-2218 (Apr. 1964). |
Kobatake et al.; Flows through charged membranes. II. Oscillation phenomena; J. Chem. Phys.; 40(8); pp. 2219-2222 ( Apr. 1964). |
Kotz et al.; Principles and applications of electrochemical capacitors; Electrochimica Acta; vol. 45; issues 15-16; pp. 2483-2498; (May 3, 2000). |
Kou et al.; Surface modification of microporous polypropylene membranes by plasma-induced graft polyerization of a-allyl glucoside; Langmuir; vol. 19; pp. 6869-6875; (month unavailable 2003). |
Krasemann et al.; Self-assembled polyelectrolyte multilayer membranes with highly improved pervaporation separation of ethanol/water mixtures; J of Membrane Science; vol. 181; No. 2; pp.221-228; (Jan. 30, 2001). |
Li et al., Studies on preparation and performances of carbon aerogel electrodes for the application of supercapacitor; Journal of Power Sources; vol. 158; pp. 784-788; (Jul. 14, 2006). |
Liu et al.; Electroosmotically pumped capillary flow-injection analysis; Analytica Chimica Acta; vol. 283; issue 2; pp. 739-745; (Nov. 26, 1993). |
Liu et al.; Flow-injection analysis in the capillary format using electroosmotic pumping; Analytica Chimica Acta; vol. 268; issue 1; pp. 1-6; (Oct. 7, 1992). |
Losche et al., Detailed structure of molecularly thin polyelectrolyte multilayer films on solid substrates as revealed by neutron reflectometry; Macromolecules; vol. 31(25); pp. 8893-8906; (Dec. 15, 1998). |
Ma et al.; A review of zeolite-like porous materials; Microporous and Mesoporous Materials; vol. 37; issues 1-2; pp. 243-252 (May 2000). |
Manz et al.; Electroosmotic pumping and electrophoretic separations for miniaturized chemical analysis systems; J. Micromach. Microeng.; vol. 4; issue 4; pp. 257-265; (Dec. 1994). |
Martin et al.; Laminated Plastic Microfluidic Components for Biological and Chemical Systems; J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A; Second Series; vol. 17; No. 4; part II; pp. 2264-2269; (Jul.-Aug. 1999). |
Mika et al., A new class of polyelectrolyte-filled microfiltration membranes with environmentally controlled porosity, Journal of Membrane Science; vol. 108; issues 1-2; pp. 37-56; (Dec. 15, 1995). |
Morrison et al.; Electrokinetic energy conversion in ultrafine capillaries; J. Chem. Phys.; vol. 43; No. 6; pp. 2111-2115 (Sep. 15, 1965). |
Mroz et al.; Disposable Reference Electrode; Analyst; vol. 123;No. 6; pp. 1373-1376; (Jun. 1998). |
Nakanishi et al.; Phase separation in silica sol-gel system containing polyacrylic acid; Journal of Crystalline Solids; 139; pp. 1-13; (month unavailable 1992). |
Park, Juhyun et al., Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Formation on Neutral Hydrophobic Surfaces, Macromolecules; vol. 38, pp. 10542-10550; (month unavailable 2005). |
Paul et al., Electrokinetic pump application in micro-total analysis systems mechanical actuation to HPLC; Micro Total Analysis Systems 2000; Proceedings of the μTAS 2000 Symposium, held in Enschede, The Netherlands; pp. 583-590; (May 14-18, 2000). |
Paul et al.; Electrokinetic generation of high pressures using porous microstructures; Micro Total Analysis Systems '98; Proceedings of the μTAS '98 Workshop, held in Banff, Canada; pp. 49-52 (Oct. 13-16, 1998). |
Peters et al.; Molded rigid polymer monoliths as separation media for capillary electrochromatography; Anal. Chem.; vol. 69; No. 17; pp. 3646-3649; (Sep. 1, 1997). |
Philipse, A.P., Solid opaline packings of colloidal silica spheres; Journal of Materials Science Letters; 8; pp. 1371-1373 (month unavailable 1989). |
Pretorius et al.; Electro-osmosis: a new concept for high-speed liquid chromatography; Journal of Chromatography; vol. 99; pp. 23-30; (month unavailable 1974). |
Rastogi, R.P.; Irreversible thermodynamics of electro-osmotic effects; J. Scient. Ind. Res.; (28); pp. 284-292 (Aug. 1969). |
Rice et al.; Electrokinetic flow in a narrow cylindrical capillary; J. Phys. Chem.; 69(11); pp. 4017-4024 (Nov. 1965). |
Roberts et al.; UV Laser Machined Polymer Substrates for the Development of Microdiagnostic Systems; Anal. Chem.; vol. 69; No. 11; pp. 2035-2042; (Jun. 1, 1997). |
Rosen, M.J.; Ch.2—Adsorption of surface-active agents at interfaces: the electrical double layer; Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, Second Ed., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 32-107; (Feb. 1989). |
Salabat et al.; Thermodynamic and transport properties of aqueous trisodium citrate system at 298.15 K; J. Mol. Liq.; vol. 118; pp. 67-70; (Apr. 15, 2005). |
Salomaeki et al., The Hofmeister Anion Effect and the Growth of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers, Langmuir; vol. 20, pp. 3679-3683; (Apr. 27, 2004). |
Sankaranarayanan et al.; Chap. 1: Anatomical and pathological basis of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and with Lugol's iodine (VILI); A Practical Manual on Visual Screening for Cervical Neoplasia; IARC Press; (Nov. 2003). |
Schlenoff et al., Mechanism of polyelectrolyte multilayer growth: charge overcompensation and distribution; Macromolecules; vol. 34; No. 3; pp. 592-598; (Jan. 30, 2001). |
Schmid et al.; Electrochemistry of capillary systems with narrow pores V. streaming potential: donnan hindrance of electrolyte transport; J. Membrane Sci.; vol. 150; issue 2; pp. 197-209 (Nov. 25, 1998). |
Schmid, G.; Electrochemistry of capillary systems with narrow pores. II. Electroosmosis; J. Membrane Sci.; vol. 150; issue 2; pp. 159-170 (Nov. 25, 1998). |
Schoenhoff, J.; Layered polyelectrolyte complexes: physics of formation and molecular properties, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter; vol. 15, No. 49; pp. R1781-R1808; (Nov. 25, 2003). |
Schweiss et al., Dissociation of Surface Functional Groups and Preferential Adsorption of Ions on Self-Assembled Monolayers Assessed by Streaming Potential and Streaming Current Measurements, Langmuir; vol. 17, No. 14; pp. 4304-4311; (month unavailable 2001). |
Skeel, Ronald T. (editor); Handbook of Chemotherapy (6th Ed.); Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; (May 30, 2003). |
Stokes, V. K.; Joining Methods for Plastics and Plastic Composites: An Overview; Poly. Eng. and Sci.; vol. 29; No. 19; pp. 1310-1324; (mid-Oct. 1989). |
Takamura, Y., et al.; Low-Voltage Electroosmosis Pump and Its Application to On-Chip Linear Stepping Pneumatic Pressure Source; Abstract; Micro Total Analysis Systems; pp. 230-232; (month unavailable 2001). |
Takata et al.; Modification of Transport Properties of Ion Exchange Membranes; J. Membrance. Sci.; vol. 179; No. 1; pp. 101-107; (Nov. 15, 2000). |
Taylor, G.; Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube; Prox. Roy. Soc. (London); 21; pp. 186-203; (Mar. 31, 1953). |
Tuckerman et al.; High-performance heat sinking for VLSI; IEEE Electron Dev. Letts., vol. EDL-2, pp. 126-129; (May 1981). |
Tusek et al.; Surface characterisation of NH3 plasma treated polyamide 6 foils; Colloids and Surfaces A; vol. 195; Nos. 1-3; pp. 81-95; (Dec. 30, 2001). |
Uhlig et al.; The electro-osmotic actuation of implantable insulin micropumps; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; vol. 17(6); pp. 931-943; (Nov. 1983). |
Van Brunt, Jennifer; Armed antibodies; Signals (online magazine); 11 pgs.; Mar. 5, 2004. |
Vinson, J.; Adhesive Bonding of Polymer Composites; Polymer Engineering and Science; vol. 29; No. 19; pp. 1325-1331; (Oct. 1989). |
Watson et al.; Recent Developments in Hot Plate Welding of Thermoplastics; Poly. Eng. and Sci.; vol. 29; No. 19; pp. 1382-1386; (mid-Oct. 1989). |
Weidenhammer, Petra et al., Investigation of Adhesion Properties of Polymer Materials by Atomic Force Microscopy and Zeta Potential Measurements, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 180, issue 1; pp. 232-236; (Jun. 1, 1996). |
Weston et al.; Instrumentation for high-performance liquid chromatography; HPLC and CE, Principles and Practice, Academic Press; (Chp. 3) pp. 82-85; (month unavailable 1997). |
Wijnhoven et al.; Preparation of photonic crystals made of air spheres in titania; Science; 281; pp. 802-804 (Aug. 7, 1998). |
Wong et al., Swelling Behavior of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers in Saturated Water Vapor, Macromolecules; vol. 37, pp. 7285-7289; (month unavailable 2004). |
Yazawa, T., Present status and future potential of preparation of porous glass and its application; Key Engineering Materials; 115; pp. 125-146 (month unavailalble 1996). |
Ye et al.; Capillary electrochromatography with a silica column with dynamically modified cationic surfactant; Journal of Chromatography A; vol. 855(1); pp. 137-145; (Sep. 3, 1999). |
Yezek; Bulk conductivity of soft surface layers: experimental measurement and electrokinetic implications; Langmuir; vol. 21; pp. 10054-10060; (Oct. 25, 2005). |
Yoo et al., Controlling Bilayer Composition and Surface Wettability of Sequentially Adsorbed Multilayers of Weak Polyelectrolytes, Macromolecules; vol. 31; No. 13; pp. 4309-4318; (month unavailable 1998). |
Zeng, S. et al., “Fabrication and characterization of electroosmotic micropumps,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical; vol. 79; issues 2-3; pp. 107-114; (Oct. 15, 2001). |
Zhang et al.; Specific ion effects on the water solubility of macromolecules: PNIPAM and the Hofmeister series; J. Am. Chem. Soc.; vol. 127; pp. 14505-14510; (Oct. 19, 2005). |
Nip et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,927 entitled “Ganging Electrokinetic Pumps,” filed May 7, 2012. |
Nip et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,902 entitled “System and Method of Differential Pressure Control of a Reciprocating Electrokinetic Pump,” filed May 7, 2012. |
Nip et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/632,884 entitled “Electrokinetic Pump Based Wound Treatment System and Methods,” filed Oct. 1, 2012. |
Anex et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/265,069 entitled “Electrokinetic pump having capacitive electrodes,” filed Apr. 29, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120282113 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61482889 | May 2011 | US | |
61482918 | May 2011 | US |